Factors that prevent roughstock rodeo athletes from wearing protective equipment.
Using a cross-sectional survey design, this study sought to determine usage rates and barriers to the use of protective equipment in roughstock athletes. Between 2004 and 2006, amateur, collegiate, and professional roughstock athletes were surveyed using national organizational mailing lists. Findings revealed that during competition, 69% never wore a helmet. Barriers were a negative effect on performance and sport persona. Conversely, 88% always wore a vest. The perception that vest usage was required encouraged roughstock athletes to wear them. Mouthpiece use results were mixed; 58% always used and 21% never used a mouthpiece. Barriers were discomfort and frequent forgetfulness. Reported injury rate was high, with users noting fewer injuries to head and ribs than nonusers, and riders agreed that protective equipment prevented injury to the head, ribs, and mouth. However, equipment usage rates varied widely by type and seemed to be underutilized because the equipment affected performance, was uncomfortable, and "not cowboy."
Temple University School of Medicine, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18612, USA. Dsross1@geisinger.edu
David S
DS
Ross
Alishia
A
Ferguson
Phil
P
Bosha
Kyle
K
Cassas
D000293:Adolescent; D000818:Animals; D001265:Athletic Injuries / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006736:Horses; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015995:Prevalence; D011481:Protective Clothing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011482:Protective Devices / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D019876:Sports Equipment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology; D055815:Young Adult