Cardiac output monitoring: is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare?
As a principal determinant of oxygen delivery and of blood pressure, cardiac output (CO) represents an important hemodynamic variable. Its accurate measurement, therefore, is important to the clinician caring for critically ill patients in a variety of care environments. Though the first clinical measurement of CO occurred 70 years ago, it was the introduction of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) with thermodilution-based determination of CO in the 1970s that set the stage for practical and widespread clinical measurement of CO. Although the usefulness and accuracy of this technique have justified its consideration as a "practical" gold standard in CO measurement, its drawbacks have driven the search for newer, less invasive measurement techniques. The last decade has seen the introduction of several such devices into the clinical arena. This article will serve to give a brief review of the history of CO measurement, to provide a discussion of the measurement of accuracy as it relates to CO measurement, and to discuss some of the newer methods and devices for CO measurement and how they have fared against a "practical" gold standard.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacob
J
Pugsley
Adam B
AB
Lerner
D001794:Blood Pressure; D002302:Cardiac Output; D002407:Catheterization, Swan-Ganz / Q000379:methods*; D016638:Critical Illness; D006801:Humans; D010100:Oxygen / Q000378:metabolism; D013815:Thermodilution / Q000379:methods
D010100:Oxygen