Evaluating housing quality, health and safety using an Internet-based data collection and response system: a cross-sectional study.
BACKGROUND
Typically housing and health surveys are not integrated together and therefore are not representative of population health or national housing stocks. In addition, the existing channels for distributing information about housing and health issues to the general public are limited. The aim of this study was to develop a data collection and response system that would allow us to assess the Finnish housing stock from the points of view of quality, health and safety, and also to provide a tool to distribute information about important housing health and safety issues.


METHODS
The data collection and response system was tested with a sample of 3000 adults (one per household), who were randomly selected from the Finnish Population Register Centre. Spatial information about the exact location of the residences (i.e. coordinates) was included in the database inquiry. People could participate either by completing and returning a paper questionnaire or by completing the same questionnaire via the Internet. The respondents did not receive any compensation for their time in completing the questionnaire.


RESULTS
This article describes the data collection and response system and presents the main results of the population-based testing of the system. A total of 1312 people (response rate 44%) answered the questionnaire, though only 80 answered via the Internet. A third of the respondents had indicated they wanted feedback. Albeit a majority (>90%) of the respondents reported being satisfied or quite satisfied with their residence, there were a number of prevalent housing issues identified that can be related to health and safety.


CONCLUSIONS
The collected database can be used to evaluate the quality of the housing stock in terms of occupant health and safety, and to model its association with occupant health and well-being. However, it must be noted that all the health outcomes gathered in this study are self-reported. A follow-up study is needed to evaluate whether the occupants acted on the feedback they received. Relying solely on an Internet-based questionnaire for collecting data would not appear to provide an adequate response rate for random population-based surveys at this point in time.
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 95, FIN-70701 Kuopio, Finland. mari.turunen@thl.fi
Mari
M
Turunen
Ari
A
Paanala
Juha
J
Villman
Aino
A
Nevalainen
Ulla
U
Haverinen-Shaughnessy
D000328:Adult; D054626:Consumer Health Information / Q000379:methods*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods*; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D005387:Finland; D006306:Health Surveys / Q000379:methods; D006798:Housing / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020380:Needs Assessment; D012449:Safety; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires