Using the Burn Specific Health Scale-brief as a measure of quality of life after a burn-what score should clinicians expect?
BACKGROUND
How do clinicians determine the acceptable level of recovery of quality of life (QoL) after a burn? Many use the Burn Specific Health Scale (BSHS). The aim of this study was to examine normative values of the BSHS-Brief (BSHS-B) questionnaire in the general population.


METHODS
Two random samples of the non-burned public were taken. Each individual completed either the physical or the generic questions adapted from the BSHS-B questionnaire.


RESULTS
Of the 124 subjects who completed the physical questions, > 73% rated themselves 36/36. Group mean (SD) = 34.8 (2.9), median (IQR) = 36 (35-36), range 16-36. Advancing age was associated with reduced physical capability (p = 0.016). In contrast, 7.6% of the 105 subjects who answered the generic questions recorded a full score (84/84). Group mean (SD) = 71.3 (13.8), median (IQR) = 76 (66-80), range 10-84.


CONCLUSIONS
The study showed the non-burned population do not respond with full scores to all questions in the BSHS-B. The result was more notable in the non-physical questions related to the psychological and environmental factors. The data presented prompts clinicians to collect and define acceptable recovery of quality of life after a burn as measured by the BSHS-B for their local burn population.
Burns Service of Western Australia, Royal Perth Hospital, Australia.
Line
L
Kvannli
Vidya
V
Finlay
Dale W
DW
Edgar
Andy
A
Wu
Fiona M
FM
Wood
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002056:Burns / Q000523:psychology*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011788:Quality of Life; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult