title: Rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation?
abstract: The war between colloids and crystalloids wages on. In a large multinational survey of fluid prescribing practices in critically ill patients, we have a new and intriguing snapshot of global fluid resuscitation practices. Colloids are more often used for impaired perfusion or low cardiac output, and the choice of colloid or crystalloid varies enormously between countries. Why are some ICUs prescribing colloids more often than crystalloids when there is little convincing evidence that colloids are superior for fluid resuscitation? Are colloids advantageous in certain diseases, or in specific regional patient populations that have not yet been elucidated? Perhaps we should look inwards: the answer may not be more randomized clinical trials, but better adherence to current guidelines and treatment recommendations.
authors.affiliation: Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, 615 Michael Street, Suite 205, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
authors.forename: Jenny
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Han
authors.forename: Greg S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Martin
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D005440:Fluid Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units; D038622:Internationality; D008297:Male; D012151:Resuscitation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*