title: Phase modulation of the short-latency crossed spinal response in the human soleus muscle.
abstract: Short-latency spinally mediated interlimb reflex pathways were recently reported between the left and right soleus muscles in the human lower-limb during sitting. The aim of the current study was to establish if these pathways were observed during a functional motor task such as human gait and modulated by the gait cycle phase and/or electrical stimulation intensity. The second aim was to elucidate on the afferents involved. Two interventions were investigated. First was ipsilateral tibial nerve (iTN) stimulation at motor threshold (MT), 35% of the maximal peak-to-peak M-wave(M-Max) and 85% M-Max (85M-Max) with stimuli applied at 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%of the gait cycle of the ipsilateral leg. Second was ipsilateral sural nerve (SuN) and medial plantar nerve (MpN) stimulation at 1, 2, and 3X perceptual threshold at 90% of the gait cycle [corrected]. The root mean squared (RMS) of the contralateral soleus (cSOL) responses were analyzed in a time window, 40-55 ms (or 45-60 ms for subjects >50 y/o) following iTN stimulation. The most consistent responses occurred at 90 and 100% of the gait cycle at higher stimulation intensities of the iTN. Significantly inhibitory responses (P = 0.006) were reported at 60 versus 80% (P = 0.03), 90% (P = 0.006), and 100% (P = 0.002) and 70 versus 90% (P = 0.02) and 100% (P = 0.009) of the gait cycle at 85M-Max. The responses became more inhibitory with increasing stimulation intensities at 80% (P = 0.01), 90% (P = 0.001), and 100% (P = 0.004) of the gait cycle. Stimulation of the MpN and SuN at all stimulation intensities demonstrated no short-latency responses. Therefore, it is unlikely that afferents within these nerves contribute to the response. This is the first study to show short-latency spinally mediated responses in the cSOL following iTN stimulation, during walking. It provides evidence for a new spinal pathway contributing to motor control and demonstrates that the response likely has functional relevance.
authors.affiliation: Hammel Neurorehabilitation Hospital and Research Center, Aarhus University, Hammel, Denmark.
authors.forename: Peter W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Stubbs
authors.forename: Jørgen F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Nielsen
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Sinkjær
authors.forename: Natalie
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Mrachacz-Kersting
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology; D000328:Adult; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology*; D009433:Neural Inhibition / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D012018:Reflex / Q000502:physiology*; D013116:Spinal Cord / Q000502:physiology*