title: Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella isolates from chicken in China.
abstract: We evaluated the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated in 2008 from a chicken hatchery, chicken farms, and chicken slaughterhouses in China. A total of 311 Salmonella isolates were collected from the three sources, and two serogroups of Salmonella were detected, of which 133 (42.8%) consisted of Salmonella indiana and 178 (57.2%) of Salmonella enteritidis. The lowest percentage of S. indiana isolates was found in the chicken hatchery (4.2%), followed by the chicken farms (54.9%) and the slaughterhouses (71.4%). More than 80% of the S. indiana isolates were highly resistant to ampicillin (97.7%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (87.9%), cephalothin (87.9%), ceftiofur (85.7%), chloramphenicol (84.9%), florfenicol (90.9%), tetracycline (97.7%), doxycycline (98.5%), kanamycin (90.2%), and gentamicin (92.5%). About 60% of the S. indiana isolates were resistant to enrofloxacin (65.4%), norfloxacin (78.9%), and ciprofloxacin (59.4%). Of the S. indiana isolates, 4.5% were susceptible to amikacin and 5.3% to colistin. Of the S. enteritidis isolates, 73% were resistant to ampicillin, 33.1% to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 66.3% to tetracycline, and 65.3% to doxycycline, whereas all of these isolates were susceptible to the other drugs used in the study. The S. indiana isolates showed resistance to 16 antimicrobial agents. Strains of Salmonella (n = 108) carrying the resistance genes floR, aac(6')-Ib-cr, and bla(TEM) were most prevalent among the 133 isolates of S. indiana, at a frequency of 81.2%. The use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to analyze the S. indiana isolates that showed similar antimicrobial resistance patterns and carried resistance genes revealed six genotypes of these organisms. Most of these isolates had the common pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns found in the chicken hatchery, chicken farms, and slaughterhouses, suggesting that many multidrug-resistant isolates of S. indiana prevailed in the three sources. Some of these isolates were not derived from a specific clone, but represented a variety of genotypes of S. indiana.
authors.affiliation: Key Laboratory of Development and Evaluation of Chemical and Herbal Drugs for Animal Use, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
authors.forename: Yan
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.forename: Cong-Ming
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: Guo-Juan
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: Hong-Yu
authors.initials: HY
authors.lastname: Zhao
authors.forename: Tao
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: He
authors.forename: Xing-Yuan
authors.initials: XY
authors.lastname: Cao
authors.forename: Lei
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Dai
authors.forename: Li-Ning
authors.initials: LN
authors.lastname: Xia
authors.forename: Shang-Shang
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Qin
authors.forename: Jian-Zhong
authors.initials: JZ
authors.lastname: Shen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D015373:Bacterial Typing Techniques; D002645:Chickens / Q000382:microbiology*; D002681:China; D024881:Drug Resistance, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics*; D016521:Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field; D005516:Food Microbiology; D005798:Genes, Bacterial; D008826:Microbial Sensitivity Tests; D010802:Phylogeny; D015995:Prevalence; D012475:Salmonella / Q000187:drug effects / Q000235:genetics* / Q000302:isolation & purification
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents