title: Medical confidentiality in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries: an Anglo-German comparison.
abstract: Professional secrecy of doctors became an issue of considerable medico-legal and political debate in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in both Germany and England, although the legal preconditions for this debate were quite different in the two countries. While in Germany medical confidentiality was a legal obligation and granted in court, no such statutory recognition of doctors' professional secrecy existed in England. This paper is a comparative analysis of medical secrecy in three key areas--divorce trials, venereal disease and abortion--in both countries. Based on sources from the period between c.1870 and 1939, our paper shows how doctors tried to define the scope of professional secrecy as an integral part of their professional honour in relation to important matters of public health.
authors.affiliation: Centre for the History of Medicine and Disease, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University Queen's Campus, Stockton, United Kingdom. a.h.maehle@durham.ac.uk
authors.forename: Andreas-Holger
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Maehle
authors.forename: Sebastian
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Pranghofer
mesh_terms: D003219:Confidentiality / Q000266:history*; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D004739:England; D004992:Ethics, Medical / Q000266:history*; D005858:Germany; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence / Q000266:history*