title: Evidence-based comparison of robotic and open radical prostatectomy.
abstract: The rapid adoption of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has occurred despite a lack of high-quality evidence demonstrating its oncologic advantages, safety, or cost effectiveness compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORP). This review examines the current literature comparing ORP and RALP, focusing on perioperative, oncologic, functional, and economic outcomes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. lowrancw@mskcc.org
authors.forename: William T
authors.initials: WT
authors.lastname: Lowrance
authors.forename: Tatum V
authors.initials: TV
authors.lastname: Tarin
authors.forename: Shahrokh F
authors.initials: SF
authors.lastname: Shariat
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000379:methods*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D012371:Robotics; D016896:Treatment Outcome