A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular prolotherapy versus steroid injection for sacroiliac joint pain.
OBJECTIVE
Controversy exists regarding the efficacy of ligament prolotherapy in alleviating sacroiliac joint pain. The inconsistent success rates reported in previous studies may be attributed to variability in patient selection and techniques between studies. It was hypothesized that intra-articular prolotherapy for patients with a positive response to diagnostic block may mitigate the drawbacks of ligament prolotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and long-term effectiveness of intra-articular prolotherapy in relieving sacroiliac joint pain, compared with intra-articular steroid injection.


METHODS
This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.


METHODS
The study was conducted at an outpatient pain medicine clinic at Chonnam National University Hospital in Gwang-ju, Korea.


METHODS
The study included patients with sacroiliac joint pain, confirmed by ≥50% improvement in response to local anesthetic block, lasting 3 months or longer, and who failed medical treatment.


METHODS
The treatment involved intra-articular dextrose water prolotherapy or triamcinolone acetonide injection using fluoroscopic guidance, with a biweekly schedule and maximum of three injections.


METHODS
Pain and disability scores were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and monthly after completion of treatment.


RESULTS
The numbers of recruited patients were 23 and 25 for the prolotherapy and steroid groups, respectively. The pain and disability scores were significantly improved from baseline in both groups at the 2-week follow-up, with no significant difference between them. The cumulative incidence of ≥50% pain relief at 15 months was 58.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.9%-79.5%) in the prolotherapy group and 10.2% (95% CI 6.7%-27.1%) in the steroid group, as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis; there was a statistically significant difference between the groups (log-rank p < 0.005).


CONCLUSIONS
Intra-articular prolotherapy provided significant relief of sacroiliac joint pain, and its effects lasted longer than those of steroid injections. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety of the procedure and to validate an appropriate injection protocol.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwang-Ju, Korea.
Woong Mo
WM
Kim
Hyung Gon
HG
Lee
Cheol Won
CW
Jeong
Chang Mo
CM
Kim
Myung Ha
MH
Yoon
D000368:Aged; D000893:Anti-Inflammatory Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000529:Complementary Therapies; D005260:Female; D005938:Glucocorticoids / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005947:Glucose / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D007270:Injections, Intra-Articular / Q000379:methods; D053208:Kaplan-Meier Estimate; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000188:drug therapy*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012446:Sacroiliac Joint; D014221:Triamcinolone / Q000627:therapeutic use*
D000893:Anti-Inflammatory Agents; D005938:Glucocorticoids; D014221:Triamcinolone; D005947:Glucose