Vocal frequency change reflects different responses to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers.
Anthropogenic noise is prevalent across the globe and can exclude birds from otherwise suitable habitat and negatively influence fitness; however, the mechanisms responsible for species' responses to noise are not always clear. One effect of noise is a reduction in effective acoustic communication through acoustic masking, yet some urban songbirds may compensate for masking by noise through altering their songs. Whether this vocal flexibility accounts for species persistence in noisy areas is unknown. Here, we investigated the influence of noise on habitat use and vocal frequency in two suboscine flycatchers using a natural experiment that isolated effects of noise from confounding stimuli common to urban habitats. With increased noise exposure, grey flycatcher (Empidonax wrightii) occupancy declined, but vocal frequency did not change. By contrast, ash-throated flycatcher (Myiarchus cinerascens) occupancy was uninfluenced by noise, but individuals in areas with greater noise amplitudes vocalized at a higher frequency, although the increase (≈200 kHz) may only marginally improve communication and may represent a secondary effect from increased vocal amplitude. Even so, the different flycatcher behavioural responses suggest that signal change may help some species persist in noisy areas and prompt important questions regarding which species will cope with an increasingly noisy world.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UCB 334, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. clinton.francis@colorado.edu
Clinton D
CD
Francis
Catherine P
CP
Ortega
Alexander
A
Cruz
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000818:Animals; D006802:Human Activities; D006801:Humans; D009516:New Mexico; D009622:Noise; D046109:Passeriformes / Q000502:physiology*; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D014828:Vocalization, Animal