Justice and proximity: problems for an ethics of care.
This paper aims at addressing some questions considering the conflicting normative claims of partiality, i.e. to provide for the caring needs of the particular patient, and impartial claims of treating all patients with a relevant need equally. This ethical conflict between different conceptions of moral responsibilities within professional ethics relates to debates between an ethics of care and an ethics of justice. An ethics of care is a particularistic position that endorses some form of partiality, i.e. favouring persons to whom one stands in particular relationships. This paper argues that also a professional ethics must endorse some kind of partiality at the clinical level of health care. In fact, consideration of care for particular patients is a prerequisite for giving proper and attentive care towards the individual patient. This paper will discuss how partial concerns might be balanced against claims of distributive justice within the frame of the formal principle of justice. It is concluded that there is an urgent need for the recognition of the consequences of macro-level decisions for the possibility of the discharge of moral responsibility on a clinical level of health care. This would mean that health care institutions should adapt for the possibility of a basic standard of proper care and attention for the individual patient.
Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo University College, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway. marita.nordhaug@hio.no
Marita
M
Nordhaug
Per
P
Nortvedt
D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000941:ethics*; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D004993:Ethics, Nursing; D006801:Humans; D028681:Moral Obligations; D028701:Patient Rights