Role of thoracic epidural block in improving post-operative outcome for septic patients: a preliminary report.
OBJECTIVE
Sepsis is considered a relative contraindication for epidural blockade. Recent evidence indicates that thoracic epidural blockade may be of benefit during sepsis by improving gut perfusion. This study was planned to evaluate whether combining thoracic epidural blockade with general anaesthesia could decrease the post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients with sepsis due to perforation peritonitis.


METHODS
This randomised non-blinded study included consenting adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade II-III, undergoing emergency laparotomy for small intestinal perforation peritonitis. Severity of illness was evaluated using Mannheim Peritonitis Index, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score and clinical indicators of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Patients were randomised into two groups depending on the anaesthetic technique [general anaesthesia combined with thoracic epidural block (group GT) and general anaesthesia (group GA), n = 33 each. The thoracic block was extended from T5 to T10 using 0.125% bupivacaine in aliquots of 2-3 ml, with 50 μg fentanyl. Post-operatively, patients were followed for occurrence of any major morbidity till discharge from hospital, and 30-day mortality. 'Major morbidity' included development of organ failure. Post-operative markers for gut motility and perfusion, that is, time to passage of flatus, stools, resumption of oral feeds and occurrence of anastomotic leak were also observed. Sample size was calculated at power of 80% and α error of 0.05, aiming to detect a decrease of 50% in the incidence of post-operative major morbidity or mortality.


RESULTS
Patients in the two groups were similar with respect to demographic profile and severity of sepsis. The number of patients with major morbidity or 30-day mortality were statistically similar between the two groups (group GT, 0/33; group GA 4/33; P = 0.114). A significantly shorter time to pass stools and resume oral feeds in group GT (4 ± 2 vs. 3 ± 1 days) (P = 0.006 and 0.012, respectively) and lesser incidence of anastomotic leak (0/33 vs. 4/33; P = 0.114) showed earlier recovery of gut motility and perfusion in that group.


CONCLUSIONS
Use of intra-operative segmental thoracic epidural blockade performed in addition to general anaesthesia suggested some benefit in improving post-operative mortality or major morbidity, but the trend was not significant, perhaps due to the small sample size. There was, however, a significantly earlier return of bowel motility and earlier discharge from hospital.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India. drashatyagi@gmail.com
Asha
A
Tyagi
Sathiya
S
Seelan
Ashok K
AK
Sethi
Medha
M
Mohta
D018806:APACHE; D000328:Adult; D000767:Anesthesia, Epidural / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000401:mortality; D000768:Anesthesia, General; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003672:Defecation / Q000187:drug effects; D004435:Eating; D005260:Female; D005769:Gastrointestinal Motility / Q000187:drug effects; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D007416:Intestinal Perforation / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009407:Nerve Block / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000401:mortality; D010538:Peritonitis / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D020127:Recovery of Function; D018805:Sepsis / Q000150:complications / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013904:Thoracic Vertebrae / Q000294:innervation*; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult