A comparison of decentralized, distributed, and centralized vibro-acoustic control.
Direct velocity feedback control of structures is well known to increase structural damping and thus reduce vibration. In multi-channel systems the way in which the velocity signals are used to inform the actuators ranges from decentralized control, through distributed or clustered control to fully centralized control. The objective of distributed controllers is to exploit the anticipated performance advantage of the centralized control while maintaining the scalability, ease of implementation, and robustness of decentralized control. However, and in seeming contradiction, some investigations have concluded that decentralized control performs as well as distributed and centralized control, while other results have indicated that distributed control has significant performance advantages over decentralized control. The purpose of this work is to explain this seeming contradiction in results, to explore the effectiveness of decentralized, distributed, and centralized vibro-acoustic control, and to expand the concept of distributed control to include the distribution of the optimization process and the cost function employed.
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom. kdf@soton.ac.uk
Kenneth D
KD
Frampton
Oliver N
ON
Baumann
Paolo
P
Gardonio
D000162:Acoustics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004867:Equipment Design / Q000379:methods*; D005246:Feedback; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D014732:Vibration