ISDD: A computational model of particle sedimentation, diffusion and target cell dosimetry for in vitro toxicity studies.
BACKGROUND
The difficulty of directly measuring cellular dose is a significant obstacle to application of target tissue dosimetry for nanoparticle and microparticle toxicity assessment, particularly for in vitro systems. As a consequence, the target tissue paradigm for dosimetry and hazard assessment of nanoparticles has largely been ignored in favor of using metrics of exposure (e.g. μg particle/mL culture medium, particle surface area/mL, particle number/mL). We have developed a computational model of solution particokinetics (sedimentation, diffusion) and dosimetry for non-interacting spherical particles and their agglomerates in monolayer cell culture systems. Particle transport to cells is calculated by simultaneous solution of Stokes Law (sedimentation) and the Stokes-Einstein equation (diffusion).


RESULTS
The In vitro Sedimentation, Diffusion and Dosimetry model (ISDD) was tested against measured transport rates or cellular doses for multiple sizes of polystyrene spheres (20-1100 nm), 35 nm amorphous silica, and large agglomerates of 30 nm iron oxide particles. Overall, without adjusting any parameters, model predicted cellular doses were in close agreement with the experimental data, differing from as little as 5% to as much as three-fold, but in most cases approximately two-fold, within the limits of the accuracy of the measurement systems. Applying the model, we generalize the effects of particle size, particle density, agglomeration state and agglomerate characteristics on target cell dosimetry in vitro.


CONCLUSIONS
Our results confirm our hypothesis that for liquid-based in vitro systems, the dose-rates and target cell doses for all particles are not equal; they can vary significantly, in direct contrast to the assumption of dose-equivalency implicit in the use of mass-based media concentrations as metrics of exposure for dose-response assessment. The difference between equivalent nominal media concentration exposures on a μg/mL basis and target cell doses on a particle surface area or number basis can be as high as three to six orders of magnitude. As a consequence, in vitro hazard assessments utilizing mass-based exposure metrics have inherently high errors where particle number or surface areas target cells doses are believed to drive response. The gold standard for particle dosimetry for in vitro nanotoxicology studies should be direct experimental measurement of the cellular content of the studied particle. However, where such measurements are impractical, unfeasible, and before such measurements become common, particle dosimetry models such as ISDD provide a valuable, immediately useful alternative, and eventually, an adjunct to such measurements.
Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland WA 99352, USA.
Paul M
PM
Hinderliter
Kevin R
KR
Minard
Galya
G
Orr
William B
WB
Chrisler
Brian D
BD
Thrall
Joel G
JG
Pounds
Justin G
JG
Teeguarden
D000826:Animal Testing Alternatives; D001692:Biological Transport; D054316:Biomarkers, Pharmacological; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D011232:Chemical Precipitation; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004058:Diffusion; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D005290:Ferric Compounds / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D053758:Nanoparticles; D010316:Particle Size; D011137:Polystyrenes / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012822:Silicon Dioxide / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D018675:Toxicity Tests
D054316:Biomarkers, Pharmacological; D005290:Ferric Compounds; D011137:Polystyrenes; C000499:ferric oxide; D012822:Silicon Dioxide