"I've been NIATxed": participants' experience with process improvement.
Process improvement strategies provide industries with a method for improving outcomes and performance at a low cost and with minimal training. In Los Angeles County, two process improvement projects were implemented as a way to improve access to, and engagement and retention in, alcohol and other drug abuse treatment. A qualitative evaluation was completed after the Phase II pilot project to assess how the providers felt about the project, what worked, what did not work, what was learned, and the degree to which process improvements changed program operations. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 33 individuals, representing every level of staff participation in the project. Overall, comments indicated a positive experience for staff, administrators, and clients. Providers noted the relative ease of implementation and how quickly changes resulted in impressive improvements. Challenging issues included resistant staff or a lack of additional resources to pay for the project; however, most noted that these issues were resolved. Interview participants also requested more training on data collection and a reduction in the frequency of the project conference calls. This study gives support to the idea of process improvement being a tool that dramatically improves services to consumers of addiction treatment services.
Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA. desireec@ucla.edu
Desirée
D
Crèvecoeur-MacPhail
Anne
A
Bellows
Beth A
BA
Rutkowski
Loretta
L
Ransom
Ana Ceci
AC
Myers
Richard A
RA
Rawson
D003625:Data Collection; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D017064:Process Assessment, Health Care; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000628:therapy*