title: Evaluation of buffer zone effectiveness in mitigating the risks associated with agricultural runoff in Prince Edward Island.
abstract: To minimize the risk posed by runoff from row crops, Prince Edward Island introduced buffer legislation in 2000. The legislation mandates 10-m and 20-m buffers, respectively, for moderate sloped (i.e. <5%) and steep sloped (i.e. >5%) agricultural fields that border streams. Since 2001, Environment Canada has been evaluating the effectiveness of various buffer widths on operational farms in reducing toxicity and contaminant concentrations in runoff. Sample collectors, placed in 44 fields at the field edge (0m), 10m and at distances out to 30m, collected overland flow following rainfall-induced runoff events. Samples were collected within 24 hours of an event and analysed for seven pesticides (endosulfan, chlorothalonil, carbofuran, linuron, metribuzin, metalaxyl, mancozeb), water quality parameters and Daphnia magna toxicity. The 10-m buffer required for moderate sloped fields was effective at reducing contaminant concentrations but not always to less than lethal concentrations to Daphnia magna. Limited data beyond 10m for fields of both slope types precluded making recommendations on a suitable buffer width for shallow sloped fields and evaluating the effectiveness of 20-m buffers for steep sloped fields. When paired data were combined and statistically tested for all fields, the studied pesticides underwent a 52-98% and 68-100% reduction in aqueous and particulate concentrations within 10m and 30m, respectively. In addition, by 10m, soluble phosphorus, nitrate-nitrogen and total suspended solids were reduced by 34%, 38% and 64%, respectively. Results suggest buffer zones on operational farms are capable of achieving contaminant reductions comparable to those reported for controlled experiments. Inconsistent siting of sample collectors beyond 10m limited the evaluation of the effects of field slope and buffer width on buffer effectiveness on working farms. Future studies on buffer efficiency on operational farms should focus on building the data set beyond 10m and evaluating load reductions.
authors.affiliation: Environment Canada, 45 Alderney Drive, Queen Square, Dartmouth, NS, B2Y 2N6, Canada. Allison.Dunn@ec.gc.ca
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Dunn
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Julien
authors.forename: W R
authors.initials: WR
authors.lastname: Ernst
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cook
authors.forename: K G
authors.initials: KG
authors.lastname: Doe
authors.forename: P M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Jackman
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D000818:Animals; D003621:Daphnia / Q000187:drug effects; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D010575:Pesticides / Q000032:analysis* / Q000633:toxicity; D011325:Prince Edward Island; D011891:Rain; D045483:Rivers / Q000737:chemistry*; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis* / Q000633:toxicity; D014876:Water Pollution / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
chemical_list: D010575:Pesticides; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical