title: Two neo-Darwinisms.
abstract: There are two extant theories of evolution, each of which deserves the honourific "neo-Darwinism": Modern Synthesis Replicator theory and a theory I shall call Developmental Darwinism. The principal difference concerns the canonical unit of biological organization. Modern Synthesis replicator theory explains the process of evolution by appeal to the activities of genes or replicators. Developmental Darwinism explains the process of evolution by appeal to the capacities of organisms. In particular, it is the plasticity of organisms, manifested most distinctly during development, that causes adaptive evolution. Despite the fact that each, in its own way, traces its origin to the theory outlined by Darwin, they are radically different. The objectives of this essay are twofold: to underscore the differences between these theories, and to argue that Developmental Darwinism, though nascent, is a viable alternative to Modern Synthesis replicator theory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy and Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, The University of Toronto, 91 Charles Street West, Toronto, ON, Canada M5K 1J7.
authors.forename: Denis M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Walsh
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001695:Biology; D004813:Epidemiology; D055614:Genetic Phenomena; D005838:Genotype; D040941:Heredity; D006801:Humans; D010641:Phenotype