title: Ambulatory facility design and patients' perceptions of healthcare quality.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This research examines whether the physical attractiveness of an outpatient practice influences patients' perceptions of healthcare quality, including patient and staff perceptions of the quality of staff-patient interaction.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Despite the high and increasing percentage of healthcare dollars for care delivered on an outpatient basis, relatively little research has examined the relationship between the design of ambulatory facilities and patient outcomes. Few studies have examined how patients' perceptions of healthcare quality differ in the same outpatient practice before and after a move to a new facility designed to be patient-centered. This study is the second phase of a study comparing patients' perceived quality of care in ambulatory facilities that differ markedly in physical attractiveness.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using both a patient and staff survey, and structured interviews, this study compared staff and patient perceptions of healthcare quality (including staff-patient interactions) before and after a move to a new facility designed to be patient-centered.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Patients' perceived quality of care, and their perceptions of the quality of interaction with staff, was significantly better in the patient-centered facility. Few differences were found in actual patient-staff interaction behaviors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study is consistent with other studies that examined the relationship among the physical attractiveness of healthcare settings, patient satisfaction, and perceived quality of care. For this reason, the results are more credible than they would be were they inconsistent with other research or were this the only study examining these issues. These results support the value of investing in the physical attractiveness of patient areas in the ambulatory care setting. Further research is needed to identify specific physical elements that contribute to positive attributions related to quality of care, as well as where the "tipping point" is in investments to improve physical attractiveness.
authors.affiliation: Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. fdb2@cornell.edu
authors.forename: Franklin
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Becker
authors.forename: Bridget
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Sweeney
authors.forename: Kelley
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Parsons
mesh_terms: D000554:Ambulatory Care Facilities; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D004954:Esthetics; D005160:Facility Design and Construction; D006272:Health Facility Environment; D006801:Humans; D007374:Interior Design and Furnishings; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D009518:New York; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D018802:Patient-Centered Care; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011787:Quality of Health Care