title: Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?
abstract: Prognosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) strongly correlates with tumor grade as determined by Nottingham combined histologic grade. While reporting grade as low grade/favorable (G1), intermediate grade/moderately favorable (G2), and high grade/unfavorable (G3) is recommended by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, existing TNM (Primary Tumor/Regional Lymph Nodes/Distant Metastasis) classification does not directly incorporate these data. For large tumors (T3, T4), significance of histologic grade may be clinically moot as those are nearly always candidates for adjuvant therapy. However, for small (T1, T2) node-negative (N0) tumors, grade may be clinically relevant in influencing treatment decisions, but data on outcomes are sparse and controversial. This retrospective study analyzes clinical outcome in patients with small N0 IDC on the basis of tumor grade. Our results suggest that the grade does not impact clinical outcome in T1N0 tumors. In T2N0 tumors, however, it might be prognostically significant and relevant in influencing decisions regarding the need for additional adjuvant therapy and optimal management.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Chandler Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, MS 129, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
authors.forename: Mathew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Purdom
authors.forename: Michael L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Cibull
authors.forename: Terry D
authors.initials: TD
authors.lastname: Stratton
authors.forename: Luis M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Samayoa
authors.forename: Edward H
authors.initials: EH
authors.lastname: Romond
authors.forename: Patrick C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: McGrath
authors.forename: Rouzan G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Karabakhtsian