title: Electromyographic study of differential sensitivity to succinylcholine of the diaphragm, laryngeal and somatic muscles: a swine model.
abstract: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) might diminish the electromyography signal of the vocalis muscles during intraoperative neuromonitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. The aim of this study was to compare differential sensitivity of different muscles to succinylcholine in a swine model, and to realize the influence of NMBAs on neuromonitoring. Six male Duroc-Landrace piglets were anesthetized with thiamylal and underwent tracheal intubation without the use of an NMBA. The left recurrent laryngeal nerve, the spinal accessory nerve, the right phrenic nerve and the brachial plexus were stimulated. Evoked potentials (electromyography signal) of four muscle groups were elicited from needle electrodes before and after intravenous succinylcholine bolus (1.0 mg/kg). Recorded muscles included the vocalis muscles, trapezius muscle, diaphragm and triceps brachii muscles. The onset time and 80% recovery of control response were recorded and analyzed. The testing was repeated after 30 minutes. The onset time of neuromuscular blocking for the vocalis muscles, trapezius muscle, diaphragm and triceps brachii muscle was 36.3 ± 6.3 seconds, 38.8 ± 14.9 seconds, 52.5 ± 9.7 seconds and 45.0 ± 8.2 seconds during the first test; and 49.3 ± 10.8 seconds, 40.0 ± 12.2 seconds, 47.5 ± 11.9 seconds and 41.3 ± 10.1 seconds during the second test. The 80% recovery of the control response for each muscle was 18.3 ± 2.7 minutes, 16.5±6.9 minutes, 8.1±2.5 minutes and 14.8±2.9 minutes during the first test; and 21.5±3.8 minutes, 12.5 ± 4.3 minutes, 10.5 ± 3.1 minutes and 16.4 ± 4.2 minutes during the second test. The sensitivity of the muscles to succinylcholine, ranked in order, was: the vocalis muscles, the triceps brachii muscle, the trapezius muscle and the diaphragm. We demonstrated a useful and reliable animal model to investigate the effects of NMBAs on intraoperative neuromonitoring. Extrapolation of these data to humans should be done with caution.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
authors.forename: I-Cheng
authors.initials: IC
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.forename: Hsun-Mo
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Yi-Wei
authors.initials: YW
authors.lastname: Kuo
authors.forename: Chia-Fang
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Shieh
authors.forename: Feng-Yu
authors.initials: FY
authors.lastname: Chiang
authors.forename: Che-Wei
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: Cheng-Jing
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Tsai
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003964:Diaphragm / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000294:innervation; D004576:Electromyography / Q000379:methods*; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000187:drug effects; D007830:Larynx / Q000187:drug effects*; D009466:Neuromuscular Blocking Agents / Q000494:pharmacology*; D010791:Phrenic Nerve / Q000187:drug effects; D012009:Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve / Q000187:drug effects; D013390:Succinylcholine / Q000494:pharmacology*; D013552:Swine
chemical_list: D009466:Neuromuscular Blocking Agents; D013390:Succinylcholine