title: [Torque resistance of three different types of nickel-titanium rotary instruments].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare torsional fracture of three different types of nickel-titanium rotary instruments ProTaper, Hero642 and Mtwo by making a stimulate models in vitro.
  
  
  METHODS
  Through the establishment of model in vitro, compared the different time with 3 kinds of nickel titanium file in cutting-edge bound occurs, and to observe the section of fractured instruments by scanning electron microscope.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The resistence to torque was different from three types of nickel titanium instruments. The time to fracture of Mtwo was significantly longer than ProTaper's and Hero642's, but ProTaper's and Hero642's had no significant difference. Three kinds cross-sectional design were different, a lot of toughness nests were seen in broken surface. Most of them were ductile fracture. Time to fracture was influenced by the quality disfigurement.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The resistance to torque of Mtwo was better than ProTaper and Hero642. The lifespan was influenced by the design of cross-section. The quality disfigurement of the files reduced the resistance to flexual fatigue.
authors.affiliation: Dept. of Prosthodontics, Changsha Stomatological Hospital, Changsha 410005, China.
authors.forename: Wei
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Sun
authors.forename: Ben-xiang
authors.initials: BX
authors.lastname: Hou
mesh_terms: D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003722:Dental Alloys; D004867:Equipment Design; D004868:Equipment Failure; D008422:Materials Testing; D009532:Nickel; D018915:Root Canal Preparation; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D014025:Titanium; D019415:Torque
chemical_list: D003722:Dental Alloys; C040654:titanium nickelide; D009532:Nickel; D014025:Titanium