title: Law & psychiatry: reforming malpractice: the prospects for change.
abstract: Previous efforts to change the U.S. medical malpractice system have involved such initiatives as time limits on filing claims, caps on noneconomic damages, and limiting attorneys' fees. This column briefly reviews such past efforts and describes several new approaches. They include programs that encourage prompt disclosure of errors and offers of compensation, efforts to mediate complaints outside the courts, and use of administrative processes to adjudicate claims. "No-fault" systems, such as those in New Zealand, Sweden, and Denmark, may be most likely to satisfy the interests of both patients and physicians but may not be politically acceptable in the United States.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. psa21@columbia.edu
authors.forename: Paul S
authors.initials: PS
authors.lastname: Appelbaum
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D016365:Liability, Legal / Q000191:economics; D008318:Malpractice / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011640:Public Policy; D014481:United States