title: Effect of laxatives and pharmacological therapies in chronic idiopathic constipation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There has been no definitive systematic review and meta-analysis to date examining the effect of laxatives and pharmacological therapies in chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess efficacy of these therapies systematically in CIC.
  
  
  METHODS
  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
  
  
  METHODS
  MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched (up to September 2010).
  
  
  METHODS
  Placebo-controlled trials of laxatives or pharmacological therapies in adult CIC patients were eligible. Minimum duration of therapy was 1 week. Trials had to report either a dichotomous assessment of overall response to therapy at last point of follow-up in the trial, or mean number of stools per week during therapy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Symptom data were pooled using a random effects model. Effect of laxatives or pharmacological therapies compared to placebo was reported as RR of failure to respond to therapy, or a weighted mean difference (WMD) in mean number of stools per week, with 95% CIs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-one eligible RCTs were identified. Laxatives (seven RCTs, 1411 patients, RR=0.52; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.60), prucalopride (seven trials, 2639 patients, RR=0.82; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.88), lubiprostone (three RCTs, 610 patients, RR=0.67; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.80), and linaclotide (three trials, 1582 patients, RR=0.84; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.87) were all superior to placebo in terms of a reduction in risk of failure with therapy. Treatment effect remained similar when only RCTs at low risk of bias were included in the analysis. Diarrhoea was significantly more common with all therapies.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Only two RCTs were conducted in primary care, and total adverse events data for laxatives and linaclotide were sparse.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Laxatives, prucalopride, lubiprostone and linaclotide are all more effective than placebo for the treatment of CIC.
authors.affiliation: Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Room 230, D Floor, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS13EX, UK. alexf12399@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Alexander C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Ford
authors.forename: Nicole C
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Suares
mesh_terms: D000527:Alprostadil / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000031:analogs & derivatives / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001572:Benzofurans / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002908:Chronic Disease; D003248:Constipation / Q000188:drug therapy*; D003967:Diarrhea / Q000139:chemically induced; D006801:Humans; D054368:Laxatives / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000068238:Lubiprostone; D010455:Peptides / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D001572:Benzofurans; D054368:Laxatives; D010455:Peptides; C406662:prucalopride; D000068238:Lubiprostone; D000527:Alprostadil; C523483:linaclotide