Comparison of intensity-modulated continuous-wave lasers with a chirped modulation frequency to pulsed lasers for photoacoustic imaging applications.
Using a Green's function solution to the photoacoustic wave equation, we compare intensity-modulated continuous-wave (CW) lasers with a chirped modulation frequency to pulsed lasers for photoacoustic imaging applications. Assuming the same transducer is used in both cases, we show that the axial resolution is identical and is determined by the transducer and material properties of the object. We derive a simple formula relating the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the two imaging systems that only depends on the fluence of each pulse and the time-bandwidth product of the chirp pulse. We also compare the SNR of the two systems assuming the fluence is limited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) laser safety guidelines for skin. We find that the SNR is about 20 dB to 30 dB larger for pulsed laser systems for reasonable values of the parameters. However, CW diode lasers have the advantage of being compact and relatively inexpensive, which may outweigh the lower SNR in many applications.
Adam
A
Petschke
Patrick J
PJ
La Rivière
J Biomed Opt. 2009 Jul-Aug;14(4):044025
19725736
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Nov;72(5 Pt 1):051908
16383646
Med Phys. 1995 Oct;22(10):1605-9
8551984
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Dec;116(6):3523-33
15658704
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Oct 7;54(19):R59-97
19724102
J Biomed Opt. 2006 Jul-Aug;11(4):044006
16965163