Oil accumulation in the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: characterization, variability between common laboratory strains and relationship with starch reserves.
BACKGROUND
When cultivated under stress conditions, many microalgae species accumulate both starch and oil (triacylglycerols). The model green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has recently emerged as a model to test genetic engineering or cultivation strategies aiming at increasing lipid yields for biodiesel production. Blocking starch synthesis has been suggested as a way to boost oil accumulation. Here, we characterize the triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation process in Chlamydomonas and quantify TAGs in various wild-type and starchless strains.


RESULTS
In response to nitrogen deficiency, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii produced TAGs enriched in palmitic, oleic and linoleic acids that accumulated in oil-bodies. Oil synthesis was maximal between 2 and 3 days following nitrogen depletion and reached a plateau around day 5. In the first 48 hours of oil deposition, a ~80% reduction in the major plastidial membrane lipids occurred. Upon nitrogen re-supply, mobilization of TAGs started after starch degradation but was completed within 24 hours. Comparison of oil content in five common laboratory strains (CC124, CC125, cw15, CC1690 and 11-32A) revealed a high variability, from 2 μg TAG per million cell in CC124 to 11 μg in 11-32A. Quantification of TAGs on a cell basis in three mutants affected in starch synthesis (cw15sta1-2, cw15sta6 and cw15sta7-1) showed that blocking starch synthesis did not result in TAG over-accumulation compared to their direct progenitor, the arginine auxotroph strain 330. Moreover, no significant correlation was found between cellular oil and starch levels among the twenty wild-type, mutants and complemented strains tested. By contrast, cellular oil content was found to increase steeply with salt concentration in the growth medium. At 100 mM NaCl, oil level similar to nitrogen depletion conditions could be reached in CC124 strain.


CONCLUSIONS
A reference basis for future genetic studies of oil metabolism in Chlamydomonas is provided. Results highlight the importance of using direct progenitors as control strains when assessing the effect of mutations on oil content. They also suggest the existence in Chlamydomonas of complex interplays between oil synthesis, genetic background and stress conditions. Optimization of such interactions is an alternative to targeted metabolic engineering strategies in the search for high oil yields.
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), Direction of Life Sciences, Institute for Environmental Biology and Biotechnology, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France.
Magali
M
Siaut
Stéphan
S
Cuiné
Caroline
C
Cagnon
Boris
B
Fessler
Mai
M
Nguyen
Patrick
P
Carrier
Audrey
A
Beyly
Fred
F
Beisson
Christian
C
Triantaphylidès
Yonghua
Y
Li-Beisson
Gilles
G
Peltier
D019149:Bioreactors; D016825:Chlamydomonas reinhardtii / Q000737:chemistry / Q000145:classification / Q000378:metabolism*; D002734:Chlorophyll; D005227:Fatty Acids / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D046529:Microscopy, Electron, Transmission; D008954:Models, Biological; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000172:deficiency; D010078:Oxazines / Q000737:chemistry; D012965:Sodium Chloride / Q000737:chemistry; D013213:Starch / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D014280:Triglycerides / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*
D005227:Fatty Acids; D010078:Oxazines; D014280:Triglycerides; D002734:Chlorophyll; D012965:Sodium Chloride; D013213:Starch; D009584:Nitrogen; C044808:nile red
Plant Physiol. 2001 Dec;127(4):1334-8
11743070
Plant Physiol. 1978 Jun;61(6):953-6
16660433
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001 Jun;52:363-406
11337403
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Jan 1;102(1):100-12
18683258
FEBS Lett. 2002 Oct 2;529(1):34-8
12354609
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Jul;24(7):777-84
16841058
Eur J Biochem. 1993 Jul 15;215(2):351-60
8344302
Eukaryot Cell. 2010 Aug;9(8):1251-61
20562225
J Chem Biol. 2008 Nov;1(1-4):79-87
19568800
J Microbiol Methods. 2009 Apr;77(1):41-7
19162091
Eukaryot Cell. 2005 Feb;4(2):242-52
15701786
Plant J. 2008 May;54(4):621-39
18476868
Plant Physiol. 2001 Apr;125(4):1723-31
11299353
Eukaryot Cell. 2009 Dec;8(12):1856-68
19880756
Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959 Aug;37(8):911-7
13671378
J Bacteriol. 2001 Feb;183(3):1069-77
11208806
J Biol Chem. 1996 Jul 5;271(27):16281-7
8663144
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1988 Dec;267(2):521-8
2905594
Plant Physiol. 1978 Apr;61(4):556-60
16660335
Science. 2007 Oct 12;318(5848):245-50
17932292
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Apr;10(2):190-8
17291820
Nature. 2009 Feb 12;457(7231):843-8
19212403
J Cell Biol. 1985 Mar;100(3):965-73
3972906
Metab Eng. 2010 Jul;12(4):387-91
20172043
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;85:1-22
19147000
Phytochemistry. 2006 May;67(9):904-15
16600316
Poult Sci. 1987 Jan;66(1):103-11
3575228
Plant Physiol. 2000 Apr;122(4):1193-9
10759515
Arabidopsis Book. 2010;8:e0133
22303259
Eukaryot Cell. 2010 Jan;9(1):97-106
19915074
Plant Cell. 1996 Aug;8(8):1353-1366
12239416
J Biosci Bioeng. 2006 Mar;101(3):223-6
16716922
Planta. 1991 Aug;185(1):17-26
24186274
Biotechnol Adv. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):294-306
17350212
Protist. 2000 Oct;151(3):201-24
11079767
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010 Oct 1;107(2):258-68
20506159
Plant Biotechnol J. 2009 Sep;7(7):694-703
19702756
Plant Physiol. 1987 Dec;85(4):892-7
16665826