Interpreting the effects of image manipulation on picture perception in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).
The effects of picture manipulations on humans' and pigeons' performance were examined in a go/no-go discrimination of two perceptually similar categories, cat and dog faces. Four types of manipulation were used to modify the images. Mosaicization and scrambling were used to produce degraded versions of the training stimuli, while morphing and cell exchange were used to manipulate the relative contribution of positive and negative training stimuli to test stimuli. Mosaicization mainly removes information at high spatial frequencies, whereas scrambling removes information at low spatial frequencies to a greater degree. Morphing leads to complex transformations of the stimuli that are not concentrated at any particular spatial frequency band. Cell exchange preserves high spatial frequency details, but sometimes moves them into the "wrong" stimulus. The four manipulations also introduce high-frequency noise to differing degrees. Responses to test stimuli indicated that high and low spatial frequency information were both sufficient but not necessary to maintain discrimination performance in both species, but there were also species differences in relative sensitivity to higher and lower spatial frequency information.
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, UK. kgoto@psy.flet.keio.ac.jp
Kazuhiro
K
Goto
Stephen E G
SE
Lea
Andy J
AJ
Wills
Fraser
F
Milton
D000818:Animals; D010856:Columbidae / Q000502:physiology; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology