Investigating the effect of paralogs on microarray gene-set analysis.
BACKGROUND
In order to interpret the results obtained from a microarray experiment, researchers often shift focus from analysis of individual differentially expressed genes to analyses of sets of genes. These gene-set analysis (GSA) methods use previously accumulated biological knowledge to group genes into sets and then aim to rank these gene sets in a way that reflects their relative importance in the experimental situation in question. We suspect that the presence of paralogs affects the ability of GSA methods to accurately identify the most important sets of genes for subsequent research.


RESULTS
We show that paralogs, which typically have high sequence identity and similar molecular functions, also exhibit high correlation in their expression patterns. We investigate this correlation as a potential confounding factor common to current GSA methods using Indygene http://www.cbio.uct.ac.za/indygene, a web tool that reduces a supplied list of genes so that it includes no pairwise paralogy relationships above a specified sequence similarity threshold. We use the tool to reanalyse previously published microarray datasets and determine the potential utility of accounting for the presence of paralogs.


CONCLUSIONS
The Indygene tool efficiently removes paralogy relationships from a given dataset and we found that such a reduction, performed prior to GSA, has the ability to generate significantly different results that often represent novel and plausible biological hypotheses. This was demonstrated for three different GSA approaches when applied to the reanalysis of previously published microarray datasets and suggests that the redundancy and non-independence of paralogs is an important consideration when dealing with GSA methodologies.
Computational Biology Group, Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. andrefau@ebi.ac.uk
Andre J
AJ
Faure
Cathal
C
Seoighe
Nicola J
NJ
Mulder
D000465:Algorithms; D029681:Arabidopsis Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling / Q000379:methods*; D015233:Models, Statistical; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D012984:Software; D014584:User-Computer Interface
D029681:Arabidopsis Proteins
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D575-7
14681484
Trends Genet. 2000 Jun;16(6):276-7
10827456
Bioinformatics. 2004 Dec 12;20(18):3710-5
15297299
Science. 2003 Aug 1;301(5633):653-7
12893945
Neurochem Res. 2004 Jun;29(6):1213-22
15176478
Bioinformatics. 2007 Apr 15;23(8):980-7
17303618
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article16
16646794
Nat Genet. 2005 Mar;37(3):233-42
15711545
Nat Genet. 2002 Jan;30(1):41-7
11731795
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 07;8:431
17988400
Atherosclerosis. 1978 May;30(1):17-25
209795
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1996 Jul;16(3):170-9
8814449
Appl Bioinformatics. 2004;3(4):261-4
15702958
Lung Cancer. 2002 Aug;37(2):153-9
12140138
Genome Res. 2007 Oct;17(10):1537-45
17785539
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 20;98(24):13790-5
11707567
Science. 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804
12399584
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jun 12;20(9):1464-5
14962934
Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):607-14
12007217
Genome Biol. 2007;8(9):R187
17845722
Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):1950-7
15657105
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jun 12;20(9):1462-3
14962933
Brief Bioinform. 2008 May;9(3):189-97
18202032
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004 Dec;287(6):L1154-9
15298854
Lancet. 1995 Feb 18;345(8947):436-8
7853958
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 1;22(13):1600-7
16606683
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D190-5
18045787
Nat Genet. 2004 Jul;36(7):663; author reply 663
15226741
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 05;8:242
17612399
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
10802651
Leukemia. 1999 Sep;13(9):1367-73
10482987
Bioinformatics. 2004 Mar 1;20(4):578-80
14990455
Protein Eng. 1999 Feb;12(2):85-94
10195279
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Jan;7(1):55-65
16369572
Blood. 2004 Apr 15;103(8):2956-64
15070671
Blood. 2003 Oct 1;102(7):2581-92
12791645
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 6;101(27):10143-8
15210990
Bioinformatics. 2004 May 1;20(7):1196-7
14764555
Nat Med. 2002 Aug;8(8):816-24
12118244
Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Aug;7(8):2425-33
11489822
Nat Genet. 2003 Jul;34(3):267-73
12808457
Trends Genet. 2004 Jul;20(7):287-90
15219392
Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(3):449-53
16113772
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50
16199517
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 21;102(25):8961-5
15951424
Genome Biol. 2003;4(4):R28
12702209
J Lipid Res. 1999 Aug;40(8):1417-25
10428977
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 1;20(1):93-9
14693814
Genome Biol. 2003;4(10):R70
14519205
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Feb 03;10:47
19192285
J Clin Invest. 1999 Aug;104(3):263-9
10430607
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5116-21
11309499
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30
10592173
Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 15;22(16):2028-36
16809386
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jul 05;6:168
15998470