Not all sources of familiarity are created equal: the case of word frequency and repetition in episodic recognition.
Low-frequency (LF) words produce higher hit rates and lower false alarm rates than high-frequency (HF) words. This word frequency mirror pattern has been interpreted within dual-process models of recognition, which assume the contributions of a slower recollective process and a relatively fast-acting familiarity process. In the present experiments, recollection and familiarity were placed in opposition using Jacoby, L. L., Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541 (1991), two-list exclusion paradigm with HF and LF words. Exclusion errors to LF words exceeded those to HF words at fast deadlines, whereas the reverse occurred at slow deadlines. In Experiments 2 and 3, false alarms to HF nonpresented lures were higher than to LF nonpresented lures, indicating the use of baseline familiarity for totally new items. Combined, these results indicate that in addition to baseline familiarity and recollection, a third process involving the assessment of a relative change in familiarity is involved in recognition performance. Both relative changes in familiarity and recollection processes have distinct time courses and are engaged when there is diagnostic list information available, whereas baseline familiarity is used when there is no diagnostic information available (e.g., for nonpresented lure items).
Department of Psychology, Colby College, 5550 Mayflower Hill, Waterville, ME 04901, USA. jhcoane@colby.edu
Jennifer H
JH
Coane
David A
DA
Balota
Patrick O
PO
Dolan
Larry L
LL
Jacoby
D001288:Attention; D003210:Concept Formation; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D013067:Speech Perception; D014706:Verbal Learning
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Nov;26(6):1534-55
11185781
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Mar;128(1):32-55
10100390
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 May;25(3):563-82
10368927
Memory. 1994 Sep;2(3):255-73
7584295
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):1-21
16724763
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1981 Sep;110(3):306-40
6457080
Mem Cognit. 2001 Jul;29(5):691-7
11531224
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Mar;15(1):147-62
16019226
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):14-33
11204095
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Jan;25(1):3-22
9949705
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Sep;131(3):325-48
12214750
Can J Exp Psychol. 1994 Dec;48(4):516-35
7866392
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):361-79
11561915
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr;11(2):353-61
15260205
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Apr;98(2-3):267-90
9621834
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Mar;26(2):294-320
10764098
Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):814-23
16984300
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):283-316
15149254
Mem Cognit. 1985 Jan;13(1):8-20
4010518
Conscious Cogn. 1996 Mar-Jun;5(1-2):131-41
8733927