Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers.
Recent studies have reported that flanking stimuli broaden the psychometric function and lower detection thresholds. In the present study, we measured psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers to investigate whether these effects occur throughout the contrast continuum. Our results confirm that lower detection thresholds with flankers are accompanied by broader psychometric functions. Psychometric functions for discrimination reveal that discrimination thresholds with and without flankers are similar across standard levels, and that the broadening of psychometric functions with flankers disappears as standard contrast increases, to the point that psychometric functions at high standard levels are virtually identical with or without flankers. Threshold-versus-contrast (TvC) curves with flankers only differ from TvC curves without flankers in occasional shallower dippers and lower branches on the left of the dipper, but they run virtually superimposed at high standard levels. We discuss differences between our results and other results in the literature, and how they are likely attributed to the differential vulnerability of alternative psychophysical procedures to the effects of presentation order. We show that different models of flanker facilitation can fit the data equally well, which stresses that succeeding at fitting a model does not validate it in any sense.
Departamento de Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense, Campus de Somosaguas, 28223, Madrid, Spain. miguel@psi.ucm.es
Miguel A
MA
García-Pérez
Rocío
R
Alcalá-Quintana
Russell L
RL
Woods
Eli
E
Peli
D001288:Attention; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011601:Psychophysics; D012684:Sensory Thresholds
Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(24):3108-19
17904188
Psychol Methods. 2004 Jun;9(2):250-71
15137892
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010 Feb;63(Pt 1):75-100
19422731
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Oct;67(7):1289-303
16502849
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2001 Sep;18(9):2228-36
11551058
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998 Aug;15(8):2046-51
9691486
Vision Res. 1995 Apr;35(8):1019-24
7762158
J Vis. 2009 May 04;9(5):2.1-15
19757880
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994 Jun;11(6):1710-9
8046537
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):471-7
9176957
J Vis. 2008 Apr 17;8(4):10.1-14
18484849
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1219-27
19633337
Vision Res. 1993 May;33(7):993-9
8506641
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Feb;69(2):254-62
17557595
J Vis. 2002;2(6):520-30
12678649
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):1155-78
20436208
Vision Res. 1998 Sep;38(17):2591-9
12116705
Spat Vis. 2009;22(4):273-300
19622285
J Vis. 2007 Aug 23;7(11):6.1-14
17997661
Vision Res. 2001 Dec;41(27):3663-75
11712981
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jun;64(6):1221-48
21337283
Span J Psychol. 2005 Nov;8(2):256-89
16255393
Vision Res. 2006 Mar;46(6-7):953-60
16274724
Vision Res. 2005 Oct;45(21):2728-39
16038960
Vision Res. 1998 Jun;38(12):1861-81
9797963
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1377-88
11800463
Vision Res. 2005 Jul;45(15):2009-24
15820518
Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):113-20
6844102
Hum Factors. 1979 Apr;21(2):225-8
489022
Ophthalmologica. 1988;196(1):43-8
3347470
Vision Res. 2000;40(3):279-86
10793901
Vision Res. 2004 Dec;44(27):3193-202
15482805
Vision Res. 1968 Sep;8(9):1245-63
5682796
Vision Res. 1999 Mar;39(5):987-92
10341950
J Vis. 2006 Feb 23;6(2):170-8
16522144
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 16;94(19):10426-31
9294227
Spat Vis. 2005;18(1):99-127
15807372
Spat Vis. 2007;20(1-2):5-43
17357714
Vision Res. 2002 Mar;42(6):733-45
11888539
Spat Vis. 2009;22(2):179-93
19228457
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Mar 7;268(1466):509-16
11296863
Vision Res. 2006 Jan;46(1-2):259-66
16289197
Spat Vis. 2000;13(4):431-48
11310536
Spat Vis. 2006;19(5):413-26
17131648
Vision Res. 1999 Aug;39(16):2729-37
10492833
J Vis. 2003;3(8):527-40
14632605
Spat Vis. 2001 Jun;14(2):201-15
11450803
Spat Vis. 2005;18(3):347-74
16060232
Optom Vis Sci. 2001 Jan;78(1):56-64
11233336
J Vis. 2002;2(3):243-55
12678586
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 15;91(4):1206-9
8108388
Vision Res. 1994 Jan;34(1):73-8
8116270
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Sep;2(9):1508-32
4045584
Spat Vis. 1999;12(2):143-62
10221425
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2007 May;60(Pt 1):147-74
17535585
Vision Res. 2009 Jul;49(14):1894-900
19426749
J Vis. 2010 Mar 25;10(3):8.1-14
20377285