Reproductive protein evolution in two cryptic species of marine chordate.
BACKGROUND
Reproductive character displacement (RCD) is a common and taxonomically widespread pattern. In marine broadcast spawning organisms, behavioral and mechanical isolation are absent and prezygotic barriers between species often operate only during the fertilization process. Such barriers are usually a consequence of differences in the way in which sperm and egg proteins interact, so RCD can be manifest as faster evolution of these proteins between species in sympatry than allopatry. Rapid evolution of these proteins often appears to be a consequence of positive (directional) selection. Here, we identify a set of candidate gamete recognition proteins (GRPs) in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis and showed that these GRPs evolve more rapidly than control proteins (those not involved in gamete recognition). Choosing a subset of these gamete recognition proteins that show evidence of positive selection (CIPRO37.40.1, CIPRO60.5.1, CIPRO100.7.1), we then directly test the RCD hypothesis by comparing divergence (omega) and polymorphism (McDonald-Kreitman, Tajima's D, Fu and Li's D and F, Fay and Wu's H) statistics in sympatric and allopatric populations of two distinct forms of C. intestinalis (Types A and B) between which there are strong post-zygotic barriers.


RESULTS
Candidate gamete recognition proteins from two lineages of C. intestinalis (Type A and B) are evolving more rapidly than control proteins, consistent with patterns seen in insects and mammals. However, ω (dN/dS) is not significantly different between the sympatric and allopatric populations, and none of the polymorphism statistics show significant differences between sympatric and allopatric populations.


CONCLUSIONS
Enhanced prezygotic isolation in sympatry has become a well-known feature of gamete recognition proteins in marine broadcast spawners. But in most cases the evolutionary process or processes responsible for this pattern have not been identified. Although gamete recognition proteins in C. intestinalis do appear to evolve more rapidly, on average, than proteins with other functions, rates of evolution are not different in allopatric and sympatric populations of the two reproductively isolated forms. That sympatry is probably human-mediated, and therefore recent, may explain the absence of RCD.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. mln32@cornell.edu
Marie L
ML
Nydam
Richard G
RG
Harrison
D000818:Animals; D059001:Aquatic Organisms / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D043344:Chordata / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005854:Germ Cells / Q000378:metabolism; D006801:Humans; D011110:Polymorphism, Genetic; D011506:Proteins / Q000235:genetics*; D012098:Reproduction
D011506:Proteins
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Sep 7;275(1646):1975-83
18495616
Evolution. 2008 Oct;62(10):2628-42
18637960
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 22;268(1471):1063-70
11375091
Mol Reprod Dev. 1997 Sep;48(1):137-43
9266770
Evolution. 1993 Dec;47(6):1637-1653
28568007
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 22;270(1527):1911-8
14561304
Evolution. 2004 Feb;58(2):308-23
15068348
Evolution. 2003 Dec;57(12):2721-41
14761052
Genetics. 2006 Mar;172(3):1411-25
16387887
Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652-4
1904993
Evolution. 2003 May;57(5):1049-60
12836822
Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):304-9
10659848
Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405-13
10880498
Evolution. 2004 May;58(5):1099-107
15212390
Mol Reprod Dev. 1992 Aug;32(4):383-8
1497886
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 29;104(22):9364-9
17517633
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Aug;56(2):718-26
20403444
Nature. 1995 Jun 22;375(6533):674-5
7791899
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Nov;19(11):1973-80
12411606
Evolution. 1998 Feb;52(1):200-208
28568163
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2375-85
16107593
Bioinformatics. 2003 Dec 12;19(18):2496-7
14668244
Evolution. 2009 May;63(5):1155-70
19210538
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Sep;27(9):2000-13
20375075
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1586-91
17483113
Evolution. 2007 Apr;61(4):772-83
17439610
Evolution. 1989 Mar;43(2):362-381
28568554
Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Mar;12(2):231-8
7700151
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000570
19629160
Am Nat. 2009 May;173(5):689-97
19298185
Mol Reprod Dev. 2002 Aug;62(4):431-45
12112576
J Evol Biol. 2008 May;21(3):761-72
18312316
Evolution. 2008 May;62(5):1192-203
18298640
Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Nov;83 ( Pt 5):503-8
10620021
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2456-60
267939
Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585-95
2513255
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Oct;17(10):1446-55
11018152
J Mol Evol. 2005 Nov;61(5):627-35
16205978
Evolution. 1997 Feb;51(1):295-303
28568795
Evolution. 2011 Feb;65(2):429-42
21044056
J Evol Biol. 2006 May;19(3):855-68
16674582
Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):693-709
8454210
Genetics. 2004 Nov;168(3):1457-65
15579698