Optical Properties of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Separated in a Density Gradient; Length, Bundling, and Aromatic Stacking Effects.
Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) are promising materials for in vitro and in vivo biological applications due to their high surface area and inherent near infrared photoluminescence and Raman scattering properties. Here, we use density gradient centrifugation to separate SWNTs by length and degree of bundling. Following separation, we observe a peak in photoluminescence quantum yield (PL QY) and Raman scattering intensity where SWNT length is maximized and bundling is minimized. Individualized SWNTs are found to exhibit high PL QY and high resonance-enhanced Raman scattering intensity. Fractions containing long, individual SWNTs exhibit the highest PL QY and Raman scattering intensities, compared to fractions containing single, short SWNTs or SWNT bundles. Intensity gains of approximately ~1.7 and 4-fold, respectively, are obtained compared with the starting material. Spectroscopic analysis reveals that SWNT fractions at higher displacement contain increasing proportions of SWNT bundles, which causes reduced optical transition energies and broadening of absorption features in the UV-Vis-NIR spectra, and reduced PL QY and Raman scattering intensity. Finally, we adsorb small aromatic species on "bright," individualized SWNT sidewalls and compare the resulting absorption, PL and Raman scattering effects to that of SWNT bundles. We observe similar effects in both cases, suggesting aromatic stacking affects the optical properties of SWNTs in an analogous way to SWNT bundles, likely due to electronic structure perturbations, charge transfer, and dielectric screening effects, resulting in reduction of the excitonic optical transition energies and exciton lifetimes.
Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94306.
Scott M
SM
Tabakman
Kevin
K
Welsher
Guosong
G
Hong
Hongjie
H
Dai
Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Feb 7;90(5):057404
12633397
J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Dec 8;126(48):15638-9
15571374
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Apr 28;96(16):167401
16712273
Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Sep 28;99(13):137402
17930635
Chemphyschem. 2008 Jul 14;9(10):1460-4
18506857
Nano Res. 2009 Feb 1;2(2):85-120
20174481
Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Oct 15;93(16):167401
15525030
ACS Nano. 2007 Aug;1(1):50-6
19203129
Science. 2002 Jul 26;297(5581):593-6
12142535
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 May 21;130(20):6551-5
18426207
Science. 2002 Dec 20;298(5602):2361-6
12459549
Chem Soc Rev. 2006 Jul;35(7):637-59
16791335
Nano Res. 2010 Jan 1;3(3):222-233
21442006
Nano Lett. 2008 Feb;8(2):586-90
18197719
Science. 2005 May 6;308(5723):838-41
15879212
J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Nov 10;126(44):14567-73
15521777
Nano Lett. 2005 Apr;5(4):713-8
15826114
Science. 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1319-23
19265015
Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Nov;4(11):773-80
19893526
J Am Chem Soc. 2001 Apr 25;123(16):3838-9
11457124
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Feb 9;838:29-45
9511793
Nano Lett. 2005 Mar;5(3):511-4
15755104
J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Jul 4;129(26):8058-9
17552526
J Phys Chem B. 2008 May 15;112(19):6211-3
18327930
Nano Lett. 2007 Sep;7(9):2650-4
17696559
Science. 2007 Jun 8;316(5830):1465-8
17556581
Nat Nanotechnol. 2006 Oct;1(1):60-5
18654143
Annu Rev Biochem. 1978;47:819-46
354506
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 12;103(50):18882-6
17135351
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov;26(11):1285-92
18953353
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 15;105(15):5844-9
18378895
ACS Nano. 2008 Nov 25;2(11):2291-300
19206395
Nano Lett. 2008 Apr;8(4):1047-54
18318507
J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Aug 29;129(34):10607-12
17672462
Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Apr 23;86(17):3895-8
11329351