Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: retrieval, behavior, and experience.
The tip-of-the-tongue state (TOT) is the feeling that accompanies temporary inaccessibility of an item that a person is trying to retrieve. TOTs have been studied experimentally since the seminal work of Brown and McNeill (1966). TOTs are experiences that accompany some failed or slow retrievals, and they can result in changes in retrieval behavior itself, allowing us to study the interplay among experience, retrieval, and behavior. We often attribute the experience of the TOT to the unretrieved target, but TOTs are based on a variety of cues, heuristics, or sources of evidence, such as partial information, related information, and cue familiarity, that predict the likelihood of overcoming retrieval failure. We present a synthesis of the direct-access view, which accounts for retrieval failure, and the heuristic-metacognitive view, which accounts for the experience of the TOT. We offer several avenues for future research and applications of TOT theory and data.
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, University Park, Miami, FL 33199, USA. bennett.schwartz@fiu.edu
Bennett L
BL
Schwartz
Janet
J
Metcalfe
D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000849:Anomia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D001364:Awareness; D002648:Child; D003463:Cues; D004410:Dyslexia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D008875:Middle Aged; D010700:Phonetics; D011582:Psychological Theory; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D014706:Verbal Learning; D055815:Young Adult
J Psycholinguist Res. 2008 May;37(3):171-98
18046649
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Aug;135(3):462-83
16846276
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):246-69
14736310
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):804-16
17063912
Exp Aging Res. 1998 Apr-Jun;24(2):139-53
9555567
Mem Cognit. 2001 Jan;29(1):117-26
11277455
Chem Senses. 2003 Sep;28(7):651-8
14578127
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):156-60
18605496
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):356-66
18189009
Mem Cognit. 1973 Sep;1(3):213-6
24214547
Mem Cognit. 1974 Jul;2(4):647-55
24203733
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1082-8
19966259
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Dec;15(4):634-54
17174788
Nature. 2006 Nov 23;444(7118):438
17122848
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Feb;17(1):82-7
20081165
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):15-23
19652018
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):204-23
2034750
Psychol Rev. 1993 Jan;100(1):3-22
8426880
Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;118(3):453-61
15174922
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55
16507066
Cognition. 1992 Oct;45(1):55-75
1424499
Psychol Sci. 2005 Nov;16(11):856-60
16262769
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Mar;127(1):55-68
9503651
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jun;38(4):452-60
20516225
Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):609-39
8255951
Am J Psychol. 1996 Spring;109(1):79-91
8714453
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Sep;6(3):379-93
12198776
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Nov;23(6):1410-23
9372608
Psychol Bull. 2003 May;129(3):394-413
12784936
Memory. 2009 Jul;17(5):493-501
19468957
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 29;362(1485):1601-13
17428778
Conscious Cogn. 2007 Jun;16(2):360-73
16798012
Psychol Aging. 1999 Sep;14(3):445-57
10509699
Mem Cognit. 1977 Jul;5(4):477-81
24203017
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Apr;61(4):535-42
18300185
Neuron. 2001 Aug 30;31(4):653-60
11545723
Biol Psychol. 2009 Apr;81(1):14-23
19428964
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):851-61
8345327
Memory. 2007 Feb;15(2):167-76
17534110
Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):1130-8
15670690
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jan;28(1):18-27
10714134
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jan;36(1):9-19
18323058
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Mar;9(3):479-89
12666772