Perceptual load-dependent neural correlates of distractor interference inhibition.
BACKGROUND
The load theory of selective attention hypothesizes that distractor interference is suppressed after perceptual processing (i.e., in the later stage of central processing) at low perceptual load of the central task, but in the early stage of perceptual processing at high perceptual load. Consistently, studies on the neural correlates of attention have found a smaller distractor-related activation in the sensory cortex at high relative to low perceptual load. However, it is not clear whether the distractor-related activation in brain regions linked to later stages of central processing (e.g., in the frontostriatal circuits) is also smaller at high rather than low perceptual load, as might be predicted based on the load theory.


RESULTS
We studied 24 healthy participants using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a visual target identification task with two perceptual loads (low vs. high). Participants showed distractor-related increases in activation in the midbrain, striatum, occipital and medial and lateral prefrontal cortices at low load, but distractor-related decreases in activation in the midbrain ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra (VTA/SN), striatum, thalamus, and extensive sensory cortices at high load.


CONCLUSIONS
Multiple levels of central processing involving midbrain and frontostriatal circuits participate in suppressing distractor interference at either low or high perceptual load. For suppressing distractor interference, the processing of sensory inputs in both early and late stages of central processing are enhanced at low load but inhibited at high load.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America. Jiansong.xu@yale.edu
Jiansong
J
Xu
John
J
Monterosso
Hedy
H
Kober
Iris M
IM
Balodis
Marc N
MN
Potenza
D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82
15668100
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
11994752
Neuroscientist. 2007 Dec;13(6):580-93
17911216
BMC Neurol. 2008 Sep 25;8:35
18817554
Science. 1996 Jan 26;271(5248):512-5
8560267
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Aug;28(2):287-99
18666141
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Sep;15(9):1290-8
15616129
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Nov;17(11):2625-33
17264254
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Feb;32(1):45-58
16478325
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68
7790827
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Apr;23(4):867-79
20350183
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;5(4):176-200
15543513
Neuron. 2007 Jul 5;55(1):157-67
17610824
Science. 2008 Feb 29;319(5867):1264-7
18309087
Childs Nerv Syst. 2002 Aug;18(8):386-404
12192499
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2109-28
17118927
Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 15;46(4):1194-9
19327403
Psychol Rev. 1980 May;87(3):272-300
7384344
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10223-8
17551017
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Dec;17(12):1819-28
16356321
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2399-413
17715196
Q J Exp Psychol. 1967 Feb;19(1):1-17
6041678
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):669-74
16447380
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):609-25
17086392
J Aud Res. 1981 Apr;21(2):93-104
6763609
Hear Res. 1993 Mar;66(1):46-52
8473245
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;92(1):622-9
14973320
Prog Neurobiol. 2004 Sep;74(1):1-58
15381316
Nature. 1998 Apr 9;392(6676):598-601
9560155
Prog Brain Res. 2008;172:517-42
18772049
Neuropharmacology. 2007 Oct;53(5):583-7
17709119
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005 Mar;30(3):610-7
15637640
Br J Psychol. 1969 Nov;60(4):453-7
5358947
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Dec;16(12):1783-9
16421331
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
11209064
Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;22(6):387-94
17416488
Trends Neurosci. 1990 Jul;13(7):266-71
1695401
Brain Cogn. 2000 Mar;42(2):183-200
10744919
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Mar;21(3):659-65
20699229
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Sep;7(9):992-6
15286791
Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2007 Oct;37(8):779-90
17922242
Int J Neurosci. 1991 Jun;58(3-4):171-82
1365040
J Gen Psychol. 1987 Oct;114(4):395-410
3323419
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2003 Oct;31(5):555-62
14561062
Percept Mot Skills. 2006 Apr;102(2):509-16
16826673
Neuroimage. 2001 Apr;13(4):684-701
11305897
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Nov;62(11):2126-32
19557667
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1996 Dec;18(6):843-63
9157109
Science. 1997 Feb 7;275(5301):835-8
9012351
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):377-81
17576274
Br J Psychol. 1975 Feb;66(1):61-8
1131480
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54
15355143
Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):263-76
16310964
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jun;18(6):932-48
16839301
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Jun;14(1):64-74
12063130
Int J Psychophysiol. 1999 Mar;31(3):197-217
10076774
Neuroimage. 2003 Jun;19(2 Pt 1):430-41
12814592
Biol Psychol. 2006 Jul;73(1):19-38
16546312
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;90(5):3384-97
12917383
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Jun;15(6):770-86
15459076
Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 1;42(1):393-403
18514546
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jun;29(12):2426-34
19490081
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Jul-Aug;84(4):386-93
1378008
Neuroimage. 2008 May 15;41(1):169-77
18378467
Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Jun;38(3):149-61
18539248
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(7):977-86
17445893
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Mar;22(3):437-46
19302005
Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1023-6
14963333
Science. 2001 Mar 2;291(5509):1803-6
11230699
Neuroscientist. 2004 Dec;10(6):525-37
15534038
Psychol Rev. 1963 Jan;70:80-90
14027390
J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14311-9
19109512
Q J Exp Psychol. 1967 Nov;19(4):362-7
6080925
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1970;33:381-93
5445969
Percept Psychophys. 1994 Aug;56(2):183-97
7971119
Neuroreport. 2008 Jan 22;19(2):151-4
18185099
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002 Sep;39(2-3):181-215
12423766
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):103-7
18066057
Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):509-13
17346967