Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.
Following training to match 2- and 8-sec durations of feederlight to red and green comparisons with a 0-sec baseline delay, pigeons were allowed to choose to take a memory test or to escape the memory test. The effects of sample omission, increases in retention interval, and variation in trial spacing on selection of the escape option and accuracy were studied. During initial testing, escaping the test did not increase as the task became more difficult, and there was no difference in accuracy between chosen and forced memory tests. However, with extended training, accuracy for chosen tests was significantly greater than for forced tests. In addition, two pigeons exhibited higher accuracy on chosen tests than on forced tests at the short retention interval and greater escape rates at the long retention interval. These results have not been obtained in previous studies with pigeons when the choice to take the test or to escape the test is given before test stimuli are presented. It appears that task-specific methodological factors may determine whether a particular species will exhibit the two behavioral effects that were initially proposed as potentially indicative of metacognition.
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3C5.
Allison
A
Adams
Angelo
A
Santi
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D010856:Columbidae / Q000502:physiology*; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors
Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):286-92
17110057
Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):551-5
17346969
Behav Brain Sci. 2003 Jun;26(3):317-39; discussion 340-73
14968691
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Sep;127(3):227-50
9742715
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):679-91
18792496
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5359-62
11274360
Anim Cogn. 2004 Oct;7(4):239-46
15105996
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2009 Jan 1;4:17-28
20046911
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):64-71
17362380
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Apr;32(2):111-9
16634654
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):282-97
16719654
Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):184-9
16460887
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Apr;34(2):266-82
18426309
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):575-85
19242741
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jul;35(3):371-81
19594282
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2009;4:1-16
26516391
Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):75-97
8997171