Age differences in the use of beneficial and misleading cues in recall: with a comment on the measurement of between-group differences in accuracy.
Young and old subjects were tested on their memory for paired-associate terms when cued with either facilitative or misleading word stems. After studying a long list of pairs of unrelated words (e.g., hair-turtle), recall of a particular target term was cued in a facilitative manner (hair-tu____) or a misleading manner (hair-ta____). The effects of these cues were assessed relative to a baseline condition in which levels of performance lay between the other two (hair-t____). To interpret the age-related effects of the facilitative and misleading cues relative to baseline, the variance in differences between the baseline and the experimental conditions related to the overall baseline level was factored out, and age-related differences as a function of cue were assessed on the remaining variability. This analysis revealed that the two age groups differed both in their ability to overcome the adverse effects of the misleading cue and also to take advantage of the benefits afforded by the facilitative cue. This combination of results is consistent with the view that aging results in a loss of general strategic control, and not specifically inhibitory control, over the effects of retrieval cues.
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA. ASBENJAM@UIUC.EDU
Aaron S
AS
Benjamin
D000368:Aged; D000375:Aging / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D055815:Young Adult
Psychol Aging. 1992 Dec;7(4):632-42
1466832
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jan;37(1):52-64
19103975
Mem Cognit. 2003 Mar;31(2):297-305
12749471
Biometrika. 1947;34(1-2):28-35
20287819
Psychol Rev. 2009 Jan;116(1):84-115
19159149
Psychol Aging. 1999 Mar;14(1):122-34
10224637
Biometrika. 1948 May;35(Pts 1-2):88-96
18867415
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):874-9
16524004
Psychol Bull. 1999 Nov;125(6):777-99
10589302
Psychol Aging. 1992 Jun;7(2):257-70
1610515