Comparative analysis of information contents relevant to recognition of introns in many species.
BACKGROUND
The basic process of RNA splicing is conserved among eukaryotic species. Three signals (5' and 3' splice sites and branch site) are commonly used to directly conduct splicing, while other features are also related to the recognition of an intron. Although there is experimental evidence pointing to the significant species specificities in the features of intron recognition, a quantitative evaluation of the divergence of these features among a wide variety of eukaryotes has yet to be conducted.


RESULTS
To better understand the splicing process from the viewpoints of evolution and information theory, we collected introns from 61 diverse species of eukaryotes and analyzed the properties of the nucleotide sequences relevant to splicing. We found that trees individually constructed from the five features (the three signals, intron length, and nucleotide composition within an intron) roughly reflect the phylogenetic relationships among the species but sometimes extensively deviate from the species classification. The degree of topological deviation of each feature tree from the reference trees indicates the lowest discordance for the 5' splicing signal, followed by that for the 3' splicing signal, and a considerably greater discordance for the other three features. We also estimated the relative contributions of the five features to short intron recognition in each species. Again, moderate correlation was observed between the similarities in pattern of short intron recognition and the genealogical relationships among the species. When mammalian introns were categorized into three subtypes according to their terminal dinucleotide sequences, each subtype segregated into a nearly monophyletic group, regardless of the host species, with respect to the 5' and 3' splicing signals. It was also found that GC-AG introns are extraordinarily abundant in some species with high genomic G + C contents, and that the U12-type spliceosome might make a greater contribution than currently estimated in most species.


CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the present study indicates that both splicing signals themselves and their relative contributions to short intron recognition are rather susceptible to evolutionary changes, while some poorly characterized properties seem to be preserved within the mammalian intron subtypes. Our findings may afford additional clues to understanding of evolution of splicing mechanisms.
Department of Intelligence Science and Technology, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Yoshida Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Hiroaki
H
Iwata
Osamu
O
Gotoh
D000818:Animals; D001482:Base Composition / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D006801:Humans; D007438:Introns / Q000235:genetics*; D010802:Phylogeny; D012326:RNA Splicing / Q000235:genetics
Genome Biol. 2004;5(2):R7
14759257
Cell. 1983 Jun;33(2):519-27
6305513
Cell. 1997 May 30;89(5):781-7
9182766
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Oct 1;29(19):4006-13
11574683
Genome Res. 2000 Apr;10(4):516-22
10779491
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Oct;5(10):773-82
15510168
Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Aug;13(4):365-76
9283751
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Aug 15;28(16):3003-10
10931913
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 1;25(13):1587-93
19414532
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Nov;10(11):741-54
19773805
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Dec;4(12):960-70
14685174
Genes Dev. 2006 Jul 1;20(13):1679-84
16818600
RNA. 2004 Feb;10(2):240-53
14730023
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Aug 1;31(15):4561-72
12888517
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jul 15;30(14):3059-66
12136088
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11193-8
11572975
Biol Direct. 2008 May 21;3:20
18495041
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Feb 15;6:31
15713233
Genome Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):88-103
18032728
Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 May 25;18(10):3015-9
2349097
Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:291-336
12626338
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 May;36(9):3001-10
18390578
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(14):3955-67
16914448
Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:387-419
2977088
Mol Cell Biol. 1988 May;8(5):2042-51
3386632
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7188-96
17947321
Mol Cell. 1998 Dec;2(6):773-85
9885565
Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Oct 15;26(20):4748-57
9753745
Bioinformatics. 2008 Nov 1;24(21):2438-44
18728043
Nature. 1980 Feb 28;283(5750):835-40
6987524
Cell. 1997 Dec 26;91(7):875-9
9428511
J Mol Evol. 2008 Dec;67(6):594-607
19030770
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Apr;22(4):1053-66
15659557
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Sep;6(9):699-708
16151375
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jun 15;23(12):1556-8
17459965
J Mol Biol. 1997 Apr 25;268(1):78-94
9149143
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Apr 1;30(7):1427-64
11917006
Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Jun 1;14(11):1559-68
15857856
Cell. 1989 Aug 11;58(3):473-83
2758463
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 8;102(45):16176-81
16260721
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Apr 25;9:212
18439255
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Mar;27(3):684-93
19942614
J Mol Evol. 1999 Sep;49(3):376-84
10473779
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D136-40
18953034
Science. 2003 Nov 21;302(5649):1401-4
14631042
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 May;36(8):2630-8
18344523