Long-distance effects of insertional mutagenesis.
BACKGROUND
Most common systems of genetic engineering of mammalian cells are associated with insertional mutagenesis of the modified cells. Insertional mutagenesis is also a popular approach to generate random alterations for gene discovery projects. A better understanding of the interaction of the structural elements within an insertional mutagen and the ability of such elements to influence host genes at various distances away from the insertion site is a matter of considerable practical importance.


RESULTS
We observed that, in the context of a lentiviral construct, a transcript, which is initiated at an internal CMV promoter/enhancer region and incorporates a splice donor site, is able to extend past a collinear viral LTR and trap exons of host genes, while the polyadenylation signal, which is naturally present in the LTR, is spliced out. Unexpectedly, when a vector, which utilizes this phenomenon, was used to produce mutants with elevated activity of NF-κB, we found mutants, which owed their phenotype to the effect of the insert on a gene located tens or even hundreds of kilobases away from the insertion site. This effect did not result from a CMV-driven transcript, but was sensitive to functional suppression of the insert. Interestingly, despite the long-distance effect, expression of loci most closely positioned to the insert appeared unaffected.


CONCLUSIONS
We concluded that a polyadenylation signal in a retroviral LTR, when occurring within an intron, is an inefficient barrier against the formation of a hybrid transcript, and that a vector containing a strong enhancer may selectively affect the function of genes far away from its insertion site. These phenomena have to be considered when experimental or therapeutic transduction is performed. In particular, the long-distance effects of insertional mutagenesis bring into question the relevance of the lists of disease-associated retroviral integration targets, which did not undergo functional validation.
Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Ruchi
R
Singhal
Xiaotao
X
Deng
Alex A
AA
Chenchik
Eugene S
ES
Kandel
D005818:Genetic Engineering / Q000379:methods*; D005822:Genetic Vectors; D006801:Humans; D007438:Introns; D016254:Mutagenesis, Insertional / Q000379:methods*; D026723:Polyadenylation; D012333:RNA, Messenger / Q000235:genetics; D012190:Retroviridae / Q000235:genetics; D020079:Terminal Repeat Sequences
D012333:RNA, Messenger
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jan 6;101(1):192-7
14691254
Nat Med. 2006 Apr;12(4):401-9
16582916
Cell Cycle. 2008 Jul 15;7(14):2081-2
18668995
Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jan;7(1):379-87
3031469
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 May;13(5):385-6
16738604
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 16;107(7):3001-5
20133699
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 3;102(18):6425-30
15851657
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 12;97(19):10489-93
10962024
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D523-7
14681473
J Clin Invest. 2008 Sep;118(9):3143-50
18688286
Science. 1992 Feb 14;255(5046):841-5
1371365
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 16;348(3):255-6
12529469
Cell Cycle. 2008 Jul 15;7(14):2249-56
18635966
Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jun 25;18(12):3587-96
2194165
J Virol. 1993 Oct;67(10):6265-9
7690423
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 22;106(38):16339-44
19805303
Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Jul;19(7):4643-52
10373513
PLoS One. 2008 Sep 04;3(9):e3144
18769545
Anal Biochem. 2005 Aug 1;343(1):116-24
15955524
Methods Mol Biol. 2003;221:41-9
12703732
Mol Cell. 2006 Mar 17;21(6):849-59
16543153
Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Mar;30(6):1411-20
20065031
J Gene Med. 1999 Jan-Feb;1(1):4-12
10738580
Mol Cell. 2002 Dec;10(6):1495-502
12504023
Science. 2003 Oct 17;302(5644):415-9
14564000
Blood. 2007 Sep 1;110(5):1448-57
17456723
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 May;21(5):841-50
14963095
Retrovirology. 2008 Jan 14;5:4
18194563