Electrosensitive spatial vectors in elasmobranch fishes: implications for source localization.
The electrosense of sharks and rays is used to detect weak dipole-like bioelectric fields of prey, mates and predators, and several models propose a use for the detection of streaming ocean currents and swimming-induced fields for geomagnetic orientation. We assessed pore distributions, canal vectors, complementarity and possible evolutionary divergent functions for ampullary clusters in two sharks, the scalloped hammerhead (Sphyrna lewini) and the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus), and the brown stingray (Dasyatis lata). Canal projections were determined from measured coordinates of each electrosensory pore and corresponding ampulla relative to the body axis. These species share three ampullary groups: the buccal (BUC), mandibular (MAN) and superficial ophthalmic (SO), which is subdivided into anterior (SOa) and posterior (SOp) in sharks. The stingray also has a hyoid (HYO) cluster. The SOp in both sharks contains the longest (most sensitive) canals with main projections in the posterior-lateral quadrants of the horizontal plane. In contrast, stingray SO canals are few and short with the posterior-lateral projections subsumed by the HYO. There was strong projection coincidence by BUC and SOp canals in the posterior lateral quadrant of the hammerhead shark, and laterally among the stingray BUC and HYO. The shark SOa and stingray SO and BUC contain short canals located anterior to the mouth for detection of prey at close distance. The MAN canals of all species project in anterior or posterior directions behind the mouth and likely coordinate prey capture. Vertical elevation was greatest in the BUC of the sandbar shark, restricted by the hammerhead cephalofoil and extremely limited in the dorsoventrally flattened stingray. These results are consistent with the functional subunit hypothesis that predicts specialized ampullary functions for processing of weak dipole and geomagnetic induced fields, and provides an anatomical basis for future experiments on central processing of different forms of relevant electric stimuli.
Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Ariel C
AC
Rivera-Vicente
Josiah
J
Sewell
Timothy C
TC
Tricas
D000818:Animals; D018940:Elasmobranchii / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D011235:Predatory Behavior
J Exp Biol. 1999 May;202(# (Pt 10)):1357-64
10210676
J Comp Physiol A. 1993 Oct;173(4):401-14
8254566
J Exp Biol. 2005 Nov;208(Pt 22):4213-22
16272244
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Feb;191(2):115-23
15711967
J Comp Physiol A. 1990 Jul;167(2):285-94
2213658
J Comp Physiol A. 1998 Jul;183(1):87-99
9691481
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;638:25-38
9421577
J Exp Biol. 1962 Mar;39:119-28
14477490
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1966;264:1-60
5911901
J Acoust Soc Am. 1973 Jul;54(1):157-73
4738624
J Comp Neurol. 1984 Jun 1;225(4):581-90
6736290
J Exp Biol. 1971 Oct;55(2):371-83
5114029
J Exp Biol. 2002 Apr;205(Pt 7):999-1007
11916995
J Exp Biol. 1996 Nov;199(Pt 11):2383-93
9114503
J Neurosci. 1981 Jan;1(1):40-8
7346557
Neurosci Lett. 1995 Dec 29;202(1-2):129-32
8787848
J Morphol. 1986 Sep;189(3):225-247
29929341
Science. 1982 Nov 26;218(4575):916-8
7134985
J Neurosci. 2000 Nov 15;20(22):8586-95
11069967
J Exp Biol. 2002 Dec;205(Pt 23):3609-21
12409487
J Comp Physiol A. 1998 Jan;182(1):89-101
9447716
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Jun;3(6):e113
17571918
J Exp Biol. 1987 Jul;130:359-67
3625122
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Jun;65(6 Pt 1):061903
12188755
Brain Behav Evol. 1990;36(4):196-215
2279234