Dietary energy density and adiposity: employing bias adjustments in a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
BACKGROUND
Dietary studies differ in design and quality making it difficult to compare results. This study quantifies the prospective association between dietary energy density (DED) and adiposity in children using a meta-analysis method that adjusts for differences in design and quality through eliciting and incorporating expert opinion on the biases and their uncertainty.


METHODS
Six prospective studies identified by a previous systematic literature search were included. Differences in study quality and design were considered respectively as internal and external biases and captured in bias checklists. Study results were converted to correlation coefficients; biases were considered either additive or proportional on this scale. The extent and uncertainty of the internal and external biases in each study were elicited in a formal process by five quantitatively-trained assessors and five subject-matter specialists. Biases for each study were combined across assessors using median pooling and results combined across studies by random-effects meta-analysis.


RESULTS
The unadjusted combined correlation between DED and adiposity change was 0.06 (95%CI 0.01, 0.11; p = 0.013), but with considerable heterogeneity (I² = 52%). After bias-adjustment the pooled correlation was 0.17 (95%CI - 0.11, 0.45; p = 0.24), and the studies were apparently compatible (I² = 0%).


CONCLUSIONS
This method allowed quantitative synthesis of the prospective association between DED and adiposity change in children, which is important for the development of evidence-informed policy. Bias adjustment increased the magnitude of the positive association but the widening confidence interval reflects the uncertainty of the assessed biases and implies that higher quality studies are required.
Medical Research Council Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, UK.
Désirée C
DC
Wilks
Adrian P
AP
Mander
Susan A
SA
Jebb
Simon G
SG
Thompson
Stephen J
SJ
Sharp
Rebecca M
RM
Turner
Anna Karin
AK
Lindroos
D050154:Adiposity / Q000502:physiology; D000328:Adult; D015982:Bias; D002648:Child; D004032:Diet; D002149:Energy Intake; D004734:Energy Metabolism; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015596:Nutrition Assessment; D009765:Obesity
Obes Res. 2001 Nov;9 Suppl 4:239S-243S
11707548
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Jan;14(1):106-14
16493128
Obes Rev. 2009 Nov;10(6):681-92
19413706
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):21-47
19381328
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;88(6):1459-68
19064504
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e17205
21383837
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 May;87(5):1230-7
18469244
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Apr;32(4):586-93
17912267
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Sep;88(3):693-9
18779285
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998 Oct;22(10):980-7
9806313
Risk Anal. 2000 Apr;20(2):155-6
10859775
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Jul;26(7):947-52
12080448
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Sep;88(3):677-84
18779283
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
12958120
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Jan;83(1):11-7
16400043
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Oct;14(10):1795-801
17062810
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jun;85(6):1478-85
17556682
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Sep;88(3):769-77
18779295