Anatomic attachment of the ACL. Comparison between radiological and CT analysis.
OBJECTIVE
The following hypothesis was tested: the location of the tibial and femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) attachments will differ according to the measurement technique (plain radiographs or CT-scan) in relation to the anatomic frame of reference.


METHODS
10 gross specimens were studied. The location of metallic reference pins implanted around the tibial and femoral ACL attachments was recorded with reference to the bone contours with a caliper on the anatomic preparation, with standard plain AP and lateral radiographs and with a CT-scan. Results were compared with appropriate statistical tests at a 0.05 level of significance.


RESULTS
The mean ratio between the antero-posterior tibia measurement and the center of the ACL tibial attachment varied from 50 to 52%. The mean ratio between the medio-lateral tibia measurement and the center of the ACL tibial attachment varied from 49 to 51%. The mean ratio between the antero-posterior femur measurement and the center of the ACL femoral attachment varied from 74 to 80%. The results were significantly different between the three techniques (respectively P = 0.003, P = 0.02 and P = 0.045).


CONCLUSIONS
The paired differences were small (3% at the tibia, 6% at the femur). There was a strong correlation and a good agreement between the three techniques. It is likely that the small differences on the tibia have few, if any, clinical relevance.


CONCLUSIONS
Both radiographic and CT-scan measurement techniques used during the present study have the potential to be used as quality control after ACL replacement.


METHODS
Diagnostic study-investigating a diagnostic test. Development of diagnostic criteria in a consecutive series of patients and a universally applied "gold" standard, Level II.
Centre de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de la Main, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 10 Avenue Baumann, 67400, Illkirch, France. jean-yves.jenny@chru-strasbourg.fr
Jean-Yves
JY
Jenny
Eugène
E
Ciobanu
Philippe
P
Clavert
Jean-Henri
JH
Jaeger
Jean-Luc
JL
Kahn
Jean-François
JF
Kempf
D016118:Anterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D002102:Cadaver; D005269:Femur / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D013977:Tibia / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Nov;18(11):1599-606
20585754
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun;92(6):1427-31
20516318
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6 Suppl 1:S13-5
9608457
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Apr;17(4):347-51
19023561
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Jan;18(1):52-5
19565218
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Sep;17(9):1089-94
19526223
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Oct;(283):187-95
1395244
Arthroscopy. 2010 Sep;26(9 Suppl):S13-20
20667684
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Nov;88(11):1513-8
17075100
Arthroscopy. 2009 Jan;25(1):54-61
19111219
Biomed Sci Instrum. 1997;33:321-5
9731379
Arthroscopy. 2006 Apr;22(4):356-61
16581446
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Oct;14(10):982-92
16897068
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(4):207-13
10975260
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):2368-76
19687513
Arthroscopy. 2004 Nov;20(9):946-50
15525927
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9(1):28-33
11269581
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Mar;17(3):213-9
19139847
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 May;13(4):256-62
15682348
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Feb;90(2):172-9
18256083
Arthroscopy. 2006 Sep;22(9):984-92
16952729