[Medical relevance of magnetic fields in pain therapy].
BACKGROUND
Magnetic and electromagnetic fields have been accepted as real physical entities in medicine and are believed to achieve pain relief. Magnetic field therapy has been acknowledged as a non-invasive, safe and simple method for treatment of the site of injury, source of pain or inflammation, or other types of illnesses and pathologies. However, a consensus regarding the statistical relevance of the effects has not been established.


METHODS
A detailed literature research was performed and the results were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were that the studies had to be randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, and no additional forms of treatment other than magnetic effects were allowed to be used.


RESULTS
The evaluation of 17 studies with static magnetic fields showed on average no significant difference in pain relief between the group treated with magnetic fields and the placebo group. All studies using magnetic fields showed that forms of treatment conducted over a period of 30 min and at intervals of 1 week have no effects. In 10 studies with dynamic magnetic fields different effects were registered, which ranged from no effect to significant differences regarding pain relief between the treated and the control groups.


CONCLUSIONS
Static magnetic fields are ineffective with respect to pain therapy. Dynamic magnetic fields show diverse effects. Hence, this therapy should be researched in depth.
Radiologietechnologie, Fachhochschule Campus Wien. gabriele.salomonowitz@fh-campuswien.ac.at
G
G
Salomonowitz
M
M
Friedrich
B J
BJ
Güntert
D018849:Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; D006801:Humans; D055909:Magnetic Field Therapy; D059408:Pain Management; D010147:Pain Measurement; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Electromagn Biol Med. 2007;26(1):1-23
17454079
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jul;90(7):1102-9
19577022
J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40
3068365
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Sep;80(9):1138-45
16178493
BMJ. 2004 Dec 18;329(7480):1450-4
15604181
Acta Med Austriaca. 2000;27(3):61-8
10897384
Evid Based Nurs. 2008 Apr;11(2):49
18364419
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jun;125(6):1620-1629
20527063
Pain Res Manag. 2006 Summer;11(2):85-90
16770449
JAMA. 2003 Sep 17;290(11):1474-8
13129987
Diabetes Metab. 2008 Sep;34(4 Pt 1):349-54
18585071
Anesth Analg. 2007 Feb;104(2):290-4
17242082
Electromagn Biol Med. 2007;26(3):257-74
17886012
JAMA. 2000 Mar 8;283(10):1322-5
10714732
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974;238:149-70
4548329
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Oct;82(10):1453-60
11588753
Neurosci Lett. 2004 Jun 10;363(2):157-62
15172106
Bioelectromagnetics. 1991;12(2):71-5
2039557
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Nov;78(11):1200-3
9365349
Altern Ther Health Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;10(2):36-43
15055092
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1581-7
12501067
J Fam Pract. 2002 Jan;51(1):38-40
11927062
Pain Res Manag. 2007 Winter;12(4):249-58
18080043
J Int Med Res. 2006 Mar-Apr;34(2):160-7
16749411
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 May;84(5):736-46
12736891
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
8721797
J Altern Complement Med. 2001 Feb;7(1):53-64
11246937
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Apr;102(4):1410-5
17194733
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Jul;13(7):575-81
15979009
CMAJ. 2007 Sep 25;177(7):736-42
17893349
Acta Orthop Belg. 1978 Sep-Oct;44(5):706-24
380258
J Rehabil Med. 2005 Nov;37(6):372-7
16287669
Biomed Sci. 1990 Mar;1(3):245-50
2103827
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Mar;86(3):565-70
15759245