Cost-effectiveness of image-guided spine surgery.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if image-guided spine surgery is cost effective.


METHODS
A prospective case series of the first 100 patients undergoing thoracolumbar pedicle screw instrumentation under image-guidance was compared to a retrospective control group of the last 100 patients who underwent screw placement prior to the use of image-guidance. The image-guidance system was NaviVision (Vector Vision-BrainLAB) and Arcadis Orbic (Siemens).


RESULTS
The rate of revision surgery was reduced from 3% to 0% with the use of image guidance (p=0.08). The cost savings of image guidance for the placement of pedicle screws was $71,286 per 100 cases. Time required for pedicle screw placement with image guidance was 20 minutes for 2 screws, 29 minutes for 4 screws, 38 minutes for 6 screws, and 50 min for 8 screws. Cost savings for the time required for placement of pedicle screws with image guidance can be estimated by subtracting the time required with currently used techniques without image guidance from the above averages, then multiplying by $93 per minute. The approximate costs of the navigation system is $475,000 ( $225,000 for Vector Vision-BrainLAB and $250,000 for Arcadis Orbic-Siemens).


CONCLUSIONS
Image guidance for the placement of pedicle screws may be cost effective in spine practices with heavy volume, that perform surgery in difficult cases, and that require long surgical times for the placement of pedicle screws.
Marina Spine Center, 13160 Mindanao Way, Suite 325, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA.
Robert Green
RG
Watkins
Akash
A
Gupta
Robert Green
RG
Watkins
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Feb 15;26(4):352-9
11224881
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005 Jun;17(2):178-94
16007385
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 1;30(15):1793-8
16094283
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Feb 15;22(4):452-8
9055375
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S54-61
12897475
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Jun 1;21(11):1320-4
8725923
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Sep;13(9):1012-8
3206294
Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Feb;64(1):28-32
8451940
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Nov;18(15):2231-8; discussion 2238-9
8278838
Spine J. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):584-90
18586198
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2905-9
18246016
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2108-15
18777603
Eur Spine J. 2000 Jun;9(3):235-40
10905443
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2503-8
12435982
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jul 1;20(13):1494-9
8623069
Neurosurgery. 2001 Apr;48(4):771-8; discussion 778-9
11322437
Eur Spine J. 1997;6(6):402-5
9455669
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Aug 1;31(17):2024-7; discussion 2028
16924222
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16 Suppl):S33-43
16103832
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Oct 15;23(20):2215-20; discussion 2220-1
9802164
J Spinal Disord. 1996 Aug;9(4):334-8
8877962
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 1;30(17):1989-97
16135991
Orthop Rev. 1994 Jun;23(6):511-6
8065808
J Neurosurg. 1995 Oct;83(4):641-7
7674014
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 15;25(20):2637-45
11034650
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Sep;(354):39-48
9755762
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1996 Apr;7(2):171-86
8726434
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):E111-20
17268254
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jan;15(1):11-4
2326693
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Feb;(203):7-17
3955999
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jun 1;22(11):1254-8
9201865
J Spinal Disord. 1993 Jun;6(3):225-31
8347972
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Mar 1;25(5):615-21
10749639