Phase-selective image reconstruction of the lungs in small animals using Micro-CT.
Gating in small animal imaging can compensate for artifacts due to physiological motion. This paper presents a strategy for sampling and image reconstruction in the rodent lung using micro-CT. The approach involves rapid sampling of free-breathing mice without any additional hardware to detect respiratory motion. The projection images are analyzed post-acquisition to derive a respiratory signal, which is used to provide weighting factors for each projection that favor a selected phase of the respiration (e.g. end-inspiration or end-expiration) for the reconstruction. Since the sampling cycle and the respiratory cycle are uncorrelated, the sets of projections corresponding to any of the selected respiratory phases do not have a regular angular distribution. This drastically affects the image quality of reconstructions based on simple filtered backprojection. To address this problem, we use an iterative reconstruction algorithm that combines the Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique with Total Variation minimization (SART-TV). At each SART-TV iteration, backprojection is performed with a set of weighting factors that favor the desired respiratory phase. To reduce reconstruction time, the algorithm is implemented on a graphics processing unit. The performance of the proposed approach was investigated in simulations and in vivo scans of mice with primary lung cancers imaged with our in-house developed dual tube/detector micro-CT system. We note that if the ECG signal is acquired during sampling, the same approach could be used for phase-selective cardiac imaging.
Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Dept. of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
S M
SM
Johnston
B A
BA
Perez
D G
DG
Kirsch
C T
CT
Badea
Cancer Res. 2005 Nov 15;65(22):10280-8
16288016
Eur Radiol. 2008 Jul;18(7):1375-84
18431578
Invest Radiol. 2007 Feb;42(2):85-94
17220726
Methods. 2010 Jan;50(1):42-9
19651213
Exp Lung Res. 2007 Apr-May;33(3-4):169-83
17558678
Med Phys. 2004 Dec;31(12):3324-9
15651615
Mol Imaging Biol. 2004 May-Jun;6(3):149-59
15193249
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jun 21;54(12):3837-46
19491456
Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4476-83
18072512
Med Phys. 2005 Sep;32(9):2888-98
16266103
Mol Imaging. 2005 Apr-Jun;4(2):110-6
16105509
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2008 Apr 18;6913:691342
22049304