Feature extraction and selection for objective gait analysis and fall risk assessment by accelerometry.
BACKGROUND
Falls in the elderly is nowadays a major concern because of their consequences on elderly general health and moral states. Moreover, the aging of the population and the increasing life expectancy make the prediction of falls more and more important. The analysis presented in this article makes a first step in this direction providing a way to analyze gait and classify hospitalized elderly fallers and non-faller. This tool, based on an accelerometer network and signal processing, gives objective informations about the gait and does not need any special gait laboratory as optical analysis do. The tool is also simple to use by a non expert and can therefore be widely used on a large set of patients.


METHODS
A population of 20 hospitalized elderlies was asked to execute several classical clinical tests evaluating their risk of falling. They were also asked if they experienced any fall in the last 12 months. The accelerations of the limbs were recorded during the clinical tests with an accelerometer network distributed on the body. A total of 67 features were extracted from the accelerometric signal recorded during a simple 25 m walking test at comfort speed. A feature selection algorithm was used to select those able to classify subjects at risk and not at risk for several classification algorithms types.


RESULTS
The results showed that several classification algorithms were able to discriminate people from the two groups of interest: fallers and non-fallers hospitalized elderlies. The classification performances of the used algorithms were compared. Moreover a subset of the 67 features was considered to be significantly different between the two groups using a t-test.


CONCLUSIONS
This study gives a method to classify a population of hospitalized elderlies in two groups: at risk of falling or not at risk based on accelerometric data. This is a first step to design a risk of falling assessment system that could be used to provide the right treatment as soon as possible before the fall and its consequences. This tool could also be used to evaluate the risk several times during the revalidation procedure.
Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. benoit.caby@uclouvain.be
Benoit
B
Caby
Suzanne
S
Kieffer
Marie
M
de Saint Hubert
Gerald
G
Cremer
Benoit
B
Macq
D000054:Acceleration; D000058:Accidental Falls; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000465:Algorithms; D005080:Exercise Test / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:1367-70
18002218
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
1991946
Exp Brain Res. 2003 May;150(1):25-32
12698213
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2006 Aug;39(4):288-91
16900448
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Oct;50(10):1629-37
12366615
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Jun;55(6):1658-65
18714829
Age Ageing. 2006 Sep;35 Suppl 2:ii42-ii45
16926203
J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94
8126356
Stroke. 2009 Jan;40(1):163-8
18948606
Age Ageing. 2004 May;33(3):273-9
15082433
J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Jan 30;167(2):340-8
17928063
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 15;88(6):2297-301
11607165
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:3682-5
19163511
J Aging Health. 1993 May;5(2):229-43
10125446
Physiol Meas. 2006 Nov;27(11):1081-90
17028403
Acta Otolaryngol. 1959 Mar-Apr;50(2):95-108
13636842
N Engl J Med. 1997 Aug 28;337(9):613-8
9271485
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Jun;45(6):735-8
9180669
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2005 Mar-Apr;40(2):201-11
15680502
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986 Feb;34(2):119-26
3944402
Am Fam Physician. 2000 Apr 1;61(7):2159-68, 2173-4
10779256
Biol Cybern. 1993;70(1):75-80
8312399
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 May;58(5):M446-52
12730255