Long-term treatment outcome of presurgical nasoalveolar molding in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).


METHODS
Twenty-five patients with UCLP treated by either PNAM or non-PNAM therapy between 1998 and 2003 were recruited in the study. During the clinical examination and data analysis, the evaluators were blinded to which patients received PNAM. The patients were reviewed clinically, and their facial morphology was captured with a three-dimensional scanner. Their dental arch configuration and occlusion were recorded by plaster dental models. After the patient evaluations and measurements were completed, the patient list was unblinded. There were 20 patients in the PNAM group and 5 patients in the non-PNAM group. Fisher exact tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the outcomes.


RESULTS
Clinically, the improvement in the PNAM group was most evident in nasal and lip anatomy. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups on each of the measurements on three-dimensional facial images and dental models.


CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggests a trend toward a long-term clinical improvement in nasal and lip anatomy of UCLP patients treated with PNAM. However, these improved results were not confirmed by three-dimensional stereophotography. There was no statistically significant difference in the long-term three-dimensional anthropometric measurements and dental model analysis between the PNAM group and the non-PNAM group.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, the University of Health Science Center at Houston, Texas, USA.
Stacey L
SL
Clark
John F
JF
Teichgraeber
Ruth G
RG
Fleshman
Joi D
JD
Shaw
Carmen
C
Chavarria
Chung-How
CH
Kau
Jaime
J
Gateno
James J
JJ
Xia
D002971:Cleft Lip / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D002972:Cleft Palate / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D003765:Models, Dental; D010158:Palatal Obturators; D010781:Photography; D011300:Preoperative Care; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999 Sep;36(5):391-7
10499400
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002 Jan;39(1):26-9
11772166
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;67(10):2080-92
19761902
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 May;43(3):321-8
16681405
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001 May;38(3):193-8
11386426
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;13(1):25-39
15820428
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Mar;123(3):1002-1006
19319066
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999 Nov;36(6):486-98
10574667
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Feb;61(2):222-7
12619001
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Sep;104(3):616-30
10456510
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Jan;33(1):23-30; discussion 30-1
8849855
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Mar;71(3):301-2
8164174
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;65(4):728-34
17368370
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994 Jan;31(1):68-73
8130245
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975 May;55(5):596-601
1144536
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;67(10):2093-106
19761903
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Jan;44(1):8-12
17214541
Br J Plast Surg. 1991 Jan;44(1):5-11
1993238
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998 Jan;35(1):77-80
9482227
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Oct;122(4):1131-1137
18827647