Planned vaginal delivery or planned caesarean delivery in women with extreme obesity.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the outcomes of planned vaginal versus planned caesarean delivery in a cohort of extremely obese women (body mass index ≥ 50 kg/m(2)).


METHODS
A national cohort study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS).


METHODS
All hospitals with consultant-led maternity units in the UK.


METHODS
Five hundred and ninety-one extremely obese women delivering in the UK between September 2007 and August 2008.


METHODS
Prospective cohort identification through UKOSS routine monthly mailings.


METHODS
Anaesthetic, postnatal and neonatal complication rates.


RESULTS
After adjustment, there were no significant differences in anaesthetic, postnatal or neonatal complications between women with planned vaginal delivery and planned caesarean delivery, with the exception of shoulder dystocia (3% versus 0%, P = 0.019). There were no significant differences in any outcomes in the subgroup of women who had no identified medical or antenatal complications.


CONCLUSIONS
This study does not provide evidence to support a routine policy of caesarean delivery for extremely obese women on the basis of concern about higher rates of delivery complications, but does support a policy of individualised decision-making on the mode of delivery based on a thorough assessment of potential risk factors for poor delivery outcomes.
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, UK.
C S E
CS
Homer
J J
JJ
Kurinczuk
P
P
Spark
P
P
Brocklehurst
M
M
Knight
D000328:Adult; D002585:Cesarean Section; D036861:Delivery, Obstetric; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D009765:Obesity / Q000628:therapy*; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D011247:Pregnancy; D011248:Pregnancy Complications / Q000628:therapy*; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D011295:Prenatal Care / Q000379:methods; D011446:Prospective Studies