Directed evolution and in silico analysis of reaction centre proteins reveal molecular signatures of photosynthesis adaptation to radiation pressure.
Evolutionary mechanisms adopted by the photosynthetic apparatus to modifications in the Earth's atmosphere on a geological time-scale remain a focus of intense research. The photosynthetic machinery has had to cope with continuously changing environmental conditions and particularly with the complex ionizing radiation emitted by solar flares. The photosynthetic D1 protein, being the site of electron tunneling-mediated charge separation and solar energy transduction, is a hot spot for the generation of radiation-induced radical injuries. We explored the possibility to produce D1 variants tolerant to ionizing radiation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and clarified the effect of radiation-induced oxidative damage on the photosynthetic proteins evolution. In vitro directed evolution strategies targeted at the D1 protein were adopted to create libraries of chlamydomonas random mutants, subsequently selected by exposures to radical-generating proton or neutron sources. The common trend observed in the D1 aminoacidic substitutions was the replacement of less polar by more polar amino acids. The applied selection pressure forced replacement of residues more sensitive to oxidative damage with less sensitive ones, suggesting that ionizing radiation may have been one of the driving forces in the evolution of the eukaryotic photosynthetic apparatus. A set of the identified aminoacidic substitutions, close to the secondary plastoquinone binding niche and oxygen evolving complex, were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis in un-transformed strains, and their sensitivity to free radicals attack analyzed. Mutants displayed reduced electron transport efficiency in physiological conditions, and increased photosynthetic performance stability and oxygen evolution capacity in stressful high-light conditions. Finally, comparative in silico analyses of D1 aminoacidic sequences of organisms differently located in the evolution chain, revealed a higher ratio of residues more sensitive to oxidative damage in the eukaryotic/cyanobacterial proteins compared to their bacterial orthologs. These results led us to hypothesize an archaean atmosphere less challenging in terms of ionizing radiation than the present one.
Institute of Crystallography, National Research Council, Monterotondo, Italy. giuseppina.rea@mlib.ic.cnr.it
Giuseppina
G
Rea
Maya
M
Lambreva
Fabio
F
Polticelli
Ivo
I
Bertalan
Amina
A
Antonacci
Sandro
S
Pastorelli
Mario
M
Damasso
Udo
U
Johanningmeier
Maria Teresa
MT
Giardi
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D003198:Computer Simulation; D019020:Directed Molecular Evolution; D004579:Electron Transport / Q000235:genetics; D005609:Free Radicals / Q000494:pharmacology; D016297:Mutagenesis, Site-Directed; D018384:Oxidative Stress; D010788:Photosynthesis / Q000528:radiation effects*; D045322:Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics* / Q000528:radiation effects; D011839:Radiation, Ionizing
D005609:Free Radicals; D045322:Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins
Plant Cell. 2005 Mar;17(3):648-63
15746074
Methods Enzymol. 2000;319:77-85
10907501
Astrobiology. 2007 Feb;7(1):252-74
17407410
Photosynth Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;94(2-3):183-202
17634752
Science. 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1286-7
19264999
Ageing Res Rev. 2010 Apr;9(2):79-90
19524071
Science. 1989 Dec 15;246(4936):1503-4
17756009
Trends Biotechnol. 2005 May;23(5):257-63
15866004
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1380-4
16593427
Physiol Plant. 2010 Feb;138(2):215-25
19947975
J Biol Chem. 2007 Jul 27;282(30):21720-8
17548357
Photosynth Res. 2001;67(1-2):5-15
16228312
Photosynth Res. 2004 Feb;79(2):219-24
16228396
Nature. 2005 Dec 15;438(7070):1040-4
16355230
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009 Mar;16(3):334-42
19219048
J Biol Chem. 2006 Aug 4;281(31):21660-21669
16735503
Photosynth Res. 2008 Oct-Dec;98(1-3):609-20
18709440
Z Med Phys. 2008;18(4):265-75
19205296
Int J Radiat Biol. 2008 Nov;84(11):867-77
19016135
J Biol Chem. 2005 May 20;280(20):19437-40
15774475
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Jul;1757(7):742-9
16784721
BMC Genomics. 2006 Jul 04;7:167
16817973
Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1831-8
14764885
Trends Biochem Sci. 2002 Feb;27(2):79-87
11852245
Biol Chem. 2008 May;389(5):609-17
18953728
J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105-32
7108955
Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2001 Sep;184(1-2):255-94
11863032
Biochem Soc Trans. 2006 Nov;34(Pt 5):619-31
17052167
Genome Biol. 2006;7(12):245
17210067
J Exp Bot. 2000 Feb;51(343):265-74
10938832
Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jun;5(6):473-83
12755714
J Biol Chem. 2005 Jul 22;280(29):27155-64
15908429
Gene. 2002 Sep 4;297(1-2):51-60
12384285
J Biol Chem. 1998 May 1;273(18):11082-91
9556593
Plant Cell Rep. 1992 Jul;11(7):323-8
24201431
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jul;4(8):e234
16802857
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Feb;75(4):897-906
19088321
Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):875-88
1981764
Biochemistry. 2004 Jun 1;43(21):6783-92
15157112
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 Feb;1777(2):130-9
17964531
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009 Jun;394(4):1081-7
19238365
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
9254694
J Mol Biol. 2007 Aug 10;371(2):396-409
17570397
Eur J Biochem. 2001 Aug;268(16):4562-9
11502218
Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Apr;22(1):91-9
8499620
Amino Acids. 2003 Dec;25(3-4):207-18
14661084