Rethinking scientific responsibility.
Researchers should be made co-responsible for the wider consequences of their research focus and the application of their findings. This paper describes a meta-reflection procedure that can be used as a tool to enhance scientific responsibility and reflective practice. The point of departure is that scientific practice is situated in power relations, has direction and, consequently, power implications. The contextual preconditions and implications of research should be stated and discussed openly. The reflection method aims at revealing both upstream elements, such as for instance preconceptions, and downstream elements, for example, public consequences of research. The validity of research might improve from such discussions. Validity should preferably be understood as a broader concept than the methodological concerns in science.
Department of Research and Development, Norrbotten County Council, 971 89 Luleå, Sweden. annika.forssen@nll.se
Annika
A
Forssén
Eivind
E
Meland
Irene
I
Hetlevik
Roger
R
Strand
D001675:Bioethics; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D012586:Science / Q000941:ethics*; D012941:Social Responsibility
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1100-2
11701576
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2000;13(1):15-25
14741790
Br Med Bull. 2001;57:33-45
11719922
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Dec 13;127(24):3228-31
18084366
BMJ. 2003 Aug 30;327(7413):498-500
12946974
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004 Sep;22(3):136-40
15370788
JAMA. 1999 Feb 3;281(5):446-53
9952205
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Feb;58(4):675-85
14672584
JAMA. 2008 Sep 3;300(9):1069-71
18768418
BMJ. 2002 Apr 13;324(7342):859-60
11950716
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jun;62(11):2720-31
16356616
Lancet. 2008 Dec 6;372(9654):1997-9
19059049
BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1061-4
16547014
BMJ. 2003 Jan 4;326(7379):22
12511457
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(3):335-46
11760233
Theor Med. 1995 Jun;16(2):183-98
7570397
BMJ. 1998 Jun 13;316(7147):1807-9
9624075
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Jun;42(11):1545-53
8771637
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 May;59(562):e173-4
19401012
Eur J Gen Pract. 2009;15(3):122-4
19883148