Strabismus-mediated primary archenteron invagination is uncoupled from Wnt/β-catenin-dependent endoderm cell fate specification in Nematostella vectensis (Anthozoa, Cnidaria): Implications for the evolution of gastrulation.
BACKGROUND
Gastrulation is a uniquely metazoan character, and its genesis was arguably the key step that enabled the remarkable diversification within this clade. The process of gastrulation involves two tightly coupled events during embryogenesis of most metazoans. Morphogenesis produces a distinct internal epithelial layer in the embryo, and this epithelium becomes segregated as an endoderm/endomesodermal germ layer through the activation of a specific gene regulatory program. The developmental mechanisms that induced archenteron formation and led to the segregation of germ layers during metazoan evolution are unknown. But an increased understanding of development in early diverging taxa at the base of the metazoan tree may provide insights into the origins of these developmental mechanisms.


RESULTS
In the anthozoan cnidarian Nematostella vectensis, initial archenteron formation begins with bottle cell-induced buckling of the blastula epithelium at the animal pole. Here, we show that bottle cell formation and initial gut invagination in Nematostella requires NvStrabismus (NvStbm), a maternally-expressed core component of the Wnt/Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) pathway. The NvStbm protein is localized to the animal pole of the zygote, remains asymmetrically expressed through the cleavage stages, and becomes restricted to the apical side of invaginating bottle cells at the blastopore. Antisense morpholino-mediated NvStbm-knockdown blocks bottle cell formation and initial archenteron invagination, but it has no effect on Wnt/ß-catenin signaling-mediated endoderm cell fate specification. Conversely, selectively blocking Wnt/ß-catenin signaling inhibits endoderm cell fate specification but does not affect bottle cell formation and initial archenteron invagination.


CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrate that Wnt/PCP-mediated initial archenteron invagination can be uncoupled from Wnt/ß-catenin-mediated endoderm cell fate specification in Nematostella, and provides evidence that these two processes could have evolved independently during metazoan evolution. We propose a two-step model for the evolution of an archenteron and the evolution of endodermal germ layer segregation. Asymmetric accumulation and activation of Wnt/PCP components at the animal pole of the last common ancestor to the eumetazoa may have induced the cell shape changes that led to the initial formation of an archenteron. Activation of Wnt/ß-catenin signaling at the animal pole may have led to the activation of a gene regulatory network that specified an endodermal cell fate in the archenteron.
Department of Biology, The University of Miami, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA. athula@miami.edu.
Shalika
S
Kumburegama
Naveen
N
Wijesena
Ronghui
R
Xu
Athula H
AH
Wikramanayake
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Dec;6(12):917-27
16341072
Development. 1999 Jan;126(2):345-57
9847248
J Cell Sci. 2000 May;113 ( Pt 10):1759-70
10769207
Zygote. 1997 May;5(2):139-51
9276511
Dev Biol. 2007 Oct 1;310(1):169-86
17716645
Development. 2008 Jun;135(12):2105-13
18480163
Curr Biol. 2009 Apr 28;19(8):706-12
19345102
Development. 2006 Nov;133(21):4131-43
17021045
Mech Dev. 1996 Jul;57(2):191-8
8843396
Dev Cell. 2004 Sep;7(3):313-25
15363407
Dev Suppl. 1992;:7-13
1299370
Curr Biol. 2005 Apr 26;15(8):787-93
15854914
Curr Biol. 2006 Oct 24;16(20):1986-97
17055977
Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 14;20(17):1499-510
20691592
Nature. 2008 Apr 10;452(7188):745-9
18322464
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1989;53(1-4):190-202
2606395
Nature. 2008 Aug 21;454(7207):955-60
18719581
Nature. 2003 Nov 27;426(6965):446-50
14647383
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 17;95(6):3020-3
9501208
Dev Cell. 2009 Aug;17(2):162-74
19686678
Dev Biol. 2010 May 1;341(1):5-19
19751720
Dev Biol. 2009 Dec 1;336(1):68-75
19782678
Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Aug;4(8):610-5
12105418
Development. 2006 Feb;133(3):547-57
16396908
Trends Genet. 2010 Apr;26(4):159-67
20227783
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2008 Aug;18(4):311-6
18721878
Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:235-51
18983257
Development. 2004 May;131(10):2463-74
15128674
Development. 2009 Apr;136(8):1327-38
19279134
Dev Biol. 2008 May 1;317(1):368-79
18387602
PLoS Biol. 2007 Apr;5(4):e70
17355179
Trends Genet. 2004 Nov;20(11):570-7
15475117
Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
12912839
Bioessays. 1997 Feb;19(2):105-16
9046240
Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:517-40
18710302
Cell. 2009 Apr 3;137(1):32-45
19345185
Biol Bull. 1996 Oct;191(2):168-177
29220235
EMBO J. 2010 Oct 20;29(20):3470-83
20823832
Cell. 2001 Apr 20;105(2):169-72
11336666
Development. 2009 Oct;136(19):3205-14
19736321
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D495-9
16381919
Bioessays. 2005 Dec;27(12):1294-302
16299758
Dev Genes Evol. 2006 Mar;216(3):119-32
16416137
Development. 2003 Jul;130(13):3007-14
12756182
Dev Cell. 2005 Mar;8(3):305-20
15737927
Dev Biol. 2007 May 15;305(2):483-97
17397821