Possible geographical barriers to trauma center access for vulnerable patients in the United States: an analysis of urban and rural communities.
OBJECTIVE
To study whether traditionally vulnerable populations have worse geographic access to trauma centers.


METHODS
A cross-sectional analysis using data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey from 2005 linked with zip code-level data from the US Census. We used a multinomial logit model to examine the odds of having difficult as opposed to easy access to trauma centers for a given subgroup of vulnerable populations.


METHODS
Population in rural and urban communities as defined by zip codes in the United States.


METHODS
Each community's distance to the nearest trauma center (levels I-III).


RESULTS
In urban areas, 67% of the population had easy access to trauma centers and 12% had difficult access compared with 24% and 31% in rural areas, respectively. Areas with higher shares of the following vulnerable population groups had higher risks (odds ratios) of facing difficult access to trauma center services in 2005: foreign born in urban areas (1.65 for a medium share and 2.18 for a high share [both P < .01]); African American in urban and rural areas (1.25 for a medium share and 1.35 for a high share, respectively [both P < .05]); and near-poor in urban and rural areas (1.52 [P < .05] and 1.69 [P < .01] for a high share, respectively).


CONCLUSIONS
A significant segment of the US population (representing 38.4 million people) does not have access to trauma care within 1 hour of driving time. Moreover, certain vulnerable groups are at higher risk than others for worse access to trauma centers. Stakeholders and health care planners should consider these factors in the development of trauma systems because a mismatch of potential need and access could signal inefficiencies in the delivery of care.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 94110, USA. renee.hsia@ucsf.edu
Renee
R
Hsia
Yu-Chu
YC
Shen
D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D019035:Rural Health Services; D014193:Trauma Centers / Q000600:supply & distribution*; D014481:United States; D019037:Urban Health Services; D035862:Vulnerable Populations
J Trauma. 1997 Mar;42(3):514-9
9095120
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jan;87(1):96-102
9065235
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jul;8(7):758-60
11435197
J Trauma. 2005 Jan;58(1):148-53
15674165
J Trauma. 1987 Nov;27(11):1200-6
3682032
J Trauma. 1994 Jun;36(6):835-44; discussion 844-6
8015006
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Oct;30(4):500-6
9326865
Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2):176-82
14734955
Inj Prev. 1997 Dec;3(4):272-6
9493623
Vital Health Stat 10. 2005 Jul;(226):1-20
16089101
J Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):199-202
12609652
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2626-33
15928284
Med Care Res Rev. 1995 Nov;52(4):532-42
10153313
J Urban Health. 1999 Sep;76(3):351-70
12607901
Arch Surg. 1992 Mar;127(3):333-8; discussion 338
1550482
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Apr;188(4):349-54
10195717
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;35(4):903-19
16709619
Health Serv Res. 2005 Jun;40(3):723-44
15960688
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):366-78
16436768
J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):565-79; discussion 579-81
10217218
JAMA. 2001 Mar 7;285(9):1164-71
11231745
J Trauma. 1996 Nov;41(5):876-85
8913220
Emerg Med Australas. 2008 Dec;20(6):494-9
19125828
Med Care. 2009 Sep;47(9):968-78
19704354
J Urban Health. 2002 Jun;79(2):200-10
12023495
Am J Surg. 2004 Jan;187(1):7-13
14706578
Popul Bull. 1985 Jun;40(3):1-44
12340180
JAMA. 2003 Mar 26;289(12):1515-22
12672768
BMJ. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1164-5
7580726
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):1047-56
16012145
J Health Econ. 2003 Mar;22(2):243-69
12606145
J Trauma. 1991 Jul;31(7):920-5; discussion 925-6
2072430
Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):945-9
18936372