Contribution of strategy use to performance on complex and simple span tasks.
Simple and complex span tasks are widely thought to measure related but separable memory constructs. Recently, however, research has demonstrated that simple and complex span tasks may tap, in part, the same construct because both similarly predict performance on measures of fluid intelligence (Gf) when the number of items retrieved from secondary memory (SM) is equated (Unsworth & Engle, Journal of Memory and Language 54:68-80 2006). Two studies (n = 105 and n = 152) evaluated whether retrieval from SM is influenced by individual differences in the use of encoding strategies during span tasks. Results demonstrated that, after equating the number of items retrieved from SM, simple and complex span performance similarly predicted Gf performance, but rates of effective strategy use did not mediate the span-Gf relationships. Moreover, at the level of individual differences, effective strategy use was more highly related to complex span performance than to simple span performance. Thus, even though individual differences in effective strategy use influenced span performance on trials that required retrieval from SM, strategic behavior at encoding cannot account for the similarities between simple and complex span tasks.
Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA. hroth@artsci.wustl.edu
Heather
H
Bailey
John
J
Dunlosky
Michael J
MJ
Kane
D000293:Adolescent; D001288:Attention; D003071:Cognition; D032882:Comprehension; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012691:Serial Learning; D013850:Thinking; D055815:Young Adult
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):200-5
20382920
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):189-217
15149250
Mem Cognit. 1996 May;24(3):305-21
8718765
Psychol Bull. 1987 Jul;102(1):28-41
3615705
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):972-92
1402719
Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):404-31
2381998
Nature. 1970 Jul 18;227(5255):288-9
5428200
Psychol Aging. 2009 Mar;24(1):82-92
19290740
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85
11515286
Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):544-76
18729591
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):769-86
16523997
J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 Sep;92(1):76-99
15963527
Child Dev. 2006 Nov-Dec;77(6):1698-716
17107455
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 May;36(3):699-710
20438267
Mem Cognit. 2010 Oct;38(7):868-82
20921100
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Dec;7(12):547-52
14643371
Psychol Bull. 2007 Nov;133(6):1038-66
17967093
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Sep;128(3):309-331
10513398
J Mem Lang. 2008 Feb;58(2):480-494
19633737
Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):66-71
15631552
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):422-33
24213976
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):931-7
19815801
Memory. 2007 Aug;15(6):634-46
17654278
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):539-76
17638496
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Sep;60(9):1227-45
17676555
Mem Cognit. 2001 Jan;29(1):10-7
11277453
Science. 1980 Jun 6;208(4448):1181-2
7375930
Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1071-7
19076475
Memory. 2001 Jul-Nov;9(4-6):333-48
11594356
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1996 Mar;125(1):4-27
8851737
Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1383-90
19015498
Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):30-60
15631550
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jan;34(1):158-71
16686115