The benefit of wire cerclage stabilisation of the medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study.
OBJECTIVE
Reduction and intramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures is often challenging. Osteosynthesis frequently fails and a higher rate of non-unions is found. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of an additional cerclage to anatomically reduce and support the medial hinge. The application is based on the experience of the surgeon; as yet no biomechanical data are available.


METHODS
Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora were used to determine the biomechanical and clinical advantage of an additional cerclage. All femora were tested in a materials testing system after osteotomy, osteosynthesis with the Gamma III nail and randomisation into two groups with or without additional cerclage.


RESULTS
After cyclic loading the compressive load to reach plastic deformation of 5 mm was 2,160 N on average in the group without cerclage vs 2,330 N on average in the group with cerclage. This biomechanical advantage showed no statistical significance (p = 0.2). Radiological examination when the abort criterion was reached revealed that use of the additional wire cerclage could significantly decrease the failure of osteosynthesis (100 vs 10%) after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures (p < 0.05).


CONCLUSIONS
In view of the more invasive operative approach with additional soft tissue injuries, application of an additional cerclage should still be considered carefully. Nevertheless, a mini-open approach to difficult fractures could be helpful in reducing the fracture with a clamp and is sometimes essential. The damage to the soft tissue must be weighed against the benefits of the procedure. An additional cerclage in oblique subtrochanteric fractures is a good option to ensure the reposition and cortical medial support if appropriate and to decrease osteosynthesis failure and rates of non-unions.
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany. thmuelle@med.uni-marburg.de
Thorben
T
Müller
Tobias
T
Topp
Christian A
CA
Kühne
Gershon
G
Gebhart
Steffen
S
Ruchholtz
Ralph
R
Zettl
D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001864:Bone Wires; D002102:Cadaver; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000601:surgery; D005594:Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D006620:Hip Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007595:Joint Prosthesis; D008297:Male; D010027:Osteotomy; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D014143:Traction / Q000379:methods*; D016474:Weight-Bearing
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Mar;73(2):330-4
2005167
Unfallchirurg. 2007 May;110(5):425-32
17361444
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 May;74(3):352-7
1587875
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Jan;124(1):31-7
13680275
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Nov;(332):71-9
8913147
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1997;83(4):335-42
9452807
Injury. 1994 Mar;25(2):99-104
8138307
Int Orthop. 2010 Oct;34(7):1041-7
19882156
Orthop Clin North Am. 2002 Jan;33(1):113-26, viii
11832316
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 May;(338):231-9
9170385
Eur J Surg. 2000 Mar;166(3):240-6
10755340
Unfallchirurg. 2005 Nov;108(11):938, 940, 941-6 passim
15977008
Injury. 2010 Jul;41(7):739-45
20394921
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 May;74(3):345-51
1587874
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):280-8
8020229
Unfallchirurg. 2000 Sep;103(9):741-8
11039294
Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Dec;69(6):580-4
9930101
J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Jun-Jul;14(5):324-8
10926238
Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2001;60(1):35-46
11759576
J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Apr;16(4):231-8
11927803
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2007 Apr;33(2):141-8
26816144
Chirurg. 1994 Nov;65(11):943-52
7821075