Systematic review of clinical trials of cervical manipulation: control group procedures and pain outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To characterize the types of control procedures used in controlled clinical trials of cervical spine manipulation and to evaluate the outcomes obtained by subjects in control groups so as to improve the quality of future clinical trials


METHODS
A search of relevant clinical trials was performed in PubMed 1966-May 2010 with the following key words: "Chiropractic"[Mesh] OR "Manipulation, Spinal"[Mesh]) AND "Clinical Trial "[Publication Type]. Reference lists from these trials were searched for any additional trials. The reference lists of two prior studies, one review and one original study were also searched. Accepted reports were then rated for quality by 2 reviewers using the PEDro scale. Studies achieving a score of >50% were included for data extraction and analysis. Intra-group change scores on pain outcomes were obtained. For determining clinically important outcomes, a threshold of 20% improvement was used where continuous data were available; otherwise, an effect size of 0.30 was employed


RESULTS
The PubMed search yielded 753 citations of which 13 were selected. Eight (8) other studies were identified by reviewing two systematic reviews and through reference searches. All studies scored >50% on the PEDro scale. There were 9 multi-session studies and 12 single-session studies. The most commonly used control procedure was "manual contact/no thrust". Four (4) studies used a placebo-control (patient blinded). For two of these studies with VAS data, the average change reported was 4.5 mm. For the other control procedures, variable results were obtained. No clinically important changes were reported in 57% of the paired comparisons, while, in 43% of these, changes which would be considered clinically important were obtained in the control groups. Only 15% of trials reported on post-intervention group registration.


CONCLUSIONS
Most control procedures in cervical manipulation trials result in small clinical changes, although larger changes are observed in 47% of paired comparisons. The vast majority of studies do not result in subject blinding; the effect of unmasking of control subjects in these studies makes the interpretation of the existing clinical trials challenging. The greatest majority of trials do not report on post-intervention blinding. A small number of candidate procedures for effective control interventions exist. Much more research is required to improve this important aspect of clinical trial methodology in cervical manipulation studies.
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College 6100 Leslie St,, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada. hvernon@cmcc.ca.
Howard
H
Vernon
Aaron
A
Puhl
Christine
C
Reinhart
BMJ. 2000 Aug 19-26;321(7259):504
10948038
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Jun;20(5):326-30
9200048
Man Ther. 2010 Oct;15(5):415-33
20538501
Spine J. 2010 Feb;10(2):117-28
19837005
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 Nov-Dec;7(6):532-5
6762670
Eura Medicophys. 2007 Mar;43(1):91-118
17369783
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Sep;29(7):511-7
16949939
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr;84(4):251-7
15785257
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1091-6; discussion 1096
12782973
J Altern Complement Med. 2002 Feb;8(1):21-32
11890430
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;37(6):325-9
17612359
Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(4):383-90
2931804
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Sep;22(7):436-43
10519559
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Apr;68(2):52-8
2649115
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;57(6):543-50
15246122
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Feb;23(2):91-5
10714533
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Jun;32(5):344-51
19539116
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2):101-6
19243721
Man Ther. 2002 May;7(2):95-102
12151246
Sleep. 1995 May;18(4):240-5
7618021
J Hum Hypertens. 2007 May;21(5):347-52
17252032
Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):334-54
20593537
Eur Spine J. 2008 Jul;17(7):889-904
18421484
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 May;55(5):430-5
12007544
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(9):675-81
19028251
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Oct;22(4):879-89
11576805
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1220-6
16291465
Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(2):135-8
16764551
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):E673-9
18758348
Man Ther. 2010 Apr;15(2):149-53
19884037
JAMA. 1998 Nov 11;280(18):1576-9
9820258
Phys Ther. 2003 Aug;83(8):713-21
12882612
Pain Res Manag. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):45-52
21369541
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Jul 18;7:58
16848905
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jun;31(5):332-7
18558274
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Oct;30(8):578-83
17996549
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Nov-Dec;28(9):662-6
16326235
Headache. 2010 Feb;50(2):224-30
19845788
Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):508-13
19027344