Scalable rules for coherent group motion in a gregarious vertebrate.
Individuals of gregarious species that initiate collective movement require mechanisms of cohesion in order to maintain advantages of group living. One fundamental question in the study of collective movement is what individual rules are employed when making movement decisions. Previous studies have revealed that group movements often depend on social interactions among individual members and specifically that collective decisions to move often follow a quorum-like response. However, these studies either did not quantify the response function at the individual scale (but rather tested hypotheses based on group-level behaviours), or they used a single group size and did not demonstrate which social stimuli influence the individual decision-making process. One challenge in the study of collective movement has been to discriminate between a common response to an external stimulus and the synchronization of behaviours resulting from social interactions. Here we discriminate between these two mechanisms by triggering the departure of one trained Merino sheep (Ovis aries) from groups containing one, three, five and seven naïve individuals. Each individual was thus exposed to various combinations of already-departed and non-departed individuals, depending on its rank of departure. To investigate which individual mechanisms are involved in maintaining group cohesion under conditions of leadership, we quantified the temporal dynamic of response at the individual scale. We found that individuals' decisions to move do not follow a quorum response but rather follow a rule based on a double mimetic effect: attraction to already-departed individuals and attraction to non-departed individuals. This rule is shown to be in agreement with an adaptive strategy that is inherently scalable as a function of group size.
Université de Toulouse, UPS, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Toulouse, France. pillot@cict.fr
Marie-Hélène
MH
Pillot
Jacques
J
Gautrais
Patrick
P
Arrufat
Iain D
ID
Couzin
Richard
R
Bon
Jean-Louis
JL
Deneubourg
D000828:Animal Population Groups / Q000523:psychology*; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D002755:Choice Behavior; D007857:Leadership; D009038:Motion; D012756:Sheep; D012919:Social Behavior
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 21;5(7):e11705
20657785
J Theor Biol. 2010 Apr 21;263(4):437-48
20060840
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):743-53
19073480
Nature. 2003 Jan 9;421(6919):155-8
12520299
Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):403-409
10675263
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Aug;20(8):449-56
16701416
Nature. 2005 Feb 3;433(7025):513-6
15690039
Biol Lett. 2007 Apr 22;3(2):137-9
17284400
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 7;276(1672):3495-503
19605395
Nature. 2003 May 22;423(6938):432-4
12761547
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6948-53
18474860
Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Jun;8(6):194-6
21236145
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1232-7
18227508
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):781-9
19073481
Behav Processes. 2010 Mar;83(3):235-41
19931601
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):719-42
19073475
J Theor Biol. 1971 May;31(2):295-311
5104951
Behav Processes. 2010 Jul;84(3):657-61
20211709