Genomic value prediction for quantitative traits under the epistatic model.
BACKGROUND
Most quantitative traits are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci (QTL). The contribution of each locus may be negligible but the collective contribution of all loci is usually significant. Genome selection that uses markers of the entire genome to predict the genomic values of individual plants or animals can be more efficient than selection on phenotypic values and pedigree information alone for genetic improvement. When a quantitative trait is contributed by epistatic effects, using all markers (main effects) and marker pairs (epistatic effects) to predict the genomic values of plants can achieve the maximum efficiency for genetic improvement.


RESULTS
In this study, we created 126 recombinant inbred lines of soybean and genotyped 80 makers across the genome. We applied the genome selection technique to predict the genomic value of somatic embryo number (a quantitative trait) for each line. Cross validation analysis showed that the squared correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted embryo numbers was 0.33 when only main (additive) effects were used for prediction. When the interaction (epistatic) effects were also included in the model, the squared correlation coefficient reached 0.78.


CONCLUSIONS
This study provided an excellent example for the application of genome selection to plant breeding.
Soybean Research Institute (Chinese Education Ministry's Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology), Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, PR China.
Zhiqiu
Z
Hu
Yongguang
Y
Li
Xiaohui
X
Song
Yingpeng
Y
Han
Xiaodong
X
Cai
Shizhong
S
Xu
Wenbin
W
Li
D001947:Breeding; D004843:Epistasis, Genetic; D005819:Genetic Markers; D018745:Genome, Plant; D008957:Models, Genetic; D040641:Quantitative Trait Loci; D012639:Seeds / Q000235:genetics*; D013025:Glycine max / Q000235:genetics*
D005819:Genetic Markers
Genet Res (Camb). 2009 Dec;91(6):427-36
20122298
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4;100(5):2574-9
12604771
Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Jun;10(6):297-304
15949764
Int J Plant Genomics. 2009;2009:141234
20037656
Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
11290733
Plant Physiol. 2008 Jul;147(3):969-77
18612074
Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Nov;89(6):698-702
24178014
Genetics. 2008 Nov;180(3):1725-42
18791236
Hereditas. 2004;141(2):149-65
15660976
Genetics. 2001 Aug;158(4):1737-53
11514459
Biometrics. 2007 Jun;63(2):513-21
17688503
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9226-31
11038567
Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Aug;91(3):471-6
24169837
Genetics. 2007 Apr;175(4):1955-63
17277367
Genetics. 2003 Feb;163(2):789-801
12618414
Plant Cell Rep. 2010 Feb;29(2):125-31
19960195