Interloop fluid in intussusception: what is its significance?
BACKGROUND
Sonography has been used to predict pneumatic reduction outcome in children with intussusception.


OBJECTIVE
To assess the prognostic significance of fluid between the intussusceptum and intussuscepiens with respect to reduction outcome, lead point or necrosis.


METHODS
Sonograms of children with a discharge diagnosis of intussusception from four institutions were reviewed for interloop fluid and correlated with results of pneumatic reduction and surgical/pathological findings when available. Maximal dimension of interloop fluid on a transverse image and fluid complexity were evaluated.


RESULTS
Of 166 cases, 36 (21.7%) had interloop fluid. Pneumatic reduction was successful in 21 (58.3%) with fluid and 113 (87.6%) without. The average largest fluid dimension was 8.7 mm (range 5 mm-19 mm, median 8 mm) in cases with successful reduction and 12.8 mm (range 4 mm-26 mm, median 12.5 mm) in unsuccessful reduction (p < 0.05). Fluid dimension equal to or greater than 9 mm correlated with failed reduction (p < 0.0001;odds ratio 13:1). In 36 cases with interloop fluid that required surgery, there were four lead points and three necrosis. In cases without fluid with surgical reduction, there was one lead point and one necrosis. Interloop fluid correlated with lead point (p < 0.04) or necrosis (p < 0.03). Its significance increased with larger amounts of fluid (p < 0.0001). Patient age/fluid complexity did not correlate with reduction outcome (p = 0.9).


CONCLUSIONS
Interloop fluid was associated with increased failure of pneumatic reduction and increased likelihood of lead point or necrosis, particularly when the maximum dimension exceeded 9 mm.
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robyn D
RD
Gartner
Terry L
TL
Levin
Steven H
SH
Borenstein
Bokyung Kim
BK
Han
Einat
E
Blumfield
Robyn
R
Murphy
Katherine
K
Freeman
D001202:Ascitic Fluid / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007443:Intussusception / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000517:prevention & control*; D008297:Male; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods*
Radiology. 1994 Jun;191(3):781-5
8184064
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 May;182(5):1169-76
15100113
Pediatr Radiol. 1999 Sep;29(9):705-10
10460334
Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21(5):350-1
1891260
Radiology. 1992 Jan;182(1):77-80
1727313
Eur Radiol. 2001;11(12):2576-80
11734961
Radiology. 1994 Jun;191(3):622-3
8184037
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Feb;178(2):445-50
11804916
Abdom Imaging. 1993;18(3):277-9
8508092
Pediatr Radiol. 2009 Jan;39(1):42-6
18982323
Radiology. 1996 Nov;201(2):379-83
8888227
Radiology. 1992 Sep;184(3):741-4
1509059