Optimality of the Münch mechanism for translocation of sugars in plants.
Plants require effective vascular systems for the transport of water and dissolved molecules between distal regions. Their survival depends on the ability to transport sugars from the leaves where they are produced to sites of active growth; a flow driven, according to the Münch hypothesis, by osmotic gradients generated by differences in sugar concentration. The length scales over which sugars are produced (Lleaf) and over which they are transported (L(stem)), as well as the radius r of the cylindrical phloem cells through which the transport takes place, vary among species over several orders of magnitude; a major unsettled question is whether the Münch transport mechanism is effective over this wide range of sizes. Optimization of translocation speed predicts a scaling relation between radius r and the characteristic lengths as r∼(Lleaf Lstem)1/3. Direct measurements using novel in vivo techniques and biomimicking microfluidic devices support this scaling relation and provide the first quantitative support for a unified mechanism of sugar translocation in plants spanning several orders of magnitude in size. The existence of a general scaling law for phloem dimensions provides a new framework for investigating the physical principles governing the morphological diversity of plants.
Centre for Fluid Dynamics, Department of Micro- and Nanotechnology, Technical University of Denmark, DTU Nanotech Building 345 East, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
K H
KH
Jensen
J
J
Lee
T
T
Bohr
H
H
Bruus
N M
NM
Holbrook
M A
MA
Zwieniecki
D001692:Biological Transport / Q000502:physiology; D050260:Carbohydrate Metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D002241:Carbohydrates; D046210:Microfluidic Analytical Techniques / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D008954:Models, Biological; D052585:Phloem / Q000378:metabolism*; D010944:Plants / Q000378:metabolism*
D002241:Carbohydrates
Nat Mater. 2003 Sep;2(9):600-3
12942070
J Theor Biol. 2003 Feb 21;220(4):419-55
12623280
Lab Chip. 2009 Jul 21;9(14):2093-9
19568680
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 May;31(5):632-45
18088335
New Phytol. 2010 Jan;185(1):189-203
19825019
J Theor Biol. 2009 Jul 21;259(2):325-37
19361530
Plant Cell. 2010 Mar;22(3):579-93
20354199
Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Sep;29(9):1715-29
16913861
Funct Plant Biol. 2009 Jul;36(7):629-644
32688676
Planta. 1972 Dec;107(4):279-300
24477479
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:207-21
19025382
Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Sep;30(8):831-841
32689068
Plant Physiol. 1974 Oct;54(4):589-600
16658935
J Exp Bot. 2002 Jun;53(373):1411-9
12021288
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:203-32
16669761
Nature. 2008 Sep 11;455(7210):208-12
18784721
Plant Physiol. 1969 Jan;44(1):45-54
16657032
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Sep;33(9):1439-52
20525003
Bull Math Biol. 1988;50(5):531-45
3233418
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 8;105(27):9140-4
18599446
Plant Physiol. 1944 Jan;19(1):131-8
16653894
Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Jan;11(1):26-32
16356759
Anal Chem. 2000 Sep 15;72(18):4317-21
11008766
Plant Physiol. 1976 Oct;58(4):556-62
16659717
Plant Physiol. 1973 Dec;52(6):531-8
16658599
Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Mar;7(3):126-32
11906836
Plant Cell. 1997 Jul;9(7):1137-1146
12237379