Determination of symbiotic nodule occupancy in the model Vicia tetrasperma using a fluorescence scanner.
BACKGROUND
Fluorescent tagging of nodule bacteria forming symbioses with legume host plants represents a tool for vital tracking of bacteria inside the symbiotic root nodules and monitoring changes in gene activity. The constitutive expression of heterologous fluorescent proteins, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP), also allows screening for nodule occupancy by a particular strain. Imaging of the fluorescence signal on a macro-scale is associated with technical problems due to the robustness of nodule tissues and a high level of autofluorescence.


METHODS
These limitations can be reduced by the use of a model species with a fine root system, such as Vicia tetrasperma. Further increases in the sensitivity and specificity of the detection and in image resolution can be attained by the use of a fluorescence scanner. Compared with the standard CCD-type cameras, the availability of a laser source of a specified excitation wavelength decreases non-specific autofluorescence while the photomultiplier tubes in emission detection significantly increase sensitivity. The large scanning area combined with a high resolution allow us to visualize individual nodules during the scan of whole root systems. Using a fluorescence scanner with excitation wavelength of 488 nm, a band-pass specific emission channel of 532 nm and a long-pass background channel of 555 nm, it was possible to distinguish nodules occupied by a rhizobial strain marked with one copy of cycle3 GFP from nodules colonized by the wild-type strain.


CONCLUSIONS
The main limitation of the current plant model and GFP with the wild-type emission peak at 409 nm is a sharp increase in root autofluorescence below 550 nm. The selectivity of the technique can be enhanced by the use of red-shifted fluorophores and the contrasting labelling of the variants, provided that the excitation (482 nm) and emission (737 nm) maxima corresponding to root chlorophyll are respected.
Department of Ecology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karel
K
Novák
D008954:Models, Biological; D053204:Root Nodules, Plant / Q000502:physiology*; D013050:Spectrometry, Fluorescence / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013559:Symbiosis / Q000502:physiology*; D031306:Vicia / Q000502:physiology*
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Nov;13(11):1243-50
11059491
Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Nov;20(11):448-55
8578587
Microb Ecol. 2001 Feb;41(4):325-332
12032606
Plant Physiol. 1992 Nov;100(3):1334-8
16653125
Plant Physiol. 2008 Dec;148(4):1985-95
18931145
New Phytol. 2007;174(1):212-223
17335510
J Exp Bot. 2004 May;55(399):983-92
15073217
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53(2):139-46
18500633
Photosynth Res. 2007 May;92(2):261-71
17525834
Plant Mol Biol. 1992 May;19(1):89-107
1600171
J Bacteriol. 1990 Nov;172(11):6557-67
2172216
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2005;50(4):323-31
16408851
Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Mar;14(3):315-9
9630892
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Oct;53(10):2539-43
16347471
Cell. 1989 Sep 8;58(5):991-9
2776216
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Nov;13(11):1163-9
11059482
J Microbiol Methods. 1999 Feb;35(1):85-92
10076635
Eur Radiol. 2003 Jan;13(1):195-208
12541130
J Bacteriol. 2002 Dec;184(24):7042-6
12446653
Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1231-1236
12232161
New Phytol. 2004 Sep;163(3):661-668
33873748
Plant Mol Biol. 1995 Sep;28(6):1103-10
7548827
J Bacteriol. 1996 Dec;178(24):7159-66
8955397
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007 Sep;20(9):1040-7
17849706
Genes Dev. 1990 Mar;4(3):344-56
2159937
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1986;40:131-57
3535643
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54:257-88
11018130