Plant diversity surpasses plant functional groups and plant productivity as driver of soil biota in the long term.
BACKGROUND
One of the most significant consequences of contemporary global change is the rapid decline of biodiversity in many ecosystems. Knowledge of the consequences of biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems is largely restricted to single ecosystem functions. Impacts of key plant functional groups on soil biota are considered to be more important than those of plant diversity; however, current knowledge mainly relies on short-term experiments.


RESULTS
We studied changes in the impacts of plant diversity and presence of key functional groups on soil biota by investigating the performance of soil microorganisms and soil fauna two, four and six years after the establishment of model grasslands. The results indicate that temporal changes of plant community effects depend on the trophic affiliation of soil animals: plant diversity effects on decomposers only occurred after six years, changed little in herbivores, but occurred in predators after two years. The results suggest that plant diversity, in terms of species and functional group richness, is the most important plant community property affecting soil biota, exceeding the relevance of plant above- and belowground productivity and the presence of key plant functional groups, i.e. grasses and legumes, with the relevance of the latter decreasing in time.


CONCLUSIONS
Plant diversity effects on biota are not only due to the presence of key plant functional groups or plant productivity highlighting the importance of diverse and high-quality plant derived resources, and supporting the validity of the singular hypothesis for soil biota. Our results demonstrate that in the long term plant diversity essentially drives the performance of soil biota questioning the paradigm that belowground communities are not affected by plant diversity and reinforcing the importance of biodiversity for ecosystem functioning.
Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America. nico.eisenhauer@web.de
Nico
N
Eisenhauer
Alexandru
A
Milcu
Alexander C W
AC
Sabais
Holger
H
Bessler
Johanna
J
Brenner
Christof
C
Engels
Bernhard
B
Klarner
Mark
M
Maraun
Stephan
S
Partsch
Christiane
C
Roscher
Felix
F
Schonert
Vicky M
VM
Temperton
Karolin
K
Thomisch
Alexandra
A
Weigelt
Wolfgang W
WW
Weisser
Stefan
S
Scheu
D044822:Biodiversity; D017753:Ecosystem; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D007887:Fabaceae; D010944:Plants; D006109:Poaceae; D012987:Soil; D012988:Soil Microbiology
D012987:Soil
Ecol Lett. 2007 Aug;10(8):729-36
17594428
Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Jan;9(1):26-32
14729216
Ecology. 2009 Jan;90(1):90-9
19294916
Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):208-11
10821280
Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):804-8
11679658
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):870-86
16796577
Nature. 2008 Feb 7;451(7179):712-5
18256670
Ecology. 2008 Jan;89(1):226-36
18376564
Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):1872-82
18705374
Am Nat. 2001 Jul;158(1):17-35
18707312
Oecologia. 1998 Sep;116(3):390-396
28308071
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 13;104(46):18123-8
17991772
Nature. 2000 Feb 17;403(6771):762-4
10693803
Ecol Lett. 2006 Oct;9(10):1146-56
16972878
Oecologia. 2007 Mar;151(2):190-205
17048010
Science. 2000 Mar 10;287(5459):1770-4
10710299
Science. 2004 Jun 11;304(5677):1629-33
15192218
Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3290-302
20120799
Nature. 2007 Jul 12;448(7150):188-90
17625564
Ecol Lett. 1999 Sep;2(5):286-293
33810630
Ecology. 2010 Feb;91(2):485-96
20392013
Nature. 2003 Apr 17;422(6933):711-3
12700759
Ecology. 2009 Jun;90(6):1520-30
19569367
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 6;101(27):10101-6
15220472
Oecologia. 1997 May;110(4):449-460
28307235
Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:421-47
9444753
Nature. 2010 Nov 25;468(7323):553-6
20981010
Ecol Lett. 2008 Mar;11(3):296-310
18047587
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Nov;20(11):634-41
16701447
Oecologia. 2000 Oct;125(2):271-282
24595838
Science. 2003 Dec 5;302(5651):1719-23
14657489
Nature. 2001 Apr 12;410(6830):809-12
11298447
Oecologia. 2002 Nov;133(3):412-421
28466208