Repulsive forces between looping chromosomes induce entropy-driven segregation.
One striking feature of chromatin organization is that chromosomes are compartmentalized into distinct territories during interphase, the degree of intermingling being much smaller than expected for linear chains. A growing body of evidence indicates that the formation of loops plays a dominant role in transcriptional regulation as well as the entropic organization of interphase chromosomes. Using a recently proposed model, we quantitatively determine the entropic forces between chromosomes. This Dynamic Loop Model assumes that loops form solely on the basis of diffusional motion without invoking other long-range interactions. We find that introducing loops into the structure of chromatin results in a multi-fold higher repulsion between chromosomes compared to linear chains. Strong effects are observed for the tendency of a non-random alignment; the overlap volume between chromosomes decays fast with increasing loop number. Our results suggest that the formation of chromatin loops imposes both compartmentalization as well as order on the system without requiring additional energy-consuming processes.
Institute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. bohn@tphys.uni-heidelberg.de
Manfred
M
Bohn
Dieter W
DW
Heermann
D002451:Cell Compartmentation; D002843:Chromatin / Q000737:chemistry*; D002875:Chromosomes / Q000737:chemistry*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D019277:Entropy; D007399:Interphase; D008958:Models, Molecular; D013816:Thermodynamics; D014158:Transcription, Genetic
D002843:Chromatin
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Aug 22;4(8):e1000153
18725929
Science. 2009 Oct 9;326(5950):289-93
19815776
Cell. 2009 Jun 26;137(7):1194-211
19563753
Nat Genet. 2006 Nov;38(11):1348-54
17033623
Biophys J. 2001 Apr;80(4):1940-56
11259307
Genes Dev. 2003 Oct 1;17(19):2406-20
14522946
J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 22;285(3):1053-65
9887267
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007 Oct;17(5):408-14
17913490
Mol Cell. 2002 Dec;10(6):1453-65
12504019
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 28;92(7):2710-4
7708711
Biophys J. 1994 Mar;66(3 Pt 1):827-37
8011915
Trends Genet. 2007 Mar;23(3):126-33
17280735
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 25;5(8):e12218
20811620
Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2006 Mar;19(3):241-9
16547610
Biophys J. 2009 Oct 21;97(8):2146-53
19843447
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Nov;76(5 Pt 1):051805
18233679
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 10;106(10):3812-7
19234129
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr;2(4):292-301
11283701
J Cell Biol. 2009 Sep 21;186(6):825-34
19752020
Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Jun;27(12):4475-87
17420274
J Chem Phys. 2010 Jan 28;132(4):044904
20113063
PLoS Biol. 2006 May;4(5):e138
16623600
Science. 2002 Feb 15;295(5558):1306-11
11847345