Performance-based contracting within a state substance abuse treatment system: a preliminary exploration of differences in client access and client outcomes.
To explore whether the implementation of performance-based contracting (PBC) within the State of Maine's substance abuse treatment system resulted in improved performance, one descriptive and two empirical analyses were conducted. The first analysis examined utilization and payment structure. The second study was designed to examine whether timeliness of access to outpatient (OP) and intensive outpatient (IOP) substance abuse assessments and treatment, measures that only became available after the implementation of PBC, differed between PBC and non-PBC agencies in the year following implementation of PBC. Using treatment admission records from the state treatment data system (N = 9,128), logistic regression models run using generalized equation estimation techniques found no significant difference between PBC agencies and other agencies on timeliness of access to assessments or treatment, for both OP and IOP services. The third analysis, conducted using discharge data from the years prior to and after the implementation of performance-based contracting (N = 6,740) for those agencies that became a part of the performance-based contracting system, was designed to assess differences in level of participation, retention, and completion of treatment. Regression models suggest that performance on OP client engagement and retention measures was significantly poorer the year after the implementation of PBC, but that temporal rather than a PBC effects were more significant. No differences were found between years for IOP level of participation or completion of treatment measures.
State of Maine, Office of Substance Abuse, 41 Anthony Ave, Augusta, ME 04333, USA. debra.brucker@gmail.com
Debra L
DL
Brucker
Maureen
M
Stewart
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003284:Contract Services / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008281:Maine; D008297:Male; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D013221:State Health Plans / Q000458:organization & administration; D016320:Substance Abuse Treatment Centers / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000534:rehabilitation / Q000628:therapy; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1995 Nov;21(4):533-47
8561101
Am J Public Health. 1994 Feb;84(2):215-21
8296943
Health Serv Res. 1997 Dec;32(5):631-50
9402905
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1990;16(1-2):67-76
2330937
Int J Addict. 1980 Jul;15(5):711-36
7419304
Addict Behav. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):131-7
11800219
Addict Dis. 1978;3(3):437-47
707196
Psychol Rep. 1985 Dec;57(3 Pt 1):991-4
4080923
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Dec;5(4):141-52
14578548
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 May 11;88(2-3):138-45
17129680
Health Serv Res. 2003 Apr;38(2):535-52
12785560
Inquiry. 2006 Spring;43(1):34-53
16838817
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Jun;22(4):197-209
12072164