Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised trial.
BACKGROUND
Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with decreased intrathoracic pressure in the decompression phase can lead to improved haemodynamics compared with standard CPR. We aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of this intervention on survival with favourable neurological function after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.


METHODS
In our randomised trial of 46 emergency medical service agencies (serving 2·3 million people) in urban, suburban, and rural areas of the USA, we assessed outcomes for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to Utstein guidelines. We provisionally enrolled patients to receive standard CPR or active compression-decompression CPR with augmented negative intrathoracic pressure (via an impedance-threshold device) with a computer-generated block randomisation weekly schedule in a one-to-one ratio. Adults (presumed age or age ≥18 years) who had a non-traumatic arrest of presumed cardiac cause and met initial and final selection criteria received designated CPR and were included in the final analyses. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge with favourable neurological function (modified Rankin scale score of ≤3). All investigators apart from initial rescuers were masked to treatment group assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00189423.


RESULTS
2470 provisionally enrolled patients were randomly allocated to treatment groups. 813 (68%) of 1201 patients assigned to the standard CPR group (controls) and 840 (66%) of 1269 assigned to intervention CPR received designated CPR and were included in the final analyses. 47 (6%) of 813 controls survived to hospital discharge with favourable neurological function compared with 75 (9%) of 840 patients in the intervention group (odds ratio 1·58, 95% CI 1·07-2·36; p=0·019]. 74 (9%) of 840 patients survived to 1 year in the intervention group compared with 48 (6%) of 813 controls (p=0·03), with equivalent cognitive skills, disability ratings, and emotional-psychological statuses in both groups. The overall major adverse event rate did not differ between groups, but more patients had pulmonary oedema in the intervention group (94 [11%] of 840) than did controls (62 [7%] of 813; p=0·015).


CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of our findings showing increased effectiveness and generalisability of the study intervention, active compression-decompression CPR with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure should be considered as an alternative to standard CPR to increase long-term survival after cardiac arrest.


BACKGROUND
US National Institutes of Health grant R44-HL065851-03, Advanced Circulatory Systems.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. taufderh@mcw.edu
Tom P
TP
Aufderheide
Ralph J
RJ
Frascone
Marvin A
MA
Wayne
Brian D
BD
Mahoney
Robert A
RA
Swor
Robert M
RM
Domeier
Michael L
ML
Olinger
Richard G
RG
Holcomb
David E
DE
Tupper
Demetris
D
Yannopoulos
Keith G
KG
Lurie
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D002560:Cerebrovascular Circulation; D003326:Coronary Circulation; D004632:Emergency Medical Services; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009460:Neurologic Examination; D058687:Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest / Q000401:mortality* / Q000628:therapy*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011654:Pulmonary Edema / Q000453:epidemiology; D017180:Tachycardia, Ventricular / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology; D014693:Ventricular Fibrillation / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy
Resuscitation. 1996 Oct;32(3):203-6
8923582
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;14(10):882-8
10521888
Resuscitation. 2003 Nov;59(2):255-60
14625117
Resuscitation. 2005 Mar;64(3):353-62
15733766
Resuscitation. 1996 Oct;32(3):206-12
8923583
Crit Care Med. 2005 May;33(5):990-4
15891326
Resuscitation. 2005 Mar;64(3):363-72
15733767
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1988;18(4):365-74
3235282
Circulation. 2005 Dec 13;112(24 Suppl):IV1-203
16314375
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006 Jun;12(3):198-203
16672776
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 21;47(4):835-41
16487853
Resuscitation. 2002 Jan;52(1):39-48
11801347
Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov;36(11 Suppl):S397-404
20449900
Resuscitation. 2004 Jun;61(3):265-71
15172704
Circulation. 2008 Jul 22;118(4):389-96
18606920
Neuroepidemiology. 2001 Feb;20(1):26-30
11174042
Resuscitation. 2000 May;44(3):219-30
10825624
JAMA. 2005 Jan 19;293(3):299-304
15657322
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 Mar;63(3):118-23
7073452
Circulation. 2003 Nov 4;108(18):2201-5
14568898
Circulation. 1994 Feb;89(2):684-93
8313556
Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Aug;20(8):861-74
1854070
Circulation. 1995 Mar 15;91(6):1629-32
7882467
Crit Care Med. 2008 May;36(5):1625-32
18434910
Pediatr Res. 2002 Apr;51(4):523-7
11919340
JAMA. 2008 Sep 24;300(12):1423-31
18812533
Crit Care Med. 2006 Dec;34(12 Suppl):S495-500
17114984
Circulation. 2000 Mar 7;101(9):989-94
10704165
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 May;8(5):584-600
9160235
Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1496-502, table of contents
12456407