Evaluating the relationship among cavitation, zygapophyseal joint gapping, and spinal manipulation: an exploratory case series.
OBJECTIVE
This project determined the feasibility of conducting larger studies assessing the relationship between cavitation and zygapophyseal (Z) joint gapping following spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).


METHODS
Five healthy volunteers (average age, 25.4 years) were screened and examined against inclusion and exclusion criteria. High-signal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers were fixed to T12, L3, and S1 spinous processes. Scout images were taken to verify the location of the markers. Axial images of the L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels were obtained in the neutral supine position. Following the first MRI, accelerometers were placed over the same spinous processes; and recordings were made from them during side-posture positioning and SMT. The accelerometers were removed, and each subject was scanned in side-posture. The greatest central anterior to posterior Z joint spaces (gap) were measured from the first and second MRI scans. Values obtained from the first scan were subtracted from those of the second, with a positive result indicating an increase in gapping following SMT (positive gapping difference). Gapping difference was compared between the up-side (SMT) joints vs the down-side (non-SMT) joints and between up-side cavitation vs up-side noncavitation joints.


RESULTS
Greater gapping was found in Z joints that received SMT (0.5 ± 0.6 mm) vs non-SMT joints (-0.2 ± 0.6 mm), and vertebral segments that cavitated gapped more than those that did not cavitate (0.8 ± 0.7 vs 0.4 ± 0.5 mm).


CONCLUSIONS
A future clinical study is quite feasible. Forty subjects (30 in an SMT group and 10 in a control group) would be needed for appropriate power (0.90).
National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, IL 60510, USA. gcramer@nuhs.edu
Gregory D
GD
Cramer
Kim
K
Ross
Judith
J
Pocius
Joe A
JA
Cantu
Evelyn
E
Laptook
Michael
M
Fergus
Doug
D
Gregerson
Scott
S
Selby
P K
PK
Raju
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D020393:Manipulation, Spinal / Q000379:methods; D021801:Zygapophyseal Joint
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(9):695-706
17142164
J Neurosci Methods. 1998 Dec 1;85(2):211-8
9874157
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jul 1;29(13):1452-7
15223938
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Oct;23(8):536-44
11050610
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):5-13
16396724
Neurol Clin. 1999 Feb;17(1):91-111
9855673
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Oct 1;117(7):590-8
1388006
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Feb;27(2):e2
14970817
Auton Neurosci. 2001 Aug 13;91(1-2):96-9
11515806
Man Ther. 1996 Sep;1(4):198-203
11440508
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):14-21
16396725
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(9):726-61
17142166
Man Ther. 2001 May;6(2):72-81
11414776
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Jul-Aug;23(6):380-94
10951308
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Feb;15(2):83-9
1373431
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):40-5
16396728
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;84(7):1057-60
12881834
J Neurosci Methods. 1999 Jul 15;89(2):87-96
10491938
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Mar-Apr;18(3):155-64
7790795
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 May;25(4):251-62
12021744
Spine J. 2004 Mar-Apr;4(2):141-52
15016391
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Sep;26(7):426-36
12975629
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jun 15;18(8):1096-102
8367779
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1993 Jul;8(4):210-4
23915971
Chiropr Osteopat. 2008 May 28;16:5
18507834
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Mar-Apr;(115):149-56
130216
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Feb;18(2):65-71
7790785
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Sep;23(7):458-64
11004649
Spine J. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):277-90
15863084
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2459-66
12435975