Atomistic simulations reveal bubbles, kinks and wrinkles in supercoiled DNA.
Although DNA is frequently bent and supercoiled in the cell, much of the available information on DNA structure at the atomistic level is restricted to short linear sequences. We report atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a series of DNA minicircles containing between 65 and 110 bp which we compare with a recent biochemical study of structural distortions in these tight DNA loops. We have observed a wealth of non-canonical DNA structures such as kinks, denaturation bubbles and wrinkled conformations that form in response to bending and torsional stress. The simulations show that bending alone is sufficient to induce the formation of kinks in circles containing only 65 bp, but we did not observe any defects in simulations of larger torsionally relaxed circles containing 110 bp over the same MD timescales. We also observed that under-winding in minicircles ranging in size from 65 to 110 bp leads to the formation of single stranded bubbles and wrinkles. These calculations are used to assess the ability of atomistic MD simulations to determine the structure of bent and supercoiled DNA.
Polymer IRC, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds West Yorkshire, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
J S
JS
Mitchell
C A
CA
Laughton
Sarah A
SA
Harris
D004278:DNA, Superhelical / Q000737:chemistry*; D008958:Models, Molecular; D056004:Molecular Dynamics Simulation; D009690:Nucleic Acid Conformation; D009691:Nucleic Acid Denaturation
D004278:DNA, Superhelical
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Jun 13;100(23):238103
18643548
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Sep;37(16):5568-77
19586933
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Jan 11;100(1):018102
18232822
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Feb;71(2 Pt 1):021909
15783354
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Apr;36(7):2379-94
18299282
J Am Chem Soc. 2001 Dec 19;123(50):12658-63
11741431
Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Mar 1;26(5):1254-60
9469834
Science. 1996 Mar 29;271(5257):1835-7
8596951
J Biol Chem. 1984 Feb 10;259(3):1963-7
6319416
Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Sep 3;93(10):108108
15447460
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Apr;68(4):815-9
5279522
Nat Nanotechnol. 2006 Nov;1(2):137-41
18654166
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(1):21-9
17984075
EMBO Rep. 2007 Feb;8(2):147-51
17268506
Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:199-223
1497310
J Mol Biol. 1997 Jun 27;269(5):827-41
9223644
J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):33-8, 27-8
8744570
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Mar;36(4):1120-8
18096619
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Sep 1;31(17):5108-21
12930962
Structure. 2006 Oct;14(10):1527-34
17027501
Biophys J. 2007 Jun 1;92(11):3817-29
17351000
J Phys Chem B. 2008 Jul 31;112(30):9020-41
18593145
Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69
20334529
Mol Cell. 2004 May 7;14(3):355-62
15125838
J Mol Biol. 2001 Nov 16;314(1):63-74
11724532
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jul;38(12):4163-72
20215439
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 May;74(5):1775-9
266701
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1999 Feb;16(4):845-62
10217454
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47 Pt 1:53-65
6574857
Biophys J. 2009 Feb 18;96(4):1341-9
19217852
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 18;107(20):9088-92
20439751
Nat Struct Biol. 2001 May;8(5):432-6
11323719
Nature. 1992 Jan 2;355(6355):89-91
1731202
J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 17;275(11):8103-13
10713132
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jun;37(11):3766-73
19380377
Nature. 2003 May 8;423(6936):145-50
12736678
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 12;102(15):5397-402
15809441
J Chem Theory Comput. 2006 May;2(3):685-95
26626674
J Biol Chem. 1977 Dec 10;252(23):8740-6
925019
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 Aug 19;59(4):1380-8
4606346
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Jan;26(5):457-91
12586391
EMBO J. 1994 Jul 15;13(14):3348-55
8045263
Cell. 1988 May 6;53(3):433-40
2835168
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 15;95(19):11163-8
9736707
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D267-74
19906722
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 19;5(2):e9326
20174470
Nano Lett. 2005 Jul;5(7):1509-14
16178266
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 May;37(9):2882-93
19282451
Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jun 11;11(11):3811-22
6304643