Mapping the moral domain.
The moral domain is broader than the empathy and justice concerns assessed by existing measures of moral competence, and it is not just a subset of the values assessed by value inventories. To fill the need for reliable and theoretically grounded measurement of the full range of moral concerns, we developed the Moral Foundations Questionnaire on the basis of a theoretical model of 5 universally available (but variably developed) sets of moral intuitions: Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity, Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity. We present evidence for the internal and external validity of the scale and the model, and in doing so we present new findings about morality: (a) Comparative model fitting of confirmatory factor analyses provides empirical justification for a 5-factor structure of moral concerns; (b) convergent/discriminant validity evidence suggests that moral concerns predict personality features and social group attitudes not previously considered morally relevant; and (c) we establish pragmatic validity of the measure in providing new knowledge and research opportunities concerning demographic and cultural differences in moral intuitions. These analyses provide evidence for the usefulness of Moral Foundations Theory in simultaneously increasing the scope and sharpening the resolution of psychological views of morality.
University of Southern California, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. jesse.graham@usc.edu
Jesse
J
Graham
Brian A
BA
Nosek
Jonathan
J
Haidt
Ravi
R
Iyer
Spassena
S
Koleva
Peter H
PH
Ditto
D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019545:Intuition; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D009014:Morals; D010865:Pilot Projects; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012945:Social Values; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8
11557895
Am Psychol. 2006 Oct;61(7):651-70
17032067
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Dec;83(6):1423-40
12500822
Psychol Rev. 1992 Oct;99(4):689-723
1454904
Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):364-71
19375075
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Oct;65(4):613-28
8229648
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 May;78(5):853-70
10821194
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15623-8
17030808
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;1(4):365-76
26151800
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):65-72
26158671
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Jan;68(1):151-8
7861311
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1991;56(2):1-103
1766444
Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40
11805825
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):1029-46
19379034
Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):814-34
11699120