Observers exploit stochastic models of sensory change to help judge the passage of time.
Sensory stimulation can systematically bias the perceived passage of time, but why and how this happens is mysterious. In this report, we provide evidence that such biases may ultimately derive from an innate and adaptive use of stochastically evolving dynamic stimuli to help refine estimates derived from internal timekeeping mechanisms. A simplified statistical model based on probabilistic expectations of stimulus change derived from the second-order temporal statistics of the natural environment makes three predictions. First, random noise-like stimuli whose statistics violate natural expectations should induce timing bias. Second, a previously unexplored obverse of this effect is that similar noise stimuli with natural statistics should reduce the variability of timing estimates. Finally, this reduction in variability should scale with the interval being timed, so as to preserve the overall Weber law of interval timing. All three predictions are borne out experimentally. Thus, in the context of our novel theoretical framework, these results suggest that observers routinely rely on sensory input to augment their sense of the passage of time, through a process of Bayesian inference based on expectations of change in the natural environment.
Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Misha B
MB
Ahrens
Maneesh
M
Sahani
D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013269:Stochastic Processes; D013998:Time Perception
Neuron. 2007 Feb 1;53(3):427-38
17270738
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 12;364(1525):1841-51
19487187
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1996 Feb;49(1):24-44
8901385
Curr Biol. 2006 Mar 7;16(5):472-9
16527741
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Apr;13(4):422-33
12631571
J Neurosci. 2003 Jun 15;23(12):5342-53
12832560
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Aug;13(8):1020-6
20581842
Science. 1995 Feb 17;267(5200):1028-30
7863330
Biosystems. 1998 Sep-Dec;48(1-3):11-9
9886627
J Vis. 2007 Jul 06;7(10):2.1-5
17997671
J Neurosci. 2004 Mar 31;24(13):3210-22
15056700
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Mar;71(2):215-51
10220931
PLoS One. 2007 Nov 28;2(11):e1264
18043760
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jan;57(1):105-16
7885802
J Vis. 2006 Dec 15;6(12):1421-30
17209745
J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 9;25(45):10369-71
16280574
Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):274-95
3375401
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1989 Jan;36(1):150-60
2921061
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):755-65
16163383