Match probabilities in a finite, subdivided population.
We generalize a recently introduced graphical framework to compute the probability that haplotypes or genotypes of two individuals drawn from a finite, subdivided population match. As in the previous work, we assume an infinite-alleles model. We focus on the case of a population divided into two subpopulations, but the underlying framework can be applied to a general model of population subdivision. We examine the effect of population subdivision on the match probabilities and the accuracy of the product rule which approximates multi-locus match probabilities as a product of one-locus match probabilities. We quantify the deviation from predictions of the product rule by R, the ratio of the multi-locus match probability to the product of the one-locus match probabilities. We carry out the computation for two loci and find that ignoring subdivision can lead to underestimation of the match probabilities if the population under consideration actually has subdivision structure and the individuals originate from the same subpopulation. On the other hand, under a given model of population subdivision, we find that the ratio R for two loci is only slightly greater than 1 for a large range of symmetric and asymmetric migration rates. Keeping in mind that the infinite-alleles model is not the appropriate mutation model for STR loci, we conclude that, for two loci and biologically reasonable parameter values, population subdivision may lead to results that disfavor innocent suspects because of an increase in identity-by-descent in finite populations. On the other hand, for the same range of parameters, population subdivision does not lead to a substantial increase in linkage disequilibrium between loci. Those results are consistent with established practice.
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Anna-Sapfo
AS
Malaspinas
Montgomery
M
Slatkin
Yun S
YS
Song
D000483:Alleles; D005838:Genotype; D006239:Haplotypes; D008957:Models, Genetic; D011336:Probability
Forensic Sci Int. 1994 Feb;64(2-3):125-40
8175083
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 15;25(12):i187-95
19477986
Theor Popul Biol. 2007 Aug;72(1):96-110
17239909
Theor Popul Biol. 2003 May;63(3):207-19
12689792
J Math Biol. 1980 Apr;9(2):101-14
7365330
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3166-70
8159720
J Forensic Sci. 2004 Sep;49(5):1009-14
15461102
Trends Genet. 2000 Dec;16(12):551-8
11102705
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 17;95(4):1961-7
9465125
J Forensic Sci. 2001 May;46(3):453-89
11372982
Genetica. 1995;96(1-2):3-12
7607457
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Apr;60(4):772-89
9106523
J Forensic Sci. 2009 Jan;54(1):22-7
19040670