Is robotic surgery superior to endoscopic and open surgeries in thyroid cancer?
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic thyroidectomies have been performed using various approaches, and indications have expanded with the development of new surgical techniques and instruments. Endoscopic thyroid surgery using bilateral axillo-breast approaches have excellent cosmetic results and a symmetrical, optimal operative view. However, because of the two-dimensional view and the nonflexible instruments, these approaches are not easy to use in performing a central lymph node dissection (CND). Robotic surgery has drawn attention as a potentially safe and effective method for treating thyroid cancer. The aim of the present study was to determine whether robotic surgery is superior to endoscopic and open surgery through comparing technical aspects and surgical outcomes.


METHODS
From October 2008 to December 2009, 302 patients had total thyroidectomies and CND with cancer less than 1 cm. Patients were divided into three groups according to operation methods (open group; n = 138), (endo group; n = 95), (robot group; n = 69).


RESULTS
Young patients preferred the robotic and endoscopic surgery. The number of retrieved lymph nodes in the open group (4.8 ± 2.8) was not different from the robot group (4.7 ± 2.7) and the endo group (4.6 ± 3.7). The operative time of the robot group was longer than the open and the endo group. The total drain amount in the robot group was more than the open and endo groups; however, there was no difference in the length of hospitalization and complication rates. There were no differences between the open (0.8 ± 2.0) and robot groups (0.8 ± 1.4), but the endo group (2.4 ± 6.3) showed higher postoperative serum thyroglobulin off thyroid hormone (Off-Tg) when compared to the open and robot groups.


CONCLUSIONS
Robotic surgery was equal to open surgery except with respect to operative time and was superior to endoscopic surgery in Off-Tg levels presenting completeness of the operation in thyroid cancer surgery. Because it has excellent cosmetic results and various technical advantages, it should be considered in young, low-risk patients with thyroid carcinoma less than 1 cm.
Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Wan Wook
WW
Kim
Jee Soo
JS
Kim
Sung Mo
SM
Hur
Sung Hoon
SH
Kim
Se-Kyung
SK
Lee
Jae Hyuck
JH
Choi
Sangmin
S
Kim
Jeong Eon
JE
Lee
Jung-Han
JH
Kim
Seok Jin
SJ
Nam
Jung-Hyun
JH
Yang
Jun-Ho
JH
Choe
D000328:Adult; D002277:Carcinoma; D002291:Carcinoma, Papillary; D015331:Cohort Studies; D004724:Endoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007723:Korea; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000503:physiopathology; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012371:Robotics / Q000379:methods*; D000077273:Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; D013964:Thyroid Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013965:Thyroidectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1741-5
12140635
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006 Aug;16(4):226-31
16921301
World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2302-6; discussion 2307-8
17566819
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000 Oct;41(5):791-2
11149652
Surgery. 2001 Dec;130(6):1039-43
11742335
Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):88-91
11961612
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;100(6):477-80
19653245
Surg Endosc. 1997 Aug;11(8):877
9266657
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Sep;191(3):336-40
10989910
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003 Jun;13(3):196-201
12819505
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Oct;135(4):633-5
17011430
Surg Endosc. 2001 Nov;15(11):1362-4
11727158
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000 Feb;10(1):1-4
10872517
World J Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):601-6
17308853
Thyroid. 2009 Nov;19(11):1167-214
19860577
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Jun;19(3):e71-5
19542833
Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov;23(11):2399-406
19263137
Surgery. 2002 Dec;132(6):1070-3; discussion 1073-4
12490857
Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):486-91
16552199