Are ECG premature complexes induced by ultrasonic cavitation electrophysiological responses to irreversible cardiomyocyte injury?
The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between premature complexes (PCs) in the electrocardiogram (ECG) and lethal injury of cardiomyocytes induced by ultrasound exposure of the heart with contrast-agent gas bodies in the circulation. Anesthetized rats were exposed in a heated water bath to 1.55 MHz focused ultrasound with bursts triggered at end systole during contrast agent infusion. PCs were detected in ECG recordings and cardiomyocyte necrosis was scored by identifying Evans blue-stained cells in multiple frozen sections. With 0.1 μL/kg/min infusion of contrast agent for 5 min, both effects increased strongly for 2-ms bursts with increasing peak rarefactional pressure amplitude >1 MPa. At 8 MPa, statistically significant effects were found even for no agent infusion relative to sham tests. For 2-ms bursts at 2 MPa, the highly significant bioeffects seen for 10-, 1- and 0.1-μL/kg/min infusion became marginally significant for 0.01 μL/kg/min, which indicated a lower probability of cavitation nucleation. Burst duration variation from 0.2-20 ms produced no substantial trends in the results. Overall, the two effects were well correlated (r(2) = 0.88). The PCs occurring during contrast-enhanced ultrasound therefore appear to be electrophysiological responses to irreversible cardiomyocyte injury induced by ultrasonic cavitation.
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5667, USA. douglm@umich.edu
Douglas L
DL
Miller
Chunyan
C
Dou
Benedict R
BR
Lucchesi
D000818:Animals; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000009:adverse effects; D004562:Electrocardiography; D055724:Electrophysiological Phenomena; D008863:Microspheres; D032383:Myocytes, Cardiac / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D009336:Necrosis; D051381:Rats; D014465:Ultrasonics; D014463:Ultrasonography
D003287:Contrast Media
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001 Jun;14(6):618-25
11391291
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 4;47(7):1464-8
16580537
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Nov;120(5 Pt 1):2958-64
17139752
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2002-8
17902837
J Cardiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):69-74
15017786
J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Aug;24(8):1099-107
16040825
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Apr;13(4):288-94
10756246
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994;20(3):279-85
8059489
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004 Jan;30(1):83-91
14962612
J Nucl Med. 1985 Jan;26(1):72-6
3965655
Cardiovasc Res. 2004 Feb 15;61(3):386-401
14962471
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2008 Nov-Dec;17(6):349-74
18402842
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Jun;52(6):971-9
16118978
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 May;119(5 Pt 1):3147-52
16708969
J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Apr;27(4):611-32; quiz 633-6
18359911
Echocardiography. 2005 Jan;22(1):25-34
15660683
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Jan;57(1):167-74
19709948
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jun;35(6):1050-6
19195768
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1991;17(2):157-69
2053212
J Ultrasound Med. 2009 Nov;28(11):1519-26
19854967
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Apr;35(4):672-9
19110365
Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):137-43
16183929
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 Jun;33(6):959-69
17445967
Anat Rec. 1986 Aug;215(4):420-6
3740478
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008 May;55(5):1122-32
18519220
Circulation. 1992 Sep;86(3):968-78
1381296
Scan Electron Microsc. 1986;(Pt 4):1469-75
3810021
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23(2):275-85
9140184
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1999;71(1):139-54
10070214
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003 Sep;29(9):1341-9
14553812