Patient navigation from the paired perspectives of cancer patients and navigators: a qualitative analysis.
OBJECTIVE
Patient navigation for cancer care assesses and alleviates barriers to health care services. We examined paired perspectives of cancer patients and their navigators to examine the process of patient navigation. We explored the strengths, limitations, and our own lessons learned about adopting the novel methodology of multiperspective analysis.


METHODS
As part of a larger RCT, patients and navigators were interviewed separately. We reviewed interviews with 18 patient-navigator dyads. Dyad summaries were created that explicitly incorporated both patient and navigator perspectives. Emerging themes and verbatim quotations were reflected in the summaries.


RESULTS
Paired perspectives were valuable in identifying struggles that arose during navigation. These were represented as imbalanced investment and relational amelioration. Patients and navigators had general consensus about important patient needs for cancer care, but characterized these needs differently.


CONCLUSIONS
Our experience with multiperspective analysis revealed a methodology that delivers novel relational findings, but is best conducted de novo rather than as part of a larger study.


CONCLUSIONS
Multiperspective analysis should be more widely adopted with clear aims and analytic strategy that strengthen the ability to reveal relational dynamics. Navigation training programs should anticipate navigator struggles and provide navigators with tools to manage them.
University of Rochester, Department of Family Medicine, Rochester, NY 14620, USA. Amanat_Yosha@urmc.rochester.edu
Amanat M
AM
Yosha
Jennifer K
JK
Carroll
Samantha
S
Hendren
Charcy M
CM
Salamone
Mechelle
M
Sanders
Kevin
K
Fiscella
Ronald M
RM
Epstein
D003266:Continuity of Patient Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D010349:Patient Compliance; D024382:Professional Role; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D015397:Program Evaluation; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jun 10;162(11):1257-65
12038944
BMC Cancer. 2010 Oct 13;10:551
20939928
J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):111-20
20407860
Cancer Pract. 1995 Jan-Feb;3(1):19-30
7704057
Cancer Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):127-40
20142736
Cancer Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;29(5):367-77
17006110
BMJ. 2004 Jun 5;328(7452):1343
15151964
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Jul;22(6):943-53
7567612
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):241-7
20006459
BMJ. 2009 Oct 14;339:b4122
19828645
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Oct;11(5):633-9
17962171