A technical solution to improving palliative and hospice care.
OBJECTIVE
This project sought to help palliative and hospice care practices improve patient care quality and operational efficiency by improving patient symptom status reporting and symptom management, reducing associated provider documentation workload, and enhancing patient-provider and provider-provider communication. We developed a user-friendly, electronic medical record-compatible, software prototype that allows typical clinical data and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to be entered and stored. This data is immediately available during the clinical encounter with graphically depicted summaries for patient history and PRO assessments, a trending feature that links symptom behavior to interventions and the Edmonton Labeled Visual Information System.


METHODS
A user-centered design approach allowed for iterative cycles of needs/usability feedback from providers and patients/caregivers to be incorporated into the development of our prototype's technical structure and features. To determine the needs and initial usability of the project's prototype, we interviewed eight providers and 18 patients/caregivers. Another usability test, consisting of patient/caregiver (n = 18) and provider (n = 9) interviews, assessed the functioning prototype's design, usability, and usefulness.


RESULTS
Patients/caregivers (n = 18) reported that the prototype was usable (100%), it would facilitate patient-provider communication, shared decision making, and self-management (100%), and they would be willing to try the system and recommend it to their providers (100%). The providers (n = 9) felt that the prototype encouraged better use of patient assessments in decision making and patient care (100%) and improved identification of cause/temporal relationship between care events and outcomes (100%), monitoring of patient status (100%), communication in a multi-disciplinary team (100%), and operational efficiency and patient care quality (88.9%).


CONCLUSIONS
Quality of patient care and operational efficiency can be improved with an effective assessment, evaluation, and communication tool. This project developed an electronic version of such a tool. Future efforts will hone its usability and integration across multiple hospice/palliative care settings.
Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA. makallen@mdanderson.org
Michael A
MA
Kallen
DerShung
D
Yang
Niina
N
Haas
D017028:Caregivers / Q000523:psychology; D003142:Communication; D003657:Decision Making; D057286:Electronic Health Records; D017051:Hospice Care / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy; D010166:Palliative Care / Q000592:standards*; D005791:Patient Care / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D010358:Patient Participation; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D012648:Self Care
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:24-34
18758194
JAMA. 1984 Oct 12;252(14):1905-7
6471323
Am J Psychiatry. 1974 Oct;131(10):1121-3
4416585
J Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;8(6):1176-85
16351531
J Med Liban. 2008 Apr-Jun;56(2):129-31
19534083
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Jan;21(1):4-11
11223309
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Oct;46(10):1242-50
9777906
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(S1):S187-93
10809474
JAMA. 1995 Nov 22-29;274(20):1591-8
7474243
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Mar;13(3):128-37
9114631
Palliat Med. 2005 Sep;19(6):466-76
16218159
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Jun;16(6):547-55
18320239
Cancer. 2000 Jun 15;88(12):2859-67
10870073
J Med Liban. 2008 Apr-Jun;56(2):105-11
19534079
J Palliat Care. 1991 Summer;7(2):6-9
1714502
Cancer. 2000 May 1;88(9):2164-71
10813730
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2008 Sep;14(9):459-64
19060798
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Dec;22(6):1035-41
11738166