Tears at the rotator cuff footprint: prevalence and imaging characteristics in 305 MR arthrograms of the shoulder.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the prevalence, imaging characteristics and anatomical distribution of tears at the rotator cuff (RC) footprint with MR arthrography (MR-A) of the shoulder.


METHODS
MR arthrograms obtained in 305 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsions (PASTA), concealed interstitial delaminations (CID), reverse PASTA lesions and full-thickness tears (FT) at the humeral tendon insertion were depicted. Anatomical locations were determined and depths of tears were classified.


RESULTS
112/305 patients showed RC tears, including 63 patients with 68 footprint tears. 34 PASTA lesions were detected with 20/34 involving the anterior supraspinatus (SSP) tendon and 17/34 PASTA lesions were grade I lesions. Most CID lesions (14/23) occurred at the posterior SSP and 20/23 were classified as grade I or II. 9 FT and 2 reverse PASTA lesions were found. Statistical analysis revealed no difference in anatomical location (p = 0.903) and no correlation with overhead sports activity (p = 0.300) or history of trauma (p = 0.928). There were significantly more PASTA lesions in patients < 40 years of age (p = 0.029).


CONCLUSIONS
Most RC tears detected with MR-A involve the SSP footprint and are articular-sided with predominance in younger patients, but concealed lesions are not as uncommon as previously thought.
Department of Radiology, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany. schaeffeler@me.com
Christoph
C
Schaeffeler
Dirk
D
Mueller
Chlodwig
C
Kirchhoff
Petra
P
Wolf
Ernst J
EJ
Rummeny
Klaus
K
Woertler
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D015995:Prevalence; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D000070636:Rotator Cuff Injuries; D013708:Tendon Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):90-6
18069008
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Oct;68(1):36-56
18387766
Arthroscopy. 2009 Mar;25(3):305-20
19245995
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1124-8
16282408
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):943-6
17885069
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Feb;14(1):51-67
12606869
J Rheumatol. 1998 Aug;25(8):1612-5
9712108
Radiol Clin North Am. 2006 Jul;44(4):503-23, vii-viii
16829246
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May;(254):35-8
2323147
Radiology. 1989 Jul;172(1):223-9
2740508
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May;(254):64-74
2182260
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jun;192(6):1701-7
19457838
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec;17(6):909-13
18818103
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Jan;85(1):3-11
12585570
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):564-9
20118499
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):962-9
18451386
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 May;80(5):733-48
9611036
Radiology. 1997 Jul;204(1):191-4
9205245
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jul;90(7):827-32
18591587
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jan;73(1):17-29
1985990
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87 Suppl 2:81-8
16326727
Arthroscopy. 2006 Dec;22(12):1298-303
17157728
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):60-7
8020235
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972 Jan;54(1):41-50
5054450
Skeletal Radiol. 1998 May;27(5):237-43
9638832
Arthroscopy. 1991;7(1):1-7
2009105
Eur Radiol. 2007 Feb;17(2):491-8
16969638