Specifying the attentional selection that moderates the fearlessness of psychopathic offenders.
Our previous research demonstrated that psychopathy-related fear deficits involve abnormalities in attention that undermine sensitivity to peripheral information. In the present study, we specified this attention-mediated abnormality in a new sample of 87 prisoners assessed with Hare's Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (Hare, 2003). We measured fear-potentiated startle (FPS) under four conditions that crossed attentional focus (threat vs. alternative) with early versus late presentation of threat cues. The psychopathic deficit in FPS was apparent only in the early-alternative-focus condition, in which threat cues were presented after the alternative goal-directed focus was established. Furthermore, psychopathy interacted with working memory capacity in the late-alternative-focus condition, which suggests that individuals high in psychopathy and working memory capacity were able to maintain a set-related alternative focus that reduced FPS. The results not only provide new evidence that attention moderates the fearlessness of psychopathic individuals, but also implicate an early attention bottleneck as a proximal mechanism for deficient response modulation in psychopathy.
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, 1202 W. Johnson St., Madison, WI 53706, USA. baskinsommer@wisc.edu
Arielle R
AR
Baskin-Sommers
John J
JJ
Curtin
Joseph P
JP
Newman
D000328:Adult; D000987:Antisocial Personality Disorder / Q000523:psychology*; D001288:Attention; D003071:Cognition; D003213:Conditioning, Psychological; D057237:Criminals / Q000523:psychology*; D003463:Cues; D005239:Fear / Q000523:psychology*; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D008875:Middle Aged; D011329:Prisoners / Q000523:psychology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D013216:Reflex, Startle
Br J Psychol. 2001 Feb;92(Pt 1):53-78
11256770
Exp Brain Res. 1988;69(2):225-44
3345805
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:27-53
16318588
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):135-49
2137515
Psychophysiology. 2005 Jan;42(1):1-15
15720576
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):781-7
9448241
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Aug;118(3):554-63
19685952
J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 8;29(27):8726-33
19587279
J Neurosci. 1991 Aug;11(8):2383-402
1869921
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:57-78
17417935
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:315-41
10845067
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1656-74
9861716
Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):201-8
16324792
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44
1431742
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Feb;35(1):116-24
12723786
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11458-63
12177449
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Dec;17(12):1907-22
16356328
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1257-70
9770220
Int J Neurosci. 1995;80(1-4):281-97
7775053
Biol Psychol. 2006 Jun;72(3):265-70
16343731
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
7605061
Psychophysiology. 1983 Mar;20(2):146-51
6844513
Neuropsychology. 2004 Jan;18(1):50-59
14744187
Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):716-36
8255955
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):71-8
21038928
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54
15355143
J Abnorm Psychol. 2006 Aug;115(3):559-66
16866596
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jan 1;67(1):66-70
19793581
Psychol Rev. 1963 Jan;70:80-90
14027390
J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 Aug;95(3):252-6
3745647