Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing.
In real-life situations, eyewitnesses often have control over the level of generality in which they choose to report event information. In the present study, we adopted an early-intervention approach to investigate to what extent eyewitness memory may be inoculated against suggestibility, following two different levels of interpolated reporting: verbatim and gist. After viewing a target event, participants responded to interpolated questions that required reporting of target details at either the verbatim or the gist level. After 48 hr, both groups of participants were misled about half of the target details and were finally tested for verbatim memory of all the details. The findings were consistent with our predictions: Whereas verbatim testing was successful in completely inoculating against suggestibility, gist testing did not reduce it whatsoever. These findings are particularly interesting in light of the comparable testing effects found for these two modes of interpolated testing.
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel. pansky@research.haifa.ac.il
Ainat
A
Pansky
Einat
E
Tenenboim
D032882:Comprehension; D008192:Deception; D005793:Generalization, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D013404:Suggestion; D014342:Truth Disclosure
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):268-76
16752591
J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 May;73(1):45-71
10196074
Mem Cognit. 2001 Dec;29(8):1120-9
11913748
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55
16507066
Mem Cognit. 1992 Nov;20(6):633-42
1435266
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1985 Mar;114(1):1-16
3156942
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1990;55(3-4):1-93; discussion 94-109
2287345
Mem Cognit. 2005 Jul;33(5):770-82
16383166
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):248-55
20919785
Mem Cognit. 1986 Jul;14(4):329-38
3762387
Am Psychol. 2000 Jun;55(6):581-98
10892200
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):66-73
19037905
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):553-71
17087573
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):852-7
16524001
Mem Cognit. 1989 Jul;17(4):423-34
2761400
Mem Cognit. 2007 Sep;35(6):1255-66
18035625
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Mar;131(1):73-95
11900105
Mem Cognit. 2001 Oct;29(7):940-7
11820753
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Mar;14(1):50-60
18377166
Mem Cognit. 1983 Sep;11(5):467-75
6656606
Learn Mem. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):361-6
16027179
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Apr;34(2):105-17
19301110
J Appl Psychol. 1988 Aug;73(3):371-7
3182548
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1978 Jan;4(1):19-31
621467
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1563-9
19857026
Mem Cognit. 1989 May;17(3):349-58
2725271
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:41-100
11605365
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):934-45
8064252
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;1(3):181-210
26151629
Psychol Sci. 2004 Jan;15(1):52-9
14717832
Memory. 2002 May;10(3):179-85
11958722
J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 Nov;71(2):81-129
9843617
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002 Jun;8(2):127-42
12075691
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Mar;15(2):246-55
2522514
Memory. 2008 Jan;16(1):58-75
17852727
Memory. 2003 Nov;11(6):571-80
14982124
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):180-9
10783535
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1792-800
22582965
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Sep;89(1):53-71
15336918
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):813-25
14516215