Efficacy of washing meat surfaces with 2% levulinic, acetic, or lactic acid for pathogen decontamination and residual growth inhibition.
We compared spray washing at 55.4 °C with 2% levulinic acid to that with lactic or acetic acid for decontamination of pathogenic bacteria inoculated onto meat surfaces, and their residual protection against later growth of pathogenic bacteria. The model systems included Escherichia coli O157:H7 on beef plate, Salmonella on chicken skin and pork belly, and Listeria monocytogenes on turkey roll. In the decontamination studies, acid washes lowered recoverable numbers of pathogens by 0.6 to 1 log/cm(2) as compared to no-wash controls, and only lactic acid lowered the number of pathogens recovered as compared to the water wash. Washing with levulinic acid at 68.3 or 76.7 °C did not result in additional decontamination of E. coli. Acetic acid prevented residual growth of E. coli and L. monocytogenes, and it reduced numbers of Salmonella on chicken skin to below recoverable levels. Overall, levulinic acid did not provide as effective decontamination as lactic acid nor residual protection as acetic acid.
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-8700, USA. chuck.carpenter@usu.edu
C E
CE
Carpenter
J V
JV
Smith
J R
JR
Broadbent
D019342:Acetic Acid / Q000494:pharmacology; D000818:Animals; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000494:pharmacology*; D001419:Bacteria / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development; D005516:Food Microbiology; D005519:Food Preservation / Q000379:methods*; D019344:Lactic Acid / Q000494:pharmacology; D007982:Levulinic Acids / Q000494:pharmacology*; D008460:Meat / Q000382:microbiology*
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D007982:Levulinic Acids; D019344:Lactic Acid; D019342:Acetic Acid; C032246:levulinic acid