Assessing the acceptability and usability of an interactive serious game in aiding treatment decisions for patients with localized prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND
Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer face a potentially life-altering treatment decision that can be overwhelming. Enhancing patient knowledge through education can significantly reduce feelings of uncertainty while simultaneously increasing confidence in decision making. Serious games have been shown in other populations to increase health knowledge and assist with the health decision-making process. We developed an interactive serious game, Time After Time, which translates evidence-based treatment outcome data into an accessible and understandable format that men can utilize in their prostate cancer treatment decision-making process. The game specifically aims to raise men's awareness and understanding of the impact of health-related quality of life issues associated with the major treatment options and to enrich their conversations with their health care providers.


OBJECTIVE
This study determined the acceptability and usability of the alpha version of Time After Time, an interactive decision aid for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, in order to inform future iterations of the serious game.


METHODS
The study employed a mixed methods approach to assess the acceptability and usability of the Time After Time serious game using qualitative focus groups and a quantitative Likert scale survey.


RESULTS
A total of 13 men who had already completed treatment for localized prostate cancer completed the survey and participated in focus group meetings. The majority of the study participants rated Time After Time as an appropriate decision tool for localized prostate cancer and verified that it meets its goals of increasing focus on side effects and generating questions for the patient's health care team. However, participants also expressed concerns about game usability and the diversity of information covered regarding treatment options and potential treatment outcomes.


CONCLUSIONS
Serious games are a promising approach to health education and decision support for older men. Participants were receptive to the idea of a serious game as a decision aid in localized prostate cancer. However, usability issues are a major concern for this demographic, as is clarity and transparency of data sources.
The Abramson Center for the Future of Health, a joint effort of The Methodist Hospital Research Institute and College of Technology, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Lindsey
L
Reichlin
Nithya
N
Mani
Kara
K
McArthur
Amy M
AM
Harris
Nithin
N
Rajan
Clifford C
CC
Dacso
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003201:Computers; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D017144:Focus Groups; D005717:Games, Experimental; D006266:Health Education / Q000379:methods; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D011788:Quality of Life; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Nov;61(10):2252-64
15922501
J Ambul Care Manage. 2001 Jan;24(1):26-38
11189794
BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):780-5
17578466
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Jun;51(3):320-5
9229064
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 1;30(23):2689-94
16319756
Med Decis Making. 2005 Jan-Feb;25(1):96-105
15673587
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
1593914
J Clin Nurs. 1999 Nov;8(6):631-42
10827609
BJU Int. 2004 Jan;93(1):52-6; discussion 56
14678367
BJU Int. 2003 Jan;91(1):14-7
12614242
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Feb;8(2):148-54
20141675
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 20;23(12):2772-80
15837992
Circulation. 2009 Mar 17;119(10):1442-52
19289649
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49
19474385
JAMA. 2000 Jun 28;283(24):3217-22
10866869
Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63
8450681
Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):765-77
19140648
Gerontologist. 1983 Aug;23(4):361-3
6618244
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61
18354103
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Mar-Apr;60(2):99-119
20228384
Cancer. 2006 Aug 1;107(3):620-30
16802287
Urology. 2006 Dec;68(6):1224-9
17141840
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Nov-Dec;59(6):379-90
19841280
Cancer Invest. 2007 Sep;25(6):449-57
17882657
Urol Int. 2008;81(4):383-8
19077396
J Urol. 1999 Aug;162(2):407
10411048
Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1632-4
10547533
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905
11113727
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Jul-Sep;23(3):205-10
19812460
BMC Cancer. 2009 Aug 24;9:296
19703300
Gerontologist. 1994 Aug;34(4):553-6
7959116
World J Urol. 2004 Dec;22(6):441-8
15378335
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):435-48
18252677
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 15;20(2):557-66
11786586
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Nov;77(2):302-7
19386460
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):120-5
20478590
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Sep;41(3):263-70
17707296
Med Care. 2001 Oct;39(10):1118-30
11567174
Acad Med. 1997 Jul;72(7):627-30
9236473