A simple model for the influence of meiotic conversion tracts on GC content.
A strong correlation between GC content and recombination rate is observed in many eukaryotes, which is thought to be due to conversion events linked to the repair of meiotic double-strand breaks. In several organisms, the length of conversion tracts has been shown to decrease exponentially with increasing distance from the sites of meiotic double-strand breaks. I show here that this behavior leads to a simple analytical model for the evolution and the equilibrium state of the GC content of sequences devoid of meiotic double-strand break sites. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, meiotic double-strand breaks are practically excluded from protein-coding sequences. A good fit was observed between the predictions of the model and the variations of the average GC content of the third codon position (GC3) of S. cerevisiae genes. Moreover, recombination parameters that can be extracted by fitting the data to the model coincide with experimentally determined values. These results thus indicate that meiotic recombination plays an important part in determining the fluctuations of GC content in yeast coding sequences. The model also accounted for the different patterns of GC variations observed in the genes of Candida species that exhibit a variety of sexual lifestyles, and hence a wide range of meiotic recombination rates. Finally, the variations of the average GC3 content of human and chicken coding sequences could also be fitted by the model. These results suggest the existence of a widespread pattern of GC variation in eukaryotic genes due to meiotic recombination, which would imply the generality of two features of meiotic recombination: its association with GC-biased gene conversion and the quasi-exclusion of meiotic double-strand breaks from coding sequences. Moreover, the model points out to specific constraints on protein fragments encoded by exon terminal sequences, which are the most affected by the GC bias.
Institut de Biologie et de Technologies de Saclay, CEA/Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. mcmk@cea.fr
Marie-Claude
MC
Marsolier-Kergoat
D000818:Animals; D001482:Base Composition; D001483:Base Sequence; D002175:Candida / Q000235:genetics; D002645:Chickens; D053903:DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; D004271:DNA, Fungal / Q000235:genetics; D005785:Gene Conversion / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D008540:Meiosis; D008957:Models, Genetic; D011995:Recombination, Genetic; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000235:genetics
D004271:DNA, Fungal
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 May;2(5):360-9
11331902
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Nov;25(11):2439-44
18723832
Science. 2005 Oct 14;310(5746):321-4
16224025
Genetics. 2009 Sep;183(1):31-8
19546316
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Jun;23(6):1203-16
16551647
Genome Res. 2009 Mar;19(3):510-9
19088305
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7847-52
20385822
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 10;97(21):11383-90
11027339
Nature. 2009 Jun 4;459(7247):657-62
19465905
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):836-40
20044539
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1181-97
12082137
PLoS Genet. 2008 May 09;4(5):e1000071
18464896
Genetics. 1994 Aug;137(4):1019-26
7982556
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Apr;38(7):2346-54
20081202
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Apr 15;48:582-92
13918161
PLoS Biol. 2007 Dec;5(12):e324
18076285
Eukaryot Cell. 2007 Jun;6(6):1041-52
17416899
Curr Biol. 2009 Jun 9;19(11):891-9
19446455
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 13;94(10):5213-8
9144217
PLoS Biol. 2008 May 6;6(5):e110
18462019
Nat Genet. 2002 Jul;31(3):241-7
12053178
Cell. 2010 Aug 20;142(4):646, 646.e1
20723763
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jun;21(6):984-90
14963104
Nature. 2008 Jul 24;454(7203):479-85
18615017
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):876-9
20044541
Nature. 2003 May 15;423(6937):241-54
12748633
EMBO J. 2009 Jan 21;28(2):99-111
19078966
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Jun;63(2):349-404
10357855
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009;10:285-311
19630562
Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 4;17(23):2003-12
18060788
Trends Genet. 2003 Sep;19(9):514-22
12957545
J Mol Biol. 1987 Jul 20;196(2):261-82
3656447
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 8;98(10):5688-92
11320215