Dissecting the within-Africa ancestry of populations of African descent in the Americas.
BACKGROUND
The ancestry of African-descended Americans is known to be drawn from three distinct populations: African, European, and Native American. While many studies consider this continental admixture, few account for the genetically distinct sources of ancestry within Africa--the continent with the highest genetic variation. Here, we dissect the within-Africa genetic ancestry of various populations of the Americas self-identified as having primarily African ancestry using uniparentally inherited mitochondrial DNA.


RESULTS
We first confirmed that our results obtained using uniparentally-derived group admixture estimates are correlated with the average autosomal-derived individual admixture estimates (hence are relevant to genomic ancestry) by assessing continental admixture using both types of markers (mtDNA and Y-chromosome vs. ancestry informative markers). We then focused on the within-Africa maternal ancestry, mining our comprehensive database of published mtDNA variation (∼5800 individuals from 143 African populations) that helped us thoroughly dissect the African mtDNA pool. Using this well-defined African mtDNA variation, we quantified the relative contributions of maternal genetic ancestry from multiple W/WC/SW/SE (West to South East) African populations to the different pools of today's African-descended Americans of North and South America and the Caribbean.


CONCLUSIONS
Our analysis revealed that both continental admixture and within-Africa admixture may be critical to achieving an adequate understanding of the ancestry of African-descended Americans. While continental ancestry reflects gender-specific admixture processes influenced by different socio-historical practices in the Americas, the within-Africa maternal ancestry reflects the diverse colonial histories of the slave trade. We have confirmed that there is a genetic thread connecting Africa and the Americas, where each colonial system supplied their colonies in the Americas with slaves from African colonies they controlled or that were available for them at the time. This historical connection is reflected in different relative contributions from populations of W/WC/SW/SE Africa to geographically distinct Africa-derived populations of the Americas, adding to the complexity of genomic ancestry in groups ostensibly united by the same demographic label.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America. Klara.Stefflova@cancer.org.uk
Klara
K
Stefflova
Matthew C
MC
Dulik
Jill S
JS
Barnholtz-Sloan
Athma A
AA
Pai
Amy H
AH
Walker
Timothy R
TR
Rebbeck
D001741:Black or African American / Q000235:genetics*; D044383:Black People / Q000235:genetics*; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics*; D057225:Data Mining; D006801:Humans
D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial
Ann Hum Genet. 2006 Jan;70(Pt 1):98-115
16441260
Hum Hered. 2008;65(1):23-32
17652961
Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Oct;79(4):640-9
16960800
Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Nov;71(Pt 6):782-90
17596204
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Mar;17(3):471-7
18349264
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Dec;63(6):1839-51
9837836
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 25;4(11):e7842
19946364
Am J Hum Biol. 2008 Sep-Oct;20(5):584-91
18442080
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 12;107(2):786-91
20080753
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;71(5):1082-111
12395296
Am J Hum Biol. 2004 May-Jun;16(3):289-97
15101054
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Aug;127(4):427-38
15624208
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Aug;67(2):444-61
10873790
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Jul 21;8:213
18644108
Genet Mol Biol. 2009 Jan;32(1):1-11
21637639
Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Mar;74(3):454-65
14872407
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 May;26(4):305-15
15095390
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Mar 22;167(1):77-80
16448796
Science. 2009 May 22;324(5930):1035-44
19407144
Genet Mol Res. 2007 May 09;6(2):256-61
17573655
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002 May;118(1):33-44
11953943
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jun;17(6):1329-38
18559547
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:403-33
18593304
Mol Ecol. 2002 Dec;11(12):2571-81
12453240
Genome Res. 2008 May;18(5):830-8
18385274
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Jul;27(1):14-20
15185399
Hum Biol. 2006 Feb;78(1):29-41
16900880
Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Jan;50(1):145-55
1729885
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Apr;18(4):672-5
11264419
Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Apr;78(4):680-90
16532397
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1999 Jun;109(2):175-80
10378456
Nat Genet. 2004 Apr;36(4):388-93
15052270
Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
19325852
Hum Genet. 2007 Jan;120(5):713-22
17006671
Ann Hum Genet. 2008 Jan;72(Pt 1):90-8
17908263
Hum Biol. 2004 Feb;76(1):77-86
15222681
Hum Hered. 2005;60(3):129-33
16282694
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Dec 1;164(1):45-55
16337103
Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479-91
1644282
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Sep;61(3):691-704
9326335
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Sep;128(1):131-55
15693025
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 5;105(5):1596-601
18216239
Hum Genet. 2002 Dec;111(6):566-9
12436248
Genome Biol. 2009;10(12):R141
20025784
Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Oct;77(4):676-80
16175514
Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):457-62
7705646
Ann Hum Genet. 2010 Jan;74(1):65-76
20059473
Hum Mutat. 2008 May;29(5):648-58
18286470
Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Jul;26(7):1581-9
19369595
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Nov;67(5):1287-95
11032790
Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:539-64
18076332
Hum Genet. 2007 Jun;121(5):565-75
17356887
Mol Biol Evol. 1993 May;10(3):512-26
8336541
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
10835412
Am J Hum Biol. 2006 Nov-Dec;18(6):829-37
17039481
Nat Genet. 2004 May;36(5):512-7
15052271
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Jan;114(1):18-29
11150049
Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 Jul;13(7):867-76
15856073
Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87
12930761