Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.
BACKGROUND
Speech-in-noise (SIN) perception is one of the most complex tasks faced by listeners on a daily basis. Although listening in noise presents challenges for all listeners, background noise inordinately affects speech perception in older adults and in children with learning disabilities. Hearing thresholds are an important factor in SIN perception, but they are not the only factor. For successful comprehension, the listener must perceive and attend to relevant speech features, such as the pitch, timing, and timbre of the target speaker's voice. Here, we review recent studies linking SIN and brainstem processing of speech sounds.


OBJECTIVE
To review recent work that has examined the ability of the auditory brainstem response to complex sounds (cABR), which reflects the nervous system's transcription of pitch, timing, and timbre, to be used as an objective neural index for hearing-in-noise abilities.


METHODS
We examined speech-evoked brainstem responses in a variety of populations, including children who are typically developing, children with language-based learning impairment, young adults, older adults, and auditory experts (i.e., musicians).


METHODS
In a number of studies, we recorded brainstem responses in quiet and babble noise conditions to the speech syllable /da/ in all age groups, as well as in a variable condition in children in which /da/ was presented in the context of seven other speech sounds. We also measured speech-in-noise perception using the Hearing-in-Noise Test (HINT) and the Quick Speech-in-Noise Test (QuickSIN).


RESULTS
Children and adults with poor SIN perception have deficits in the subcortical spectrotemporal representation of speech, including low-frequency spectral magnitudes and the timing of transient response peaks. Furthermore, auditory expertise, as engendered by musical training, provides both behavioral and neural advantages for processing speech in noise.


CONCLUSIONS
These results have implications for future assessment and management strategies for young and old populations whose primary complaint is difficulty hearing in background noise. The cABR provides a clinically applicable metric for objective assessment of individuals with SIN deficits, for determination of the biologic nature of disorders affecting SIN perception, for evaluation of appropriate hearing aid algorithms, and for monitoring the efficacy of auditory remediation and training.
Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, IL, USA.
Samira
S
Anderson
Nina
N
Kraus
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D016057:Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem / Q000502:physiology*; D006309:Hearing / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D009622:Noise; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 2;104(40):15894-8
17898180
J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5545-52
12843255
Hear Res. 2008 Nov;245(1-2):35-47
18765275
Hear Res. 1997 Apr;106(1-2):95-104
9112109
Int J Neurosci. 1981;12(2):137-45
7203823
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jul 5;97(14):8081-6
10884432
J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 11;29(45):14100-7
19906958
Hear Res. 2010 Dec 1;270(1-2):151-7
20708671
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13022-7
19617560
J Neurosci. 2008 Nov 12;28(46):11925-38
19005058
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jul;8(7):862-3
15924138
Dev Sci. 2009 Jul;12(4):557-67
19635083
J Neurosci. 2009 May 6;29(18):5832-40
19420250
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Jan;102(1):46-53
9060854
Audiol Neurootol. 1998 Mar-Jun;3(2-3):104-22
9575380
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:543-57
19673837
Neuron. 2009 May 28;62(4):463-9
19477149
Hear Res. 2007 Jul;229(1-2):116-31
17307315
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jan 6;156(1):95-103
15474654
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405
15532670
J Neurosci. 2005 Oct 26;25(43):9850-7
16251432
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Feb;161(1):1-10
15551089
Trends Amplif. 2008 Dec;12(4):316-31
18974203
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Feb;46(1):80-97
12647890
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:209-13
19673783
Neuroreport. 1995 Nov 27;6(17):2363-7
8747154
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Oct;15(10):1609-20
15716469
Neuroreport. 1998 Jun 1;9(8):1889-93
9665621
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Sep;5(9):721-8
15322530
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Feb;29(3):661-8
19222564
Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 May;112(5):758-67
11336890
J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 12;26(15):4046-53
16611821
J Neurosci. 2008 May 7;28(19):4929-37
18463246
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 May;120(5):959-66
19346159
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Sep;102(3):1811-20
9301058
Biol Psychol. 2004 Nov;67(3):299-317
15294388
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Oct;8(10):457-64
15450510
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Dec;118(6):3874-88
16419830
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;122(2):346-55
20719558
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 May;77(5):1861-7
3998296
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Mar;19(3):376-85
17335387
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Dec;9(12):1558-64
17115044
Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11(4):233-41
16675898
Neuron. 2009 Nov 12;64(3):311-9
19914180
Audiol Neurootol. 2008;13(5):335-44
18493120
J Am Acad Audiol. 1996 Jun;7(3):161-7
8780988
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Feb;107(2):970-7
10687706
Dev Sci. 2009 Sep;12(5):732-45
19702766
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Apr;57(4):594-603
19220558
Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):302-24
20084007
Am J Audiol. 2002 Jun 1;11(1):12
26650506
Hear Res. 2006 Sep;219(1-2):36-47
16839723
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):161-8
15935624
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2699-707
19293398
Neuron. 2009 Feb 12;61(3):467-80
19217382
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov;11(11):458-65
17983834
Int J Audiol. 2011 Jan;50(1):14-26
21047294
Trends Amplif. 2008 Dec;12(4):283-99
18974202
Brain Lang. 2009 Jan;108(1):1-9
18343493
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Aug;92(2):1088-104
15044521
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Nov;6(11):1216-23
14583754
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Oct;20(10):1892-902
18370594
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Feb;121(2):1070-6
17348529
J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 7;30(14):4922-6
20371812
Ear Hear. 2009 Dec;30(6):653-61
19734788
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jul;114(7):1332-43
12842732
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 27;102(39):14110-5
16162673
Psychophysiology. 2010 Mar 1;47(2):236-46
19824950
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Oct;4(10):783-94
14523378
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):420-2
17351633
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Aug;11(8):599-605
20648064
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2268-79
20681749
J Am Acad Audiol. 2006 Sep;17(8):538-58
16999250
Neuroreport. 2009 Mar 4;20(4):408-13
19223793
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 May;61(5):735-51
17853231
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Sep;115(9):2021-30
15294204
Hear Res. 2005 Aug;206(1-2):159-76
16081006
Biol Psychol. 1990 Feb;30(1):21-33
2223933
J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 23;25(47):10952-9
16306408
Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):780-99
17723030