Resident experience on reproductive endocrinology and infertility rotations and perceived knowledge.
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the extent to which duration and quality of reproductive endocrinology rotations are associated with residents' knowledge of reproductive endocrinology and infertility.


METHODS
An anonymous, multiple-choice survey was provided to 4,744 examinees during the 2008 Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology In-Training Examination. The survey queried residents' experiences on their reproductive endocrinology and infertility rotation, satisfaction with the quality and duration of the rotation, and knowledge of reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Binomial regression was used to estimate the relationship between components of the reproductive endocrinology and infertility rotation and self-reported knowledge of reproductive endocrinology and infertility.


RESULTS
Forty percent of residents described their knowledge of reproductive endocrinology and infertility as poor. Fewer weeks dedicated to reproductive endocrinology and infertility increased the risk of poor knowledge (P<.001). Required vacation during the rotation and non-reproductive endocrinology and infertility coverage more than two times a week was associated with a 40% increase in risk of perceived poor knowledge (relative risk [RR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]): 1.20-1.60; and RR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.16-1.70, respectively), while 3 hours of didactics per week were associated with a 61% reduction in risk (RR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.31-0.50).


CONCLUSIONS
A number of residents perceive their knowledge of reproductive endocrinology and infertility to be poor. Conflicting commitments during the reproductive endocrinology rotation results in both lower satisfaction and less knowledge. There is the potential to improve resident knowledge of reproductive endocrinology and infertility, and perhaps other aspects of obstetrics and gynecology training, with focused rotations, including didactics.


METHODS
II.
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Anne Z
AZ
Steiner
Marc
M
Fritz
Cynthia K
CK
Sites
Christos
C
Coutifaris
Bruce R
BR
Carr
Kurt
K
Barnhart
D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004704:Endocrinology / Q000193:education; D006801:Humans; D007246:Infertility; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D018456:Reproductive Medicine / Q000193:education*
Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology. CREOG's educational objective: a core curriculum in obstetrics and gynecology. 9th ed. New York (NY): Professional Publishing Group, Ltd; 2009.
StataCorp. 2009. Stata: Release 11. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Wren BG. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Aust Fam Physician 1998;27:371–7.
Deligeoroglou E, Tsimaris P, Deliveliotou A, Christopoulos P, Creatsas G. Menstrual disorders during adolescence. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2006;3(suppl 1):150–9.
Lu G, Owen J, Wenstrom K. Obstetrics and gynecology residents' attitudes toward maternal-fetal medicine fellowship training. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;16:259–63.
Gordon MJ. A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Acad Med 1991;66:762–9.
Hawkins RE, Sumption KF, Gaglione MM, Holmboe ES. The in-training examination in internal medicine: resident perceptions and lack of correlation between resident scores and faculty predictions of resident performance. Am J Med 1999;106:206–10.
Parker RW, Alford C, Passmore C. Can family medicine residents predict their performance on the in-training examination? Fam Med 2004;36:705–9.
Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE. Methods for evaluating the clinical competence of residents in internal medicine: a review. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:42–8.