Authorship policies of bioethics journals.
Inappropriate authorship is a common problem in biomedical research and may be becoming one in bioethics, due to the increase in multiple authorship. This paper investigates the authorship policies of bioethics journals to determine whether they provide adequate guidance for researchers who submit articles for publication, which can help deter inappropriate authorship. It was found that 63.3% of bioethics journals provide no guidance on authorship; 36.7% provide guidance on which contributions merit authorship, 23.3% provide guidance on which contributions do not merit authorship, 23.3% require authors to take responsibility for their contributions or for the article as a whole, 20% provide guidance on which contributions merit an acknowledgement but not authorship, 6.7% require authors to describe their contributions, and only 3.3% distinguish between authorship in empirical and conceptual research. To provide authors with effective guidance and promote integrity in bioethics research, bioethics journals should adopt authorship policies that address several important topics, such as the qualifications for authorship, describing authorship contributions, taking responsibility for the research and the difference between authorship in empirical and conceptual research.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. resnikd@niehs.nih.gov
David B
DB
Resnik
Zubin
Z
Master
D001319:Authorship / Q000592:standards*; D001675:Bioethics; D035081:Editorial Policies; D036262:Empirical Research; D006801:Humans; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards*
Bioethics. 2006 Aug;20(4):213-20
17044155
Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Nov-Dec;33(6):13-27
14983554
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):216-7
9676658
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Nov;59(9):1949-54
15312928
Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):31-45
15652225
Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8
15944677
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):875-7
19473810
PLoS Med. 2007 Jan;4(1):e19
17227134
JAMA. 1997 Aug 20;278(7):579-85
9268280
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jun;35(6):348-53
19482976
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Oct;85(10):920-7
20884825
Neurosurgery. 2000 Aug;47(2):435-40
10942017
CMAJ. 2007 Jan 2;176(1):41-6
17200389
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2769-71
12038907
Science. 1995 Apr 7;268(5207):25
7701334
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):222-4
9676661
MedGenMed. 2007 Jul 19;9(3):16
18092023
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2007 Jan;(152):1-26
17206953
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):219-48, 211
18547191