Comparing the similarity and spatial structure of neural representations: a pattern-component model.
In recent years there has been growing interest in multivariate analyses of neuroimaging data, which can be used to detect distributed patterns of activity that encode an experimental factor of interest. In this setting, it has become common practice to study the correlations between patterns to make inferences about the way a brain region represents stimuli or tasks (known as representational similarity analysis). Although it would be of great interest to compare these correlations from different regions, direct comparisons are currently not possible. This is because sample correlations are strongly influenced by voxel-selection, fMRI noise, and nonspecific activation patterns, all of which can differ widely between regions. Here, we present a multivariate modeling framework in which the measured patterns are decomposed into their constituent parts. The model is based on a standard linear mixed model, in which pattern components are considered to be randomly distributed over voxels. The model allows one to estimate the true correlations of the underlying neuronal pattern components, thereby enabling comparisons between different regions or individuals. The pattern estimates also allow us to make inferences about the spatial structure of different response components. Thus, the new model provides a theoretical and analytical framework to study the structure of distributed neural representations.
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK. j.diedrichsen@ucl.ac.uk
Jörn
J
Diedrichsen
Gerard R
GR
Ridgway
Karl J
KJ
Friston
Tobias
T
Wiestler
D000465:Algorithms; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008959:Models, Neurological; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013003:Somatosensory Cortex / Q000502:physiology*
Front Syst Neurosci. 2008 Nov 24;2:4
19104670
Nat Neurosci. 2005 May;8(5):686-91
15852013
Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):947-66
18602278
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):103-18
20580933
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3863-8
16537458
Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-15
11771969
Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 26;15(14):1301-7
16051174
Hum Brain Mapp. 1996;4(2):140-51
20408193
Science. 2001 Sep 28;293(5539):2425-30
11577229
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):424-30
16899397
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Feb;45(2):323-30
11180440
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug;104(2):1077-89
20538772
Science. 2009 Oct 16;326(5951):399-403
19833961
Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):181-205
17919928
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Jun;105(6):3042-53
21471398
Neuroimage. 2009 Mar;45(1 Suppl):S199-209
19070668
Neuroimage. 1995 Mar;2(1):45-53
9343589
Neuroimage. 2011 May 15;56(2):593-600
20621701