Effectiveness of Chêneau brace treatment for idiopathic scoliosis: prospective study in 79 patients followed to skeletal maturity.
BACKGROUND
Progressive idiopathic scoliosis can negatively influence the development and functioning of 2-3% of adolescents, with health consequences and economic costs, placing the disease in the centre of interest of the developmental medicine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Chêneau brace in the management of idiopathic scoliosis.


METHODS
A prospective observational study according to SOSORT and SRS recommendations comprised 79 patients (58 girls and 21 boys) with progressive idiopathic scoliosis, treated with Chêneau brace and physiotherapy, with initial Cobb angle between 20 and 45 degrees, no previous brace treatment, Risser 4 or more at the final evaluation and minimum one year follow-up after weaning the brace. Achieving 50° of Cobb angle was considered surgical recommendation.


RESULTS
At follow-up 20 patients (25.3%) improved, 18 patients (22.8%) were stable, 31 patients (39.2%) progressed below 50 degrees and 10 patients (12.7%) progressed beyond 50 degrees (2 of these 10 patients progressed beyond 60 degrees). Progression concerned the younger and less skeletally mature patients.


CONCLUSIONS
Conservative treatment with Chêneau orthosis and physiotherapy was effective in halting scoliosis progression in 48.1% of patients. The results of this study suggest that bracing is effective in reducing the incidence of surgery in comparison with natural history.
Department of Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. kotwicki@ump.edu.pl.
Katarzyna
K
Zaborowska-Sapeta
Ireneusz M
IM
Kowalski
Tomasz
T
Kotwicki
Halina
H
Protasiewicz-Fałdowska
Wojciech
W
Kiebzak
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2068-75; discussion 2076-7
16166897
Pediatr Rehabil. 2003 Jul-Dec;6(3-4):237-42
14713591
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 May;79(5):664-74
9160938
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;135:395-408
18401107
Phys Ther. 2005 Dec;85(12):1329-39
16305271
J Pediatr Orthop. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):84-7
11744860
Scoliosis. 2009 Jan 16;4:2
19149877
Scoliosis. 2006 May 08;1:5
16759357
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 1;31(3):355-66; discussion 367
16449911
Pediatr Rehabil. 2003 Apr-Jun;6(2):111-8
14534048
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 15;28(18):2078-85; discussion 2086
14501917
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1982 Jun;56(6):471-85
7175289
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008 May;3(3):146-53
18465398
Beitr Orthop Traumatol. 1990 Jul;37(7):373-8
2122882
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD006850
20091609
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1995 May-Jun;133(3):270-3
7610709
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Dec 15;24(24):2592-600
10635522
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jan 1;26(1):42-7
11148644
Scoliosis. 2009 Aug 26;4:17
19709435
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jun;77(6):815-22
7782353
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;11(5):379-95
19920281
Int J Rehabil Res. 1994 Mar;17(1):70-4
7960331
Eur Spine J. 2001 Aug;10(4):278-88
11563612
J Biomech. 1984;17(12):923-35
6520140
Eur Spine J. 1999;8(5):406-10
10552325
Clin Orthop. 1958;11:111-9
13561591
Pediatr Rehabil. 2003 Jul-Dec;6(3-4):215-9
14713588
Pediatr Rehabil. 2003 Jul-Dec;6(3-4):209-14
14713587