The relationship between diet breadth and geographic range size in the butterfly subfamily Nymphalinae--a study of global scale.
The "oscillation hypothesis" has been proposed as a general explanation for the exceptional diversification of herbivorous insect species. The hypothesis states that speciation rates are elevated through repeated correlated changes--oscillations--in degree of host plant specificity and geographic range. The aim of this study is to test one of the predictions from the oscillation hypothesis: a positive correlation between diet breadth (number of host plants used) and geographic range size, using the globally distributed butterfly subfamily Nymphalinae. Data on diet breadth and global geographic range were collected for 182 Nymphalinae butterflies species and the size of the geographic range was measured using a GIS. We tested both diet breadth and geographic range size for phylogenetic signal to see if species are independent of each other with respect to these characters. As this test gave inconclusive results, data was analysed both using cross-species comparisons and taking phylogeny into account using generalised estimating equations as applied in the APE package in R. Irrespective of which method was used, we found a significant positive correlation between diet breadth and geographic range size. These results are consistent for two different measures of diet breadth and removal of outliers. We conclude that the global range sizes of Nymphalinae butterflies are correlated to diet breadth. That is, butterflies that feed on a large number of host plants tend to have larger geographic ranges than do butterflies that feed on fewer plants. These results lend support for an important step in the oscillation hypothesis of plant-driven diversification, in that it can provide the necessary fuel for future population fragmentation and speciation.
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. jessica.slove@zoologi.su.se
Jessica
J
Slove
Niklas
N
Janz
D000818:Animals; D002080:Butterflies / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics; D004032:Diet; D049810:Genetic Speciation; D005843:Geography; D010802:Phylogeny; D013045:Species Specificity
Evolution. 1998 Apr;52(2):486-502
28568350
Syst Biol. 2008 Oct;57(5):758-71
18853362
J Evol Biol. 2005 Mar;18(2):325-36
15715839
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 22;277(1701):3735-43
20610430
Evolution. 2001 Mar;55(3):522-37
11327160
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817-8
9918953
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jul;23(7):347-51
18502536
J Evol Biol. 2007 Nov;20(6):2181-91
17887973
J Evol Biol. 2006 Mar;19(2):483-91
16599924
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W700-3
16845102
Ecol Lett. 2008 Nov;11(11):1123-1134
18778274
BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Sep 01;10:266
20807452
BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Jan 18;6:4
16420707
Am Nat. 2003 Apr;161(4):553-66
12776884
Science. 1987 Oct 16;238(4825):360-3
17837117
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Sep;44(3):1257-72
17560801
J Theor Biol. 2002 Sep 21;218(2):175-85
12381290
Cladistics. 2000 Dec;16(4):347-363
34902900
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 22;276(1677):4295-302
19793750
Nature. 1999 Oct 28;401(6756):877-84
10553904
BMC Biol. 2005 Mar 01;3:5
15737240
Evolution. 2001 Apr;55(4):783-96
11392396
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Sep;28(3):473-84
12927132
Am Nat. 1999 May;153(S5):S75-S91
29578779
Evolution. 2002 Aug;56(8):1701-6
12353763
Am Nat. 2006 Jun;167(6):808-25
16685633
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90
14734327
Science. 1998 Jul 24;281(5376):555-9
9677197
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 May 07;9:92
19422691