Health and human rights: epistemological status and perspectives of development.
The health and human rights movement (HHR) shows obvious signs of maturation both internally and externally. Yet there are still many questions to be addressed. These issues include the movement's epistemological status and its perspectives of development. This paper discusses critically the conditions of emergence of HHR, its identity, its dominant schools of thought, its epistemological postures and its methodological issues. Our analysis shows that: (a) the epistemological status of HHR is ambiguous; (b) its identity is uncertain in the absence of a validated definition: is it an action movement, an interdisciplinary field, a domain, an approach, a setting or a scientific discipline? (c) its main schools of thoughts are defined as "advocacists", "ethicists", "interventionists", "normativists"; (d) the movement is in the maturation process as a discipline in which "interface", "distance", "interference" and "fusion" epistemological postures represent the fundamental steps; (e) parent disciplines (health sciences and law) competences, logics and cultures introduce duality and difficulties in knowledge production, validation and diffusion; (f) there is need to re-write the history of the HHR movement by inscribing it not only into the humanitarian or public health perspectives but also into the evolution of sciences and its social, political and economical conditions of emergence. The ambiguous epistemological status of this field, the need to re-write its history, the methodological duality in its research, the question of the competence of the knowledge validation, as well as the impact of HHR practice on national and international health governance are the challenges of its future development. To meet those challenges; we call for the creation and implementation of an international research agenda, the exploration of new research topics and the evaluation of the movement's contribution to the national and global public health and human rights governance.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre Médical Universitaire, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Switzerland. Emmanuel.Kabengele@unige.ch
Emmanuel Kabengele
EK
Mpinga
Leslie
L
London
Philippe
P
Chastonay
D004989:Ethics; D014943:Global Health; D006291:Health Policy; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D011634:Public Health / Q000941:ethics; D012106:Research / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012962:Sociology, Medical
Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1922-5
11726366
Risk Anal. 2001 Jun;21(3):443-55
11572425
Med Sci (Paris). 2004 Feb;20(2):248-53
14997449
Trends Biochem Sci. 2009 May;34(5):217-23
19362484
JAMA. 1999 Aug 4;282(5):479-81
10442665
J Med Ethics. 2005 Mar;31(3):173-8
15738440
Health Hum Rights. 1996;2(1):129-139
10393634
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Winter;30(4):498-509
12561259
J Med Philos. 1994 Feb;19(1):79-102
8201292
Med Law. 2008 Mar;27(1):15-28
18592879
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Winter;30(4):522-32
12561261
BMJ. 1996 Apr 13;312(7036):924-5
8616294
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4916
19293936
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):714-9
19784452
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Mar;9(1):73-88
11657316
J Med Philos. 2006 Dec;31(6):601-28
17162730
Lancet. 2008 Dec 13;372(9655):2047-85
19097280
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):632-7
16020638
Health Hum Rights. 1994 Fall;1(1):58-80
10395711
Confl Health. 2007 Mar 01;1:1
17411453
J Public Health Policy. 2008 Apr;29(1):42-53
18368018
Health Hum Rights. 2006;9(2):5-9
17265752
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Winter;30(4):739-54
12561278