Aging and the haptic perception of 3D surface shape.
Two experiments evaluated the ability of older and younger adults to perceive the three-dimensional (3D) shape of object surfaces from active touch (haptics). The ages of the older adults ranged from 64 to 84 years, while those of the younger adults ranged from 18 to 27 years. In Experiment 1, the participants haptically judged the shape of large (20 cm diameter) surfaces with an entire hand. In contrast, in Experiment 2, the participants explored the shape of small (5 cm diameter) surfaces with a single finger. The haptic surfaces varied in shape index (Koenderink, Solid shape, 1990; Koenderink, Image and Vision Computing, 10, 557-564, 1992) from -1.0 to +1.0 in steps of 0.25. For both types of surfaces (large and small), the participants were able to judge surface shape reliably. The older participants' judgments of surface shape were just as accurate and precise as those of the younger participants. The results of the current study demonstrate that while older adults do possess reductions in tactile sensitivity and acuity, they nevertheless can effectively perceive 3D surface shape from haptic exploration.
Department of Psychology and Center for the Study of Lifespan Development, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101-1030, USA. Farley.Norman@wku.edu
J Farley
JF
Norman
Astrid M L
AM
Kappers
Amanda M
AM
Beers
A Kate
AK
Scott
Hideko F
HF
Norman
Jan J
JJ
Koenderink
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000375:Aging / Q000523:psychology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012016:Reference Values; D012684:Sensory Thresholds; D013236:Stereognosis; D055815:Young Adult
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1958 Aug;40-B(3):454-76
13575459
Psychol Aging. 2008 Mar;23(1):181-189
18361665
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Aug;44(8):974-8
8708311
Neuroreport. 1997 Dec 22;8(18):3877-81
9462459
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Jan;68(1):94-101
16617833
Neurology. 1962 Jan;12:8-19
14474916
Perception. 2003;32(1):85-96
12613788
J Gerontol. 1986 Nov;41(6):732-42
3772049
Perception. 2008;37(2):185-96
18456923
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Aug;189(4):473-83
18536910
Psychol Aging. 1995 Dec;10(4):650-8
8749592
Perception. 1994;23(12):1483-90
7792136
J Gerontol. 1978 Jul;33(4):521-7
752041
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2005 Oct;22(10):2269-80
16277296
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Feb;66(2):342-51
15129753
Perception. 2006;35(10):1383-95
17214383
Somatosens Mot Res. 1993;10(1):63-7
8484297
Cogn Psychol. 1990 Oct;22(4):421-59
2253454
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Nov 29;145(1):1-8
17069895
Neurology. 1991 Sep;41(9):1437-40
1891094
Brain. 2002 Jun;125(Pt 6):1256-64
12023314
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):198-207
18632085
Perception. 2006;35(1):9-24
16491704
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7(4):411-3
3454918
Vision Res. 2008 Jan;48(1):109-18
18076967
Somatosens Mot Res. 2007 Sep;24(3):111-4
17853056
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Jan;71(1):116-30
19304602
Psychol Aging. 1998 Jun;13(2):297-308
9640589
Percept Psychophys. 1985 Apr;37(4):299-302
4034346
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jan;69(1):23-31
17515213
J Gerontol. 1965 Apr;20:244-9
14284804
Psychol Aging. 2004 Sep;19(3):506-14
15383000
J Gerontol. 1981 Jan;36(1):34-9
7451834
J Gerontol. 1980 Mar;35(2):185-93
7410775
Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1254-61
18396307
Psychol Aging. 1992 Dec;7(4):654-60
1466834
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1063-70
15093145
Cogn Psychol. 1987 Jul;19(3):342-68
3608405
Vision Res. 2008 Oct;48(23-24):2456-65
18771680
Perception. 2009;38(9):1347-54
19911632
Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2361-6
7991127
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Jan;66(1):60-7
15095940
Science. 1980 Sep 12;209(4462):1255-6
7403884
Perception. 2000;29(11):1335-59
11219988
J Gerontol. 1992 Jan;47(1):P35-40
1730857
Vision Res. 2007 Mar;47(6):799-809
17289106
Percept Psychophys. 1994 Jul;56(1):53-61
8084732
Psychol Rev. 1962 Nov;69:477-91
13947730