Generalized two-dimensional (2D) linear system analysis metrics (GMTF, GDQE) for digital radiography systems including the effect of focal spot, magnification, scatter, and detector characteristics.
The MTF, NNPS, and DQE are standard linear system metrics used to characterize intrinsic detector performance. To evaluate total system performance for actual clinical conditions, generalized linear system metrics (GMTF, GNNPS and GDQE) that include the effect of the focal spot distribution, scattered radiation, and geometric unsharpness are more meaningful and appropriate. In this study, a two-dimensional (2D) generalized linear system analysis was carried out for a standard flat panel detector (FPD) (194-micron pixel pitch and 600-micron thick CsI) and a newly-developed, high-resolution, micro-angiographic fluoroscope (MAF) (35-micron pixel pitch and 300-micron thick CsI). Realistic clinical parameters and x-ray spectra were used. The 2D detector MTFs were calculated using the new Noise Response method and slanted edge method and 2D focal spot distribution measurements were done using a pin-hole assembly. The scatter fraction, generated for a uniform head equivalent phantom, was measured and the scatter MTF was simulated with a theoretical model. Different magnifications and scatter fractions were used to estimate the 2D GMTF, GNNPS and GDQE for both detectors. Results show spatial non-isotropy for the 2D generalized metrics which provide a quantitative description of the performance of the complete imaging system for both detectors. This generalized analysis demonstrated that the MAF and FPD have similar capabilities at lower spatial frequencies, but that the MAF has superior performance over the FPD at higher frequencies even when considering focal spot blurring and scatter. This 2D generalized performance analysis is a valuable tool to evaluate total system capabilities and to enable optimized design for specific imaging tasks.
Toshiba Stroke Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14214.
Amit
A
Jain
Andrew T
AT
Kuhls-Gilcrist
Sandesh K
SK
Gupta
Daniel R
DR
Bednarek
Stephen
S
Rudin
Med Phys. 1979 Mar-Apr;6(2):110-7
460060
Med Phys. 1974 Sep-oct;1(5):257-61
4449533
Med Phys. 1977 Sep-Oct;4(5):451-3
904598
Med Phys. 2003 Feb;30(2):254-63
12607843
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):724-35
20229882
Med Phys. 1998 Jan;25(1):102-13
9472832
Med Phys. 2005 Feb;32(2):613-26
15789608
Med Phys. 1996 Jul;23(7):1263-70
8839422
Med Phys. 2009 Aug;36(8):3806-17
19746814
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2005;5745(1):419-429
21311726
Med Phys. 1986 Mar-Apr;13(2):254-6
3702823
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 21;53(18):5107-21
18723932
Med Phys. 1995 Oct;22(10):1581-93
8551982
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2008;6918:69181I
18958294
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2004 May 6;5368:349-360
21603129