Three models of community mental health services In low-income countries.
OBJECTIVE
To compare and contrast three models of community mental health services in low-income settings.


METHODS
Primary and secondary data collected before, during, and after site visits to mental health programs in Nigeria, the Philippines, and India.


METHODS
Qualitative case study methodology.


METHODS
Data were collected through interviews and observations during site visits to the programs, as well as from reviews of documentary evidence.


RESULTS
A set of narrative topics and program indicators were used to compare and contrast three community mental health programs in low-income countries. This allowed us to identify a diversity of service delivery models, common challenges, and the strengths and weaknesses of each program. More definitive evaluations will require the establishment of data collection methods and information systems that provide data about the clinical and social outcomes of clients, as well as their use of services.


CONCLUSIONS
Community mental health programs in low-income countries face a number of challenges. Using a case study methodology developed for this purpose, it is possible to compare programs and begin to assess the effectiveness of diverse service delivery models.
Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. alex.cohen@lshtm.ac.uk.
Alex
A
Cohen
Julian
J
Eaton
Birgit
B
Radtke
Christina
C
George
Bro Victor
BV
Manuel
Mary
M
De Silva
Vikram
V
Patel
PLoS Med. 2009 Oct;6(10):e1000160
19806180
Lancet. 2007 Oct 6;370(9594):1241-52
17804059
PLoS Med. 2009 Oct;6(10):e1000165
19841735
BMJ. 2009 Sep 10;339:b3496
19744976
PLoS Med. 2009 Oct;6(10):e1000159
19806179
Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):991-1005
17804058
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):859-77
17804063
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Oct;52(1):31-7
16149978
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):878-89
17804062
PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000176
19888456
PLoS Med. 2009 Oct;6(10):e1000170
19859536
Lancet. 2007 Sep 29;370(9593):1164-74
17804061
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
18824488
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000 Apr;101(4):330-3
10782555
PLoS Med. 2005 May;2(5):e141
15916472
Lancet Neurol. 2005 Jan;4(1):21-31
15620854
JAMA. 2010 May 19;303(19):1976-7
20483977
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;185:283-90
15458987
Lancet. 2007 Sep 22;370(9592):1061-77
17804052
PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 23;7(2):e1000235
20186271
PLoS Med. 2009 Oct;6(10):e1000162
19823570
Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2008 Aug;11(3):179-81
19588039