Priming insight in groups: facilitating and inhibiting solving an ambiguously worded insight problem.
We extend research on the priming of insight by studying group problem solving. Groups of 2-4 participants tried to solve an ambiguously worded problem in the presence of a prime that reinforced the dominant but incorrect interpretation of the problem, a prime that reinforced the uncommon but correct interpretation, or no prime. The paradigm involved participants asking questions of the experimenter that could only be answered "yes" or "no." In Experiment 1, the prime was present throughout the solving period; in Experiment 2, it was removed prior to the solving period. In both experiments, the primes had their predicted effects. Patterns in the time taken to solve the problem supported the idea that groups stuck at the impasse were more or less able to restructure the problem, depending on the environmental context. Data from the questions asked and questionnaires converged with time taken to solve the problem, consistent with the view that restructuring a problem is an automatic process that produces insight. A comparison of the group data in Experiment 1 with individually tested participants' data revealed that the insight of the groups benefited from their being able to recognize lines of questions to follow, to listen to answers to questions asked, and to evaluate and reject errors or assumptions.
Department of Psychology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA 50112, USA. gibsonj@grinnell.edu
Janet M
JM
Gibson
Sara
S
Dhuse
Leah
L
Hrachovec
Lisa R
LR
Grimm
D001244:Association; D001364:Awareness; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D055815:Young Adult
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jun;36(4):822-37
18604964
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):730-7
14620371
J Exp Psychol. 1951 Feb;41(2):121-5
14824417
J Gen Psychol. 2004 Apr;131(2):118-35
15088865
Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):94-120
19210055
J Gen Psychol. 2000 Apr;127(2):165-77
10843259
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):66-73
16724770
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):716-30
9701964
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):1017-27
14516232
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):806-11
11848603
Mem Cognit. 1988 Jan;16(1):36-44
28255827
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):791-9
12109769
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):176-201
11204097
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):14-27
14736293
Psychol Rep. 1970 Feb;26(1):103-17
5452584
Cogn Process. 2007 Dec;8(4):211-32
17934769
Mem Cognit. 2004 Sep;32(6):990-1006
15673186
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):3-13
14736292