Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running.
Researchers conduct gait analyses utilizing both overground and treadmill modes of running. Previous studies comparing these modes analyzed discrete variables. Recently, techniques involving quantitative pattern analysis have assessed kinematic curve similarity in gait. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare hip, knee and rearfoot 3-D kinematics between overground and treadmill running using quantitative kinematic curve analysis. Twenty runners ran at 3.35 m/s ± 5% during treadmill and overground conditions while right lower extremity kinematics were recorded. Kinematics of the hip, knee and rearfoot at footstrike and peak were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients. Kinematic curves during stance phase were compared using the trend symmetry method within each subject. The overall average trend symmetry was high, 0.94 (1.0 is perfect symmetry) between running modes. The transverse plane and knee frontal plane exhibited lower similarity (0.86-0.90). Other than a 4.5 degree reduction in rearfoot dorsiflexion at footstrike during treadmill running, all differences were ≤1.5 degrees. 17/18 discrete variables exhibited modest correlations (>0.6) and 8/18 exhibited strong correlations (>0.8). In conclusion, overground and treadmill running kinematic curves were generally similar when averaged across subjects. Although some subjects exhibited differences in transverse plane curves, overall, treadmill running was representative of overground running for most subjects.
Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Rebecca E
RE
Fellin
Kurt
K
Manal
Irene S
IS
Davis
D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007596:Joints / Q000502:physiology; D035002:Lower Extremity / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D012420:Running / Q000502:physiology*
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Jan;27(1):98-105
7898346
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jun;35(6):1009-16
12783050
Gait Posture. 2005 Oct;22(2):138-45
16139749
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Mar;104(3):747-55
18048582
Int J Sports Med. 1998 Oct;19(7):455-61
9839841
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jun;40(6):1093-100
18460996
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Nov;13(6):646-50
20478742
Gait Posture. 2006 Dec;24(4):515-21
16427288
J Orthop Res. 1989;7(6):849-60
2795325
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 Oct;16(8):667-80
11535348
J Biomech. 1980;13(5):397-406
7400169
Gait Posture. 2007 Jun;26(1):17-24
16905322