Does the familiarity bias hypothesis explain why there is no masked priming for "NO" decisions?
Traditional "activation" views of masked priming explain the identity priming effect in terms of facilitation due to 'pre-activation' of stored representations. Norris and Kinoshita's (2008) Bayesian Reader theory of masked priming instead explains priming in terms of the evidence that the prime contributes towards the decision required to the target. In support of the Bayesian Reader account, Norris and Kinoshita showed that the absence of priming for nonwords in the lexical decision task and for targets requiring a Different decision in the same-different match task can be explained based on a single principle. Against this, Bowers (2010) argued that the absence of priming should be explained instead by a combination of sublexical priming and "familiarity bias". As evidence, Bowers cited Bodner and Masson's (1997) finding that nonword priming did emerge with targets presented in visually unfamiliar cAsE-AlTeRnAtEd format. We present evidence that this finding was due to the use of an ambiguous letter in case-alternated format; when using unambiguous letters, we consistently failed to find priming of case-alternated nonwords. We suggest that the Bayesian Reader, rather than the familiarity bias hypothesis, explains the absence of priming.
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science and Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. sachiko.kinoshita@mq.edu.au
Sachiko
S
Kinoshita
Dennis
D
Norris
D001288:Attention; D001364:Awareness; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012660:Semantics
Cogn Psychol. 2004 May;48(3):332-67
15020215
Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):327-57
16637764
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1120-36
12450337
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):141-8
18605494
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jan;63(1):194-204
19591077
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):159-82
14756592
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Mar;17(2):210-23
1827829
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):89-102
8433652
J Psycholinguist Res. 1998 Mar;27(2):203-33
9561785
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1997 Nov;97(2):183-99
9466239
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):495-513
18444751
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Feb;35(1):116-24
12723786
Mem Cognit. 2001 Mar;29(2):234-46
11352206
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Aug;137(3):434-55
18729709
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59
17958156
J Mem Lang. 2009 Oct 1;61(3):303
20161653
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):1-18
19210078
Psychol Rev. 2009 Jan;116(1):207-19
19159154