Differential effects of frozen storage on the molecular detection of bacterial taxa that inhabit the nasopharynx.
BACKGROUND
Frozen storage often precedes metagenomic analysis of biological samples; however, the freezing process can have adverse effects on microbial composition. The effect of freezing on the detection of bacteria inhabiting the infant nasopharynx, a major reservoir of bacterial pathogens, was investigated.


METHODS
16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene-based terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis of nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs from twelve Gambian infants was employed. NP swabs were analysed within hours of collection and then after 30 days of storage at -70°C.


RESULTS
There was substantial heterogeneity among subjects with respect to the effect of freezing on the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) detected. Nevertheless, the mean number of OTUs decreased after frozen storage and the relative abundance for 72% of the OTUs changed by less than 0.5% after deep frozen storage. There were differences in the odds of detection and relative abundance of OTUs matched with Moraxella sp., Haemophilus sp./Burkholderia sp., and Pseudomonas sp. A strong interaction between sex and the effect of freezing was found, whereby there was no significant change observed for males while the mean number of OTUs significantly declined among female infants following frozen storage.


CONCLUSIONS
Although frozen storage of biological samples is often necessary for archiving and logistic purposes, the potential effects on the number of taxa (composition) detected in microbial community studies are significant and should not be overlooked. Moreover, genetic factors such as sex may influence the integrity of nucleic acids during the freezing process.
Bacterial Diseases Programme, Medical Research Council Laboratories (UK), Banjul, The Gambia. mantonio@mrc.gm.
Brenda A
BA
Kwambana
Nuredin I
NI
Mohammed
David
D
Jeffries
Mike
M
Barer
Richard A
RA
Adegbola
Martin
M
Antonio
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Mar;39(3):1021-4
11230421
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;66(1):41-9
18722072
Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2007 Dec;22(6):419-28
17949346
Curr Microbiol. 2008 Jun;56(6):553-7
18301945
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan;42(1):412-4
14715793
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jun 10;94(12):6571-6
9177259
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997 Nov;21(3):213-29
9451814
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Dec;77(4):955-64
17960375
PLoS Genet. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000255
19023400
Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):811-8
17943117
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Oct;45(10):3408-10
17699645
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Dec;43(12):6152-4
16333118
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 12;105(6):2117-22
18252821
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 15;46(6):807-14
18279039
J Dairy Sci. 1989 Jul;72(7):1900-6
2674231
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Apr;75(8):2581-4
19251896
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Sep;80(3):365-80
18648804
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Dec;68(4):669-85
15590779
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1823-9
16651345
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Dec 15;45(12):1583-7
18190319
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999 Jun;18(6):517-23
10391181
Science. 2010 May 21;328(5981):994-9
20489017
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 Feb;22(2):133-40
12586977
Clin Chem. 2009 May;55(5):856-66
19264858
Can Vet J. 2002 Jan;43(1):38-42
11802668
Methods Mol Biol. 2007;368:141-51
18080468
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Apr;73(7):2284-9
17293501
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 Feb 14;219(1):87-91
12594028
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec;41(12):5551-6
14662939
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 Sep;32(3):199-206
18378430
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Aug;74(15):4889-97
18515474
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Sep;25(9):782-90
16940834
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1702-4
16461733
Vaccine. 2009 Aug 21;27 Suppl 3:C22-4
19545935
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1027-33
16461645
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Nov;15(11):1013-9
19673968