Particle formation and risk of embolization during transseptal catheterization: comparison of standard transseptal needles and a new radiofrequency transseptal needle.
OBJECTIVE
Anecdotally, the Brockenbrough transseptal needle generates plastic particles through a process of skiving (shaving off particles), when advanced through the dilator and sheath. This study was performed to assess particle creation by the Brockenbrough needle during transseptal catheterization. We explore strategies that may reduce this phenomenon, including use of the Brockenbrough stylet and a radiofrequency transseptal needle.


METHODS
In vitro simulations of transseptal catheterization were performed using Brockenbrough transseptal needles and a new radiofrequency transseptal needle. Particles that were created during advancement of transseptal needles through the sheath and dilator were collected and analyzed. Particles in the visible range of 50 μm to 4 mm were identified using a light microscope, whereas particles in the sub-visible, yet clinically relevant range of 10 to 50 μm, were counted using a light obscuration method.


RESULTS
All simulated procedures using the Brockenbrough transseptal needles, with or without a stylet, generated visible particles. Simulated procedures with the radiofrequency transseptal needle generated no visible particles. A greater number of sub-visible particles were generated with the standard Brockenbrough transseptal needle (BKR-1) without stylet compared with the standard Brockenbrough needle (BRK-1) with stylet, the Brockenbrough extra sharp (BRK-1XS) needle with or without stylet, and the radiofrequency needle (NRG C1).


CONCLUSIONS
Clinically relevant particles, both visible and sub-visible, with the potential for causing embolic complications, are generated by the BRK-1 needle without stylet. Use of a stylet in the BRK-1 needle, or the BRK-1XS needle with or without stylet, appears to reduce the size and amount of particles created. The NRG C1 needle appears to eliminate visible particles and is comparable to the BRK-1 with stylet and the BRK-1XS with or without stylet in generation of sub-visible particles. Important steps can be taken to minimize the creation of particles during the advancement of the BRK-1 through the transseptal sheath and dilator.
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology Program UCSD Medical Center, 4169 Front St., San Diego, CA 92103-8649, USA. gfeld@ucsd.edu
Gregory K
GK
Feld
Jay
J
Tiongson
Ganiyu
G
Oshodi
D017115:Catheter Ablation / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation*; D057785:Catheters / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004617:Embolism / Q000209:etiology*; D004867:Equipment Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D006331:Heart Diseases / Q000209:etiology*; D006346:Heart Septum / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D009339:Needles / Q000009:adverse effects*
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2008 Feb 01;8(1):72-4
18270605
Circulation. 1962 Jan;25:15-21
13873261
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Apr;21(4):423-7
19925604
Heart. 2003 Sep;89(9):990-2
12923006
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jun 3;51(22):2107-15
18510956
Heart. 2009 Jan;95(1):85-92
19047447
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;16(6):561-5
15946349
Heart Lung Circ. 2010 Jul;19(7):438-9
19656723
Circulation. 2003 Aug 5;108(5):548-53
12874191
Circulation. 2010 Oct 26;122(17):1667-73
20937975
Circulation. 2002 Mar 19;105(11):1285-90
11901037