Comparing skin staples to sutures.
In a prospective randomized study, 52 lacerations requiring closure in the emergency department were either stapled or sutured. Six participating emergency physicians closed the wounds and recorded data about the laceration and the treatment provided. Patients visited their own family physicians for removal of the closures. Forty family physicians removed closures from 44 lacerations and reported follow-up data on discomfort levels, ease of closure removal, and cosmetic results. Lacerations were closed 2.7 times faster by the staple method (p<0.001), and there were no clinically significant differences between the two methods with respect to discomfort, infection rates, cosmetic result, or ease of removal. The staple device we used was more expensive than sutures. We concluded that the staple method of closure is safe, comfortable, and effective in the emergency department setting, and that the method's speed offsets its greater expense in some circumstances.
M
M
Shuster
Thorax. 1984 Dec;39(12):942-5
6096982
Am J Surg. 1976 Jul;132(1):136-7
952330
Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(7):501-2
7048825
Ann Emerg Med. 1981 Dec;10(12):631-5
7305094
Arch Surg. 1977 Jul;112(7):855-6
327977
S Afr Med J. 1982 Sep 4;62(11):371-2
7112304
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1986 Jan;68(1):2-4
3947010
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985 Sep;67(5):318-20
3901864
J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1982 Aug;8(8):680-90
6749935
J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1983 Apr;73(4):212-3
6841896
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1985 Feb;30(1):54-6
3989764
Br J Hosp Med. 1985 Jun;33(6):325-30
3893586
Arch Surg. 1984 Jul;119(7):821-2
6375633
Surgery. 1985 Jul;98(1):20-4
3892745
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982 Mar;6(3):305-9
7068959