Planning and articulation in incremental word production: syllable-frequency effects in English.
We investigated the role of syllables during speech planning in English by measuring syllable-frequency effects. So far, syllable-frequency effects in English have not been reported. English has poorly defined syllable boundaries, and thus the syllable might not function as a prominent unit in English speech production. Speakers produced either monosyllabic (Experiment 1) or disyllabic (Experiment 2-4) pseudowords as quickly as possible in response to symbolic cues. Monosyllabic targets consisted of either high- or low-frequency syllables, whereas disyllabic items contained either a 1st or 2nd syllable that was frequency-manipulated. Significant syllable-frequency effects were found in all experiments. Whereas previous findings for disyllables in Dutch and Spanish-languages with relatively clear syllable boundaries-showed effects of a frequency manipulation on 1st but not 2nd syllables, in our study English speakers were sensitive to the frequency of both syllables. We interpret this sensitivity as an indication that the production of English has more extensive planning scopes at the interface of phonetic encoding and articulation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Paseo Mikeletegi 69, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain. j.cholin@bcbl.eu
Joana
J
Cholin
Gary S
GS
Dell
Willem J M
WJ
Levelt
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D001245:Association Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010700:Phonetics; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D013068:Speech Production Measurement; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D014495:Universities; D014825:Vocabulary