Predicting myocardial functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction: relationship between myocardial strain and coronary flow reserve.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between myocardial strain and coronary flow reserve (CFR) in the prediction of myocardial functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).


METHODS
Consecutive patients with anterior ST elevation AMI were analyzed. Left ventricular (LV) strain, determined by 2-dimensional speckle tracking imaging and CFR, determined by intracoronary flow measurement, were obtained on the same day, 3-5 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. A-strain was defined as the mean systolic longitudinal strain of 11 LV segments (out of 18) assumed to be supplied by the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Functional recovery was defined as improved wall motion >1 grade seen in at least 2 contiguous dysfunctional segments by echocardiography at the 6-month follow-up.


RESULTS
Of 20 patients, 8 patients had preserved CFR (>2.0) and 12 patients had impaired CFR (≤2.0). There were no differences between the 2 CFR groups in LV ejection fractions and wall motion score indices in the LAD territory. However, A-strain was greater in patients with preserved CFR than in patients with impaired CFR (-6.4±2.0% vs. -4.6±1.4%, p=0.03). A-strain and CFR correlated well with each other (r=-0.49, p=0.03). Ten of 20 patients showed functional recovery at 6 months. Of clinical and echocardiographic parameters, A-strain was the only predictor of recovery (odds ratio 2.02, 95% confidence interval=1.03-3.97, p=0.04). For predicting recovery, the sensitivity and specificity were 80.0% and 80.0%, respectively, for CFR (cutoff=1.60), and 60.0% and 90.0%, respectively, for A-strain (cutoff=-6.13%).


CONCLUSIONS
Myocardial strain correlates well with the extent of microvascular integrity and can be used as a noninvasive method for predicting recovery after AMI.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong-Mi
SM
Park
Soon-Jun
SJ
Hong
Yong-Hyun
YH
Kim
Chul-Min
CM
Ahn
Do-Sun
DS
Lim
Wan-Joo
WJ
Shim
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
2868172
Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Nov;114(5):649-62
7304595
Am Heart J. 1996 Mar;131(3):466-71
8604625
Circulation. 1990 Apr;81(4):1161-72
2138525
Circulation. 2000 Jun 13;101(23):2734-41
10851212
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Apr 15;51(15):1473-81
18402903
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(5):765-70
17891613
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989 Sep-Oct;2(5):358-67
2698218
Circulation. 1994 Mar;89(3):1109-17
8124797
Circulation. 1992 May;85(5):1899-911
1572046
Circulation. 1998 Sep 8;98(10):1006-14
9737521
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov 15;32(6):1756-64
9822106
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 12;51(6):651-9
18261685
Circulation. 1996 Jun 1;93(11):1993-9
8640973
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 Nov;51(3):281-6
11066106
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007 Mar;20(3):234-43
17336748
Am Heart J. 1995 Aug;130(2):239-43
7631601
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jan 1;57(1):177-8
3510523
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Mar;21(3):262-7
17904803
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Nov 21;48(10):2026-33
17112992
Circulation. 1994 Jan;89(1):68-75
8281697
Circulation. 2006 Jul 25;114(4):289-97
16847154
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 Jan;19(1):34-9
16423667
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3):959-69
10987628
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Apr 24;49(16):1715-21
17448374