Applying a regional community concept to forest birds of eastern North America.
The regional community concept embraces the idea that species interactions across large areas shape both the geographic/ecological distributions and the local abundances of populations. Within this framework, I analyzed the distribution and abundance of 79 species of land birds across 142 ca. 10-ha census plots from standardized breeding bird censuses in deciduous and mixed forests of eastern North America. To characterize the regional ecological space, plots were ordinated on the basis of species abundances. Within the regional community defined by these synthetic axes, the distribution and abundance of individual species did not appear to be shaped by competition or to reflect the adaptations of individuals: (i) local abundance and population extent across the ordination axes were unrelated, (ii) pairwise correlation coefficients of species abundances were centered on 0, (iii) average species distribution and abundance were independent of the number of close relatives, and (iv) distribution and abundance exhibited no evolutionary (phylogenetic) conservatism. To explain these seemingly random patterns, I speculate that species are approximately evenly matched competitors over much of the region and that their distributions and relative abundances are determined by the labile coevolutionary outcomes of interactions with specialized pathogens. Thus, despite the appearance that random processes determine patterns in the distribution and abundance of populations in the regional community, it is plausible that species-specific deterministic interactions are responsible. Although competition is a dominant force in ecological communities, variation in the distribution and abundance of individual species might instead reflect the outcome of interactions with specialized antagonists, including pathogens.
Department of Biology, University of Missouri, St Louis, MO 63121, USA. ricklefs@umsl.edu
Robert E
RE
Ricklefs
D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D008954:Models, Biological; D009656:North America; D014197:Trees
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Jul;26(7):340-8
21561679
Ecology. 2006 Jun;87(6):1424-31
16869416
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106 Suppl 2:19659-65
19903876
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 26;107(4):1265-72
20080597
Monogr Popul Biol. 1974;7(0):1-318
4835705
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S14-28
16922299
Ecol Lett. 2007 Dec;10(12):1115-23
17850335
Science. 2010 Feb 26;327(5969):1129-32
20185724
Ecol Lett. 2006 Apr;9(4):485-98
16623733
Oecologia. 1980 Jan;45(3):385-389
28309569
Science. 2001 May 11;292(5519):1109-12
11352066
J Theor Biol. 1981 May 21;90(2):213-39
7311579
Monogr Popul Biol. 1982;17:1-296
7162524
Am Nat. 2003 Apr;161(4):553-66
12776884
Am Nat. 2008 Jul;172(1):88-101
18505384
Am Nat. 2008 Dec;172(6):741-50
18954264
Syst Biol. 2009 Dec;58(6):629-40
20525614
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Oct;21(10):531-3
16901580
Am Nat. 2000 Apr;155(4):419-434
10753072
Nature. 2004 Jul 15;430(6997):338-41
15254535
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 7;271(1546):1363-70
15306334
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Sep 22;267(1455):1843-50
11052534
Science. 2007 Mar 16;315(5818):1574-6
17363673
Oecologia. 2000 Feb;122(3):410-420
28308292
Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Oct 7;266(1432):1939-45
10584336