Effects of vitamin D supplementation on bone density in healthy children: systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children and adolescents and if effects vary with factors such as vitamin D dose and vitamin D status.


METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis.


METHODS
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline (1966 to present), Embase (1980 to present), CINAHL (1982 to present), AMED (1985 to present), and ISI Web of Science (1945 to present), last updated on 9 August 2009, and hand searching of conference abstracts from key journals. Study selection Placebo controlled randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation for at least three months in healthy children and adolescents (aged 1 month to <20 years) with bone density outcomes. Two authors independently assessed references for inclusion and study quality and extracted data.


RESULTS
Standardised mean differences of the percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density of the forearm, hip, and lumbar spine and total body bone mineral content in treatment and control groups. Subgroup analyses were carried out by sex, pubertal stage, dose of vitamin D, and baseline serum vitamin D concentration. Compliance and allocation concealment were also considered as possible sources of heterogeneity.


RESULTS
From 1653 potential references, six studies, totalling 343 participants receiving placebo and 541 receiving vitamin D, contributed data to meta-analyses. Vitamin D supplementation had no statistically significant effects on total body bone mineral content or on bone mineral density of the hip or forearm. There was a trend to a small effect on lumbar spine bone mineral density (standardised mean difference 0.15, 95% confidence interval -0.01 to 0.31; P=0.07). Effects were similar in studies of participants with high compared with low serum vitamin D levels, although there was a trend towards a larger effect with low vitamin D for total body bone mineral content (P=0.09 for difference). In studies with low serum vitamin D, significant effects on total body bone mineral content and lumbar spine bone mineral density were roughly equivalent to a 2.6% and 1.7% percentage point greater change from baseline in the supplemented group.


CONCLUSIONS
It is unlikely that vitamin D supplements are beneficial in children and adolescents with normal vitamin D levels. The planned subgroup analyses by baseline serum vitamin D level suggest that vitamin D supplementation of deficient children and adolescents could result in clinically useful improvements, particularly in lumbar spine bone mineral density and total body bone mineral content, but this requires confirmation.
Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia. tania.winzenberg@utas.edu.au
Tania
T
Winzenberg
Sandi
S
Powell
Kelly Anne
KA
Shaw
Graeme
G
Jones
D000293:Adolescent; D015982:Bias; D015519:Bone Density / Q000187:drug effects*; D050071:Bone Density Conservation Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D002648:Child; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D014807:Vitamin D / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects
D050071:Bone Density Conservation Agents; D014807:Vitamin D
Eur J Radiol. 1998 Jan;26(2):177-82
9518226
J Nutr. 2006 Apr;136(4):1130-4
16549494
J Nutr. 2005 Nov;135(11):2602-8
16251618
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Dec;83(12):4274-9
9851763
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Aug;(158):1-235
18088161
J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Jun;21(6):836-44
16753014
Br J Nutr. 2004 Jul;92(1):159-68
15230999
Arch Pediatr. 2000 Feb;7(2):148-53
10701059
Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-33
16983459
Bone. 1996 Jul;19(1):9-12
8830981
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Feb;91(2):405-12
16278262
J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Jul;31(7):1473-80
26841085
J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Jan;13(1):143-8
9443800
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD005119
16625624
BMJ. 1991 Oct 19;303(6808):961-4
1954420
BMJ. 2006 Oct 14;333(7572):775
16980314
Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 Dec;60(6):837-42
7985621
Br J Nutr. 2005 Dec;94(6):1038-9
16351784
Am J Dis Child. 1992 Nov;146(11):1302-5
1415066
Nutrition. 2000 Jul-Aug;16(7-8):564-6
10906557
J Pediatr. 2001 Oct;139(4):509-15
11598596
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1254-9
8634613
Arch Dis Child. 2006 Jul;91(7):569-72
16174640
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Jun;158(6):531-7
15184215
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;83(3):714-21
16522922
Med J Aust. 2006 Sep 4;185(5):268-72
16948623
J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Jul;21(7):1126-35
16813534
Acta Paediatr Scand. 1988 Jan;77(1):89-93
3285637
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999 Oct;53(10):824-9
10556991
Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Sep;56(3):579-86
1503072
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 19;357(3):266-81
17634462
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Apr;88(4):1486-91
12679427
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Dec;84(12):4541-4
10599715
Proc Nutr Soc. 2003 Nov;62(4):851-8
15018485
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(10):875-9
11716192
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007 Mar;103(3-5):584-6
17298881
Lancet. 1993 Jan 9;341(8837):72-5
8093403
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Aug;74(2):206-10
11470722
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Nov;82(5):1115-26; quiz 1147-8
16280447
J Pediatr. 1985 Dec;107(6):928-31
4067751
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Dec;76(6):1446-53
12450915
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(9):1382-9
16832715
J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Mar;22(3):465-75
17144789
Bone. 2002 May;30(5):771-7
11996918
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999 Sep;53(9):746-51
10509773
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Sep;78(3):485-92
12936933
NIH Consens Statement. 2000 Mar 27-29;17(1):1-45
11525451
BJOG. 2009 Nov;116(12):1678-82
19681853
Br J Nutr. 2008 Jul;100(1):197-207
18208636
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 06;(10):CD006944
20927753
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Jun;16(6):636-41
15448989
J Trop Pediatr. 1994 Jun;40(3):162-5
8078115
Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):E53
11335774