Variation in the gut microbiota of laboratory mice is related to both genetic and environmental factors.
During recent years, the composition of the gut microbiota (GM) has received increasing attention as a factor in the development of experimental inflammatory disease in animal models. Because increased variation in the GM might lead to increased variation in disease parameters, determining and reducing GM variation between laboratory animals may provide more consistent models. Both genetic and environmental aspects influence the composition of the GM and may vary between laboratory animal breeding centers and within an individual breeding center. This study investigated the variation in cecal microbiota in 8-wk-old NMRI and C57BL/6 mice by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to profile PCR-derived amplicons from bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Comparison of the cecal microbiotas revealed that the similarity index of the inbred C57BL/6Sca strain was 10% higher than that of the outbred Sca:NMRI stock. Comparing C57BL/6 mice from 2 vendors revealed significant differences in the microbial profile, whereas the profiles of C57BL/6Sca mice raised in separate rooms within the same breeding center were not significantly different. Furthermore, housing in individually ventilated cages did not lead to intercage variation. These results show that denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis is a simple tool that can be used to characterize the gut microbiota of mice. Including such characterizations in future quality-control programs may increase the reproducibility of mouse studies.
Centre for Applied Laboratory Animal Research, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Department of Food Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Majbritt Ravn
MR
Hufeldt
Dennis S
DS
Nielsen
Finn Kvist
FK
Vogensen
Tore
T
Midtvedt
Axel Kornerup
AK
Hansen
D000818:Animals; D002432:Cecum / Q000382:microbiology*; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D058645:Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis; D006799:Housing, Animal; D051379:Mice / Q000235:genetics / Q000382:microbiology*; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL; D025341:Principal Component Analysis
Science. 2001 May 11;292(5519):1115-8
11352068
BMC Microbiol. 2006 Nov 30;6:98
17137493
Cell. 2006 Oct 20;127(2):423-33
17055441
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1998 Jan;73(1):127-41
9602286
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Nov;65(11):4799-807
10543789
Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Feb 15;98(3):281-9
15698689
Gut. 2009 Aug;58(8):1091-103
19240062
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 2;102(31):11070-5
16033867
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 Apr;40 Suppl 1:S30-1
15805841
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2005 Jul;88(1):67-74
15928978
Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1991 Feb;38(1):61-72
1905868
Diabetes. 2008 Oct;57(10):2555-62
18820210
Jikken Dobutsu. 1990 Apr;39(2):263-7
2141820
Infect Immun. 2001 Apr;69(4):2372-7
11254595
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004 Jun 1;235(1):139-46
15158273
Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1027-31
17183312
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2001 Oct;80(1):35-42
11761365
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Jan 26;82(1):59-70
12505460
J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Jul;66(1):87-95
16289391
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 05;5(1):e8584
20052418
Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;10(6):1571-81
18331337
Z Versuchstierkd. 1990;33(1):57-61
2138839
Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar;10(3):709-15
18036181
Exp Anim. 2008 Oct;57(5):489-93
18946187
Scand J Immunol. 2008 Jun;67(6):553-9
18476878
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):3171-8
15933018
Br J Nutr. 2008 Jun;99(6):1174-7
18096093
Immunol Lett. 2004 May 15;93(2-3):97-108
15158604
Exp Anim. 2008 Apr;57(2):95-9
18421171
Mutat Res. 2007 Sep 1;622(1-2):58-69
17612575
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003 May 1;44(1):131-6
19719658
Lab Anim. 1991 Jul;25(3):207-11
1921315
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1983 Jun;49(2):119-24
6684413
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2006 May-Jun;22(3):220-5
16355418
Lab Anim. 2002 Jan;36(1):20-42
11831737
Lab Anim. 1985 Jan;19(1):7-15
4038760