Precision of sensing cell length via concentration gradients.
Unicellular organisms are typically found to have a characteristic cell size. To achieve a homeostatic distribution of cell sizes over many generations requires that cell length is actively sensed and regulated. However, the mechanisms by which cell size is controlled remain poorly understood. Recent experiments in fission yeast have shown that cell length is controlled in part by polar gradients of the protein Pom1 together with localized measurement of concentration at midcell. Dilution as the cell grows leads to a reduction in the midcell protein concentration, which lifts a block on mitosis. Here we analyze the precision of this mechanism for length sensing in the presence of inevitable intrinsic noise in the processes leading to formation and measurement of this gradient. We find that the use of concentration gradients allows for more robust length sensing than a comparable spatially uniform system, and allows for reliable length determination even if the average protein concentration throughout the cell remains constant as the cell grows. Optimal values for the gradient decay length and receptor dissociation constant emerge from maximizing sensitivity while minimizing the impact of density fluctuations.
FOM Institute AMOLF, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.tostevin@amolf.nl
Filipe
F
Tostevin
D002453:Cell Cycle; D048429:Cell Size; D008954:Models, Biological; D056004:Molecular Dynamics Simulation; D011494:Protein Kinases / Q000378:metabolism*; D053038:Quorum Sensing / Q000502:physiology*; D012568:Schizosaccharomyces / Q000378:metabolism*; D029702:Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins
D029702:Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins; D011494:Protein Kinases; C112212:Pom1 protein, S pombe
J Cell Biol. 2009 Feb 23;184(4):473-9
19221192
J Cell Sci. 1977 Apr;24:51-67
893551
J Theor Biol. 1969 Oct;25(1):1-47
4390734
Biophys J. 1977 Nov;20(2):193-219
911982
Development. 2004 Feb;131(4):703-12
14757636
J Cell Sci. 2006 Nov 15;119(Pt 22):4710-8
17077120
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Aug 11;97(6):068102
17026206
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Apr;77(4 Pt 1):041917
18517666
Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Jul 23;105(4):048104
20867888
Curr Biol. 2006 Dec 19;16(24):2480-7
17140794
Cell. 2005 Nov 4;123(3):449-61
16269336
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Dec 18;103(25):258101
20366291
Nature. 2009 Jun 11;459(7248):857-60
19474789
J Cell Sci. 1996 Dec;109 ( Pt 12):2947-57
9013342
Trends Cell Biol. 2006 Mar;16(3):125-34
16478663
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Oct;80(4 Pt 1):041902
19905337
Genes Dev. 1998 Nov 1;12(21):3419-30
9808628
Science. 2005 Oct 14;310(5746):310-4
16224022
Development. 2006 Feb;133(3):385-94
16410409
Mol Microbiol. 2001 Aug;41(4):861-72
11532149
Mol Microbiol. 1999 Oct;34(1):82-90
10540287
Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):1132-6
18463638
Curr Biol. 2004 Dec 14;14(23):R1014-27
15589139
Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Nov;9(11):1319-26
17952059
Cell. 2006 Jul 14;126(1):147-62
16839883
Nature. 2008 Apr 17;452(7189):882-6
18354396
Exp Cell Res. 1977 Jul;107(2):365-75
872890
Nature. 2009 Jun 11;459(7248):852-6
19474792
Nat Genet. 2004 Aug;36(8):809-17
15195092
Curr Biol. 2006 Sep 5;16(17):1685-93
16950104
Genes Dev. 1998 May 1;12(9):1356-70
9573052
Exp Cell Res. 1977 Jul;107(2):377-86
872891
EMBO J. 2001 Mar 1;20(5):1064-73
11230130
Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Nov;9(11):1263-72
17952063
Cell. 2008 May 16;133(4):666-80
18485874
FEBS Lett. 1999 Sep 3;457(3):452-4
10471827
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):4971-6
10220403
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Apr 27;3(4):e78
17465676
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 6;106(1):121-6
19116281
Mol Microbiol. 1999 Jul;33(1):84-96
10411726
Cell Mol Bioeng. 2008 Mar 1;1(1):84-92
21152415