Compensatory development and costs of plasticity: larval responses to desiccated conspecifics.
Understanding constraints on phenotypic plasticity is central to explaining its evolution and the evolution of phenotypes in general, yet there is an ongoing debate on the classification and relationships among types of constraints. Since plasticity is often a developmental process, studies that consider the ontogeny of traits and their developmental mechanisms are beneficial. We manipulated the timing and reliability of cues perceived by fire salamander larvae for the future desiccation of their ephemeral pools to determine whether flexibility in developmental rates is constrained to early ontogeny. We hypothesized that higher rates of development, and particularly compensation for contradictory cues, would incur greater endogenous costs. We found that larvae respond early in ontogeny to dried conspecifics as a cue for future desiccation, but can fully compensate for this response in case more reliable but contradictory cues are later perceived. Patterns of mortality suggested that endogenous costs may depend on instantaneous rates of development, and revealed asymmetrical costs of compensatory development between false positive and false negative early information. Based on the results, we suggest a simple model of costs of development that implies a tradeoff between production costs of plasticity and phenotype-environment mismatch costs, which may potentially underlie the phenomenon of ontogenetic windows constraining plasticity.
Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology and the Institute of Evolution, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. asaffield@yahoo.com
Asaf
A
Sadeh
Noa
N
Truskanov
Marc
M
Mangel
Leon
L
Blaustein
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D003890:Desiccation; D004777:Environment; D007814:Larva / Q000254:growth & development; D010641:Phenotype; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D015996:Survival Rate; D014562:Caudata / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development*
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 22;277(1681):503-11
19846457
Mol Ecol. 2000 Apr;9(4):397-410
10736043
Oecologia. 2000 Aug;124(3):343-350
28308771
PLoS One. 2010 May 26;5(5):e10824
20520811
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Aug 7;275(1644):1703-8
18445563
Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):998-1007
20545728
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Mar;20(3):129-35
16701356
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 May 1;16(5):254-260
11301155
Am Nat. 2002 Apr;159(4):338-50
18707419
Oecologia. 2010 Apr;162(4):987-94
19882173
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Feb 1;13(2):77-81
21238209
Ecol Lett. 2009 Nov;12(11):1158-64
19708967
Evolution. 2006 Jan;60(1):142-56
16568639
Am Nat. 2005 Dec;166(6):E155-76
16475079
Ecology. 2007 Mar;88(3):693-705
17503597
Evolution. 2001 Sep;55(9):1863-72
11681741
Oecologia. 2005 Nov;146(1):36-42
16133198
Ecol Lett. 2009 Jan;12(1):75-92
19016828
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1133:44-66
18559815
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Nov;22(11):575-82
18029053
Science. 1973 Dec 28;182(4119):1305-14
17733097