A general scenario of Hox gene inventory variation among major sarcopterygian lineages.
BACKGROUND
Hox genes are known to play a key role in shaping the body plan of metazoans. Evolutionary dynamics of these genes is therefore essential in explaining patterns of evolutionary diversity. Among extant sarcopterygians comprising both lobe-finned fishes and tetrapods, our knowledge of the Hox genes and clusters has largely been restricted in several model organisms such as frogs, birds and mammals. Some evolutionary gaps still exist, especially for those groups with derived body morphology or occupying key positions on the tree of life, hindering our understanding of how Hox gene inventory varied along the sarcopterygian lineage.


RESULTS
We determined the Hox gene inventory for six sarcopterygian groups: lungfishes, caecilians, salamanders, snakes, turtles and crocodiles by comprehensive PCR survey and genome walking. Variable Hox genes in each of the six sarcopterygian group representatives, compared to the human Hox gene inventory, were further validated for their presence/absence by PCR survey in a number of related species representing a broad evolutionary coverage of the group. Turtles, crocodiles, birds and placental mammals possess the same 39 Hox genes. HoxD12 is absent in snakes, amphibians and probably lungfishes. HoxB13 is lost in frogs and caecilians. Lobe-finned fishes, amphibians and squamate reptiles possess HoxC3. HoxC1 is only present in caecilians and lobe-finned fishes. Similar to coelacanths, lungfishes also possess HoxA14, which is only found in lobe-finned fishes to date. Our Hox gene variation data favor the lungfish-tetrapod, turtle-archosaur and frog-salamander relationships and imply that the loss of HoxD12 is not directly related to digit reduction.


CONCLUSIONS
Our newly determined Hox inventory data provide a more complete scenario for evolutionary dynamics of Hox genes along the sarcopterygian lineage. Limbless, worm-like caecilians and snakes possess similar Hox gene inventories to animals with less derived body morphology, suggesting changes to their body morphology are likely due to other modifications rather than changes to Hox gene numbers. Furthermore, our results provide basis for future sequencing of the entire Hox clusters of these animals.
State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Key Laboratory of Gene Engineering of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
Dan
D
Liang
Riga
R
Wu
Jie
J
Geng
Chaolin
C
Wang
Peng
P
Zhang
D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000818:Animals; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D014644:Genetic Variation; D018398:Homeodomain Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D010802:Phylogeny; D016415:Sequence Alignment; D014714:Vertebrates / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics*
D018398:Homeodomain Proteins
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19;98(13):7380-3
11390961
Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):714-9
17554307
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3622-7
20139301
Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):431-41
8106170
Nature. 2010 Mar 4;464(7285):99-103
20203609
Genome Res. 2009 Apr;19(4):602-10
19228589
Trends Genet. 2005 Aug;21(8):421-4
15967537
Science. 1999 Feb 12;283(5404):998-1001
9974396
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2003 Oct 15;299(1):18-25
14508813
Nature. 2004 Oct 21;431(7011):946-57
15496914
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;117(1-4):110-9
17675851
Syst Biol. 2005 Jun;54(3):391-400
16012106
Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):543-63
17654361
Gene. 2006 Mar 29;370:75-82
16472944
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Nov;29(2):289-97
13678684
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Apr 23;9:82
19389226
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 4;100(3):1084-8
12547909
Nature. 2001 Feb 22;409(6823):1102-9
11234024
Dev Biol. 2009 Aug 1;332(1):82-9
19409887
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 15;97(4):1655-60
10677514
Dev Dyn. 2005 Jun;233(2):382-9
15844201
Genome Res. 2008 Jul;18(7):1100-11
18562680
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Sep;32(3):686-94
15288047
J Mol Evol. 2005 Nov;61(5):636-49
16205980
J Exp Zool. 1999 Aug 15;285(2):140-5
10440725
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 24;95(24):14226-31
9826682
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 16;104(3):887-92
17213318
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Apr;22(4):810-3
15625185
Nature. 1999 Jun 3;399(6735):474-9
10365960
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Feb;38(2):449-58
16198128
Development. 1996 Apr;122(4):1175-85
8620844
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9
17488738
Science. 2002 Aug 23;297(5585):1301-10
12142439
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2007 May 15;308(3):250-8
17171698
Gene. 2000 Dec 23;259(1-2):139-48
11163971
Science. 2003 Jul 18;301(5631):331-3
12869751
J Exp Zool. 2002 Apr 15;294(1):47-62
11932948
Cladistics. 1988 Jun;4(2):105-209
34949076
Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673-80
7984417
Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53(5-6):765-73
19557682
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 22;106(38):16327-32
19805301
BMC Genomics. 2007 Sep 10;8:317
17845724
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Dec;27(12):2829-38
20616144