Distinct ECM mechanosensing pathways regulate microtubule dynamics to control endothelial cell branching morphogenesis.
During angiogenesis, cytoskeletal dynamics that mediate endothelial cell branching morphogenesis during vascular guidance are thought to be regulated by physical attributes of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in a process termed mechanosensing. Here, we tested the involvement of microtubules in linking mechanosensing to endothelial cell branching morphogenesis. We used a recently developed microtubule plus end-tracking program to show that specific parameters of microtubule assembly dynamics, growth speed and growth persistence, are globally and regionally modified by, and contribute to, ECM mechanosensing. We demonstrated that engagement of compliant two-dimensional or three-dimensional ECMs induces local differences in microtubule growth speed that require myosin II contractility. Finally, we found that microtubule growth persistence is modulated by myosin II-mediated compliance mechanosensing when cells are cultured on two-dimensional ECMs, whereas three-dimensional ECM engagement makes microtubule growth persistence insensitive to changes in ECM compliance. Thus, compliance and dimensionality ECM mechanosensing pathways independently regulate specific and distinct microtubule dynamics parameters in endothelial cells to guide branching morphogenesis in physically complex ECMs.
Cell Biology and Physiology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Kenneth A
KA
Myers
Kathryn T
KT
Applegate
Gaudenz
G
Danuser
Robert S
RS
Fischer
Clare M
CM
Waterman
D002465:Cell Movement; D048430:Cell Shape / Q000502:physiology*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D042783:Endothelial Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism; D005109:Extracellular Matrix / Q000378:metabolism*; D006801:Humans; D040542:Mechanotransduction, Cellular; D008870:Microtubules / Q000378:metabolism*; D024462:Myosin Type II / Q000378:metabolism
D024462:Myosin Type II
Science. 2004 Feb 6;303(5659):836-9
14764879
J Cell Biol. 2003 Jun 23;161(6):1163-77
12810700
J Neurosci. 2003 Oct 22;23(29):9479-90
14573527
Nat Methods. 2010 Sep;7(9):761-8
20729842
Science. 2003 Mar 14;299(5613):1743-7
12637748
Circ Res. 2002 Nov 15;91(10):877-87
12433832
Biophys J. 2000 Jul;79(1):144-52
10866943
Dev Dyn. 2004 Nov;231(3):503-9
15376331
J Cell Biol. 2005 Jun 20;169(6):929-39
15955847
J Cell Biol. 2008 Dec 15;183(6):999-1005
19075110
J Cell Biol. 2009 Feb 23;184(4):481-90
19221195
Biophys J. 2005 Dec;89(6):L52-4
16214867
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005 Oct;17(5):524-32
16112853
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 28;101(52):18024-9
15601776
Biophys J. 2006 Mar 15;90(6):2213-20
16387786
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Aug;10(8):538-49
19603038
Science. 2005 Nov 18;310(5751):1139-43
16293750
Nat Cell Biol. 2003 Jul;5(7):599-609
12833063
Neuroreport. 2002 Dec 20;13(18):2411-5
12499839
Brain Res. 2007 Oct 24;1176:1-10
17888886
Biochemistry. 2005 Jan 18;44(2):584-8
15641783
Trends Cell Biol. 2004 Mar;14(3):111-4
15055199
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007 Nov 10;59(13):1299-305
17825456
J Cell Sci. 2002 Jun 1;115(Pt 11):2283-91
12006613
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105(32):11305-10
18685096
Curr Biol. 2009 Feb 10;19(3):260-5
19185493
J Cell Sci. 2002 Sep 1;115(Pt 17):3527-39
12154083
Nature. 2009 Feb 26;457(7233):1103-8
19242469
J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 15;21(24):9757-69
11739584
Science. 2002 Dec 6;298(5600):1959-64
12471249
EXS. 2005;(94):3-15
15617467
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Oct;15(5):521-6
16143510
J Neurobiol. 2004 Jan;58(1):18-33
14598367
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 27;104(13):5425-30
17369366
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):13661-5
9391082
Dev Neurobiol. 2009 Apr;69(5):279-98
19224562
Biochem Soc Trans. 2009 Oct;37(Pt 5):1007-13
19754441
Neuron. 2003 Oct 9;40(2):209-27
14556705
Nat Methods. 2008 Aug;5(8):695-702
18641657
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002 Oct;14(5):633-9
12231360