A comparison of explicitly unpaired treatment and extinction: recovery of sign-tracking within a context renewal design.
The present experiment compared the effectiveness of explicitly unpaired treatment and extinction in preventing the recovery of sign-tracking within a context renewal design. Three groups of rats were first trained on a sign-tracking procedure in Context A where insertions of a retractable lever were paired with food. In a second phase, the sign-tracking response was eliminated. One group received standard extinction of the CS in Context B, while another group received explicitly unpaired treatment in Context B where food was presented only during inter-trial intervals (and not paired with the lever). A third group received this explicitly unpaired treatment in Context A. After the sign-tracking response was eliminated, all groups received a test session in Context A where the lever was presented alone and no food was delivered at any time. Significantly more responding occurred in the group that received explicitly unpaired treatment in Context B than in either of the other groups. This demonstrates that there are situations where explicitly unpaired treatment is less effective than extinction in preventing the reappearance of previously eliminated responding.
Psychology Department, American University, United States. Dk0085a@american.edu
David N
DN
Kearns
Stanley J
SJ
Weiss
D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D005108:Extinction, Psychological; D008297:Male; D051381:Rats; D020318:Rats, Long-Evans; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D012153:Retention, Psychology
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Apr;27(2):99-114
11296492
Behav Processes. 2007 Jan 10;74(1):1-12
17045760
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jul;36(3):343-53
20658865
Behav Processes. 2007 Jul;75(3):307-11
17507179
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Apr;7(2):175-90
7241053
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Oct;77(10):6251-3
6934550
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Sep;80(2):217-33
14674730
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):451-62
16811960
Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Jun;17(4):369-74
16914956