Tracking planets and moons: mechanisms of object tracking revealed with a new paradigm.
People can attend to and track multiple moving objects over time. Cognitive theories of this ability emphasize location information and differ on the importance of motion information. Results from several experiments have shown that increasing object speed impairs performance, although speed was confounded with other properties such as proximity of objects to one another. Here, we introduce a new paradigm to study multiple object tracking in which object speed and object proximity were manipulated independently. Like the motion of a planet and moon, each target-distractor pair rotated about both a common local point as well as the center of the screen. Tracking performance was strongly affected by object speed even when proximity was controlled. Additional results suggest that two different mechanisms are used in object tracking--one sensitive to speed and proximity and the other sensitive to the number of distractors. These observations support models of object tracking that include information about object motion and reject models that use location alone.
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Michael
M
Tombu
Adriane E
AE
Seiffert
D000054:Acceleration; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D004215:Distance Perception; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016081:Moon; D009039:Motion Perception; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D016083:Planets; D011601:Psychophysics
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Apr;31(2):235-47
15826227
Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):637-43
16102067
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):390-7
18488657
J Vis. 2007 Apr 03;7(6):2
17685785
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):516-23
17048740
Cogn Psychol. 2006 Jun;52(4):346-68
16442088
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
7605061
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):920-5
20534781
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):498-504
12930483
Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Mar;54(1):1-14
10721235
Cogn Psychol. 1992 Jul;24(3):295-340
1516359
Perception. 2006;35(4):483-95
16700291
J Vis. 2007 Oct 30;7(13):14.1-10
17997642
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul;9(7):349-54
15953754
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1975 Feb;39(1):21-41
1146596
Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):127-58
11245842
Vision Res. 2000;40(26):3651-64
11116167
Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8
5437004
Spat Vis. 1988;3(3):179-97
3153671
Percept Psychophys. 2007 May;69(4):567-77
17727110
J Vis. 2009 Apr 03;9(4):1.1-12
19757910
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):802-8
18792507
Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216
11689021
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
9176953
J Vis. 2009 Jul 14;9(7):9
19761324
J Vis. 2010 Apr 28;10(4):18.1-13
20465337
Cognition. 2008 Jul;108(1):201-9
18096148
J Vis. 2004 Dec 09;4(12):1020-43
15669909
Cognition. 2006 Aug;101(1):217-45
16359652
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Jun;56(4):237-83
17451667
Vision Res. 2005 Aug;45(17):2298-309
15924943
Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1166-73
18514756
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
9176952
J Vis. 2010 Apr 28;10(4):19.1-13
20465338
Cognition. 2008 Jul;108(1):1-25
18281028
Psychol Bull. 1985 May;97(3):530-46
4001240
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):3-18
12669744
Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):159-77
11245843
Vision Res. 2009 Jan;49(1):10-27
18930074