Relationships between muscle contributions to walking subtasks and functional walking status in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis.
BACKGROUND
Persons with post-stroke hemiparesis usually walk slowly and asymmetrically. Stroke severity and functional walking status are commonly predicted by post-stroke walking speed. The mechanisms that limit walking speed, and by extension functional walking status, need to be understood to improve post-stroke rehabilitation methods.


METHODS
Three-dimensional forward dynamics walking simulations of hemiparetic subjects (and speed-matched controls) with different levels of functional walking status were developed to investigate the relationships between muscle contributions to walking subtasks and functional walking status. Muscle contributions to forward propulsion, swing initiation and power generation were analyzed during the pre-swing phase of the gait cycle and compared between groups.


RESULTS
Contributions from the paretic leg muscles (i.e., soleus, gastrocnemius and gluteus medius) to forward propulsion increased with improved functional walking status, with the non-paretic leg muscles (i.e., rectus femoris and vastii) compensating for reduced paretic leg propulsion in the limited community walker. Contributions to swing initiation from both paretic (i.e., gastrocnemius, iliacus and psoas) and non-paretic leg muscles (i.e., hamstrings) also increased as functional walking status improved. Power generation was also an important indicator of functional walking status, with reduced paretic leg power generation limiting the paretic leg contribution to forward propulsion and leg swing initiation.


CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that deficits in muscle contributions to the walking subtasks of forward propulsion, swing initiation and power generation are directly related to functional walking status and that improving output in these muscle groups may be an effective rehabilitation strategy for improving post-stroke hemiparetic walking.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
A L
AL
Hall
C L
CL
Peterson
S A
SA
Kautz
R R
RR
Neptune
D005260:Female; D005684:Gait; D020233:Gait Disorders, Neurologic / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology*; D010291:Paresis / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology*; D020521:Stroke / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology*; D019415:Torque; D016138:Walking
J Biomech. 2010 Aug 26;43(12):2348-55
20466377
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 May;90(5):819-26
19406302
Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989;17(4):359-411
2676342
J Biomech. 2004 Sep;37(9):1447-53
15275854
J Biomech. 1988;21(12):1027-41
2577949
J Biomech. 1996 Jan;29(1):81-90
8839020
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):672-5
18971382
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2000;3(4):321-334
11264857
J Biomech. 1997 Jun;30(6):595-602
9165393
Stroke. 1995 Jun;26(6):982-9
7762050
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 Feb;14(2):125-35
10619100
Gait Posture. 2004 Apr;19(2):194-205
15013508
J Biomech. 2008 Nov 14;41(15):3243-52
18822415
J Biomech. 2006;39(10):1769-77
16046223
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Aug;105(2):486-94
18556431
J Biomech. 1987;20(2):187-201
3571299
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Aug;22(7):813-20
17512646
Gait Posture. 2008 Jul;28(1):135-43
18158246
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Apr;72(5):309-14
2009047
J Biomech. 2008;41(4):877-83
18067898
Stroke. 2006 Mar;37(3):872-6
16456121
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003 May-Jun;12(3):119-26
17903915
J Biomech. 2001 Nov;34(11):1387-98
11672713