Qualitative methods in health services and management research: pockets of excellence and progress, but still a long way to go.
The 10-year systematic review of published health services and management research by Weiner et al. (2011) chronicles the contributions of qualitative methods, highlights areas of substantial progress, and identifies areas in need of more progress. This article (Devers, 2011) discusses possible reasons for lack of progress in some areas--related to the under-supply of well-trained qualitative researchers and more tangible demand for their research--and mechanisms for future improvement. To ensure a robust health services research toolbox, the field must take additional steps to provide stronger education and training in qualitative methods and more funding and publication opportunities. Given the rapidly changing health care system post the passage of national health reform and the chalresearch issues associated with it, the health services research and management field will not meet its future challenges with quantitative methods alone or with a half-empty toolbox.
Urban Institute, Health Policy Center, Washington, DC 20037, USA. kdevers@urban.org
Kelly J
KJ
Devers
D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration; D004465:Economic Competition; D018166:Health Care Reform; D006291:Health Policy; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods*; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D007348:Insurance, Health; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012107:Research Design; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000193:education*