Neural development features: spatio-temporal development of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network.
The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, with information on neural connectivity, three-dimensional position and cell linage, provides a unique system for understanding the development of neural networks. Although C. elegans has been widely studied in the past, we present the first statistical study from a developmental perspective, with findings that raise interesting suggestions on the establishment of long-distance connections and network hubs. Here, we analyze the neuro-development for temporal and spatial features, using birth times of neurons and their three-dimensional positions. Comparisons of growth in C. elegans with random spatial network growth highlight two findings relevant to neural network development. First, most neurons which are linked by long-distance connections are born around the same time and early on, suggesting the possibility of early contact or interaction between connected neurons during development. Second, early-born neurons are more highly connected (tendency to form hubs) than later-born neurons. This indicates that the longer time frame available to them might underlie high connectivity. Both outcomes are not observed for random connection formation. The study finds that around one-third of electrically coupled long-range connections are late forming, raising the question of what mechanisms are involved in ensuring their accuracy, particularly in light of the extremely invariant connectivity observed in C. elegans. In conclusion, the sequence of neural network development highlights the possibility of early contact or interaction in securing long-distance and high-degree connectivity.
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Sreedevi
S
Varier
Marcus
M
Kaiser
D000818:Animals; D017173:Caenorhabditis elegans / Q000254:growth & development*; D009415:Nerve Net
Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2
9623998
Dev Biol. 2005 Jan 15;277(2):347-65
15617679
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):186-98
19190637
Cell. 1994 Aug 12;78(3):409-24
8062384
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 21;103(12):4723-8
16537428
J Neurosci. 1991 Apr;11(4):1117-25
2010807
Development. 1997 Sep;124(17):3253-62
9310320
Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:475-502
8811187
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Apr;9(4):511-8
16520734
Dev Biol. 1977 Mar;56(1):110-56
838129
Neuron. 1996 Jan;16(1):35-46
8562088
Neuron. 2007 May 3;54(3):357-69
17481390
PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Jul 21;2(7):e95
16848638
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):629-40
12154364
Dev Biol. 2000 Oct 1;226(1):137-51
10993679
Trends Genet. 1998 Aug;14(8):322-7
9724965
PLoS Biol. 2008 Jul 1;6(7):e159
18597554
PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Sep;1(4):e42
16201007
Dev Biol. 1983 Nov;100(1):64-119
6684600
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986 Nov 12;314(1165):1-340
22462104
Genes Dev. 2003 Apr 15;17(8):941-58
12704078
Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:237-52
2197976
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2007 Dec 15;365(1861):3033-45
17855223
Trends Cell Biol. 2002 Oct;12(10):479-84
12441252
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 22;103(34):12903-10
16901978
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jan;17(1):92-9
16452642
Hear Res. 2005 Jan;199(1-2):117-23
15574306
Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999 Aug 30;55(11):1355-7
10518985
Genetics. 2009 Nov;183(3):917-27
19737747