Development of a photographic scale for consistency and guidance in dermatologic assessment of forearm sun damage.
OBJECTIVE
To develop a photographic sun damage assessment scale for forearm skin and test its feasibility and utility for consistent classification of sun damage.


METHODS
For a blinded comparison, 96 standardized 8 × 10 digital photographs of participants' forearms were taken. Photographs were graded by an expert dermatologist using an existing 9-category dermatologic assessment scoring scale until all categories contained photographs representative of each of 4 clinical signs. Triplicate photographs were provided in identical image sets to 5 community dermatologists for blinded rating using the dermatologic assessment scoring scale.


METHODS
Academic skin cancer prevention clinic with high-level experience in assessment of sun-damaged skin.


METHODS
Volunteer sample including participants from screenings, chemoprevention, and/or biomarker studies.


METHODS
Reproducibility and agreement of grading among dermatologists by Spearman correlation coefficient to assess the correlation of scores given for the same photograph, κ statistics for ordinal data, and variability of scoring among dermatologists, using analysis of variance models with evaluating physician and photographs as main effects and interaction effect variables to account for the difference in scoring among dermatologists.


RESULTS
Correlations (73% to >90%) between dermatologists were all statistically significant (P < .001). Scores showed good to substantial agreement but were significantly different (P < .001) for each of 4 clinical signs and the difference varied significantly (P < .001) among photographs.


CONCLUSIONS
With good to substantial agreement, we found the development of a photographic forearm sun damage assessment scale highly feasible. In view of significantly different rating scores, a photographic reference for assessment of sun damage is also necessary.
Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85724-5024, USA. nmckenzie@azcc.arizona.edu
Naja E
NE
McKenzie
Kathylynn
K
Saboda
Laura D
LD
Duckett
Rayna
R
Goldman
Chengcheng
C
Hu
Clara N
CN
Curiel-Lewandrowski
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005260:Female; D005542:Forearm; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010781:Photography / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D012867:Skin / Q000473:pathology* / Q000528:radiation effects; D015595:Skin Aging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000528:radiation effects; D012878:Skin Neoplasms / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D014466:Ultraviolet Rays / Q000009:adverse effects*
Arch Dermatol. 1992 Mar;128(3):347-51
1550366
Br J Dermatol. 1992 Sep;127 Suppl 41:7-13
1390188
Br J Dermatol. 1990 Jan;122(1):91-8
2404514
J Int Med Res. 1990;18 Suppl 3:41C-48C
2227088
Scand J Caring Sci. 2005 Dec;19(4):427-31
16324069
Br J Dermatol. 1994 Feb;130(2):167-73
8123569
Biometrics. 1977 Jun;33(2):363-74
884196
Arch Dermatol. 2007 Mar;143(3):397-402
17372106
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Aug;37(2 Pt 1):227-30
9270508
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
843571