Decline of birds in a human modified coastal dune forest landscape in South Africa.
Previous studies demonstrate that old-growth forest remnants and vegetation regenerating after anthropogenic disturbance provide habitat for birds in a human modified coastal dune forest landscape in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. However, occurrence does not ensure persistence. Based on a 13-year monitoring database we calculated population trends for 37 bird species and general trends in overall bird density in different vegetation types. We evaluated species' characteristics as covariates of population trend and assessed changes in rainfall and proportional area and survey coverage per vegetation type. 76% of species assessed have declined, 57% significantly so at an average rate of 13.9% per year. Overall, bird density has fallen at 12.2% per year across old-growth forest and woody regenerating vegetation types. Changes in proportional area and coverage per vegetation type may partly explain trends for a few species but are unlikely to account for most. Below average rainfall may have contributed to bird declines. However, other possibilities warrant further investigation. Species with larger range extents tended to decline more sharply than did others, and these species may be responding to environmental changes on a broader geographical scale. Our results cast doubt on the future persistence of birds in this human modified landscape. More research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms driving population decline in the study area and to investigate whether the declines identified here are more widespread across the region and perhaps the continent.
Conservation Ecology Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Morgan J
MJ
Trimble
Rudi J
RJ
van Aarde
D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D001717:Birds; D017753:Ecosystem; D004777:Environment; D011157:Population Dynamics; D013019:South Africa; D014197:Trees
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Sep;19(9):470-4
16701309
Science. 1995 Mar 31;267(5206):1987-90
17770113
Conserv Biol. 2006 Feb;20(1):111-21
16909664
Conserv Biol. 2008 Feb;22(1):110-9
18273953
Science. 2006 Mar 31;311(5769):1917-21
16513946
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Oct;103 Suppl 7:165-71
8593865
Environ Pollut. 2001;112(3):443-61
11291451
Nature. 2001 May 17;411(6835):245
11357107
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 28;101(52):18042-7
15601765
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(19):7658-62
2798430
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):269-88
15814345
PLoS One. 2006 Dec 20;1:e63
17183694
Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Nov;8(11):409-13
21236213
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17852-4
18981411
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Oct;24(10):564-71
19665254
Biol Lett. 2008 Oct 23;4(5):599-602
18664422
Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):710-3
17507930