Distinct representations of a perceptual decision and the associated oculomotor plan in the monkey lateral intraparietal area.
Perceptual decisions that are used to select particular actions can appear to be formed in an intentional framework, in which sensory evidence is converted directly into a plan to act. However, because the relationship between perceptual decision-making and action selection has been tested primarily under conditions in which the two could not be dissociated, it is not known whether this intentional framework plays a general role in forming perceptual decisions or only reflects certain task conditions. To dissociate decision and motor processing in the brain, we recorded from individual neurons in the lateral intraparietal area of monkeys performing a task that included a flexible association between a decision about the direction of random-dot motion and the direction of the appropriate eye-movement response. We targeted neurons that responded selectively in anticipation of a particular eye-movement response. We found that these neurons encoded the perceptual decision in a manner that was distinct from how they encoded the associated response. These decision-related signals were evident regardless of whether the appropriate decision-response association was indicated before, during, or after decision formation. The results suggest that perceptual decision-making and action selection are different brain processes that only appear to be inseparable under particular behavioral contexts.
Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6074, USA.
Sharath
S
Bennur
Joshua I
JI
Gold
D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D004594:Electrophysiology; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D008253:Macaca mulatta; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D010296:Parietal Lobe / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology
Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):165-8
11805833
J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Jan 30;176(2):104-11
18831988
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jun;6(6):616-23
12730699
Nature. 2004 Oct 14;431(7010):859-62
15483614
Nature. 1998 Oct 1;395(6701):500-3
9774105
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;86(4):1916-36
11600651
Nature. 2006 Sep 7;443(7107):85-8
16936716
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:319-49
10202542
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jan;101(1):289-305
18987126
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:227-77
9530497
Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):365-78
15473973
Nat Neurosci. 2006 May;9(5):682-9
16604069
Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1433-41
10788650
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):505-13
18327253
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:1-21
20192813
Nature. 2000 Mar 23;404(6776):390-4
10746726
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2653-68
18753326
J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 1;22(21):9475-89
12417672
J Comp Neurol. 1990 Sep 22;299(4):421-45
2243159
Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):655-63
19377473
J Neurophysiol. 1991 Sep;66(3):1109-24
1753277
Exp Brain Res. 1988;70(1):216-20
3402565
J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 18;29(7):2136-50
19228966
Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1075-80
17546027
J Neurophysiol. 2004 May;91(5):2281-96
14711971
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
7063747
Nature. 2000 Dec 21-28;408(6815):971-5
11140683
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Feb;2(2):176-85
10195203
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):939-73; discussion 973-1031
12239892
J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 20;26(38):9761-70
16988047
Vision Res. 1979;19(5):515-22
483579
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
17600525
Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1782-7
15205529
Nature. 1999 Jul 15;400(6741):233-8
10421364
J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 29;29(17):5671-80
19403833
Science. 1999 May 14;284(5417):1158-61
10325224
J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 1;27(31):8161-5
17670959
J Neurosci. 2003 Jan 15;23(2):632-51
12533623