Computer decision support software safely improves glycemic control in the burn intensive care unit: a randomized controlled clinical study.
The optimal method for glycemic control in the critically burned patient is unknown. The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to determine the safety and efficacy of computer decision support software (CDSS) to control serum glucose concentration in a burn intensive care unit. Eighteen adult burn/trauma patients receiving continuous insulin infusion were initially randomized to receive glucose management by a traditional paper protocol or a computer protocol (CP) for 72 hours and then crossed over to the alternate method for an additional 72 hours. Time in target glucose range (range: 80-110 mg/dl) was higher in the CP group (47 ± 17% vs 41 ± 16.6%; P ≤ .05); time over target range was not significantly reduced in the CP group (49 ± 17.8% vs 54 ± 17.1%; P = .08); and no difference was noted in time under target range of 80 mg/dl (CP: 4.5 ± 2.8%, paper protocol: 4.8 ± 3.3%; P = .8), less than 60 mg/dl (P = .7), and less than 40 mg/dl (P = 1.0). Severe hypoglycemic events (<40 mg/dl) did not differ from the CP group compared with historical controls for patients receiving no insulin (P = .6). More glucose measurements were performed in the CP group (P = .0003), and nursing staff compliance with CP recommendations was greater (P < .0001). Glycemic control using CDSS is safe and effective for the critically burned patient. Time in target range improved without increase in hypoglycemic events. CDSS enhanced consistency in practice, providing standardization among nursing staff.
US Army Burn Center, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Elizabeth A
EA
Mann
John A
JA
Jones
Steven E
SE
Wolf
Charles E
CE
Wade
D000208:Acute Disease; D000328:Adult; D001786:Blood Glucose; D002053:Burn Units / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D002056:Burns / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006943:Hyperglycemia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000517:prevention & control; D007003:Hypoglycemia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000517:prevention & control; D007362:Intensive Care Units / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D049451:Nomograms; D005791:Patient Care; D012449:Safety; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D013781:Texas; D055815:Young Adult
D001786:Blood Glucose
J Burn Care Res. 2008 Sep-Oct;29(5):718-23
18825791
J Trauma. 2005 Nov;59(5):1148-54
16385293
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 Jan-Feb;32(1):18-27
18165443
Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):2262-7
17717490
Am J Surg. 2007 Dec;194(6):798-803; discussion 803
18005774
Ann Surg. 2006 Jun;243(6):786-92; discussion 792-5
16772782
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008 Jun;22(3):377-82
18503924
Am J Crit Care. 2006 Jul;15(4):370-7
16823014
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1283-97
19318384
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Jun;9(3):232-40
17561793
Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2316-21
18596625
Am J Med Qual. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):489-97
19666741
Diabetes Care. 2005 Oct;28(10):2418-23
16186273
J Crit Care. 2007 Jun;22(2):112-8; discussion 118-9
17548021
Crit Care. 2009;13(5):R163
19822000
J Trauma. 2001 Sep;51(3):540-4
11535907
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1359-67
11794168
Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov;30(11):2438-42
12441751
Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R24
18302732
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1787-95
18520641
Surgery. 2008 Oct;144(4):629-35; discussion 635-7
18847648
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 2;354(5):449-61
16452557
Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):3008-13
18824908
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Jan;53(1):61-5
18945247
Ann Plast Surg. 2000 Dec;45(6):629-32
11128762
J Burn Care Res. 2008 Sep-Oct;29(5):683-94
18695610
Resuscitation. 2004 Jan;60(1):71-7
14987787
J Trauma. 2008 Jan;64(1):15-20; discussion 20-1
18188093