Clinical and radiological outcome of conservative vs. surgical treatment of atraumatic degenerative rotator cuff rupture: design of a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
Subacromial impingement syndrome is a frequently observed disorder in orthopedic practice. Lasting symptoms and impairment may occur when a subsequent atraumatic rotator cuff rupture is also present. However, degenerative ruptures of the rotator cuff can also be observed in asymptomatic elderly individuals. Treatment of these symptomatic degenerative ruptures may be conservative or surgical. Acceptable results are reported for both treatment modalities. No evidence-based level-1 studies have been conducted so far to compare these treatment modalities. The objective of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in outcome between surgical reconstruction and conservative treatment of a degenerative atraumatic rotator cuff tendon rupture.


METHODS
A randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients aged between 45 and 75 with a symptomatic atraumatic rotator cuff rupture as diagnosed by MRI will be included. Exclusion criteria are traumatic rotator cuff rupture, frozen shoulder and diabetes mellitus. Patients will be randomized into two groups. Conservative treatment includes physical therapy according to a standardized protocol, NSAIDs and, if indicated, subacromial infiltration with a local anesthetic and corticosteroids. Surgical reconstruction is performed under general anesthesia in combination with an interscalenus plexus block. An acromioplasty with reconstruction of the rotator cuff tendon is performed, as described by Rockwood et al. Measurements take place preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measure is the Constant score. Secondary measures include both disease-specific and generic outcome measures, and an economic evaluation. Additionally, one year after inclusion a second MRI will be taken of all patients in order to determine whether extent and localization of the rupture as well as the amount of fatty degeneration are prognostic factors.


CONCLUSIONS
Both surgical as conservative treatment of a symptomatic atraumatic rotator cuff tendon rupture is used in current practice. There is a lack of level-1 studies comparing surgical vs. conservative treatment. This randomized controlled trial has been designed to determine whether the surgical treatment of a degenerative atraumatic rotator cuff tendon rupture may lead to a better functional and radiological outcome than conservative treatment after one year of follow-up.


BACKGROUND
Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTRTC2343.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, PO 300033, 9700RM Groningen, The Netherlands. lamberfo@mzh.nl
Frederik O
FO
Lambers Heerspink
Roy Ag
RA
Hoogeslag
Ron L
RL
Diercks
Pepijn Jm
PJ
van Eerden
Inge
I
van den Akker-Scheek
Jos Jam
JJ
van Raay
D000368:Aged; D002985:Clinical Protocols / Q000145:classification / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D017006:Rotator Cuff / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D000070636:Rotator Cuff Injuries; D019534:Shoulder Impingement Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D013708:Tendon Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 May-Jun;10(3):209-16
11408900
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Sep;96(5):500-5
20554492
Ann Biomed Eng. 2004 Jan;32(1):166-70
14964732
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Mar;55(512):224-8
15808040
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Dec;50(12):3751-61
15593187
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 May-Jun;10(3):199-203
11408898
Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1995;54(1):30-1
8541777
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 17;153(4):246-55
20621893
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD005619
18254085
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Oct;86(10):2212-5
15466730
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;12(6):550-4
14671517
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Mar;(173):70-7
6825348
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):165-73
1735208
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Mar-Apr;15(2):164-72
16517358
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;13(5):517-21
15383807
Am J Sports Med. 2008 May;36(5):987-93
18413681
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;30(4):558-64
12130411
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):953-60
17473131
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):178-88
7497666
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):290-9
16679227
Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Dec;54(12):959-64
8546527
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4
3791738
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jun;468(6):1476-84
20352390
Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Jul;33(7):663-7
8019796
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jan;(382):99-107
11154011
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 May 30;142(22):1266-9
9749299
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jul;68(6):887-91
3733777
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):78-83
8020238
Arthritis Care Res. 1991 Dec;4(4):143-9
11188601
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jan;77(1):10-5
7822341
Arthroscopy. 2007 Jan;23(1):81-8
17210431
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;8(1):26-30
10077792