Worm Phenotype Ontology: integrating phenotype data within and beyond the C. elegans community.
BACKGROUND
Caenorhabditis elegans gene-based phenotype information dates back to the 1970's, beginning with Sydney Brenner and the characterization of behavioral and morphological mutant alleles via classical genetics in order to understand nervous system function. Since then C. elegans has become an important genetic model system for the study of basic biological and biomedical principles, largely through the use of phenotype analysis. Because of the growth of C. elegans as a genetically tractable model organism and the development of large-scale analyses, there has been a significant increase of phenotype data that needs to be managed and made accessible to the research community. To do so, a standardized vocabulary is necessary to integrate phenotype data from diverse sources, permit integration with other data types and render the data in a computable form.


RESULTS
We describe a hierarchically structured, controlled vocabulary of terms that can be used to standardize phenotype descriptions in C. elegans, namely the Worm Phenotype Ontology (WPO). The WPO is currently comprised of 1,880 phenotype terms, 74% of which have been used in the annotation of phenotypes associated with greater than 18,000 C. elegans genes. The scope of the WPO is not exclusively limited to C. elegans biology, rather it is devised to also incorporate phenotypes observed in related nematode species. We have enriched the value of the WPO by integrating it with other ontologies, thereby increasing the accessibility of worm phenotypes to non-nematode biologists. We are actively developing the WPO to continue to fulfill the evolving needs of the scientific community and hope to engage researchers in this crucial endeavor.


CONCLUSIONS
We provide a phenotype ontology (WPO) that will help to facilitate data retrieval, and cross-species comparisons within the nematode community. In the larger scientific community, the WPO will permit data integration, and interoperability across the different Model Organism Databases (MODs) and other biological databases. This standardized phenotype ontology will therefore allow for more complex data queries and enhance bioinformatic analyses.
Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Gary
G
Schindelman
Jolene S
JS
Fernandes
Carol A
CA
Bastiani
Karen
K
Yook
Paul W
PW
Sternberg
D000818:Animals; D017173:Caenorhabditis elegans / Q000235:genetics*; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval / Q000592:standards*; D010641:Phenotype; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D018875:Vocabulary, Controlled
Curr Biol. 2001 Feb 6;11(3):171-6
11231151
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Nov;25(11):1251-5
17989687
Curr Biol. 2009 Nov 17;19(21):1853-60
19836240
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D768-72
17991680
Development. 2000 Dec;127(24):5265-76
11076749
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Nov;83(5):610-5
18950739
PLoS Biol. 2004 Nov;2(11):e309
15383839
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Mar;5(3):213-22
14970823
Genetics. 2000 Sep;156(1):123-41
10978280
Cell. 1998 Dec 23;95(7):981-91
9875852
Science. 2009 Nov 13;326(5955):994-8
19797623
WormBook. 2006 Jun 14;:1-19
18050452
Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):579-606
7713419
WormBook. 2005 Sep 23;:1-23
18023117
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Oct;85(4):457-64
19800049
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 6;107(14):6544-9
20308572
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D484-8
16381917
Genome Biol. 2001;2(2):REVIEWS1005
11182891
PLoS Biol. 2009 Nov;7(11):e1000247
19956802
Science. 2006 Mar 10;311(5766):1481-4
16527984
Genome Biol. 2005;6(1):R8
15642100
J Comp Neurol. 1981 May 20;198(3):435-51
7240452
Nature. 2000 Nov 16;408(6810):331-6
11099034
Genetics. 2005 Nov;171(3):1033-45
16079230
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D26-32
19934255
Comp Funct Genomics. 2002;3(2):132-6
18628886
Curr Biol. 2002 Nov 19;12(22):1959-64
12445391
Curr Biol. 2000 Dec 14-28;10(24):1619-22
11137018
Curr Biol. 2009 Nov 17;19(21):R977-9
19922851
PLoS Biol. 2005 Jan;3(1):e6
15630478
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
10802651
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D793-6
18842627
Development. 1991 May;112(1):231-40
1769331
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D463-7
19910365
Curr Biol. 2008 Aug 5;18(15):1101-9
18674914
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Jul;22(7):345-50
17416439
Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):149-64
9136008
Brief Bioinform. 2006 Sep;7(3):256-74
16899495
Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):231-7
12529635
WormBook. 2007 May 03;:1-16
18050493
N Engl J Med. 1984 Mar 1;310(9):550-3
6694706
Methods Mol Biol. 2006;351:31-50
16988424
Genome Biol. 2012 Jan 31;13(1):R5
22293552
BMC Dev Biol. 2007 Sep 05;7:101
17803822
Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):71-94
4366476
Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):806-11
9486653
Science. 2009 Nov 13;326(5955):1002-5
19965511
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 15;101(24):9003-8
15184656
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2007 Sep 15;308(5):655-68
17599725
Science. 1998 Dec 11;282(5396):2012-8
9851916
Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 Jan;46(1):63-8
15659431
Genetics. 1988 May;119(1):43-61
3396865
Nature. 2008 Jan 31;451(7178):569-72
18185515
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2008 May;7(3):195-204
18417533
Database (Oxford). 2009;2009:bap001
20157474
Genome Res. 2005 Dec;15(12):1651-60
16339362
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D698-704
21071413
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;1(3):390-399
20052305
Genome Res. 2002 Oct;12(10):1599-610
12368253
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D472-5
17099225
Dev Cell. 2009 Jun;16(6):833-43
19531354
Genome Biol. 2005;6(5):R46
15892874
Dev Cell. 2009 Oct;17(4):459-69
19853560
Genome Biol. 2010 Jan 08;11(1):R2
20064205
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D344-50
17932057
Bioinformatics. 2007 Aug 15;23(16):2198-200
17545183
Genome Res. 2004 Jul;14(7):1207-20
15231741
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Oct 08;10 Suppl 11:S20
19811686
Genome Biol. 2005;6(1):R7
15642099