Bimanual training in stroke: How do coupling and symmetry-breaking matter?
BACKGROUND
The dramatic consequences of stroke on patient autonomy in daily living activities urged the need for new reliable therapeutic strategies. Recently, bimanual training has emerged as a promising tool to improve the functional recovery of upper-limbs in stroke patients. However, who could benefit from bimanual therapy and how it could be used as a part of a more complete rehabilitation protocol remain largely unknown. A possible reason explaining this situation is that coupling and symmetry-breaking mechanisms, two fundamental principles governing bimanual behaviour, have been largely under-explored in both research and rehabilitation in stroke.


CONCLUSIONS
Bimanual coordination emerges as an active, task-specific assembling process where the limbs are constrained to act as a single unit by virtue of mutual coupling. Consequently, exploring, assessing, re-establishing and exploiting functional bimanual synergies following stroke, require moving beyond the classical characterization of performance of each limb in separate and isolated fashion, to study coupling signatures at both neural and behavioural levels. Grounded on the conceptual framework of the dynamic system approach to bimanual coordination, we debated on two main assumptions: 1) stroke-induced impairment of bimanual coordination might be anticipated/understood by comparing, in join protocols, changes in coupling strength and asymmetry of bimanual discrete movements observed in healthy people and those observed in stroke; 2) understanding/predicting behavioural manifestations of decrease in bimanual coupling strength and/or increase in interlimb asymmetry might constitute an operational prerequisite to adapt therapy and better target training at the specific needs of each patient. We believe that these statements draw new directions for experimental and clinical studies and contribute in promoting bimanual training as an efficient and adequate tool to facilitate the paretic upper-limb recovery and to restore spontaneous bimanual synergies.


CONCLUSIONS
Since bimanual control deficits have scarcely been systematically investigated, the eventual benefits of bimanual coordination practice in stroke rehabilitation remains poorly understood. In the present paper we argued that a better understanding of coupling and symmetry-breaking mechanisms in both the undamaged and stroke-lesioned neuro-behavioral system should provide a better understanding of stroke-related alterations of bimanual synergies, and help clinicians to adapt therapy in order to maximize rehabilitation benefits.
UMR 6233 Institut des Sciences du Mouvement E.J. Marey, CNRS & Université de la Méditerranée, 163 Avenue de Luminy, CP 910, 13288 Marseille, France.
Rita
R
Sleimen-Malkoun
Jean-Jacques
JJ
Temprado
Laurent
L
Thefenne
Eric
E
Berton
D026241:Exercise Movement Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D009048:Motor Skills / Q000502:physiology*; D020521:Stroke / Q000503:physiopathology; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation; D034941:Upper Extremity / Q000503:physiopathology
Psychol Res. 2008 Mar;72(2):123-37
17021836
Stroke. 2004 Jan;35(1):134-9
14684785
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(7):687-98
11311299
Hum Mov Sci. 2005 Oct-Dec;24(5-6):849-64
16343673
BMC Neurol. 2008 Apr 11;8:7
18405377
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 May;83(5):702-7
11994811
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Feb;169(2):194-207
16331509
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005 Nov;49(3):641-62
15904971
JAMA. 2004 Oct 20;292(15):1853-61
15494583
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;59(3):271-9
7673955
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Jun;110(2-3):139-59
12102103
Brain. 2008 May;131(Pt 5):1381-90
18356189
Am J Physiol. 1984 Jun;246(6 Pt 2):R1000-4
6742155
Biol Cybern. 1990;63(4):257-70
2207200
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1088-97
7964529
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 May;17(2):359-81
1830081
Neurosci Lett. 2000 Apr 7;283(2):93-6
10739883
N Engl J Med. 1975 Nov 6;293(19):954-6
1178004
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Nov;86(11):2131-7
16271560
Biol Cybern. 1985;51(5):347-56
3978150
Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2181-6
12907818
AACN Clin Issues. 2005 Oct-Dec;16(4):421-40; quiz 597-8
16269890
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Apr;131(3):305-19
10789946
J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):174-88
15130868
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Dec;27(6):1485-97
11766938
Occup Ther Int. 2009;16(3-4):190-203
19517519
J Neurosci. 2002 Sep 15;22(18):8297-304
12223584
Ann Biomed Eng. 1999 Nov-Dec;27(6):815-29
10625153
Brain. 1989 Jun;112 ( Pt 3):749-63
2731028
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 May;3(5):348-59
11988774
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jul;85(7):1076-83
15241753
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Apr;85(4):629-34
15083440
Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(2):119-22
15924514
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 13;96(8):4645-9
10200316
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1983 May;35(Pt 2):347-75
6571316
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 May;43(2):205-21
1866457
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Nov;87(11):1463-70
17084121
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004 Fall;11(4):20-30
15592987
Stroke. 2000 Oct;31(10):2390-5
11022069
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):388-97
17369510
Clin Rehabil. 2005 Jun;19(4):452-62
15929515
Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;75(5):309-20
15885874
Neurol Sci. 2005 Jun;26(2):72-80
15995823
Stroke. 1999 May;30(5):949-55
10229726
Stroke. 1996 Sep;27(9):1564-70
8784131
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Feb;154(3):267-74
14608455
J Mot Behav. 1981 Dec;13(4):226-61
15215072
J Exp Psychol. 1954 Jun;47(6):381-91
13174710
Curr Opin Neurol. 2005 Dec;18(6):667-74
16280678
Biol Cybern. 1980;37(4):219-25
7448245
Biol Cybern. 1999 Oct;81(4):343-58
10541937
Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):400-9
14991818
Phys Ther. 1992 Sep;72(9):624-33
1508970
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010 Oct;14(4):435-62
20887689
NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(1):29-41
18356587
Hum Mov Sci. 2010 Oct;29(5):853-70
19926154
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Apr;119(4):744-62
18187362
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Jun;110(2-3):321-37
12102112
Hum Mov Sci. 2003 Aug;22(3):339-63
12967762
Biol Cybern. 2007 Feb;96(2):265-78
17082953
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1997 Aug;50(3):684-704
9314730
Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Jan 10-20;22(1-2):23-37
10661755
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;629:83-91
19227496
J Exp Psychol. 1964 Feb;67:103-12
14114905
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(7):855-67
14998701
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(1):59-75
12923603
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1991 Sep;62(3):302-8
1925058
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 May;5(2):229-38
528935
Phys Ther. 1993 Jun;73(6):374-80; discussion 381-5
8497512