The role of within-compound associations in learning about absent cues.
When two cues are reinforced together (in compound), most associative models assume that animals learn an associative network that includes direct cue-outcome associations and a within-compound association. All models of associative learning subscribe to the importance of cue-outcome associations, but most models assume that within-compound associations are irrelevant to each cue's subsequent behavioral control. In the present article, we present an extension of Van Hamme and Wasserman's (Learning and Motivation 25:127-151, 1994) model of retrospective revaluation based on learning about absent cues that are retrieved through within-compound associations. The model was compared with a model lacking retrieval through within-compound associations. Simulations showed that within-compound associations are necessary for the model to explain higher-order retrospective revaluation and the observed greater retrospective revaluation after partial reinforcement than after continuous reinforcement alone. These simulations suggest that the associability of an absent stimulus is determined by the extent to which the stimulus is activated through the within-compound association.
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton, 13902-6000, USA.
James E
JE
Witnauer
Ralph R
RR
Miller
D001245:Association Learning; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003463:Cues; D008960:Models, Psychological
Learn Behav. 2005 May;33(2):131-46
16075834
Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):191-203
18355987
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Jan;38(1):40-51
21707201
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Oct;32(4):481-7
17044751
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Oct;35(4):498-508
19839702
Learn Behav. 2011 Mar;39(1):46-56
21264561
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2001 Feb;54(1):27-51
11216299
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):322-7
19429226
Learn Behav. 2010 Feb;38(1):68-79
20065350
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2002 Apr;55(2):137-51
12075980
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1999 May;52(2):159-85
10371872
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1998 May;51(2):121-38
9621838
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1999 Nov;52(4):307-33
10605392
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Oct;35(4):473-84
19839700
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):759-83
17638505
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1996 Feb;49(1):60-80
8901386
Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):640-76
18729595
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Oct;33(4):440-50
17924791
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2004 Jan;57(1):25-53
14690848