Aesthetic response to color combinations: preference, harmony, and similarity.
Previous studies of preference for and harmony of color combinations have produced confusing results. For example, some claim that harmony increases with hue similarity, whereas others claim that it decreases. We argue that such confusions are resolved by distinguishing among three types of judgments about color pairs: (1) preference for the pair as a whole, (2) harmony of the pair as a whole, and (3) preference for its figural color when viewed against its colored background. Empirical support for this distinction shows that pair preference and harmony both increase as hue similarity increases, but preference relies more strongly on component color preference and lightness contrast. Although pairs with highly contrastive hues are generally judged to be neither preferable nor harmonious, figural color preference ratings increase as hue contrast with the background increases. The present results thus refine and clarify some of the best-known and most contentious claims of color theorists.
University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1650, USA. kschloss@berkeley.edu
Karen B
KB
Schloss
Stephen E
SE
Palmer
D002755:Choice Behavior; D003118:Color Perception; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D004954:Esthetics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011601:Psychophysics
Perception. 2011;40(9):1063-80
22208128
Perception. 1977;6(1):113-9
840617
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82
15582859
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8877-82
20421475
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 7;97(23):12834-9
11058148
Appl Opt. 1970 Jul 1;9(7):1513-62
20076422
Science. 1953 Jan 16;117(3029):59-61
13028283
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Mar;1(1):29-55
24203413
Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R623-5
17714645
Nature. 1952 Nov 8;170(4332):778-9
13002441
Vision Res. 1978;18(12):1649-61
726318
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):498-504
21380587
Vision Res. 1976;16(3):289-95
1266073