Position specificity of adaptation-related face aftereffects.
It has been shown that prolonged exposure to a human face leads to shape-selective visual aftereffects. It seems that these face-specific aftereffects (FAEs) have multiple components, related to the adaptation of earlier and higher level processing of visual stimuli. The largest magnitude of FAE, using long-term adaptation periods, is usually observed at the retinotopic position of the preceding adaptor stimulus. However, FAE is also detected, to a smaller degree, at other retinal positions in a spatially invariant way and this component depends less on the adaptation duration. Several lines of evidences suggest that while the position-specific FAE involves lower level areas of the ventral processing stream, the position-invariant FAE depends on the activation of higher level face-processing areas and the fusiform gyrus in particular. In the present paper, we summarize the available behavioural, electrophysiological and neuroimaging results regarding the spatial selectivity of FAE and discuss their implications for the visual stability of object representations across saccadic eye movements.
Department of Cognitive Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest H-1111, Hungary.
Márta
M
Zimmer
Gyula
G
Kovács
D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D005145:Face / Q000502:physiology*; D005366:Figural Aftereffect / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D012160:Retina / Q000502:physiology*; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000502:physiology*
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2109-28
17118927
J Vis. 2009 Sep 10;9(10):10.1-17
19810791
Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):558-66
14629686
Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 18;17(18):1568-73
17764942
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1738-55
17093130
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Jul;33(7):1133-44
19500617
Neuroimage. 2004 Nov;23(3):905-13
15528090
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Feb;10(2):249-55
17195842
Vision Res. 2007 Aug;47(17):2291-6
17619045
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Oct;9(10):1337-43
16998482
Cereb Cortex. 2000 Jan;10(1):69-81
10639397
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Aug;8(8):363-70
15335463
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19552-7
17164335
Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):187-203
10677037
Brain Topogr. 2009 Sep;22(2):83-96
19322649
Brain Res. 2010 Mar 31;1322:81-91
20122901
Brain Res. 2006 Oct 18;1115(1):108-20
16930564
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):639-43
19084547
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jan;4(1):89-94
11135650
J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3155-64
17344377
J Neurosci. 2006 May 24;26(21):5616-27
16723518
Neuron. 2005 Mar 3;45(5):793-800
15748853
Brain. 2003 Nov;126(Pt 11):2381-95
12876150
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):147-53
20189870
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Mar 1;6(3):136-143
11861192
Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(25):3141-9
17935749
Spat Vis. 1996;9(4):423-74
8774089
Neuroreport. 2007 May 7;18(7):693-6
17426601
Vision Res. 2001 Oct;41(23):2979-94
11704237
J Vis. 2008 Dec 18;8(14):23.1-16
19146324
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):423-5
17369824
Cereb Cortex. 2007 May;17(5):1164-72
16818474
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Feb;18(2):364-70
17507454
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):836-52
17303440
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Dec;6(4):647-53
10682208
Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(20):2070-89
18513781
J Neurophysiol. 1972 Jan;35(1):96-111
4621506
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 26;28(13):3374-83
18367604
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Mar 1;2(3):111-7
21227087
Hippocampus. 2006;16(7):604-16
16770797
Neuroreport. 2004 Nov 15;15(16):2491-4
15538181
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jan;17(1):63-70
16436684
Curr Biol. 2005 Oct 11;15(19):1745-8
16213821
J Vis. 2009 Jun 11;9(6):8.1-16
19761299
Prog Neurobiol. 2003 May;70(1):53-81
12927334
Neurology. 1988 May;38(5):690-6
3362363
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Nov;60(11):1457-67
17853233
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2002 Mar;1(1):63-75
17715586
Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1385-94
16870475
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Feb;3(2):191-7
10649576
Neuroreport. 2005 Nov 28;16(17):1945-9
16272884
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jun;20(1):37-45
15130587
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Aug;92(2):1241-7
15056686
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Jun;31(3):420-37
15982123
Trends Neurosci. 2006 May;29(5):250-6
16529826
Perception. 2004;33(8):915-25
15521691
Biol Psychol. 1999 Jul;50(3):173-89
10461804
Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 1;40(2):415-419
18063389
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 May 7;272(1566):897-904
16024343
J Vis. 2007 Jun 08;7(8):3
17685810
Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 15;43(1):156-64
18672076
J Neurosci. 2008 Jul 2;28(27):6938-49
18596168
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 27;366(1564):504-15
21242139
Brain Res. 2007 Jan 5;1127(1):80-9
17109830
Vision Res. 1991;31(2):223-36
2017883
Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 1;42(4):1714-27
18674625
Vision Res. 1999 Sep;39(18):3145-55
10664810
Curr Biol. 2004 Dec 14;14(23):2119-23
15589154
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;17(6):506-13
16771801
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Nov;19(11):1815-26
17958484
J Neurosci. 1984 Aug;4(8):2051-62
6470767
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;12(12):466-73
18951831
J Vis. 2008 May 30;8(5):17.1-10
18842088
Perception. 2003;32(9):1109-16
14651323
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;89(6):3264-78
12783959
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Feb;232(2):609-18
24276312
J Comp Neurol. 2000 Oct 30;426(4):505-18
11027395
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;102(4):2435-40
19692506
Cereb Cortex. 2006 May;16(5):742-53
16120795
Vision Res. 2008 Jan;48(1):42-54
18078975
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jun;17(6):1402-11
16905593
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Oct;22(10):2345-56
19702459
PLoS One. 2007 Jun 27;2(6):e574
17593973
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan;10(1):14-23
16321563
Nature. 2004 Apr 1;428(6982):557-61
15058304
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Aug;4(8):845-50
11477432
Neuroreport. 2004 Jun 7;15(8):1261-5
15167545
PLoS One. 2008 May 21;3(5):e2195
18493304
Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(14):1815-28
15797771
J Neurosci. 2010 May 12;30(19):6700-12
20463232
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(8):2203-13
18394660
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Dec;94(6):4188-95
16120668
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 27;366(1564):572-85
21242144
Br J Psychol. 1986 Aug;77 ( Pt 3):305-27
3756376
J Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;23(1):339-48
12514233
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Jan;10(3):355-64
11167061
J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 9;28(15):3988-99
18400898