Good genes and sexual selection in dung beetles (Onthophagus taurus): genetic variance in egg-to-adult and adult viability.
Whether species exhibit significant heritable variation in fitness is central for sexual selection. According to good genes models there must be genetic variation in males leading to variation in offspring fitness if females are to obtain genetic benefits from exercising mate preferences, or by mating multiply. However, sexual selection based on genetic benefits is controversial, and there is limited unambiguous support for the notion that choosy or polyandrous females can increase the chances of producing offspring with high viability. Here we examine the levels of additive genetic variance in two fitness components in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. We found significant sire effects on egg-to-adult viability and on son, but not daughter, survival to sexual maturity, as well as moderate coefficients of additive variance in these traits. Moreover, we do not find evidence for sexual antagonism influencing genetic variation for fitness. Our results are consistent with good genes sexual selection, and suggest that both pre- and postcopulatory mate choice, and male competition could provide indirect benefits to females.
Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia. pgarcia@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Francisco
F
Garcia-Gonzalez
Leigh W
LW
Simmons
D000375:Aging; D000818:Animals; D001517:Coleoptera / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D003163:Competitive Behavior; D005260:Female; D014644:Genetic Variation; D008018:Life Cycle Stages / Q000235:genetics*; D008297:Male; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal
Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):195-204
1732160
Evolution. 2008 Oct;62(10):2580-91
18691259
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jun;19(6):323-8
16701278
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 14;99(10):6828-32
11983863
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 31;103(44):16346-51
17053078
PLoS Biol. 2010 Mar 16;8(3):e1000335
20305719
Evolution. 1991 Sep;45(6):1431-1442
28563835
Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 15;19(17):1442-6
19664925
Science. 2009 Jun 26;324(5935):1705-6
19556506
Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1107-10
17597758
Am Nat. 2004 Oct;164(4):457-72
15459878
Nature. 2001 Apr 5;410(6829):684-6
11287953
PLoS Biol. 2006 Nov;4(11):e356
17105343
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21-64
10740892
Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):84-6
16672970
Am Nat. 2003 Jun;161(6):852-9
12858271
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Oct 26;8:295
18950531
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 13;98(4):1671-5
11172009
J Evol Biol. 2003 Sep;16(5):1055-60
14635921
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16604-8
17921254
Nature. 2004 May 6;429(6987):65-7
15129280
Evolution. 1995 Feb;49(1):1-8
28593672
Heredity (Edinb). 2008 Jan;100(1):32-8
17786161
Evolution. 2007 Apr;61(4):816-24
17439614
Evolution. 2002 Aug;56(8):1622-31
12353755
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 7;269(1486):97-104
11788042
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jun;19(6):329-33
16701279
Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):936-41
10937266