Biomechanics of far cortical locking.
The development of far cortical locking (FCL) was motivated by a conundrum: locked plating constructs provide inherently rigid stabilization, yet they should facilitate biologic fixation and secondary bone healing that relies on flexible fixation to stimulate callus formation. Recent studies have confirmed that the high stiffness of standard locked plating constructs can suppress interfragmentary motion to a level that is insufficient to reliably promote secondary fracture healing by callus formation. Furthermore, rigid locking screws cause an uneven stress distribution that may lead to stress fracture at the end screw and stress shielding under the plate. This review summarizes four key features of FCL constructs that have been shown to enhance fixation and healing of fractures: flexible fixation, load distribution, progressive stiffening, and parallel interfragmentary motion. Specifically, flexible fixation provided by FCL reduces the stiffness of a locked plating construct by 80% to 88% to actively promote callus proliferation similar to an external fixator. Load is evenly distributed between FCL screws to mitigate stress risers at the end screw. Progressive stiffening occurs by near cortex support of FCL screws and provides additional support under elevated loading. Finally, parallel interfragmentary motion by the S-shaped flexion of FCL screws promotes symmetric callus formation. In combination, these features of FCL constructs have been shown to induce more callus and to yield significantly stronger and more consistent healing compared with standard locked plating constructs. As such, FCL constructs function as true internal fixators by replicating the biomechanical behavior and biologic healing response of external fixators.
Biomechanics Laboratory, Legacy Research & Technology Center, Portland, OR, USA. mbottlan@lhs.org
Michael
M
Bottlang
Florian
F
Feist
D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001860:Bone Plates; D001863:Bone Screws; D004867:Equipment Design; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Jul;21(6):362-8
17620993
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug;91(8):1985-94
19651958
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1995 Dec;10(8):401-406
11415586
J Orthop Sci. 2006 Mar;11(2):118-26
16568382
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jul 7;92(7):1652-60
20595573
J Trauma. 1996 Jan;40(1):5-9
8576998
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Jul;56(5):1001-22
4603167
J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Sep;18(8):540-5
15475850
J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Sep;18(8):488-93
15475843
J Orthop Trauma. 1988;2(4):284-96
3249254
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Jul;18(6):518-22
12828901
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91(3):620-7
19255222
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355 Suppl):S132-47
9917634
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Apr;395(4):421-8
20358382
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Jun;69(5):734-44
3597473
Injury. 2003 Nov;34 Suppl 2:B1-3
14580979
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1528-34
18674988
Injury. 2010 Jun;41(6):652-6
20236642
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88 Suppl 4:189-200
17142448
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Nov;84(8):1093-110
12463652
Injury. 2003 Nov;34 Suppl 2:B11-9
14580982
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jun;(279):299-302
1600668
J Biomech. 2010 Mar 3;43(4):792-5
19914623
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec;92 Suppl 2:12-22
21123589
J Biomech. 1999 Mar;32(3):255-66
10093025
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Jul;73(4):654-9
2071654
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Mar;24(3):156-62
20182251
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Aug;67(4):650-5
4030869
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Feb;24(2):203-9
19070409