Comparative population genetics of mimetic Heliconius butterflies in an endangered habitat; Brazil's Atlantic Forest.
BACKGROUND
Brazil's Atlantic Forest is a biodiversity hotspot endangered by severe habitat degradation and fragmentation. Habitat fragmentation is expected to reduce dispersal among habitat patches resulting in increased genetic differentiation among populations. Here we examined genetic diversity and differentiation among populations of two Heliconius butterfly species in the northern portion of Brazil's Atlantic Forest to estimate the potential impact of habitat fragmentation on population connectivity in butterflies with home-range behavior.


RESULTS
We generated microsatellite, AFLP and mtDNA sequence data for 136 Heliconius erato specimens from eight collecting locations and 146 H. melpomene specimens from seven locations. Population genetic analyses of the data revealed high levels of genetic diversity in H. erato relative to H. melpomene, widespread genetic differentiation among populations of both species, and no evidence for isolation-by-distance.


CONCLUSIONS
These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the extensive habitat fragmentation along Brazil's Atlantic Forest has reduced dispersal of Heliconius butterflies among neighboring habitat patches. The results also lend support to the observation that fine-scale population genetic structure may be common in Heliconius. If such population structure also exists independent of human activity, and has been common over the evolutionary history of Heliconius butterflies, it may have contributed to the evolution of wing pattern diversity in the genus.
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Priscila Albuquerque
PA
de Moura
Swee-Peck
SP
Quek
Márcio Z
MZ
Cardoso
Marcus R
MR
Kronforst
D000818:Animals; D001938:Brazil; D002080:Butterflies / Q000235:genetics*; D017753:Ecosystem; D014644:Genetic Variation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D014197:Trees
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 20;107(16):7365-70
20368448
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 29;101(26):9704-9
15210977
Biochem Genet. 1993 Oct;31(9-10):449-60
7907212
Mol Ecol. 2003 Jan;12(1):11-20
12492874
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Mar 7;275(1634):493-500
18077248
Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
19325852
Evolution. 1996 Feb;50(1):195-221
28568874
Mol Ecol. 2004 Feb;13(2):311-20
14717889
Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479-91
1644282
Mol Ecol. 1999 Sep;8(9):1539-43
10564461
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jun;14(7):1897-909
15910314
Curr Biol. 1996 Aug 1;6(8):937-40
8805315
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853-8
10706275
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):1924-8
287032
Oecologia. 1986 Jan;68(2):210-217
28310129
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2008 Dec;18(6):559-64
19135357
Evolution. 2002 Oct;56(10):1992-8
12449486
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Dec;19(12):2176-90
12446809
Mol Ecol. 1999 Sep;8(9):1481-95
10564454
Heredity (Edinb). 2001 Feb;86(Pt 2):243-50
11380670
Mol Ecol. 1999 Jun;8(6):907-13
10434412
Evolution. 1996 Oct;50(5):1990-1999
28565582
Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Apr;94(4):408-17
15592446