Coupling a genome-scale metabolic model with a reactive transport model to describe in situ uranium bioremediation.
The increasing availability of the genome sequences of microorganisms involved in important bioremediation processes makes it feasible to consider developing genome-scale models that can aid in predicting the likely outcome of potential subsurface bioremediation strategies. Previous studies of the in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater have demonstrated that Geobacter species are often the dominant members of the groundwater community during active bioremediation and the primary organisms catalysing U(VI) reduction. Therefore, a genome-scale, constraint-based model of the metabolism of Geobacter sulfurreducens was coupled with the reactive transport model HYDROGEOCHEM in an attempt to model in situ uranium bioremediation. In order to simplify the modelling, the influence of only three growth factors was considered: acetate, the electron donor added to stimulate U(VI) reduction; Fe(III), the electron acceptor primarily supporting growth of Geobacter; and ammonium, a key nutrient. The constraint-based model predicted that growth yields of Geobacter varied significantly based on the availability of these three growth factors and that there are minimum thresholds of acetate and Fe(III) below which growth and activity are not possible. This contrasts with typical, empirical microbial models that assume fixed growth yields and the possibility for complete metabolism of the substrates. The coupled genome-scale and reactive transport model predicted acetate concentrations and U(VI) reduction rates in a field trial of in situ uranium bioremediation that were comparable to the predictions of a calibrated conventional model, but without the need for empirical calibration, other than specifying the initial biomass of Geobacter. These results suggest that coupling genome-scale metabolic models with reactive transport models may be a good approach to developing models that can be truly predictive, without empirical calibration, for evaluating the probable response of subsurface microorganisms to possible bioremediation approaches prior to implementation.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO Box 999, MS K9-36, Richland, WA, USA. tim.scheibe@pnl.gov
Timothy D
TD
Scheibe
Radhakrishnan
R
Mahadevan
Yilin
Y
Fang
Srinath
S
Garg
Philip E
PE
Long
Derek R
DR
Lovley
D000085:Acetates / Q000378:metabolism; D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D001692:Biological Transport; D016680:Genome, Bacterial; D045302:Geobacter / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism*; D007501:Iron / Q000378:metabolism; D008954:Models, Biological; D014501:Uranium / Q000378:metabolism*
D000085:Acetates; D014501:Uranium; D007501:Iron
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Aug;59(8):2465-73
8368835
Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;7(5):641-8
15819846
Nat Genet. 2004 Oct;36(10):1056-8
15448692
ISME J. 2009 Apr;3(4):454-65
19129865
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003 Oct;1(1):35-44
15040178
Adv Microb Physiol. 2004;49:219-86
15518832
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1373-9
16346033
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Mar;58(3):850-6
1575486
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct;71(10):6308-18
16204552
Environ Microbiol. 2000 Jun;2(3):266-73
11200427
J Bacteriol. 2004 May;186(9):2897-9
15090532
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Nov;2(11):886-97
15494745
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):6870-7
16269721
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jun;73(12):3859-64
17468285
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 May;68(5):2300-6
11976101
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Feb;4(2):e36
18266464
ISME J. 2007 Dec;1(8):663-77
18059491
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;71(5):2530-8
15870343
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Feb;7(2):130-41
16418748
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1558-68
16461711
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Oct;69(10):5884-91
14532040
Nature. 2002 Nov 14;420(6912):186-9
12432395
Environ Microbiol. 2008 May;10(5):1218-30
18279349
Biophys J. 2002 Sep;83(3):1331-40
12202358
Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 15;24(18):2044-50
18621757
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Dec 1;39(23):9039-48
16382923
Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):454-6
11807560
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:149-66
16704344
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jun;26(6):659-67
18536691
Metab Eng. 2008 Sep;10(5):267-75
18644460
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001 Jun;12(3):248-53
11404102
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Jun;49(6):1530-1
16346820
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;74(12):3718-29
18456853
Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:92
17353934
J Contam Hydrol. 2007 Aug 15;93(1-4):216-35
17442451
Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:119
17625511
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jun 15;42(12):4384-90
18605559