Evolutionary patterns of two major reproduction candidate genes (Zp2 and Zp3) reveal no contribution to reproductive isolation between bovine species.
BACKGROUND
It has been established that mammalian egg zona pellucida (ZP) glycoproteins are responsible for species-restricted binding of sperm to unfertilized eggs, inducing the sperm acrosome reaction, and preventing polyspermy. In mammals, ZP apparently represents a barrier to heterospecific fertilization and thus probably contributes to reproductive isolation between species. The evolutionary relationships between some members of the tribe Bovini are complex and highly debatable, particularly, those involving Bos and Bison species for which interspecific hybridization is extensively documented. Because reproductive isolation is known to be a major precursor of species divergence, testing evolutionary patterns of ZP glycoproteins may shed some light into the speciation process of these species. To this end, we have examined intraspecific and interspecific genetic variation of two ZP genes (Zp2 and Zp3) for seven representative species (111 individuals) from the Bovini tribe, including five species from Bos and Bison, and two species each from genera Bubalus and Syncerus.


RESULTS
A pattern of low levels of intraspecific polymorphism and interspecific divergence was detected for the two sequenced fragments each for Zp2 and Zp3. At intraspecific level, none of neutrality tests detected deviations from neutral equilibrium expectations for the two genes. Several haplotypes in both genes were shared by multiple species from Bos and Bison.


CONCLUSIONS
Here we argue that neither ancestral polymorphism nor introgressive hybridization alone can fully account for haplotype sharing among species from Bos and Bison, and that both scenarios have contributed to such a pattern of haplotype sharing observed here. Additionally, codon-based tests revealed strong evidence for purifying selection in the Zp3 coding haplotype sequences and weak evidence for purifying selection in the Zp2 coding haplotype sequences. Contrary to a general genetic pattern that genes or genomic regions contributing to reproductive isolation between species often evolve rapidly and show little or no gene flow between species, these results demonstrate that, particularly, those sequenced exons of the Zp2 and the Zp3 did not show any contribution to reproductive isolation between the bovine species studied here.
Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos da Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.
Shanyuan
S
Chen
Vânia
V
Costa
Albano
A
Beja-Pereira
D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D004527:Egg Proteins / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D008562:Membrane Glycoproteins / Q000235:genetics*; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D010802:Phylogeny; D011110:Polymorphism, Genetic; D011956:Receptors, Cell Surface / Q000235:genetics*; D012098:Reproduction; D013045:Species Specificity; D000072216:Zona Pellucida Glycoproteins
D004527:Egg Proteins; D008562:Membrane Glycoproteins; D011956:Receptors, Cell Surface; D000072216:Zona Pellucida Glycoproteins
Heredity (Edinb). 2003 Dec;91(6):565-9
14508501
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Jan;16(1):37-48
10331250
J Cell Physiol. 2006 Apr;207(1):30-9
16245311
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Apr;68(4):978-89
11254454
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1586-91
17483113
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 3;92(1):263-7
7816829
Biochemistry. 1996 Apr 2;35(13):3980-5
8672430
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Feb;5(2):114-22
14735122
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Jul;81(1):44-52
17564962
Biol Reprod. 2008 May;78(5):796-806
18046012
Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585-95
2513255
Anim Genet. 2003 Apr;34(2):96-101
12648092
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 3;102 Suppl 1:6522-6
15851676
Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Nov;79(5):820-30
17033959
Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Feb;92(2):61-8
14666125
Reproduction. 2007 Apr;133(4):697-708
17504914
Nature. 2008 Dec 4;456(7222):653-7
19052627
Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):304-9
10659848
Dev Biol. 1988 Aug;128(2):376-85
3396765
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1451-2
19346325
Science. 2010 Jul 9;329(5988):216-9
20616279
Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405-13
10880498
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Sep;23(9):1656-69
16774977
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Feb;3(2):137-44
11836507
BMC Genomics. 2009 Apr 24;10:177
19393045
Genetics. 2004 Oct;168(2):1041-51
15514074
Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Jan;20(1):18-20
12519901
Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52(5-6):665-76
18649280
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Aug;48(2):387-95
18565767
Heredity (Edinb). 2003 Jan;90(1):10-6
12522420
Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:83-114
15952882
J Biol Chem. 2008 Sep 5;283(36):24285-9
18539589
Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19(5):940-51
20149093
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jun;17(11):2616-28
18466231
Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
19325852
Dev Biol. 1992 Dec;154(2):309-17
1330788
BMC Evol Biol. 2005 Nov 10;5:65
16283938
Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52(5-6):769-80
18649289
Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Sep;3(5):418-26
3444411
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Nov 22;274(1627):2849-55
17848372
Dev Cell. 2003 Jul;5(1):33-43
12852850
J Mol Evol. 2003 Mar;56(3):294-307
12612833
Dev Biol. 1980 Apr;76(1):185-202
7380091
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 27;98(5):2509-14
11226269
Genetics. 2005 Mar;169(3):1753-62
15654091
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817-8
9918953
Development. 2007 Mar;134(5):933-43
17293534
Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
12912839
Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1148-52
15760956
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9
17488738
Reproduction. 2004 Apr;127(4):417-22
15047932
Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Jan;102(1):66-76
19018273
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006 Dec;16(6):592-6
17055250
Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):693-709
8454210
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Nov;73(5):1162-9
14574645