"Do I really want to do this?" Longitudinal cohort study participants' perspectives on postal survey design: a qualitative study.
BACKGROUND
Randomised controlled trials have investigated aspects of postal survey design yet cannot elaborate on reasons behind participants' decision making and survey behaviour. This paper reports participants' perspectives of the design of, and participation in, a longitudinal postal cohort survey. It describes strengths and weaknesses in study design from the perspectives of study participants and aims to contribute to the: 1) design of future cohort surveys and questionnaires generally and, 2) design of cohort surveys for people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) specifically.


METHODS
In-depth interviews explored the design of postal surveys previously completed by participants. Interviews used open ended questioning with a topic guide for prompts if areas of interest were not covered spontaneously. Thematic data analysis was undertaken based on the framework method. A second researcher verified all coding.


RESULTS
Data from fourteen interviews were analysed within three main themes; participation, survey design and survey content. One of the main findings was the importance of clear communication aimed at the correct audience both when inviting potential participants to take part and within the survey itself. Providing enough information about the study, having a topic of interest and an explanation of likely benefits of the study were important when inviting people to participate. The neutrality of the survey and origination from a reputable source were both important; as was an explanation about why information was being collected within the survey itself. Study findings included participants' impressions when invited to take part, why they participated, the acceptability of follow-up of non-responders and why participants completed the follow-up postal survey. Also discussed were participants' first impression of the survey, its length, presentation and participants' views about specific questions within the survey.


CONCLUSIONS
Ideas generated in this study provide an insight into participants' decision making and survey behaviour and may enhance the acceptability of future surveys to potential participants. As well as clear communication, participants valued incentives and survey questions that were relevant to them. However, opinions varied as to the preferred format for responses with some advising more opportunity for open-ended feedback. We also found that some standard format questions can raise quandaries for individual participants.
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand. helen.harcombe@otago.ac.nz
Helen
H
Harcombe
Sarah
S
Derrett
Peter
P
Herbison
David
D
McBride
D000328:Adult; D001294:Attitude to Health; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009140:Musculoskeletal Diseases; D009520:New Zealand; D018579:Patient Selection; D011177:Postal Service; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012107:Research Design; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Feb 15;153(4):404-9
11207159
Soc Sci Med F. 1981 Sep;15(2-3):107-15
7313709
Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72
10158943
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Apr;14(2):226-35
18093103
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7
16731240
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug 18;5:55
16109160
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;25(1):31-52
14980747
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Apr;62(4):272-80, 212-4
15778263
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Mar;35(2):134-44
19308297
Inj Prev. 2010 Apr;16(2):96-100
20363815
Ethn Dis. 2004 Summer;14(3):423-30
15328945
Trials. 2010 Jan 11;11:2
20064225
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Oct;51(5):730-42
6630688
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jan 15;19(2):138-42
8153819
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):MR000008
19588449
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009 Oct;33(5):437-41
19811479