The list length effect in recognition memory: an analysis of potential confounds.
The list length effect in recognition memory refers to the finding that recognition performance for a short list is superior to that for a long list. The list length effect is consistent with the predictions of item noise models, but context noise models predict no effect. Recently, it has been argued that if potential confounds are controlled, the list length effect is eliminated. We report the results of two experiments in which we looked at the role of attention and the remember-know task in the detection of the list length effect. We conclude that there is no list length effect when potential confounds are controlled and that it is the design used to control for attention that is most vital.
School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. angela.kinnell@gmail.com
Angela
A
Kinnell
Simon
S
Dennis
D001288:Attention; D001290:Attitude; D006801:Humans; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D012691:Serial Learning
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Sep;17(5):855-74
1834768
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):800-7
15250785
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):1-21
16724763
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Mar;16(2):163-78
2137859
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 May;21(3):699-710
7602267
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Mar;117(1):34-50
2966230
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Mar;16(2):179-95
2137860
Psychol Rev. 1984 Jan;91(1):1-67
6571421
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):37-60
24214802
Mem Cognit. 1988 Jul;16(4):309-13
3210971
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Feb;61(2):218-26
17886194
Science. 1970 Jun 26;168(3939):1601-3
5420546
Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):452-78
11381837
Psychol Rev. 1955 May;62(3):145-54
14371893
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):112-27
18194058
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):524-42
15065921
Mem Cognit. 1974 Jan;2(1):14-8
24214692
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):906-26
18926982
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Nov;19(6):1445-9
8270891
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):145-66
21331823
Mem Cognit. 2007 Mar;35(2):365-71
17645177
Mem Cognit. 1983 May;11(3):307-15
6621346
Psychol Rev. 1998 Oct;105(4):724-60
9830377
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1284-97
15900922
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37
19293088