Context-specific social behavior is altered by orbitofrontal cortex lesions in adult rhesus macaques.
Although the orbitofrontal cortex has been implicated in important aspects of social behavior, few studies have evaluated semi-naturalistic social behavior in nonhuman primates after discrete lesions of this cortical area. In the present report, we evaluated the behavior of adult rhesus monkeys during dyadic social interactions with novel animals following discrete lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex. In a constrained condition, in which animals could engage in only restricted social behaviors, there were no significant differences in social behavior between the lesion group and the sham-operated control group. When the experimental animals could freely interact with partner animals, however, lesioned animals differed from control animals in terms of social interest and fear-related behaviors. These alterations were contingent on the partner with which they interacted. The lesioned animals, when compared to the control animals, had a significantly greater propensity to approach some but not all of their social partners. They also grimaced more towards the partner animal that they did not approach. Behavioral alterations were more apparent during the initial interactions between animals. We discuss these findings in relation to the role of the orbitofrontal cortex in context dependent modulation of social behavior.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
B A
BA
Babineau
E
E
Bliss-Moreau
C J
CJ
Machado
J E
JE
Toscano
W A
WA
Mason
D G
DG
Amaral
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000293:injuries / Q000502:physiology*; D008253:Macaca mulatta; D012919:Social Behavior
Neuron. 2002 Jul 18;35(2):395-405
12160756
J Comp Psychol. 1985 Jun;99(2):133-44
4040002
Psychosom Med. 1952 Sep-Oct;14(5):406-15
12993946
Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):206-19
10731217
Prog Neurobiol. 2004 Apr;72(5):341-72
15157726
Neurocase. 2008;14(6):474-9
19012167
Mol Psychiatry. 2002;7(10):1058-63
12476320
Behav Neurosci. 2008 Apr;122(2):251-66
18410164
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jun;55(1):30-40
15134841
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000 Feb;32(1):197-206
10758678
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 Sep;72(3):452-61
4988978
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 1997;104(11-12):1259-66
9503271
Northwest Med Surg J. 1849 Feb-Mar;1(6):513-518
37319500
Exp Neurol. 1981 Aug;73(2):378-89
7262243
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Dec;10(12):885-92
19904278
Curr Biol. 2007 May 1;17(9):766-72
17412586
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Dec;1121:546-61
17698998
Neuropsychologia. 1973 May;11(2):141-57
4197348
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):594-604
14561114
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Mar;4(3):165-78
12612630
Brain. 2003 Jul;126(Pt 7):1691-712
12805109
Dev Psychopathol. 2007 Fall;19(4):977-87
17931429
Behav Neurosci. 2001 Jun;115(3):515-44
11439444
Brain Res. 1973 Dec 21;64:257-69
4205547
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):159-65
18639633
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1671-83
17093126
Neuroimage. 2004 Oct;23(2):744-51
15488424
Behav Neurosci. 2006 Aug;120(4):761-86
16893284
Neurology. 1985 Dec;35(12):1731-41
4069365
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Dec;1121:254-72
17872386
Exp Neurol. 1979 Oct;66(1):158-68
113236
Neuropsychologia. 1996 Apr;34(4):247-61
8657356
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jun;18(6):871-9
16839295
Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227-67
4597405