Determinants of lemming outbreaks.
Population outbreaks in tundra rodents have intrigued scientists for a century as a result of their spectacular appearances and their general lessons in ecology. One outstanding question that has led to competing hypotheses is why sympatric lemmings and voles differ in regularity and shape of their outbreaks. Lemming outbreaks may be lost for decades while vole populations maintain regular population cycles. Moreover, when lemming populations eventually irrupt, they do so more steeply than the vole populations. Norwegian lemmings exhibited a large-scale outbreak synchronously with gray-sided voles in Finnmark, northern Fennoscandia, during 2006 to 2007 for the first time in two decades. Analyses of spatial variability of this outbreak across altitudinal gradients allowed us to identify determinants of the contrasting lemming and vole dynamics. The steeper lemming outbreak trajectories were caused by breeding and population growth during winter, when nonbreeding vole populations consistently declined. The differently shaped lemming and vole outbreaks appear to result from a particular demographic tactic of lemmings that evolved as an adaptation to the long and cold Arctic-Alpine winters. The lemming outbreak amplitude increased with altitude and vole density, indicating that lemming outbreaks are jointly facilitated by low temperatures and apparent mutualism with voles mediated by shared predators. High sensitivity to variation in climate and predation is likely to be the reasons why lemmings have more erratic population dynamics than sympatric voles. The combination of continued climatic warming and dampened vole cycles is expected to further decrease the frequency, amplitude, and geographic range of lemming outbreaks in tundra ecosystems.
Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway. rolf.ims@uit.no
Rolf A
RA
Ims
Nigel G
NG
Yoccoz
Siw T
ST
Killengreen
D000818:Animals; D003411:Arvicolinae / Q000502:physiology*; D011158:Population Growth
Science. 2003 Oct 31;302(5646):797-8
14593159
J Anim Ecol. 2010 May;79(3):701-8
20233259
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 30;100(20):11478-83
14504382
Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):43-4
18987726
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 22;278(1705):481-9
20980307
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 2;96(3):986-91
9927680
Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):93-7
18987742
Nature. 2000 Jun 1;405(6786):562-5
10850713
Science. 2010 Jan 15;327(5963):276-7
20075236
J Anim Ecol. 2009 May;78(3):636-45
19040680
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Feb;23(2):79-86
18191281
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 23;107(47):20576-81
21059922