Working memory capacity modulates task performance but has little influence on task choice.
Variation in the ability to maintain internal goals while resolving competition from multiple information streams has been related to individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC). In a multitask environment, task choice and task performance are influenced by internal goals, prior behavior within the environment, and the availability of relevant and irrelevant information in the environment. Using the voluntary task-switching procedure, task performance, as measured by switch costs, was related to WMC, but only at short preparation intervals. Task choice processes were only weakly related to WMC. These findings are consistent with models of cognitive control that separate task choice processes from the processes of activating and maintaining task readiness. WMC is related to regulation of specific task parameters but not to choice processes integral to the coordination of multiple sources of information.
Department of Psychology, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA. kmbutler@unm.edu
Karin M
KM
Butler
Catherine M
CM
Arrington
Christina
C
Weywadt
D000293:Adolescent; D001076:Aptitude; D001288:Attention; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D056344:Executive Function; D005260:Female; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D012193:Reversal Learning; D014706:Verbal Learning; D055815:Young Adult
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):104-32
17227183
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Apr;63(4):726-37
19760536
Psychophysiology. 2010 Nov;47(6):1176-81
20456659
Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):602-39
18729594
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Mar;129(1):4-26
10756484
Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):393-434
11381835
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;14(3):340-7
11970796
Cogn Psychol. 2007 Aug;55(1):37-85
17078941
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):991-7
18630205
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Jun;29(3):575-99
12848327
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 May;62(5):850-7
19132632
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):218-36
15149251
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):169-83
11409097
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1124-40
11009248
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):641-57
11757873
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 May;136(2):217-40
17500647
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):478-94
18444750
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
10945922
Cogn Psychol. 2002 May;44(3):297-337
11971634
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):1060-7
20565222
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Feb;17(1):1-14
20081154
Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):153-63
15078052
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1111-6
19001576
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):331-5
11495122
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):387-93
20551363
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):348-62
20192535
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):660-5
19648449
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):840-5
18087947
Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):221-33
16028577
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jul;31(4):683-702
16060773
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):343-67
16131268
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):134-140
12639695
Psychol Sci. 2004 Sep;15(9):610-5
15327632
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):47-70
12656297
Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):774-80
16984294
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):769-86
16523997
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):484-502
17470002
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1998 Nov;51(4):819-52
9854442
Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):601-26
20565170
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):749-77
16822145
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jul;31(5):781-9
12956242
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 May;29(3):362-72
12776747