title: Naive misconceptions of Cooke and Breedin's research: response to Ranney.
abstract: In this paper, we respond to Ranney's (1994) comment on our paper on naive physics (Cooke & Breedin, 1994). In his comment, Ranney criticizes our methods and analyses, as well as our claims of theoretical inconsistency. In response to Ranney, we show that mast of his criticisms can be traced to several misconceptions. Some of these misconceptions seem to stem from his drawing of inappropriate similarities between his own research and ours. Specifically, ftanney seems to hall faun' misconceptions about our research: (1) the belief that trajectory responses in our study were relevant to our claims about theoretical consistency, (2) tie belief that aggregation of theoretical variations weakens claims of inconsistency, (3) the belief that the method of written reports is inferior to the method of structured interviews, and (4) the belief that our proposal of on-the-fly theorizing is at odds with temporal consistency and nonimpetus beliefs.
authors.affiliation: Departinent of Psychology, New Mexicu State Uneversity, P O Box 30001/3452, 88003, Las Cruceti, NM.
authors.forename: N J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Cooke
authors.forename: S D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Breedin