title: Gastric cancer surgery: an American perspective on the current options and standards.
abstract: Gastric cancer is prevalent globally, particularly in Asian countries such as Japan and Korea. While the prevalence of gastric cancer is not nearly as high in the United States (U.S.) as in Asia, the treatment armamentarium differs widely between regions. The role of surgery for gastric cancer in the U.S. has changed drastically over the last decade. While the natural history of gastric cancer seen in the U.S. markedly differs from that seen in Asia, the U.S. experience with endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques is beginning to parallel those seen in Japan and Korea. Minimally invasive surgery has truly come into the forefront of our surgical armamentarium, and its role, along with robotic and endoscopic approaches, remains to be defined as standard of care. At present, minimally invasive approaches appear to offer oncologically equivalent outcomes compared with standard open gastrectomy when performed by experienced surgeons. Extended lymphadenectomy does not appear to offer benefit with improved survival in our patient population, although sufficient lymph node sampling is imperative for adequate staging. Despite aggressive approaches to surgical resection for cure, the U.S. population tends to present with more advanced disease and have a worse prognosis than our Asian counterparts. Palliation with resection and possibly stent placement should be offered for improved quality of life in late-stage disease.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
authors.forename: Joyce
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.forename: Patrick
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Jackson
mesh_terms: D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D005743:Gastrectomy; D006801:Humans; D011379:Prognosis; D059039:Standard of Care; D013274:Stomach Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D014481:United States