title: Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing.
abstract: Lavie and Tsal (1994) proposed that spare attentional capacity is allocated involuntarily to the processing of irrelevant stimuli, thereby enabling interference. Under this view, when task demands increase, spare capacity should decrease and distractor interference should decrease. In support, Lavie and Cox (1997) found that increasing perceptual load by increasing search set size decreased interference from an irrelevant distractor. In three experiments, we manipulated the cue set size (number of cued locations) independently of the display set size (number of letters presented). Increasing the display set size reduced distractor interference regardless of whether the additional letters were relevant to the task. In contrast, increasing the cue set size increased distractor interference. Both findings are inconsistent with the load explanation, but are consistent with a proposed two-stage dilution account.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch Street, Humphrey Hall, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada. daryl.wilson@queensu.ca
authors.forename: Daryl E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Wilson
authors.forename: Miya
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Muroi
authors.forename: Colin M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: MacLeod
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011930:Reaction Time; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014796:Visual Perception