title: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: choice of the year: which imaging modality is best for evaluation of myocardial ischemia? (MRI-side).
abstract: The increasing variety of available cardiac imaging techniques have made the investigation of coronary artery disease more complex. On the one hand, nuclear cardiology or myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) allows accurate and reliable quantitative measurement of myocardial blood flow. On the other hand, a newer technique, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an attractive alternative for achieving similar purposes without exposing patients to radiation hazards. With a higher spatial resolution, CMR is more sensitive for detecting subendocardial ischemia; small myocardial infarction and/or fibrosis, which cannot be achieved in a nuclear study. Nuclear MPI has dominated clinical practice over the past 3 decades on the basis of an extensive amount of research. More upcoming research on CMR would warrant more evidence-based data of its value for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk stratification and incorporating it into the clinical diagnostic and management algorithm.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, HKSAR, China.
authors.forename: Stephen C W
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Cheung
authors.forename: Carmen W S
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Chan
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000473:pathology; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000150:complications / Q000473:pathology*; D055414:Myocardial Perfusion Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D011379:Prognosis; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity