title: Form and deformity: the trouble with Victorian pockets.
abstract: This essay explores the Victorian debate about the place of pockets in men's and women's clothing. By studying the representation of men as naturally pocketed creatures and the general denial of useful pockets to middle-class women, the essay demonstrates the tenacious cultural logic by which men's and women's pockets were imagined to correspond to sexual differences and to index access, or lack thereof, to public mobility and financial agency. Interconnected readings of visual art, essays, and novels show how the common sense about gendered pockets was utilized and promulgated in Victorian narratives. The question of who gets pockets is thus positioned as part of the history of gendered bodies in public space.
authors.affiliation: Washington and Lee Univ.
authors.forename: Christopher Todd
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Matthews
mesh_terms: D003020:Clothing / Q000191:economics / Q000266:history / Q000523:psychology; D003466:Cultural Characteristics / Q000266:history; D005783:Gender Identity; D049672:History, 19th Century; D007398:Interpersonal Relations / Q000266:history; D008571:Men / Q000193:education / Q000523:psychology; D054526:Men's Health / Q000208:ethnology / Q000266:history; D019529:Sexuality / Q000208:ethnology / Q000266:history / Q000502:physiology / Q000523:psychology; D012924:Social Conditions / Q000191:economics / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012925:Social Conformity; D012937:Social Mobility / Q000191:economics / Q000266:history; D013561:Symbolism; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000208:ethnology; D014930:Women / Q000193:education / Q000266:history / Q000523:psychology; D016387:Women's Health / Q000208:ethnology / Q000266:history; D014933:Women's Rights / Q000191:economics / Q000193:education / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence