title: What was really synthesized during the evolutionary synthesis? A historiographic proposal.
abstract: The 1920-1960 period saw the creation of the conditions for a unification of disciplines in the area of evolutionary biology under a limited number of theoretical prescriptions: the evolutionary synthesis. Whereas the sociological dimension of this synthesis was fairly successful, it was surprisingly loose when it came to the interpretation of the evolutionary mechanisms per se, and completely lacking at the level of the foundational epistemological and metaphysical commitments. Key figures such as Huxley, Simpson, Dobzhansky, and Rensch only paid lip service to the conceptual dimension of the evolutionary synthesis, as they eventually realized that a number of evolutionary phenomena could not be explained by its narrow theoretical corpus. Apparently, the evolutionary synthesis constituted a premature event in the development of evolutionary biology. Not only are the real achievements of the evolutionary synthesis in need of reevaluation, but this reassessment also has important implications for the historiography of Darwinism and the current debates about the darwinian movement.
authors.affiliation: Philosophy and Liberal Education, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. richard.delisle@uleth.ca
authors.forename: Richard G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Delisle
mesh_terms: D005075:Biological Evolution; D001695:Biology / Q000266:history; D006663:Historiography; D049673:History, 20th Century; D019359:Knowledge; D008678:Metaphysics / Q000266:history*