title: Adaptation as process: the future of Darwinism and the legacy of Theodosius Dobzhansky.
abstract: Conceptions of adaptation have varied in the history of genetic Darwinism depending on whether what is taken to be focal is the process of adaptation, adapted states of populations, or discrete adaptations in individual organisms. I argue that Theodosius Dobzhansky's view of adaptation as a dynamical process contrasts with so-called "adaptationist" views of natural selection figured as "design-without-a-designer" of relatively discrete, enumerable adaptations. Correlated with these respectively process and product oriented approaches to adaptive natural selection are divergent pictures of organisms themselves as developmental wholes or as "bundles" of adaptations. While even process versions of genetical Darwinism are insufficiently sensitive to the fact much of the variation on which adaptive selection works consists of changes in the timing, rate, or location of ontogenetic events, I argue that articulations of the Modern Synthesis influenced by Dobzhansky are more easily reconciled with the recent shift to evolutionary developmentalism than are versions that make discrete adaptations central.
authors.affiliation: Project on the Rhetoric of Inquiry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. david-depew@uiowa.edu
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Depew
mesh_terms: D000220:Adaptation, Biological; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001695:Biology / Q000266:history; D015509:Developmental Biology; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D005823:Genetics / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D014481:United States