title: Utopianism in the British evolutionary synthesis.
abstract: In this paper I propose a new interpretation of the British evolutionary synthesis. The synthetic work of J. B. S. Haldane, R. A. Fisher and J. S. Huxley was characterized by both an integration of Mendelism and Darwinism and the unification of different biological subdisciplines within a coherent framework. But it must also be seen as a bold and synthetic Darwinian program in which the biosciences served as a utopian blueprint for the progress of civilization. Describing the futuristic visions of these three scientists in their synthetic heydays, I show that, despite a number of important divergences, their biopolitical ideals could be biased toward a controlled and regimented utopian society. Their common ideals entailed a social order where liberal and democratic principles were partially or totally suspended in favor of bioscientific control and planning for the future. Finally, I will argue that the original redefinition of Darwinism that modern synthesizers proposed is a significant historical example of how Darwinism has been used and adapted in different contexts. The lesson I draw from this account is a venerable one: that, whenever we wish to define Darwinism, we need to recognize not only its scientific content and achievements but expose the other traditions and ideologies it may have supported.
authors.affiliation: Centre for the History and Philosophy of Science, Department of Philosophy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. phem@leeds.ac.uk
authors.forename: Maurizio
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Esposito
mesh_terms: D005075:Biological Evolution; D001695:Biology / Q000266:history; D002962:Civilization / Q000266:history*; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D006113:United Kingdom; D014601:Utopias / Q000266:history*