title: Performance of reclassification statistics in comparing risk prediction models.
abstract: Concerns have been raised about the use of traditional measures of model fit in evaluating risk prediction models for clinical use, and reclassification tables have been suggested as an alternative means of assessing the clinical utility of a model. Several measures based on the table have been proposed, including the reclassification calibration (RC) statistic, the net reclassification improvement (NRI), and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), but the performance of these in practical settings has not been fully examined. We used simulations to estimate the type I error and power for these statistics in a number of scenarios, as well as the impact of the number and type of categories, when adding a new marker to an established or reference model. The type I error was found to be reasonable in most settings, and power was highest for the IDI, which was similar to the test of association. The relative power of the RC statistic, a test of calibration, and the NRI, a test of discrimination, varied depending on the model assumptions. These tools provide unique but complementary information.
authors.affiliation: Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. ncook@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
authors.forename: Nancy R
authors.initials: NR
authors.lastname: Cook
authors.forename: Nina P
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Paynter
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002138:Calibration; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011336:Probability; D012372:ROC Curve; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012306:Risk; D013223:Statistics as Topic