title: Sex differences in error-related performance monitoring.
abstract: We tested competing hypotheses for sex differences in performance monitoring using the error-related negativity and the posterror positivity components of the event-related potential (ERP). High-density ERPs were acquired while 100 female and 98 male partcipants completed a flanker task. Sexes did not differ in accuracy or posterror slowing, although females showed longer overall response times. Males showed increased amplitude error-related negativity and posterror positivity components relative to females; sexes did not differ on correct-trial ERPs. Sex differences remained in subgroups matched for depression and anxiety levels. Results indicate that participant sex should be considered in understanding the cognitive and emotional correlates of performance monitoring.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA. michael_larson@byu.edu
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Larson
authors.forename: Mikle
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: South
authors.forename: Peter E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Clayson
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D055815:Young Adult