title: Are survival processing memory advantages based on ancestral priorities?
abstract: Recent research has suggested that our memory systems are especially tuned to process information according to its survival relevance, and that inducing problems of "ancestral priorities" faced by our ancestors should lead to optimal recall performance (Nairne & Pandeirada, Cognitive Psychology, 2010). The present study investigated the specificity of this idea by comparing an ancestor-consistent scenario and a modern survival scenario that involved threats that were encountered by human ancestors (e.g., predators) or threats from fictitious creatures (i.e., zombies). Participants read one of four survival scenarios in which the environment and the explicit threat were either consistent or inconsistent with ancestrally based problems (i.e., grasslands-predators, grasslands-zombies, city-attackers, city-zombies), or they rated words for pleasantness. After rating words based on their survival relevance (or pleasantness), the participants performed a free recall task. All survival scenarios led to better recall than did pleasantness ratings, but recall was greater when zombies were the threat, as compared to predators or attackers. Recall did not differ for the modern (i.e., city) and ancestral (i.e., grasslands) scenarios. These recall differences persisted when valence and arousal ratings for the scenarios were statistically controlled as well. These data challenge the specificity of ancestral priorities in survival-processing advantages in memory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876, USA. nicholas.soderstrom@colostate.edu
authors.forename: Nicholas C
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Soderstrom
authors.forename: David P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: McCabe
mesh_terms: D005075:Biological Evolution; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D013534:Survival / Q000523:psychology*; D055815:Young Adult