title: Are visual features of a looming or receding object processed in a capacity-free manner?
abstract: Numerous experiments have examined whether moving stimuli capture spatial attention but none have sought to determine whether visual features of looming and receding objects are extracted in a capacity-free manner. The current experiment (N=28) used the task-choice procedure originated by Besner and Care (2003) to examine this possibility. Stimuli were presented in 3D space by manipulating retinal disparity. Results indicate that features of an object are extracted in a capacity-free manner for both looming and receding objects for participants who consciously perceive motion but not for participants who do not consciously perceive motion. These results suggest that the cognitive system is biased to process potentially animate objects, perhaps because of the evolutionary advantage this cognitive ability may provide.
authors.affiliation: Bates College, 2Andrews Road, Lewiston, ME 04240-6028, USA. tkahan@bates.edu
authors.forename: Todd A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Kahan
authors.forename: Sean M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Colligan
authors.forename: John N
authors.initials: JN
authors.lastname: Wiedman
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D004215:Distance Perception; D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011930:Reaction Time; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis