title: Does it matter whether investigators intend to benefit research subjects?
abstract: There has been long-standing, albeit largely implicit, debate over whether investigator intentions are relevant to the ethical appropriateness of clinical research. Some commentators argue that whether investigators intend to collect generalizable knowledge or to benefit subjects is central to the ethics of clinical research. Others do not even mention investigator intentions when evaluating what makes clinical research ethical. To shed light on this debate, the present paper considers the reasons why investigator intentions might be ethically relevant. This analysis reveals that investigator intentions are related to, but distinct from three ethical requirements: whether subjects understand that they are contributing to a project to help others, whether the included interventions have an appropriate risk/benefit ratio, and whether subjects' interests are adequately protected. Provided these three requirements are satisfied, the ethical appropriateness of clinical research does not depend on what intentions investigators have in conducting it.
authors.affiliation: Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wendler
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Abdoler
mesh_terms: D026686:Beneficence; D032882:Comprehension; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006805:Human Experimentation / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D008495:Medical Oncology / Q000941:ethics; D033281:Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation / Q000941:ethics; D010372:Pediatrics / Q000941:ethics; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000941:ethics*; D035842:Research Subjects; D035844:Researcher-Subject Relations / Q000941:ethics*; D012306:Risk; D036302:Therapeutic Human Experimentation / Q000941:ethics