title: The comparative usefulness of orthostatic testing and tilt table testing in the evaluation of autonomic-associated dizziness.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To elucidate the usefulness of clinical orthostatic blood pressure testing (COBP) as a screening tool for autonomic dysfunction.
  
  
  METHODS
  In this retrospective case review, the records of 156 consecutive patients with nonotologic dizziness as the primary complaint seen in an academic neurotology clinic between 2005 and 2009 were reviewed. The objective of this study was accomplished by comparing the diagnostic yield of COBP with that of head-upright tilt table testing (HUT) and assessing the sensitivity and specificity of COBP in predicting an abnormal HUT in patients with nonotologic dizziness.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ambulatory tertiary referral center.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients presenting to the clinic with dizziness without otologic cause.
  
  
  METHODS
  Clinical evaluation, orthostatic blood pressure testing, and HUT.
  
  
  METHODS
  The primary outcome assessed in this study was patient blood pressure. Blood pressures were measured in the clinic in the following order: supine, sitting, and standing. Positive COBP was defined as a reduction in systolic or diastolic blood pressure greater than 20 or 10 mm Hg, respectively, or both, within 3 minutes of sitting from supine or standing from sitting. For comparison, HUT was used as the gold standard. A positive HUT was defined as a reduction in systolic or diastolic blood pressure greater than 20 or 10 mm Hg, respectively, or both, relative to baseline at any point after initiation of HUT.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty patients were referred for HUT. Twenty-four (61.5%) of these patients were deemed to have a positive response. Thirty-three patients (85%) referred to HUT were initially evaluated with COBP, which revealed orthostatic hypotension (OH) in 8 patients (24%). COBP was calculated to have sensitivity and specificity of 21% and 71%, respectively, when asymptomatic OH was included in the positivity criteria. When asymptomatic OH was excluded from the positivity criteria, the sensitivity and specificity remained similar at 25% and 76%, respectively. However, the exclusion of asymptomatic OH from the positivity criteria resulted in a decrease in the positive predictive value from 50% to 25% and an increase in the negative predictive value from 40% to 76%. Overall, HUT detected 16 patients with an abnormal result that were missed by COBP testing.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Evaluation for autonomic dysfunction should be part of the comprehensive evaluation of a dizzy patient, involving, at a minimum, orthostatic testing of blood pressure and heart rate. Patients with nonotologic dizziness and light-headedness with a normal neurotologic evaluation can reasonably be referred for HUT, even in the presence of normal in-office orthostatic testing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
authors.forename: Farhoud
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Faraji
authors.forename: Laurence J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Kinsella
authors.forename: Joseph C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Rutledge
authors.forename: Anthony A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Mikulec
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001341:Autonomic Nervous System / Q000503:physiopathology; D001342:Autonomic Nervous System Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000502:physiology*; D004244:Dizziness / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007024:Hypotension, Orthostatic / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D018667:Tilt-Table Test