title: A review of clinical data for currently approved hysteroscopic sterilization procedures.
abstract: TWO HYSTEROSCOPIC PERMANENT STERILIZATION PROCEDURES ARE APPROVED FOR USE IN THE UNITED STATES: Essure® Permanent Birth Control System (Conceptus Incorporated, Mountain View, CA) and Adiana® Permanent Contraception (Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA). This review compares the clinical trial data for these procedures. A notable difference is the resultant clinical pregnancy risk. The clinical trials for the Essure procedure have reported no pregnancies in 643 relying women in the 9 years since initiation of the studies. The clinical trial for the Adiana procedure has reported 12 pregnancies in 570 relying women in nearly 5 years of collected data. Other clinical outcome parameters concerning Essure and Adiana are examined in this review.
authors.affiliation: Basinski, LLC Newburgh, IN.
authors.forename: Cindy M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Basinski