title: Evaluation of spectrophotometric and HPLC methods for shikimic acid determination in plants: models in glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible crops.
abstract: Endogenous shikimic acid determinations are routinely used to assess the efficacy of glyphosate in plants. Numerous analytical methods exist in the public domain for the detection of shikimic acid, yet the most commonly cited comprise spectrophotometric and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. This paper compares an HPLC and two spectrophotometric methods (Spec 1 and Spec 2) and assesses the effectiveness in the detection of shikimic acid in the tissues of glyphosate-treated plants. Furthermore, the study evaluates the versatility of two acid-based shikimic acid extraction methods and assesses the longevity of plant extract samples under different storage conditions. Finally, Spec 1 and Spec 2 are further characterized with respect to (1) the capacity to discern between shikimic acid and chemically related alicyclic hydroxy acids, (2) the stability of the chromophore (t1/2), (3) the detection limits, and (4) the cost and simplicity of undertaking the analytical procedure. Overall, spectrophotometric methods were more cost-effective and simpler to execute yet provided a narrower detection limit compared to HPLC. All three methods were specific to shikimic acid and detected the compound in the tissues of glyphosate-susceptible crops, increasing exponentially in concentration within 24 h of glyphosate application and plateauing at approximately 72 h. Spec 1 estimated more shikimic acid in identical plant extract samples compared to Spec 2 and, likewise, HPLC detection was more effective than spectrophotometric determinations. Given the unprecedented global adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops and concomitant use of glyphosate, an effective and accurate assessment of glyphosate efficacy is important. Endogenous shikimic acid determinations are instrumental in corroborating the efficacy of glyphosate and therefore have numerous applications in herbicide research and related areas of science as well as resolving many commercial issues as a consequence of glyphosate utilization.
authors.affiliation: Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-1011, USA. ian.zelaya@syngenta.com
authors.forename: Ian A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Zelaya
authors.forename: Jennifer A H
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.forename: Micheal D K
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Owen
authors.forename: Reid D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Landes
mesh_terms: D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D018556:Crops, Agricultural / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000187:drug effects; D005998:Glycine / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000494:pharmacology; D053209:Herbicide Resistance; D006540:Herbicides / Q000494:pharmacology; D008954:Models, Biological; D010936:Plant Extracts / Q000032:analysis*; D012765:Shikimic Acid / Q000032:analysis*; D013053:Spectrophotometry / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D000097797:Glyphosate
chemical_list: D005998:Glycine; D006540:Herbicides; D010936:Plant Extracts; D012765:Shikimic Acid; D000097797:Glyphosate