title: Mitigating the consequences of extreme events on strategic facilities: evaluation of volcanic and seismic risk affecting the Caspian oil and gas pipelines in the Republic of Georgia.
abstract: In this work we identify and quantify new seismic and volcanic risks threatening the strategic Caspian oil and gas pipelines through the Republic of Georgia, in the vicinity of the recent Abuli Samsari Volcanic Ridge, and evaluate risk reduction measures, mitigation measures, and monitoring. As regards seismic risk, we identified a major, NW-SE trending strike-slip fault; based on the analysis of fault planes along this major transcurrent structure, an about N-S trend of the maximum, horizontal compressive stress (σ1) was determined, which is in good agreement with data instrumentally derived after the 1986, M 5.6 Paravani earthquake and its aftershock. Particularly notable is the strong alignment of volcanic vents along an about N-S trend that suggests a magma rising controlled by the about N-S-directed σ1. The original pipeline design included mitigation measures for seismic risk and other geohazards, including burial of the pipeline for its entire length, increased wall thickness, block valve spacing near recognized hazards, and monitoring of known landslide hazards. However, the design did not consider volcanic risk or the specific seismic hazards revealed by this study. The result of our analysis is that the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline, as well as the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzerum South Caucasian natural gas pipeline (SCP) were designed in such a way that they significantly reduce the risk posed by the newly-identified geohazards in the vicinity of the Abuli-Samsari Ridge. No new measures are recommended for the pipeline itself as a result of this study. However, since the consequences of long-term shut-down would be very damaging to the economies of Western Europe, we conclude that the regionally significant BTC and SCP warrant greater protections, described in the final section of or work. The overall objective of our effort is to present the results in a matrix framework that allows the technical information to be used further in the decision-making process, with the goal of reducing the uncertainty in the final decision. This approach is applicable to the study of risks in other pipeline systems.
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemical and Environmental Sciences, Insubria University, Como, Italy. federico.pasquare@uninsubria.it
authors.forename: F A
authors.initials: FA
authors.lastname: Pasquarè
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Tormey
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Vezzoli
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Okrostsvaridze
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Tutberidze
mesh_terms: D055866:Earthquakes; D019652:Extraction and Processing Industry / Q000379:methods*; D005579:Fossil Fuels; D005843:Geography; D005846:Georgia (Republic); D018570:Risk Assessment; D014186:Transportation / Q000379:methods*; D018707:Volcanic Eruptions
chemical_list: D005579:Fossil Fuels