title: Is qualitative research second class science? A quantitative longitudinal examination of qualitative research in medical journals.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Qualitative research appears to be gaining acceptability in medical journals. Yet, little is actually known about the proportion of qualitative research and factors affecting its publication. This study describes the proportion of qualitative research over a 10 year period and correlates associated with its publication.
  
  
  METHODS
  A quantitative longitudinal examination of the proportion of original qualitative research in 67 journals of general medicine during a 10 year period (1998-2007). The proportion of qualitative research was determined by dividing original qualitative studies published (numerator) by all original research articles published (denominator). We used a generalized estimating equations approach to assess the longitudinal association between the proportion of qualitative studies and independent variables (i.e. journals' country of publication and impact factor; editorial/methodological papers discussing qualitative research; and specific journal guidelines pertaining to qualitative research).
  
  
  RESULTS
  A 2.9% absolute increase and 3.4-fold relative increase in qualitative research publications occurred over a 10 year period (1.2% in 1998 vs. 4.1% in 2007). The proportion of original qualitative research was independently and significantly associated with the publication of editorial/methodological papers in the journal (b = 3.688, P = 0.012); and with qualitative research specifically mentioned in guidelines for authors (b = 6.847, P<0.001). Additionally, a higher proportion of qualitative research was associated only with journals published in the UK in comparison to other countries, yet with borderline statistical significance (b = 1.776, P = 0.075). The journals' impact factor was not associated with the publication of qualitative research.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite an increase in the proportion of qualitative research in medical journals over a 10 year period, the proportion remains low. Journals' policies pertaining to qualitative research, as expressed by the appearance of specific guidelines and editorials/methodological papers on the subject, are independently associated with the publication of original qualitative research; irrespective of the journals' impact factor.
authors.affiliation: School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America. kerem.shuval@UTSouthwestern.edu
authors.forename: Kerem
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Shuval
authors.forename: Karen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Harker
authors.forename: Bahman
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Roudsari
authors.forename: Nora E
authors.initials: NE
authors.lastname: Groce
authors.forename: Britain
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Mills
authors.forename: Zoveen
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Siddiqi
authors.forename: Aviv
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Shachak
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D055811:Journal Impact Factor; D018156:Journalism, Medical / Q000592:standards*; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D011642:Publications / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011643:Publishing / Q000145:classification* / Q000592:standards*; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D012196:Review Literature as Topic; D012586:Science / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards; D006113:United Kingdom; D014481:United States