title: Artificial nutrition and hydration: the evolution of ethics, evidence, and policy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The debate over use of artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in terminal illness, including advanced dementia, remains contentious despite extensive ethical and empirical investigation.
  
  
  METHODS
  For this narrative review we undertook a focused, selective review of literature reflecting ethical analysis, empirical assessment of outcomes, legal responses, and thinking within the Roman Catholic religious tradition.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The history of the debate over the past 60 years results from a complex interplay of ethical concerns, a growing empirical database, legal changes, public opinion, and financial as well as institutional concerns. Discussions of ANH today are often conducted without any understanding of this historical context.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients' interests could be better protected through remedial action at both the individual and the policy levels.
authors.affiliation: Institute for the Medical Humanities, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-1311, USA. habrody@utmb.edu
authors.forename: Howard
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Brody
authors.forename: Laura D
authors.initials: LD
authors.lastname: Hermer
authors.forename: Larry D
authors.initials: LD
authors.lastname: Scott
authors.forename: L Lee
authors.initials: LL
authors.lastname: Grumbles
authors.forename: Julie E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Kutac
authors.forename: Susan D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: McCammon
mesh_terms: D002410:Catholicism; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005440:Fluid Therapy / Q000941:ethics* / Q000639:trends; D006291:Health Policy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D018529:Nutritional Support / Q000941:ethics* / Q000639:trends; D010166:Palliative Care / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000639:trends