title: Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality.
abstract: Social dominance theory (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) contends that institutional-level mechanisms exist that reinforce and perpetuate existing group-based inequalities, but very few such mechanisms have been empirically demonstrated. We propose that gendered wording (i.e., masculine- and feminine-themed words, such as those associated with gender stereotypes) may be a heretofore unacknowledged, institutional-level mechanism of inequality maintenance. Employing both archival and experimental analyses, the present research demonstrates that gendered wording commonly employed in job recruitment materials can maintain gender inequality in traditionally male-dominated occupations. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated the existence of subtle but systematic wording differences within a randomly sampled set of job advertisements. Results indicated that job advertisements for male-dominated areas employed greater masculine wording (i.e., words associated with male stereotypes, such as leader, competitive, dominant) than advertisements within female-dominated areas. No difference in the presence of feminine wording (i.e., words associated with female stereotypes, such as support, understand, interpersonal) emerged across male- and female-dominated areas. Next, the consequences of highly masculine wording were tested across 3 experimental studies. When job advertisements were constructed to include more masculine than feminine wording, participants perceived more men within these occupations (Study 3), and importantly, women found these jobs less appealing (Studies 4 and 5). Results confirmed that perceptions of belongingness (but not perceived skills) mediated the effect of gendered wording on job appeal (Study 5). The function of gendered wording in maintaining traditional gender divisions, implications for gender parity, and theoretical models of inequality are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. dgaucher@princeton.edu
authors.forename: Danielle
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Gaucher
authors.forename: Justin
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Friesen
authors.forename: Aaron C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Kay
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000329:Advertising; D002170:Canada; D002321:Career Choice; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D007587:Job Description; D008297:Male; D009524:Newspapers as Topic; D010560:Personnel Selection; D011287:Prejudice; D012660:Semantics; D012930:Social Dominance; D012933:Social Identification; D013240:Stereotyping; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D055815:Young Adult