title: A dialectical perspective on informed consent to treatment: an examination of radiologists' dilemmas and negotiations.
abstract: Informed consent to treatment (ICT), designed to honor patient autonomy, has been an important subject of inquiry in many disciplines. To foreground the dynamic and dilemmatic tendencies of ICT practice implied by previous inquiries, I advanced relational dialectics theory into the realm of physicians' experiences with ICT. On performing a dialectical analysis of transcripts from focus group discussions with radiologists, I found them experiencing four primary tensions: (a) between simple and complex ICT; (b) between radiologist and patient control; (c) between standardized and idiosyncratic practice (involving struggles between documentation and conversational process, and between vague and detailed language use); and (d) between withholding and disclosing alternatives. Moreover, I drew on concepts from relational dialectics theory to capture the various ways radiologists negotiate these dialectics. I conclude with practical applications for physician and patient training and interprofessional coordination.
authors.affiliation: Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA. olufowot@bc.edu
authors.forename: James Olumide
authors.initials: JO
authors.lastname: Olufowote
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008297:Male; D015146:Midwestern United States; D017008:Negotiating; D005791:Patient Care; D010358:Patient Participation; D011872:Radiology Department, Hospital