title: Recent advances in the management of bovine tuberculosis in free-ranging wildlife.
abstract: Established foci of Mycobacterium bovis (the causative agent of bovine tuberculosis [bTB]) in free-ranging wildlife are currently under various stages of management on three continents (Africa, Europe and North America) and in New Zealand. Other, as yet undiagnosed, foci seem likely to exist elsewhere. The complex roles that these wildlife foci play in the ecology of bTB remain among the greatest challenges facing bTB control globally. Conceptually, management of bTB in free-ranging wildlife can be thought of as progressing from the discovery of an outbreak through frequently overlapping stages of epidemiological characterization, initial control, simulation and forecasting, focused control, and verification of eradication. Surveillance in its various forms remains a critical component of assessment throughout. Since the Fourth International M. bovis Conference in 2005, research on management of bTB in free-ranging wildlife has encompassed such areas as the human dimensions of wildlife management, mitigation of bTB risks from wildlife on cattle farms, vaccine biology, and epidemiology, with a major contribution from simulation modeling. In order to advance the actual field management of bTB, however, research must be sufficiently grounded to aid development of practical, affordable and politically defensible management interventions which stand a reasonable chance of being implemented. The current management of two wildlife reservoirs of bTB, brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) in New Zealand, and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Michigan, USA, serve as contrasting examples of different wildlife management strategies aimed at achieving a common goal. In New Zealand, the importance of agricultural export markets and the status of the possum as a non-native pest have facilitated direct, aggressive management of the disease reservoir, resulting in considerable progress towards bTB freedom since 1994. In Michigan, the relative importance of the hunting economy and of whitetails as a game animal have made such aggressive culling politically untenable. This has forced reliance upon publicly supported, and implemented, management tools, and so provided impetus to better understand social support for wildlife management policy, its limitations, and ways to employ it in disease control policy development.
authors.affiliation: Wildlife Disease Laboratory, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 4125 Beaumont Road, Room 250, Lansing, MI 48910-8106, USA. obriend@michigan.gov
authors.forename: Daniel J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: O'Brien
authors.forename: Stephen M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Schmitt
authors.forename: Brent A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Rudolph
authors.forename: Graham
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Nugent
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000835:Animals, Wild / Q000382:microbiology*; D002170:Canada; D002417:Cattle; D003670:Deer / Q000382:microbiology; D004196:Disease Outbreaks / Q000517:prevention & control; D004197:Disease Reservoirs / Q000382:microbiology / Q000662:veterinary*; D008824:Michigan; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009163:Mycobacterium bovis / Q000276:immunology; D009520:New Zealand; D057766:Policy; D048330:Trichosurus / Q000382:microbiology; D014380:Tuberculosis, Bovine / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006113:United Kingdom