title: Clinical assessment of low-back-pain treatment outcomes in athletes.
abstract: PATIENT SCENARIO: A 21-year-old male rodeo athlete complains of acute low back pain (LBP) after a bareback event. The athlete wishes to compete in a rodeo event in 4 d. CLINICAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT: Given the questionable validity and reliability of traditional clinical examination techniques for LBP, a treatment subgroup classification system combined with clinical outcomes assessment provides greater insight into suitable clinical interventions and patient response to treatment. Four LBP treatment subgroups based on the patient's clinical presentation and symptoms have been established: manipulation, stabilization, specific exercise, and traction. Manipulation subgroup research has produced a valid clinical prediction rule (CPR). The Visual Analog Scale, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Short Form 36 (SF-36), and Global Rating of Change Scale are valid, reliable, and responsive outcomes instruments with established values for minimum clinically important difference (MCID). These instruments document important changes in disablement and health-related quality of life in patients with low back injury, as well as demonstrate treatment outcomes. CLINICAL DECISION MAKING: On examination the athlete presents with moderate pain and disability as measured by the NRS, ODI, and SF-36 and meets all 5 criteria for the manipulation subgroup, indicating a high likelihood of success with manipulative therapy when following the guidelines presented in the CPR. Expected outcomes values, based on MCID values, were met after 1 treatment. Preferred outcomes, based on physical activity requirements for sport, were met on day 4.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  LBP generators are difficult to establish using traditional clinical examination techniques. The combined use of clinical criteria, using an LBP subgroup system, and baseline outcomes measures should guide treatment. Benchmarks should be guided by established MCID values for each instrument.
authors.affiliation: Dept of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
authors.forename: Luzita I
authors.initials: LI
authors.lastname: Vela
authors.forename: Douglas E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Haladay
authors.forename: Craig
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Denegar
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001265:Athletic Injuries / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D003657:Decision Making; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D008297:Male; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods; D011788:Quality of Life; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult