title: Comparing costs associated with risk stratification rules for t-year survival.
abstract: Accurate risk prediction is an important step in developing optimal strategies for disease prevention and treatment. Based on the predicted risks, patients can be stratified to different risk categories where each category corresponds to a particular clinical intervention. Incorrect or suboptimal interventions are likely to result in unnecessary financial and medical consequences. It is thus essential to account for the costs associated with the clinical interventions when developing and evaluating risk stratification (RS) rules for clinical use. In this article, we propose to quantify the value of an RS rule based on the total expected cost attributed to incorrect assignment of risk groups due to the rule. We have established the relationship between cost parameters and optimal threshold values used in the stratification rule that minimizes the total expected cost over the entire population of interest. Statistical inference procedures are developed for evaluating and comparing given RS rules and examined through simulation studies. The proposed procedures are illustrated with an example from the Cardiovascular Health Study.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. tcai@hsph.harvard.edu
authors.forename: Tianxi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Cai
authors.forename: Lu
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Tian
authors.forename: Donald M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Lloyd-Jones
mesh_terms: D056808:Biostatistics; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000401:mortality / Q000517:prevention & control; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012307:Risk Factors; D013997:Time Factors