title: Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
abstract: There is no consensus in literature regarding the best plan for prosthetic rehabilitation with partial multiple adjacent implants to minimize stress generated in the bone-implant interface. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of cemented fixed partial dentures, splinted and nonsplinted, on Morse taper implants and with different types of coating material (ceramic and resin), using photoelastic stress analysis. A photoelastic model of an interposed edentulous space, missing a second premolar and a first molar, and rehabilitated with 4 different types of cemented crowns and supported by 2 adjacent implants was used. Groups were as follows: UC, splinted ceramic crowns; IC, nonsplinted ceramic crowns; UR, splinted resin crowns; and IR, nonsplinted resin crowns. Different vertical static loading conditions were performed: balanced occlusal load, 10 kgf; simultaneous punctiform load on the implanted premolar and molar, 10 kgf; and alternate punctiform load on the implanted premolar and molar, 5 kgf. Changes in stress distribution were analyzed in a polariscope, and digital photographs were taken of each condition to allow comparison of stress pattern distribution around the implants. Cementation of the fixed partial dentures generated stresses between implants. Splinted restorations distributed the stresses more evenly between the implants than nonsplinted when force was applied. Ceramic restorations presented better distribution of stresses than resin restorations. Based on the results obtained, it was concluded that splinted ceramic restorations promote better stress distribution around osseointegrated implants when compared with nonsplinted crowns; metal-ceramic restorations present less stress concentration and magnitude than metal-plastic restorations.
authors.affiliation: Ribeirao Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
authors.forename: Luiz Ricardo
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Menani
authors.forename: Rodrigo
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Tiossi
authors.forename: Érica Miranda
authors.initials: ÉM
authors.lastname: de Torres
authors.forename: Ricardo Faria
authors.initials: RF
authors.lastname: Ribeiro
authors.forename: Rossana Pereira
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: de Almeida
mesh_terms: D000180:Acrylic Resins; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001732:Bite Force; D002516:Ceramics; D003442:Crowns; D015921:Dental Implants; D019094:Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D003779:Denture Design; D003830:Denture, Partial, Fixed; D006801:Humans; D007576:Jaw, Edentulous, Partially / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D003765:Models, Dental; D010781:Photography
chemical_list: D000180:Acrylic Resins; D015921:Dental Implants