title: A randomized trial of the effect of patient race on physicians' intensive care unit and life-sustaining treatment decisions for an acutely unstable elder with end-stage cancer.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To test whether hospital-based physicians made different intensive care unit and life-sustaining treatment decisions for otherwise identical black and white patients with end-stage cancer and life-threatening hypoxia.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a randomized trial of the relationship between patient race and physician treatment decisions using high-fidelity simulation. We counterbalanced the effects of race and case by randomly alternating their order using a table of random permutations. Physicians completed two simulation encounters with black and white patient simulator patients with prognostically identical end-stage gastric or pancreatic cancer and life-threatening hypoxia and hypotension, followed by a self-administered survey of beliefs regarding treatment preferences by race. We conducted within-subjects analysis of each physician's matched-pair simulation encounters, adjusting for order and case effects, and between-subjects analysis of physicians' first encounter, adjusting for case.
  
  
  METHODS
  Peter M. Winter Institute for Simulation Education and Research at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty-three hospital-based attending physicians, including 12 emergency physicians, eight hospitalists, and 13 intensivists from Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
  
  
  METHODS
  Race of patient simulator.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Measurements included physician treatment decisions recorded during the simulation and documented in the chart and beliefs about treatment preference by race. When faced with a black vs. a white patient, physicians did not differ in their elicitation of intubation preferences (within-subject comparison, 28/32 [88%] vs. 28/32 [88%]; p = .589; between-subject comparison, 13/17 [87%] vs. 13/17 [76%]; p = .460), intensive care unit admission (within-subject comparison, 14/32 [44%] vs. 12/32 [38%]; p = .481; between-subject comparison, 8/15 (53%) vs. 7/17 (41%); p = .456), intubation (within-subject comparison, 5/32 [16%] vs. 4/32 [13%]; p = .567; between-subject comparison: 1/15 [7%] vs. 4/17 [24%]; p = .215), or initiation of comfort measures only (within-subject comparison: 16/32 [50%] vs. 19/32 [59%]; p = .681; between-subject comparison: 6/15 [40%] vs. 8/17 [47%]; p = .679). Physicians believed that a black patient with end-stage cancer was more likely than a similar white patient to prefer potentially life-prolonging chemotherapy over treatment focused on palliation (67% vs. 64%; z = -1.79; p = .07) and to want mechanical ventilation for 1 wk of life extension (43% vs. 34%; z = -2.93; p = .003), and less likely to want a do-not-resuscitate order if hospitalized (51% vs. 60%; z = 3.03; p = .003).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this exploratory study, hospital-based physicians did not make different treatment decisions for otherwise identical terminally ill black and white elders despite believing that black patients are more likely to prefer intensive life-sustaining treatment, and they grossly overestimated the preference for intensive treatment for both races.
authors: Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. aeb2@pitt.edu
authors: Amber E
authors: AE
authors: Barnato
authors: Deepika
authors: D
authors: Mohan
authors: Julie
authors: J
authors: Downs
authors: Cindy L
authors: CL
authors: Bryce
authors: Derek C
authors: DC
authors: Angus
authors: Robert M
authors: RM
authors: Arnold
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel / Q000208:ethnology*; D044383:Black People; D003422:Critical Care; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008020:Life Support Care; D008297:Male; D016555:Matched-Pair Analysis; D008875:Middle Aged; D057240:Patient Preference; D016544:Patient Simulation; D010820:Physicians; D011287:Prejudice; D019452:Terminally Ill; D044465:White People