title: Mandibular bone harvesting for alveolar reconstruction and implant placement: subjective and objective cross-sectional evaluation of donor and recipient site up to 4 years.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the long-term morbidity of intraoral bone harvesting from two different donor sites (mandibular symphysis or ramus) for bone augmentation procedures before or at the time of implant placement and to evaluate the success and the survival rates of implants placed in sites augmented with mandibular bone.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventy-eight patients who received mandibular bone grafts were recalled after 18-42 months follow-up (mean 29 months). The group consisted of 36 men and 42 women aged between 18 and 68 years old at the moment of augmentation surgery. Vitality of teeth adjacent to the harvesting sites was investigated. Soft tissue superficial sensory function was assessed by the Pointed-Blunt Test and the Two-Point-Discrimination Test. Implant health status was assessed measuring peri-implant probing depth and bleeding on probing. Implant survival and success rates were also calculated. In order to evaluate patients' perception of the morbidity of the procedures, the patients were asked to answer several questions by means of visual analogue scales (VAS).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Only two teeth (out of 282) in the chin harvesting group needed root canal treatment after surgery. A higher frequency of minor temporary and permanent sensorial disturbances was found in the group of patients who received chin harvesting procedures (2.3% vs. 13%P=0.03), while pain during chewing and bleeding were more frequently recorded after ramus harvesting (9.8% vs. 0%P=0.03). No permanent anesthesia of any region of the skin was reported. Implants' survival and success rate were comparable to implants placed in bone reconstructed with other techniques and were not influenced by the choice of the donor site. Patient's perception regarding the morbidity of the procedures was very low and did not differ between ramus and chin harvesting groups (mean VAS scores <4).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The present cross-sectional retrospective study demonstrated the safety of mandibular grafts that reported excellent results in terms of implant success and survival rates with minor complications regarding the donor site area. When the chin was chosen as donor site, minor sensorial disturbances of mucosa and teeth were recorded. The majority of these disturbances were temporary; only few of them were permanent but still had no impact on patient's life.
authors: Department of Periodontics and Prosthodontics, Eastman Dental Hospital, Roma, Italy. lucacordaro@usa.net
authors: Luca
authors: L
authors: Cordaro
authors: Ferruccio
authors: F
authors: Torsello
authors: Maria Tindara
authors: MT
authors: Miuccio
authors: Vincenzo Mirisola
authors: VM
authors: di Torresanto
authors: Dimitris
authors: D
authors: Eliopoulos
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000540:Alveolar Ridge Augmentation / Q000379:methods*; D016025:Bone Transplantation / Q000379:methods*; D002680:Chin / Q000601:surgery; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous / Q000379:methods*; D015921:Dental Implants; D003791:Dental Pulp Test; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005884:Gingival Hemorrhage / Q000145:classification; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010514:Periodontal Pocket / Q000145:classification; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Q000379:methods*; D014110:Touch / Q000502:physiology; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D015921:Dental Implants