title: In defence of inclusive fitness theory.
abstract: Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson 466, 1057-1062 (2010); Nowak et al. reply. Arguably the defining characteristic of the scientific process is its capacity for self-criticism and correction. Nowak et al. challenge proposed connections between relatedness and the evolution of eusociality, suggest instead that defensible nests and "spring-loaded" traits are key, and present alternative modelling approaches. They then dismiss the utility of Hamilton's insight that relatedness has a profound evolutionary effect, formalized in his widely accepted inclusive fitness theory as Hamilton's rule ("Rise and fall of inclusive fitness theory"). However, we believe that Nowak et al. fail to make their case for logical, theoretical and empirical reasons.
authors: Edward Allen
authors: EA
authors: Herre
authors: William T
authors: WT
authors: Wcislo
mesh_terms: D000533:Altruism; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D005260:Female; D005716:Game Theory; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D005828:Genetics, Population; D040941:Heredity; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D008957:Models, Genetic; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D012744:Sex Ratio