title: Incongruency effects in affective processing: automatic motivational counter-regulation or mismatch-induced salience?
abstract: Attention is automatically allocated to stimuli that are opposite in valence to the current motivational focus (Rothermund, 2003; Rothermund, Voss, & Wentura, 2008). We tested whether this incongruency effect is due to affective-motivational counter-regulation or to an increased salience of stimuli that mismatch with cognitively activated information. Affective processing biases were assessed with a search task in which participants had to detect the spatial position at which a positive or negative stimulus was presented. In the motivational condition, positive or negative affective-motivational states were induced by performance feedback after each trial. In the cognitive activation condition, participants memorised the word "good" or "bad" during the search task. The affective incongruency effect was replicated in the motivational condition, whereas an affective congruency effect obtained in the cognitive activation condition. These findings support an explanation of affective incongruency effects in terms of automatic counter-regulation that is motivational in nature.
authors: Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena, Institut für Psychologie, AmSteiger 3, Haus 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany. klaus.rothermund@uni-jena.de
authors: Klaus
authors: K
authors: Rothermund
authors: Anne
authors: A
authors: Gast
authors: Dirk
authors: D
authors: Wentura
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000339:Affect; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D009042:Motivation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D012927:Social Control, Informal