title: The economic analysis of prevention in mental health programs.
abstract: This article introduces the role economics can play in deciding whether programs designed to prevent mental disorders, which carry large disease and economic burdens, are a worthwhile use of limited healthcare resources. Fortunately, preventive interventions for mental disorders exist; however, which interventions should be financed is a common issue facing decision makers, and economic evaluation can provide answers. Unfortunately, existing economic evaluations of preventive interventions have limited applicability to local healthcare contexts. An approach to priority setting largely based on economic techniques-Assessing Cost-Effectiveness (ACE)-has been developed and used in Australia to answer questions regarding the economic credentials of competing interventions. Eleven preventive interventions for mental disorders and suicide, mostly psychological in nature, have been evaluated using this approach, with many meeting the criteria of good value for money. Interventions targeting the prevention of suicide, adult and childhood depression, childhood anxiety, and early psychosis have particular merit.
authors: Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Burwood, 3125, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. cathy.mihalopoulos@deakin.edu.au
authors: Cathrine
authors: C
authors: Mihalopoulos
authors: Theo
authors: T
authors: Vos
authors: Jane
authors: J
authors: Pirkis
authors: Rob
authors: R
authors: Carter
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001315:Australia; D002648:Child; D017281:Cost of Illness; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000191:economics / Q000517:prevention & control; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000191:economics / Q000517:prevention & control*; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000191:economics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D013405:Suicide / Q000191:economics; D000092864:Suicide Prevention