title: Clustering more than two million biomedical publications: comparing the accuracies of nine text-based similarity approaches.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  We investigate the accuracy of different similarity approaches for clustering over two million biomedical documents. Clustering large sets of text documents is important for a variety of information needs and applications such as collection management and navigation, summary and analysis. The few comparisons of clustering results from different similarity approaches have focused on small literature sets and have given conflicting results. Our study was designed to seek a robust answer to the question of which similarity approach would generate the most coherent clusters of a biomedical literature set of over two million documents.
  
  
  METHODS
  We used a corpus of 2.15 million recent (2004-2008) records from MEDLINE, and generated nine different document-document similarity matrices from information extracted from their bibliographic records, including titles, abstracts and subject headings. The nine approaches were comprised of five different analytical techniques with two data sources. The five analytical techniques are cosine similarity using term frequency-inverse document frequency vectors (tf-idf cosine), latent semantic analysis (LSA), topic modeling, and two Poisson-based language models--BM25 and PMRA (PubMed Related Articles). The two data sources were a) MeSH subject headings, and b) words from titles and abstracts. Each similarity matrix was filtered to keep the top-n highest similarities per document and then clustered using a combination of graph layout and average-link clustering. Cluster results from the nine similarity approaches were compared using (1) within-cluster textual coherence based on the Jensen-Shannon divergence, and (2) two concentration measures based on grant-to-article linkages indexed in MEDLINE.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  PubMed's own related article approach (PMRA) generated the most coherent and most concentrated cluster solution of the nine text-based similarity approaches tested, followed closely by the BM25 approach using titles and abstracts. Approaches using only MeSH subject headings were not competitive with those based on titles and abstracts.
authors: SciTech Strategies, Inc., Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America. kboyack@mapofscience.com
authors: Kevin W
authors: KW
authors: Boyack
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Newman
authors: Russell J
authors: RJ
authors: Duhon
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Klavans
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Patek
authors: Joseph R
authors: JR
authors: Biberstine
authors: Bob
authors: B
authors: Schijvenaars
authors: André
authors: A
authors: Skupin
authors: Nianli
authors: N
authors: Ma
authors: Katy
authors: K
authors: Börner
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D004282:Documentation; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval / Q000379:methods*; D010506:Periodicals as Topic