title: Surgical technique: the anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The anterosuperior approach used for reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an intermediate between the transacromial approach originally proposed by Paul Grammont and the anterosuperior approach described by D. B. Mackenzie for shoulder arthroplasty. As an alternative to the deltopectoral approach, the anterosuperior approach has the advantages of simplicity and postoperative stability.
  
  
  METHODS
  The anterior deltoid is divided from the anterior edge of the acromioclavicular arch, allowing exposure to the glenoid for glenosphere implantation.
  
  
  METHODS
  We used the findings of published studies to assess instability, function and pain scores, scapular notching, and complications after this approach.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In a comparison of the deltopectoral and anterosuperior approaches in 527 reverse arthroplasties with a minimum 2-year followup, postoperative instability rate was greater with the deltopectoral (5.1%) than with the anterosuperior (0.8%) approach. Other published studies confirm this finding. No differences in Constant-Murley score or active mobility were found. Scapular notching occurred at similar rates after the anterosuperior (74%) and deltopectoral (63%) approaches. Humeral diaphyseal fracture rates were similar, whereas the acromial fracture rate was higher using the deltopectoral approach. Loosening tended to occur more often with the anterosuperior approach.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The anterosuperior approach can be used in primary and revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty, as well as in acute humeral head fracture. Its main apparent advantages are simplicity, ease of axial humerus preparation, quality of frontal exposure of the glenoid, and due to subscapularis tendon preservation, a low risk of postoperative instability. Its drawbacks are risk of inaccurate glenoid positioning, axillary nerve palsy, and deltoid weakening.
authors: Clinique de Traumatologie et d'Orthopédie, 49 rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France. d.mole@wanadoo.fr
authors: Daniel
authors: D
authors: Molé
authors: Frank
authors: F
authors: Wein
authors: Charles
authors: C
authors: Dézaly
authors: Philippe
authors: P
authors: Valenti
authors: François
authors: F
authors: Sirveaux
mesh_terms: D019643:Arthroplasty, Replacement / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D007595:Joint Prosthesis; D010147:Pain Measurement; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D010243:Paralysis / Q000209:etiology; D056888:Patient Positioning; D017933:Peripheral Nervous System / Q000293:injuries; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012086:Reoperation; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D012785:Shoulder Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D020069:Shoulder Pain / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome