title: Charter rights & health care funding: a typology of Canadian health rights litigation.
abstract: Canadian health consumers have increasingly relied on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to demand certain therapies and reasonably timely access to care. Organizing these cases into a 5-part typology, we examine how a rights-based discourse affects allocation of health care resources. First, successful Charter challenges can, in theory, lead to courts granting and enforcing positive rights to therapies or to timely care. Second, courts may grant a right to certain health services; however, subsequently government fails to deliver on this right. Third, successful litigation may create negative rights, i.e. rights to access care or private health insurance without government interference. Fourth, consumers can fail in their legal pursuit of a right but galvanize public support in the process, ultimately effecting the desired policy changes. Lastly, a failed lawsuit can stifle an entire advocacy campaign for the sought-after therapies. The typology illustrates the need to examine both legal and policy outcomes of health right litigation. This broader analysis reveals that the pursuit of health rights seems to have caused largely a regressive rather than progressive impact on Canadian Medicare.
authors: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Health Services and Policy Research.
authors: Colleen M
authors: CM
authors: Flood
authors: Y Y Brandon
authors: YY
authors: Chen
mesh_terms: D002170:Canada; D005380:Financing, Government; D006806:Human Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics*