title: Accessing genitourinary medicine clinics: does it matter where you live?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in England are located conveniently for potential users and to assess whether there are any regional variations in accessibility.
  
  
  METHODS
  A surface model was created in ArcGIS to estimate driving times to the nearest GUM clinic and to identify the proportion of the population living more than 30 minutes drive from their nearest clinic.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, 3.0% of the population live further than 30 minutes from their nearest clinic. However, this average figure disguises considerable regional variation. While access in London and the South East was excellent, with less than 1% of the population living more than 30 minutes from the nearest clinic, in the South West and the East of England, these percentages rose to 7.7% and 9.2%, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In some regions of England it is important to consider the physical barriers to clinic access, as inability or unwillingness to undertake a long journey to a GUM clinic may increase the workload in other clinical settings.
authors.affiliation: School of Social Sciences and Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. bls1@soton.ac.uk
authors.forename: Beth
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Stuart
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hinde
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003153:Community Health Services; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D052776:Female Urogenital Diseases / Q000628:therapy*; D040362:Geographic Information Systems; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D052801:Male Urogenital Diseases / Q000628:therapy*; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D019035:Rural Health Services