title: Efficacy of UV light treatment for the microbiological decontamination of chicken, associated packaging, and contact surfaces.
abstract: UV light was investigated for the decontamination of raw chicken, associated packaging, and contact surfaces. The UV susceptibilities of a number of Campylobacter isolates (seven Campylobacter jejuni isolates and three Campylobacter coli isolates), Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis ATCC 10376 in liquid media were also investigated. From an initial level of 7 log CFU/ml, no viable Campylobacter cells were detected following exposure to the most intense UV dose (0.192 J/cm(2)) in liquid media (skim milk subjected to ultrahigh-temperature treatment and diluted 1:4 with maximum recovery diluent). Maximum reductions of 4.8 and 6.2 log CFU/ml were achieved for E. coli and serovar Enteritidis, respectively, in liquid media. Considerable differences in susceptibilities were found between the Campylobacter isolates examined, with variations of up to 4 log CFU/ml being observed. UV treatment of raw chicken fillet (0.192 J/cm(2)) reduced C. jejuni, E. coli, serovar Enteritidis, total viable counts, and Enterobacteriaceae by 0.76, 0.98, 1.34, 1.76, and 1.29 log CFU/g, respectively. Following UV treatment of packaging and surface materials, reductions of up to 3.97, 4.50, and 4.20 log CFU/cm(2) were obtained for C. jejuni, E. coli, and serovar Enteritidis, respectively (P < 0.05). Overall, the color of UV-treated chicken was not significantly affected (P ≥ 0.05). The findings of this study indicate that Campylobacter is susceptible to UV technology and that differences in sensitivities exist between investigated isolates. Overall, UV could be used for improving the microbiological quality of raw chicken and for decontaminating associated packaging and surface materials.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Food & Health, School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
authors.forename: P N
authors.initials: PN
authors.lastname: Haughton
authors.forename: J G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Lyng
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Cronin
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Morgan
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Fanning
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Whyte
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017000:Campylobacter coli / Q000254:growth & development / Q000528:radiation effects; D016123:Campylobacter jejuni / Q000254:growth & development / Q000528:radiation effects; D002645:Chickens / Q000382:microbiology*; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D003257:Consumer Product Safety; D003666:Decontamination / Q000379:methods*; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D004777:Environment; D004866:Equipment Contamination / Q000517:prevention & control; D005506:Food Contamination / Q000032:analysis / Q000517:prevention & control*; D005514:Food Irradiation; D005516:Food Microbiology; D018857:Food Packaging / Q000379:methods*; D005519:Food Preservation / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D050296:Microbial Viability / Q000528:radiation effects*; D012477:Salmonella enteritidis / Q000254:growth & development / Q000528:radiation effects; D014466:Ultraviolet Rays