title: Evolution of quality and surgical risk assessment in the USA.
abstract: As health-care reforms progress, quality and risk assessment in the health-care system of the USA surface as critical issues. This review considers past, present and possible future changes in quality assessment along with formal programs of complication reduction and pay for performance (PFP) as related to surgery and vascular interventions. Strategies for quality improvement include aggregate and risk-adjusted outcome measurement, process compliance with the Surgical Complication Improvement Program, oversight and PFP, now policies of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Advantages, disadvantages and unintended consequences of these policies are discussed. While ongoing system changes will influence vascular surgical practice, unique opportunities and obligations exist for vascular surgeons to contribute to quality assessment of their interventions, to evaluate long-term outcomes and to devise strategies for comprehensive cost-effective care for the conditions affecting patients with vascular disease.
authors.affiliation: Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA. ralph.depalma@va.gov
authors.forename: Ralph G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Depalma
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive; D018570:Risk Assessment; D014481:United States; D014656:Vascular Surgical Procedures / Q000592:standards*