title: Inference is bliss: using evolutionary relationship to guide categorical inferences.
abstract: Three experiments, adopting an evolutionary biology perspective, investigated subjects' inferences about living things. Subjects were told that different enzymes help regulate cell function in two taxa and asked which enzyme a third taxon most likely uses. Experiment 1 and its follow-up, with college students, used triads involving amphibians, reptiles, and mammals (reptiles and mammals are most closely related evolutionarily) and plants, fungi, and animals (fungi are more closely related to animals than to plants). Experiment 2, with 10th graders, also included triads involving mammals, birds, and snakes/crocodilians (birds and snakes/crocodilians are most closely related). Some subjects received cladograms (hierarchical diagrams) depicting the evolutionary relationships among the taxa. The effect of providing cladograms depended on students' background in biology. The results illuminate students' misconceptions concerning common taxa and constraints on their willingness to override faulty knowledge when given appropriate evolutionary evidence. Implications for introducing tree thinking into biology curricula are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203-5721, USA. laura.novick@vanderbilt.edu
authors.forename: Laura R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Novick
authors.forename: Kefyn M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Catley
authors.forename: Daniel J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Funk
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning; D005075:Biological Evolution; D002965:Classification / Q000379:methods*; D003210:Concept Formation; D005260:Female; D005793:Generalization, Psychological; D049810:Genetic Speciation; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010802:Phylogeny; D011340:Problem Solving; D012660:Semantics