title: Sex differences in coincidence-anticipation timing (CAT): a review.
abstract: Coincidence-anticipation timing (CAT) is the ability to judge when a moving stimulus will arrive at a target. 43 articles were reviewed which investigated sex differences in this skill. Performance was typically recorded as one or more of three error measures, absolute error (AE), constant error (CE), and variable error (VE). Despite many null findings, it is argued that the evidence for a male advantage is strong, particularly for AE and VE. 10 parameters typically associated with CAT studies were analyzed (e.g., knowledge of results, number of trials, stimulus duration, and stimulus speed), but none differentiated clearly between the presence and absence of the sex difference. However, when the mean AE score was used as a measure of task difficulty, a male advantage was reliably associated with lower values of AE (easier tasks) and null findings with higher values (more difficult tasks). An attempt to compare sex difference findings from Bassin timer and real-world tasks was thwarted by the lack of studies using real-world tasks. Given little evidence for the influence of socialization on sex differences in CAT, it is suggested that the difference may have originated from the evolutionary selection of women for gathering and men for hunting.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, London Metropolitan University, London E1 7NT, United Kingdom. g.sanders@londonmet.ac.uk
authors.forename: Geoff
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Sanders
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D012737:Sex Factors