title: Studying populations without molecular biology: Aster Models and a new argument against reductionism.
abstract: During the past few decades, philosophers of biology have debated the issue of reductionism versus anti-reductionism, with both sides often claiming a 'pluralist' position. However, both sides also tend to focus on a single research paradigm, which analyzes living things in terms of certain macromolecular components. I offer a case study where biologists pursue other analytic pathways, in a tradition of quantitative genetics that originates with the initially purely mathematical theories of R. A. Fisher, J. B. S. Haldane, and Sewall Wright in the 1930s. Aster Models (developed by Ruth Shaw and Charles Geyer) offers a class of statistical models designed for studying the fitness of plant and animal populations, by integrating the measurements of separate, sequential, non-normally distributed fitness components in novel ways. Their work generates important theoretical and practical results that do not require elaboration by molecular biology, and thus serves as a counterexample to the claims of philosophers whose 'pluralism' still harbors reductionist assumptions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, 240 Sparks Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. erg2@psu.edu
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Grosholz
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D005828:Genetics, Population / Q000266:history* / Q000379:methods; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D008954:Models, Biological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D008967:Molecular Biology / Q000266:history*; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history; D010944:Plants / Q000235:genetics; D012107:Research Design