title: Is circumferential injection advantageous for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block?: A proof-of-concept study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Ultrasound (US) guidance, in some instances, can increase the success rate and reduce the onset and procedure times for peripheral nerve blockade compared with traditional nerve localization techniques. The presumptive mechanism for these benefits is the ability to accurately inject local anesthetic circumferentially around the target nerve. We aimed to determine whether ensuring circumferential spread of local anesthetic is advantageous for US-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sixty-four adult patients undergoing US-guided popliteal sciatic block for elective foot and ankle surgery were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups, circumferential or single-location injection. Using a short-axis nerve view and out-of-plane needle approach, the needle tip was advanced to the posterior external surface of the sciatic nerve. A 30-mL local anesthetic admixture (1:1 lidocaine 2%/bupivacaine 0.5% with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected either entirely at this location (single location) or incrementally at multiple locations to ensure circumferential spread around the sciatic nerve (circumferential). Sensory and motor functions were assessed by a blinded observer at predetermined intervals. The primary outcome was sensory block defined as loss of sensation to pinprick in the distribution of both tibial and common peroneal nerves at 30 mins after injection.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sensory block was achieved in 94% of patients in the circumferential injection group compared with 69% in the single-location injection group (P = 0.010). There were no differences detected in block performance time, pain during block performance, or block-related complications between groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Ultrasound-guided circumferential injection of local anesthetic around the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa can improve the rate of sensory block without an increase in block procedure time or block-related complications compared with a single-location injection technique.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. richard.brull@uhn.on.ca
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Brull
authors.forename: Alan J R
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Macfarlane
authors.forename: Simon J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Parrington
authors.forename: Arkadiy
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Koshkin
authors.forename: Vincent W S
authors.initials: VW
authors.lastname: Chan
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001340:Autonomic Nerve Block / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D017558:Elective Surgical Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010543:Peroneal Nerve / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D012584:Sciatic Nerve / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D018084:Ultrasonography, Interventional / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*