title: The effect of femoral component rotation on the kinematics of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints after total knee arthroplasty.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often involve the patellofemoral joint, and problems with patellar maltracking or lateral instability have sometimes been addressed by external rotation of the femoral component. This work sought to measure the changes of knee kinematics caused by TKA and then to optimise the restoration of both the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint kinematics, by variation of femoral component internal-external rotation.
  
  
  METHODS
  The kinematics of the patella and tibia were measured in eight cadaveric knees during active extension motion. This was repeated with the knee intact, with a Genesis II TKA in the standard position (3° of external rotation) and with the femoral component at ±5° rotation from there.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both patellar and tibial motions were significantly different from normal with the standard TKA rotation, with 3° tibial abduction at 90° flexion and reversal of the screw-home from 5° external rotation to 6° internal rotation. The patella was shifted medially 6 mm in flexion and tilted 7° more laterally near extension. Femoral rotation to address one abnormality caused increased abnormality in other degrees of freedom. Internal and then external rotation of 5° caused tibial abduction and then adduction of 5° at 90° flexion. These femoral rotations also caused increased patellar lateral tilt of 4° with femoral external rotation and decreased tilt by 4° with internal rotation. Thus, correction of tibial abduction in flexion, by external rotation of the femoral component, worsened the patellar lateral tilt near extension.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  It was concluded that femoral rotation alone could not restore all aspects of both patellar and tibial kinematics to normal with this specific implant. The clinical relevance of this is that it appears to be inadvisable to reposition the femoral component, in an attempt to improve patellar tracking, if that repositioning may then cause abnormal tibiofemoral kinematics. Further, the pattern of patellar tracking, with the type of TKA used in this study, could not be adjusted to normal by femoral component rotation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Merican
authors.forename: K M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Ghosh
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Iranpour
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Deehan
authors.forename: Andrew A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Amis
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002102:Cadaver; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D057071:Patellofemoral Joint / Q000503:physiopathology*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology*; D012016:Reference Values; D012399:Rotation; D013977:Tibia / Q000503:physiopathology