title: Response to open peer commentaries on "assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials".
authors.affiliation: Centre for Philosophy, Justice and Health, University College London, London W1W7EJ, United Kingdom. sarah.edwards@ucl.ac.uk
authors.forename: Sarah J L
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Edwards
mesh_terms: D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000941:ethics*; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D032982:Contracts / Q000941:ethics*; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics; D010352:Patient Dropouts / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D028701:Patient Rights / Q000941:ethics; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D035842:Research Subjects / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D035844:Researcher-Subject Relations / Q000941:ethics*