title: Thrombus in transit within a patent foramen ovale: an argument for consideration of prophylactic closure?
abstract: Recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE) in prothrombotic patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) is not considered a setting for elective PFO closure. We describe a 35-year-old woman with known PFO, recurrent PE on warfarin, and Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome-a condition with predisposition for thromboembolism-who suffered concurrent saddle PE and devastating stroke with further impending paradoxical embolus across the PFO. Optimal management in patients with biatrial thromboembolus caught in transit across PFO is challenging. Patients with recurrent PE, prothrombotic states, and PFO should be considered for PFO closure. Prompt diagnosis of impending paradoxical embolus with echocardiography and consideration of surgical removal and PFO closure are critical.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Hospital Road, Concord NSW 2139, Australia.
authors.forename: Vincent
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Chow
authors.forename: William
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wilson
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Yiannikas
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003328:Coronary Thrombosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000209:etiology*; D017548:Echocardiography, Transesophageal; D005260:Female; D054092:Foramen Ovale, Patent / Q000150:complications* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D007715:Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome / Q000150:complications* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011655:Pulmonary Embolism / Q000517:prevention & control; D017131:Thrombectomy