title: Does IMRT increase the peripheral radiation dose? A comparison of treatment plans 2000 and 2010.
abstract: It has been reported in several papers and textbooks that IMRT treatments increase the peripheral dose in comparison with non-IMRT fields. But in clinical practice not only open fields have been used in the pre-IMRT era, but also fields with physical wedges or composed fields. The aim of this work is to test the hypothesis of increased peripheral dose when IMRT is used compared to standard conformal radiotherapy. Furthermore, the importance of the measured dose differences in clinical practice is discussed and compared with other new technologies for the cases where an increase of the peripheral dose was observed. For cancers of the head and neck, the cervix, the rectum and for the brain irradiation due to acute leukaemia, one to four plans have been calculated with IMRT or conformal standard technique (non-IMRT). In an anthropomorphic phantom the dose at a distance of 30cm in cranio-caudal direction from the target edge was measured with TLDs using a linear accelerator Oncor (®) (Siemens) for both techniques. IMRT was performed using step-and-shoot technique (7 to 11 beams), non-IMRT plans with different techniques. The results depended on the site of irradiation. For head and neck cancers IMRT resulted in an increase of 0.05 - 0.09% of the prescribed total dose (Dptv) or 40 - 70 mGy (Dptv=65Gy), compared to non-IMRT technique without wedges or a decrease of 0.16% (approx. 100 mGy) of the prescribed total dose compared to non-IMRT techniques with wedges. For the cervical cancer IMRT resulted in an increased dose in the periphery (+ 0.07% - 0.15% of Dptv or 30 - 70 mGy at Dptv=45Gy), for the rectal cancer in a dose reduction (0.21 - 0.26% of Dptv or 100 - 130 mGy at Dptv=50Gy) and for the brain irradiation in an increase dose (+ 0.05% of Dptv=18Gy or 9 mSv). In summary IMRT does not uniformly cause increased radiation dose in the periphery in the model used. It can be stated that these dose values are smaller than reported in earlier papers. Slightly increased additional radiation dose in the periphery is likely to be counterbalanced by the much higher conformity and the often better homogeneity.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Jena. henning.salz@med.uni-jena.de
authors.forename: Henning
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Salz
authors.forename: Regina
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Eichner
authors.forename: Tilo
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Wiezorek
mesh_terms: D001932:Brain Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy; D002675:Child, Preschool; D016371:Cranial Irradiation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015470:Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute / Q000532:radiotherapy; D015182:Lymphatic Irradiation; D008297:Male; D010039:Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011835:Radiation Protection; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000639:trends*; D020266:Radiotherapy, Conformal / Q000295:instrumentation; D050397:Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy; D012542:Scattering, Radiation; D012984:Software; D013116:Spinal Cord / Q000528:radiation effects; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy