title: Triatoma dimidiata infestation in Chagas disease endemic regions of Guatemala: comparison of random and targeted cross-sectional surveys.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Guatemala is presently engaged in the Central America Initiative to interrupt Chagas disease transmission by reducing intradomiciliary prevalence of Triatoma dimidiata, using targeted cross-sectional surveys to direct control measures to villages exceeding the 5% control threshold. The use of targeted surveys to guide disease control programs has not been evaluated. Here, we compare the findings from the targeted surveys to concurrent random cross-sectional surveys in two primary foci of Chagas disease transmission in central and southeastern Guatemala.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Survey prevalences of T. dimidiata intradomiciliary infestation by village and region were compared. Univariate logistic regression was used to assess the use of risk factors to target surveys and to evaluate indicators associated with village level intradomiciliary prevalences >5% by survey and region. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to assess the ability of random and targeted surveys to target villages with intradomiciliary prevalence exceeding the control threshold within each region. Regional prevalences did not vary by survey; however, village prevalences were significantly greater in random surveys in central (13.0% versus 8.7%) and southeastern (22.7% versus 6.9%) Guatemala. The number of significant risk factors detected did not vary by survey in central Guatemala but differed considerably in the southeast with a greater number of significant risk factors in the random survey (e.g. land surface temperature, relative humidity, cropland, grassland, tile flooring, and stick and mud and palm and straw walls). Differences in the direction of risk factor associations were observed between regions in both survey types. The overall discriminative capacity was significantly greater in the random surveys in central and southeastern Guatemala, with an area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) of 0.84 in the random surveys and approximately 0.64 in the targeted surveys in both regions. Sensitivity did not differ between surveys, but the positive predictive value was significantly greater in the random surveys.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Surprisingly, targeted surveys were not more effective at determining T. dimidiata prevalence or at directing control to high risk villages in comparison to random surveys. We recommend that random surveys should be selected over targeted surveys whenever possible, particularly when the focus is on directing disease control and elimination and when risk factor association has not been evaluated for all regions under investigation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. raymond.king@lshtm.ac.uk
authors.forename: Raymond J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: King
authors.forename: Celia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cordon-Rosales
authors.forename: Jonathan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Cox
authors.forename: Clive R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Davies
authors.forename: Uriel D
authors.initials: UD
authors.lastname: Kitron
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D014355:Chagas Disease / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D019353:Endemic Diseases; D005191:Family Characteristics; D006166:Guatemala / Q000453:epidemiology; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D007300:Insect Control; D008924:Mite Infestations / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D015995:Prevalence; D014224:Triatoma / Q000254:growth & development*