title: Best clinical trials reported in 2010.
abstract: Each year, a number of clinical trials emerge with data sufficient to change clinical practice. Determining which findings will result in practice change and which will provide only incremental benefit can be a dilemma for clinicians. The authors review selected clinical trials reported in 2010 in journals, at society meetings, and at conferences, focusing on those studies that have the potential to change clinical practice. This review offers 3 separate means of analysis: an abbreviated text summary, organized by subject area; a comprehensive table of relevant clinical trials that provides a schematic review of the hypotheses, interventions, methods, primary end points, results, and implications; and a complete bibliography for further reading as warranted. It is hoped that this compilation of relevant clinical trials and their important findings released in 2010 will be of benefit in the everyday practice of cardiovascular medicine.
authors.affiliation: Baylor University Medical Center/Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart Hospital, Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
authors.forename: John B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Garner
authors.forename: Paul A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Grayburn
authors.forename: Clyde W
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Yancy
mesh_terms: D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012189:Retrospective Studies