title: Selective responses to threat: the roles of race and gender in decisions to shoot.
abstract: Extensive work over the past decade has shown that race can bias perceptions and responses to threat. However, the previous work focused almost exclusively on responses to men and overlooked how gender and the interaction of race and gender influence decisions regarding use of force. In the current article, two studies examine the implications of gender (Study 1) and both race and gender (Study 2) for decisions to shoot criminal suspects on a computerized simulation. In Study 1, participants were biased away from shooting White female suspects compared to White male suspects. In Study 2, White participants showed a pronounced bias toward shooting Black men but a bias away from shooting Black women and White ingroup members, providing evidence of a behavioral threat-related response specific to outgroup men stereotypically associated with aggression. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA. plant@psy.fsu.edu
authors.forename: E Ashby
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Plant
authors.forename: Joanna
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Goplen
authors.forename: Jonathan W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Kunstman
mesh_terms: D000374:Aggression / Q000523:psychology*; D044383:Black People / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D005389:Firearms; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016495:Police; D011287:Prejudice; D044469:Racial Groups / Q000523:psychology*; D012737:Sex Factors; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D013240:Stereotyping; D044465:White People / Q000523:psychology