title: What do primary care physicians and researchers consider the most important patient safety improvement strategies?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although it has been increasingly recognised that patient safety in primary care is important, little is known about the feasibility and effectiveness of different strategies to improve patient safety in primary care. In this study, we aimed to identify the most important strategies by consulting an international panel of primary care physicians and researchers.
  
  
  METHODS
  A web-based survey was undertaken in an international panel of 58 individuals from eight countries with a strong primary care system. The questionnaire consisted of 38 strategies to improve patient safety. We asked the respondents whether these strategies were currently used in their own country, and whether they felt them to be important.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Most of the 38 presented strategies were seen as important by a majority of the participants, but the use of strategies in daily practice varied widely. Strategies that yielded the highest scores (>70%) regarding importance included a good medical record system (82% felt this was very important, while 83% said it was implemented in more than half of the practices), good telephone access (71% importance, 83% implementation), standards for record keeping (75% importance, 62% implementation), learning culture (74% importance, 10% implementation), vocational training on patient safety for GPs (81% importance, 24% implementation) and the presence of a patient safety guideline (81% importance, 15% implementation).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  An international panel of primary care physicians and researchers felt that many different strategies to improve patient safety were important. Highly important strategies with poor implementation included a culture that is positive for patient safety, education on patient safety for physicians, and the presence of a patient safety guideline.
authors.affiliation: Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. s.gaal@iq.umcn.nl
authors.forename: Sander
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gaal
authors.forename: Wim
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Verstappen
authors.forename: Michel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wensing
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002983:Clinical Competence; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D020407:Internet; D008297:Male; D009520:New Zealand; D005791:Patient Care / Q000379:methods*; D058007:Physicians, Primary Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012108:Research Personnel; D012449:Safety; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires