title: Just caring: health care rationing, terminal illness, and the medically least well off.
abstract: What does it mean to be a "just" and "caring" society in meeting the health care needs of the terminally ill when we have only limited resources to meet virtually unlimited health care needs? That question is the focus of this essay. Put another way: relative to all the other health care needs in our society, especially the need for lifesaving or life-prolonging health care, how high a priority ought the health care needs of persons who are terminally ill have? On the one hand, we might see the terminally ill as being among the "medically least well off" and therefore deserving very high priority. On the other hand, we might see them as squandering vast medical resources for marginal medical benefits, thereby denying needed resources to others who would benefit much more. We begin the essay by making a number of morally relevant distinctions with regard to the category of "being terminally ill." We note, given contemporary medicine, that individuals may be terminally ill several times in the course of a life. Not all such circumstances make equal just claims to needed health care. We also note that our conceptions of health care justice are ultimately incapable of making very fine-grained, morally justified rationing judgments in complex medical circumstances. We conclude that we must finally rely upon fair processes of rational democratic deliberation to articulate such judgments for our own future, possibly terminally ill selves, thereby undercutting the rhetoric of "death panels."
authors.affiliation: Philosophy Department, College of Arts and Letters, Michigan State University, MI, USA.
authors.forename: Leonard M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Fleck
mesh_terms: D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000941:ethics; D006801:Humans; D012935:Social Justice; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000941:ethics; D019452:Terminally Ill; D014481:United States; D028761:Withholding Treatment / Q000941:ethics