title: Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: a study protocol.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Decision aids have been developed in a number of health disciplines to support evidence-informed decision making, including patient decision aids and clinical practice guidelines. However, policy contexts differ from clinical contexts in terms of complexity and uncertainty, requiring different approaches for identifying, interpreting, and applying many different types of evidence to support decisions. With few studies in the literature offering decision guidance specifically to health policymakers, the present study aims to facilitate the structured and systematic incorporation of research evidence and, where there is currently very little guidance, values and other non-research-based evidence, into the policy making process. The resulting decision aid is intended to help public sector health policy decision makers who are tasked with making evidence-informed decisions on behalf of populations. The intent is not to develop a decision aid that will yield uniform recommendations across jurisdictions, but rather to facilitate more transparent policy decisions that reflect a balanced consideration of all relevant factors.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study comprises three phases: a modified meta-narrative review, the use of focus groups, and the application of a Delphi method. The modified meta-narrative review will inform the initial development of the decision aid by identifying as many policy decision factors as possible and other features of methodological guidance deemed to be desirable in the literatures of all relevant disciplines. The first of two focus groups will then seek to marry these findings with focus group members' own experience and expertise in public sector population-based health policy making and screening decisions. The second focus group will examine issues surrounding the application of the decision aid and act as a sounding board for initial feedback and refinement of the draft decision aid. Finally, the Delphi method will be used to further inform and refine the decision aid with a larger audience of potential end-users.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The product of this research will be a working version of a decision aid to support policy makers in population-based health policy decisions. The decision aid will address the need for more structured and systematic ways of incorporating various evidentiary sources where applicable.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. peggy.tso@utoronto.ca
authors.forename: Peggy
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Tso
authors.forename: Anthony J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Culyer
authors.forename: Melissa
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Brouwers
authors.forename: Mark J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Dobrow
mesh_terms: D000288:Administrative Personnel; D002170:Canada; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000517:prevention & control; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D003697:Delphi Technique; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D017144:Focus Groups; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening; D011050:Policy Making; D011640:Public Policy; D017150:Public Sector; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic