title: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Now nearly 2 decades into the laparoscopic era, nationwide laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates remain around 5% to 10%. We analyzed patient- and surgeon-specific factors that may impact the decision to convert to open.
  
  
  METHODS
  We retrospectively analyzed 2205 LCs performed at a large tertiary community hospital over a 52 month period (May 2004 through October 2008).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The overall conversion rate was 4.9%. The most common reason for conversion was adhesions, and the majority of these patients had prior abdominal surgery. Males and patients >50 years old had a significantly higher likelihood of open conversion. The conversion rate of high-volume surgeons (≥100 total cases) in comparison to low-volume surgeons (40 to 99 total cases) was significantly lower. Conversion rates were lower among surgeons with fellowship training and those who completed residency training after 1990. Interestingly, the percentage of conversions due to technical difficulty was lower among those with fellowship training but higher among those who completed training after 1990.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Conversion occurred in ∼5% of all laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Males, patients >50 years old, and cases performed by low-volume surgeons had a higher likelihood of conversion. Other surgeon-specific factors did not have a significant impact on conversion rate.
authors: Department of Surgery, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA.
authors: Sujit Vijay
authors: SV
authors: Sakpal
authors: Supreet Singh
authors: SS
authors: Bindra
authors: Ronald S
authors: RS
authors: Chamberlain
references: Am J Surg. 1995 Jul;170(1):55-9
references: 7793496
references: J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):101-25
references: 8000648
references: Am J Surg. 2001 Sep;182(3):250-3
references: 11587686
references: Br J Surg. 2005 Jan;92(1):44-9
references: 15584058
references: N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):403-8
references: 8284007
references: Indian J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):16-8
references: 15778520
references: J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;10(7):1081-91
references: 16843880
references: Lancet. 2000 Nov 11;356(9242):1632-7
references: 11089821
references: J Laparoendosc Surg. 1996 Jun;6(3):171-4
references: 8807518
references: J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Dec;4(6):419-27
references: 7881146
references: World J Surg. 2006 Sep;30(9):1698-704
references: 16927065
references: Surg Endosc. 2004 Jan;18(1):97-101
references: 14569455
references: Curr Probl Surg. 1991 Sep;28(9):581-655
references: 1831416
references: J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;6(6):800-5
references: 12504217
references: Arch Surg. 2004 Nov;139(11):1215-20
references: 15545569
references: J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008 Sep;17(3):309-13
references: 18836625
references: N Engl J Med. 1991 Apr 18;324(16):1073-8
references: 1826143
references: Surg Endosc. 2002 Jun;16(6):954-6
references: 12163962
references: World J Surg. 1993 Jan-Feb;17(1):3-7
references: 8447137
references: Am J Surg. 1993 Jan;165(1):9-14
references: 8418705
references: Can J Surg. 2009 Aug;52(4):291-294
references: 19680513
references: World J Surg. 1999 Apr;23(4):332-3
references: 10030855
references: Surg Endosc. 1995 Jan;9(1):25-8
references: 7725209
references: Ann Surg. 1996 Nov;224(5):609-20
references: 8916876
references: Arch Surg. 1996 Jan;131(1):98-101
references: 8546587
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD006231
references: 17054285
references: Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):700-5
references: 11591971
references: World J Surg. 2002 May;26(5):598-601
references: 12098053
references: Br J Surg. 2006 Feb;93(2):158-68
references: 16432812
references: Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):195
references: 1531912
references: NIH Consens Statement. 1992 Sep 14-16;10(3):1-28
references: 1301217
references: Semin Laparosc Surg. 2003 Sep;10(3):141-8
references: 14551656
references: Am J Surg. 2004 Sep;188(3):205-11
references: 15450821