title: A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults.
abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of BIA in the measurement of total body composition and regional fat and the fat free mass in the healthy young adults. Four hundred and three healthy young adults (167 women and 236 men) aged 18-29 years were recruited from the Mid-West region of Ireland. Multi frequency, eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were used to measure the total body and segmental (arm, leg and trunk) fat mass and the fat free mass. BIA was found to underestimate the percentage total body fat in men and women (p < 0.001). This underestimate increased in men with >24.6% body fat and women with >32% body fat (p < 0.001). Fat tissue mass in the trunk segment was overestimated by 2.1 kg (p < 0.001) in men and underestimated by 0.4 kg (p < 0.001) in women. BIA was also found to underestimate the fat free mass in the appendages by 1.0 kg (p < 0.001) in men and 0.9 kg (p < 0.001) in women. Compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis underestimates the total body fat mass and overestimates fat free mass in healthy young adults. BIA should, therefore, be used with caution in the measurement of total body composition in women and men with >25% total body fat. Though statistically significant, the small difference (~ 4%) between the methods indicates that the BIA may be used interchangeably with DXA in the measurement of appendicular fat free mass in healthy young adults.
authors: Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. siobhan.leahy@ul.ie
authors: Siobhan
authors: S
authors: Leahy
authors: Cian
authors: C
authors: O'Neill
authors: Rhoda
authors: R
authors: Sohun
authors: Philip
authors: P
authors: Jakeman
references: Nutrition. 2002 Jan;18(1):66-70
references: 11827768
references: Physiol Rev. 2000 Apr;80(2):649-80
references: 10747204
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jan;81(1):74-8
references: 15640463
references: J Clin Densitom. 2009 Jan-Mar;12(1):95-102
references: 19028125
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998 Feb;52(2):94-7
references: 9505152
references: Ann Hum Biol. 2003 Jul-Aug;30(4):380-91
references: 12881138
references: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998 Sep;22(9):854-60
references: 9756243
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Aug;60(8):938-41
references: 16482076
references: Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
references: 2868172
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 Oct;62(4):730-4
references: 7572700
references: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Aug;97(2):509-14
references: 15075304
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1993 Nov;58(5):589-91
references: 8237861
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 May;904:335-8
references: 10865766
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Sep;72(3):694-701
references: 10966886
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 May;63(5):619-26
references: 18285806
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 1988 Dec;42(12):1017-22
references: 3234328
references: Clin Nutr. 2004 Oct;23(5):1226-43
references: 15380917
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Nov;58(11):1479-84
references: 15138459
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001 Nov;55(11):973-9
references: 11641746
references: Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Jan;57(1):123-9
references: 20692749