title: Safe laparoscopic removal of a 3200 gram fibroid uterus.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Hysterectomy using minimally invasive techniques yields fewer complications, less blood loss, and quicker recovery time compared with traditional abdominal hysterectomy. Despite these advantages, 65% of all hysterectomies in the United States are still performed using traditional laparotomy, and many clinicians still exclude patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery, significant obesity, or a large fibroid uterus from these procedures. Among physicians skilled in minimally invasive surgery, the prior largest uteri removed included a 2421g uterus removed vaginally, and a 2418g uterus removed via hand-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
  
  
  METHODS
  We performed a laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy on a significantly obese 50-year-old woman with a 3200g uterus. The patient required a 2-day hospital stay and recovered unremarkably. The patient was able to return to work within one week and quickly returned to activities of daily life.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In the hands of experienced minimally invasive surgeons, laparotomy can be avoided in almost all instances of hysterectomy for benign disease.
authors: Arizona Regional Medical Center, Mesa, Arizona, USA. mdzc@comcast.net
authors: Richard H
authors: RH
authors: Demir
authors: Gregory J
authors: GJ
authors: Marchand
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;81(6):1022-4
references: 8497344
references: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Apr;103(4):345-50
references: 8605132
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec;80(6):895-901
references: 1448255
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):229-34
references: 11814502
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1091-5
references: 17978124
references: BMJ. 2004 Jan 17;328(7432):129
references: 14711749
references: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998 Apr;8(2):99-103
references: 9617971
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;180(4):955-62
references: 10203664
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):321-6
references: 16055582
references: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 May;80(5):383-91
references: 11328212
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1041-1048
references: 20168105
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;92(3):321-6
references: 9721763
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1215-7
references: 17978148