title: Phylogeny, evolutionary trends and classification of the Spathelia-Ptaeroxylon clade: morphological and molecular insights.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The Spathelia-Ptaeroxylon clade is a group of morphologically diverse plants that have been classified together as a result of molecular phylogenetic studies. The clade is currently included in Rutaceae and recognized at a subfamilial level (Spathelioideae) despite the fact that most of its genera have traditionally been associated with other families and that there are no obvious morphological synapomorphies for the clade. The aim of the present study is to construct phylogenetic trees for the Spathelia-Ptaeroxylon clade and to investigate anatomical characters in order to decide whether it should be kept in Rutaceae or recognized at the familial level. Anatomical characters were plotted on a cladogram to help explain character evolution within the group. Moreover, phylogenetic relationships and generic limits within the clade are also addressed.
  
  
  METHODS
  A species-level phylogenetic analysis of the Spathelia-Ptaeroxylon clade based on five plastid DNA regions (rbcL, atpB, trnL-trnF, rps16 and psbA-trnH) was conducted using Bayesian, maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods. Leaf and seed anatomical characters of all genera were (re)investigated by light and scanning electron microscopy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  With the exception of Spathelia, all genera of the Spathelila-Ptaeroxylon clade are monophyletic. The typical leaf and seed anatomical characters of Rutaceae were found. Further, the presence of oil cells in the leaves provides a possible synapomorphy for the clade.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The Spathelia-Ptaeroxylon clade is well placed in Rutaceae and it is reasonable to unite the genera into one subfamily (Spathelioideae). We propose a new tribal classification of Spathelioideae. A narrow circumscription of Spathelia is established to make the genus monophyletic, and Sohnreyia is resurrected to accommodate the South American species of Spathelia. The most recent common ancestor of Spathelioideae probably had leaves with secretory cavities and oil cells, haplostemonous flowers with appendaged staminal filaments, and a tracheidal tegmen.
authors: Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis (section NHN), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. appelhans@hortus.leidenuniv.nl
authors: M S
authors: MS
authors: Appelhans
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Smets
authors: S G
authors: SG
authors: Razafimandimbison
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Haevermans
authors: E J
authors: EJ
authors: van Marle
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Couloux
authors: H
authors: H
authors: Rabarison
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Randrianarivelojosia
authors: P J A
authors: PJ
authors: Kessler
references: Syst Biol. 2004 Oct;53(5):793-808
references: 15545256
references: Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-86
references: 10547847
references: Biol Pharm Bull. 2006 Feb;29(2):191-201
references: 16462017
references: Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Nov;17(5):1105-9
references: 1932684
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Aug;44(2):724-40
references: 17512758
references: Phytochemistry. 2003 Sep;64(2):631-5
references: 12943787
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Apr;19(4):432-7
references: 11919284
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Oct;57(1):258-65
references: 20601002
references: Phytochemistry. 2004 Nov;65(21):2929-34
references: 15501263
references: Phytochemistry. 2007 Nov-Dec;68(22-24):2896-903
references: 17686500
references: Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
references: 14530136
references: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references: 12912839
references: Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):783-791
references: 28561359
references: Syst Biol. 1998 Dec;47(4):545-67
references: 12066301
references: J Nat Prod. 2000 Jul;63(7):1015-8
references: 10924191
references: Am J Bot. 1999 Aug;86(8):1191-9
references: 10449399
references: Fitoterapia. 2003 Dec;74(7-8):638-42
references: 14630167
references: Tetrahedron Lett. 1967 Jun;23:2147-51
references: 6047535
references: J Nat Prod. 1987 Jan-Feb;50(1):102-7
references: 3598592
references: Acta Crystallogr C. 2000 Jun;56(Pt 6):711-3
references: 10902031
references: J Nat Prod. 2002 Sep;65(9):1349-52
references: 12350164
references: Phytochemistry. 1995 Sep;40(1):317-20
references: 7546553
references: J Nat Prod. 2001 Nov;64(11):1434-8
references: 11720527
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Nov;25(2):278-92
references: 12414310
references: Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2006 Jan;54(1):44-7
references: 16394547
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Sep;52(3):879-86
references: 19394432
references: Syst Biol. 2001 Jun;50(3):408-24
references: 12116583
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1993 Dec;2(4):304-14
references: 8049779
references: Am J Bot. 2008 Aug;95(8):985-1005
references: 21632420
references: Phytochemistry. 2005 Jul;66(13):1560-6
references: 16002107
references: Phytochemistry. 2002 Dec;61(8):919-22
references: 12453517
references: Syst Biol. 2000 Jun;49(2):369-81
references: 12118412
references: Biochem Syst Ecol. 2000 Aug 1;28(7):713-716
references: 10854748
references: Phytochemistry. 2003 May;63(2):185-92
references: 12711140
references: Am J Bot. 1997 Aug;84(8):1120
references: 21708667
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
references: 15034147