title: The evolution of reproductive isolation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite, the freshwater snail Physa.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The cosmopolitan freshwater snail Physa acuta has recently found widespread use as a model organism for the study of mating systems and reproductive allocation. Mitochondrial DNA phylogenies suggest that Physa carolinae, recently described from the American southeast, is a sister species of P. acuta. The divergence of the acuta/carolinae ancestor from the more widespread P. pomilia appears to be somewhat older, and the split between a hypothetical acuta/carolinae/pomilia ancestor and P. gyrina appears older still.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Here we report the results of no-choice mating experiments yielding no evidence of hybridization between gyrina and any of four other populations (pomilia, carolinae, Philadelphia acuta, or Charleston acuta), nor between pomilia and carolinae. Crosses between pomilia and both acuta populations yielded sterile F1 progeny with reduced viability, while crosses between carolinae and both acuta populations yielded sterile F1 hybrids of normal viability. A set of mate-choice tests also revealed significant sexual isolation between gyrina and all four of our other Physa populations, between pomilia and carolinae, and between pomilia and Charleston acuta, but not between pomilia and the acuta population from Philadelphia, nor between carolinae and either acuta population. These observations are consistent with the origin of hybrid sterility prior to hybrid inviability, and a hypothesis that speciation between pomilia and acuta may have been reinforced by selection for prezygotic reproductive isolation in sympatry.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We propose a two-factor model for the evolution of postzygotic reproductive incompatibility in this set of five Physa populations consistent with the Dobzhansky-Muller model of speciation, and a second two-factor model for the evolution of sexual incompatibility. Under these models, species trees may be said to correspond with gene trees in American populations of the freshwater snail, Physa.
authors: Department of Biology, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424, USA. dillonr@cofc.edu
authors: Robert T
authors: RT
authors: Dillon
authors: Amy R
authors: AR
authors: Wethington
authors: Charles
authors: C
authors: Lydeard
references: Evolution. 2001 Jun;55(6):1085-94
references: 11475044
references: Evolution. 2002 Jun;56(6):1168-83
references: 12144018
references: Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Dec;95(6):428-36
references: 16175196
references: Am Nat. 2003 Sep;162(3):318-31
references: 12970840
references: Biochem Genet. 1994 Apr;32(3-4):75-82
references: 7980386
references: Evolution. 2004 Aug;58(8):1865-70
references: 15446440
references: Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):375-87
references: 8436278
references: Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Nov;83 ( Pt 5):503-8
references: 10620021
references: Evolution. 1998 Oct;52(5):1493-1500
references: 28565374
references: Annu Rev Genet. 1994;28:283-308
references: 7893128
references: Evolution. 1974 Dec;28(4):576-592
references: 28564832
references: Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1913-31
references: 11102384
references: Evolution. 2008 Dec;62(12):3178-84
references: 18786192
references: Evolution. 1998 Dec;52(6):1811-1820
references: 28565326
references: J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1631-40
references: 16910992
references: J Evol Biol. 2006 Nov;19(6):1979-94
references: 17040396
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):330-343
references: 11403865
references: Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):30-6
references: 10937180
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(7):2715-9
references: 2320584
references: Evolution. 2002 Jan;56(1):191-8
references: 11913663
references: Syst Biol. 2008 Feb;57(1):131-40
references: 18300026
references: Evolution. 2005 Aug;59(8):1754-67
references: 16329245
references: Evolution. 1989 Mar;43(2):362-381
references: 28568554
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 7;270(1520):1193-202
references: 12816659
references: Evolution. 2008 Apr;62(4):900-16
references: 18208568
references: Evolution. 2002 Oct;56(10):2083-9
references: 12449494
references: Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4):474-88
references: 14582009
references: Evolution. 1998 Aug;52(4):1093-1103
references: 28565231
references: Evolution. 2004 Jul;58(7):1424-33
references: 15341146
references: Syst Biol. 2006 Oct;55(5):729-39
references: 17060195
references: Anim Behav. 1999 Dec;58(6):1247-51
references: 10600146
references: Evolution. 2003 Feb;57(2):317-27
references: 12683528
references: Evolution. 2006 Sep;60(9):1816-24
references: 17089966
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2006 May 09;6:40
references: 16684352
references: Evolution. 2007 Nov;61(11):2655-70
references: 17894808
references: Evolution. 2006 Dec;60(12):2585-603
references: 17263119
references: Syst Biol. 2009 Feb;58(1):35-54
references: 20525567
references: Evolution. 2003 Jun;57(6):1411-8
references: 12894948
references: Evolution. 1993 Jun;47(3):778-788
references: 28567909
references: Evolution. 1997 Feb;51(1):295-303
references: 28568795
references: Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):181-184
references: 10413555
references: Genetics. 2003 Mar;163(3):955-72
references: 12663535
references: Genetics. 2008 Nov;180(3):1593-608
references: 18791233