title: Can biomechanical variables predict improvement in crouch gait?
abstract: Many patients respond positively to treatments for crouch gait, yet surgical outcomes are inconsistent and unpredictable. In this study, we developed a multivariable regression model to determine if biomechanical variables and other subject characteristics measured during a physical exam and gait analysis can predict which subjects with crouch gait will demonstrate improved knee kinematics on a follow-up gait analysis. We formulated the model and tested its performance by retrospectively analyzing 353 limbs of subjects who walked with crouch gait. The regression model was able to predict which subjects would demonstrate 'Improved' and 'Unimproved' knee kinematics with over 70% accuracy, and was able to explain approximately 49% of the variance in subjects' change in knee flexion between gait analyses. We found that improvement in stance phase knee flexion was positively associated with three variables that were drawn from knowledge about the biomechanical contributors to crouch gait: (i) adequate hamstrings lengths and velocities, possibly achieved via hamstrings lengthening surgery, (ii) normal tibial torsion, possibly achieved via tibial derotation osteotomy, and (iii) sufficient muscle strength.
authors: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. jenhicks@stanford.edu
authors: Jennifer L
authors: JL
authors: Hicks
authors: Scott L
authors: SL
authors: Delp
authors: Michael H
authors: MH
authors: Schwartz
references: J Orthop Res. 1995 Jan;13(1):96-104
references: 7853110
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Nov;86(8):1170-5
references: 15568532
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Dec;28(8):879-83
references: 19034182
references: Gait Posture. 2007 Oct;26(4):546-52
references: 17229573
references: J Biomech. 2005 Nov;38(11):2181-9
references: 16154404
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;31(2):422-9
references: 11980807
references: J Biomech. 2010 Aug 10;43(11):2099-105
references: 20493489
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 2002 Mar-Apr;22(2):169-72
references: 11856923
references: Acta Orthop. 2007 Feb;78(1):74-80
references: 17453395
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Sep;27(6):658-67
references: 17717467
references: Gait Posture. 2000 Oct;12(2):114-21
references: 10998607
references: Gait Posture. 2009 Aug;30(2):155-60
references: 19535249
references: J Biomech. 2008;41(5):960-7
references: 18291404
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 1998 Jan-Feb;18(1):81-7
references: 9449107
references: J Biomech. 2006;39(8):1498-506
references: 15923009
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Jan-Feb;25(1):84-8
references: 15614066
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 1999 May-Jun;19(3):366-75
references: 10344322
references: Gait Posture. 2003 Apr;17(2):113-8
references: 12633770
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 1998 Nov-Dec;18(6):712-8
references: 9821124
references: Gait Posture. 2008 Aug;28(2):316-22
references: 18358723
references: Ann Biomed Eng. 2001 Mar;29(3):263-74
references: 11310788
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88(12):2653-64
references: 17142416
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6):759-64
references: 11097250
references: Gait Posture. 2008 Oct;28(3):351-7
references: 18565753
references: Iowa Orthop J. 2006;26:27-32
references: 16789444
references: Gait Posture. 2006 Apr;23(3):273-81
references: 15964759
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Apr-May;28(3):324-9
references: 18362798