title: Use and feasibility of delayed prescribing for respiratory tract infections: a questionnaire survey.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Delayed prescribing of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) lowers the amount of antibiotics consumed. Several national treatment guidelines on RTIs recommend the strategy. When advocating treatment innovations, the feasibility and credibility of the innovation must be taken into account. The objective of this study was to explore GPs use and patients uptake of wait-and-see prescriptions for RTIs, and to investigate the feasibility of the strategy from GPs' and patients' perspectives.
  
  
  METHODS
  Questionnaire survey among Norwegian GPs issuing and patients receiving a wait-and-see-prescription for RTIs. Patients reported symptoms, confidence and antibiotics consumption, GPs reported diagnoses, reason for issuing a wait-and-see-prescription and their opinion about the method.
  
  
  RESULTS
  304 response pairs from consultations with 49 GPs were received. The patient response rate was 80%. The most common diagnosis for the GPs to issue a wait-and-see prescription was sinusitis (33%) and otitis (21%). 46% of the patients reported to consume the antibiotics. When adjusted for other factors, the diagnosis did not predict antibiotic consumption, but both being 16 years or more (p = 0,006) and reporting to have a fever (p = 0,012) doubled the odds of antibiotic consumption, while feeling very ill more than quadrupled the odds (p = 0,002). In 210 cases (69%), the GP found delayed prescribing a very reasonable strategy, and 270 patients (89%) would prefer to receive a wait-and-see prescription in a similar situation in the future. The GPs found delayed prescribing very reasonable most frequently in cases of sinusitis (79%, p = 0,007) and least frequently in cases of lower RTIs (49%, p = 0,002).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most patients and GPs are satisfied with the delayed prescribing strategy. The patients' age, symptoms and malaise are more important than the diagnosis in predicting antibiotic consumption. The GP's view of the method as a reasonable approach depends on the patient's diagnosis. In our setting, delayed prescribing seems to be a feasible strategy, especially in cases of sinusitis and otitis. Educational efforts to promote delayed prescribing in similar settings should focus on these diagnoses.
authors: Antibiotic Center for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, PO Box 1130 Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway. sigurd.hoye@medisin.uio.no
authors: Sigurd
authors: S
authors: Høye
authors: Jan C
authors: JC
authors: Frich
authors: Morten
authors: M
authors: Lindbæk
references: Respir Med. 2005 Mar;99(3):255-61
references: 15733498
references: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Oct 23;128(20):2340-2
references: 19096491
references: Lancet. 2005 Feb 12-18;365(9459):579-87
references: 15708101
references: Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(1):17-21
references: 18297558
references: JAMA. 2006 Sep 13;296(10):1235-41
references: 16968847
references: J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Feb;59(2):292-6
references: 17110392
references: BMJ. 1997 Mar 8;314(7082):722-7
references: 9116551
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Oct -Nov;48(2):161-9
references: 12401419
references: BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):336-42
references: 11159657
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Dec;60(581):907-12
references: 21144201
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD000219
references: 14973951
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Mar 23;10:20
references: 19309493
references: BMJ. 2005 Aug 6;331(7512):301-2
references: 16081428
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Mar;51(464):200-5
references: 11255901
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Nov;53(496):845-50
references: 14702903
references: J Fam Pract. 2002 Apr;51(4):324-8
references: 11978254
references: Med J Aust. 2004 Mar 15;180(S6):S57-60
references: 15012583
references: BMJ. 1992 Feb 1;304(6822):294-6
references: 1739831
references: Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(4):208-15
references: 19929185
references: Scand J Prim Health Care. 1998 Jun;16(2):121-7
references: 9689692
references: JAMA. 2005 Jun 22;293(24):3029-35
references: 15972565
references: BMJ. 2005 Aug 6;331(7512):328-9
references: 15967760
references: Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005 Jun;23(2):120-5
references: 16036552
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004417
references: 17636757
references: Fam Pract. 2006 Dec;23(6):618-23
references: 17035288
references: J Fam Pract. 2002 Nov;51(11):954-9
references: 12485551
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Nov 18;11:90
references: 21087469
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun 15;6:75
references: 16776824