title: Comprehension of self-report evidence-based measures of anxiety.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Given their applicability in diverse settings and for a wide range of purposes, the generalizability of self-report symptom measures is particularly important. An understudied factor in the development and validation of self-report measures is the degree to which they are difficult to comprehend. This study evaluated the difficulty of self-report measures of anxiety with respect to several domains, including formatting, length, and linguistic problems.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ninety-two evidence based measures of anxiety were evaluated for comprehension level.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The majority of anxiety measures included challenging elements of formatting, linguistic ability, and readability. Measures of obsessive-compulsive disorder were associated with the highest level of comprehension (i.e., greatest difficulty).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The validity of self-report measures relies on the ability of respondents to understand the instructions and measure items. Factors related to the comprehension of self-report measures should be included among the basic psychometric properties in measure development and validation. Future research on the development of self-report measures that can be more broadly applicable across levels of education and literacy are of particular importance to research, clinical, and public health agendas.
authors: Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. rkmchugh@bu.edu
authors: R Kathryn
authors: RK
authors: McHugh
authors: Jessica L
authors: JL
authors: Rasmussen
authors: Michael W
authors: MW
authors: Otto