title: Is adherent scar always nonpliable?
authors: Unit of Occupational Rehabilitation and Ergonomics; S. Maugeri Foundation; Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico; Scientific Institute of Veruno; Veruno, Italy (Ferriero, Vercelli) Univerzita sv Cyrila a Metoda, Trnava, Slovak Republic (Salgovic) Unit of Occupational Rehabilitation and Ergonomics; S. Maugeri Foundation; Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico; Scientific Institute of Veruno; Veruno, Italy (Sartorio, Franchignoni).
authors: Giorgio
authors: G
authors: Ferriero
authors: Stefano
authors: S
authors: Vercelli
authors: Ludovit
authors: L
authors: Salgovic
authors: Francesco
authors: F
authors: Sartorio
authors: Franco
authors: F
authors: Franchignoni
references: Perry DM, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. Current tools for noninvasive objective assessment of skin scars. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:912–923.
references: Nedelec B, Shankowsky HA, Tredget EE. Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: Comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000;21:205–212.
references: Ferriero G, Vercelli S, Salgovic L, Stissi V, Sartorio F. Validation of a new device to measure postsurgical scar adherence. Phys Ther. 2010;90:776–783.
references: Silverberg R, Johnson J, Moffat M. The effects of soft tissue mobilization on the immature burn scar: Results of a pilot study. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996;17:252–259.