title: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of safflower and the efficient recovery of transgenic plants via grafting.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is a difficult crop to genetically transform being susceptible to hyperhydration and poor in vitro root formation. In addition to traditional uses safflower has recently emerged as a broadacre platform for the production of transgenic products including modified oils and pharmaceutically active proteins. Despite commercial activities based on the genetic modification of safflower, there is no method available in the public domain describing the transformation of safflower that generates transformed T1 progeny.
  
  
  RESULTS
  An efficient and reproducible protocol has been developed with a transformation efficiency of 4.8% and 3.1% for S-317 (high oleic acid content) and WT (high linoleic acid content) genotypes respectively. An improved safflower transformation T-DNA vector was developed, including a secreted GFP to allow non-destructive assessment of transgenic shoots. Hyperhydration and necrosis of Agrobacterium-infected cotyledons was effectively controlled by using iota-carrageenan, L-cysteine and ascorbic acid. To overcome poor in vitro root formation for the first time a grafting method was developed for safflower in which ~50% of transgenic shoots develop into mature plants bearing viable transgenic T1 seed. The integration and expression of secreted GFP and hygromycin genes were confirmed by PCR, Southern and Western blot analysis. Southern blot analysis in nine independent lines indicated that 1-7 transgenes were inserted per line and T1 progeny displayed Mendelian inheritance.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This protocol demonstrates significant improvements in both the efficiency and ease of use over existing safflower transformation protocols. This is the first complete method of genetic transformation of safflower that generates stably-transformed plants and progeny, allowing this crop to benefit from modern molecular applications.
authors: CSIRO Plant Industry, PO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Craig.Wood@csiro.au.
authors: Srinivas
authors: S
authors: Belide
authors: Luch
authors: L
authors: Hac
authors: Surinder P
authors: SP
authors: Singh
authors: Allan G
authors: AG
authors: Green
authors: Craig C
authors: CC
authors: Wood
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2010 Nov;29(11):1251-60
references: 20711728
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2003 Jan;21(5):475-82
references: 12789451
references: Plant Cell Rep. 1992 Oct;11(11):581-5
references: 24213291
references: J Bacteriol. 1988 Sep;170(9):4047-54
references: 2842300
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Mar 18;94(6):2122-7
references: 9122158
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 26;103(39):14631-6
references: 16983073
references: Plant Cell Rep. 1992 Nov;11(12):632-6
references: 24213367
references: Plant J. 2003 Jun;34(5):647-59
references: 12787246
references: Plant Biotechnol J. 2011 Feb;9(2):250-63
references: 20618764
references: Plant Methods. 2010 Mar 11;6:8
references: 20222981
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jan;83(2):379-83
references: 16593648
references: Transgenic Res. 2007 Dec;16(6):771-81
references: 17273915
references: Biotechnology (N Y). 1991 Oct;9(10):963-7
references: 1368724