title: Evolutionary patterns and processes in the radiation of phyllostomid bats.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The phyllostomid bats present the most extensive ecological and phenotypic radiation known among mammal families. This group is an important model system for studies of cranial ecomorphology and functional optimisation because of the constraints imposed by the requirements of flight. A number of studies supporting phyllostomid adaptation have focused on qualitative descriptions or correlating functional variables and diet, but explicit tests of possible evolutionary mechanisms and scenarios for phenotypic diversification have not been performed. We used a combination of morphometric and comparative methods to test hypotheses regarding the evolutionary processes behind the diversification of phenotype (mandible shape and size) and diet during the phyllostomid radiation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The different phyllostomid lineages radiate in mandible shape space, with each feeding specialisation evolving towards different axes. Size and shape evolve quite independently, as the main directions of shape variation are associated with mandible elongation (nectarivores) or the relative size of tooth rows and mandibular processes (sanguivores and frugivores), which are not associated with size changes in the mandible. The early period of phyllostomid diversification is marked by a burst of shape, size, and diet disparity (before 20 Mya), larger than expected by neutral evolution models, settling later to a period of relative phenotypic and ecological stasis. The best fitting evolutionary model for both mandible shape and size divergence was an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with five adaptive peaks (insectivory, carnivory, sanguivory, nectarivory and frugivory).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The radiation of phyllostomid bats presented adaptive and non-adaptive components nested together through the time frame of the family's evolution. The first 10 My of the radiation were marked by strong phenotypic and ecological divergence among ancestors of modern lineages, whereas the remaining 20 My were marked by stasis around a number of probable adaptive peaks. A considerable amount of cladogenesis and speciation in this period is likely to be the result of non-adaptive allopatric divergence or adaptations to peaks within major dietary categories.
authors: Department of Biological Sciences and Hull York Medical School, The University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK. lrmont@uenf.br
authors: Leandro R
authors: LR
authors: Monteiro
authors: Marcelo R
authors: MR
authors: Nogueira
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Oct;49(1):44-58
references: 18662791
references: Evolution. 2009 Jun;63(6):1557-73
references: 19154390
references: Syst Biol. 2006 Apr;55(2):228-44
references: 16551580
references: Evolution. 2010 Mar 1;64(3):724-44
references: 19804403
references: Science. 2005 Jan 28;307(5709):527-8
references: 15681371
references: J Evol Biol. 2009 Jul;22(7):1367-75
references: 19508410
references: Evolution. 2008 Aug;62(8):1965-77
references: 18452574
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2007 Jul;47(1):137-46
references: 21672826
references: Science. 2009 Feb 6;323(5915):732-7
references: 19197052
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Jun 04;10:165
references: 20525339
references: J Theor Biol. 2009 Jan 7;256(1):96-103
references: 18834892
references: Dev Dyn. 2006 May;235(5):1256-91
references: 16598716
references: Evolution. 1988 Mar;42(2):363-374
references: 28567841
references: Am Nat. 2009 May;173(5):543-53
references: 19296733
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 29;355(1403):1599-605
references: 11127905
references: Am Nat. 2004 Dec;164(6):683-695
references: 29641928
references: Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):961-4
references: 12920297
references: Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 1;24(1):129-31
references: 18006550
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Mar;34(3):601-15
references: 15683932
references: Evolution. 2001 Nov 11;55(11):2143-60
references: 11794776
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1271-8
references: 12065044
references: J Exp Biol. 2003 Jul;206(Pt 13):2117-23
references: 12771161
references: Science. 2001 Apr 27;292(5517):686-93
references: 11326091
references: Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):701-2
references: 17151655
references: Am Nat. 2010 Mar;175(3):289-301
references: 20095825
references: Evolution. 2005 Sep;59(9):2000-16
references: 16261737
references: Evolution. 2005 Oct;59(10):2243-55
references: 16405167
references: J Evol Biol. 2009 Nov;22(11):2131-45
references: 19732259
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):192-6
references: 15117008
references: Evolution. 2005 Feb;59(2):409-21
references: 15807425
references: Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1341-1351
references: 28568616
references: J Exp Biol. 2008 Jan;211(Pt 1):86-91
references: 18083736
references: Bioessays. 2009 Dec;31(12):1337-46
references: 19921661
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Dec;49(3):749-59
references: 18926914
references: Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90
references: 14734327
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2147-52
references: 19324745
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Apr 28;4:11
references: 15115541
references: Multivariate Behav Res. 2009 May;44(3):362-388
references: 20234802
references: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1991 May;66(2):101-57
references: 1863686
references: Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2005 Apr;283(2):319-30
references: 15747350
references: Evolution. 1997 Dec;51(6):1699-1711
references: 28565128