title: Basing care reforms on evidence: the Kenya health sector costing model.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The Government of the Republic of Kenya is in the process of implementing health care reforms. However, poor knowledge about costs of health care services is perceived as a major obstacle towards evidence-based, effective and efficient health care reforms. Against this background, the Ministry of Health of Kenya in cooperation with its development partners conducted a comprehensive costing exercise and subsequently developed the Kenya Health Sector Costing Model in order to fill this data gap.
  
  
  METHODS
  Based on standard methodology of costing of health care services in developing countries, standard questionnaires and analyses were employed in 207 health care facilities representing different trustees (e.g. Government, Faith Based/Nongovernmental, private-for-profit organisations), levels of care and regions (urban, rural). In addition, a total of 1369 patients were randomly selected and asked about their demand-sided costs. A standard step-down costing methodology was applied to calculate the costs per service unit and per diagnosis of the financial year 2006/2007.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The total costs of essential health care services in Kenya were calculated as 690 million Euros or 18.65 Euro per capita. 54% were incurred by public sector facilities, 17% by Faith Based and other Nongovernmental facilities and 23% in the private sector. Some 6% of the total cost is due to the overall administration provided directly by the Ministry and its decentralised organs. Around 37% of this cost is absorbed by salaries and 22% by drugs and medical supplies. Generally, costs of lower levels of care are lower than of higher levels, but health centres are an exemption. They have higher costs per service unit than district hospitals.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of this study signify that the costs of health care services are quite high compared with the Kenyan domestic product, but a major share are fixed costs so that an increasing coverage does not necessarily increase the health care costs proportionally. Instead, productivity will rise in particular in under-utilized private health care institutions. The results of this study also show that private-for-profit health care facilities are not only the luxurious providers catering exclusively for the rich but also play an important role in the service provision for the poorer population. The study findings also demonstrated a high degree of cost variability across private providers, suggesting differences in quality and efficiencies.
authors: University of Greifswald, Faculty of Law and Economics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Str, 70, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany. steffen.flessa@uni-greifswald.de
authors: Steffen
authors: S
authors: Flessa
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Moeller
authors: Tim
authors: T
authors: Ensor
authors: Klaus
authors: K
authors: Hornetz
references: Health Policy Plan. 2000 Dec;15(4):432-40
references: 11124247
references: Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2003 Feb 26;1(1):1
references: 12773220
references: Soc Sci Med. 2002 Sep;55(6):895-906
references: 12220092
references: Health Policy Plan. 2001 Mar;16(1):113-21
references: 11238438
references: Health Policy. 2004 Mar;67(3):293-307
references: 15036817
references: Health Policy Plan. 2005 Jul;20(4):252-9
references: 15965037
references: Health Policy Plan. 1987 Sep;2(3):255-7
references: 10284129
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Fall;12(4):721-34
references: 9136479
references: Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(3):149-55
references: 14984280
references: J Soc Health Syst. 1992;3(4):61-74
references: 1288675
references: Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1971 Oct;49(4):509-38
references: 5155251
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Spring;19(2):396-406
references: 12862196
references: Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(7):443-54
references: 12093300
references: Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(4):263-71
references: 12600221
references: Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2003 Feb 26;1(1):3
references: 12773218
references: Health Care Manag Sci. 2008 Sep;11(3):215-27
references: 18826000
references: Singapore Med J. 2007 Feb;48(2):143-7
references: 17304394
references: Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006 Mar;208(3):213-24
references: 16498229
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):167-9
references: 11953797
references: Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2005 Jul 14;3:6
references: 16018806
references: Health Policy Plan. 1995 Sep;10(3):271-83
references: 10151844
references: J Crit Care. 2002 Sep;17(3):181-6
references: 12297994
references: East Afr Med J. 2008 Jun;85(6):292-300
references: 18817026
references: Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Jan-Mar;26(1):e30-47
references: 22392797
references: Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Sep;60(3 Suppl):74S-91S
references: 15095547
references: Health Policy Plan. 2004 Jul;19(4):242-5
references: 15208280
references: Health Policy Plan. 2001 Jun;16(2):180-6
references: 11358919
references: Malar J. 2009 May 18;8:106
references: 19450282
references: Health Policy Plan. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 1:i85-i93
references: 16306074
references: Health Care Manag Sci. 2006 Aug;9(3):287-94
references: 17016935
references: Health Policy Plan. 1995 Jun;10(2):164-70
references: 10143454
references: Health Policy. 2001 Nov;58(2):175-86
references: 11551665
references: Health Policy Plan. 2004 Mar;19(2):127-35
references: 14982891
references: Health Policy Plan. 2000 Jun;15(2):230-4
references: 10837047
references: Health Policy Plan. 2002 Mar;17(1):112-8
references: 11861593