title: The benefits and protective effects of behavioural treatment for dysgraphia in a case of primary progressive aphasia.
abstract: BACKGROUND: Spoken and written language difficulties are the predominant symptoms in the progressive neurodegenerative disease referred to as primary progressive aphasia (PPA). There has been very little research on the effectiveness of intervention on spoken language impairments in this context and none directed specifically at progressive written language impairment.  AIMS: To examine the effectiveness of behavioural intervention for dysgraphia in a case of primary progressive aphasia.  METHODS #ENTITYSTARTX00026; PROCEDURES: We carried out a longitudinal single-case study that allowed us to examine the effectiveness of a non-intensive spell-study-spell intervention procedure. We did so by comparing performance on four sets of words: trained, repeated, homework, and control words at five evaluations: baseline, during intervention, after the intervention, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.  OUTCOMES #ENTITYSTARTX00026; RESULTS: We find that: (1) at the end of the intervention, Trained words show a small but statistically significant improvement relative to baseline and an advantage in accuracy over Control, Homework, and Repeated word sets. (2) All word sets exhibited a decline in accuracy from the end of treatment to the 6-month follow-up evaluation, consistent with the degenerative nature of the illness. Nonetheless, accuracy on Trained words continued to be superior to that of Control words and not statistically different from pre-intervention baseline levels. (3) Repeated testing and practice at home yielded modest numerical advantages relative to Control words; but these differences were, for many comparisons, not statistically significant. (4) At 12 months post-intervention, all words sets had significantly declined relative to pre-intervention baselines and performance on the four sets was comparable.  CONCLUSIONS: This investigation documents-for the first time-that behavioural intervention can provide both immediate and short-term benefits for dysgraphia in the context of primary progressive aphasia.
authors: Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
authors: Brenda
authors: B
authors: Rapp
authors: Brian
authors: B
authors: Glucroft
references: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(7):759-72
references: 12631527
references: Neurocase. 2003 Jun;9(3):251-60
references: 12925931
references: Brain Lang. 2003 Dec;87(3):355-60
references: 14642538
references: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2006 Feb;16(1):1-37
references: 16509517
references: Brain Lang. 1985 Jan;24(1):36-58
references: 3971135
references: Ann Neurol. 2003;54 Suppl 5:S11-4
references: 12833362
references: Ann Neurol. 1982 Jun;11(6):592-8
references: 7114808
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Aug;70(8):632-6
references: 2764694
references: Clin Commun Disord. 1992 Winter;2(1):19-33
references: 1301890
references: Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001 Oct-Dec;36(4):471-88
references: 11802498
references: Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10(4):205-14
references: 14690801
references: Arch Neurol. 1989 Jan;46(1):65-8
references: 2910263
references: J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
references: 1202204
references: Neuropsychologia. 1993 Nov;31(11):1147-58
references: 8107977
references: Arch Neurol. 1990 Dec;47(12):1329-35
references: 2252450
references: Neurology. 1994 Nov;44(11):2065-72
references: 7969961
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Oct;46(5):1038-60
references: 14575342
references: Baillieres Clin Neurol. 1992 Nov;1(3):583-609
references: 1344204
references: J Speech Hear Disord. 1980 Feb;45(1):45-58
references: 7354630
references: Neuropsychologia. 1997 Apr;35(4):533-45
references: 9106281
references: Int J Rehabil Res. 2006 Jun;29(2):151-3
references: 16609327
references: Brain Lang. 1997 Dec;60(3):381-406
references: 9398390
references: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;67(3):334-44
references: 10449556