title: Successful recruitment to trials: a phased approach to opening gates and building bridges.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The pragmatic randomised controlled trial is widely regarded as the gold standard method for evaluating the effectiveness of health care interventions. Successful conduct of trials and generalisation of findings depends upon efficient recruitment of representative samples, which often requires the collaboration of 'gatekeepers' who mediate access to potential participants. Effective negotiation of gatekeeping is thus vital to process and outcomes of trials and the quality of evidence. Whilst relevant literature contains discussion of the problems of recruitment and gatekeeping, little is known about how recruitment can be optimised and factors leading to successful recruitment.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  As practised researchers with first-hand experience of gatekeeping, we were aware that some researchers recruit more effectively than others and curious about the ingredients of success. With the goal of developing practical guidance, we conducted a series of workshops with 19 expert researchers to investigate and map successful recruitment. Workshops were digitally recorded and transcribed. Analysis of discussion supported modelling of effective recruitment as a process involving three phases, each comprising two key tasks. Successful negotiation of set-up, alliance, and exchange require judicious deployment of interpersonal skills in an appropriately assertive manner. Researcher flexibility and credibility are vital for success, such that a foundation for rapprochement between the worlds of research and practice is established.Our model provides a framework to support design and implementation of recruitment activities and will enable trouble shooting and support recruitment, supervision and training of effective researchers. This, in turn will support delivery of trials on time and on budget, maximising return on investment in the production of evidence.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Pragmatic trials are central to development of evidence based health care but often failure to recruit the necessary sample in a timely manner means many fail or require costly extensions. Gatekeeping is implicated in this. Drawing on the knowledge of 19 expert researchers, we argue that successful researchers are resourceful and personable, judiciously deploying interpersonal skills and expertise to engage with gatekeepers and establish a shared objective. We propose that understanding recruitment as a phased process can enhance design and conduct of trials, supporting completion on time, on budget.
authors: Rethink, 89 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TP, UK. susan.patterson@imperial.ac.uk
authors: Sue
authors: S
authors: Patterson
authors: Hilary
authors: H
authors: Mairs
authors: Rohan
authors: R
authors: Borschmann
references: Palliat Med. 2004 Jul;18(5):452-9
references: 15332423
references: Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Jan;30(1):40-6
references: 18718555
references: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 Aug 07;8:36
references: 18687110
references: Med Care. 2001 Dec;39(12):1339-44
references: 11717575
references: Trials. 2006 May 17;7:16
references: 16707011
references: Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(20):1-143
references: 10683591
references: Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Sep;30(5):387
references: 19520190
references: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 10;289(6454):1281-4
references: 6437520
references: Control Clin Trials. 1997 Aug;18(4):328-52
references: 9257072
references: Trials. 2006 Apr 07;7:9
references: 16603070
references: J Ment Health. 2010 Dec;19(6):532-41
references: 21121823
references: Support Care Cancer. 2008 Dec;16(12):1397-405
references: 18449574