title: Sample taking during orthopedic surgery: sensitivity and specificity using the BACTEC blood culture system.
abstract: The use of blood culture systems for sterile body fluids other than blood has proven to be superior to routine culture methods. This study was conducted in order to assess the performance of the BACTEC blood culture system compared to swab/tissue sample collection for the detection of infection from intraoperative samples taken during surgical procedures. Sensitivity was determined by taking samples (BACTEC and swab/tissue samples) from patients with clinically evident infection (Infection group). Specificity was tested by taking the same sample sets from patients who had aseptic operations with no history of infection (Control group). The sensitivity was found to be much higher for the BACTEC group (50 isolates from 56 samples, sensitivity: 89%) compared to the swab/tissue samples (29 isolates out of 56 samples, sensitivity: 52%). The specificity was lower in the BACTEC group (32 isolates out of 44 samples, specificity: 27%) compared to the swab/tissue samples (1 isolate out of 44 samples, specificity: 98%). We conclude that BACTEC is useful for intraoperative sample collection in cases of low-grade infection. However, it is less specific and there is always the possibility for contamination. Therefore, it is advisable to use this technique in combination with regular tissue samples.
authors: Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany. lars.podleska@uni-due.de
authors: L E
authors: LE
authors: Podleska
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Lendemans
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Schmid
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Hussmann
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Nast-Kolb
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Taeger
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Sep;73(8):1200-7
references: 1890121
references: N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1645-54
references: 15483283
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Oct;36(10):2932-9
references: 9738046
references: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Jun;64(2):213-5
references: 19304438
references: BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Sep 22;10:278
references: 20860796
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Nov;36(11):3273-7
references: 9774578
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Feb;39(2):738-9
references: 11158139
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 May;78(5):749-54
references: 8642032
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Sep;55(6):1242-50
references: 4796592
references: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Apr;53(4):1717-9
references: 19164143
references: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Nov;24(11):739-44
references: 16328558
references: J Hosp Infect. 2004 Nov;58(3):230-2
references: 15501339
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 1986 Jun;45(6):454-7
references: 3524479
references: Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37(2):151-3
references: 15773035
references: BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Feb 06;7:4
references: 17284316
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jan;(382):222-31
references: 11153992
references: J Hosp Infect. 1983 Sep;4(3):257-68
references: 6195238
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Jan;75(1):66-76
references: 8419393
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Mar;33(3):759-61
references: 7751392
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jan;28(1):124-5
references: 2405006
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jun;32(6):1488-91
references: 8077393
references: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Jun;25(6):349-53
references: 16767481