title: The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods.
abstract: Bite mark analysis offers the opportunity to identify the biter based on the individual characteristics of the dentitions. Normally, the main focus is on analysing bite mark injuries on human bodies, but also, bite marks in food may play an important role in the forensic investigation of a crime. This study presents a comparison of simulated bite marks in different kinds of food with the dentitions of the presumed biter. Bite marks were produced by six adults in slices of buttered bread, apples, different kinds of Swiss chocolate and Swiss cheese. The time-lapse influence of the bite mark in food, under room temperature conditions, was also examined. For the documentation of the bite marks and the dentitions of the biters, 3D optical surface scanning technology was used. The comparison was performed using two different software packages: the ATOS modelling and analysing software and the 3D studio max animation software. The ATOS software enables an automatic computation of the deviation between the two meshes. In the present study, the bite marks and the dentitions were compared, as well as the meshes of each bite mark which were recorded in the different stages of time lapse. In the 3D studio max software, the act of biting was animated to compare the dentitions with the bite mark. The examined food recorded the individual characteristics of the dentitions very well. In all cases, the biter could be identified, and the dentitions of the other presumed biters could be excluded. The influence of the time lapse on the food depends on the kind of food and is shown on the diagrams. However, the identification of the biter could still be performed after a period of time, based on the recorded individual characteristics of the dentitions.
authors: Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. silvio.naether@irm.unibe.ch
authors: Silvio
authors: S
authors: Naether
authors: Ursula
authors: U
authors: Buck
authors: Lorenzo
authors: L
authors: Campana
authors: Robert
authors: R
authors: Breitbeck
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Thali
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2006 May 15;159 Suppl 1:S110-20
references: 16540273
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Sep 18;180(2-3):86-92
references: 18768272
references: J Forensic Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):151-6
references: 17209928
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Sep 13;171(2-3):157-64
references: 17161568
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Sep 10;190(1-3):33-7
references: 19505780
references: Int J Legal Med. 2011 Nov;125(6):779-84
references: 20814692
references: J Forensic Sci. 2005 Jan;50(1):127-33
references: 15831006
references: J Forensic Sci. 2005 Mar;50(2):428-42
references: 15813556
references: Forensic Sci. 1975 Dec;6(3):205-15
references: 1225779
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Aug 12;135(2):115-21
references: 12927412
references: J Forensic Sci. 2010 Jan;55(1):71-6
references: 20002269
references: J Forensic Sci. 2007 May;52(3):687-91
references: 17456096
references: J Forensic Sci. 2009 Jul;54(4):909-14
references: 19486245
references: J Forensic Sci Soc. 1966 Apr;6(2):76-80
references: 5960623
references: Int J Legal Med. 1999;112(3):201-3
references: 10335888
references: J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2000 Dec;18(2):27-31
references: 11324267
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2001 Oct 15;122(1):75-8
references: 11587871
references: Int J Legal Med. 2007 Jan;121(1):9-17
references: 16391946
references: Sud Med Ekspert. 2016;59(3):58-62
references: 28635931
references: Dent Update. 2008 Jan-Feb;35(1):48-50, 53-4, 57-8 passim
references: 18277695
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jul 20;170(1):20-8
references: 16997523
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Nov 26;137(2-3):203-8
references: 14609658