title: Effects of bicycle saddle height on knee injury risk and cycling performance.
abstract: Incorrect bicycle configuration may predispose athletes to injury and reduce their cycling performance. There is disagreement within scientific and coaching communities regarding optimal configuration of bicycles for athletes. This review summarizes literature on methods for determining bicycle saddle height and the effects of bicycle saddle height on measures of cycling performance and lower limb injury risk. Peer-reviewed journals, books, theses and conference proceedings published since 1960 were searched using MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, EBSCO and Google Scholar databases, resulting in 62 references being reviewed. Keywords searched included 'body positioning', 'saddle', 'posture, 'cycling' and 'injury'. The review revealed that methods for determining optimal saddle height are varied and not well established, and have been based on relationships between saddle height and lower limb length (Hamley and Thomas, trochanteric length, length from ischial tuberosity to floor, LeMond, heel methods) or a reference range of knee joint flexion. There is limited information on the effects of saddle height on lower limb injury risk (lower limb kinematics, knee joint forces and moments and muscle mechanics), but more information on the effects of saddle height on cycling performance (performance time, energy expenditure/oxygen uptake, power output, pedal force application). Increasing saddle height can cause increased shortening of the vastii muscle group, but no change in hamstring length. Length and velocity of contraction in the soleus seems to be more affected by saddle height than that in the gastrocnemius. The majority of evidence suggested that a 5% change in saddle height affected knee joint kinematics by 35% and moments by 16%. Patellofemoral compressive force seems to be inversely related to saddle height but the effects on tibiofemoral forces are uncertain. Changes of less than 4% in trochanteric length do not seem to affect injury risk or performance. The main limitations from the reported studies are that different methods have been employed for determining saddle height, small sample sizes have been used, cyclists with low levels of expertise have mostly been evaluated and different outcome variables have been measured. Given that the occurrence of overuse knee joint pain is 50% in cyclists, future studies may focus on how saddle height can be optimized to improve cycling performance and reduce knee joint forces to reduce lower limb injury risk. On the basis of the conflicting evidence on the effects of saddle height changes on performance and lower limb injury risk in cycling, we suggest the saddle height may be set using the knee flexion angle method (25-30°) to reduce the risk of knee injuries and to minimize oxygen uptake.
authors: Sport Performance Research Institute New Zealand, School of Sport and Recreation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. rbini@aut.ac.nz
authors: Rodrigo
authors: R
authors: Bini
authors: Patria A
authors: PA
authors: Hume
authors: James L
authors: JL
authors: Croft
references: Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb;26(1):109-18
references: 9474411
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1023-7
references: 18076230
references: J Physiol. 1967 Jul;191(2):55P-56P
references: 6050117
references: Med Sci Sports. 1976 Summer;8(2):119-21
references: 957931
references: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jan;108(1):177-82
references: 19771448
references: J Biomech. 1989;22(11-12):1151-61
references: 2625415
references: Am J Sports Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;29(4):480-7
references: 11476390
references: J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Apr;15(2):186-91
references: 21419359
references: Appl Ergon. 1998 Oct;29(5):325-34
references: 9703347
references: Sports Med. 2006;36(1):7-18
references: 16445308
references: J Biomech. 1992 Jan;25(1):41-53
references: 1733983
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000 Aug;15(7):528-35
references: 10831813
references: J Biomech. 1998 Aug;31(8):677-83
references: 9796667
references: J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 May;86(5):1445-57
references: 10233103
references: J Trauma. 2006 Feb;60(2):312-8
references: 16508488
references: Phys Sportsmed. 2004 Apr;32(4):23-30
references: 20086406
references: J Biomech. 2000 Feb;33(2):155-64
references: 10653028
references: Int J Sports Med. 1988 Apr;9(2):118-22
references: 3384516
references: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010 Feb;20(1):102-7
references: 19028111
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Nov;23(11):1289-96
references: 1766346
references: J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Dec;15(12):748-56
references: 18063715
references: Clin J Sport Med. 2005 Jul;15(4):271-6
references: 16003043
references: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Dec;102(1):11-8
references: 17846783
references: J Biomech. 2005 Dec;38(12):2415-22
references: 16214489
references: Am J Sports Med. 1986 Jul-Aug;14(4):285-90
references: 3728780
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1355-9
references: 18545167
references: J Sports Sci. 1997 Aug;15(4):395-402
references: 9293416
references: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Dec;19(6):e465-71
references: 19042140
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 Jun;16(5):431-7
references: 11390051
references: J Biomech. 1986;19(9):683-94
references: 3793743
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Mar;25(3):629-33
references: 20581695
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959 Jan;41-A(1):123-31
references: 13620693
references: Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986;18(4):165-72
references: 3810083
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Dec;34(12):2079-84
references: 12471319
references: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Nov;91(5):2035-40
references: 11641341
references: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006 Dec;16(6):642-9
references: 16377214
references: J Biomech. 1990;23(5):487-94
references: 2373721
references: Med Sci Sports. 1977 Summer;9(2):113-7
references: 895427
references: Neuroscience. 1992;46(1):197-207
references: 1594103
references: Sports Med. 1991 Jan;11(1):52-70
references: 2011683
references: Clin Sports Med. 1994 Jan;13(1):187-205
references: 8111852
references: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Jun;94(6):2241-8
references: 12533502
references: Phys Ther. 1987 Sep;67(9):1365-9
references: 3628491
references: Scand J Rehabil Med. 1985;17(2):53-61
references: 4023660