title: Choosing the right medicare prescription drug plan: the effect of age, strategy selection, and choice set size.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 (better known as Medicare Part D) represents the most important change to Medicare since its inception in the mid-1960s. The large number of drug plans being offered has raised concern over the complex design of the program. The purposes of this article are to examine the effect of age and choice set size (3 vs. 9 drug plans) on decision processes, strategy selection, and decision quality within the Medicare Part D program.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred fifty individuals completed a MouselabWeb study, a computer-based program that allowed us to trace the information acquisition process, designed to simulate the official Medicare Web site.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The data reveal that participants identified the lowest cost plan only 46% of the time. As predicted, an increase in choice set size (3 vs. 9) was associated with 0.25 times the odds of correctly selecting the lowest cost plan, representing an average loss of $48.71. Older participants, likewise, tended to make poorer decisions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The study provides some indication that decision strategy mediates the association between age and choice quality and provides further insight regarding how to better design a choice environment that will improve the performance of older consumers.
authors: School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom. yaniv.hanoch@plymouth.ac.uk
authors: Yaniv
authors: Y
authors: Hanoch
authors: Stacey
authors: S
authors: Wood
authors: Andrew
authors: A
authors: Barnes
authors: Pi-Ju
authors: PJ
authors: Liu
authors: Thomas
authors: T
authors: Rice
references: Psychol Aging. 1993 Jun;8(2):231-41
references: 8323727
references: Psychol Aging. 2005 Mar;20(1):71-84
references: 15769215
references: Psychol Aging. 2007 Dec;22(4):796-810
references: 18179298
references: Milbank Q. 2006;84(1):37-73
references: 16529568
references: Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):299-309
references: 20545415
references: Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1157-68
references: 19486180
references: Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):671-5
references: 18808256
references: Health Econ. 2000 Jul;9(5):435-46
references: 10903543
references: Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):582-93
references: 20228281
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Nov;83(5):1178-97
references: 12416921
references: Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Feb;66(1):97-115
references: 18836066
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):1-23
references: 26151915
references: J Gerontol. 1990 Mar;45(2):P75-8
references: 2179392
references: Psychol Aging. 2007 Mar;22(1):134-146
references: 17385990
references: Psychol Methods. 2003 Jun;8(2):115-28
references: 12924810
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 May-Jun;20(3):199-203
references: 11585167
references: Health Econ. 1997 Nov-Dec;6(6):561-75
references: 9466139
references: Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):289-98
references: 20545414
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):995-1006
references: 11138768