title: Direct and indirect effects in the regulation of overlapping promoters.
abstract: Optimal response to environmental stimuli often requires activation of certain genes and repression of others. Dual function regulatory proteins play a key role in the differential regulation of gene expression. While repression can be achieved by any DNA binding protein through steric occlusion of RNA polymerase in the promoter region, activation often requires a surface on the regulatory protein to contact RNAP and thus facilitate transcription initiation. RNAP itself is also a DNA binding protein, therefore it can function as a transcriptional repressor. Searching the Escherichia coli promoter database we found that ∼14% of the identified 'forward' promoters overlap with a promoter oriented in the opposite direction. In this article we combine a mathematical model with experimental analysis of synthetic regulatory regions to investigate interference of overlapping promoters. We find that promoter interference depends on the characteristics of overlapping promoters. The model predicts that promoter strength and interference can be regulated separately, which provides unique opportunities for regulation. Our experimental data suggest that in principle any DNA binding protein can be used for both activation and repression of promoter transcription, depending on the context. These findings can be exploited in the construction of synthetic networks.
authors: CMOL, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark, Department of Genetics, Eotvos Lorand University, H-1117, Budapest, Hungary.
authors: Kristian Moss
authors: KM
authors: Bendtsen
authors: János
authors: J
authors: Erdossy
authors: Zsolt
authors: Z
authors: Csiszovszki
authors: Sine Lo
authors: SL
authors: Svenningsen
authors: Kim
authors: K
authors: Sneppen
authors: Sandeep
authors: S
authors: Krishna
authors: Szabolcs
authors: S
authors: Semsey
references: Trends Genet. 2005 Jun;21(6):339-45
references: 15922833
references: Mol Cell. 2006 Dec 8;24(5):747-757
references: 17157257
references: J Bacteriol. 1998 Oct;180(20):5466-72
references: 9765583
references: mBio. 2010 May 18;1(1):
references: 20689751
references: J Mol Biol. 2005 Feb 18;346(2):399-409
references: 15670592
references: J Mol Biol. 1961 Jun;3:318-56
references: 13718526
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 20;107(29):12998-3003
references: 20615961
references: Biochemistry. 2003 Apr 8;42(13):3798-811
references: 12667071
references: EMBO J. 2002 Aug 15;21(16):4349-56
references: 12169637
references: Mol Cell. 2009 Jun 12;34(5):545-55
references: 19524535
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Nov;27(11):1043-9
references: 19881496
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10655-9
references: 19541626
references: Science. 1993 May 7;260(5109):805-7
references: 8387228
references: EMBO J. 1990 Jul;9(7):2215-20
references: 2192861
references: Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jun;58(2):268-90
references: 8078436
references: EMBO J. 1995 Sep 15;14(18):4523-9
references: 7556095
references: J Biol Chem. 1993 Apr 25;268(12):8943-8
references: 8473337
references: Gene. 1998 Nov 26;223(1-2):235-45
references: 9858739