title: [Early esophageal cancer: pro surgical resection].
abstract: Endoscopic methods are increasingly propagated as oncologically adequate and less invasive treatment modalities for early esophageal cancer compared to surgery. The superiority or equality of endoscopic treatment has, however, so far not been proven by controlled trials. Current guidelines and an analysis of recently published data support surgical resection and lymphadenectomy as the standard of care for early esophageal cancer. This is based on the following arguments: 1) a reliable complete tumor resection with clear margins in all directions (R0 resection) including removal of all precancerous and precursor lesions can currently only be achieved by surgical resection, 2) none of the currently available staging tools allows definitive exclusion of lymphatic spread. A potentially curative surgical lymphadenectomy should thus only be omitted in well-defined subgroups. 3) In experienced hands surgical resection and lymphadenectomy can be performed with low mortality and morbidity, 4) reproducible and reliable data on long-term recurrence-free survival and quality of life are currently only available for surgical series. Thus, endoscopic therapy for early esophageal cancer is an alternative to surgical resection with lymphadenectomy only in patients unfit for surgery and in strictly defined low-risk situations.
authors: Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum Nürnberg, Deutschland. Hubert.Stein@klinikum-nuernberg.de
authors: H J
authors: HJ
authors: Stein
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Schweigert
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Dubecz
references: Ann Surg. 2008 Mar;247(3):434-9
references: 18376186
references: Ann Surg. 2005 Oct;242(4):566-73; discussion 573-5
references: 16192817
references: Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):665-71; discussion 671-4
references: 17893503
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(1):113-9
references: 21277216
references: Endoscopy. 2004 Sep;36(9):776-81
references: 15326572
references: J R Soc Med. 1981 Dec;74(12):884-6
references: 7321012
references: Ann Surg. 2001 Sep;234(3):360-7; discussion 368-9
references: 11524589
references: Endoscopy. 2008 Feb;40(2):169; author reply 170
references: 18253913
references: Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21 Suppl 5:v46-9
references: 20555101
references: Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):525-31
references: 20539974
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr;210(4):418-27
references: 20347733
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Nov;15(11):3278-88
references: 18726651
references: J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Dec;11(12):1589-97
references: 17909921
references: Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Mar;31(3):403-9
references: 17325482
references: Zentralbl Chir. 2006 Apr;131(2):97-104
references: 16612774
references: Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct;70(4):632-4
references: 19788980
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Aug;203(2):152-61
references: 16864027
references: J Surg Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;92(3):210-7
references: 16299789
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Apr;87(4):1048-54; discussion 1054-5
references: 19324126
references: Adv Surg. 2007;41:229-39
references: 17972568
references: Gut. 2010 Sep;59(9):1169-77
references: 20525701
references: Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jan;65(1):3-10
references: 17185072