title: A review on the clinical implementation of respiratory-gated radiation therapy.
abstract: Respiratory-gated treatment techniques have been introduced into the radiation oncology practice to manage target or organ motions. This paper will review the implementation of this type of gated treatment technique where the respiratory cycle is determined using an external marker. The external marker device is placed on the abdominal region between the xyphoid process and the umbilicus of the patient. An infrared camera tracks the motion of the marker to generate a surrogate for the respiratory cycle. The relationship, if any, between the respiratory cycle and the movement of the target can be complex. The four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scanner is used to identify this motion for those patients that meet three requirements for the successful implementation of respiratory-gated treatment technique for radiation therapy. These requirements are (a) the respiratory cycle must be periodic and maintained during treatment, (b) the movement of the target must be related to the respiratory cycle, and (c) the gating window can be set sufficiently large to minimise the overall treatment time or increase the duty cycle and yet small enough to be within the gate. If the respiratory-gated treatment technique is employed, the end-expiration image set is typically used for treatment planning purposes because this image set represents the phase of the respiratory cycle where the anatomical movement is often the least for the longest time. Contouring should account for tumour residual motion, setup uncertainty, and also allow for deviation from the expected respiratory cycle during treatment. Respiratory-gated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans must also be validated prior to treatment. Quality assurance should be performed to check for positional changes and the output in association with the motion-gated technique. To avoid potential treatment errors, radiation therapist (radiographer) should be regularly in-serviced and made aware of the need to invoke the gating feature when prescribed for selected patients.
authors: University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
authors: C B
authors: CB
authors: Saw
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Brandner
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Selvaraj
authors: H
authors: H
authors: Chen
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Saiful Huq
authors: D E
authors: DE
authors: Heron
references: Acta Oncol. 1995;34(6):861-70
references: 7576756
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 May 1;56(1):240-7
references: 12694845
references: Med Dosim. 2006 Summer;31(2):152-62
references: 16690456
references: Med Dosim. 2006 Summer;31(2):134-40
references: 16690454
references: Med Dosim. 2001 Summer;26(2):111-2
references: 11444512
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Nov 1;48(4):1175-85
references: 11072177
references: Med Dosim. 2006 Spring;31(1):1-2
references: 16551523
references: Med Dosim. 2006 Summer;31(2):113-25
references: 16690452
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jul 15;53(4):822-34
references: 12095547
references: Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jan;14(1):10-8
references: 14752729
references: Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3874-900
references: 17089851
references: Med Dosim. 2002 Summer;27(2):75-7
references: 12074471
references: Med Dosim. 2001 Spring;26(1):1
references: 11417500
references: Med Dosim. 2006 Summer;31(2):141-51
references: 16690455
references: Med Dosim. 2006 Summer;31(2):89-90
references: 16690450
references: Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1984;25(2):129-31
references: 6731017
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Dec 1;48(5):1591-7
references: 11121666
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 May 1;50(1):265-78
references: 11316572