title: A new similarity measure for spike trains: sensitivity to bursts and periods of inhibition.
abstract: An important problem in neuroscience is that of constructing quantitative measures of the similarity between neural spike trains. These measures can be used, for example, to assess the reliability of the response of a single neuron to repeated stimulus presentations, or to uncover relationships in the firing patterns of multiple neurons in a population. While several similarity measures have been proposed, the extent to which they take into account various biologically important spike train features such as bursts of spikes, or periods of inactivity remains poorly understood. Here we compare these measures using tests specifically designed to assess the sensitivity to bursts and silent periods. In addition, we propose two new measures. The first is designed to detect periods of shared silence between spike trains, while the second is designed to emphasize the presence of common bursts. To assist researchers in determining which measure is best suited to their particular data analysis needs, we also show how these measures can be combined and how their parameters can be determined on the basis of physiologically relevant quantities.
authors: Program in Applied Mathematics, The University of Arizona, PO Box 210089, Tucson, AZ 87521-0089, United States. dlyttle@math.arizona.edu
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Lyttle
authors: Jean-Marc
authors: JM
authors: Fellous
references: Neuron. 2000 Sep;27(3):635-46
references: 11055444
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Oct;66(4 Pt 1):041904
references: 12443232
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jan 30;195(1):92-106
references: 21129402
references: J Comput Neurosci. 2009 Feb;26(1):149-55
references: 18607707
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Sep 15;165(1):151-61
references: 17628690
references: Stat Med. 2007 Sep 20;26(21):3997-4008
references: 17593566
references: Front Neuroinform. 2010 Mar 05;4:2
references: 20224819
references: Trends Neurosci. 2004 Apr;27(4):225-30
references: 15046882
references: Neuroscience. 2009 Sep 1;162(3):816-26
references: 19249335
references: J Neurosci. 1998 Dec 15;18(24):10464-72
references: 9852584
references: J Neurosci. 2004 Mar 24;24(12):2989-3001
references: 15044538
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Mar 15;196(1):201-19
references: 21236298
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Oct;15(5):585-92
references: 16140522
references: J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15;22(16):6837-41
references: 12177180
references: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;80(3):1427-38
references: 9744950
references: Prog Neurobiol. 2001 Dec;65(6):545-91
references: 11728644
references: Trends Neurosci. 2007 Jul;30(7):325-33
references: 17532482
references: Trends Neurosci. 1997 Jan;20(1):38-43
references: 9004418
references: Science. 1996 Mar 29;271(5257):1870-3
references: 8596957
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Apr 30;169(2):417-24
references: 18160135
references: Neurocomputing. 2003 Jun 1;52-54:925-931
references: 20740049
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Jun;69(6 Pt 1):061905
references: 15244615
references: Network. 2003 Feb;14(1):103-18
references: 12613553
references: Neural Comput. 2001 Apr;13(4):751-63
references: 11255567