title: Separating foliar physiology from morphology reveals the relative roles of vertically structured transpiration factors within red maple crowns and limitations of larger scale models.
abstract: A spatially explicit mechanistic model, MAESTRA, was used to separate key parameters affecting transpiration to provide insights into the most influential parameters for accurate predictions of within-crown and within-canopy transpiration. Once validated among Acer rubrum L. genotypes, model responses to different parameterization scenarios were scaled up to stand transpiration (expressed per unit leaf area) to assess how transpiration might be affected by the spatial distribution of foliage properties. For example, when physiological differences were accounted for, differences in leaf width among A. rubrum L. genotypes resulted in a 25% difference in transpiration. An in silico within-canopy sensitivity analysis was conducted over the range of genotype parameter variation observed and under different climate forcing conditions. The analysis revealed that seven of 16 leaf traits had a ≥5% impact on transpiration predictions. Under sparse foliage conditions, comparisons of the present findings with previous studies were in agreement that parameters such as the maximum Rubisco-limited rate of photosynthesis can explain ∼20% of the variability in predicted transpiration. However, the spatial analysis shows how such parameters can decrease or change in importance below the uppermost canopy layer. Alternatively, model sensitivity to leaf width and minimum stomatal conductance was continuous along a vertical canopy depth profile. Foremost, transpiration sensitivity to an observed range of morphological and physiological parameters is examined and the spatial sensitivity of transpiration model predictions to vertical variations in microclimate and foliage density is identified to reduce the uncertainty of current transpiration predictions.
authors: Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1173, USA. bauerle@colostate.edu
authors: William L
authors: WL
authors: Bauerle
authors: Joseph D
authors: JD
authors: Bowden
references: Science. 2004 Aug 20;305(5687):1138-40
references: 15326351
references: Ann Bot. 2009 Sep;104(4):775-84
references: 19567419
references: Science. 1997 Jan 24;275(5299):502-9
references: 8999789
references: PLoS One. 2009 Oct 29;4(10):e7653
references: 19893620
references: J Exp Bot. 2007;58(12):3285-98
references: 17804430
references: New Phytol. 2009;183(1):13-26
references: 19413689
references: Ann Bot. 2004 Apr;93(4):435-41
references: 14980969
references: Am J Bot. 2007 Jun;94(6):926-34
references: 21636461
references: Tree Physiol. 2007 Dec;27(12):1687-99
references: 17938100
references: Tree Physiol. 2008 Apr;28(4):559-77
references: 18244943
references: Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1965;19:205-34
references: 5321565
references: New Phytol. 2008;179(3):808-817
references: 18507771
references: Tree Physiol. 2004 May;24(5):589-97
references: 14996663
references: Environ Monit Assess. 1994 Sep;32(2):135-54
references: 24214086
references: Tree Physiol. 2009 Jul;29(7):869-77
references: 19364703
references: Tree Physiol. 2003 Aug;23(12):841-50
references: 12865250
references: Am J Bot. 2005 Jul;92(7):1141-51
references: 21646136
references: Tree Physiol. 1990 Dec;7(1_2_3_4):297-316
references: 14972925
references: Tree Physiol. 2008 Nov;28(11):1675-83
references: 18765372
references: Tree Physiol. 2007 Aug;27(8):1083-92
references: 17472935
references: J Exp Bot. 2009;60(13):3665-76
references: 19561047