title: Age of inoculum strongly influences persister frequency and can mask effects of mutations implicated in altered persistence.
abstract: The majority of cells transferred from stationary-phase culture into fresh medium resume growth quickly, while a few remain in a nongrowing state for longer. These temporarily nonproliferating bacteria are tolerant of several bactericidal antibiotics and constitute a main source of persisters. Several genes have been shown to influence the frequency of persisters in Escherichia coli, although the exact mechanism underlying persister formation is unknown. This study demonstrates that the frequency of persisters is highly dependent on the age of the inoculum and the medium in which it has been grown. The hipA7 mutant had 1,000 times more persisters than the wild type when inocula were sampled from younger stationary-phase cultures. When started after a long stationary phase, the two displayed equal and elevated persister frequencies. The lower persister frequencies of glpD, dnaJ, and surA knockout strains were increased to the level of the wild type when inocula aged. The mqsR and phoU deletions showed decreased persister levels only when the inocula were from aged cultures, while sucB and ygfA deletions had decreased persister levels irrespective of the age of the inocula. A dependency on culture conditions underlines the notion that during screening for mutants with altered persister frequencies, the exact experimental details are of great importance. Unlike ampicillin and norfloxacin, which always leave a fraction of bacteria alive, amikacin killed all cells in the growth resumption experiment. It was concluded that the frequency of persisters depends on the conditions of inoculum cultivation, particularly its age, and the choice of antibiotic.
authors: Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, Tartu 50411, Estonia.
authors: Hannes
authors: H
authors: Luidalepp
authors: Arvi
authors: A
authors: Jõers
authors: Niilo
authors: N
authors: Kaldalu
authors: Tanel
authors: T
authors: Tenson
references: Nat Protoc. 2008;3(2):163-75
references: 18274517
references: J Bacteriol. 2006 Jul;188(14):5136-44
references: 16816185
references: J Clin Pharm Ther. 1989 Jun;14(3):189-95
references: 2760117
references: Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1622-5
references: 15308767
references: Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:2006.0008
references: 16738554
references: PLoS Biol. 2010 Feb 23;8(2):e1000317
references: 20186264
references: BMC Microbiol. 2008 Apr 23;8:68
references: 18430255
references: Nat Methods. 2010 Sep;7(9):737-9
references: 20676109
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 6;97(12):6640-5
references: 10829079
references: J Bacteriol. 1983 Aug;155(2):768-75
references: 6348026
references: Science. 2009 Jan 16;323(5912):396-401
references: 19150849
references: J Bacteriol. 2006 May;188(10):3494-7
references: 16672603
references: J Bacteriol. 2004 Dec;186(24):8172-80
references: 15576765
references: Mol Syst Biol. 2011 Mar 29;7:477
references: 21451587
references: J Bacteriol. 2010 Jul;192(13):3379-84
references: 20435730
references: Cell. 2007 Sep 7;130(5):797-810
references: 17803904
references: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov;82(5):595-600
references: 17898708
references: Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Jul-Aug;8 Suppl 3:S279-91
references: 3529321
references: J Bacteriol. 2007 Dec;189(23):8746-9
references: 17905994
references: J Bacteriol. 1988 Aug;170(8):3321-6
references: 3042747
references: Science. 1997 Sep 5;277(5331):1453-62
references: 9278503
references: BMC Microbiol. 2010 Jul 07;10:185
references: 20609240
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 13;107(28):12541-6
references: 20616060
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 22;105(16):6145-9
references: 18427112
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;74(8):2534-6
references: 18296533
references: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010;64:357-72
references: 20528688
references: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Apr;49(4):1483-94
references: 15793130
references: BMC Mol Biol. 2007 Oct 31;8:100
references: 17973990
references: EMBO Rep. 2003 Apr;4(4):400-4
references: 12671690
references: Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009 Jan;73(1):117-23
references: 19129642
references: Mol Microbiol. 2003 Nov;50(4):1199-213
references: 14622409
references: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010 Jan 1;391(1):209-13
references: 19909729
references: J Bacteriol. 2001 Dec;183(23):6746-51
references: 11698361
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Feb;303(1):33-40
references: 20041955
references: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Aug;52(8):2718-26
references: 18519731
references: J Bacteriol. 1958 Nov;76(5):485-90
references: 13598705
references: Plant Cell Rep. 1994 Jun;13(9):504-9
references: 24194129
references: Nature. 2009 Nov 5;462(7269):90-3
references: 19890329
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004 Jan 15;230(1):13-8
references: 14734160
references: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Jun;51(6):2092-9
references: 17420206
references: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Dec;54(12):5173-9
references: 20855735
references: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Apr;4(4):259-71
references: 16541134
references: J Bacteriol. 1974 Sep;119(3):736-47
references: 4604283
references: PLoS Genet. 2009 Dec;5(12):e1000760
references: 20011100