title: Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality following changes to tube potential (kVp) in conventional paediatric chest radiography.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  A study of radiation dose and image quality following changes to the tube potential (kVp) in paediatric chest radiography.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 109 patients ranging from 1 month to 15 years were included in two phases of the study. Phase 1 investigated the range of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) values received from patients exposed to the existing exposure factors. In the second phase, new exposure factors using recommended values of tube potential (kVp) with reduced mAs were used. ESAK values were measured using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). Image quality in both phases was evaluated using image quality criteria proposed by the Council of the European Communities (CEC). Results of both techniques were analysed for any differences.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The overall mean ESAK before the changes was 0.22 mGy (range: 0.05-0.43) Following changes in tube potential, the overall mean reduced to 0.15 mGy (range: 0.03-0.38), a significant reduction by 34%. The interquartile range was reduced from 45% to 40%. However, doses to those below a year in age still remained high. Assessment of image quality was found to have no significant differences as far as the two techniques used were concerned. However, higher image scores were achieved using higher kVps.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Significant dose reduction was achieved through appropriate changes in tube potential and reduction of mAs without any loss in image quality.
authors: Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Ramanaidu
authors: Rb
authors: R
authors: Sta Maria
authors: Kh
authors: Kh
authors: Ng
authors: J
authors: J
authors: George
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Kumar
references: Br J Radiol. 1995 Oct;68(814):1074-82
references: 7496707
references: Br J Radiol. 1996 May;69(821):437-50
references: 8705183
references: Br J Radiol. 2001 Nov;74(887):1032-40
references: 11709469
references: Br J Radiol. 1998 Aug;71(848):852-60
references: 9828798
references: Br J Radiol. 1998 Jun;71(846):654-60
references: 9849390
references: Br J Radiol. 1993 Mar;66(783):228-33
references: 8472116
references: Br J Radiol. 1995 Dec;68(816):1349-55
references: 8777597
references: Br J Radiol. 1994 Sep;67(801):864-71
references: 7953228