title: Multiple factors may influence the performance of a visual prosthesis based on intracortical microstimulation: nonhuman primate behavioural experimentation.
abstract: We hypothesize that a visual prosthesis capable of evoking high-resolution visual perceptions can be produced using high-electrode-count arrays of penetrating microelectrodes implanted into the primary visual cortex of a blind human subject. To explore this hypothesis, and as a prelude to human psychophysical experiments, we have conducted a set of experiments in primary visual cortex (V1) of non-human primates using chronically implanted Utah Electrode Arrays (UEAs). The electrical and recording properties of implanted electrodes, the high-resolution visuotopic organization of V1, and the stimulation levels required to evoke behavioural responses were measured. The impedances of stimulated electrodes were found to drop significantly immediately following stimulation sessions, but these post-stimulation impedances returned to pre-stimulation values by the next experimental session. Two months of periodic microstimulation at currents of up to 96 µA did not impair the mapping of receptive fields from local field potentials or multi-unit activity, or impact behavioural visual thresholds of light stimuli that excited regions of V1 that were implanted with UEAs. These results demonstrate that microstimulation at the levels used did not cause functional impairment of the electrode array or the neural tissue. However, microstimulation with current levels ranging from 18 to 76 µA (46 ± 19 µA, mean ± std) was able to elicit behavioural responses on eight out of 82 systematically stimulated electrodes. We suggest that the ability of microstimulation to evoke phosphenes and elicit a subsequent behavioural response may depend on several factors: the location of the electrode tips within the cortical layers of V1, distance of the electrode tips to neuronal somata, and the inability of nonhuman primates to recognize and respond to a generalized set of evoked percepts.
authors: Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, UT, USA.
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Torab
authors: T S
authors: TS
authors: Davis
authors: D J
authors: DJ
authors: Warren
authors: P A
authors: PA
authors: House
authors: R A
authors: RA
authors: Normann
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Greger
references: Brain. 2009 Nov;132(Pt 11):3047-59
references: 19745024
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 16;29(37):11540-9
references: 19759301
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006 Feb;53(2):333-40
references: 16485763
references: J Neural Eng. 2008 Dec;5(4):455-76
references: 19015583
references: Neuroscience. 2001;105(1):19-31
references: 11483297
references: J Physiol. 1968 Feb;194(2):54-5P
references: 5639368
references: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2005;2005:7660-3
references: 17282055
references: Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Aug 10;4:
references: 20802856
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):3443-50
references: 16079194
references: Nat Neurosci. 2004 May;7(5):446-51
references: 15114356
references: Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004 Aug-Sep;82(8-9):599-609
references: 15523517
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):3430-42
references: 16079195
references: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Dec;27(6):406-11
references: 21076338
references: Laryngoscope. 2007 Jun;117(6):1053-62
references: 17545868
references: Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):52-63
references: 18485635
references: Nature. 2006 Jul 13;442(7099):164-71
references: 16838014
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2000 Apr 15;97(2):93-101
references: 10788663
references: J Neurosci Methods. 1998 Jul 1;82(1):1-15
references: 10223510
references: J Comp Neurol. 1996 Feb 26;366(1):55-75
references: 8866846
references: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:4573-7
references: 19963841
references: Otol Neurotol. 2003 Sep;24(5):764-8
references: 14501454
references: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;25(6):321-30
references: 18997628
references: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;102(4):2069-83
references: 19657084
references: J Neural Eng. 2009 Aug;6(4):046001
references: 19494421
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 30;28(5):1163-78
references: 18234894
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;93(3):1659-70
references: 15342724
references: Ann Biomed Eng. 2006 Feb;34(2):300-9
references: 16496084
references: Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990 May;28(3):257-9
references: 2377008
references: Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):1098-101
references: 18509337
references: Brain. 1996 Apr;119 ( Pt 2):507-22
references: 8800945
references: J Neural Eng. 2007 Dec;4(4):410-23
references: 18057508
references: J Physiol. 1974 Dec;243(2):553-76
references: 4449074
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Jun 30;181(1):106-10
references: 19394360
references: Brain. 2010 Jun;133(Pt 6):1668-81
references: 20511283
references: Neurosurg Focus. 2006 May 15;20(5):E4
references: 16711661
references: J Neurosci. 1988 May;8(5):1531-68
references: 3367210
references: IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1999 Sep;7(3):315-26
references: 10498377
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):570-9
references: 15229215
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):1-19
references: 15371496
references: Neurosurgery. 2009 Mar;64(3):540-5; discussion 545
references: 19240617
references: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:4387-91
references: 17946626
references: Ann Biomed Eng. 1992;20(4):413-22
references: 1510293
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Jul;57(7):1774-84
references: 20403782
references: Neuron. 2009 Jan 15;61(1):35-41
references: 19146811
references: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Dec;23(6):577-84
references: 17143147
references: J Neural Eng. 2004 Dec;1(4):218-27
references: 15876642
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 21;30(29):9659-69
references: 20660249
references: J Neural Eng. 2010 Jun;7(3):036005
references: 20460692