title: The architecture of the connective tissue in the musculoskeletal system-an often overlooked functional parameter as to proprioception in the locomotor apparatus.
abstract: The architecture of the connective tissue, including structures such as fasciae, sheaths, and membranes, is more important for understanding functional meaning than is more traditional anatomy, whose anatomical dissection method neglects and denies the continuity of the connective tissue as integrating matrix of the body.The connective tissue anatomy and architecture exhibits two functional tendencies that are present in all areas of the body in different ways and relationships. In body cavities, the "disconnecting" quality of shaping space enables mobility; between organs and body parts, the "connecting" dimension enables functional mechanical interactions. In the musculoskeletal system, those two features of the connective tissue are also present. They cannot be found by the usual analytic dissection procedures. An architectural description is necessary.This article uses such a methodologic approach and gives such a description for the lateral elbow region. The result is an alternative architectural view of the anatomic substrate involved in the transmission and conveyance of forces over synovial joints. An architectural description of the muscular and connective tissue organized in series with each other to enable the transmission of forces over these dynamic entities is more appropriate than is the classical concept of "passive" force-guiding structures such as ligaments organized in parallel to actively force-transmitting structures such as muscles with tendons.The discrimination between so-called joint receptors and muscle receptors is an artificial distinction when function is considered. Mechanoreceptors, also the so-called muscle receptors, are arranged in the context of force circumstances-that is, of the architecture of muscle and connective tissue rather than of the classical anatomic structures such as muscle, capsules, and ligaments. In the lateral cubital region of the rat, a spectrum of mechanosensitive substrate occurs at the transitional areas between regular dense connective tissue layers and the muscle fascicles organized in series with them. This substrate exhibits features of type and location of the mechanosensitive nerve terminals that usually are considered characteristic for "joint receptors" as well as for "muscle receptors."The receptors for proprioception are concentrated in those areas where tensile stresses are conveyed over the elbow joint. Structures cannot be divided into either joint receptors or muscle receptors when muscular and collagenous connective tissue structures function in series to maintain joint integrity and stability. In vivo, those connective tissue structures are strained during movements of the skeletal parts, those movements in turn being induced and led by tension in muscular tissue. In principle, because of the architecture, receptors can also be stimulated by changes in muscle tension without skeletal movement, or by skeletal movement without change in muscle tension. A mutual relationship exists between structure (and function) of the mechanoreceptors and the architecture of the muscular and regular dense connective tissue. Both are instrumental in the coding of proprioceptive information to the central nervous system.
authors: University Maastricht, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Maastricht, Netherlands.
authors: Jaap
authors: J
authors: van der Wal
references: Brain Res. 1987 Nov 10;425(2):369-71
references: 3427438
references: Exp Brain Res. 1984;56(2):361-8
references: 6479269
references: J Anat. 1979 Dec;129(Pt 4):719-29
references: 536310
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Jul;55(5):1016-25
references: 4760087
references: Brain. 1972;95(4):705-48
references: 4265060
references: J Neurophysiol. 1982 Jul;48(1):49-61
references: 6214617
references: Anat Embryol (Berl). 1987;175(3):289-301
references: 3826655
references: J Orthop Res. 1984;2(2):169-76
references: 6541683
references: J Exp Biol. 1985 Mar;115:137-46
references: 3161975
references: J Physiol. 1954 Feb 26;123(2):241-50
references: 13143507
references: J Physiol. 1987 May;386:63-71
references: 3681720
references: Acta Anat (Basel). 1967;68(3):321-33
references: 5591904
references: Am J Anat. 1957 May;100(3):289-317
references: 13458113
references: Physiol Rev. 1978 Oct;58(4):763-820
references: 360251
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1982;5:189-218
references: 6462096
references: J Neurophysiol. 1975 Nov;38(6):1464-72
references: 1221083
references: Anat Rec. 1982 Oct;204(2):123-30
references: 7181128
references: Int Orthop. 1985;9(2):123-7
references: 4055174
references: Anat Embryol (Berl). 1985;172(2):145-56
references: 4051191
references: Brain Res. 1973 Jun 15;55(2):443-5
references: 4268355
references: Prog Brain Res. 1979;50:245-54
references: 162155
references: Am J Anat. 1982 May;164(1):67-77
references: 7102574
references: Anat Embryol (Berl). 1985;172(3):265-75
references: 4061868
references: J Neurophysiol. 1982 Jun;47(6):1029-42
references: 7108569
references: Anat Embryol (Berl). 1987;176(1):1-12
references: 3605642
references: J Anat. 1967 Jun;101(Pt 3):505-32
references: 6051731
references: Br J Surg. 1967 Dec;54(12):990-1001
references: 6066324
references: Am J Anat. 1957 Jul;101(1):59-73
references: 13478534