title: Microarray analysis and scale-free gene networks identify candidate regulators in drought-stressed roots of loblolly pine (P. taeda L.).
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Global transcriptional analysis of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) is challenging due to limited molecular tools. PtGen2, a 26,496 feature cDNA microarray, was fabricated and used to assess drought-induced gene expression in loblolly pine propagule roots. Statistical analysis of differential expression and weighted gene correlation network analysis were used to identify drought-responsive genes and further characterize the molecular basis of drought tolerance in loblolly pine.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Microarrays were used to interrogate root cDNA populations obtained from 12 genotype × treatment combinations (four genotypes, three watering regimes). Comparison of drought-stressed roots with roots from the control treatment identified 2445 genes displaying at least a 1.5-fold expression difference (false discovery rate = 0.01). Genes commonly associated with drought response in pine and other plant species, as well as a number of abiotic and biotic stress-related genes, were up-regulated in drought-stressed roots. Only 76 genes were identified as differentially expressed in drought-recovered roots, indicating that the transcript population can return to the pre-drought state within 48 hours. Gene correlation analysis predicts a scale-free network topology and identifies eleven co-expression modules that ranged in size from 34 to 938 members. Network topological parameters identified a number of central nodes (hubs) including those with significant homology (E-values ≤ 2 × 10-30) to 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, zeatin O-glucosyltransferase, and ABA-responsive protein. Identified hubs also include genes that have been associated previously with osmotic stress, phytohormones, enzymes that detoxify reactive oxygen species, and several genes of unknown function.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  PtGen2 was used to evaluate transcriptome responses in loblolly pine and was leveraged to identify 2445 differentially expressed genes responding to severe drought stress in roots. Many of the genes identified are known to be up-regulated in response to osmotic stress in pine and other plant species and encode proteins involved in both signal transduction and stress tolerance. Gene expression levels returned to control values within a 48-hour recovery period in all but 76 transcripts. Correlation network analysis indicates a scale-free network topology for the pine root transcriptome and identifies central nodes that may serve as drivers of drought-responsive transcriptome dynamics in the roots of loblolly pine.
authors: Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
authors: W Walter
authors: WW
authors: Lorenz
authors: Rob
authors: R
authors: Alba
authors: Yuan-Sheng
authors: YS
authors: Yu
authors: John M
authors: JM
authors: Bordeaux
authors: Marta
authors: M
authors: Simões
authors: Jeffrey F D
authors: JF
authors: Dean
references: J Exp Bot. 2002 Jan;53(366):33-7
references: 11741038
references: Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12
references: 10521342
references: Plant Physiol. 1994 Feb;104(2):761-767
references: 12232124
references: Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Mar;30(3):239-264
references: 32689007
references: Bioinformatics. 2001 Jun;17(6):520-5
references: 11395428
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2007 Aug;26(8):1383-90
references: 17333017
references: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2010 Mar;12(2):341-54
references: 20398240
references: Tree Physiol. 2008 Jul;28(7):1099-110
references: 18450574
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Sep;11(9):434-9
references: 16890475
references: Plant Physiol. 1987 Jan;83(1):185-9
references: 16665199
references: Biochem J. 2004 Oct 15;383(Pt 2):277-83
references: 15225123
references: Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 15;24(2):282-4
references: 18006545
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2005 Jul;58(5):699-720
references: 16158244
references: Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2
references: 9623998
references: J Exp Bot. 2004 Oct;55(406):2213-8
references: 15361537
references: Plant Mol Biol. 1989 May;12(5):475-86
references: 24271064
references: Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Apr;33(4):648-54
references: 20002333
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Feb;60(3):389-404
references: 16514562
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2008 Apr;27(4):795-803
references: 18183400
references: Plant J. 2002 Aug;31(3):279-92
references: 12164808
references: J Exp Bot. 2007;58(2):221-7
references: 17075077
references: Tree Physiol. 2002 Apr;22(5):301-10
references: 11960754
references: Plant Physiol. 2003 Dec;133(4):1702-16
references: 14681533
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Oct;7(5):491-8
references: 15337090
references: Planta. 2007 Aug;226(3):671-81
references: 17447082
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Mar;54(5):713-25
references: 15356390
references: J Vis Exp. 2009 Mar 20;(25):
references: 19305380
references: J Plant Physiol. 2008 Jun 16;165(9):932-41
references: 17928100
references: Plant Physiol. 2005 Jan;137(1):209-19
references: 15618419
references: Nat Protoc. 2007;2(10):2366-82
references: 17947979
references: Ann Bot. 2006 Dec;98(6):1301-10
references: 17028296
references: Mol Genet Genomics. 2004 Nov;272(4):433-42
references: 15480789
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Oct 21;10:346
references: 19845953
references: J Exp Bot. 2003 Jan;54(382):513-24
references: 12508062
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Feb;5(2):101-13
references: 14735121
references: Planta. 2003 Nov;218(1):1-14
references: 14513379
references: Plant J. 2004 Sep;39(5):697-714
references: 15315633
references: Biochem J. 1987 Feb 15;242(1):1-10
references: 2954537
references: J Plant Physiol. 2009 Jan 30;166(2):136-45
references: 18455260
references: Plant Physiol. 2009 Jan;149(1):575-84
references: 19011001
references: Plant Physiol. 2009 Sep;151(1):16-33
references: 19605550
references: J Exp Bot. 2008;59(15):4183-94
references: 19008411
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Oct;5(5):430-6
references: 12183182
references: Plant Cell. 2005 Nov;17(11):2954-65
references: 16243903
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Jan;51(2):249-62
references: 12602883
references: Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 Aug;46(8):1366-76
references: 15951568
references: Plant J. 2001 Aug;27(4):325-33
references: 11532178
references: Plant Cell. 2003 Feb;15(2):439-47
references: 12566583
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(5-6):551-73
references: 11999834
references: Plant Physiol. 2002 Dec;130(4):2129-41
references: 12481097
references: Plant Cell Physiol. 2001 Jul;42(7):686-93
references: 11479374
references: Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Mar;31(3):325-40
references: 18088330
references: Planta. 2000 Nov;211(6):874-82
references: 11144273
references: Plant Physiol. 2008 Jul;147(3):1251-63
references: 18502973
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2000 May;5(5):199-206
references: 10785665
references: Plant J. 2006 Nov;48(3):321-41
references: 17005011
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999 Jun;2(3):198-206
references: 10375568
references: Planta. 2009 Nov;230(6):1155-66
references: 19760263
references: Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Mar;31(3):341-53
references: 18088334
references: Physiol Plant. 2008 Jul;133(3):544-56
references: 18435695
references: Bioinformatics. 2003 Jul 22;19(11):1341-7
references: 12874045
references: Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):1099-1111
references: 12242400
references: Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 14;12(1):148
references: 31320909
references: Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6
references: 16081474
references: Tree Physiol. 2006 Sep;26(9):1185-96
references: 16740494
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Feb;10(2):88-94
references: 15708346
references: J Exp Bot. 2000 Sep;51(350):1563-74
references: 11006307
references: Comp Funct Genomics. 2002;3(3):226-43
references: 18628855
references: Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2005;4:Article17
references: 16646834
references: Plant Physiol. 2007 Feb;143(2):876-92
references: 17158588
references: Plant J. 2009 Nov;60(4):703-15
references: 19682285
references: Science. 1993 Nov 12;262(5136):1051-4
references: 8235622
references: Cancer Inform. 2007 Feb 04;3:11-7
references: 19455231
references: Mol Plant. 2008 Mar;1(2):198-217
references: 19825533
references: Plant J. 2002 Feb;29(4):417-26
references: 11846875
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 29;9:559
references: 19114008
references: Funct Integr Genomics. 2007 Apr;7(2):111-34
references: 17136344
references: Plant J. 2003 Jun;34(6):868-87
references: 12795706
references: Plant J. 2010 Aug;63(3):417-29
references: 20487379
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 May 15;30(10):e48
references: 12000853
references: J Comput Biol. 2001;8(6):557-69
references: 11747612
references: Trends Genet. 2006 Feb;22(2):101-9
references: 16380191
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2005 Oct;59(3):469-84
references: 16235111
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2007 Dec;26(12):2137-47
references: 17668218
references: Tree Physiol. 2006 Jan;26(1):1-16
references: 16203709
references: Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 May;49(5):801-13
references: 18385163
references: J Vis Exp. 2010 Feb 22;(36):
references: 20177393
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jun;13(6):281-7
references: 18467158
references: Tree Physiol. 2003 Feb;23(3):169-79
references: 12566267
references: BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Apr 03;8:32
references: 18387193
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2009 Jan;28(1):21-30
references: 18818929
references: Plant Physiol. 2004 Oct;136(2):3148-58
references: 15466240
references: Plant Physiol. 2003 Dec;133(4):1755-67
references: 14645724
references: Plant Biotechnol J. 2008 Jun;6(5):486-503
references: 18384508
references: Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010 Apr;48(4):256-64
references: 20171112
references: BMC Plant Biol. 2009 Sep 22;9:120
references: 19772648
references: Biometrics. 2003 Dec;59(4):822-8
references: 14969460
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2007 Oct;94(10):791-812
references: 17479232
references: Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Jun;49(6):865-79
references: 18413358
references: Genome. 2008 May;51(5):357-67
references: 18438439