title: Folding of small proteins using constrained molecular dynamics.
abstract: The focus of this paper is to examine whether conformational search using constrained molecular dynamics (MD) method is more enhanced and enriched toward "native-like" structures compared to all-atom MD for the protein folding as a model problem. Constrained MD methods provide an alternate MD tool for protein structure prediction and structure refinement. It is computationally expensive to perform all-atom simulations of protein folding because the processes occur on a time scale of microseconds. Compared to the all-atom MD simulation, constrained MD methods have the advantage that stable dynamics can be achieved for larger time steps and the number of degrees of freedom is an order of magnitude smaller, leading to a decrease in computational cost. We have developed a generalized constrained MD method that allows the user to "freeze and thaw" torsional degrees of freedom as fit for the problem studied. We have used this method to perform all-torsion constrained MD in implicit solvent coupled with the replica exchange method to study folding of small proteins with various secondary structural motifs such as, α-helix (polyalanine, WALP16), β-turn (1E0Q), and a mixed motif protein (Trp-cage). We demonstrate that constrained MD replica exchange method exhibits a wider conformational search than all-atom MD with increased enrichment of near-native structures. "Hierarchical" constrained MD simulations, where the partially formed helical regions in the initial stretch of the all-torsion folding simulation trajectory of Trp-cage were frozen, showed a better sampling of near-native structures than all-torsion constrained MD simulations. This is in agreement with the zipping-and-assembly folding model put forth by Dill and co-workers for folding proteins. The use of hierarchical "freeze and thaw" clustering schemes in constrained MD simulation can be used to sample conformations that contribute significantly to folding of proteins.
authors: Division of Immunology, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
authors: Gouthaman S
authors: GS
authors: Balaraman
authors: In-Hee
authors: IH
authors: Park
authors: Abhinandan
authors: A
authors: Jain
authors: Nagarajan
authors: N
authors: Vaidehi
references: Nat Struct Biol. 2002 Jun;9(6):425-30
references: 11979279
references: J Am Chem Soc. 2002 May 8;124(18):4976-7
references: 11982359
references: J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Feb 18;126(6):1849-57
references: 14871118
references: J Magn Reson. 2001 Oct;152(2):288-302
references: 11567582
references: J Comput Chem. 2005 Nov 30;26(15):1565-78
references: 16145655
references: Protein Sci. 2000 Nov;9(11):2142-50
references: 11152124
references: J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Dec 3;125(48):14841-6
references: 14640661
references: Science. 2010 Oct 15;330(6002):341-6
references: 20947758
references: J Mol Graph Model. 2010 Sep;29(2):116-25
references: 20675161
references: Proteins. 1998 Nov 15;33(3):343-57
references: 9829694
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 17;104(29):11987-92
references: 17620603
references: J Am Chem Soc. 2002 Sep 25;124(38):11258-9
references: 12236726
references: Proteins. 2004 May 1;55(2):383-94
references: 15048829
references: J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989 Feb;6(4):815-32
references: 2619942
references: Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Nov;2(11):999-1006
references: 7583674
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 23;101(12):4077-82
references: 15020773
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 11;100(23):13280-5
references: 14581616
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):7587-92
references: 12808142
references: Phys Rev Lett. 1986 Nov 24;57(21):2607-2609
references: 10033814
references: Proteins. 2009 Aug 1;76(2):448-60
references: 19173315