title: The linear excisional wound: an improved model for human ex vivo wound epithelialization studies.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Wound healing is a complex process that involves multiple intercellular and intracellular processes and extracellular interactions. Explanted human skin has been used as a model for the re-epithelialization phase of human wound healing. The currently used standard technique uses a circular punch biopsy tool to make the initial wound. Despite its wide use, the geometry of round wounds makes it difficult to measure them reliably.
  
  
  METHODS
  Our group has designed a linear wounding tool, and compared the variability in ex vivo human linear and circular wounds.
  
  
  RESULTS
  An F test for differences in variances demonstrated that the linear wounds provided a population of wound size measurements that was 50% less variable than that obtained from a group of matched circular wounds. This reduction in variability would provide substantial advantages for the linear wound technique over the circular wound punch technique, by reducing the sample sizes required for comparative studies of factors that alter healing.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This linear wounding tool thus provides a method for wounding that is standardized, provides minimal error in wound gap measurements, and is easily reproducible. We demonstrate its utility in an ex vivo model for the controlled investigation of human skin wounds.
authors: Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
authors: Amilcar Ezequiel
authors: AE
authors: Rizzo
authors: Laurel A
authors: LA
authors: Beckett
authors: Brian S
authors: BS
authors: Baier
authors: R Rivkah
authors: RR
authors: Isseroff
references: J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Mar;120(3):379-89
references: 12603850
references: J Cell Biol. 1968 Oct;39(1):135-51
references: 5678445
references: J Cell Sci. 2009 Sep 15;122(Pt 18):3209-13
references: 19726630
references: N Engl J Med. 1999 Sep 2;341(10):738-46
references: 10471461
references: Burns. 1997 Feb;23(1):32-6
references: 9115607
references: J Biol Chem. 2006 Jul 28;281(30):21225-21235
references: 16714291
references: Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1994 Jun;28(2):107-12
references: 7521538
references: Can J Vet Res. 1988 Jan;52(1):120-8
references: 3349390
references: J Invest Dermatol. 1994 Jun;102(6):38S-41S
references: 8006433
references: Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1979 Apr;160(4):458-62
references: 450911
references: Can J Vet Res. 1988 Jan;52(1):111-9
references: 3349388
references: J Surg Res. 1971 Jun;11(6):277-83
references: 5562070
references: Br J Plast Surg. 1993 Oct;46(7):585-9
references: 8252267
references: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Mar;46(3):381-6
references: 11862173
references: Microsc Res Tech. 1998 Sep 1;42(5):345-50
references: 9766429
references: J Vasc Surg. 1996 Mar;23(3):524-8
references: 8601898
references: Br J Surg. 1992 Oct;79(10):1032-4
references: 1422713
references: J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Aug;121(2):219-30
references: 12880412
references: Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):75-81
references: 9082989
references: J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(2):107-16
references: 17591222
references: Dermatology. 1992;184(2):103-10
references: 1498371