title: Comparison of manual and automatic sampling for monitoring ochratoxin A in barley grain.
abstract: Automatic and manual sampling for ochratoxin A (OTA) in barley grain was compared under industrial conditions considering sampling uncertainty as well as practical and technical aspects. Ten tonnes of barley inoculated with Penicillium verrucosum were incubated until the OTA concentration reached approximately 15 µg kg(-1) and sampled with manual and automatic sampling. A nested experimental design and ANOVA was used to estimate variance components from sampling, sample reduction, sample preparation and analysis. Manual sampling resulted in a high sampling uncertainty and OTA concentrations in aggregate samples ranged from 2 to 80 µg kg(-1). When aggregate samples were formed by automatic sampling the uncertainty arising from nugget effects and spatial distribution was practically eliminated. Results from this study show that an automatic sampler mounted after a mixer or conveyer can provide representative samples of OTA from a moving stream of barley. Automatic sampling might present a practical and economical alternative to manual sampling for feed mill operators when monitoring low levels of mycotoxins in grain or other commodities. Despite careful precautions, sample preparation and analysis resulted in a relative uncertainty of ±40% (p = 0.95), which was attributed to the sub-sampling following the two grinding steps. Size fractionation of the coarsely ground barley showed that 40% of the total amount of OTA was present in a small fraction of fine particles with a strong tendency to aggregate or stick to equipment and containers. Thus, in order to take advantage of the automatic sampling, it is crucial to apply an appropriate sub-sampling to prevent segregation of particles which may affect the OTA measurements.
authors: National Veterinary Institute, Travvägen 20, SE-751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
authors: M G
authors: MG
authors: Andersson
authors: E V
authors: EV
authors: Reiter
authors: P-A
authors: PA
authors: Lindqvist
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Razzazi-Fazeli
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Häggblom
references: Food Addit Contam. 1996;13 Suppl:53-7
references: 8972354
references: Mycotoxin Res. 2008 Jun;24(2):98-104
references: 23604686
references: J Food Prot. 1979 Jun;42(6):485-490
references: 30812257
references: Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007 Jan;51(1):61-99
references: 17195275
references: Mycotoxin Res. 2001 Jun;17 Suppl 2:193-7
references: 23605870
references: Food Addit Contam. 2003 Dec;20(12):1153-63
references: 14726279
references: Food Addit Contam. 2005;22 Suppl 1:17-25
references: 16332617
references: J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95(5):1117-23
references: 14633041
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1973 Mar;97(3):160-6
references: 4692991
references: J AOAC Int. 2000 Sep-Oct;83(5):1264-9
references: 11048871
references: Toxins (Basel). 2010 May;2(5):1065-77
references: 22069626