title: Legacy effects overwhelm the short-term effects of exotic plant invasion and restoration on soil microbial community structure, enzyme activities, and nitrogen cycling.
abstract: Plant invasions can have substantial consequences for the soil ecosystem, altering microbial community structure and nutrient cycling. However, relatively little is known about what drives these changes, making it difficult to predict the effects of future invasions. In addition, because most studies compare soils from uninvaded areas to long-established dense invasions, little is known about the temporal dependence of invasion impacts. We experimentally manipulated forest understory vegetation in replicated sites dominated either by exotic Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii), native Viburnums, or native Vacciniums, so that each vegetation type was present in each site-type. We compared the short-term effect of vegetation changes to the lingering legacy effects of the previous vegetation type by measuring soil microbial community structure (phospholipid fatty acids) and function (extracellular enzymes and nitrogen mineralization). We also replaced the aboveground litter in half of each plot with an inert substitute to determine if changes in the soil microbial community were driven by aboveground or belowground plant inputs. We found that after 2 years, the microbial community structure and function was largely determined by the legacy effect of the previous vegetation type, and was not affected by the current vegetation. Aboveground litter removal had only weak effects, suggesting that changes in the soil microbial community and nutrient cycling were driven largely by belowground processes. These results suggest that changes in the soil following either invasion or restoration do not occur quickly, but rather exhibit long-lasting legacy effects from previous belowground plant inputs.
authors: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. elgersma@umich.edu
authors: Kenneth J
authors: KJ
authors: Elgersma
authors: Joan G
authors: JG
authors: Ehrenfeld
authors: Shen
authors: S
authors: Yu
authors: Torsten
authors: T
authors: Vor
references: Ecol Lett. 2007 Aug;10(8):729-36
references: 17594428
references: Ecol Appl. 2009 Mar;19(2):376-86
references: 19323196
references: Ecology. 2007 Apr;88(4):978-88
references: 17536713
references: Oecologia. 2006 Jul;148(4):650-9
references: 16547734
references: Nature. 2001 Jun 14;411(6839):789-92
references: 11459055
references: Oecologia. 2007 Nov;154(2):327-38
references: 17657512
references: Oecologia. 2010 Feb;162(2):505-13
references: 19882174
references: Ecol Appl. 2009 Apr;19(3):553-70
references: 19425416
references: Ecol Appl. 2009 Mar;19(2):398-412
references: 19323198
references: New Phytol. 2006;169(1):27-34
references: 16390416
references: Oecologia. 2004 May;139(4):551-9
references: 15042460
references: Ecology. 2007 Dec;88(12):3115-25
references: 18229845
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 17;103(3):626-31
references: 16407148
references: Oecologia. 2008 Jun;156(3):589-600
references: 18327617
references: Oecologia. 1979 Jan;40(1):51-62
references: 28309603
references: Ecol Lett. 2008 Nov;11(11):1252-1264
references: 18823393
references: Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(1):1-14
references: 19412705
references: Ecology. 2009 Feb;90(2):441-51
references: 19323228
references: Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1430-9
references: 17601136