title: Laboratory selection for an accelerated mosquito sexual development rate.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Separating males and females at the early adult stage did not ensure the virginity of females of Anopheles arabiensis (Dongola laboratory strain), whereas two years earlier this method had been successful. In most mosquito species, newly emerged males and females are not able to mate successfully. For anopheline species, a period of 24 h post-emergence is generally required for the completion of sexual maturation, which in males includes a 180° rotation of the genitalia. In this study, the possibility of an unusually shortened sexual maturity period in the laboratory-reared colony was investigated.
  
  
  METHODS
  The effect of two different sex-separation methods on the virginity of females was tested: females separated as pupae or less than 16 h post-emergence were mated with males subjected to various doses of radiation. T-tests were performed to compare the two sex-separation methods. The rate of genitalia rotation was compared for laboratory-reared and wild males collected as pupae in Dongola, Sudan, and analysed by Z-tests. Spermatheca dissections were performed on females mated with laboratory-reared males to determine their insemination status.
  
  
  RESULTS
  When the sex-separation was performed when adults were less than 16 h post-emergence, expected sterility was never reached for females mated with radio-sterilized males. Expected sterility was accomplished only when sexes were separated at the pupal stage. Observation of genitalia rotation showed that some males from the laboratory strain Dongola were able to successfully mate only 11 h after emergence and 42% of the males had already completed rotation. A small proportion of the same age females were inseminated. Wild males showed a much slower genitalia rotation rate. At 17 h post-emergence, 96% of the laboratory-reared males had completed genitalia rotation whereas none of the wild males had.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This colony has been cultured in the laboratory for over one hundred generations, and now has accelerated sexual maturation when compared with the wild strain. This outcome demonstrates the kinds of selection that can be expected during insect colonization and maintenance, particularly when generations are non-overlapping and similar-age males must compete for mates.
authors: Insect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency Laboratories, A-2444 Seibersdorf, Austria. C.Oliva@iaea.org
authors: Clelia F
authors: CF
authors: Oliva
authors: Mark Q
authors: MQ
authors: Benedict
authors: Guy
authors: G
authors: Lempérière
authors: Jérémie
authors: J
authors: Gilles
references: J Insect Physiol. 2006 Jul;52(7):679-84
references: 16647081
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2004 May 06;4:12
references: 15132759
references: J Insect Physiol. 2004 Dec;50(12):1163-70
references: 15670863
references: Malar J. 2009 Nov 16;8 Suppl 2:S1
references: 19917070
references: Malar J. 2008 Oct 21;7:214
references: 18939985
references: Science. 1976 Aug 6;193(4252):491-3
references: 941019
references: Malar J. 2009 Nov 16;8 Suppl 2:S8
references: 19917078
references: J Insect Physiol. 2009 Mar;55(3):197-204
references: 19041323
references: Malar J. 2009 Nov 16;8 Suppl 2:S4
references: 19917074
references: J Med Entomol. 2008 Jul;45(4):698-705
references: 18714870
references: Malar J. 2006 May 15;5:41
references: 16700906
references: Malar J. 2007 Jul 30;6:99
references: 17663767
references: Bull Entomol Res. 2009 Jun;99(3):317-22
references: 19063756
references: PLoS Biol. 2009 Dec;7(12):e1000272
references: 20027206
references: Malar J. 2005 Sep 30;4:49
references: 16197541
references: Anim Behav. 1970 May;18(2):358-61
references: 5455976
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 9;104(41):16215-20
references: 17901209
references: J Med Entomol. 1982 Oct 14;19(5):573-88
references: 7143380
references: Biol Bull. 1976 Oct;151(2):283-96
references: 974162
references: Bull World Health Organ. 1967;36(1):163-7
references: 5298669