title: Use of ultrasound measurements to direct laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in infants.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is associated with an increased risk of incomplete myotomy compared with open myotomy. We hypothesized that utilizing ultrasound measured length to direct laparoscopic pyloromyotomy would reduce the risk of incomplete pyloromyotomy without a concomitant increase in the risk of mucosal perforation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Infants (n=43) with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis diagnosed by ultrasound and subsequent laparoscopic pyloromyotomy over a 2-year period (December 2006 through December 2008) were studied. Pyloromyotomy length was guided by preoperative ultrasound measurements. Pyloromyotomy was considered complete if the measured length was ≥ the ultrasound measurement. Infants were followed prospectively for time to full feeding, time to discharge, and complications.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The cohort included 38 male and 5 female infants (age, 37±13 days; range, 17 to 72 days) who underwent ultrasound (length 1.9±0.2cm; thickness 4.4±0.9mm) and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Infants achieved full feeding 28±16 hours postoperatively and were discharged 34±18 hours postoperatively. No infant required reoperation for incomplete myotomy. One infant sustained mucosal perforation (2%). No patient suffered other complications.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Preoperative ultrasound measurement of pyloric length to determine the length of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, rather than visual cues alone, appears to minimize the risk of incomplete pyloromyotomy.
authors: Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Peyton Manning Children's Hospital at St. Vincent, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. Denis.Bensard@DHHA.org
authors: Denis D
authors: DD
authors: Bensard
authors: Richard J
authors: RJ
authors: Hendrickson
authors: Kathy S
authors: KS
authors: Clark
authors: Katie J
authors: KJ
authors: Giesting
authors: Evan R
authors: ER
authors: Kokoska
references: J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Mar;39(3):292-6; discussion 292-6
references: 15017540
references: J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Dec;42(12):2026-9
references: 18082701
references: JSLS. 2005 Oct-Dec;9(4):386-8
references: 16381350
references: Lancet. 2009 Jan 31;373(9661):390-8
references: 19155060
references: Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Dec;12(6):379-82
references: 12548489
references: Radiology. 1994 Dec;193(3):771-6
references: 7972822
references: J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Apr;42(4):692-8
references: 17448768
references: Australas Radiol. 2007 Dec;51(6):560-3
references: 17958692
references: Surgery. 2004 Oct;136(4):827-32
references: 15467668
references: Ann Surg. 2004 Nov;240(5):774-8
references: 15492557
references: Arch Surg. 2005 Dec;140(12):1191-7
references: 16365241
references: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005 Oct;15(5):474-7
references: 16185119
references: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Feb;18(1):152-6
references: 18266596
references: J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Oct;41(10):1676-8
references: 17011267
references: J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jun;40(6):967-72; discussion 972-3
references: 15991179
references: Ann Surg. 2006 Sep;244(3):363-70
references: 16926562