title: Conventional Linear versus Purse-string Skin Closure after Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Comparison of Wound Infection Rates and Operative Outcomes.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Wound infection after an ileostomy reversal is a common problem. To reduce wound-related complications, purse-string skin closure was introduced as an alternative to conventional linear skin closure. This study is designed to compare wound infection rates and operative outcomes between linear and purse-string skin closure after a loop ileostomy reversal.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between December 2002 and October 2010, a total of 48 consecutive patients undergoing a loop ileostomy reversal were enrolled. Outcomes were compared between linear skin closure (group L, n = 30) and purse string closure (group P, n = 18). The operative technique for linear skin closure consisted of an elliptical incision around the stoma, with mobilization, and anastomosis of the ileum. The rectus fascia was repaired with interrupted sutures. Skin closure was performed with vertical mattress interrupted sutures. Purse-string skin closure consisted of a circumstomal incision around the ileostomy using the same procedures as used for the ileum. Fascial closure was identical to linear closure, but the circumstomal skin incision was approximated using a purse-string subcuticular suture (2-0 Polysorb).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Between group L and P, there were no differences of age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores. Original indication for ileostomy was 23 cases of malignancy (76.7%) in group L, and 13 cases of malignancy (77.2%) in group P. The median time duration from ileostomy to reversal was 4.0 months (range, 0.6 to 55.7 months) in group L and 4.1 months (range, 2.2 to 43.9 months) in group P. The median operative time was 103 minutes (range, 45 to 260 minutes) in group L and 100 minutes (range, 30 to 185 minutes) in group P. The median hospital stay was 11 days (range, 5 to 4 days) in group L and 7 days (range, 4 to 14 days) in group P (P < 0.001). Wound infection was found in 5 cases (16.7%) in group L and in one case (5.6%) in group L (P = 0.26).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Based on this study, purse-string skin closure after a loop ileostomy reversal showed comparable outcomes, in terms of wound infection rates, to those of linear skin closure. Thus, purse-string skin closure could be a good alternative to the conventional linear closure.
authors: Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
authors: Jung Ryeol
authors: JR
authors: Lee
authors: Young Wan
authors: YW
authors: Kim
authors: Jong Je
authors: JJ
authors: Sung
authors: Ok-Pyung
authors: OP
authors: Song
authors: Hyung Chul
authors: HC
authors: Kim
authors: Cheol-Wan
authors: CW
authors: Lim
authors: Gyu-Seok
authors: GS
authors: Cho
authors: Jun Chul
authors: JC
authors: Jung
authors: Eung-Jin
authors: EJ
authors: Shin
references: Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jul;171(1):17-21
references: 2360144
references: Dig Surg. 2004;21(5-6):440-6
references: 15665539
references: World J Surg. 2010 Aug;34(8):1937-42
references: 20372898
references: Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jun;10(5):460-4
references: 17953706
references: Ann Surg. 2007 Aug;246(2):207-14
references: 17667498
references: Am J Surg. 2000 Feb;179(2):92-6
references: 10773140
references: Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jun;24(6):711-23
references: 19221766
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Nov;201(5):759-73
references: 16256921
references: Br J Surg. 2010 Oct;97(10):1511-7
references: 20575111
references: Can J Surg. 1995 Apr;38(2):144-8
references: 7728668
references: Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;24(5):479-88
references: 19219439
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Aug;40(8):993-4
references: 9269819
references: ANZ J Surg. 2002 Oct;72(10):766-7
references: 12534395
references: World J Surg. 2001 Mar;25(3):274-7; discussion 277-8
references: 11343175
references: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;20(4):250-78; quiz 279-80
references: 10219875
references: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;13(10):606-8
references: 1334988
references: J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Aug;185(2):105-13
references: 9249076
references: Br J Surg. 2001 Mar;88(3):360-3
references: 11260099