title: Posttransplant pacemaker placement: case series and review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Sinus node dysfunction (SND) following orthotopic heart transplantation may lead to bradycardia, atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome, syncope, and death, with 6%-23% of patients requiring pacemakers.
  
  
  METHODS
  Permanent pacemakers were placed in 5% of orthotopic heart transplants conducted at our institution from January 2002 to October 2008.
  
  
  RESULTS
  THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT TECHNIQUES WERE USED OVER THIS TIME: (1) dual-chamber pacing in the donor atrium and ventricle (A(D)-V(D)) (62.5%); (2) single lead in the donor atrium (A(D)) (12.5%); and (3) dual leads placed in both donor and recipient atrium (A(R)-A(D)) (25%). Using the percentage of paced histograms recorded in the device, heart rate variability for the types of lead placements were 14% for A(D)-V(D), 35% for A(D), and 97% for A(R)-A(D).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The transplanted heart is characterized physiologically by autonomic denervation and chronotropic incompetence. Restoration of chronotropic competence by atrial pacing increases exercise duration and peak VO(2). Rate responsiveness can be achieved in this patient population with the placement of one lead in the remnant right atrium and one lead in the transplanted donor right atrium.
authors: Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.
authors: Mark A
authors: MA
authors: Thompson
authors: Hamang
authors: H
authors: Patel
references: Circ Res. 1973 Feb;32(2):268-78
references: 4568360
references: Circulation. 1990 Nov;82(5 Suppl):IV313-7
references: 2225423
references: Surg Forum. 1960;11:18-9
references: 13763847
references: Circulation. 1990 Mar;81(3):821-8
references: 2306833
references: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Oct;14(10):1444-7
references: 1721123
references: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Oct;22(10):1510-27
references: 10588154
references: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Oct;20(10 Pt 1):2398-404
references: 9358479
references: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Sep;25(9):1142-7
references: 16962478
references: Eur Heart J. 1997 Nov;18(11):1823-8
references: 9402458
references: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Mar;19(3):325-30
references: 8657593
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jun;25(7):1673-80
references: 7759722
references: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987 Mar;10(2):326-32
references: 2437538
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Nov 1;24(5):1334-41
references: 7930258
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Oct;68(4):1242-6
references: 10543486
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Mar;3(3):712-23
references: 6363487
references: Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jun 1;81(11):1373-7
references: 9631982
references: J Heart Transplant. 1988 Sep-Oct;7(5):380-4
references: 3058908
references: Am J Cardiol. 1995 Dec 15;76(17):1292-6
references: 7503012
references: Am Heart J. 1984 Jan;107(1):1-7
references: 6362380
references: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Oct;11(10):1402-4
references: 2462215
references: Circulation. 1989 Feb;79(2):344-9
references: 2536597
references: J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992 Jul-Aug;11(4 Pt 1):799-802
references: 1498147
references: Am J Cardiol. 1975 Dec;36(7):859-66
references: 1106169
references: Circulation. 1997 Jul 1;96(1):232-7
references: 9236439
references: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Nov;14(11 Pt 2):1792-6
references: 1721177