title: Defining socially-based spatial boundaries in the region of Peel, Ontario, Canada.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The purpose of the project was to delineate a series of contiguous neighbourhood-based "Data Zones" within the Region of Peel (Ontario) for the purpose of health data analysis and dissemination. Zones were to be built on Census Tracts (N = 205) and obey a series of requirements defined by the Region of Peel. This paper explores a method that combines statistical analysis with ground-truthing, consultation, and the use of a decision tree.
  
  
  METHODS
  Census Tract data for Peel were derived from the 2006 Canadian Census Master file.
  
  
  METHODS
  Following correlation analysis to reduce the data set, Principal Component Analysis was applied to the data set to reduce the complexity and derive an index. The Getis-Ord Gi*statistic was then applied to look for statistically significant clusters of like Census Tracts. A detailed decision tree for the amalgamation of remaining zones and ground-truthing with Peel staff verified the resulting zones.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 15 Data Zones that are similar with respect to socioeconomic and sociodemographic attributes and that met criteria defined by Peel were derived for the region.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The approach used in this analysis, which was bolstered by a series of checks and balances throughout the process, gives statistical validity to the defined zones and resulted in a robust series of Data Zones for use by Peel Public Health. We conclude by offering insight into alternative uses of the methodology, and limitations.
authors: School of Geography & Earth Sciences, McMaster University, West, Hamilton ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
authors: Adam
authors: A
authors: Drackley
authors: K Bruce
authors: KB
authors: Newbold
authors: Christian
authors: C
authors: Taylor
references: Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1783-9
references: 11684601
references: Can J Public Health. 2008 Nov-Dec;99(6):505-10
references: 19149396
references: Health Bull (Edinb). 2000 Jul;58(4):336-9
references: 12813815
references: Can J Public Health. 2006 Sep-Oct;97 Suppl 3:S11-5, S12-7
references: 17357542
references: J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Aug;12(8):472-7
references: 9276652
references: Ethn Health. 2009 Jun;14(3):315-36
references: 19263262
references: Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(3):545-65
references: 19771955
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):111-22
references: 11154250
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Sep;56(9):671-81
references: 12177083
references: Can J Public Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;98(6):470-5
references: 19039885
references: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1241-55
references: 18177988
references: Can J Public Health. 1999 Nov-Dec;90 Suppl 1:S31-4
references: 10686757
references: Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(12):1347-63
references: 2126895
references: Health Bull (Edinb). 1996 Nov;54(6):443-6
references: 8990608
references: Acad Med. 2004 Dec;79(12):1139-47
references: 15563647
references: Int J Health Geogr. 2007 Jul 05;6:27
references: 17615065
references: Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jan;54(1):65-77
references: 11820682
references: Soc Sci Med. 2004 Oct;59(7):1485-94
references: 15246176
references: Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(1):123-33
references: 10817475
references: Can J Public Health. 2005 Sep-Oct;96(5):380-4
references: 16238159
references: Health Place. 2011 Jan;17(1):289-99
references: 21168356
references: Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):733-8
references: 11988437
references: J Health Econ. 2005 Nov;24(6):1076-107
references: 16139910