title: Academic detailing to increase colorectal cancer screening by primary care practices in Appalachian Pennsylvania.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer death. Screening is a primary method to prevent CRC, yet screening remains low in the U.S. and particularly in Appalachian Pennsylvania, a largely rural area with high rates of poverty, limited health care access, and increased CRC incidence and mortality rates. Receiving a physician recommendation for CRC screening is a primary predictor for patient adherence with screening guidelines. One strategy to disseminate practice-oriented interventions is academic detailing (AD), a method that transfers knowledge or methods to physicians, nurses or office staff through the visit(s) of a trained educator. The objective of this study was to determine acceptability and feasibility of AD among primary care practices in rural Appalachian Pennsylvania to increase CRC screening.
  
  
  METHODS
  A multi-site, practice-based, intervention study with pre- and 6-month post-intervention review of randomly selected medical records, pre- and post-intervention surveys, as well as a post-intervention key informant interview was conducted. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients current with CRC screening recommendations and having received a CRC screening within the past year. Four practices received three separate AD visits to review four different learning modules.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We reviewed 323 records pre-intervention and 301 post-intervention. The prevalence of being current with screening recommendation was 56% in the pre-intervention, and 60% in the post-intervention (p=0.29), while the prevalence of having been screened in the past year increased from 17% to 35% (p<0.001). Colonoscopies were the most frequently performed screening test. Provider knowledge was improved and AD was reported to be an acceptable intervention for CRC performance improvement by the practices.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  AD appears to be acceptable and feasible for primary care providers in rural Appalachia. A ceiling effect for CRC screening may have been a factor in no change in overall screening rates. While the study was not designed to test the efficacy of AD on CRC screening rates, our evidence suggests that AD is acceptable and may be efficacious in increasing recent CRC screening rates in Appalachian practices which could be tested through a randomized controlled study.
authors: Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA. wcurry@psu.edu
authors: William J
authors: WJ
authors: Curry
authors: Eugene J
authors: EJ
authors: Lengerich
authors: Brenda C
authors: BC
authors: Kluhsman
authors: Marie A
authors: MA
authors: Graybill
authors: Jason Z
authors: JZ
authors: Liao
authors: Eric W
authors: EW
authors: Schaefer
authors: Angela M
authors: AM
authors: Spleen
authors: Mark B
authors: MB
authors: Dignan
references: J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;21(4):326-33
references: 18612059
references: Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011 Jan;20 Suppl 1:S42-4
references: 21245681
references: J Cancer Surviv. 2007 Sep;1(3):205-11
references: 18648971
references: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Feb 23;169(4):364-71
references: 19237720
references: J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):6S-12S
references: 11560964
references: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Feb;13(2):314-9
references: 14973108
references: J Gen Intern Med. 1990 May-Jun;5(3):218-24
references: 2341921
references: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S67-74
references: 18541190
references: Prev Med. 2003 Dec;37(6 Pt 1):627-34
references: 14636796
references: Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):939-44
references: 16116360
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Oct;18(5):355-9
references: 19812097
references: Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):646-51
references: 20494241
references: Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16;137(2):132-41
references: 12118972
references: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Feb;15(2):389-94
references: 16492934
references: Arch Intern Med. 1989 Aug;149(8):1866-72
references: 2764657
references: J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;19(2):110-21
references: 16513899
references: PLoS Med. 2008 Sep 30;5(9):e183
references: 18767901
references: Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;59(3):253-60
references: 12761604
references: J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5370-5
references: 19826133
references: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 12;169(1):47-55
references: 19139323
references: Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S109-16
references: 18725822
references: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S21-5
references: 18541184
references: Med Care. 1986 Aug;24(8):659-66
references: 3736141
references: J Rural Health. 2005 Winter;21(1):39-47
references: 15667008
references: ANZ J Surg. 2001 Mar;71(3):147-53
references: 11277143
references: Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):110-7
references: 20117566