title: Urban - rural disparities in antenatal care utilization: a study of two cohorts of pregnant women in Vietnam.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The use of antenatal care (ANC) varies between countries and in different settings within each country. Most previous studies of ANC in Vietnam have been cross-sectional, and conducted in rural areas before the year 2000. This study aims to compare the pattern and the adequacy of ANC used in rural and urban Vietnam following two cohorts of pregnant women.
  
  
  METHODS
  A comparative study with two cohorts comprising totally 2132 pregnant women were followed in two health and demographic surveillance sites, one rural and one urban in Hanoi province, Vietnam. The women were quarterly interviewed using a structured questionnaire until delivery. The primary information obtained was the number and the content of ANC visits.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Almost all women reported some use of ANC. The average number of visits was much lower in the rural setting (4.4) than in the urban (7.7). In the rural area, 77.2% of women had at least three visits and 69.1% attended ANC during the first trimester. The corresponding percentages for the urban women were 97.2% and 97.2%. Only 20.3% of the rural women compared to 81.1% of the urban women received all core ANC services. As a result, the adequate use of ANC was 5.2 times in the urban than in the rural setting (78.3% compared to 15.2%). Nearly all women received ultrasound examination during pregnancy with a mean value of 6.0 scans per woman in the urban area and 3.5 in the rural. Most rural women used ANC at commune health centres and private clinics while urban women mainly visited public hospitals. Expenditure related to ANC utilization for the urban women was 7.1 times that for the urban women.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The women in the rural area attended ANC later, had fewer visits and received much fewer services than urban women. The large disparity in ANC adequacy between the two settings suggests special attention for the ANC programme in rural areas focusing on its content. Revision and enforcement of the national guidelines to improve the behaviour and practice of both users and providers are necessary.
authors: Family Medicine Department, Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam. tktoan@yahoo.com
authors: Toan K
authors: TK
authors: Tran
authors: Chuc T K
authors: CT
authors: Nguyen
authors: Hinh D
authors: HD
authors: Nguyen
authors: Bo
authors: B
authors: Eriksson
authors: Goran
authors: G
authors: Bondjers
authors: Karin
authors: K
authors: Gottvall
authors: Henry
authors: H
authors: Ascher
authors: Max
authors: M
authors: Petzold
references: Public Health Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug;24(4):300-10
references: 17553019
references: J Adv Nurs. 2008 Feb;61(3):244-60
references: 18197860
references: Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2007 Sep;38(5):927-35
references: 18041314
references: J Pak Med Assoc. 2002 Apr;52(4):138-42
references: 12174476
references: Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(10):1849-69
references: 12383469
references: Trop Doct. 2005 Apr;35(2):110-1
references: 15970041
references: BMC Public Health. 2010 Oct 14;10:608
references: 20946681
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Oct;85(10):812-9
references: 18038064
references: Public Health Rep. 2006 Jul-Aug;121(4):468-75
references: 16827450
references: CMAJ. 2010 Feb 9;182(2):143-51
references: 20048009
references: Matern Child Health J. 2011 Nov;15(8):1356-62
references: 20827503
references: Reprod Health Matters. 2007 May;15(29):163-71
references: 17512387
references: Med Care. 2009 Nov;47(11):1129-35
references: 19786915
references: Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2003;62:3-7
references: 14578073
references: J Trop Med Hyg. 1993 Apr;96(2):76-85
references: 8096252
references: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(6):1009-17
references: 18635302
references: Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Feb;11(1):15-20
references: 16364704
references: J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Nov;22(6):600-3
references: 12554244
references: Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1996 Jun;27(2):325-32
references: 9279997
references: BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1107
references: 16282407
references: Int J Health Plann Manage. 2000 Jul-Sep;15(3):221-35
references: 11184655