title: Atypical epigenetic mark in an atypical location: cytosine methylation at asymmetric (CNN) sites within the body of a non-repetitive tomato gene.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Eukaryotic DNA methylation is one of the most studied epigenetic processes, as it results in a direct and heritable covalent modification triggered by external stimuli. In contrast to mammals, plant DNA methylation, which is stimulated by external cues exemplified by various abiotic types of stress, is often found not only at CG sites but also at CNG (N denoting A, C or T) and CNN (asymmetric) sites. A genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis has shown that CNN methylation is preferentially concentrated in transposon genes and non-coding repetitive elements. We are particularly interested in investigating the epigenetics of plant species with larger and more complex genomes than Arabidopsis, particularly with regards to the associated alterations elicited by abiotic stress.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We describe the existence of CNN-methylated epialleles that span Asr1, a non-transposon, protein-coding gene from tomato plants that lacks an orthologous counterpart in Arabidopsis. In addition, to test the hypothesis of a link between epigenetics modifications and the adaptation of crop plants to abiotic stress, we exhaustively explored the cytosine methylation status in leaf Asr1 DNA, a model gene in our system, resulting from water-deficit stress conditions imposed on tomato plants. We found that drought conditions brought about removal of methyl marks at approximately 75 of the 110 asymmetric (CNN) sites analysed, concomitantly with a decrease of the repressive H3K27me3 epigenetic mark and a large induction of expression at the RNA level. When pinpointing those sites, we observed that demethylation occurred mostly in the intronic region.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results demonstrate a novel genomic distribution of CNN methylation, namely in the transcribed region of a protein-coding, non-repetitive gene, and the changes in those epigenetic marks that are caused by water stress. These findings may represent a general mechanism for the acquisition of new epialleles in somatic cells, which are pivotal for regulating gene expression in plants.
authors: Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires e IFIByNE-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
authors: Rodrigo M
authors: RM
authors: González
authors: Martiniano M
authors: MM
authors: Ricardi
authors: Norberto D
authors: ND
authors: Iusem
references: PLoS One. 2010 Mar 03;5(3):e9514
references: 20209086
references: Genes Dev. 2008 Jun 15;22(12):1597-606
references: 18559476
references: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 May-Jun;1769(5-6):276-86
references: 17341434
references: PLoS Biol. 2007 Jul;5(7):e174
references: 17579518
references: Science. 2008 Apr 25;320(5875):489-92
references: 18436779
references: Cell. 2006 Sep 22;126(6):1189-201
references: 16949657
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8449-54
references: 8710891
references: Curr Biol. 2002 Jul 9;12(13):1138-44
references: 12121623
references: Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008 Jan;49(1):61-72
references: 17948278
references: Ann Bot. 2007 Aug;100(2):205-17
references: 17576658
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 12;9 Suppl 12:S9
references: 19091032
references: J Genet Genomics. 2010 Jan;37(1):1-12
references: 20171573
references: BMC Res Notes. 2008 Jul 28;1:54
references: 18710507
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Apr;5(2):101-6
references: 11856603
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 11;9:371
references: 18786255
references: Curr Biol. 2007 Feb 20;17(4):379-84
references: 17239600
references: Planta. 2008 Aug;228(3):391-9
references: 18488247
references: Electrophoresis. 2006 Jul;27(14):2846-56
references: 16637018
references: Cell. 2008 May 2;133(3):523-36
references: 18423832
references: Epigenetics. 2009 Feb 16;4(2):119-24
references: 19384058
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Apr;12(2):133-9
references: 19179104
references: Mol Gen Genet. 1997 Feb 20;253(5):581-8
references: 9065691
references: Nature. 2002 Apr 4;416(6880):556-60
references: 11898023
references: Gene. 2006 Aug 15;378:74-83
references: 16822623
references: Plant Cell. 2009 Apr;21(4):1053-69
references: 19376930
references: PLoS One. 2008 Oct 01;3(10):e3306
references: 18827894
references: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Jan 26;352(4):831-5
references: 17157822
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1660-5
references: 19164525
references: Nature. 2007 May 24;447(7143):418-24
references: 17522675
references: Dev Growth Differ. 2010 Aug;52(6):555-66
references: 20646028
references: Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2353-64
references: 17406479
references: Epigenetics. 2009 Nov 16;4(8):557-63
references: 19934651
references: Planta. 2008 May;227(6):1213-9
references: 18270732
references: PLoS Genet. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000280
references: 19043555
references: Science. 2010 Oct 29;330(6004):622-7
references: 21030646
references: Science. 2001 Jun 15;292(5524):2077-80
references: 11349138
references: J Exp Bot. 2011 Mar;62(6):1951-60
references: 21193578
references: Plant Physiol. 2008 Sep;148(1):6-24
references: 18772351
references: Plant Methods. 2010 Apr 09;6:11
references: 20380723
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011 Apr;14(2):179-86
references: 21233005
references: Genes Dev. 2007 Feb 1;21(3):267-77
references: 17242155
references: Am J Bot. 2001 Oct;88(10):1888-902
references: 21669622
references: EMBO J. 2009 Apr 22;28(8):1078-86
references: 19262562
references: FEBS Lett. 2011 Jul 7;585(13):2008-15
references: 20727353
references: BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Sep 10;8:92
references: 18783613
references: Epigenetics. 2011 Mar;6(3):344-54
references: 21150311