title: Effectiveness of a Wii balance board-based system (eBaViR) for balance rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial in patients with acquired brain injury.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Acquired brain injury (ABI) is the main cause of death and disability among young adults. In most cases, survivors can experience balance instability, resulting in functional impairments that are associated with diminished health-related quality of life. Traditional rehabilitation therapy may be tedious. This can reduce motivation and adherence to the treatment and thus provide a limited benefit to patients with balance disorders. We present eBaViR (easy Balance Virtual Rehabilitation), a system based on the Nintendo® Wii Balance Board® (WBB), which has been designed by clinical therapists to improve standing balance in patients with ABI through motivational and adaptative exercises. We hypothesize that eBaViR, is feasible, safe and potentially effective in enhancing standing balance.
  
  
  METHODS
  In this contribution, we present a randomized and controlled single blinded study to assess the influence of a WBB-based virtual rehabilitation system on balance rehabilitation with ABI hemiparetic patients. This study describes the eBaViR system and evaluates its effectiveness considering 20 one-hour-sessions of virtual reality rehabilitation (n = 9) versus standard rehabilitation (n = 8). Effectiveness was evaluated by means of traditional static and dynamic balance scales.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The final sample consisted of 11 men and 6 women. Mean ± SD age was 47.3 ± 17.8 and mean ± SD chronicity was 570.9 ± 313.2 days. Patients using eBaViR had a significant improvement in static balance (p = 0.011 in Berg Balance Scale and p = 0.011 in Anterior Reaches Test) compared to patients who underwent traditional therapy. Regarding dynamic balance, the results showed significant improvement over time in all these measures, but no significant group effect or group-by-time interaction was detected for any of them, which suggests that both groups improved in the same way. There were no serious adverse events during treatment in either group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results suggest that eBaViR represents a safe and effective alternative to traditional treatment to improve static balance in the ABI population. These results have encouraged us to reinforce the virtual treatment with new exercises, so an evolution of the system is currently being developed.
authors: Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación en Bioingeniería y Tecnología Orientada al Ser Humano, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain. jgil@upv.es
authors: José-Antonio
authors: JA
authors: Gil-Gómez
authors: Roberto
authors: R
authors: Lloréns
authors: Mariano
authors: M
authors: Alcañiz
authors: Carolina
authors: C
authors: Colomer
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4966-70
references: 2052578
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;88(1):32-6
references: 17207672
references: Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Jul 30;29(14):1139-46; discussion 1147-52
references: 17613000
references: J Neurol Sci. 2009 Dec 15;287(1-2):89-93
references: 19733860
references: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 May;76(5):621
references: 15834015
references: Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005 Jun;8(3):187-211; discussion 212-9
references: 15971970
references: J Rehabil Med. 2010 May;42(5):437-41
references: 20544153
references: J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004 Dec 10;1(1):10
references: 15679945
references: Clin Rehabil. 2004 Nov;18(7):801-10
references: 15573837
references: J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010 Sep;34(3):127-37
references: 20716987
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 May;76(5):406-12
references: 7741609
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Aug;74(8):796-800
references: 8347063
references: J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
references: 1202204
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):105-10
references: 16401447
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
references: 1991946
references: Phys Ther. 2002 Feb;82(2):128-37
references: 11856064
references: Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Jul-Aug;31(4):936-42
references: 20381997
references: Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):345-52
references: 21131259
references: Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(5):519-23
references: 14654886
references: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):341-6
references: 17353462
references: Phys Ther. 2008 Oct;88(10):1196-207
references: 18689607
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;154:61-6
references: 20543271
references: Phys Ther. 1988 Jun;68(6):970-6
references: 3375321
references: Can J Public Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;83 Suppl 2:S7-11
references: 1468055
references: Clin Rehabil. 2003 Nov;17(7):780-6
references: 14606746
references: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;82(2):136-43
references: 20826872
references: Gait Posture. 2011 Feb;33(2):303-5
references: 21087865
references: Gait Posture. 2005 Nov;22(3):267-81
references: 16214666
references: Int J Stroke. 2010 Feb;5(1):47-51
references: 20088994
references: Physiother Res Int. 2000;5(1):19-32
references: 10785908
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):480-97
references: 7790829
references: Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):281-6
references: 19850444
references: Gait Posture. 2010 Mar;31(3):307-10
references: 20005112
references: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Nov;47(11):744-8
references: 16225737
references: Stroke. 2005 Jul;36(7):1480-4
references: 15947263
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Jun;69(6):395-400
references: 3377664
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Feb;86(2):190-6
references: 15706542
references: Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):44-56
references: 19443347
references: JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2271-81
references: 12425704
references: J Gerontol. 1990 Nov;45(6):M192-7
references: 2229941