title: Outcome of spinal decompression in Cauda Equina syndrome presenting late in developing countries: case series of 50 cases.
abstract: The purpose of this study is to find the clinical outcome of decompression of Cauda Equina presenting late in the course of disease. There were 33 males and 17 females with average age of 48 years, ranging from 25 to 85 years. All patients presented to us with a fully developed Cauda Equina syndrome (CES). All of them presented late with mean delay of 12.2 days. Time interval between bladder and bowel dysfunction and admission to hospital varied from 1 to 35 days. The average follow-up was 34.5 months, ranging from 12 to 60 months. There was no statistically significant difference in time of delay in surgery between the recovered and non-recovered group as tested by Student's t test. But there was a statistically significant positive correlation between duration taken for total recovery and delay in surgery. Anal wink as a predictor of bladder and bowel recovery also showed statistical significance, as patients with an absence had a poorer prognosis for bladder recovery. The result of surgery in CES is not as dramatic and fast as seen after routine disc surgery. Some improvement can be expected with decompression even in those patients presenting late and results are not universally poor as previously thought. The treating physicians of such patients should be aware that the recovery in this group of patients can take an exceptionally long time and hence should involve in constant reassurance and rehabilitation of the patient. Presence of anal wink is a very good predictor of bladder and bowel recovery.
authors: Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh 160012, India. sarvdeepdhatt_2008@yahoo.in
authors: Sarvdeep
authors: S
authors: Dhatt
authors: Naveen
authors: N
authors: Tahasildar
authors: Sujit Kumar
authors: SK
authors: Tripathy
authors: Raj
authors: R
authors: Bahadur
authors: Mandeep
authors: M
authors: Dhillon
references: Br J Neurosurg. 2002 Aug;16(4):325-8
references: 12389883
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Mar;68(3):386-91
references: 2936744
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 15;32(2):207-16
references: 17224816
references: Br J Surg. 1965 Nov;52(11):858-65
references: 5842973
references: Aust N Z J Surg. 1993 Dec;63(12):927-34
references: 8285904
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 1;25(3):348-51; discussion 352
references: 10703108
references: Eur Spine J. 2007 Dec;16(12):2143-51
references: 17828560
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jul 15;32(16):1735-47
references: 17632394
references: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jun 6;282(6279):1852-4
references: 6786651
references: Br J Neurosurg. 2003 Apr;17(2):164-7
references: 12820760
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965 May;47:224-35
references: 14302723
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Sep;16(9):1022-9
references: 1948393
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 15;25(12):1515-22
references: 10851100
references: Neurosurgery. 1993 May;32(5):743-6; discussion 746-7
references: 8492849