title: Abdominal donor-site outcomes for medial versus lateral deep inferior epigastric artery branch perforator harvest.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Damage to the intercostal nerves during deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap harvest compromises abdominal wall integrity. Intercostal motor nerves are closely associated with the lateral branch of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA); therefore, the authors hypothesized that medial branch flap donor sites would develop fewer abdominal bulges/hernias.
  
  
  METHODS
  The authors evaluated 2043 consecutive abdomen-based free flap breast reconstructions performed at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 2000 and 2010. Of these, the authors included only DIEP or muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps in which it could be clearly determined from which branch perforators were harvested. The authors examined the relationship between patient and treatment factors and donor-site hernia and bulge.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The authors included 501 patients with a mean follow-up of 31 months [289 medial branch flaps (47 percent) and 326 lateral branch flaps (53 percent)]. Patient demographics, reconstruction timing, DIEP versus muscle-sparing free TRAM, unilateral versus bilateral distribution, and percentage of mesh closures were similar between the branch harvest groups. Twenty-eight donor sites (4.6 percent) developed a bulge/hernia. Abdominal bulge/hernia rates were similar between the medial and lateral branch donor sites (3.5 percent and 5.5 percent, respectively) (p = 0.20).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This is the largest study to date comparing donor-site morbidity following medial or lateral DIEA branch harvest. Choice of perforators should be based on quality, size, and orientation. Medial versus lateral row perforators should not be harvested preferentially to reduce donor-site hernia or bulge.
authors: Houston, Texas From the Departments of Plastic Surgery and Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.
authors: Patrick B
authors: PB
authors: Garvey
authors: Seroos
authors: S
authors: Salavati
authors: Lei
authors: L
authors: Feng
authors: Charles E
authors: CE
authors: Butler
references: Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Robb G, Evans G. Abdominal wall strength, bulging, and hernia after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:616–619.
references: Nahabedian MY, Dooley W, Singh N, Manson PN. Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: The role of muscle preservation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:91–101.
references: Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:737–746.
references: Blondeel PN, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, et al. The donor morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50:322–330.
references: Mizgala CL, Hartrampf CR, Bennett GK. Assessment of the abdominal wall after pedicled TRAM flap surgery: 5- to 7-year follow-up of 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:988–1002.
references: Futter CM, Webster MHC, Hagen S, Mitchell SL. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:578–583.
references: Bottero L, Lefaucheur J, Fadhul S, Raulo Y, Collins ED, Lantieri L. Electromyographic assessment of rectus abdominis muscle function after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:156–161.
references: Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: Is there a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:436–444.
references: Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1153–1160.
references: Allen RJ. DIEP versus TRAM for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:2478.
references: Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Weldon ME. Immediate breast reconstruction: Why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:255–261.
references: Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Miller MJ, et al. The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: One center's experience with 211 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:234–241.
references: Selber JC, Serletti JM. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: Myth and reality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:50–58.
references: Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: A meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:752–764.
references: Vega S, Smartt JM, Jiang S, et al. 500 Consecutive patients with free TRAM flap breast reconstruction: A single surgeon's experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:329–339.
references: Rozen WM, Tran TMN, Barrington MJ, Ashton MW. Avoiding denervation of the rectus abdominis muscle in DIEP flap harvest III: A functional study of the nerves to the rectus using anesthetic blockade. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:519–522.
references: Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Kiil BJ, et al. Avoiding denervation of rectus abdominis in DIEP flap harvest II: An intraoperative assessment of the nerves to rectus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1321–1325.
references: Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Murray ACA, Taylor GI. Avoiding denervation of rectus abdominis in DIEP flap harvest: The importance of medial row perforators. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:710–716.
references: Van Belle G. Biostatistics: A Methodology for the Health Sciences.2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2004.
references: Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pocakj BA, Gray RJ, Samson TD. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:447–457.
references: Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, et al. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: A comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1711–1720.
references: Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:32–38.
references: Bonde CT, Christensen DE, Elberg JJ. Ten years' experience of free flaps for breast reconstruction in a Danish microsurgical centre: An audit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40:8–12.
references: Scheer AS, Novak CB, Neligan PC, Lipa JE. Complications associated with breast reconstruction using a perforator flap compared with a free TRAM flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:355–358.
references: Wong C, Saint-Cyr M, Mojallal A, et al. Perforasomes of the DIEP flap: Vascular anatomy of the lateral versus medial row perforators and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:772–783.
references: Baumann DB, Lin HY, Chevray PM. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1335–1342.
references: Holm C, Mayr M, Hofter E, Ninkovic M. Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: A clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:37–44.
references: Holm C, Tegeler J, Mayr M, Becker A, Pfeiffer UJ, Muhlbauer W. Monitoring free flaps using laser-induced fluorescence of indocyanine green: A preliminary experience. Microsurgery 2002;22:278–287.