title: Outpatient follow-up of patients hospitalized for acute leptospirosis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The outcome of leptospirosis after the resolution of acute disease, either spontaneously or after treatment, is not well described. The aim of this study was to assess the possible sequelae of acute leptospirosis after hospital discharge.
  
  
  METHODS
  We report here a prospective study carried out in São Paulo, Brazil in which patients hospitalized for leptospirosis were followed in the outpatient setting.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-seven patients were serially assessed: 32 severe and 15 mild cases. Early and late complications were not common in either group, but subjective complaints were common in the first few weeks after hospital discharge (53% of severe cases, 40% of mild cases). Two patients had continuing complaints: one had profound general malaise and the other developed new onset panic disorder. The sample analyzed represented 26% of the patients hospitalized with leptospirosis in the city of São Paulo during the study period. The duration of follow-up was an average of approximately 20 days at the first visit, and approximately 40 days at the second visit. Forty-seven patients came for one follow-up visit and 22 of the same patients had two follow-up visits.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  While two of 47 patients reported continuing symptoms after hospitalization for acute leptospirosis, no definitive, objective evidence of chronic sequelae due to this infection was proven. While preliminary, these observations point to the need for a prospective, rigorous and systematic study to definitively determine and characterize late complications and chronic disease after acute leptospirosis.
authors: Institute of Infectology Emilio Ribas, São Paulo, Brazil.
authors: Anne
authors: A
authors: Spichler
authors: Daniel
authors: D
authors: Athanazio
authors: Antonio C
authors: AC
authors: Seguro
authors: Joseph M
authors: JM
authors: Vinetz
references: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Jun;18(6):1128-34
references: 12748345
references: Neurology. 2009 Dec 1;73(22):1923-4
references: 19949038
references: Bull World Health Organ. 1961;24:45-58
references: 13685591
references: Lancet. 1999 Sep 4;354(9181):820-5
references: 10485724
references: Lancet Infect Dis. 2003 Dec;3(12):757-71
references: 14652202
references: Nephron Clin Pract. 2004;98(1):c8-14
references: 15361699
references: Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;16(2):331-4
references: 20113574
references: Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2001 Oct;14(5):527-38
references: 11964872
references: Postgrad Med J. 2001 Sep;77(911):589-90
references: 11524519
references: Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2006 Jan;8(1):51-8
references: 16448601
references: Indian J Med Res. 2006 Aug;124(2):155-62
references: 17015929
references: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1992 May-Jun;34(3):217-21
references: 1342073
references: Br Med J. 1937 Jan 2;1(3965):7-11
references: 20780399
references: Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;29(6):1561-3
references: 10585813
references: Indian J Med Res. 2006 Aug;124(2):125-8
references: 17015926
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1958 Jun 3;70(3):393-413
references: 13559904
references: Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R31
references: 17331245
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Jul;124(1):71-9
references: 9222235
references: J Postgrad Med. 2005 Jul-Sep;51(3):184-8
references: 16333190
references: Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Oct;22(4-5):343-6
references: 14576997
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Dec;79(6):911-4
references: 19052303
references: Res Microbiol. 2003 Oct;154(8):581-6
references: 14527659
references: Int J Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;15(1):e38-43
references: 21112804