title: Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: a case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Qualitative research is used increasingly alongside trials of complex interventions to explore processes, contextual factors, or intervention characteristics that may have influenced trial outcomes. Qualitative research conducted alongside trials can also be used to shed light on the results of systematic reviews of effectiveness by looking for factors that can help explain heterogeneous results across trials. In a Cochrane review on the effects of using lay health workers on maternal and child health and infectious disease control, we identified 82 trials. These trials showed promising benefits but results were heterogeneous.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To use qualitative studies conducted alongside these trials to explore factors and processes that might have influenced intervention outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  We attempted to identify qualitative research carried out alongside the trials by contacting trial authors, checking papers for references to qualitative research, searching Pubmed for related studies, and carrying out citation searches. For those qualitative studies that we included, we extracted information regarding study objective, data collection and analysis methods, and key themes and categories.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For 52 (63%) of the trials, we found no qualitative research that had been conducted alongside the trials. For 16 (20%) trials, some form of qualitative data collection had been done but was unavailable or had been done before the trial. For 14 (17%) trials, qualitative research had been done during or shortly after the trial, although descriptions of qualitative methods and results were often sparse. Most of these 14 studies aimed to elicit trial participants' perspectives and experiences of the intervention. A common theme was participants' appreciation of the lay health workers' shared circumstances, for instance with regard to social background or experience of the health condition. In six studies, researchers explored the experiences of the lay health workers themselves. Issues included the importance of regular supervision and health professionals' support or lack of support.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Qualitative studies carried out alongside trials of complex interventions could offer opportunities to authors of systematic reviews of effectiveness wishing to understand the heterogeneity of trial results. For interventions of lay health worker programmes at least, too few such studies exist at present for these opportunities to be realised.
authors: Department of Global Health and Welfare, SINTEF Society and Technology, Oslo, Norway. claire.glenton@nokc.no
authors: Claire
authors: C
authors: Glenton
authors: Simon
authors: S
authors: Lewin
authors: Inger B
authors: IB
authors: Scheel
references: Health Policy. 2005 Jul;73(1):92-103
references: 15911060
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Sep;58(9):788-93
references: 15310806
references: Lancet. 2000 Nov 11;356(9242):1643-7
references: 11089824
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jul 24;8:42
references: 17650326
references: BMJ. 2009 Sep 10;339:b3496
references: 19744976
references: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2005 Mar 16;5(1):6
references: 15771772
references: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(8):1701-10
references: 15967558
references: Eval Program Plann. 2008 May;31(2):209-16
references: 18403017
references: BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2003 Aug 21;3(1):3
references: 12932300
references: J Hum Lact. 2002 Feb;18(1):7-12
references: 11845742
references: J Pediatr Psychol. 1998 Apr;23(2):99-109
references: 9585636
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Feb;56(2):119-27
references: 11812811
references: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Mar;96(3):281-8
references: 2653416
references: Am J Prev Med. 2001 Feb;20(2):103-7
references: 11165450
references: Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(6):599-608
references: 17852975
references: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Dec 09;9:82
references: 20003210
references: BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6
references: 16484270
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):148-52
references: 12448807
references: Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):e1047-59
references: 18450847
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct 13;10:286
references: 20942900
references: BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
references: 18824488
references: Diabetes Educ. 2004 May-Jun;30(3):476-84
references: 15208845
references: Health Technol Assess. 2007 May;11(16):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-71
references: 17462166
references: Health Care Superv. 1998 Sep;17(1):37-47
references: 10182173
references: J Perinatol. 2003 Dec;23(8):646-51
references: 14647161
references: BMJ. 2004 Jan 3;328(7430):26
references: 14703543
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Jun;9(6):673-9
references: 15971396
references: J Rural Health. 2004 Summer;20(3):221-30
references: 15298096
references: Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):970-9
references: 15364188
references: Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):179-86
references: 16128971
references: Pediatr Phys Ther. 2002 Fall;14(3):145-53
references: 17053697
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD004015
references: 20238326
references: BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6
references: 10987780
references: Inj Prev. 2008 Jun;14(3):164-9
references: 18523108
references: J Health Organ Manag. 2007;21(6):554-72
references: 18062608