title: Neural bases of recovery after brain injury.
abstract: Substantial data have accumulated over the past decade indicating that the adult brain is capable of substantial structural and functional reorganization after stroke. While some limited recovery is known to occur spontaneously, especially within the first month post-stroke, there is currently significant optimism that new interventions based on the modulation of neuroplasticity mechanisms will provide greater functional benefits in a larger population of stroke survivors. To place this information in the context of current thinking about brain plasticity, this review outlines the basic theories of why spontaneous recovery occurs, and introduces important principles to explain the effects of post-stroke behavioral experience on neural plasticity.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Readers will be able to: (a) explain the three classic theories to explain spontaneous recovery after focal brain injury, (b) explain the neurophysiological effects of post-injury rehabilitative therapy on functional organization in motor cortex, (c) readers will be able to describe some of the variables that impact the effects of post-stroke behavioral experience on neuroplasticity, and (d) readers will be able to explain some of the current laboratory-based approaches to modifying brain circuits after stroke that might soon be translated to human application.
authors: Landon Center on Aging and Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Kansas University Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. rnudo@kumc.edu
authors: Randolph J
authors: RJ
authors: Nudo
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1692-8
references: 19801058
references: J Neurosci. 1996 Jan 15;16(2):785-807
references: 8551360
references: JAMA. 2006 Nov 1;296(17):2095-104
references: 17077374
references: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Jul;74(1):27-55
references: 10873519
references: Circulation. 2010 Feb 23;121(7):e46-e215
references: 20019324
references: Science. 1996 Jun 21;272(5269):1791-4
references: 8650578
references: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007 Jan;27(1):76-85
references: 16639424
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1827-9
references: 20400553
references: Acta Neurol Scand. 2000 May;101(5):321-6
references: 10987321
references: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Dec;13(12):1496-504
references: 21057507
references: Stroke. 2009 Jul;40(7):2438-41
references: 19478213
references: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35
references: 20424192
references: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;19(6):417-23
references: 21051004
references: Stroke. 1986 Sep-Oct;17(5):817-30
references: 3532434
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:385-94
references: 19673813
references: Nature. 2006 Nov 2;444(7115):56-60
references: 17057705
references: J Comp Neurol. 2010 Mar 1;518(5):586-621
references: 20034062
references: J Physiol. 1949 Mar 1;108(1):Proc., 33
references: 18200702
references: J Neurophysiol. 1990 Jan;63(1):82-104
references: 2299388
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Dec;16(6):638-44
references: 17084614
references: J Neurosci. 1992 Aug;12(8):2918-47
references: 1494940
references: Nature. 1988 Mar 31;332(6163):444-5
references: 3352741
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 2;25(44):10167-79
references: 16267224
references: Curr Opin Neurol. 2006 Feb;19(1):84-90
references: 16415682