title: ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The present study compared the neural correlates of an intramodally and a crossmodally acquired second language (L2). Deaf people who had learned their L1, German Sign Language (DGS), and their L2, German, through the visual modality were compared with hearing L2 learners of German and German native speakers. Correct and incorrect German sentences were presented word by word on a computer screen while the electroencephalogram was recorded. At the end of each sentence, the participants judged whether or not the sentence was correct. Two types of violations were realized: Either a semantically implausible noun or a violation of subject-verb number agreement was embedded at a sentence medial position.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Semantic errors elicited an N400, followed by a late positivity in all groups. In native speakers of German, verb-agreement violations were followed by a left lateralized negativity, which has been associated with an automatic parsing process. We observed a syntax related negativity in both high performing hearing and deaf L2 learners as well. Finally, this negativity was followed by a posteriorly distributed positivity in all three groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although deaf learners have learned German as an L2 mainly via the visual modality they seem to engage comparable processing mechanisms as hearing L2 learners. Thus, the data underscore the modality transcendence of language.
authors: Biologische Psychologie & Neuropsychologie, Universität Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 11, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. nils.skotara@uni-hamburg.de
authors: Nils
authors: N
authors: Skotara
authors: Monique
authors: M
authors: Kügow
authors: Uta
authors: U
authors: Salden
authors: Barbara
authors: B
authors: Hänel-Faulhaber
authors: Brigitte
authors: B
authors: Röder
references: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Apr;17(4):909-17
references: 16731883
references: J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 Mar;31(2):165-93
references: 12022794
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1212-28
references: 16197679
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):47-58
references: 11240111
references: Nature. 1984 Jan 12-18;307(5947):161-3
references: 6690995
references: Brain Lang. 2003 Dec;87(3):369-84
references: 14642540
references: Neurosci Lett. 1998 Jan 30;241(2-3):83-6
references: 9507926
references: J Commun Disord. 2003 May-Jun;36(3):233-40
references: 12742670
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1987;39:325-30
references: 3477442
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Spring;3(2):151-65
references: 23972090
references: Psychophysiology. 1995 May;32(3):274-85
references: 7784536
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Jan;27(1):63-76
references: 15966001
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 May;9(3):318-29
references: 23965010
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Sep;22(5):1219-48
references: 8805821
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Feb;22(2):241-55
references: 15653297
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Dec;10(12):564-70
references: 17071131
references: Brain Lang. 2003 Dec;87(3):345-54
references: 14642537
references: Brain Lang. 2003 Apr;85(1):1-36
references: 12681346
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Oct;16(8):1412-25
references: 15509387
references: Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(7):801-7
references: 11900730
references: Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5
references: 7350657
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Dec 1;2(12):465-8
references: 21227293
references: Neuroimage. 2002 Mar;15(3):647-60
references: 11848708
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):121-34
references: 16417688
references: Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1):2-15
references: 20829699
references: Brain. 1998 Oct;121 ( Pt 10):1841-52
references: 9798741
references: Neuron. 2003 Jan 9;37(1):159-70
references: 12526781
references: J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 May;31(3):211-68
references: 12092710
references: Neuroimage. 2008 Mar 1;40(1):367-88
references: 18248739
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):117-29
references: 12763198
references: Cereb Cortex. 1992 May-Jun;2(3):244-58
references: 1511223
references: Nature. 2002 May 2;417(6884):38
references: 11986658
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998 Apr;8(2):254-8
references: 9635210
references: Brain Lang. 2003 May;85(2):280-96
references: 12735945
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Feb 1;6(2):78-84
references: 15866191
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8784-9
references: 19433795
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Summer;8(3):231-56
references: 23968150
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):786-803
references: 8064247
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Mar;19(1):59-73
references: 14972359