title: Effects of an evidence service on health-system policy makers' use of research evidence: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Health-system policy makers need timely access to synthesised research evidence to inform the policy-making process. No efforts to address this need have been evaluated using an experimental quantitative design. We developed an evidence service that draws inputs from Health Systems Evidence, which is a database of policy-relevant systematic reviews. The reviews have been (a) categorised by topic and type of review; (b) coded by the last year searches for studies were conducted and by the countries in which included studies were conducted; (c) rated for quality; and (d) linked to available user-friendly summaries, scientific abstracts, and full-text reports. Our goal is to evaluate whether a "full-serve" evidence service increases the use of synthesized research evidence by policy analysts and advisors in the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) as compared to a "self-serve" evidence service.
  
  
  METHODS
  We will conduct a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), along with a follow-up qualitative process study in order to explore the findings in greater depth. For the RCT, all policy analysts and policy advisors (n = 168) in a single division of the MOHLTC will be invited to participate. Using a stratified randomized design, participants will be randomized to receive either the "full-serve" evidence service (database access, monthly e-mail alerts, and full-text article availability) or the "self-serve" evidence service (database access only). The trial duration will be ten months (two-month baseline period, six-month intervention period, and two month cross-over period). The primary outcome will be the mean number of site visits/month/user between baseline and the end of the intervention period. The secondary outcome will be participants' intention to use research evidence. For the qualitative study, 15 participants from each trial arm (n = 30) will be purposively sampled. One-on-one semi-structured interviews will be conducted by telephone on their views about and their experiences with the evidence service they received, how helpful it was in their work, why it was helpful (or not helpful), what aspects were most and least helpful and why, and recommendations for next steps.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  To our knowledge, this will be the first RCT to evaluate the effects of an evidence service specifically designed to support health-system policy makers in finding and using research evidence.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01307228.
authors: McMaster Health Forum, Hamilton, Canada. lavisj@mcmaster.ca
authors: John N
authors: JN
authors: Lavis
authors: Michael G
authors: MG
authors: Wilson
authors: Jeremy M
authors: JM
authors: Grimshaw
authors: R Brian
authors: RB
authors: Haynes
authors: Steven
authors: S
authors: Hanna
authors: Parminder
authors: P
authors: Raina
authors: Russell
authors: R
authors: Gruen
authors: Mathieu
authors: M
authors: Ouimet
references: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:S13
references: 20018103
references: J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):37-45
references: 16557509
references: JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1801-8
references: 16622142
references: Res Nurs Health. 2000 Jun;23(3):246-55
references: 10871540
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):239-44
references: 12425783
references: Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):729-68
references: 18070335
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):593-600
references: 16929034
references: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(7):1889-99
references: 16843579
references: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Feb 15;7:10
references: 17302989
references: Br J Health Psychol. 2001 Nov;6(Part 4):347-360
references: 12614509
references: Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Dec 05;4:20
references: 17147809
references: BMJ. 1998 Sep 26;317(7162):858-61
references: 9748183
references: Health Technol Assess. 2004 Feb;8(6):iii-iv, 1-72
references: 14960256
references: Milbank Q. 2002;80(1):125-54
references: 11933791
references: Implement Sci. 2006 Nov 21;1:28
references: 17118180
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:35-48
references: 16053582
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Aug;84(8):620-8
references: 16917649
references: Healthc Policy. 2006 Jan;1(2):21-33
references: 19305650
references: Med Care. 1994 Mar;32(3):202-13
references: 8145598
references: Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):670-6
references: 15520031
references: BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
references: 10625273
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jul;8(3):165-70
references: 12869343
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Jul;55(7):717-22
references: 12160920
references: Implement Sci. 2009 Apr 27;4:23
references: 19397820
references: Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 24;9:29
references: 21702956
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):107-12
references: 11900150
references: PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000141
references: 19936223
references: Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;40(Pt 4):471-99
references: 11795063