title: Structural correlates of taste and smell loss in encephalitis disseminata.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Olfactory dysfunction in MS patients is reported in the literature. MRI of the olfactory bulb (OB) is discussed as a promising new testing method for measuring olfactory function (OF). Aim of this study was to explore reasons for and optimize the detection of olfactory dysfunction in MS patients with MRI.
  
  
  METHODS
  OB and olfactory brain volume was assessed within 34 MS patients by manual segmentation. Olfactory function was tested using the Threshold-Discrimination-Identification-Test (TDI), gustatory function was tested using Taste Strips (TST).
  
  
  RESULTS
  41% of the MS patients displayed olfactory dysfunction (8% of the control group), 16% displayed gustatory dysfunction (5% of the control group). There was a correlation between the OB volume and the number and volume of MS lesions in the olfactory brain. Olfactory brain volume correlated with the volume of lesions in the olfactory brain and the EDSS score. The TST score correlated with the number and volume of lesions in the olfactory brain.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The correlation between a higher number and volume of MS lesions with a decreased OB and olfactory brain volume could help to explain olfactory dysfunction.
authors: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Smell and Taste Consultation Service, Berlin, Germany.
authors: Felix Alexander
authors: FA
authors: Schmidt
authors: Onder
authors: O
authors: Goktas
authors: Lutz
authors: L
authors: Harms
authors: Georg
authors: G
authors: Bohner
authors: Katharina
authors: K
authors: Erb
authors: Bettina
authors: B
authors: Dahlslett
authors: Franca
authors: F
authors: Fleiner
references: J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
references: 1202204
references: Neuroreport. 2005 Apr 4;16(5):475-8
references: 15770154
references: Neurobiol Aging. 2009 May;30(5):838-41
references: 17875348
references: Ann Neurol. 2004 Aug;56(2):173-81
references: 15293269
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;60(12):1193-200
references: 14662551
references: J Neurol Sci. 2010 Feb 15;289(1-2):119-22
references: 19775703
references: Chem Senses. 1997 Feb;22(1):39-52
references: 9056084
references: Laryngorhinootologie. 2004 Nov;83(11):729-34
references: 15538662
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Nov 30;855:608-15
references: 9929657
references: Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2008 May;18(2):233-42, preceding x
references: 18466830
references: Rhinology. 2009 Mar;47(1):3-9
references: 19382487
references: Am J Psychiatry. 2000 May;157(5):828-30
references: 10784482
references: Acad Radiol. 1999 May;6(5):264-72
references: 10228615
references: Laryngorhinootologie. 2009 Jan;88(1):10-6
references: 18814105
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Nov 30;855:781-6
references: 9929684
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71
references: 13688369
references: Laryngoscope. 2006 Mar;116(3):436-9
references: 16540905
references: Rofo. 2010 Feb;182(2):163-8
references: 19998211
references: Mult Scler. 2000 Dec;6(6):386-90
references: 11212134
references: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(4):205-11
references: 10867835
references: Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 15;42(2):498-502
references: 18555701
references: Ann Neurol. 2005 Dec;58(6):840-6
references: 16283615
references: Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
references: 6685237
references: Arch Neurol. 1992 Mar;49(3):238-44
references: 1536625
references: Ann Neurol. 2001 Jul;50(1):121-7
references: 11456302
references: Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):469-73
references: 19070979
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 9;29(49):15410-3
references: 20007465
references: Arch Neurol. 1998 Jan;55(1):84-90
references: 9443714
references: Rhinology. 2003 Mar;41(1):2-6
references: 12677732