title: Comparative methods for association studies: a case study on metabolite variation in a Brassica rapa core collection.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Association mapping is a statistical approach combining phenotypic traits and genetic diversity in natural populations with the goal of correlating the variation present at phenotypic and allelic levels. It is essential to separate the true effect of genetic variation from other confounding factors, such as adaptation to different uses and geographical locations. The rapid availability of large datasets makes it necessary to explore statistical methods that can be computationally less intensive and more flexible for data exploration.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A core collection of 168 Brassica rapa accessions of different morphotypes and origins was explored to find genetic association between markers and metabolites: tocopherols, carotenoids, chlorophylls and folate. A widely used linear model with modifications to account for population structure and kinship was followed for association mapping. In addition, a machine learning algorithm called Random Forest (RF) was used as a comparison. Comparison of results across methods resulted in the selection of a set of significant markers as promising candidates for further work. This set of markers associated to the metabolites can potentially be applied for the selection of genotypes with elevated levels of these metabolites.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The incorporation of the kinship correction into the association model did not reduce the number of significantly associated markers. However incorporation of the STRUCTURE correction (Q matrix) in the linear regression model greatly reduced the number of significantly associated markers. Additionally, our results demonstrate that RF is an interesting complementary method with added value in association studies in plants, which is illustrated by the overlap in markers identified using RF and a linear mixed model with correction for kinship and population structure. Several markers that were selected in RF and in the models with correction for kinship, but not for population structure, were also identified as QTLs in two bi-parental DH populations.
authors: Laboratory of Plant Breeding, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
authors: Dunia
authors: D
authors: Pino Del Carpio
authors: Ram Kumar
authors: RK
authors: Basnet
authors: Ric C H
authors: RC
authors: De Vos
authors: Chris
authors: C
authors: Maliepaard
authors: Maria João
authors: MJ
authors: Paulo
authors: Guusje
authors: G
authors: Bonnema
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Nov 11;23(21):4407-14
references: 7501463
references: J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003 Nov-Dec;43(6):1947-58
references: 14632445
references: PLoS Genet. 2005 Nov;1(5):e60
references: 16292355
references: Genetics. 2007 Feb;175(2):879-89
references: 17151263
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Sep;9(9):441-8
references: 15337494
references: Theor Appl Genet. 2005 May;110(7):1301-14
references: 15806345
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11479-84
references: 11562485
references: PLoS Genet. 2006 Dec;2(12):e190
references: 17194218
references: Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9
references: 16862161
references: Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
references: 10835412
references: Nat Genet. 2006 Feb;38(2):203-8
references: 16380716
references: Nature. 2010 Jun 3;465(7298):627-31
references: 20336072
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 30;10 Suppl 1:S65
references: 19208169
references: Nat Genet. 2001 Jul;28(3):286-9
references: 11431702
references: BMC Genet. 2004 Dec 10;5:32
references: 15588316
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 1;107(22):10302-7
references: 20479233
references: BMC Syst Biol. 2007 Aug 06;1:37
references: 17683609
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Nov;11(11):535-42
references: 17029932
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 4;104(49):19199-203
references: 18048322
references: Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 15;26(6):831-7
references: 20130032
references: New Phytol. 2008;179(4):1017-1032
references: 18564302
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Mar;22(3):506-19
references: 15525701
references: PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4269
references: 19172174
references: Genome. 2007 Oct;50(10):963-73
references: 18059559
references: Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 15;22(16):2028-36
references: 16809386
references: BMC Genet. 2005 Dec 30;6 Suppl 1:S135
references: 16451594
references: Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 Jul 1;7(4):574-578
references: 18784791
references: Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Apr;122(6):1105-18
references: 21193901
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Aug;69(8):4542-8
references: 12902240
references: New Phytol. 2005 May;166(2):427-38
references: 15819907
references: Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87
references: 12930761