title: Eschewing definitions of the therapeutic misconception: a family resemblance analysis.
abstract: Twenty-five years after the term "therapeutic misconception' (TM) first entered the literature, most commentators agree that it remains widespread. However, the majority of scholarly attention has focused on the reasons why a patient cum human subject might confuse the goals of research with the goals of therapy. Although this paper addresses the social and cultural factors that seem to animate the TM among subjects, it also fills a niche in the literature by examining why investigators too might operate under a similar confusion. In framing these issues, the paper expressly adopts a Wittgensteinian approach to evaluating the TM, suggesting that interlocutors do not need any analytic definition of the TM to use the term meaningfully in thinking about the moral implications of the TM in practice.
authors: Department of Bioethics and Interdisciplinary Studies, The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA. goldbergd@ecu.edu
authors: Daniel S
authors: DS
authors: Goldberg