title: A Bayesian method for inferring quantitative information from FRET data.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Understanding biological networks requires identifying their elementary protein interactions and establishing the timing and strength of those interactions. Fluorescence microscopy and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) have the potential to reveal such information because they allow molecular interactions to be monitored in living cells, but it is unclear how best to analyze FRET data. Existing techniques differ in assumptions, manipulations of data and the quantities they derive. To address this variation, we have developed a versatile Bayesian analysis based on clear assumptions and systematic statistics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Our algorithm infers values of the FRET efficiency and dissociation constant, Kd, between a pair of fluorescently tagged proteins. It gives a posterior probability distribution for these parameters, conveying more extensive information than single-value estimates can. The width and shape of the distribution reflects the reliability of the estimate and we used simulated data to determine how measurement noise, data quantity and fluorophore concentrations affect the inference. We are able to show why varying concentrations of donors and acceptors is necessary for estimating Kd. We further demonstrate that the inference improves if additional knowledge is available, for example of the FRET efficiency, which could be obtained from separate fluorescence lifetime measurements.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We present a general, systematic approach for extracting quantitative information on molecular interactions from FRET data. Our method yields both an estimate of the dissociation constant and the uncertainty associated with that estimate. The information produced by our algorithm can help design optimal experiments and is fundamental for developing mathematical models of biochemical networks.
authors: Centre for Systems Biology at Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JD, UK. peter.swain@ed.ac.uk.
authors: Catherine A
authors: CA
authors: Lichten
authors: Peter S
authors: PS
authors: Swain
references: FEBS J. 2009 Feb;276(4):923-42
references: 19215298
references: Biophys J. 2004 Jun;86(6):3923-39
references: 15189889
references: Biophys J. 2008 Feb 1;94(3):986-1000
references: 17921223
references: Biophys J. 1984 May;45(5):939-46
references: 6428482
references: Biophys J. 2006 Sep 1;91(5):L39-41
references: 16815904
references: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005 Feb;15(1):4-14
references: 15718127
references: Biophys J. 2002 Dec;83(6):3652-64
references: 12496132
references: Eur Biophys J. 1998;27(4):377-89
references: 9691467
references: Biophys J. 1998 May;74(5):2702-13
references: 9591694
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Dec;5(12):e1000603
references: 20041172
references: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005 Feb;16(1):19-27
references: 15722011
references: Biophys J. 2006 Jul 15;91(2):759-66
references: 16648159
references: Histochem Cell Biol. 2008 Nov;130(5):833-43
references: 18830616
references: J Biomed Opt. 2007 Sep-Oct;12(5):054011
references: 17994899
references: Sci STKE. 2006 Apr 18;2006(331):re2
references: 16622184
references: J Biol Chem. 2001 Jan 19;276(3):1766-71
references: 11035043
references: Trends Microbiol. 2007 Jan;15(1):45-50
references: 17113776
references: Biophys J. 2003 Jun;84(6):3992-4010
references: 12770904
references: Neuron. 2001 Sep 27;31(6):973-85
references: 11580897
references: Biophys J. 2008 Mar 15;94(6):2320-32
references: 18096627
references: Methods. 2003 Jan;29(1):58-73
references: 12543072
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Feb;10(2):122-33
references: 19139763
references: Trends Biochem Sci. 2007 Sep;32(9):407-14
references: 17764955
references: Cell. 2007 Sep 7;130(5):784-95
references: 17803903
references: Microsc Res Tech. 2004 Jun 1;64(2):185-95
references: 15352090