title: ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  False discovery rate (FDR) control is commonly accepted as the most appropriate error control in multiple hypothesis testing problems. The accuracy of FDR estimation depends on the accuracy of the estimation of p-values from each test and validity of the underlying assumptions of the distribution. However, in many practical testing problems such as in genomics, the p-values could be under-estimated or over-estimated for many known or unknown reasons. Consequently, FDR estimation would then be influenced and lose its veracity.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We propose a new extrapolative method called Constrained Regression Recalibration (ConReg-R) to recalibrate the empirical p-values by modeling their distribution to improve the FDR estimates. Our ConReg-R method is based on the observation that accurately estimated p-values from true null hypotheses follow uniform distribution and the observed distribution of p-values is indeed a mixture of distributions of p-values from true null hypotheses and true alternative hypotheses. Hence, ConReg-R recalibrates the observed p-values so that they exhibit the properties of an ideal empirical p-value distribution. The proportion of true null hypotheses (π0) and FDR are estimated after the recalibration.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  ConReg-R provides an efficient way to improve the FDR estimates. It only requires the p-values from the tests and avoids permutation of the original test data. We demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves FDR estimation on several gene expression datasets obtained from microarray and RNA-seq experiments.
authors: Computational & Mathematical Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore.
authors: Juntao
authors: J
authors: Li
authors: Puteri
authors: P
authors: Paramita
authors: Kwok Pui
authors: KP
authors: Choi
authors: R Krishna Murthy
authors: RK
authors: Karuturi
references: J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2007 Apr;5(2a):281-96
references: 17589962
references: Biostatistics. 2007 Jan;8(1):118-27
references: 16632515
references: Bioinformatics. 2003 Jul 1;19(10):1236-42
references: 12835267
references: Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Jan;14(1):214-29
references: 12529438
references: Genome Res. 2008 Sep;18(9):1509-17
references: 18550803
references: Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 15;21(20):3865-72
references: 16105901
references: Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2005;4:Article34
references: 16646853
references: Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article3
references: 16646809
references: Brief Bioinform. 2010 Jan;11(1):30-9
references: 19854753
references: Science. 1997 Oct 24;278(5338):680-6
references: 9381177
references: Biometrics. 2003 Dec;59(4):1071-81
references: 14969487
references: Mol Biol Cell. 2000 Dec;11(12):4241-57
references: 11102521