title: A study of the effect of physical and chemical stressors on biological integrity within the San Diego hydrologic region.
abstract: Environmental agencies across the United States have searched for adequate methods to assess anthropogenic impacts on the environment. Biological assessments, which compare the taxonomic composition of an aquatic assemblage to relevant biocriteria, have surfaced as an effective method to assess the ecological integrity of US waterbodies. In this study, bioassessment data were collected and analyzed in conjunction with physical habitat and chemical stressor data for streams and rivers within the San Diego basin from 1998 through 2005. Physical stressors such as sediment loading, riparian destruction, and in-stream habitat homogenization affect many locations in the region. However, physical habitat measures alone were found to frequently overestimate the biological integrity of streams in the region. Many sites within the San Diego Basin, although unaffected by physical stressors, continue to exhibit low biological integrity scores. Sites with low biological integrity tend to possess higher specific conductance and salinity compared to sites with high biological integrity. We suggest that one possible reason for these differences is the source water used for municipal purposes.
authors: Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. kristofor.voss@duke.edu
authors: Kristofor A
authors: KA
authors: Voss
authors: Alex
authors: A
authors: Pohlman
authors: Shekar
authors: S
authors: Viswanathan
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Gibson
authors: Joe
authors: J
authors: Purohit
references: Environ Monit Assess. 2001 Mar;67(3):293-322
references: 11334445
references: Environ Pollut. 2004 Jun;129(3):355-62
references: 15016457
references: Environ Manage. 2000 Oct;26(4):437-445
references: 10954807
references: Environ Pollut. 2010 May;158(5):1716-25
references: 20071061
references: Environ Pollut. 2011 Jan;159(1):302-310
references: 20932614
references: Environ Manage. 2005 Apr;35(4):493-504
references: 15902444