title: We should not forget the foot: relations between signs and symptoms, damage, and function in rheumatoid arthritis.
abstract: We studied rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with foot complaints to address the associations between clinical signs and symptoms, radiographic changes, and function in connection with disease duration. Secondly, we describe the contribution of several foot segments to the clinical presentation and function. In 30 RA patients with complaints of their feet, attributed to either signs of arthritis and/or radiographic damage, we compared radiographic, ultrasound, clinical, and functional parameters of the feet and ankle. Pain and swelling of the ankle were correlated weakly but statistically significantly with limitation and disability (0.273 to 0.293) as measured on the 5-Foot Function Index (FFI). The clinical signs of the forefoot joints did not influence any of the functional outcome measures. Radiographic scores for both forefeet (SvdH) and hindfeet (Larsen) were correlated with the total Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) and the 5-FFI limitation subscale. Pain and disease duration, more than radiographic damage, influence the total HAQ DI significantly. With the progression of time, structural damage and function of the rheumatic foot worsen in RA patients. Pain and swelling of the ankle contribute more to disability than radiographic damage of the foot and ankle.
authors: Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Almelo & Hengelo, The Netherlands. h.baan@a1.nl
authors: Henriëtte
authors: H
authors: Baan
authors: Wiepke
authors: W
authors: Drossaers-Bakker
authors: Rosemary
authors: R
authors: Dubbeldam
authors: Mart
authors: M
authors: van de Laar
references: Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Sep;52(9):2616-24
references: 16142762
references: Scand J Rheumatol. 2006 May-Jun;35(3):175-81
references: 16766363
references: Gait Posture. 2008 Nov;28(4):574-80
references: 18508270
references: Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Aug;35(8):755-60
references: 8761188
references: Joint Bone Spine. 2001 Mar;68(2):154-7
references: 11324931
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):561-70
references: 2037861
references: J Rheumatol. 1987 Oct;14(5):887-92
references: 3430519
references: Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr;48(4):955-62
references: 12687537
references: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Sep;44(9):1181-5
references: 15972357
references: Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Nov;15(11):608-13
references: 7849976
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):65-9
references: 19155234
references: Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1977 Jul;18(4):481-91
references: 920239
references: Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan;38(1):44-8
references: 7818570
references: Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Sep;43(9):1927-40
references: 11014342
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Oct;60(10):924-7
references: 11557647
references: Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Mar-Apr;25(2):275-80
references: 17543153
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 May;65(5):637-41
references: 16219709
references: J Rheumatol. 1998 Sep;25(9):1681-6
references: 9733446
references: J Rheumatol. 2002 May;29(5):1023-8
references: 12022318
references: J Rheumatol. 1999 Mar;26(3):743-5
references: 10090194
references: J Rheumatol. 2002 Feb;29(2):267-70
references: 11842821
references: J Rheumatol. 2006 Feb;33(2):228-33
references: 16465652
references: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jul;50(7):1320-30
references: 21371999
references: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Sep;39(9):998-1003
references: 10986305
references: Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Aug;36(8):855-60
references: 9291854
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jan;66(1):132-3
references: 17178759
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Apr;70(4):611-5
references: 21242235