title: Scene context influences without scene gist: eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search.
abstract: Although the use of semantic information about the world seems ubiquitous in every task we perform, it is not clear whether we rely on a scene's semantic information to guide attention when searching for something in a specific scene context (e.g., keys in one's living room). To address this question, we compared contribution of a scene's semantic information (i.e., scene gist) versus learned spatial associations between objects and context. Using the flash-preview-moving-window paradigm Castelhano and Henderson (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33:753-763, 2007), participants searched for target objects that were placed in either consistent or inconsistent locations and were semantically consistent or inconsistent with the scene gist. The results showed that learned spatial associations were used to guide search even in inconsistent contexts, providing evidence that scene context can affect search performance without consistent scene gist information. We discuss the results in terms of hierarchical organization of top-down influences of scene context.
authors: Department of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch St., Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. monica.castelhano@queensu.ca
authors: Monica S
authors: MS
authors: Castelhano
authors: Chelsea
authors: C
authors: Heaven
references: Percept Psychophys. 2004 Apr;66(3):454-63
references: 15283070
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):753-63
references: 17683226
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):795-801
references: 18792506
references: Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):341-9
references: 19777275
references: Cereb Cortex. 2010 Feb;20(2):294-303
references: 19457939
references: Neuron. 2003 Mar 6;37(5):865-76
references: 12628176
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1979 Sep;108(3):316-55
references: 528908
references: Q J Exp Psychol B. 2003 Feb;56(1):102-13
references: 12623541
references: Vis cogn. 2009 Aug 1;17(6-7):979-1003
references: 21052485
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1283-97
references: 20601710
references: Vis cogn. 2009 Aug 1;17(6-7):945-978
references: 20011676
references: Vision Res. 2006 Mar;46(5):614-21
references: 16236336
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):816-28
references: 17683230
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:243-71
references: 10074679
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):660-75
references: 18505330
references: Can J Psychol. 1992 Sep;46(3):319-41
references: 1486550
references: Can J Psychol. 1992 Sep;46(3):342-76
references: 1486551
references: Nature. 1998 Apr 9;392(6676):598-601
references: 9560155
references: Cogn Psychol. 1982 Apr;14(2):143-77
references: 7083801
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29
references: 15263892
references: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jul;17(7):1493-503
references: 16990438
references: J Vis. 2009 Oct 06;9(11):8.1-13
references: 20053071
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Dec;11(12):520-7
references: 18024143
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jul;10(4):445-63
references: 9712675