title: Budgeting for PACS.
abstract: There are a number of models for the acquisition of digital image management systems. The specific details for development of a budget for a PACS/RIS acquisition will depend upon the acquisition model - although there are similarities in the overarching principles and general information, particularly concerning the radiology service requirements that will drive budget considerations.While budgeting for PACS/RIS should follow the same principles as budgeting for any new technology, it is important to understand how far the implementation of digital image management systems can reach in a healthcare setting. Accurate identification of those elements of the healthcare service that will be affected by a PACS/RIS implementation is a critical component of successful budget formation and of the success of any business case and subsequent project that relies on those budget estimates.A budget for a PACS/RIS capital acquisition project should contain capital and recurrent elements. The capital is associated with the acquisition of the system in a purchase model and capital budget may also be required for upgrade - depending upon a facility's financial management processes.The recurrent (or operational) cost component for the PACS/RIS is associated with maintaining the system(s) in a sustainable operational state.It is also important to consider the service efficiencies, cost savings and service quality improvements that PACS/RIS can generate and include these factors into the economic analysis of any proposal for a PACS/RIS project.
authors: PACS Support Unit, Department of Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
authors: Lh
authors: L
authors: Sim
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Apr;2(4):327-37
references: 17411826
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Feb;4(2):92-6
references: 17412238
references: Semin Roentgenol. 2003 Jul;38(3):244-55
references: 14513728
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Jun;3(6):456-67
references: 17412101
references: J Digit Imaging. 2002 Sep;15(3):132-40
references: 12481227
references: Br J Radiol. 2005 Jun;78(930):480-2
references: 15900051
references: J Digit Imaging. 2007 Jun;20(2):99-104
references: 17505868
references: Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2008 Jun 10;5:8
references: 18563205
references: Emerg Radiol. 2003 Dec;10(3):115-8
references: 15290497
references: Semin Roentgenol. 2003 Jul;38(3):256-69
references: 14513729
references: J Digit Imaging. 1999 May;12(2 Suppl 1):50-3
references: 10342165
references: Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2007 Jun;30(2):101-4
references: 17682398
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Feb;5(2):144-5
references: 18242532
references: J Digit Imaging. 2002 Sep;15(3):153-60
references: 12415466
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Jun;4(6):416-8
references: 17544144
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jul;179(1):33-7
references: 12076899