title: Community interactions govern host-switching with implications for host-parasite coevolutionary history.
abstract: Reciprocal selective effects between coevolving species are often influenced by interactions with the broader ecological community. Community-level interactions may also influence macroevolutionary patterns of coevolution, such as cospeciation, but this hypothesis has received little attention. We studied two groups of ecologically similar feather lice (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) that differ in their patterns of association with a single group of hosts. The two groups, "body lice" and "wing lice," are both parasites of pigeons and doves (Columbiformes). Body lice are more host-specific and show greater population genetic structure than wing lice. The macroevolutionary history of body lice also parallels that of their columbiform hosts more closely than does the evolutionary history of wing lice. The closer association of body lice with hosts, compared with wing lice, can be explained if body lice are less capable of switching hosts than wing lice. Wing lice sometimes disperse phoretically on parasitic flies (Diptera: Hippoboscidae), but body lice seldom engage in this behavior. We tested the hypothesis that wing lice switch host species more often than body lice, and that the difference is governed by phoresis. Our results show that, where flies are present, wing lice switch to novel host species in sufficient numbers to establish viable populations on the new host. Body lice do not switch hosts, even where flies are present. Thus, differences in the coevolutionary history of wing and body lice can be explained by differences in host-switching, mediated by a member of the broader parasite community.
authors: Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. charbison@siena.edu
authors: Christopher W
authors: CW
authors: Harbison
authors: Dale H
authors: DH
authors: Clayton
references: Oecologia. 2001 Jun;128(1):99-106
references: 28547096
references: Am Nat. 2007 Apr;169(4):455-65
references: 17273981
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1133:87-125
references: 18559817
references: Am Nat. 2003 Aug;162(2):182-94
references: 12858263
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jun;23(6):311-7
references: 18439707
references: J Med Entomol. 1988 Jan;25(1):32-8
references: 3357173
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 7;277(1692):2321-30
references: 20356888
references: J Parasitol. 1971 Dec;57(6):1379-80
references: 5157178
references: Am Nat. 1999 Sep;154(3):261-270
references: 10506542
references: Syst Biol. 2004 Feb;53(1):165-73
references: 14965911
references: Evolution. 2003 Oct;57(10):2335-41
references: 14628921
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 22;272(1565):811-7
references: 15888414
references: J Parasitol. 2001 Dec;87(6):1291-300
references: 11780812
references: J Parasitol. 2009 Apr;95(2):295-307
references: 18821823
references: Mol Ecol. 2007 Jan;16(1):217-29
references: 17181733
references: Mol Ecol. 2002 Jan;11(1):25-38
references: 11903902
references: Environ Entomol. 2009 Feb;38(1):78-92
references: 19791600
references: Evolution. 2001 Feb;55(2):282-94
references: 11308086
references: J Wildl Dis. 1975 Jan;11(1):130-5
references: 803576
references: Avian Pathol. 1999 Apr;28(2):119-24
references: 26911497
references: Ecology. 2008 Nov;89(11):3186-3194
references: 31766819
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Oct;73(20):6660-8
references: 17766458
references: Science. 2003 Jan 17;299(5605):386-8
references: 12532015
references: New Phytol. 2005 Jan;165(1):81-89
references: 15720623
references: Int J Parasitol. 2004 Sep;34(10):1113-9
references: 15380682
references: Evolution. 2006 Oct;60(10):2158-67
references: 17133872
references: Int J Parasitol. 2009 Apr;39(5):569-75
references: 19038259
references: Angew Parasitol. 1989 Feb;30(1):43-6
references: 2729647
references: Parasite. 2005 Sep;12(3):277-9
references: 16218217
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 May;22(5):250-7
references: 17296244