title: A gall-inducing arthropod drives declines in canopy tree photosynthesis.
abstract: Mature forest canopies sustain an enormous diversity of herbivorous arthropods; however, with the exception of species that exhibit large-scale outbreaks, canopy arthropods are thought to have relatively little influence on overall forest productivity. Diminutive gall-inducing mites (Acari; Eriophyoidae) are ubiquitous in forest canopies and are almost always highly host specific, but despite their pervasive occurrence, the impacts of these obligate parasites on canopy physiology have not been examined. We have documented large declines in photosynthetic capacity (approx. 60%) and stomatal conductance (approx. 50%) in canopy leaves of mature sugar maple (Acer saccharum) trees frequently galled by the maple spindle gall mite Vasates aceriscrumena. Remarkably, such large impacts occurred at very low levels of galling, with the presence of only a few galls (occupying approx. 1% of leaf area) compromising gas-exchange across the entire leaf. In contrast to these extreme impacts on the leaves of adult trees, galls had no detectible effect on the gas-exchange of maple saplings, implying large ontogenetic differences in host tolerance to mite galling. We also found a significant negative correlation between canopy tree radial increment growth and levels of mite galling. Increased galling levels and higher physiological susceptibility in older canopy trees thus suggest that gall-inducing mites may be major drivers of "age-dependent" reductions in the physiological performance and growth of older trees.
authors: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. rajit.patankar@utoronto.ca
authors: Rajit
authors: R
authors: Patankar
authors: Sean C
authors: SC
authors: Thomas
authors: Sandy M
authors: SM
authors: Smith
references: Nature. 2009 Feb 19;457(7232):1003-6
references: 19225523
references: Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Mar;29(3):367-81
references: 17080592
references: Oecologia. 1998 Jun;115(1-2):161-166
references: 28308447
references: Tree Physiol. 2002 Feb;22(2-3):117-27
references: 11830408
references: Oecologia. 1993 Feb;93(1):114-120
references: 28313783
references: Tree Physiol. 2010 May;30(5):555-73
references: 20335160
references: Oecologia. 1997 Feb;109(4):575-582
references: 28307342
references: Oecologia. 1998 Feb;113(4):492-501
references: 28308028
references: Oecologia. 2006 Aug;149(2):221-32
references: 16758220
references: Ecology. 2007 Nov;88(11):2868-79
references: 18051656
references: Nature. 2008 Sep 11;455(7210):213-5
references: 18784722
references: Oecologia. 1991 Sep;88(1):15-21
references: 28312726
references: Nature. 2008 Apr 24;452(7190):987-90
references: 18432244
references: Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7):1781-91
references: 16922327
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Aug;20(8):441-8
references: 16701415
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 22;99(2):1088-91
references: 11792866
references: Oecologia. 1990 Aug;84(1):122-125
references: 28312785