title: Hybridization morphology and dentin bond stability of self-etch primers with different ethanol/water ratios.
abstract: This study evaluated the influence of ethanol/water ratios on the bond strength to dentin of experimental two-step, self-etch adhesive systems. Self-etch primers were prepared with constant 40 mass % of solvents. The ethanol/water ratios tested were 7:1 (P1), 3:1 (P2), and 1:1 (P3); primers with only ethanol (PE) or water (PW) as solvent were also tested. The bond strength to the dentin was investigated through a microtensile bond strength test. Resin-dentin beam-shaped specimens were obtained and tested after 24 h, 6 months, and 1 year of storage in water at 37°C. The hybridization morphology was analyzed using SEM. For bond strength at 24 h, PE = P1, P1 = P2, and P2, P3 and PW > PE. After 6 months, PE = P1 < P2, P3 and PW. After 1 year, no significant differences among the materials were detected. No significant differences among the periods were detected for PE. For P1, 24 h > 6 months = 1 year. For P2, P3 and PW, 24 h = 6 months > 1 year. For PE and P1, adhesive failures were predominant at 24 h, mixed or adhesive failures after 6 months, and premature debonding was predominant after 1 year. For P2, mixed failures were predominant at 24 h and 6 months, and premature debonding after 1 year. For P3 and PW, mixed failures were predominant at all storage periods. The SEM analysis revealed no clear differences in the hybridization patterns yielded by the water-based primers; PE showed formation of irregular resin tags.
authors: School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
authors: Silvia T
authors: ST
authors: Fontes
authors: Giana S
authors: GS
authors: Lima
authors: Fabrício A
authors: FA
authors: Ogliari
authors: Evandro
authors: E
authors: Piva
authors: Rafael R
authors: RR
authors: Moraes
references: J Adhes Dent. 2008 Jun;10(3):167-72
references: 18652264
references: J Dent. 2011 Jan;39(1):30-9
references: 20933048
references: J Can Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;69(11):726-31
references: 14653938
references: J Dent. 2008 Jun;36(6):402-8
references: 18378058
references: Dent Mater. 1998 Jan;14(1):6-10
references: 9972145
references: Biomaterials. 2005 Dec;26(34):6863-72
references: 15964621
references: J Dent. 2008 Aug;36(8):606-10
references: 18501495
references: J Dent. 2008 Mar;36(3):171-7
references: 18243472
references: Biomaterials. 2007 Sep;28(26):3757-85
references: 17543382
references: Dent Mater. 2008 Oct;24(10):1412-9
references: 18433860
references: Dent Mater J. 2006 Sep;25(3):545-52
references: 17076326
references: J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):118-32
references: 15668328
references: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Sep 15;82(4):975-83
references: 17335029
references: Odontology. 2010 Jul;98(2):117-25
references: 20652789
references: Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):215-35
references: 12760693
references: Eur J Dent. 2009 Oct;3(4):290-6
references: 19826601
references: J Dent. 2008 Feb;36(2):163-9
references: 18248872
references: Braz Oral Res. 2005 Oct-Dec;19(4):278-83
references: 16491256
references: Dent Mater. 2008 Jan;24(1):90-101
references: 17442386
references: J Dent Res. 2005 Jul;84(7):653-8
references: 15972596
references: Dent Mater. 1995 Mar;11(2):132-6
references: 8621034