title: Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.
abstract: We investigated the relationship between noise equivalent count (NEC) and axial field of view (AFOV) for PET scanners with AFOVs ranging from one-half to twice those of current clinical scanners. PET scanners with longer or shorter AFOVs could fulfill different clinical needs depending on exam volumes and site economics. Using previously validated Monte Carlo simulations, we modeled true, scattered and random coincidence counting rates for a PET ring diameter of 88 cm with 2, 4, 6, and 8 rings of detector blocks (AFOV 7.8, 15.5, 23.3, and 31.0 cm). Fully 3D acquisition mode was compared to full collimation (2D) and partial collimation (2.5D) modes. Counting rates were estimated for a 200 cm long version of the 20 cm diameter NEMA count-rate phantom and for an anthropomorphic object based on a patient scan. We estimated the live-time characteristics of the scanner from measured count-rate data and applied that estimate to the simulated results to obtain NEC as a function of object activity. We found NEC increased as a quadratic function of AFOV for 3D mode, and linearly in 2D mode. Partial collimation provided the highest overall NEC on the 2-block system and fully 3D mode provided the highest NEC on the 8-block system for clinically relevant activities. On the 4-, and 6-block systems 3D mode NEC was highest up to ∼300 MBq in the anthropomorphic phantom, above which 3D NEC dropped rapidly, and 2.5D NEC was highest. Projected total scan time to achieve NEC-density that matches current clinical practice in a typical oncology exam averaged 9, 15, 24, and 61 min for the 8-, 6-, 4-, and 2-block ring systems, when using optimal collimation. Increasing the AFOV should provide a greater than proportional increase in NEC, potentially benefiting patient throughput-to-cost ratio. Conversely, by using appropriate collimation, a two-ring (7.8 cm AFOV) system could acquire whole-body scans achieving NEC-density levels comparable to current standards within long, but feasible, scan times.
authors: University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. macdon@uw.edu
authors: L R
authors: LR
authors: MacDonald
authors: R L
authors: RL
authors: Harrison
authors: A M
authors: AM
authors: Alessio
authors: W C J
authors: WC
authors: Hunter
authors: T K
authors: TK
authors: Lewellen
authors: P E
authors: PE
authors: Kinahan
references: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jul 21;53(14):3723-38
references: 18574308
references: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2008 Jun;55(3):975-983
references: 19096731
references: IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997). 2007;4:2880-2884
references: 19209237
references: J Nucl Med. 2005 Nov;46(11):1825-34
references: 16269596
references: IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997). 2009 Oct 24;2009:3900-3903
references: 20729989
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007 Jul;26(7):935-44
references: 17649907
references: Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jul 7;51(13):R117-37
references: 16790899