title: Is surface-based orientation influenced by a proportional relationship of shape parameters?
abstract: We investigated the extent to which parameters of environmental shape - namely the major and minor principal axes of space which pass through the centroid and approximate length and width of the entire space, respectively, were subject to similar psychophysical principles as those involved in distance discriminations. We developed an orientation task that allowed us to manipulate the ratio of the major to the minor principal axes of an enclosure during training and control for orientation by alternative cues other than principal axes such as wall lengths or corner angles during testing. Participants trained in an environment with a larger hypothetical discriminability ratio allocated more responses to locations specified by the principal axes of space across novel enclosure types compared to a group trained with a smaller hypothetical discriminability ratio. Results suggest that psychophysical principles may operate on the discrimination of environmental shape parameters and delineate a potential mechanism for experiential and developmental changes in orientation ability.
authors: Department of Psychology, Armstrong Atlantic State University, 229 Science Center, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA 31419, USA. bradley.sturz@armstrong.edu
authors: Bradley R
authors: BR
authors: Sturz
authors: Kent D
authors: KD
authors: Bodily
references: Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1301-7
references: 19121141
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jul;33(3):191-212
references: 17620021
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Oct;27(4):417-22
references: 11676090
references: Cognition. 2005 Sep;97(2):121-33
references: 16226559
references: J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:994-1002
references: 14084171
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):569-73
references: 17614863
references: Anim Cogn. 2007 Jan;10(1):47-54
references: 16794851
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Apr;37(2):246-53
references: 21319918
references: Cogn Psychol. 2001 Dec;43(4):274-310
references: 11741344
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Apr;31(2):254-9; discussion 260-1
references: 15839781
references: Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):616-21
references: 16866748
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):1-23
references: 15945200
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1988 Apr;162(6):815-26
references: 3397923
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):355-61
references: 18684662
references: Dev Sci. 2005 Sep;8(5):393-401
references: 16048511
references: Behav Processes. 2009 Mar;80(3):306-13
references: 20522319
references: J Comp Neurol. 1980 May 1;191(1):1-51
references: 6772696
references: Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):223-7
references: 19576273
references: Nature. 1994 Jul 7;370(6484):57-9
references: 8015605
references: Cognition. 2010 Feb;114(2):207-26
references: 19796761