title: The clinical burden of malaria in Nairobi: a historical review and contemporary audit.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Widespread urbanization over the next 20 years has the potential to drastically change the risk of malaria within Africa. The burden of the disease, its management, risk factors and appropriateness of targeted intervention across varied urban environments in Africa remain largely undefined. This paper presents a combined historical and contemporary review of the clinical burden of malaria within one of Africa's largest urban settlements, Nairobi, Kenya.
  
  
  METHODS
  A review of historical reported malaria case burdens since 1911 within Nairobi was undertaken using archived government and city council reports. Contemporary information on out-patient case burdens due to malaria were assembled from the National Health Management and Information System (HMIS). Finally, an audit of 22 randomly selected health facilities within Nairobi was undertaken covering 12 months 2009-2010. The audit included interviews with health workers, and a checklist of commodities and guidelines necessary to diagnose, treat and record malaria.
  
  
  RESULTS
  From the 1930's through to the mid-1960's malaria incidence declined coincidental with rapid population growth. During this period malaria notification and prevention were a priority for the city council. From 2001-2008 reporting systems for malaria were inadequate to define the extent or distribution of malaria risk within Nairobi. A more detailed facility review suggests, however that malaria remains a common diagnosis (11% of all paediatric diagnoses made) and where laboratories (n = 15) exist slide positivity rates are on average 15%. Information on the quality of diagnosis, slide reading and whether those reported as positive were imported infections was not established. The facilities and health workers included in this study were not universally prepared to treat malaria according to national guidelines or identify foci of risks due to shortages of national first-line drugs, inadequate record keeping and a view among some health workers (17%) that slide negative patients could still have malaria.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Combined with historical evidence there is a strong suggestion that very low risks of locally acquired malaria exist today within Nairobi's city limits and this requires further investigation. To be prepared for effective prevention and case-management of malaria among a diverse, mobile population in Nairobi requires a major paradigm shift and investment in improved quality of malaria diagnosis and case management, health system strengthening and case reporting.
authors: Malaria Public Health & Epidemiology Group, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research - Coast, Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 43640, 00100 GPO Nairobi, Kenya.
authors: Sandra A
authors: SA
authors: Mudhune
authors: Emelda A
authors: EA
authors: Okiro
authors: Abdisalan M
authors: AM
authors: Noor
authors: Dejan
authors: D
authors: Zurovac
authors: Elizabeth
authors: E
authors: Juma
authors: Sam A
authors: SA
authors: Ochola
authors: Robert W
authors: RW
authors: Snow
references: Malar J. 2007 May 26;6:71
references: 17531102
references: Malar J. 2010 Oct 30;9:306
references: 21034492
references: East Afr Med J. 1947 Mar;24(3):112-26
references: 20240998
references: Malar J. 2006 Apr 04;5:28
references: 16584575
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Aug;71(2 Suppl):118-27
references: 15331827
references: Malar J. 2011 Jan 07;10:1
references: 21214892
references: Acta Trop. 2005 Jan;93(1):11-21
references: 15589793
references: PLoS Med. 2006 Jun;3(6):e271
references: 16719557
references: Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Mar;10(3):240-5
references: 15730508
references: BMC Med. 2009 Dec 09;7:75
references: 20003178
references: Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Mar 06;8:13
references: 19267903
references: Med Trop (Mars). 2006 Apr;66(2):143-8
references: 16775937
references: Malar J. 2006 Jun 02;5:45
references: 16749927
references: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Jan;3(1):81-90
references: 15608702
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Apr;80(4):547-54
references: 19346373
references: J Vector Borne Dis. 2009 Dec;46(4):273-9
references: 19959853
references: Malar J. 2010 Mar 04;9:69
references: 20202199
references: Malar J. 2005 Sep 09;4:40
references: 16153298
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Aug;71(2 Suppl):97-102
references: 15331825
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Mar;80(3):487-91
references: 19270303
references: East Afr Med J. 1984 Apr;61(4):303-5
references: 6489233
references: Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):710-5
references: 11832960
references: PLoS Med. 2009 Jan 6;6(1):e252
references: 19127974
references: Malar J. 2005 Feb 18;4:12
references: 15720713
references: Malar J. 2009 Apr 08;8:57
references: 19356246
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Mar;68(3):357-65
references: 12685645
references: BMJ. 2004 Nov 20;329(7476):1212
references: 15542534
references: Malar J. 2006 Apr 04;5:29
references: 16584573
references: Geospat Health. 2009 May;3(2):189-210
references: 19440962
references: Malar J. 2005 Sep 16;4:43
references: 16168054
references: Malar J. 2008 Aug 04;7:151
references: 18680565
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Feb;68(2):169-76
references: 12641407
references: East Afr Med J. 1971 Feb;48(2):51-5
references: 4932548
references: Malar J. 2009 Jul 15;8:160
references: 19604369
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;81 Suppl 2:19-25
references: 3455564