title: Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: a prospective study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In 1998, a new selection process which utilised an aptitude test and an interview in addition to previous academic achievement was introduced into an Australian undergraduate medical course.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To test the outcomes of the selection criteria over an 11-year period.
  
  
  METHODS
  1174 students who entered the course from secondary school and who enrolled in the MBBS from 1999 through 2009 were studied in relation to specific course outcomes. Regression analyses using entry scores, sex and age as independent variables were tested for their relative value in predicting subsequent academic performance in the 6-year course. The main outcome measures were assessed by weighted average mark for each academic year level; together with results in specific units, defined as either 'knowledge'-based or 'clinically' based.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Previous academic performance and female sex were the major independent positive predictors of performance in the course. The interview score showed positive predictive power during the latter years of the course and in a range of 'clinically' based units. This relationship was mediated predominantly by the score for communication skills.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Results support combining prior academic achievement with the assessment of communication skills in a structured interview as selection criteria into this undergraduate medical course.
authors: Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Australia. annette.mercer@uwa.edu.au
authors: Annette
authors: A
authors: Mercer
authors: Ian B
authors: IB
authors: Puddey
references: Singapore Med J. 1998 Dec;39(12):537-42
references: 10067397
references: Med J Aust. 2010 Sep 6;193(5):277-80
references: 20819046
references: BMJ. 2005 Sep 10;331(7516):555-9
references: 16150766
references: JAMA. 2002 Sep 4;288(9):1085-90
references: 12204076
references: BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1156
references: 16690689
references: BMJ. 2003 Jul 19;327(7407):139-42
references: 12869457
references: Med J Aust. 2008 Mar 17;188(6):349-54
references: 18341459
references: BMJ. 2005 Sep 10;331(7516):559-60
references: 16150767
references: J R Soc Med. 2002 Jan;95(1):18-22
references: 11773346
references: Acad Med. 2001 Dec;76(12):1207-12
references: 11739042
references: Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):360-7
references: 19335578
references: Med Teach. 2003 May;25(3):302-7
references: 12881055
references: Intern Med J. 2005 Mar;35(3):174-7
references: 15737138
references: Med Educ. 2009 Dec;43(12):1203-9
references: 19930512
references: Med J Aust. 2008 Mar 17;188(6):323-4
references: 18341451
references: Intern Med J. 2005 Nov;35(11):647-9
references: 16248857
references: BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):952-7
references: 11964342
references: Ir Med J. 2003 Feb;96(2):38-41
references: 12674150
references: Med Educ. 2007 Mar;41(3):234-41
references: 17316207
references: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9(2):79-82
references: 15222333
references: Med Educ. 2007 Jan;41(1):57-64
references: 17209893