title: Comprehensive CT Evaluation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Impact on Diagnosis and Treatment Decisions.
abstract: Background. With modern CT imaging a comprehensive overview of cerebral macro- and microcirculation can be obtained within minutes in acute ischemic stroke. This opens for patient stratification and individualized treatment. Methods. Four patients with acute ischemic stroke of different aetiologies and/or treatments were chosen for illustration of the comprehensive CT protocol and its value in subsequent treatment decisions. The patients were clinically evaluated according to the NIHSS-scale, examined with the comprehensive CT protocol including both CT angiography and CT perfusion, and followed up by MRI. Results. The comprehensive CT examination protocol increased the examination time but did not delay treatment initiation. In some cases CT angiography revealed the cause of stroke while CT perfusion located and graded the perfusion defect with reasonable accuracy, confirmed by follow-up MR-diffusion. In the presented cases findings of the comprehensive CT examination influenced the treatment strategy. Conclusions. The comprehensive CT examination is a fast and safe method allowing accurate diagnosis and making way for individualized treatment in acute ischemic stroke.
authors: Department of Neuroradiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Getingevägen 4, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.
authors: Askell
authors: A
authors: Löve
authors: Roger
authors: R
authors: Siemund
authors: Gunnar
authors: G
authors: Andsberg
authors: Mats
authors: M
authors: Cronqvist
authors: Stig
authors: S
authors: Holtås
authors: Isabella
authors: I
authors: Björkman-Burtscher
references: JAMA. 1995 Oct 4;274(13):1017-25
references: 7563451
references: Neurology. 2007 Feb 27;68(9):694-7
references: 17325279
references: Radiology. 1999 Jan;210(1):155-62
references: 9885601
references: Lancet. 2004 Mar 6;363(9411):768-74
references: 15016487
references: Eur Radiol. 2001;11(7):1220-30
references: 11471616
references: Ann Neurol. 2000 Apr;47(4):462-9
references: 10762157
references: Lancet. 2008 Oct 11;372(9646):1303-9
references: 18790527
references: Stroke. 2007 Jul;38(7):2127-35
references: 17525387
references: JAMA. 1999 Dec 1;282(21):2019-26
references: 10591384
references: Stroke. 2006 Apr;37(4):979-85
references: 16514093
references: Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):263-6
references: 16339467
references: JAMA. 1999 Dec 1;282(21):2003-11
references: 10591382
references: Stroke. 1998 Jan;29(1):4-11
references: 9445320
references: Stroke. 2002 Aug;33(8):2025-31
references: 12154257
references: Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(5):457-507
references: 18477843
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Sep;27(8):1741-5
references: 16971627
references: N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 14;333(24):1581-7
references: 7477192
references: Stroke. 2007 Mar;38(3):967-73
references: 17272772
references: Radiology. 2002 Aug;224(2):353-60
references: 12147827
references: Br J Radiol. 2009 Jul;82(979):561-70
references: 19221186
references: Stroke. 1989 Jul;20(7):864-70
references: 2749846
references: Stroke. 2004 Jul;35(7):1652-8
references: 15155964
references: Stroke. 2007 May;38(5):1655-711
references: 17431204
references: Lancet. 1998 Oct 17;352(9136):1245-51
references: 9788453
references: Stroke. 2004 Apr;35(4):904-11
references: 15017018
references: Stroke. 1999 Dec;30(12):2598-605
references: 10582984
references: N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 25;359(13):1317-29
references: 18815396