title: Sparse low-order interaction network underlies a highly correlated and learnable neural population code.
abstract: Information is carried in the brain by the joint activity patterns of large groups of neurons. Understanding the structure and function of population neural codes is challenging because of the exponential number of possible activity patterns and dependencies among neurons. We report here that for groups of ~100 retinal neurons responding to natural stimuli, pairwise-based models, which were highly accurate for small networks, are no longer sufficient. We show that because of the sparse nature of the neural code, the higher-order interactions can be easily learned using a novel model and that a very sparse low-order interaction network underlies the code of large populations of neurons. Additionally, we show that the interaction network is organized in a hierarchical and modular manner, which hints at scalability. Our results suggest that learnability may be a key feature of the neural code.
authors: Department of Neurobiology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
authors: Elad
authors: E
authors: Ganmor
authors: Ronen
authors: R
authors: Segev
authors: Elad
authors: E
authors: Schneidman
references: Neural Comput. 2006 Jul;18(7):1527-54
references: 16764513
references: Nature. 2010 Jul 29;466(7306):617-21
references: 20601940
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 9;28(2):505-18
references: 18184793
references: Nature. 2003 Jul 31;424(6948):552-6
references: 12891358
references: Nature. 1997 Nov 6;390(6655):70-4
references: 9363891
references: Trends Neurosci. 2004 Apr;27(4):225-30
references: 15046882
references: Neuron. 2006 Aug 3;51(3):359-68
references: 16880130
references: Science. 1997 Dec 12;278(5345):1950-3
references: 9395398
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Aug;14(4):481-7
references: 15321069
references: J Neurosci. 2003 Dec 17;23(37):11539-53
references: 14684857
references: Nat Neurosci. 1998 Oct;1(6):501-7
references: 10196548
references: Science. 1993 Mar 26;259(5103):1915-7
references: 8456317
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 15;29(15):5022-31
references: 19369571
references: J Neurosci. 1998 Sep 15;18(18):7411-25
references: 9736661
references: J Neurosci. 2001 Mar 1;21(5):1676-97
references: 11222658
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Apr 3;102(13):138101
references: 19392405
references: Science. 1986 Sep 26;233(4771):1416-9
references: 3749885
references: Phys Rev Lett. 1987 Jan 12;58(2):86-88
references: 10034599
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Dec 5;91(23):238701
references: 14683220
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1193-216
references: 11520932
references: Network. 2001 Aug;12(3):241-53
references: 11563528
references: Neuron. 2003 Feb 6;37(3):499-511
references: 12575956
references: Nature. 2008 Jan 3;451(7174):61-4
references: 18094685
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 23;31(8):3044-54
references: 21414925
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 9;26(32):8254-66
references: 16899720
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 22;95(26):15706-11
references: 9861034
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):14058-62
references: 19666487
references: Nature. 2006 Apr 20;440(7087):1007-12
references: 16625187
references: Nature. 2008 Aug 21;454(7207):995-9
references: 18650810
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Apr 27;25(17):4207-16
references: 15858046
references: Science. 1986 Aug 8;233(4764):625-33
references: 3755256
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 30;30(26):8720-33
references: 20592194
references: Neuron. 2005 May 5;46(3):493-504
references: 15882648
references: Neural Comput. 2000 Nov;12(11):2621-53
references: 11110130
references: Science. 1994 May 13;264(5161):974-7
references: 8178157