title: Pitfalls in the statistical examination and interpretation of the correspondence between physician and patient satisfaction ratings and their relevance for shared decision making research.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The correspondence of satisfaction ratings between physicians and patients can be assessed on different dimensions. One may examine whether they differ between the two groups or focus on measures of association or agreement. The aim of our study was to evaluate methodological difficulties in calculating the correspondence between patient and physician satisfaction ratings and to show the relevance for shared decision making research.
  
  
  METHODS
  We utilised a structured tool for cardiovascular prevention (arriba™) in a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial. Correspondence between patient and physician satisfaction ratings after individual primary care consultations was assessed using the Patient Participation Scale (PPS). We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the marginal homogeneity test, Kendall's tau-b, weighted kappa, percentage of agreement, and the Bland-Altman method to measure differences, associations, and agreement between physicians and patients.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Statistical measures signal large differences between patient and physician satisfaction ratings with more favourable ratings provided by patients and a low correspondence regardless of group allocation. Closer examination of the raw data revealed a high ceiling effect of satisfaction ratings and only slight disagreement regarding the distributions of differences between physicians' and patients' ratings.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Traditional statistical measures of association and agreement are not able to capture a clinically relevant appreciation of the physician-patient relationship by both parties in skewed satisfaction ratings. Only the Bland-Altman method for assessing agreement augmented by bar charts of differences was able to indicate this.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ISRCTN: ISRCT71348772.
authors: Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany. oliver.hirsch@staff.uni-marburg.de
authors: Oliver
authors: O
authors: Hirsch
authors: Heidemarie
authors: H
authors: Keller
authors: Christina
authors: C
authors: Albohn-Kühne
authors: Tanja
authors: T
authors: Krones
authors: Norbert
authors: N
authors: Donner-Banzhoff
references: Br J Sports Med. 2001 Aug;35(4):263-7
references: 11477024
references: Clin Rehabil. 2003 Aug;17(5):548-52
references: 12952162
references: Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):218-27
references: 18474884
references: Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;43(2):215-23
references: 14747811
references: Acta Orthop. 2005 Dec;76(6):796-802
references: 16470432
references: BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1200
references: 8916759
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr 16;9:63
references: 19371417
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Feb 08;10:13
references: 19200400
references: JAMA. 1999 Aug 25;282(8):737-43
references: 10463708
references: Fam Pract. 2009 Oct;26(5):384-90
references: 19584122
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD001431
references: 19588325
references: Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(4):259-67
references: 17601182
references: Eur Spine J. 2011 Dec;20(12):2115-9
references: 21479853
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9
references: 2348207
references: Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
references: 2868172
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551-8
references: 2189948
references: Eval Health Prof. 2010 Sep;33(3):321-42
references: 20801975
references: Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(6):637-44
references: 3067359
references: Eval Health Prof. 2009 Jun;32(2):128-43
references: 19448159
references: Med Care. 2007 Jan;45(1):88-94
references: 17279025
references: Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1085-7
references: 7564793
references: J Clin Pathol. 2004 Jul;57(7):783
references: 15220382
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):79-86
references: 17942270
references: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Dec;15(5):625-32
references: 20146096
references: Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(4):409-13
references: 16964357
references: Med Educ. 2008 Dec;42(12):1150-2
references: 19120943
references: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;22(1):85-93
references: 12858311
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;49(4):431-4
references: 8621993
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):743-8
references: 15129398
references: Am J Med. 1995 Dec;99(6):590-6
references: 7503079
references: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007 Oct 15;7:30
references: 17937801
references: Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60
references: 10501650
references: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2004 Jan-Feb;31(1-2):113-5
references: 14756695
references: Acad Radiol. 2008 Oct;15(10):1322-30
references: 18790405
references: Clin J Pain. 2010 Feb;26(2):144-52
references: 20090442
references: Br J Psychiatry. 1970 Jun;116(535):651-5
references: 5452368
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Sep;46(9):1055-62
references: 8263578
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Nov;19(11):1088-95
references: 15566437
references: Fam Pract. 2007 Oct;24(5):498-503
references: 17656632
references: Int J Biomed Comput. 1993 Jul;33(1):55-64
references: 8349359
references: Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;24(3):139-46
references: 15912064
references: Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Sep 21;8:104
references: 20858248
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;63(2):180-4
references: 19716265
references: Med Educ. 2004 Dec;38(12):1217-8
references: 15566531
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):215-6
references: 15718108