title: Automatic polyp detection and measurement with computed tomographic colonography: A phantom study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) software in detecting and measuring polyps for CT Colonography, based on an in vitro phantom study.
  
  
  METHODS
  A colon phantom was constructed with a PVC pipe of 3.8 cm diameter. Nine simulated polyps of various sizes (3.2mm-25.4mm) were affixed inside the phantom that was placed in a water bath. The phantom was scanned on a 64-slice CT scanner with tube voltage of 120 kV and current of 205 mAs. Two separate scans were performed, with different slice thickness and reconstruction interval. The first scan (thin) had a slice thickness of 1mm and reconstruction interval 0.5mm. The second scan (thick) had a slice thickness of 2mm and reconstruction interval of 1mm. Images from both scans were processed using CT Colonography software that automatically segments the colon phantom and applies CAD that automatically highlights and provides the size (maximum and minimum diameters, volume) of each polyp. Two readers independently measured each polyp (two orthogonal diameters) using both 2D and 3D views. Readers' manual measurements (diameters) and automatic measurements from CAD (diameters and volume) were compared to actual polyp sizes as measured by mechanical calipers.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All polyps except the smallest (3.2mm) were detected by CAD. CAD achieved 100% sensitivity in detecting polyps ≥6mm. Mean errors in CAD automated volume measurements for thin and thick slice scans were 8.7% and 6.8%, respectively. Almost all CAD and manual readers' 3D measurements overestimated the size of polyps to variable extent. Both over- and underestimation of polyp sizes were observed in the readers' manual 2D measurements. Overall, Reader 1 (expert) had smaller mean error than Reader 2 (non-expert).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  CAD provided accurate size measurements for all polyps, and results were comparable to the two readers' manual measurements.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Virmani
authors: As
authors: A
authors: Lev-Toaff
authors: Lm
authors: L
authors: Ciancibello
references: Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
references: 2868172
references: N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18;359(12):1207-17
references: 18799557
references: JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1713-9
references: 15082698
references: Gastroenterology. 2005 Dec;129(6):1832-44
references: 16344052
references: Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1690-9
references: 17087934
references: Lancet. 2005 Jan 22-28;365(9456):305-11
references: 15664225
references: N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2191-200
references: 14657426
references: Radiology. 2007 Oct;245(1):140-9
references: 17885187
references: Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):3-9
references: 15987959
references: N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 4;357(14):1403-12
references: 17914041
references: Eur Radiol. 2003 Jul;13(7):1657-63
references: 12835982
references: Acad Radiol. 2005 May;12(5):608-13
references: 15866134