title: Intraoperative conversion rate to a large, limbal opening in minimally invasive strabismus surgery (MISS).
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To evaluate which factors predispose to an intraoperative conversion to the usual limbal approach in minimally invasive strabismus surgery (MISS).
  
  
  METHODS
  This study included 451 consecutive patients operated on by one surgeon at Kantonsspital St Gallen, Switzerland, with minimally invasive rectus muscle surgery between February 2003 and December 2007. We evaluated the intraoperative conversion rate to the usual limbal approach over time, and performed a retrospective determination of date of surgery, age of patient, motility of the eye, primary or revision surgery, and the type and dose of surgery in 982 consecutive rectus muscle procedures.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In 3.6% (35/982) of MISS procedures, an intraoperative conversion to a large, limbal approach was necessary. The overall conversion rate decreased over time, from 8.4% in 2003 to 0.4% in 2007. The multivariate regression analysis showed a significant negative influence between the date of surgery and the conversion rate (p < 0.005). Muscle resections were associated with a higher conversion rate (p < 0.001). The other evaluated factors had no significant influence on an intraoperative enlargement of the conjunctival opening.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study confirms the reliability of the new MISS technique, and shows a low conversion rate to the usual limbal approach. The conversion rate decreased over time with increasing surgical experience. Muscle resections were associated with a higher conversion rate, while the age of the patient, the motility of the eye, revision surgery and the dose of surgery had no significant influence on an intraoperative conversion.
authors: Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
authors: Marion
authors: M
authors: Kaup
authors: Stefania M
authors: SM
authors: Mojon-Azzi
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Kunz
authors: Daniel S
authors: DS
authors: Mojon
references: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;247(3):319-24
references: 19034479
references: Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(4):236-42
references: 19940531
references: Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;91(1):76-82
references: 17179123
references: Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;92(12):1648-52
references: 18782805
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 1968 Jul;80(1):94-7
references: 5660023
references: Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;91(1):5
references: 17179120
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 1968 Jun;65(6):907-15
references: 4872139
references: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Feb;29(2):151-6
references: 9507260
references: Ophthalmology. 1990 Apr;97(4):456-61
references: 2326023
references: AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954 Jan;51(1):32-41
references: 13103883
references: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;247(2):261-5
references: 18958486
references: J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2010 Sep-Oct;47(5):292-6
references: 19873948
references: J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1980 Mar-Apr;17(2):106-7
references: 6993650
references: Eye (Lond). 2000 Apr;14 ( Pt 2):190-5
references: 10845015
references: Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;93(6):843-4
references: 19471011
references: Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(2):67-71
references: 19707029
references: Ophthalmologica. 2009;223(2):111-5
references: 19066435