title: Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To estimate abortion rates among subpopulations of women in 2008, assess changes in subpopulation abortion rates since 2000, and estimate the lifetime incidence of abortion.
  
  
  METHODS
  We combined secondary data from several sources, including the 2008 Abortion Patient Survey, the Current Population Surveys for 2008 and 2009, and the 2006-2008 National Survey of Family Growth, to estimate abortion rates by subgroup and lifetime incidence of abortion for U.S. women of reproductive age.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The abortion rate declined 8.0% between 2000 and 2008, from 21.3 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 to 19.6 per 1,000. Decreases in abortion were experienced by most subgroups of women. One notable exception was poor women; this group accounted for 42.4% of abortions in 2008, and their abortion rate increased 17.5% between 2000 and 2008 from 44.4 to 52.2 abortions per 1,000. In addition to poor women, abortion rates were highest for women who were cohabiting (52.0 per 1,000), aged 20-24 (39.9 per 1,000), or non-Hispanic African American (40.2 per 1,000). If the 2008 abortion rate prevails, 30.0% of women will have an abortion by age 45.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Abortion is becoming increasingly concentrated among poor women, and restrictions on abortion disproportionately affect this population.
authors: From the Guttmacher Institute, Research Division, New York, New York.
authors: Rachel K
authors: RK
authors: Jones
authors: Megan L
authors: ML
authors: Kavanaugh
references: Jones RK, Kooistra K. Abortion incidence and access to abortion services in the United States, 2008. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2011;43:41–50.
references: Owings MF, Kozak LJ. Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1996. Vital Health Statistics, 1998, Series 13, No. 139. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1998.
references: Jones RK, Zolna MR, Henshaw SK, Finer LB. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2008;40:6–16.
references: Jones RK, Darroch JE, Henshaw SK. Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000–2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002;34:226–35.
references: Henshaw SK, Silverman J. The characteristics and prior contraceptive use of U.S. abortion patients. Fam Plann Perspect 1988;20:158–68.
references: Henshaw SK, Kost K. Abortion patients in 1994–1995: characteristics and contraceptive use. Fam Plann Perspect 1996;28:140–7, 158.
references: Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:24–9, 46.
references: Jones RK, Finer LB, Singh S. Characteristics of U.S. abortion patients, 2008. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2010.
references: Pazol K, Zane S, Parker WY, Hall LR, Gamble SB, Hamdan S, et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Abortion surveillance - United States, 2007. MMWR Surveill Summ 2011;60:1–42.
references: Casper LM, Cohen PN. How does POSSLQ measure up? historical estimates of cohabitation. Demography 2000;37:237–45.
references: Forrest JD. Unintended pregnancy among American women. Fam Plann Perspect 1987;19:76–7.
references: Guttmacher Institute. A real-time look at the impact of the recession on women's family planning and pregnancy decisions. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2009.
references: DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2008. Current Population Reports (CPR) 2009. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office: 60-236
references: Kost K, Henshaw S, Carlin L. U.S. teenage pregnancies, births and abortions: national and state trends and trends by race and ethnicity, 2010. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2010.
references: Pazol K, Gamble SB, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Abortion surveillance - United States, 2006. MMWR Surveill Summ 2009;58:1–35.
references: Fu H, Darroch JE, Henshaw SK, Kolb E. Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:128–33, 138.
references: Jones RK, Kost K. Underreporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the United States: an analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Stud Fam Plann 2007;38:187–97.
references: Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006;38:90–6.
references: Kost K, Singh S, Vaughan B, Trussell J, Bankole A. Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception 2008;77:10–21.
references: Joffe CE. Dispatches from the abortion wars: the costs of fanaticism to doctors, patients, and the rest of us. Boston (MA): Beacon Press; 2010.
references: Kumar A, Hessini L, Mitchell EM. Conceptualising abortion stigma. Cult Health Sex 2009;11:625–39.