title: Effects of an evidence service on community-based AIDS service organizations' use of research evidence: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To support the use of research evidence by community-based organizations (CBOs) we have developed 'Synthesized HIV/AIDS Research Evidence' (SHARE), which is an evidence service for those working in the HIV sector. SHARE consists of several components: an online searchable database of HIV-relevant systematic reviews (retrievable based on a taxonomy of topics related to HIV/AIDS and open text search); periodic email updates; access to user-friendly summaries; and peer relevance assessments. Our objective is to evaluate whether this 'full serve' evidence service increases the use of research evidence by CBOs as compared to a 'self-serve' evidence service.
  
  
  METHODS
  We will conduct a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), along with a follow-up qualitative process study to explore the findings in greater depth. All CBOs affiliated with Canadian AIDS Society (n = 120) will be invited to participate and will be randomized to receive either the 'full-serve' version of SHARE or the 'self-serve' version (a listing of relevant systematic reviews with links to records on PubMed and worksheets that help CBOs find and use research evidence) using a simple randomized design. All management and staff from each organization will be provided access to the version of SHARE that their organization is allocated to. The trial duration will be 10 months (two-month baseline period, six-month intervention period, and two month crossover period), the primary outcome measure will be the mean number of logins/month/organization (averaged across the number of users from each organization) between baseline and the end of the intervention period. The secondary outcome will be intention to use research evidence as measured by a survey administered to one key decision maker from each organization. For the qualitative study, one key organizational decision maker from 15 organizations in each trial arm (n = 30) will be purposively sampled. One-on-one semi-structured interviews will be conducted by telephone on their views about and their experiences with the evidence service they received, how helpful it was in their work, why it was helpful (or not helpful), what aspects were most and least helpful and why, and recommendations for next steps.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  To our knowledge, this will be the first RCT to evaluate the effects of an evidence service specifically designed to support CBOs in finding and using research evidence.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01257724.
authors: McMaster Health Forum, Hamilton, Canada. wilsom2@mcmaster.ca.
authors: Michael G
authors: MG
authors: Wilson
authors: John N
authors: JN
authors: Lavis
authors: Jeremy M
authors: JM
authors: Grimshaw
authors: R Brian
authors: RB
authors: Haynes
authors: Tsegaye
authors: T
authors: Bekele
authors: Sean B
authors: SB
authors: Rourke
references: Implement Sci. 2010 Apr 27;5:33
references: 20423486
references: JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1801-8
references: 16622142
references: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:I1
references: 20018098
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Aug;84(8):620-8
references: 16917649
references: Res Nurs Health. 2000 Jun;23(3):246-55
references: 10871540
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):239-44
references: 12425783
references: Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):729-68
references: 18070335
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):593-600
references: 16929034
references: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(7):1889-99
references: 16843579
references: Br J Health Psychol. 2001 Nov;6(Part 4):347-360
references: 12614509
references: BMJ. 1998 Sep 26;317(7162):858-61
references: 9748183
references: BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):273-6
references: 9677226
references: J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24
references: 16557505
references: N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45
references: 12826639
references: Implement Sci. 2006 Nov 21;1:28
references: 17118180
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:35-48
references: 16053582
references: Implement Sci. 2007 Jul 03;2:20
references: 17608940
references: Implement Sci. 2011 May 27;6:51
references: 21619621
references: Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):517-63, 509
references: 9879302
references: Milbank Q. 2001;79(3):429-57, IV-V
references: 11565163
references: J Healthc Manag. 2007 Sep-Oct;52(5):325-41; discussion 341-2
references: 17933188
references: Med Care. 1994 Mar;32(3):202-13
references: 8145598
references: Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):670-6
references: 15520031
references: BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
references: 10625273
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jul;8(3):165-70
references: 12869343
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Jul;55(7):717-22
references: 12160920
references: Implement Sci. 2009 Apr 27;4:23
references: 19397820
references: Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 24;9:29
references: 21702956
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):107-12
references: 11900150
references: PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000141
references: 19936223
references: J Nurs Manag. 2002 May;10(3):145-51
references: 11982781
references: Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;40(Pt 4):471-99
references: 11795063