title: Risk of breast cancer following exposure to tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water in Cape Cod, Massachusetts: reanalysis of a case-control study using a modified exposure assessment.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) is an important occupational chemical used in metal degreasing and drycleaning and a prevalent drinking water contaminant. Exposure often occurs with other chemicals but it occurred alone in a pattern that reduced the likelihood of confounding in a unique scenario on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. We previously found a small to moderate increased risk of breast cancer among women with the highest exposures using a simple exposure model. We have taken advantage of technical improvements in publically available software to incorporate a more sophisticated determination of water flow and direction to see if previous results were robust to more accurate exposure assessment.
  
  
  METHODS
  The current analysis used PCE exposure estimates generated with the addition of water distribution modeling software (EPANET 2.0) to test model assumptions, compare exposure distributions to prior methods, and re-examine the risk of breast cancer. In addition, we applied data smoothing to examine nonlinear relationships between breast cancer and exposure. We also compared a set of measured PCE concentrations in water samples collected in 1980 to modeled estimates.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Thirty-nine percent of individuals considered unexposed in prior epidemiological analyses were considered exposed using the current method, but mostly at low exposure levels. As a result, the exposure distribution was shifted downward resulting in a lower value for the 90th percentile, the definition of "high exposure" in prior analyses. The current analyses confirmed a modest increase in the risk of breast cancer for women with high PCE exposure levels defined by either the 90th percentile (adjusted ORs 1.0-1.5 for 0-19 year latency assumptions) or smoothing analysis cut point (adjusted ORs 1.3-2.0 for 0-15 year latency assumptions). Current exposure estimates had a higher correlation with PCE concentrations in water samples (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.65, p < 0.0001) than estimates generated using the prior method (0.54, p < 0.0001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The incorporation of sophisticated flow estimates in the exposure assessment method shifted the PCE exposure distribution downward, but did not meaningfully affect the exposure ranking of subjects or the strength of the association with the risk of breast cancer found in earlier analyses. Thus, the current analyses show a slightly elevated breast cancer risk for highly exposed women, with strengthened exposure assessment and minimization of misclassification by using the latest technology.
authors: Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Talbot 4 West, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
authors: Lisa G
authors: LG
authors: Gallagher
authors: Veronica M
authors: VM
authors: Vieira
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Ozonoff
authors: Thomas F
authors: TF
authors: Webster
authors: Ann
authors: A
authors: Aschengrau
references: Epidemiology. 1998 Sep;9(5):484-9
references: 9730025
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Jan 1;41(1):74-81
references: 17265929
references: Cancer Causes Control. 1997 May;8(3):406-19
references: 9498902
references: J Occup Environ Med. 2000 Mar;42(3):284-310
references: 10738708
references: J Occup Health. 2005 Mar;47(2):171-80
references: 15824483
references: Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25 Suppl 2:1-116
references: 10507118
references: IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1995;63:33-477
references: 9139128
references: Am J Ind Med. 1997 Jul;32(1):1-14
references: 9131206
references: J Occup Environ Med. 1995 Mar;37(3):328-35
references: 7796201
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Jun 1;137(11):1251-8
references: 8322765
references: Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Aug;106 Suppl 4:947-53
references: 9703477
references: Environ Health. 2005 Feb 25;4(1):3
references: 15733317
references: Arch Environ Health. 1993 Sep-Oct;48(5):293-7
references: 8215592
references: Arch Environ Health. 1996 Jul-Aug;51(4):300-9
references: 8757410
references: Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Apr;107(4):265-71
references: 10090704
references: J Occup Environ Med. 1995 Jul;37(7):797-806
references: 7552463
references: Environ Res. 2003 Nov;93(3):248-58
references: 14615234
references: Environ Health. 2008 Jun 02;7:24
references: 18518975
references: Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;109(12 Suppl):2667-711
references: 17503436
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Feb;111(2):167-73
references: 12573900