title: Optimum designs for next-generation sequencing to discover rare variants for common complex disease.
abstract: Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies make it affordable to search for rare and functional variants for common complex diseases systematically. We investigated strategies for enriching rare variants in the samples selected for sequencing so as to optimize the power for their discovery. In particular, we investigated the roles of alternative sources of enrichment in families through computer simulations. We showed that linkage information, extreme phenotype, and nonrandom ascertainment, such as multiply affected families, constitute different sources for enriching rare and functional variants in a sequencing study design. Linkage is well known to have limited power for detecting small genetic effects, and hence not considered to be a powerful tool for discovering variants for common complex diseases. However, those families with some degree of family-specific linkage evidence provide an effective sampling strategy to sub-select the most linkage-informative families for sequencing. Compared with selecting subjects with extreme phenotypes, linkage evidence performs better with larger families, while extreme-phenotype method is more efficient with smaller families. Families with multiple affected siblings were found to provide the largest enrichment of rare variants. Finally, we showed that combined strategies, such as selecting linkage-informative families from multiply affected families, provide much higher enrichment of rare functional variants than either strategy alone.
authors: Division of Biostatistics and Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA. gang@wubios.wustl.edu
authors: Gang
authors: G
authors: Shi
authors: D C
authors: DC
authors: Rao
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Jan;11(1):31-46
references: 19997069
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9362-7
references: 19474294
references: Ann Hum Genet. 1978 Jul;42(1):87-94
references: 686687
references: Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Feb 12;86(2):240-7
references: 20159111
references: BMC Proc. 2011 Nov 29;5 Suppl 9:S82
references: 22373363
references: PLoS Genet. 2009 May;5(5):e1000481
references: 19436704
references: Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009 Jun;19(3):212-9
references: 19481926
references: Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;34(2):171-87
references: 19847924
references: Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Oct 15;19(20):4112-20
references: 20688759
references: Nat Genet. 2009 Jun;41(6):677-87
references: 19430479
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Nov;11(11):773-85
references: 20940738
references: PLoS Genet. 2009 Feb;5(2):e1000384
references: 19214210
references: Nat Genet. 2008 Jun;40(6):695-701
references: 18509313
references: Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;34(2):188-93
references: 19810025
references: Nat Genet. 2002 Jan;30(1):97-101
references: 11731797
references: Nat Genet. 2009 Jun;41(6):666-76
references: 19430483
references: Nature. 2009 Oct 8;461(7265):747-53
references: 19812666
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Jun;11(6):415-25
references: 20479773