title: Soil Physical Constraints on Intrinsic Biodegradation of Petroleum Vapors in a Layered Subsurface.
abstract: Naturally occurring biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in the vadose zone depends on the physical soil environment influencing field-scale gas exchange and pore-scale microbial metabolism. In this study, we evaluated the effect of soil physical heterogeneity on biodegradation of petroleum vapors in a 16-m-deep, layered vadose zone. Soil slurry experiments (soil/water ratio 10:30 w/w, 25°C) on benzene biodegradation under aerobic and well-mixed conditions indicated that the biodegradation potential in different textured soil samples was related to soil type rather than depth, in the order: sandy loam > fine sand > limestone. Similarly, O(2) consumption rates during in situ respiration tests performed at the site were higher in the sandy loam than in the fine sand, although the difference was less significant than in the slurries. Laboratory and field data generally agreed well and suggested a significant potential for aerobic biodegradation, even with nutrient-poor and deep subsurface conditions. In slurries of the sandy loam, the biodegradation potential declined with increasing in situ water saturation (i.e., decreasing air-filled porosity in the field). This showed a relation between antecedent undisturbed field conditions and the slurry biodegradation potential, and suggested airfilled porosity to be a key factor for the intrinsic biodegradation potential in the field.
authors: Dep. of Biotechnology, Chemistry, and Environmental Engineering, Aalborg Univ., Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark, Ramboll Denmark A/S, Sønderbrogade 34, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark.
authors: Andreas H
authors: AH
authors: Kristensen
authors: Kaj
authors: K
authors: Henriksen
authors: Lars
authors: L
authors: Mortensen
authors: Kate M
authors: KM
authors: Scow
authors: Per
authors: P
authors: Moldrup
references: J Environ Qual. 2003 Jul-Aug;32(4):1234-43
references: 12931877
references: Biodegradation. 2003 Dec;14(6):373-84
references: 14669868
references: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 Jun 1;48(3):387-99
references: 19712308
references: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1989 Oct;43(4):505-10
references: 2804391
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 May 1;41(9):3241-8
references: 17539532
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Apr 1;40(7):2304-15
references: 16646467
references: Science. 2004 Jun 11;304(5677):1634-7
references: 15192219
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Mar;57(3):717-20
references: 16348438
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Aug;57(8):2260-8
references: 1768098
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Feb 1;43(3):650-6
references: 19244997
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Jan 1;36(1):30-9
references: 11811488
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Jan;61(1):218-21
references: 16534906
references: J Contam Hydrol. 2006 Dec 15;88(3-4):337-58
references: 16963155
references: Biodegradation. 1995 Jun;6(2):127-40
references: 7772939
references: Biodegradation. 2005 Mar;16(2):115-25
references: 15730022
references: Ground Water Monit Remediat. 2009 Jan 1;29(1):92-104
references: 20664816
references: J Contam Hydrol. 2005 Dec;81(1-4):1-33
references: 16102873
references: Microb Ecol. 2001 Oct;42(3):256-266
references: 12024251