title: The pragmatist's guide to comparative effectiveness research.
abstract: Following an acrimonious health care reform debate involving charges of "death panels," in 2010, Congress explicitly forbade the use of cost-effectiveness analysis in government programs of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. In this context, comparative effectiveness research emerged as an alternative strategy to understand better what works in health care. Put simply, comparative effectiveness research compares the efficacy of two or more diagnostic tests, treatments, or health care delivery methods without any explicit consideration of costs. To economists, the omission of costs from an assessment might seem nonsensical, but we argue that comparative effectiveness research still holds promise. First, it sidesteps one problem facing cost-effectiveness analysis--the widespread political resistance to the idea of using prices in health care. Second, there is little or no evidence on comparative effectiveness for a vast array of treatments: for example, we don't know whether proton-beam therapy, a very expensive treatment for prostate cancer (which requires building a cyclotron and a facility the size of a football field) offers any advantage over conventional approaches. Most drug studies compare new drugs to placebos, rather than "head-to-head" with other drugs on the market, leaving a vacuum as to which drug works best. Finally, the comparative effectiveness research can prove a useful first step even in the absence of cost information if it provides key estimates of treatment effects. After all, such effects are typically expensive to determine and require years or even decades of data. Costs are much easier to measure, and can be appended at a later date as financial Armageddon draws closer.
authors: Harvard Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. amitabh_chandra@harvard.edu
authors: Amitabh
authors: A
authors: Chandra
authors: Anupam B
authors: AB
authors: Jena
authors: Jonathan S
authors: JS
authors: Skinner
references: JAMA. 2000 Dec 27;284(24):3139-44
references: 11135777
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):w34-47
references: 16464904
references: Med Decis Making. 2002 Sep-Oct;22(5):417-30
references: 12365484
references: Health Policy. 1995 Nov;34(2):79-94
references: 10153484
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):w195-203
references: 17264100
references: Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(17):1-99, iii-iv
references: 15876363
references: N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92
references: 10861325
references: N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1925-7
references: 19420360
references: Q J Econ. 2010 May 1;125(2):591-634
references: 20634927
references: N Engl J Med. 2002 Jul 11;347(2):81-8
references: 12110735
references: JAMA. 1994 Sep 21;272(11):859-66
references: 8078163
references: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Aug;61(4):847-59
references: 15896895
references: JAMA. 1998 Apr 22-29;279(16):1278-81
references: 9565008
references: JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2218-25
references: 1901610
references: J Health Econ. 1997 Feb;16(1):1-31
references: 10167341
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1796-804
references: 20921478
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 8;363(2):105-7
references: 20519677
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1805-11
references: 20921479
references: N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84
references: 18046031
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):750-60
references: 17485754
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Oct;15(10):685-93
references: 11089711
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90(11):2337-45
references: 18978402
references: Neurology. 2010 Aug 10;75(6):492-3
references: 20697101
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2081-4
references: 21083379
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):813-23
references: 18474975
references: J Econ Perspect. 2008 Fall;22(4):27-50
references: 19305645
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1714-24
references: 20651002
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):460-5
references: 20054039
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):733-42
references: 20818875
references: J Polit Econ. 2007;115:103-140
references: 18418468
references: J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):695-706
references: 21696840
references: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Sep 7;153(5):307-13
references: 20820040
references: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 18;154(2):131-2
references: 21135287
references: N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1503-16
references: 17387127
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Sep-Oct;20(5):11-29
references: 11558696
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):420-8
references: 16522582
references: J Health Econ. 2003 Mar;22(2):151-85
references: 12606142
references: J Health Econ. 1997 Feb;16(1):33-64
references: 10167344
references: Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):80-7
references: 19911442
references: J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):172-80
references: 23202262
references: Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 20;140(2):145; author reply 148-9
references: 14734340
references: N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 14;359(7):677-87
references: 18703470
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 14;362(2):95-7
references: 20018964
references: Demography. 2010;47 Suppl:S173-90
references: 21302424