title: Suprascapular nerve reconstruction in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: spinal accessory nerve transfer versus C5 root grafting.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is any difference in external rotation following reconstruction of the suprascapular nerve using nerve grafts from the proximal C5 root or nerve transfer using the spinal accessory nerve.
  
  
  METHODS
  External rotation was assessed using the Active Movement Scale immediately before surgery and 3 years postoperatively. Patients with less than 3 years of follow-up were excluded. For patients who underwent secondary shoulder surgery before the 3-year follow-up, the Active Movement Scale score before shoulder surgery was used as the outcome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One-hundred-six patients underwent nerve grafting, while 71 patients underwent spinal accessory nerve transfer. The spinal accessory nerve transfer group had a greater proportion of patients with total plexus palsies, more avulsions, and an earlier age at surgery (p < 0.001). In the C5 nerve graft group, the mean Active Movement Scale score increased from 0.4 to 2.2 (p < 0.001). In the nerve transfer group, the mean score increased from 0.2 to 3.0 (p < 0.001). Preoperatively, the C5 nerve graft group had significantly better scores than the nerve transfer group (p = 0.03). Postoperatively, there was no significant difference between treatments (p = 0.1). Further statistical analysis failed to demonstrate a significant advantage of one surgical treatment over the other.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There was no difference in external rotation after suprascapular nerve reconstruction with either nerve grafting from the proximal C5 root or spinal accessory nerve transfer. The choice of suprascapular nerve reconstruction can be selected depending on specific requirements of the individual lesion.
authors: Toronto, Ontario, Canada From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto.
authors: Raymond
authors: R
authors: Tse
authors: Jeffrey R
authors: JR
authors: Marcus
authors: Christine G
authors: CG
authors: Curtis
authors: Annie
authors: A
authors: Dupuis
authors: Howard M
authors: HM
authors: Clarke
references: Pondaag W, de Boer R, van Wijlen-Hempel MS, Hofstede-Buitenhuis SM, Malessy MJ. External rotation as a result of suprascapular nerve neurotization in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. Neurosurgery 2005;57:530–537.
references: Marcus JR, Clarke HM. Management of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy evaluation, prognosis, and primary surgical treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 2003;30:289–306.
references: Michelow BJ, Clarke HM, Curtis CG, Zuker RM, Seifu Y, Andrews DF. The natural history of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:675–680.
references: Clarke HM, Curtis CG. An approach to obstetrical brachial plexus injuries. Hand Clin. 1995;11:563–580.
references: Capek L, Clarke HM, Curtis CG. Neuroma-in-continuity resection: Early outcome in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1555–1562.
references: Borschel GH, Clarke HM. Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:144e–155e.
references: Clarke HM, Al-Qattan MM, Curtis CG, Zuker RM. Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: Results following neurolysis of conducting neuromas-in-continuity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:974–982.
references: Lin JC, Schwentker-Colizza A, Curtis CG, Clarke HM. Final results of grafting versus neurolysis in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:939–948.
references: Alhodaib N, Clarke HM. Outcomes of treatment for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. In: Chung KC, McGillicuddy JE eds. Practical Management of Pediatric and Adult Brachial Plexus Palsies. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011.
references: Capek L, Clarke HM, Zuker RM. Endoscopic sural nerve harvest in the pediatric patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:884–888.
references: Clarke HM. An update on endoscopic sural nerve harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1304.
references: Curtis C, Stephens D, Clarke HM, Andrews D. The active movement scale: An evaluative tool for infants with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:470–478.
references: Terzis JK, Kostas I. Outcomes with suprascapular nerve reconstruction in obstetrical brachial plexus patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1267–1278.
references: van Ouwerkerk WJ, Uitdehaag BM, Strijers RL, et al. Accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer to restore shoulder exorotation in otherwise spontaneously recovered obstetric brachial plexus lesions. Neurosurgery 2006;59:858–867.
references: Kawabata H, Kawai H, Masatomi T, Yasui N. Accessory nerve neurotization in infants with brachial plexus birth palsy. Microsurgery 1994;15:768–772.
references: Grossman JA, Di Taranto P, Alfonso D, Ramos LE, Price AE. Shoulder function following partial spinal accessory nerve transfer for brachial plexus birth injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:373–375.
references: Xu J, Cheng X, Gu Y. Different methods and results in the treatment of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000;16:417–420.
references: Chuang DC, Mardini S, Ma HS. Surgical strategy for infant obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: Experiences at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:132–142.