title: Providing support for distinctive processing: the isolation effect in young and older adults.
abstract: The isolation paradigm is the classic method for studying the effects of distinctiveness on memory (Hunt, 1995). Previous studies using the isolation paradigm with older adults (Bireta, Suprenant, & Neath, 2008; Cimbalo & Brink, 1982; Geraci, McDaniel, Manzano, & Roediger (2009); Vitali et al., 2006) placed the isolated items late in the study list. The current experiments, which are the first to investigate the isolation effect in young and older adults when the isolated item occurs early in the list, were motivated by a new framework for understanding age-related differences in the beneficial effects of distinctive processing. The framework, which is motivated by Hunt's (2006) discussion of distinctiveness and Craik's (1986) environmental support view, proposes that when contextual support is provided for the processing of both the difference and similarity components, older adults are more likely to show beneficial effects of distinctiveness. In Experiment 1, young adults showed both early and late isolation effects, while older adults showed only a late isolation effect. In the first experiment the isolated item was the word "table" in a list of fish names. In Experiment 2, the contrast between the isolated item and background items was increased by isolating numbers in a list of words. In the second experiment older adults, as well as young adults, showed an early isolation effect.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA. rebekah.smith@utsa.edu
authors: Rebekah E
authors: RE
authors: Smith
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 May;26(3):649-57
references: 10855423
references: Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):175-80
references: 19223567
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Nov;27(6):1359-66
references: 11713872
references: Neurol Sci. 2006 Jul;27(3):166-72
references: 16897628
references: J Gerontol. 1993 Jul;48(4):P157-71
references: 8315232
references: Can J Psychol. 1988 Dec;42(4):414-23
references: 3268323
references: Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1439-49
references: 19015503
references: Psychol Aging. 2005 Sep;20(3):486-92
references: 16248707
references: Psychol Bull. 1965 Jun;63:410-24
references: 14314076
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Nov;18(6):1298-309
references: 1447553
references: Exp Aging Res. 1977 Jul-Nov;3(4-6):337-83
references: 604077
references: Memory. 2009 Jan;17(1):49-53
references: 19101843
references: Psychol Aging. 1990 Jun;5(2):242-9
references: 2378689
references: J Gerontol. 1993 Mar;48(2):P62-8
references: 8473699
references: Exp Psychol. 2011;58(2):117-24
references: 20494859
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Mar;61(3):345-52
references: 17896205
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):54-66
references: 11204107
references: J Gen Psychol. 1982 Jan;106(1st Half):69-76
references: 7057166
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jan;63(1):50-64
references: 19370485
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Mar;2(1):105-12
references: 24203592