title: Effect of Lactobacillus fermentum on beta2 toxin production by Clostridium perfringens.
abstract: Clostridium perfringens, although a member of the normal gut flora, is also an important cause of intestinal disease in animals and, to a lesser extent, in humans. Disease is associated with the production of one or more toxins, and little is known about environmental influences on the production of these toxins. One of the health-promoting effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is the establishment and maintenance of a low pH in the intestine since an acidic environment inhibits the growth of many potentially harmful bacteria. Here, the effect of the LAB Lactobacillus fermentum on beta2 toxin production by C. perfringens is described. Coculturing of C. perfringens with L. fermentum showed that under in vitro conditions, L. fermentum was capable of silencing beta2 toxin production by C. perfringens without influencing bacterial viability. The reduction in toxin production was shown to be most likely a result of the decline in pH. Quantitative PCR showed that the reduction in beta2 toxin production was due to a decrease in cpb2 mRNA. These results suggest that in the intestine, the production of beta2 toxin by C. perfringens might be regulated by other members of the normal intestinal flora.
authors: Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, P.O. Box 80.158, 3508TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
authors: Janneke G
authors: JG
authors: Allaart
authors: Alphons J A M
authors: AJ
authors: van Asten
authors: Johannes C M
authors: JC
authors: Vernooij
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Gröne
references: J Dairy Res. 2006 Aug;73(3):357-66
references: 16836803
references: J Bacteriol. 2008 Jan;190(2):743-6
references: 17933897
references: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:165-99
references: 11544353
references: Trends Microbiol. 1996 Nov;4(11):430-5
references: 8950812
references: Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2006 Sep;231(8):1333-45
references: 16946402
references: Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 May 26;41(2):85-101
references: 9704859
references: J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Jan;102(1):116-23
references: 17184326
references: Gut. 2001 Apr;48(4):571-7
references: 11247905
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Aug;41(8):3584-91
references: 12904359
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 May 16;222(1):137-41
references: 12757957
references: J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2004 Dec;51(10):423-6
references: 15606864
references: Gene. 1997 Dec 5;203(1):65-73
references: 9426008
references: Bioessays. 1998 Apr;20(4):336-43
references: 9619105
references: Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996 Apr;9(2):216-34
references: 8964036
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Feb;57(2):499-502
references: 1849714
references: Vet Microbiol. 2003 Jul 1;94(2):121-9
references: 12781480
references: Anaerobe. 2008 Apr;14(2):102-8
references: 18353695
references: Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999 Dec;2(6):582-7
references: 10607620
references: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1999 Jan;39(1):13-126
references: 10028126
references: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;11(11):1012-5
references: 1295753
references: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 May;3(5):431-8
references: 15821725
references: Can J Microbiol. 1964 Jun;10:329-44
references: 14187001
references: Mol Microbiol. 2005 May;56(3):747-62
references: 15819629
references: Vet Microbiol. 2007 Feb 25;120(1-2):151-7
references: 17126502
references: Vet Microbiol. 2004 Jan 14;98(1):45-53
references: 14738781
references: Cell Microbiol. 2009 Sep;11(9):1306-28
references: 19438515
references: Trends Microbiol. 1999 Mar;7(3):104-10
references: 10203838
references: J Bacteriol. 2009 Jun;191(12):3919-27
references: 19363118
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Feb;37(2):358-61
references: 9889218