title: Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia.
abstract: It has long been argued that face processing requires disproportionate reliance on holistic or configural processing, relative to that required for non-face object recognition, and that a disruption of such holistic processing may be causally implicated in prosopagnosia. Previously, we demonstrated that individuals with congenital prosopagnosia (CP) did not show the normal face inversion effect (better performance for upright compared to inverted faces) and evinced a local (rather than the normal global) bias in a compound letter global/local (GL) task, supporting the claim of disrupted holistic processing in prosopagnosia. Here, we investigate further the nature of holistic processing impairments in CP, first by confirming, in a large sample of CP individuals, the absence of the normal face inversion effect and the presence of the local bias on the GL task, and, second, by employing the composite face paradigm, often regarded as the gold standard for measuring holistic face processing. In this last task, we show that, in contrast with controls, the CP group perform equivalently with aligned and misaligned faces and was impervious to (the normal) interference from the task-irrelevant bottom part of faces. Interestingly, the extent of the local bias evident in the composite task is correlated with the abnormality of performance on diagnostic face processing tasks. Furthermore, there is a significant correlation between the magnitude of the local bias in the GL and performance on the composite task. These results provide further evidence for impaired holistic processing in CP and, moreover, corroborate the critical role of this type of processing for intact face recognition.
authors: Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. galiaa@bgu.ac.il
authors: Galia
authors: G
authors: Avidan
authors: Michal
authors: M
authors: Tanzer
authors: Marlene
authors: M
authors: Behrmann
references: Brain Cogn. 2009 Mar;69(2):262-8
references: 18819739
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Apr;28(2):431-46
references: 11999864
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1828-41
references: 20227431
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;21(1):38-43
references: 20424020
references: Perception. 1999;28(3):341-59
references: 10615472
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Mar;48(4):933-44
references: 19944710
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jun 1;6(6):255-260
references: 12039607
references: Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):608-15
references: 16866747
references: Psychol Rev. 1998 Jul;105(3):482-98
references: 9697428
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jul;17(7):1130-49
references: 16102241
references: J Neuropsychol. 2011 Mar;5(Pt 1):1-14
references: 21366884
references: Neuroreport. 2000 Jan 17;11(1):79-83
references: 10683834
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Oct;17(10):1652-66
references: 16269103
references: J Neuropsychol. 2009 Mar;3(Pt 1):69-78
references: 19338717
references: Cognition. 2002 Jul;84(3):321-41
references: 12044738
references: Neuroreport. 1999 Mar 17;10(4):823-7
references: 10208555
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;23(7):1723-40
references: 20617881
references: Perception. 1994;23(1):65-74
references: 7936977
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Apr;9(4):180-7
references: 15808500
references: Cortex. 2010 Mar;46(3):374-89
references: 19589510
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Apr 1;15(3):419-31
references: 12729493
references: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Apr;6(4):428-32
references: 12627167
references: Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):344-54
references: 16028588
references: PLoS One. 2011 Jan 25;6(1):e15702
references: 21283572
references: Brain Cogn. 1989 Jul;10(2):149-70
references: 2757824
references: J Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;2(1):141-64
references: 19334309
references: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2007 Jun;24(4):419-30
references: 18416499
references: Neurology. 2005 Jul 26;65(2):270-4
references: 16043798
references: Vision Res. 2009 Nov;49(23):2856-61
references: 19716376
references: Perception. 2004;33(10):1221-31
references: 15693667
references: Cortex. 2010 Sep;46(8):965-81
references: 19683710
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Apr;25(7):2234-47
references: 17439500
references: Brain Cogn. 2006 Jul;61(2):139-58
references: 16466839
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):258-63
references: 19293091
references: Perception. 1987;16(6):747-59
references: 3454432
references: Cortex. 2007 Aug;43(6):718-33
references: 17710824
references: Perception. 2000;29(2):159-70
references: 10820599
references: J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 1;17(11):4302-11
references: 9151747
references: Psychol Sci. 2004 Nov;15(11):762-8
references: 15482448
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):628-34
references: 7790837
references: Adv Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jul 01;6:23-34
references: 20689639
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Aug;22(4):904-15
references: 8756958
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):48-63
references: 16417682
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1998 Aug;51(3):449-73
references: 9745377
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jun;128(2):274-89
references: 18396260
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jan;19(1):132-46
references: 17214570
references: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1226-1235
references: 21333662
references: Neuropsychologia. 2009 Nov;47(13):2798-811
references: 19524599
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Dec;48(14):4057-92
references: 20875437
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):580-93
references: 16768361
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):743-8
references: 21037176
references: PLoS One. 2009 Oct 12;4(10):e7414
references: 19823580
references: Neurology. 2002 Jan 8;58(1):71-8
references: 11781408
references: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(14):2125-36
references: 16243056
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jul;17(7):1150-67
references: 16102242
references: Curr Biol. 2009 Jul 14;19(13):1146-50
references: 19481456
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1038-42
references: 16615325
references: J Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;2(1):245-68
references: 19334313
references: Cortex. 2012 Mar;48(3):344-52
references: 21329915
references: Perception. 2009;38(2):242-60
references: 19400433
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 May;46(2):225-45
references: 8316637
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Nov;114(3):273-309
references: 14670701
references: Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):24-38
references: 1529037
references: J Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;2(1):227-44
references: 19334312
references: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Jun;2(2):104-13
references: 18985129
references: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Jul;26(5):423-55
references: 19921582