title: Key visual features for rapid categorization of animals in natural scenes.
abstract: In speeded categorization tasks, decisions could be based on diagnostic target features or they may need the activation of complete representations of the object. Depending on task requirements, the priming of feature detectors through top-down expectation might lower the threshold of selective units or speed up the rate of information accumulation. In the present paper, 40 subjects performed a rapid go/no-go animal/non-animal categorization task with 400 briefly flashed natural scenes to study how performance depends on physical scene characteristics, target configuration, and the presence or absence of diagnostic animal features. Performance was evaluated both in terms of accuracy and speed and d' curves were plotted as a function of reaction time (RT). Such d' curves give an estimation of the processing dynamics for studied features and characteristics over the entire subject population. Global image characteristics such as color and brightness do not critically influence categorization speed, although they slightly influence accuracy. Global critical factors include the presence of a canonical animal posture and animal/background size ratio suggesting the role of coarse global form. Performance was best for both accuracy and speed, when the animal was in a typical posture and when it occupied about 20-30% of the image. The presence of diagnostic animal features was another critical factor. Performance was significantly impaired both in accuracy (drop 3.3-7.5%) and speed (median RT increase 7-16 ms) when diagnostic animal parts (eyes, mouth, and limbs) were missing. Such animal features were shown to influence performance very early when only 15-25% of the response had been produced. In agreement with other experimental and modeling studies, our results support fast diagnostic recognition of animals based on key intermediate features and priming based on the subject's expertise.
authors: Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition Toulouse, France.
authors: Arnaud
authors: A
authors: Delorme
authors: Ghislaine
authors: G
authors: Richard
authors: Michele
authors: M
authors: Fabre-Thorpe
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Apr;21(7):2007-18
references: 15869494
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):58-64
references: 17188555
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Aug;8(8):363-70
references: 15335463
references: Perception. 1993;22(2):229-48
references: 8474847
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Mar;26(2):470-88
references: 10764107
references: Cereb Cortex. 2003 Jan;13(1):90-9
references: 12466220
references: Eur J Neurosci. 1999 Apr;11(4):1223-38
references: 10103118
references: Neural Netw. 2001 Jul-Sep;14(6-7):795-803
references: 11665771
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Dec;31(6):1476-92
references: 16366803
references: Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(26):3286-97
references: 17967472
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):509-20
references: 12018503
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Sep;14(5):869-76
references: 11576191
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Oct;16(4):372-89
references: 2230660
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 May 15;13(4):454-61
references: 11388919
references: Percept Psychophys. 2008 Oct;70(7):1366-78
references: 18927019
references: J Neurosci. 1996 Aug 15;16(16):5154-67
references: 8756444
references: Curr Biol. 2000 Jun 29;10(13):805-8
references: 10898985
references: J Vis. 2008 Oct 31;8(13):11.1-18
references: 19146341
references: J Neurophysiol. 1972 Jan;35(1):96-111
references: 4621506
references: Vision Res. 2002 Oct;42(23):2593-615
references: 12446033
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references: 7605061
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 May;53(2):513-36
references: 10881616
references: J Vis. 2010 Mar 29;10(3):14.1-13
references: 20377291
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16598-603
references: 17909181
references: Anim Cogn. 2010 May;13(3):405-18
references: 19921288
references: Nature. 2004 May 27;429(6990):410-3
references: 15164062
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Dec;10(12):538-45
references: 17071128
references: J Vis. 2009 Jul 10;9(7):7
references: 19761322
references: Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):520-2
references: 8632824
references: J Physiol. 1982 Jul;328:171-90
references: 7131312
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 10;104(15):6424-9
references: 17404214
references: Psychol Sci. 2006 Jan;17(1):1-6
references: 16371136
references: Exp Brain Res. 1982;47(3):329-42
references: 7128705
references: Neuron. 2007 Apr 19;54(2):303-18
references: 17442250
references: Nature. 2002 Jan 17;415(6869):318-20
references: 11797008
references: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Jul;5(7):682-7
references: 12055634
references: J Vis. 2008 Dec 22;8(16):12.1-13
references: 19146278
references: Science. 2005 Apr 22;308(5721):529-34
references: 15845848
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Feb 15;14(2):187-98
references: 11970785
references: PLoS One. 2009 Jun 17;4(6):e5927
references: 19536292
references: Vision Res. 2000;40(16):2187-200
references: 10878280
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29
references: 15263892
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Feb 16;3(2):e31
references: 17305422
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Nov;54(4):1105-24
references: 11765735
references: Vision Res. 2005 May;45(11):1459-69
references: 15743615
references: J Vis. 2003;3(6):440-55
references: 12901715
references: Mem Cognit. 2007 Apr;35(3):393-401
references: 17691140
references: Science. 2001 Jan 12;291(5502):260-3
references: 11253215
references: Cereb Cortex. 1994 Sep-Oct;4(5):509-22
references: 7833652
references: Cognition. 1998 Jul;67(1-2):147-79
references: 9735539
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Dec;11(12):520-7
references: 18024143
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Feb 15;13(2):171-80
references: 11244543
references: Vision Res. 2004 Apr;44(9):877-94
references: 14992832
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Jun;24(3):453-76; discussion 476-509
references: 11682799