title: Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.
abstract: The mechanism of eukaryotic chemotaxis remains unclear despite intensive study. The most frequently described mechanism acts through attractants causing actin polymerization, in turn leading to pseudopod formation and cell movement. We recently proposed an alternative mechanism, supported by several lines of data, in which pseudopods are made by a self-generated cycle. If chemoattractants are present, they modulate the cycle rather than directly causing actin polymerization. The aim of this work is to test the explanatory and predictive powers of such pseudopod-based models to predict the complex behaviour of cells in chemotaxis. We have now tested the effectiveness of this mechanism using a computational model of cell movement and chemotaxis based on pseudopod autocatalysis. The model reproduces a surprisingly wide range of existing data about cell movement and chemotaxis. It simulates cell polarization and persistence without stimuli and selection of accurate pseudopods when chemoattractant gradients are present. It predicts both bias of pseudopod position in low chemoattractant gradients and--unexpectedly--lateral pseudopod initiation in high gradients. To test the predictive ability of the model, we looked for untested and novel predictions. One prediction from the model is that the angle between successive pseudopods at the front of the cell will increase in proportion to the difference between the cell's direction and the direction of the gradient. We measured the angles between pseudopods in chemotaxing Dictyostelium cells under different conditions and found the results agreed with the model extremely well. Our model and data together suggest that in rapidly moving cells like Dictyostelium and neutrophils an intrinsic pseudopod cycle lies at the heart of cell motility. This implies that the mechanism behind chemotaxis relies on modification of intrinsic pseudopod behaviour, more than generation of new pseudopods or actin polymerization by chemoattractants.
authors: Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
authors: Matthew P
authors: MP
authors: Neilson
authors: Douwe M
authors: DM
authors: Veltman
authors: Peter J M
authors: PJ
authors: van Haastert
authors: Steven D
authors: SD
authors: Webb
authors: John A
authors: JA
authors: Mackenzie
authors: Robert H
authors: RH
authors: Insall
references: Biosystems. 1994;33(2):75-87
references: 7811960
references: J Cell Sci. 1999 Sep;112 ( Pt 17):2867-74
references: 10444381
references: PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep;5(9):e221
references: 17696648
references: J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 6;278(23):20445-8
references: 12672811
references: Dev Cell. 2006 Sep;11(3):279-87
references: 16950120
references: J Cell Sci. 1993 Dec;106 ( Pt 4):1005-13
references: 7510298
references: Nature. 2002 Sep 5;419(6902):21
references: 12214215
references: Dev Cell. 2009 Sep;17(3):310-22
references: 19758556
references: Science. 2008 Oct 17;322(5900):390-5
references: 18927383
references: Biophys J. 2004 Dec;87(6):3764-74
references: 15465874
references: PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep;5(9):e233
references: 17760506
references: Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008 Feb;20(1):35-40
references: 18207721
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 1;100(7):4006-11
references: 12649322
references: J Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;106(2):303-9
references: 3339093
references: Curr Biol. 2007 May 1;17(9):813-7
references: 17462897
references: Cell. 1982 Feb;28(2):225-32
references: 6277507
references: Nature. 2008 May 22;453(7194):475-80
references: 18497816
references: Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Feb;9(2):193-200
references: 17220879
references: Curr Biol. 1996 Jun 1;6(6):719-29
references: 8793298
references: Biophys J. 2008 May 1;94(9):3671-83
references: 18199677
references: PLoS One. 2008 Aug 27;3(8):e3068
references: 18728784
references: PLoS One. 2008 May 07;3(5):e2093
references: 18461173
references: Dev Cell. 2005 Feb;8(2):215-27
references: 15691763
references: J Cell Sci. 2010 May 15;123(Pt 10):1724-31
references: 20427323
references: Science. 2001 Mar 23;291(5512):2408-11
references: 11264536
references: Ann Biomed Eng. 2001 Aug;29(8):677-91
references: 11556724
references: J Cell Sci. 2006 Jul 1;119(Pt 13):2749-57
references: 16772332
references: Biophys J. 2010 Apr 21;98(8):1571-81
references: 20409477
references: HFSP J. 2009 Aug;3(4):282-6
references: 20057961
references: PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5253
references: 19384419
references: Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Dec;14(12):5028-37
references: 14595116
references: Methods Cell Biol. 2008;84:893-910
references: 17964953
references: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;9(1):9-16
references: 2833359
references: J Cell Biol. 2003 Feb 3;160(3):375-85
references: 12551955
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 27;103(26):9761-6
references: 16782813
references: J Cell Sci. 1981 Dec;52:1-10
references: 7037797
references: Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39:265-89
references: 20192768
references: Curr Biol. 2009 Feb 10;19(3):253-9
references: 19200726
references: PLoS One. 2009 Aug 31;4(8):e6842
references: 19718261
references: J Cell Sci. 2008 Oct 1;121(Pt 19):3196-206
references: 18782862
references: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Jun;11(6):453-8
references: 20445546
references: Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Jul;4(7):509-13
references: 12080346