title: Basal Ganglia preferentially encode context dependent choice in a two-armed bandit task.
abstract: Decision is a self-generated phenomenon, which is hard to track with standard time averaging methods, such as peri-event time histograms (PETHs), used in behaving animals. Reasons include variability in duration of events within a task and uneven reaction time of animals. We have developed a temporal normalization method where PETHs were juxtaposed all along task events and compared between neurons. We applied this method to neurons recorded in striatum and GPi of behaving monkeys involved in a choice task. We observed a significantly higher homogeneity of neuron activity profile distributions in GPi than in striatum. Focusing on the period of the task during which the decision was taken, we showed that approximately one quarter of all recorded neurons exhibited tuning functions. These so-called coding neurons had average firing rates that varied as a function of the value of both presented cues, a combination here referred to as context, and/or value of the chosen cue. The tuning functions were used to build a simple maximum likelihood estimation model, which revealed that (i) GPi neurons are more efficient at encoding both choice and context than striatal neurons and (ii) context prediction rates were higher than those for choice. Furthermore, the mutual information between choice or context values and decision period average firing rate was higher in GPi than in striatum. Considered together, these results suggest a convergence process of the global information flow between striatum and GPi, preferentially involving context encoding, which could be used by the network to perform decision-making.
authors: Université de Bordeaux, UMR 5293, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives Bordeaux, France.
authors: André
authors: A
authors: Garenne
authors: Benjamin
authors: B
authors: Pasquereau
authors: Martin
authors: M
authors: Guthrie
authors: Bernard
authors: B
authors: Bioulac
authors: Thomas
authors: T
authors: Boraud
references: J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 10;24(45):10047-56
references: 15537873
references: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):947-57
references: 10526332
references: Brain. 2001 Mar;124(Pt 3):546-57
references: 11222455
references: Biol Cybern. 2001 Jun;84(6):401-10
references: 11417052
references: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Dec;10(12):1505-7
references: 18043583
references: J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 31;27(5):1176-83
references: 17267573
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:87-115
references: 16318590
references: Neuron. 2009 Sep 24;63(6):733-45
references: 19778504
references: Prog Neurobiol. 1996 Nov;50(4):381-425
references: 9004351
references: J Comput Neurosci. 2010 Aug;29(1-2):149-169
references: 19449095
references: J Gen Physiol. 1973 Mar;61(3):305-22
references: 4540179
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Aug;24(4):1201-8
references: 16930445
references: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Aug;9(8):1057-63
references: 16862149
references: Neuroscience. 2001;103(1):117-23
references: 11311792
references: Exp Neurol. 2010 Aug;224(2):542-4
references: 20653074
references: Prog Neurobiol. 2003 Dec;71(6):439-73
references: 15013228
references: Neuron. 2010 Aug 12;67(3):466-79
references: 20696383
references: Neural Comput. 2010 Jan;22(1):121-57
references: 19764880
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 May;99(5):2672-93
references: 18216233
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 1;102(9):3507-12
references: 15728369
references: J Neurophysiol. 1991 Feb;65(2):301-29
references: 2016643
references: Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005 Jun;48(3):509-26
references: 15914255
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 May;1104:213-28
references: 17435124
references: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Aug;9(8):987-8
references: 16871163
references: Prog Brain Res. 2004;143:461-6
references: 14653188
references: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):758-72
references: 19052110
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 29;26(13):3567-83
references: 16571765
references: IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2005 Aug;27(8):1226-38
references: 16119262