title: Nutritional and sensory profile of two Indian rice varieties with different degrees of polishing.
abstract: Traditional hand-pounded rice has been replaced today with highly polished white rice in the Asian Indian diets. The study aimed to evaluate the nutritional as well as the sensory differences between the brown (0% polish) and the rice milled to different degrees of polish (2.3, 4.4 and 8.0%). Bapatla and Uma (red pigmented) varieties in both raw and parboiled forms were used. The protein, fat, dietary fibre, γ-oryzanol, polyphenols, vitamin E, total antioxidant activity and free radical scavenging abilities of the brown rice decreased while the available carbohydrates increased with polishing. Sensory attributes of the cooked rice samples (whiteness, grain intactness, fluffiness, firmness, stickiness, chewiness and the cooked rice aroma) were evaluated by trained panelists. Scores for branny taste and chewiness decreased with polishing. On the whole, brown rice of both the varieties was readily accepted by the well-informed sensory trained panelists.
authors: Madras Diabetes Research Foundation & Dr Mohan's Diabetes Specialties Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for Non-Communicable Diseases, International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Centre of Education, Gopalapuram, Chennai, India.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Shobana
authors: N G
authors: NG
authors: Malleshi
authors: V
authors: V
authors: Sudha
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Spiegelman
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Hong
authors: F B
authors: FB
authors: Hu
authors: W C
authors: WC
authors: Willett
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Krishnaswamy
authors: V
authors: V
authors: Mohan
references: Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):961-9
references: 20548009
references: Br J Nutr. 2009 Nov;102(10):1498-506
references: 19586573
references: J Am Coll Nutr. 2002 Aug;21(4):298-306
references: 12166526
references: Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1998 Mar;48(1):7-12
references: 9754398
references: Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2006 May-Jun;57(3-4):151-8
references: 17127465
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000 May;54(5):380-5
references: 10822284
references: Public Health Nutr. 2011 Apr;14(4):591-8
references: 20701818
references: J Agric Food Chem. 1983 May-Jun;31(3):476-82
references: 6309935
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Oct 18;54(21):8127-33
references: 17032019
references: J Agric Food Chem. 1999 Jul;47(7):2724-8
references: 10552553
references: Metabolism. 2009 May;58(5):675-81
references: 19375591
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Apr 22;57(8):3210-6
references: 19278227
references: Diabetes Care. 2008 Dec;31(12):2281-3
references: 18835944
references: Biol Pharm Bull. 2005 Aug;28(8):1539-41
references: 16079511
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 May;45(5 Suppl):1243-55
references: 3034048
references: FAO Food Nutr Pap. 2006;84:1-334
references: 19172986
references: Anal Biochem. 1999 May 1;269(2):337-41
references: 10222007
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 May;75(5):848-55
references: 11976158
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Sep 11;50(19):5326-32
references: 12207469
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Oct 9;50(21):6182-7
references: 12358499
references: Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007 Aug;51(8):1006-19
references: 17639995
references: J Nutr Biochem. 2002 Mar;13(3):175-187
references: 11893482
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Mar;77(3):622-9
references: 12600852
references: J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006 Aug 28;41(5):1523-42
references: 16753277
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Sep;76(3):535-40
references: 12197996
references: J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Oct;111(10):1517-22
references: 21963018