title: Cuticular wax biosynthesis as a way of inducing drought resistance.
abstract: Plants have evolved diverse adaptive strategies to cope with drought or water deficit conditions, such as stomatal closure, maintenance of root growth and water uptake, and biosynthesis of osmoprotectants. Accumulation of cuticular waxes also contributes to drought resistance. However, it is still unclear how cuticular wax biosynthesis is regulated in response to drought and how it is associated with plant responses to drought at the molecular level. The abscisic acid (ABA)-inducible MYB96 transcription factor plays a role in drought resistance. Notably, it also regulates cuticular wax biosynthesis by binding directly to the promoters of genes encoding fatty acid elongating enzymes, such as KCS, KCR and ECR that constitute a rate-limiting step in cuticular wax biosynthesis. In the myb96-1D mutant that constitutively express the MYB96 gene, many of genes involved in cuticular wax biosynthesis are upregulated and accordingly, cuticular wax accumulation is greatly elevated. In contrast, cuticular wax accumulation is reduced in the myb96-1 mutant, linking drought with cuticular wax biosynthesis. It is evident that the MYB96 transcription factor incorporates drought stress signals into a gene regulatory network that modulates cuticular wax biosynthesis under drought stress conditions, providing a first molecular mechanism by which cuticular wax biosynthesis contributes to drought resistance and protection from pathogenic and mechanical damages as well.
authors: Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
authors: Pil Joon
authors: PJ
authors: Seo
authors: Chung-Mo
authors: CM
authors: Park
references: Plant Physiol. 2009 Sep;151(1):275-89
references: 19625633
references: Methods Enzymol. 2007;428:109-28
references: 17875414
references: Plant Physiol. 2008 Dec;148(4):1925-37
references: 18849483
references: Plant J. 2005 Jun;42(5):689-707
references: 15918883
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Jun;10(3):296-302
references: 17468040
references: J Plant Physiol. 2007 Sep;164(9):1134-43
references: 16904233
references: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:683-707
references: 18251711
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Dec;12(6):721-7
references: 19864175
references: Plant Cell. 2004 Sep;16(9):2463-80
references: 15319479
references: Plant J. 2008 Jan;53(1):53-64
references: 17971045
references: Nature. 2001 Mar 15;410(6826):327-30
references: 11268200
references: Plant J. 1997 Jul;12(1):121-31
references: 9263455
references: Cell. 2007 Aug 24;130(4):663-77
references: 17719544
references: New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):471-83
references: 20149112
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2007 Jun;64(3):265-78
references: 17347795
references: Plant Physiol. 2009 Dec;151(4):1918-29
references: 19819982
references: Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Oct;4(10):1002-4
references: 19826230
references: Plant J. 2007 Nov;52(3):485-98
references: 17727615
references: J Exp Bot. 2001 Oct;52(363):2023-32
references: 11559738
references: Planta. 1967 Mar;75(1):23-7
references: 24550011
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Oct;6(5):410-7
references: 12972040