title: A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to assess radiographer familiarity and preferences with digital radiography in four teaching hospitals and thereafter make recommendations in line with the migration from screen film to digital radiography.
  
  
  METHODS
  A questionnaire was designed to collect data from either qualified or student radiographers from four teaching hospitals. From the four teaching hospitals, there were a total of 205 potential respondents. Among other things, responses regarding experiences and preferences with digital radiography, quality control procedures, patient dose, advantages and disadvantages of digital radiography were sought. The information collected was based on self-reporting by the participants. The study is exploratory in nature and descriptive statistics were generated from the collected data using Microsoft Excel 2007 and StatsDirect software.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sixty-three out of 205 (31%) radiographers from all the four radiology centers responded to the circulated questionnaire. Only 15% (8) of the qualified radiographers had 4 or more years of experience with digital radiography compared to 68% (36) for the same amount of experience with screen-film radiography. Sixty-one percent (38) of the participants had been exposed to digital radiography during their lectures while at university. A small proportion, 16% (10) of the respondents underwent formal training in quality control procedures on the digital X-ray units they were using. Slightly more than half (55%) of the participants felt it was easier for them to retake an image in digital radiography than in screen film radiography.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of this survey showed that the participants are familiar with digital radiography and have embraced this relatively new technology as shown by the fact that they can identify both its advantages and disadvantages as applied to clinical practice. However, there are minimal quality control procedures specific to digital radiography being undertaken as such there is need for formal education, continuing education and manufacturer training with respect to quality control as institutions make the transition from conventional screen film radiology to digital radiology.
authors: School of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Nyathi
authors: Tf
authors: T
authors: Chirwa
authors: Dg
authors: D
authors: van der Merwe
references: Eur Radiol. 2008 Sep;18(9):1818-30
references: 18431577
references: J Digit Imaging. 2007 Jun;20(2):140-8
references: 17318704
references: Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):266-73
references: 19345030
references: J Digit Imaging. 2006;19 Suppl 1:29-34
references: 16953340
references: Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):194-201
references: 19695809
references: J Digit Imaging. 2002 Mar;15(1):22-6
references: 12134211
references: J Digit Imaging. 2002 Sep;15(3):132-40
references: 12481227
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Jul;6(7):486-90
references: 19560064
references: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Aug 7;54(15):4645-70
references: 19590115
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Jun;4(6):371-88
references: 17544139
references: Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2005 Oct;1(2):e12
references: 21625280