title: Comparison of tiered formularies and reference pricing policies: a systematic review.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To synthesize methodologically comparable evidence from the published literature regarding the outcomes of tiered formularies and therapeutic reference pricing of prescription drugs.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the following electronic databases: ABI/Inform, CINAHL, Clinical Evidence, Digital Dissertations & Theses, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (which incorporates ACP Journal Club, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Methodology Register, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, Health Technology Assessments and NHS Economic Evaluation Database), EconLit, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, MEDLINE, PAIS International and PAIS Archive, and the Web of Science. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and several grey literature sources. We sought English-language studies published from 1986 to 2007 that examined the effects of either therapeutic reference pricing or tiered formularies, reported on outcomes relevant to patient care and cost-effectiveness, and employed quantitative study designs that included concurrent or historical comparison groups. We abstracted and assessed potentially appropriate articles using a modified version of the data abstraction form developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group.
  
  
  RESULTS
  From an initial list of 2964 citations, 12 citations (representing 11 studies) were deemed eligible for inclusion in our review: 3 studies (reported in 4 articles) of reference pricing and 8 studies of tiered formularies. The introduction of reference pricing was associated with reduced plan spending, switching to preferred medicines, reduced overall drug utilization and short-term increases in the use of physician services. Reference pricing was not associated with adverse health impacts. The introduction of tiered formularies was associated with reduced plan expenditures, greater patient costs and increased rates of non-compliance with prescribed drug therapy. From the data available, we were unable to examine the hypothesis that tiered formulary policies result in greater use of physician services and potentially worse health outcomes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The available evidence does not clearly differentiate between reference pricing and tiered formularies in terms of policy outcomes. Reference pricing appears to have a slight evidentiary advantage, given that patients' health outcomes under tiered formularies have not been well studied and that tiered formularies are associated with increased rates of medicine discontinuation.
authors: Steve
authors: S
authors: Morgan
authors: Gillian
authors: G
authors: Hanley
authors: Devon
authors: D
authors: Greyson
references: Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):360-9
references: 17567237
references: Med Care. 2001 Dec;39(12):1293-304
references: 11717571
references: Clin Ther. 2003 Dec;25(12):3147-61; discussion 3144-6
references: 14749153
references: Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2005;4(2):87-98
references: 16162028
references: Health Policy. 2007 Apr;81(1):17-28
references: 16777256
references: N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 14;346(11):822-9
references: 11893794
references: J Manag Care Pharm. 2003 Mar-Apr;9(2):123-33
references: 14613341
references: N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2224-32
references: 14657430
references: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2003 Jun;3(3):303-15
references: 19807378
references: Am J Manag Care. 2005 Oct;11(10):621-8
references: 16232003
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):435-41
references: 15809411
references: CMAJ. 2002 Mar 19;166(6):737-45
references: 11944760
references: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Oct;74(4):388-400
references: 14534526
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 May-Jun;22(3):16-30
references: 12757268
references: JAMA. 2007 Jul 4;298(1):61-9
references: 17609491
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD005979
references: 16625648
references: Inquiry. 2005 Fall;42(3):293-310
references: 16353764