title: Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness.
abstract: In this article, we establish a new phenomenon of "inattentional deafness" and highlight the level of load on visual attention as a critical determinant of this phenomenon. In three experiments, we modified an inattentional blindness paradigm to assess inattentional deafness. Participants made either a low- or high-load visual discrimination concerning a cross shape (respectively, a discrimination of line color or of line length with a subtle length difference). A brief pure tone was presented simultaneously with the visual task display on a final trial. Failures to notice the presence of this tone (i.e., inattentional deafness) reached a rate of 79% in the high-visual-load condition, significantly more than in the low-load condition. These findings establish the phenomenon of inattentional deafness under visual load, thereby extending the load theory of attention (e.g., Lavie, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 25, 596-616, 1995) to address the cross-modal effects of visual perceptual load.
authors: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
authors: James S P
authors: JS
authors: Macdonald
authors: Nilli
authors: N
authors: Lavie
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):9-17
references: 11294235
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Jan;55(1):23-40
references: 11873849
references: Percept Psychophys. 2003 Feb;65(2):202-12
references: 12713239
references: Science. 1997 Nov 28;278(5343):1616-9
references: 9374459
references: Perception. 1999;28(9):1059-74
references: 10694957
references: Science. 1999 Dec 24;286(5449):2504-7
references: 10617465
references: Sci Am. 1968 Sep;219(3):204-14
references: 5674152
references: Cognition. 2007 Mar;102(3):321-40
references: 16480973
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1987 Nov;39(4):757-76
references: 3432594
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1078-91
references: 18823196
references: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Apr;67(3):444-57
references: 16119393
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Aug;59(8):1425-42
references: 16846969
references: Q J Exp Psychol. 1972 May;24(2):225-35
references: 5043119
references: Nature. 1997 Jun 19;387(6635):808-10
references: 9194561
references: J Vis. 2007 Dec 17;7(14):14.1-13
references: 18217809
references: Percept Psychophys. 1994 Aug;56(2):183-97
references: 7971119
references: Percept Psychophys. 2008 Apr;70(3):508-15
references: 18459262
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68
references: 7790827
references: Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(9):937-49
references: 11516446
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Aug;11(4):697-702
references: 15581120
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82
references: 15668100
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Feb;33(1):137-48
references: 17311484
references: Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):325-7
references: 15177806
references: Cognition. 2004 Aug;93(1):B27-38
references: 15110728
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Apr;7(2):275-85
references: 6453922
references: Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):217-42
references: 15631594
references: Percept Psychophys. 2003 Jul;65(5):817-28
references: 12956588
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):314-20
references: 16082812
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1346-58
references: 19803641