title: Cues to move increased information in superior colliculus tuning curves.
abstract: Shifts in the location of spatial attention produce increases in the gain and sensitivity of neuronal responses to sensory stimuli. Cues to shift the line of sight have the same effect on sensory responses in a motor area involved in the control of eye movements, the superior colliculus. Evidence has shown that shifts of gaze and shifts of attention are linked, suggesting there may be similar underlying mechanisms. Here, we report on a novel way in which cues to move the eyes (top-down signals) can influence sensory responses of neurons by altering the variability of their discharge rate. We measured the spatial tuning of superior colliculus neuronal activity in trials with cues to either make or withhold saccadic eye movements. We found that tuning curve widths both increased and decreased, but that the information conveyed by the neuronal discharge about the stimulus increased with a cue to make a saccade. The increase in information resulted partly from a decrease in trial-to-trial variability of neuronal discharges for stimuli located at the flanks of the tuning curves rather than from increases in the discharge rate for stimuli located at the peak of the tuning curves. This result is consistent with theoretical work and provides a novel way for cognitive signals to influence sensory responses within motor regions of the brain.
authors: Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
authors: Xiaobing
authors: X
authors: Li
authors: Michele A
authors: MA
authors: Basso
references: Science. 1986 Sep 26;233(4771):1416-9
references: 3749885
references: J Neurophysiol. 1957 Jul;20(4):408-34
references: 13439410
references: Brain Res. 1976 Aug 20;113(1):21-34
references: 821585
references: J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:574-91
references: 14403679
references: Vision Res. 1986;26(6):857-73
references: 3750869
references: J Neurophysiol. 1993 Sep;70(3):909-19
references: 8229178
references: Exp Brain Res. 1990;79(2):299-312
references: 2323377
references: J Neurophysiol. 1971 Sep;34(5):920-36
references: 4999593
references: Exp Brain Res. 1988;69(2):245-59
references: 3345806
references: Vision Res. 2003 Jul;43(15):1637-53
references: 12798146
references: Cereb Cortex. 2002 Mar;12(3):234-45
references: 11839598
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:611-47
references: 15217345
references: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2252-64
references: 16394072
references: J Neurosci. 1998 Sep 15;18(18):7519-34
references: 9736670
references: Neuron. 1999 Aug;23(4):765-73
references: 10482242
references: J Neurophysiol. 1972 Jul;35(4):575-86
references: 4624741
references: Neuron. 2007 Jul 5;55(1):131-41
references: 17610822
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Oct 26;25(43):10049-60
references: 16251454
references: Neural Comput. 1999 Jan 1;11(1):85-90
references: 9950723
references: Neuroscience. 1987 May;21(2):541-55
references: 3614643
references: Biol Cybern. 2001 Sep;85(3):159-65
references: 11561817
references: Physiol Rev. 1986 Jan;66(1):118-71
references: 3511480
references: J Neurosci. 1997 May 1;17(9):3201-14
references: 9096154
references: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Dec;12(12):1594-600
references: 19915566
references: J Neurophysiol. 1975 Mar;38(2):219-30
references: 1092813
references: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;80(3):1407-26
references: 9744949
references: Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1990;55:805-11
references: 2132856
references: Brain Res. 1975 Jun 6;90(1):147-52
references: 1131686
references: J Neurophysiol. 1972 Jul;35(4):560-74
references: 4624740
references: Vision Res. 1994 Jan;34(1):93-106
references: 8116272
references: Vision Res. 1972 Nov;12(11):1795-808
references: 4627952
references: J Appl Physiol. 1966 May;21(3):1068-70
references: 4958032
references: Exp Brain Res. 1992;88(2):389-400
references: 1577111
references: J Neurosci. 1999 Jan 1;19(1):431-41
references: 9870971
references: J Neurosci. 1993 Nov;13(11):4700-19
references: 8229193
references: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Nov;76(5):3573-7
references: 8930297
references: J Neurophysiol. 1976 Jul;39(4):745-65
references: 823303
references: J Neurophysiol. 1969 Sep;32(5):727-42
references: 4980023
references: J Neurosci. 1999 Mar 1;19(5):1736-53
references: 10024360
references: J Neurosci Methods. 1988 Dec;26(2):117-22
references: 3146006
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4561-77
references: 18434535
references: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Aug;4(8):826-31
references: 11477429
references: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Jun;73(6):2313-33
references: 7666141
references: Science. 1985 Aug 23;229(4715):782-4
references: 4023713
references: Science. 1988 Apr 15;240(4850):338-40
references: 3353728
references: J Neurophysiol. 1968 Mar;31(2):301-34
references: 4972033
references: J Neurophysiol. 1972 Mar;35(2):187-201
references: 4623918
references: PLoS Biol. 2006 Nov;4(12):e387
references: 17132045
references: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Mar;75(3):1306-8
references: 8867139
references: Exp Brain Res. 1993;95(3):429-35
references: 8224068
references: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec;88(6):3398-408
references: 12466456
references: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Aug;76(2):908-26
references: 8871208
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Dec 7;25(49):11357-73
references: 16339031
references: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1129-35
references: 15452579
references: Vision Res. 1998 Mar;38(6):895-909
references: 9624439
references: Nature. 1997 Aug 28;388(6645):871-4
references: 9278047
references: J Neurosci. 1997 Nov 1;17(21):8621-44
references: 9334433