title: Analysis of genomic variation in non-coding elements using population-scale sequencing data from the 1000 Genomes Project.
abstract: In the human genome, it has been estimated that considerably more sequence is under natural selection in non-coding regions [such as transcription-factor binding sites (TF-binding sites) and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs)] compared to protein-coding ones. However, less attention has been paid to them. To study selective pressure on non-coding elements, we use next-generation sequencing data from the recently completed pilot phase of the 1000 Genomes Project, which, compared to traditional methods, allows for the characterization of a full spectrum of genomic variations, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), short insertions and deletions (indels) and structural variations (SVs). We develop a framework for combining these variation data with non-coding elements, calculating various population-based metrics to compare classes and subclasses of elements, and developing element-aware aggregation procedures to probe the internal structure of an element. Overall, we find that TF-binding sites and ncRNAs are less selectively constrained for SNPs than coding sequences (CDSs), but more constrained than a neutral reference. We also determine that the relative amounts of constraint for the three types of variations are, in general, correlated, but there are some differences: counter-intuitively, TF-binding sites and ncRNAs are more selectively constrained for indels than for SNPs, compared to CDSs. After inspecting the overall properties of a class of elements, we analyze selective pressure on subclasses within an element class, and show that the extent of selection is associated with the genomic properties of each subclass. We find, for instance, that ncRNAs with higher expression levels tend to be under stronger purifying selection, and the actual regions of TF-binding motifs are under stronger selective pressure than the corresponding peak regions. Further, we develop element-aware aggregation plots to analyze selective pressure across the linear structure of an element, with the confidence intervals evaluated using both simple bootstrapping and block bootstrapping techniques. We find, for example, that both micro-RNAs (particularly the seed regions) and their binding targets are under stronger selective pressure for SNPs than their immediate genomic surroundings. In addition, we demonstrate that substitutions in TF-binding motifs inversely correlate with site conservation, and SNPs unfavorable for motifs are under more selective constraints than favorable SNPs. Finally, to further investigate intra-element differences, we show that SVs have the tendency to use distinctive modes and mechanisms when they interact with genomic elements, such as enveloping whole gene(s) rather than disrupting them partially, as well as duplicating TF motifs in tandem.
authors: Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, W.M. Keck Foundation Biotechnology Resource Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
authors: Xinmeng Jasmine
authors: XJ
authors: Mu
authors: Zhi John
authors: ZJ
authors: Lu
authors: Yong
authors: Y
authors: Kong
authors: Hugo Y K
authors: HY
authors: Lam
authors: Mark B
authors: MB
authors: Gerstein
references: Hum Mutat. 2003 Jan;21(1):28-44
references: 12497629
references: Nat Genet. 2009 Feb;41(2):211-5
references: 19169253
references: Trends Genet. 2005 May;21(5):289-97
references: 15851066
references: Nature. 2010 Sep 2;467(7311):52-8
references: 20811451
references: Nature. 2008 May 1;453(7191):56-64
references: 18451855
references: Nat Genet. 2008 Jul;40(7):827-34
references: 18583979
references: Nature. 2002 Dec 5;420(6915):520-62
references: 12466850
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Aug;11(8):559-71
references: 20628352
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Sep 15;31(18):5338-48
references: 12954770
references: Science. 2010 Apr 9;328(5975):235-9
references: 20299549
references: Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005 Feb;16(1):39-47
references: 15659338
references: Nature. 2008 Apr 17;452(7189):872-6
references: 18421352
references: Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652-4
references: 1904993
references: Nature. 2010 Apr 1;464(7289):704-12
references: 19812545
references: Nature. 2010 Oct 28;467(7319):1061-73
references: 20981092
references: Nature. 2007 Jun 14;447(7146):799-816
references: 17571346
references: Genome Biol. 2006;7 Suppl 1:S4.1-9
references: 16925838
references: Nature. 2010 Jun 24;465(7301):1033-8
references: 20577206
references: Science. 2005 Mar 4;307(5714):1434-40
references: 15637236
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr;3(4):299-309
references: 11967554
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 21;106(29):12031-6
references: 19597142
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Jan;28(1):47-55
references: 20037582
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D93-7
references: 18984615
references: Hum Mutat. 2005 Sep;26(3):205-13
references: 16086312
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Jan;27(1):66-75
references: 19122651
references: PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep 4;5(10):e254
references: 17803354
references: Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):928-33
references: 11237013
references: Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1622-9
references: 19470904
references: Genome Res. 2003 Oct;13(10):2229-35
references: 14525925
references: Genome Res. 2008 Dec;18(12):1865-74
references: 18842824
references: Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004 Aug;14(4):328-35
references: 15261647
references: Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Mar;84(3):316-27
references: 19232555
references: Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):60-5
references: 18987735
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D800-6
references: 21045057
references: Genome Biol. 2008;9(9):R137
references: 18798982
references: Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):996-1006
references: 12045153
references: Genetics. 2004 Sep;168(1):373-81
references: 15454550
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3639-44
references: 20139302
references: Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):851-61
references: 17943122
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Apr 28;33(8):2374-83
references: 15860774
references: Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):786
references: 17082449
references: Nat Genet. 2008 Sep;40(9):1107-12
references: 19165925
references: Nature. 2011 Feb 3;470(7332):59-65
references: 21293372
references: Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921
references: 11237011
references: Science. 2010 Apr 9;328(5975):232-5
references: 20299548
references: Science. 2007 Oct 19;318(5849):420-6
references: 17901297
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D55-60
references: 17099229
references: Science. 2007 Jun 8;316(5830):1497-502
references: 17540862
references: PLoS Biol. 2011 Apr;9(4):e1001046
references: 21526222
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Aug;10(8):551-64
references: 19597530
references: Nature. 2009 Feb 12;457(7231):915-9
references: 19098893