title: When flavor guides motor control: an effector independence study.
abstract: Research on multisensory integration during natural tasks has revealed how chemical senses contribute to plan and control movements. An aspect which has yet to be investigated regards whether the motor representations evoked by chemosensory stimuli, once established for a particular movement, can be used to control different effectors. Here, we investigate this issue by asking participants to drink a sip of flavored solution, grasp with the hand a visual target, and then bring it to the mouth, miming the action of biting. Results show that hand and lip apertures were scaled according to the size of the object evoked by the flavor. Maximum hand and lip apertures were greater when the action toward a small visual target (e.g., strawberry) was preceded by a sip of a "large" (e.g., orange) than a "small" (e.g., almond) flavor solution. Conversely, maximum hand and lip apertures were smaller when the action toward a large visual target (e.g., apple) was preceded by the presentation of a "small" (e.g., strawberry) rather than a "large" flavor solution. These findings support previous evidence on the presence of a unique motor plan underlying the act of grasping with-the-hand and with-the-mouth, extending the knowledge of chemosensorimotor transformations to motor equivalence.
authors: Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia, 8, 35131, Padova, Italy.
authors: Valentina
authors: V
authors: Parma
authors: Roberto
authors: R
authors: Roverato
authors: Deborah
authors: D
authors: Ghirardello
authors: Maria
authors: M
authors: Bulgheroni
authors: Roberto
authors: R
authors: Tirindelli
authors: Umberto
authors: U
authors: Castiello
references: PLoS One. 2010 Aug 17;5(8):e12240
references: 20808929
references: Neuroreport. 1999 Aug 20;10(12):2619-23
references: 10574380
references: Appetite. 2011 Apr;56(2):249-54
references: 21182884
references: Exp Brain Res. 1988;71(3):491-507
references: 3416965
references: Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):476-82
references: 18466409
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):924-31
references: 15000540
references: Phonetica. 1976;33(3):199-221
references: 996113
references: J Comp Neurol. 1993 Oct 8;336(2):211-28
references: 7503997
references: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Aug;17(8):1979-86
references: 17077160
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1385-93
references: 9770231
references: Neuron. 2003 Jul 17;39(2):375-86
references: 12873392
references: Soc Neurosci. 2011;6(1):31-47
references: 20379900
references: PLoS One. 2008 Mar 19;3(3):e1795
references: 18350137
references: J Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;86(4):1685-99
references: 11600632
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun;10(6):278-85
references: 16713325
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Jul;3(7):264-271
references: 10377541
references: Neuroreport. 1998 Mar 30;9(5):887-91
references: 9579685
references: Exp Brain Res. 2006 Apr;170(4):532-42
references: 16307260
references: Ciba Found Symp. 1987;132:171-86
references: 3322714
references: Exp Brain Res. 1987;67(1):220-4
references: 3622679
references: Sci Am. 1972 May;226(5):30-7
references: 4260739
references: Exp Brain Res. 2001 Jun;138(4):432-7
references: 11465740
references: Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jun 3;161(1):95-101
references: 15904715
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Mar;82(1-3):53-68
references: 8475776
references: Chem Senses. 2008 Jun;33(5):433-40
references: 18344564
references: Curr Biol. 2000 Oct 19;10(20):R731-5
references: 11069095
references: Chem Senses. 2006 Sep;31(7):665-71
references: 16793857
references: Percept Psychophys. 2000 Aug;62(6):1265-71
references: 11019622
references: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(1):66-75
references: 16034571
references: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):220-42
references: 10731218
references: Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jul;115(3):552-6
references: 9262211