title: Clinical reasoning in massage therapy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Clinical reasoning has long been a valuable tool for health care practitioners, but it has been under-researched in the field of massage therapy. Case reports have been a useful method for exploring the clinical reasoning process in various fields of manual therapy and can provide a model for similar research in the field of massage therapy. A diagnostically challenging case concerning a client with low back pain serves as a guideline for examining the clinical reasoning process of a massage therapist.
  
  
  METHODS
  A two-part methodology was employed: Client profileReflective inquiry The inquiry included questions pertaining to beliefs about health problems; beliefs about the mechanisms of pain; medical conditions that could explain the client's symptoms; knowledge of the client's anatomy, assessment, and treatment choices; observations made during treatment; extent of experience in treating similar problems; and ability to recognize clinical patterns.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The clinical reasoning process of a massage therapist contributed to a differential diagnosis, which provided an explanation for the client's symptoms and led to a satisfactory treatment resolution.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The present report serves as an example of the value of clinical reasoning in the field of massage therapy, and the need for expanded research into its methods and applications. The results of such research could be beneficial in teaching the clinical reasoning process at both the introductory and the advanced levels of massage therapy education.
authors: Freshman (2008), Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, U.S.A.
authors: Kim
authors: K
authors: Lemoon
references: J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005 Dec;105(12):537-44
references: 16424463
references: Am J Occup Ther. 1991 Nov;45(11):988-96
references: 1793122
references: Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Oct;47(423):653-5
references: 9474832
references: Am Fam Physician. 2007 Jul 15;76(2):247-54
references: 17695569
references: Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Apr;49(4):349-53
references: 7785717
references: Am J Occup Ther. 1998 Feb;52(2):125-32
references: 9494633
references: Phys Ther. 2004 Apr;84(4):312-30; discussion 331-5
references: 15049726
references: Phys Ther. 2000 Jan;80(1):28-43; discussion 44-52
references: 10623958
references: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1997;2(2):173-184
references: 12386407
references: Mayo Clin Proc. 1999 Nov;74(11):1135-48
references: 10560603
references: AACN Clin Issues. 2001 Nov;12(4):482-90
references: 11759421
references: Man Ther. 2007 Feb;12(1):40-9
references: 16781185
references: Am Fam Physician. 2007 Jul 15;76(2):195-6, 202
references: 17695564
references: Clin J Pain. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):446-55
references: 16093751
references: Mayo Clin Proc. 1996 Jun;71(6):565-9
references: 8642885
references: J Rheumatol. 2002 Mar;29(3):557-63
references: 11908573
references: Phys Ther. 1992 Dec;72(12):875-84
references: 1454863
references: Am J Occup Ther. 1996 Sep;50(8):676-84
references: 8863941
references: BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006 Jun 23;6:24
references: 16796753
references: Curr Rev Pain. 2000;4(5):356-61
references: 10998744
references: Physiother Res Int. 2001;6(1):40-51
references: 11379255
references: J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 Sep;106(9):531-6
references: 17079522
references: Sports Med. 1998 Dec;26(6):395-413
references: 9885096
references: Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005 Feb;50(1):19-34
references: 15695007
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 15;19(10):1138-43
references: 8059269
references: Phys Ther. 1992 Dec;72(12):865-74
references: 1454862
references: Eur Spine J. 1994;3(1):22-7
references: 7874537
references: Phys Ther. 1992 Dec;72(12):843-52
references: 1454860
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 1987 Dec;58(6):655-7
references: 3442214
references: Phys Ther. 1999 Jun;79(6):591-9
references: 10372870