title: Evidence for unique threat-processing mechanisms in psychopathic and anxious individuals.
abstract: Behaviorally, psychopathy and anxiety display opposite patterns of threat sensitivity and response inhibition. However, it is unclear whether this is due to shared or to separate underlying processes. To address this question, we evaluated whether the threat sensitivity of psychopathic and anxious offenders relates to similar or different components of Gray and McNaughton's (2000) Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory using a sample of 87 prisoners and a task that crossed threat onset with attentional focus. Psychopathy was associated with significantly weaker fear-potentiated startle (FPS) under conditions that presented threat cues after alternative, goal-directed cues. Conversely, anxiety was associated with significantly stronger FPS when threat appeared first and was the focus of attention. Furthermore, these differences were statistically independent. The results suggest that the abnormal sensitivity to threat cues associated with psychopathy and anxiety relate to different underlying processes and have implications for understanding the relationship between low- and high-anxious psychopathy.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706, USA.
authors: Allison J
authors: AJ
authors: Lake
authors: Arielle R
authors: AR
authors: Baskin-Sommers
authors: Wen
authors: W
authors: Li
authors: John J
authors: JJ
authors: Curtin
authors: Joseph P
authors: JP
authors: Newman
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;13(4):160-6
references: 19285913
references: Psychol Assess. 2002 Jun;14(2):150-63
references: 12056077
references: Cogn Emot. 2002 May 1;16(3):355-379
references: 18273395
references: Psychophysiology. 1993 Sep;30(5):541-5
references: 8416082
references: Psychol Sci. 2011 Feb;22(2):226-34
references: 21245494
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jan;20(1):95-107
references: 17919076
references: Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):3-24
references: 8711015
references: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jul;17(7):1595-603
references: 16956980
references: Psychophysiology. 2005 Jan;42(1):1-15
references: 15720576
references: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):184-8
references: 14703573
references: Psychol Bull. 1984 Nov;96(3):465-90
references: 6393179
references: Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jan 1;67(1):66-70
references: 19793581
references: Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:167-95
references: 17716086
references: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jan;12(1):92-8
references: 19079249
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):699-705
references: 17680941
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 Feb;95(1):15-20
references: 3700842
references: Psychophysiology. 1980 Mar;17(2):87-104
references: 6103567
references: Psychophysiology. 2008 May;45(3):435-44
references: 18221443
references: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Feb;35(1):116-24
references: 12723786
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):681-700
references: 11757875
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Aug;107(3):527-32
references: 9715587
references: Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):716-36
references: 8255955
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 May;108(2):353-8
references: 10369046
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jun;72(6):1413-28
references: 9177023
references: J Pers Assess. 2002 Apr;78(2):334-47
references: 12067197
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Mar;7(1):18-24
references: 17598731
references: Behav Res Ther. 1998 Sep;36(9):809-48
references: 9701859
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1965 Dec;70(6):442-5
references: 5846428
references: Personal Disord. 2010 Oct;1(4):203-17
references: 21113415
references: Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98
references: 12934687