title: Scope for rotavirus vaccination in India: revisiting the scientific evidence.
abstract: Rotavirus vaccines have been developed to prevent deaths resulting from severe diarrhea of rotavirus origin. The use of vaccines as an intervention at scale to prevent and control the burden of rotavirus diarrhea is supported by the argument that prevailing public health measures such as hygiene and sanitation, breast feeding and use of ORS have failed to prevent severe dehydration resulting from diarrhea. The article reviews the existing evidence on the rationale of using rotavirus vaccine as against the feasibility of scaling it up in developing countries like India. The vaccines currently available may not cover the strains circulating in Indian population. The diversity of Rotavirus infection in the country is tremendous and since the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy data has not been collected for India, there is first a need to conduct studies to measure the extent of protection and cross-protection provided by the available vaccines for local strains, before venturing into Rotavirus vaccination program. The potential benefits of immunization have to be first vetted against the risks involved by the policymakers and other stakeholders.
authors: Department of Community Medicine, Maternal and Child Health, Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi, India. sutapa.bneogi@iiphd.org
authors: Sutapa Bandyopadhyay
authors: SB
authors: Neogi
authors: Habib
authors: H
authors: Hasan
authors: Kabir
authors: K
authors: Sheikh
authors: Sanjay
authors: S
authors: Zodpey
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jun;42(6):2541-7
references: 15184432
references: Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 May;9(5):565-72
references: 12737740
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jul;44(7):2468-74
references: 16825366
references: Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994 Aug;13(8):720-4
references: 7970972
references: Bull World Health Organ. 1985;63(4):757-72
references: 3878742
references: BMJ. 2009 Sep 25;339:b3482
references: 19783580
references: BMC Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 29;8:103
references: 18664280
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2410-4
references: 2853177
references: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008 Jan;21(1):198-208
references: 18202442
references: J Med Virol. 2002 May;67(1):101-5
references: 11920823
references: J Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1;192 Suppl 1:S120-6
references: 16088795
references: BMJ. 2004 Apr 3;328(7443):811-5
references: 15070639
references: Pediatrics. 1993 Nov;92(5):680-5
references: 8414854
references: BMJ. 2009 Sep 25;339:b3653
references: 19783581
references: J Infect Dis. 1983 Dec;148(6):1061-8
references: 6317767
references: Indian J Med Res. 2007 May;125(5):619-32
references: 17642497
references: Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;119(1):11-8
references: 17200266
references: Lancet. 2000 Feb 5;355(9202):451-5
references: 10841125
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(10):1246-55
references: 11100619