title: Bionomics of the malaria vector Anopheles farauti in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: issues for malaria elimination.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In the Solomon Islands, the Malaria Eradication Programmes of the 1970s virtually eliminated the malaria vectors: Anopheles punctulatus and Anopheles koliensis, both late night biting, endophagic species. However, the vector, Anopheles farauti, changed its behaviour to bite early in the evening outdoors. Thus, An. farauti mosquitoes were able to avoid insecticide exposure and still maintain transmission. Thirty years on and the Solomon Islands are planning for intensified malaria control and localized elimination; but little is currently known about the behaviour of the vectors and how they will respond to intensified control.
  
  
  METHODS
  In the elimination area, Temotu Province, standard entomological collection methods were conducted in typical coastal villages to determine the vector, its ecology, biting density, behaviour, longevity, and vector efficacy. These vector surveys were conducted pre-intervention and post-intervention following indoor residual spraying and distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Anopheles farauti was the only anopheline in Temotu Province. In 2008 (pre-intervention), this species occurred in moderate to high densities (19.5-78.5 bites/person/night) and expressed a tendency to bite outdoors, early in the night (peak biting time 6-8 pm). Surveys post intervention showed that there was little, if any, reduction in biting densities and no reduction in the longevity of the vector population. After adjusting for human behaviour, indoor biting was reduced from 57% pre-intervention to 40% post-intervention.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In an effort to learn from historical mistakes and develop successful elimination programmes, there is a need for implementing complimentary vector control tools that can target exophagic and early biting vectors. Intensified indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticide net use has further promoted the early, outdoor feeding behaviour of An. farauti in the Solomon Islands. Consequently, the effectiveness of IRS and the personal protection provided by bed nets is compromised. To achieve elimination, any residual transmission should be targeted using integrated vector control incorporating complementary tools such as larviciding and/or zooprophylaxis.
authors: National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Honiara, Solomon Islands. hbugoro@gmail.com
authors: Hugo
authors: H
authors: Bugoro
authors: Robert D
authors: RD
authors: Cooper
authors: Charles
authors: C
authors: Butafa
authors: Charles
authors: C
authors: Iro'ofa
authors: Donna O
authors: DO
authors: Mackenzie
authors: Cheng-Chen
authors: CC
authors: Chen
authors: Tanya L
authors: TL
authors: Russell
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Mar;82(3):415-9
references: 20207866
references: Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;10(8):545-55
references: 20637696
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989 Mar;40(3):229-34
references: 2929848
references: BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Nov 10;6:161
references: 17096840
references: Trop Dis Bull. 1952 Jun;49(6):569-86
references: 14958825
references: P N G Med J. 1986 Mar;29(1):19-26
references: 3463014
references: Med Vet Entomol. 1996 Apr;10(2):145-8
references: 8744706
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:371-91
references: 10761582
references: Med Vet Entomol. 2000 Sep;14(3):308-12
references: 11016439
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985 Nov;34(6):1048-54
references: 2422965
references: Med Vet Entomol. 1991 Oct;5(4):477-83
references: 1773125
references: Lancet. 2008 May 10;371(9624):1633-5
references: 18374409
references: Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1995 Oct;89(5):521-9
references: 7495366
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Aug;71(2 Suppl):214-23
references: 15331840
references: Malar J. 2010 Jul 26;9:218
references: 20659316
references: Med Vet Entomol. 1994 Oct;8(4):340-50
references: 7841489
references: J Med Entomol. 1975 Jan 10;11(6):677-87
references: 1123827
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984 Sep;33(5):783-8
references: 6385740
references: J Med Entomol. 1974 Jun 15;11(2):197-210
references: 4153131
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:53-70
references: 15355233
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000 May;62(5):535-44
references: 11289661
references: P N G Med J. 1975 Jun;18(2):124-5
references: 1061458
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Apr;103 Suppl 1:S2-5
references: 19062058
references: PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 6;4(11):e309
references: 17988171
references: Med Vet Entomol. 1987 Jul;1(3):319-27
references: 2979548
references: PLoS Med. 2010 Aug 10;7(8):
references: 20711482
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD006657
references: 20393950
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Apr;68(4 Suppl):16-22
references: 12749481
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000363
references: 10796535
references: Insect Mol Biol. 1999 Aug;8(3):381-90
references: 10469255