title: Could the health decline of prehistoric California indians be related to exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from natural bitumen?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The negative health effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are well established for modern human populations but have so far not been studied in prehistoric contexts. PAHs are the main component of fossil bitumen, a naturally occurring material used by past societies such as the Chumash Indians in California as an adhesive, as a waterproofing agent, and for medicinal purposes. The rich archaeological and ethnohistoric record of the coastal Chumash suggests that they were exposed to multiple uptake pathways of bituminous PAHs, including direct contact, fume inhalation, and oral uptake from contaminated water and seafood.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  We investigated the possibility that PAHs from natural bitumen compromised the health of the prehistoric Chumash Indians in California.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Exposure of the ancient Chumash Indians to toxic PAHs appears to have gradually increased across a period of 7,500 years because of an increased use of bitumen in the Chumash technology, together with a dietary shift toward PAH-contaminated marine food. Skeletal analysis indicates a concurrent population health decline that may be related to PAH uptake. However, establishing such a connection is virtually impossible without knowing the actual exposure levels experienced by these populations. Future methodological research may provide techniques for determining PAH levels in ancient skeletal material, which would open new avenues for research on the health of prehistoric populations and on the long-term effects of human PAH exposure.
authors: Sebastian K T S
authors: SK
authors: Wärmländer
authors: Sabrina B
authors: SB
authors: Sholts
authors: Jon M
authors: JM
authors: Erlandson
authors: Thor
authors: T
authors: Gjerdrum
authors: Roger
authors: R
authors: Westerholm
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 1992 Jun;88(2):135-44
references: 1605313
references: J Nutr. 2003 Aug;133(8):2629-34
references: 12888649
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Nov;114(11):1744-50
references: 17107862
references: J Forensic Sci. 2010 Jul;55(4):871-6
references: 20384925
references: Science. 2011 Mar 4;331(6021):1181-5
references: 21385713
references: Am Antiq. 1986;51(2):375-83
references: 11616484
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986 Mar;69(3):345-54
references: 3518481
references: Hum Biol. 1964 May;36:104-33
references: 14167587
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Mar 22;167(1):16-21
references: 16842949
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Sep;143(1):155-60
references: 20564519
references: Aquat Toxicol. 2003 Oct 29;65(2):159-69
references: 12946616
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2005 Jan 29;147(2-3):141-5
references: 15567618
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb 1;147(3):309-14
references: 9482506
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):7086-90
references: 21482755
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2001 May 1;35(9):1748-54
references: 11355188
references: Am Antiq. 2001 Oct;66(4):595-613
references: 20043375
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Jun;110 Suppl 3:451-88
references: 12060843
references: Am J Ind Med. 2000 Sep;38(3):244-54
references: 10940962
references: Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2010;23(4):339-46
references: 21306979
references: Science. 1970 Nov 27;170(3961):974-7
references: 17834612
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 1988 Jun;76(2):183-8
references: 3046371
references: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008 Jul;391(6):2235-48
references: 18521577
references: Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Nov;104(11):1166-70
references: 8959405
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Jun;139(2):109-25
references: 19280675
references: Environ Sci Technol. 1988 Aug 1;22(8):925-30
references: 22195714