title: Linear and non-linear dependencies between copy number aberrations and mRNA expression reveal distinct molecular pathways in breast cancer.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Elucidating the exact relationship between gene copy number and expression would enable identification of regulatory mechanisms of abnormal gene expression and biological pathways of regulation. Most current approaches either depend on linear correlation or on nonparametric tests of association that are insensitive to the exact shape of the relationship. Based on knowledge of enzyme kinetics and gene regulation, we would expect the functional shape of the relationship to be gene dependent and to be related to the gene regulatory mechanisms involved. Here, we propose a statistical approach to investigate and distinguish between linear and nonlinear dependences between DNA copy number alteration and mRNA expression.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We applied the proposed method to DNA copy numbers derived from Illumina 109 K SNP-CGH arrays (using the log R values) and expression data from Agilent 44 K mRNA arrays, focusing on commonly aberrated genomic loci in a collection of 102 breast tumors. Regression analysis was used to identify the type of relationship (linear or nonlinear), and subsequent pathway analysis revealed that genes displaying a linear relationship were overall associated with substantially different biological processes than genes displaying a nonlinear relationship. In the group of genes with a linear relationship, we found significant association to canonical pathways, including purine and pyrimidine metabolism (for both deletions and amplifications) as well as estrogen metabolism (linear amplification) and BRCA-related response to damage (linear deletion). In the group of genes displaying a nonlinear relationship, the top canonical pathways were specific pathways like PTEN and PI13K/AKT (nonlinear amplification) and Wnt(B) and IL-2 signalling (nonlinear deletion). Both amplifications and deletions pointed to the same affected pathways and identified cancer as the top significant disease and cell cycle, cell signaling and cellular development as significant networks.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This paper presents a novel approach to assessing the validity of the dependence of expression data on copy number data, and this approach may help in identifying the drivers of carcinogenesis.
authors: Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Montebello, and Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Science, University of Oslo, 0310 Oslo, Norway. hsolvang@rr-research.no
authors: Hiroko K
authors: HK
authors: Solvang
authors: Ole Christian
authors: OC
authors: Lingjærde
authors: Arnoldo
authors: A
authors: Frigessi
authors: Anne-Lise
authors: AL
authors: Børresen-Dale
authors: Vessela N
authors: VN
authors: Kristensen
references: Cell. 2010 Dec 10;143(6):1005-17
references: 21129771
references: Cancer Res. 2002 Nov 1;62(21):6240-5
references: 12414653
references: Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):530-6
references: 11823860
references: Genome Biol. 2007;8(10):R215
references: 17925008
references: Mol Oncol. 2007 Sep;1(2):160-71
references: 19383292
references: Bioinformatics. 2005 Mar;21(6):821-2
references: 15531610
references: Bioinformatics. 2008 Apr 1;24(7):889-96
references: 18263644
references: Biostatistics. 2009 Jul;10(3):515-34
references: 19377034
references: BMC Syst Biol. 2010 May 17;4:67
references: 20478067
references: Oncogene. 2010 Apr 8;29(14):2013-23
references: 20101236
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 1;99(20):12963-8
references: 12297621
references: Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;25(24):3228-35
references: 19828576
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10869-74
references: 11553815
references: BMC Genomics. 2008 Aug 08;9:379
references: 18691401
references: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;593:117-33
references: 17265722
references: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jun;121(3):575-89
references: 19688261
references: Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(4):R55
references: 19638211
references: Biometrics. 2009 Mar;65(1):19-29
references: 18479479