title: Muscle repositioning: combining subjective and objective feedbacks in the teaching and practice of a reflex-based myofascial release technique.
abstract: Muscle Repositioning (MR) is a new style of myofascial release that elicits involuntary motor reactions detectable by electromyography. This article describes the principal theoretical and practical concepts of MR, and summarizes a workshop presented October 31, 2009, after the Second International Fascia Research Congress, held at Vrije Universitiet, Amsterdam.The manual mechanical input of MR integrates the client's body segments into a block, which is evident as a result of the diagnostic manual oscillations the practitioner imparts to the client's body. Segmental integration is achieved when the client's body responds as a unit to the oscillatory assessment. It appears that manually sustaining the condition of segmental integration evokes involuntary muscle reactions, which reactions might correspond to mechanisms that maintain homeostasis, such as pandiculation. It might be that these reactions are part of the MR mechanism of action and underlie its clinically observed efficacy in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders.For the practitioner and the client alike, segmental integration provides unique sensations. In teaching MR, these paired sensations can be used as kinesthetic feedback resources, because quality of touch can be guided by the client's reported sensations, which should match the practitioner's sensations. Another form of feedback with respect to quality of touch is the visually discernable degree of segmental integration. Finally, because the involuntary motor activity elicited by the MR touch can be objectively monitored through electromyography and possibly other instrumented measurements, the MR approach might yield objectivity, precision, and reproducibility-features seldom found in manual therapies.
authors: Associação Brasileira de Rolfing, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.
authors: Luiz Fernando
authors: LF
authors: Bertolucci
references: Nature. 1977 May 19;267(5608):261-2
references: 865617
references: Spine J. 2006 Mar-Apr;6(2):138-45
references: 16517384
references: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Mar-Apr;26(3):131-8
references: 12704305
references: Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2003 Dec;10(6):330-41
references: 14707482
references: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Mar-Apr;23(3):155-9
references: 10771499
references: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Nov-Dec;26(9):579-91
references: 14673407
references: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jun;29(5):378-85
references: 16762666
references: Eur J Pharmacol. 1999 Jun 30;375(1-3):1-11
references: 10443560
references: Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2004 Aug;25(4):235-51
references: 15361811
references: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Nov-Dec;26(9):539-48
references: 14673403
references: J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2008 Jul;12(3):213-24
references: 19083677
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):198-207
references: 21331826
references: Perspect Biol Med. 2002 Summer;45(3):319-28
references: 12114827
references: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002 Jun;12(3):219-34
references: 12086817
references: J Mot Behav. 1990 Dec;22(4):536-52
references: 15117661
references: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Mar;94(3):1092-107
references: 12571138
references: Med Hypotheses. 2006;67(1):6-14
references: 16520004
references: Bull Menninger Clin. 1979 Mar;43(2):123-6
references: 435660
references: Eur J Pharmacol. 1998 Dec 4;362(2-3):95-101
references: 9874158
references: Med Sci Monit. 2004 Jun;10(6):MS6-17
references: 15173679
references: Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999 Mar;38(3):267-74
references: 10325666
references: Am J Occup Ther. 1991 Jun;45(6):531-7
references: 2063942
references: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Sep;28(7):465-71
references: 16182019
references: Brain Res Bull. 2000 Mar 15;51(5):425-31
references: 10715564
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Dec 1;23(23):2552-62
references: 9854754
references: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Nov-Dec;26(9):549-56
references: 14673404