title: Breast reconstruction after breast cancer.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the mental, emotional, and physical benefits of reconstruction in breast cancer patients. 2. Compare the most common techniques of reconstruction in patients and detail benefits and risks associated with each. 3. Outline different methods of reconstruction and identify the method considered best for the patient based on timing of the procedures, body type, adjuvant therapies, and other coexisting conditions. 4. Distinguish between some of the different flaps that can be considered for autologous reconstruction.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Breast cancer is unfortunately a common disease affecting millions of women, often at a relatively young age. Reconstruction following mastectomy offers women an opportunity to mollify some of the emotional and aesthetic effects of this devastating disease. Although varying techniques of alloplastic and autologous techniques are available, all strive to achieve the same goal: the satisfactory reformation of a breast mound that appears as natural as possible without clothing and at the very least is normal in appearance under clothing. This article summarizes the various approaches to breast reconstruction and offers a balanced view of the risks and benefits of each, all of which in the end offer the opportunity for excellent and predictable results with a high degree of patient satisfaction.
authors: Philadelphia, Pa.; and New York, N.Y. From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System; the Department of General Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; and Division of Plastic Surgery, Pennsylvania Hospital.
authors: Joseph M
authors: JM
authors: Serletti
authors: Joshua
authors: J
authors: Fosnot
authors: Jonas A
authors: JA
authors: Nelson
authors: Joseph J
authors: JJ
authors: Disa
authors: Louis P
authors: LP
authors: Bucky
references: De Angelis R, Tavilla A, Verdecchia A, et al. Breast cancer survivors in the United States: Geographic variability and time trends, 2005-2015. Cancer 2009;115:1954–1966.
references: Wang HT, Barone CM, Steigelman MB, et al. Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;28:165–170.
references: Rouanet P, Fabre JM, Tica V, Anaf V, Jozwick M, Pujol H. Chest wall reconstruction for radionecrosis after breast carcinoma therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34:465–470.
references: Metcalfe KA, Lubinski J, Ghadirian P, et al. Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: The Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1093–1097.
references: Murphy RX Jr, Adkinson JM, Namey T, Eid S, Bleznak A. Surgical and financial implications of genetic counseling and requests for concurrent prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:684–687.
references: Soltanian H, Okada H. Understanding genetic analysis for breast cancer and its implications for plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;28:85–91.
references: Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–1367.
references: Stucky CC, Gray RJ, Wasif N, Dueck AC, Pockaj BA. Increase in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: Echoes of a bygone era? Surgical trends for unilateral breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(Suppl 3):330–337.
references: Sarwer DB. Psychological Aspects of Reconstructive and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: Clinical, Empirical, and Ethical Perspectives. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
references: Guyomard V, Leinster S, Wilkinson M. Systematic review of studies of patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast 2007;16:547–567.
references: Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, Wilkins EG. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:7–12.
references: Lee C, Sunu C, Pignone M. Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;209:123–133.
references: Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1585–1595.
references: Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;124:1–8.
references: Spear SL, Newman MK, Bedford MS, Schwartz KA, Cohen M, Schwartz JS. A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:340–347.
references: Nahabedian MY. Breast reconstruction: A review and rationale for patient selection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:55–62.
references: Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: Part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:832–839.
references: Chen CM, Disa JJ, Sacchini V, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1772–1780.
references: Bailey MH, Smith JW, Casas L, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction: Reducing the risks. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:845–851.
references: Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: Recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:930–942.
references: Collis N, Sharpe DT. Breast reconstruction by tissue expansion: A retrospective technical review of 197 two-stage delayed reconstructions following mastectomy for malignant breast disease in 189 patients. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:37–41.
references: Yeh KA, Lyle G, Wei JP, Sherry R. Immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer: Morbidity and outcome. Am Surg. 1998;64:1195–1199.
references: McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: An outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1886–1892.
references: Namnoum JD. Expander/implant reconstruction with AlloDerm: Recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:387–394.
references: Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232–239.
references: Pomahac B, Recht A, May JW, Hergrueter CA, Slavin SA. New trends in breast cancer management: Is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing? Ann Surg. 2006;244:282–288.
references: Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: A head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1735–1740.
references: Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1743–1753.
references: Yii NW, Khoo CT. Salvage of infected expander prostheses in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1087–1092.
references: Antony AK, Mehrara BM, McCarthy CM, et al. Salvage of tissue expander in the setting of mastectomy flap necrosis: A 13-year experience using timed excision with continued expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:356–363.
references: Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:216–225.
references: Fujino T, Harashina T, Enomoto K. Primary breast reconstruction after a standard radical mastectomy by a free flap transfer: Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58:371–374.
references: Tønseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, Abyholm FE, Stavem K. Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1188–1194.
references: Carlson GW, Page AL, Peters K, Ashinoff R, Schaefer T, Losken A. Effects of radiation therapy on pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:568–572.
references: Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: A critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:395–408.
references: Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: Current issues. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:950–960.
references: Motwani SB, Strom EA, Schechter NR, et al. The impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the technical delivery of postmastectomy radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:76–82.
references: Kronowitz SJ, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, et al. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1617–1628.
references: Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: Experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67:177–187.
references: Wong C, Saint-Cyr M, Mojallal A, et al. Perforasomes of the DIEP flap: Vascular anatomy of the lateral versus medial row perforators and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:772–782.
references: Stern HS, Nahai F. The versatile superficial inferior epigastric artery free flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45:270–274.
references: Uraloğlu M, Kerem M, Arpac E. Arterial and venous anatomy of deep inferior epigastric perforator and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1883.
references: Codner MA, Nahai F. The gluteal free flap breast reconstruction: Making it work. Clin Plast Surg. 1994;21:289–296.
references: Shaw WW. Superior gluteal free flap breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 1998;25:267–274.
references: Allen RJ, Tucker C Jr. Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:1207–1212.
references: Boustred AM, Nahai F. Inferior gluteal free flap breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 1998;25:275–282.
references: Sullivan SR, Fletcher DR, Isom CD, Isik FF. True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:19–28.
references: Selber JC, Kurichi JE, Vega SJ, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM. Risk factors and complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:492–497.
references: Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: A meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:752–764.
references: Andrades P, Fix RJ, Danilla S, et al. Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:562–567.
references: Kanchwala SK, Bucky LP. Optimizing pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Cancer J. 2008;14:236–240.
references: Codner MA, Bostwick J III, Nahai F, Bried JT, Eaves FF. TRAM flap vascular delay for high-risk breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1615–1622.
references: Atisha D, Alderman AK. A systematic review of abdominal wall function following abdominal flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:222–230.
references: Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part I. Unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1142–1153.
references: Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1438–1453.
references: Wu LC, Bajaj A, Chang DW, Chevray PM. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:702–709.
references: Williams EH, Rosenberg LZ, Kolm P, de la Torre JI, Fix RJ. Immediate nipple reconstruction on a free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1115–1124.
references: Patani N, Mokbel K. Oncological and aesthetic considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:391–403.
references: Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: An extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–468.
references: Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: An 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–829.
references: Lee JM, Georgian-Smith D, Gazelle GS, et al. Detecting nonpalpable recurrent breast cancer: The role of routine mammographic screening of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstructions. Radiology 2008;248:398–405.
references: Helvie MA, Bailey JE, Roubidoux MA, et al. Mammographic screening of TRAM flap breast reconstructions for detection of nonpalpable recurrent cancer. Radiology 2002;224:211–216.
references: Edeiken BS, Fornage BD, Bedi DG, Sneige N, Parulekar SG, Pleasure J. Recurrence in autogenous myocutaneous flap reconstruction after mastectomy for primary breast cancer: US diagnosis. Radiology 2003;227:542–548.