title: [Biomechanical characteristics of human fetal membranes. Preterm fetal membranes are stronger than term fetal membranes].
abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical characteristics of human fetal membranes (FM) throughout gestation. Biomechanical properties were determined for 115 FM of 23-41 weeks gestation using our previously described methodology. The areas of membrane immediately adjacent to the strongest and weakest tested spots were sampled for histomorphometric analysis. Clinical data on the patients whose FM were examined were also collected. FM less than 28 weeks gestation were associated with higher incidence of abruption and chorioamnionitis. Topographically FM at all gestations had heterogeneous biomechanical characteristics over their surfaces with distinct weak areas. The most premature membranes were the strongest. FM strength represented by rupture force and work to rupture decreased with increasing gestation in both weak and strong regions of FM. This decrease in FM strength was most dramatic at more than 38 weeks gestation. The FM component amnion-chorion sublayers were thinner in the weak areas compared to strong areas. Compared to term FM, preterm FM are stronger but have similar heterogeneous weak and strong areas. Following a gradual increase in FM weakness with increasing gestation, there is a major drop-off at term 38 weeks gestation. The FM weak areas are thinner than the stronger areas. Whether the difference in thickness is enough to account for the strength differences is unknown.
authors: Department of pediatrics, MetroHealth medical center, Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth-Drive, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
authors: N
authors: N
authors: Rangaswamy
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Abdelrahim
authors: R M
authors: RM
authors: Moore
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Uyen
authors: B M
authors: BM
authors: Mercer
authors: J M
authors: JM
authors: Mansour
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Kumar
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Sawady
authors: J J
authors: JJ
authors: Moore
references: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(6):590-600
references: 18568457
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;187(3):672-5
references: 12237646
references: Placenta. 2010 Jan;31(1):18-24
references: 19922998
references: Placenta. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(11-12):1037-51
references: 16516962
references: Hum Reprod. 1999 Jan;14(1):237-41
references: 10374127
references: Biol Reprod. 2005 Mar;72(3):720-6
references: 15548732
references: Hum Reprod. 1999 Nov;14(11):2895-900
references: 10548644
references: J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2004 Oct;11(7):427-37
references: 15458739
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;195(2):510-5
references: 16647685
references: Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;34(4):702-14
references: 1778012
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;194(1):211-7
references: 16389034
references: Placenta. 2009 Jun;30(6):560-3
references: 19410292
references: J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006 Apr;13(3):191-5
references: 16638590
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;101(1):178-93
references: 12517665