title: Primary prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and large-for-gestational-age newborns by lifestyle counseling: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Our objective was to examine whether gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or newborns' high birthweight can be prevented by lifestyle counseling in pregnant women at high risk of GDM.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We conducted a cluster-randomized trial, the NELLI study, in 14 municipalities in Finland, where 2,271 women were screened by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 8-12 wk gestation. Euglycemic (n = 399) women with at least one GDM risk factor (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25 kg/m(2), glucose intolerance or newborn's macrosomia (≥ 4,500 g) in any earlier pregnancy, family history of diabetes, age ≥ 40 y) were included. The intervention included individual intensified counseling on physical activity and diet and weight gain at five antenatal visits. Primary outcomes were incidence of GDM as assessed by OGTT (maternal outcome) and newborns' birthweight adjusted for gestational age (neonatal outcome). Secondary outcomes were maternal weight gain and the need for insulin treatment during pregnancy. Adherence to the intervention was evaluated on the basis of changes in physical activity (weekly metabolic equivalent task (MET) minutes) and diet (intake of total fat, saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, saccharose, and fiber). Multilevel analyses took into account cluster, maternity clinic, and nurse level influences in addition to age, education, parity, and prepregnancy BMI. 15.8% (34/216) of women in the intervention group and 12.4% (22/179) in the usual care group developed GDM (absolute effect size 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-2.62, p = 0.36). Neonatal birthweight was lower in the intervention than in the usual care group (absolute effect size -133 g, 95% CI -231 to -35, p = 0.008) as was proportion of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) newborns (26/216, 12.1% versus 34/179, 19.7%, p = 0.042). Women in the intervention group increased their intake of dietary fiber (adjusted coefficient 1.83, 95% CI 0.30-3.25, p = 0.023) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (adjusted coefficient 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.57, p < 0.001), decreased their intake of saturated fatty acids (adjusted coefficient -0.63, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.15, p = 0.01) and intake of saccharose (adjusted coefficient -0.83, 95% CI -1.55 to -0.11, p  =  0.023), and had a tendency to a smaller decrease in MET minutes/week for at least moderate intensity activity (adjusted coefficient 91, 95% CI -37 to 219, p = 0.17) than women in the usual care group. In subgroup analysis, adherent women in the intervention group (n = 55/229) had decreased risk of GDM (27.3% versus 33.0%, p = 0.43) and LGA newborns (7.3% versus 19.5%, p = 0.03) compared to women in the usual care group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The intervention was effective in controlling birthweight of the newborns, but failed to have an effect on maternal GDM.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN33885819. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
authors: UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland. riitta.luoto@uta.fi
authors: Riitta
authors: R
authors: Luoto
authors: Tarja I
authors: TI
authors: Kinnunen
authors: Minna
authors: M
authors: Aittasalo
authors: Päivi
authors: P
authors: Kolu
authors: Jani
authors: J
authors: Raitanen
authors: Katriina
authors: K
authors: Ojala
authors: Kirsi
authors: K
authors: Mansikkamäki
authors: Satu
authors: S
authors: Lamberg
authors: Tommi
authors: T
authors: Vasankari
authors: Tanja
authors: T
authors: Komulainen
authors: Sirkku
authors: S
authors: Tulokas
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jan;99(1):171-3
references: 11777528
references: J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jan;7(1):109-18
references: 20231762
references: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jun;18(6):851-9
references: 19514827
references: Diabetes Care. 2000 Apr;23(4):460-4
references: 10857935
references: Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2010 Jan;26(1):17-25
references: 19943327
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct;92(4):678-87
references: 20668049
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jul;61(7):884-91
references: 17228348
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 May;38(5):989-1006
references: 16672855
references: BMJ. 2010 Apr 01;340:c1395
references: 20360215
references: N Engl J Med. 2001 May 3;344(18):1343-50
references: 11333990
references: Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1:S62-9
references: 20042775
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):597-604
references: 20177292
references: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Aug 03;10:39
references: 20682023
references: N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2477-86
references: 15951574
references: N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1339-48
references: 19797280
references: N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):1991-2002
references: 18463375
references: BMC Womens Health. 2008 Aug 14;8:14
references: 18702803
references: Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):223-9
references: 20876206
references: Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):E35
references: 11483845
references: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Jul;94(7):2464-70
references: 19417040
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Sep 1;154(5):466-76
references: 11532789
references: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Jan 05;9:1
references: 19123930
references: Br J Sports Med. 2003 Feb;37(1):6-12; discussion 12
references: 12547738
references: Diabetes Care. 2004 Jun;27(6):1487-95
references: 15161807
references: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 May;95(5):2080-8
references: 20335449
references: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 Jul 30;8:31
references: 18664297
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Mar;79(3):479-86
references: 14985225
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD006674
references: 18425961
references: Diabetes Care. 2007 Jul;30 Suppl 2:S141-6
references: 17596462
references: Circulation. 2007 Aug 28;116(9):1081-93
references: 17671237
references: Diabetologia. 2001 Aug;44(8):972-8
references: 11484073