title: Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Ensuring successful follow-up is essential when conducting a prospective cohort study. Most existing literature reviewing methods to ensure a high response rate is based on experience in developed nations.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We report our 4-year follow-up success for a national cohort study examining the health transition underway in Thailand. We began the cohort study in 2005 with a baseline postal questionnaire sent to all 200,000 Thais enrolled as distance learning students at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University and residing all over Thailand; 87,134 or 44% of the students responded. Subsequently we used University and national media to inform cohort members of study progress. Also, we prepared a health book with study results and health advice which was distributed to all cohort members. After 4 years we repeated the survey and achieved a 71% response rate. In this paper we report the methods used to achieve this responseThe initial follow-up mail-out generated a response rate of about 48% reflecting the extensive preparatory work between baseline and follow-up. After 4 rounds of telephone contact (more than 100,000 phone calls) and 4 related mail-out rounds progressively over 16 months an overall response rate was achieved of just over 71% (n = 60,774). The total cost was US$4.06/respondent - 19% for printing, 21% for postage, 14% for tape measures (included in mail-out), 18% for data processing 22% for prizes and 6% for telephone.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Many of the methods reported as effective for mail questionnaire and cohort response rates held true for Thailand. These included being associated with a university, incentivating cooperation, follow-up contact, providing a second copy of questionnaire where necessary, and assurance of confidentiality. Telephone contact with the cohort and the small prizes given to responders were particularly important in the Thai context as was Thai leadership of the research team.
authors: National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. matthew.kelly@anu.edu.au.
authors: Sam-Ang
authors: SA
authors: Seubsman
authors: Matthew
authors: M
authors: Kelly
authors: Adrian
authors: A
authors: Sleigh
authors: Janya
authors: J
authors: Peungson
authors: Jaruwan
authors: J
authors: Chokkanapitak
authors: Duangkae
authors: D
authors: Vilainerun
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):941-7
references: 17881411
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;38(1):53-60
references: 18202083
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Jun;32(3):461-8
references: 12777437
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):531-5
references: 2037857
references: Nurs Res. 1990 May-Jun;39(3):184-6
references: 2342908
references: BMC Infect Dis. 2003 Oct 28;3:25
references: 14580265
references: Sex Transm Infect. 1999 Feb;75(1):30-5
references: 10448339
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;50(10):1129-36
references: 9368521
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):MR000008
references: 19588449
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;34(5):987-91
references: 15894591
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;37(2):266-72
references: 17911153
references: JAMA. 2004 May 12;291(18):2212-20
references: 15138243
references: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000 May 20;16(8):699-707
references: 10826476
references: Epidemiol Rev. 1998;20(1):57-70
references: 9762509