title: Mandible reconstruction with patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of a transfer key method to the standard method--results of an in vitro study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Patient-specific mandible reconstruction plates may be pre-bent to facilitate the surgical procedure. A method using transfer keys (TK) for repositioning pre-bent plates was compared with the standard method on mandibular models to evaluate its feasibility.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ten mandible models were used to pre-bend reconstruction plates. After plate fixing on the models, TK were fabricated. Plates and TK were removed and segmental resections were performed. The plates were replaced on the models by the standard method of determining the plate position using previous screw holes. Plates were removed and then relocated by use of the TK. To compare the accuracy of both methods, the distances between four corresponding points of the condyles and the mandibular rami were measured.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean deviation of the absolute values from the initial values for the models between the condyles and the rami was 0.964 mm for the standard method and 0.821 mm for the TK method. To determine whether there was enlargement or shrinkage between the rami or the condyles, we analysed the relative values of the data. For the standard method, the mean deviation from the initial values was +0.178 mm; for the TK method, it was +0.080 mm. In both cases, the differences were not significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Pre-bent reconstruction plates using patient-specific 3D models can be useful in mandible reconstruction. The TK method was tested in vitro and shown to be as accurate as the standard method. The TK method may shorten the procedure and may be useful for secondary cases and cases where the pathology involves the outer corte of the mandible.
authors: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm and Academic Hospital Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. dr.frankwilde@yahoo.de
authors: Frank
authors: F
authors: Wilde
authors: Marcus
authors: M
authors: Plail
authors: Christoph
authors: C
authors: Riese
authors: Alexander
authors: A
authors: Schramm
authors: Karsten
authors: K
authors: Winter
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Nov;59(11):1374-5
references: 11688048
references: Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2010 Dec;3(4):201-8
references: 22132258
references: Head Face Med. 2007 Jan 15;3:5
references: 17224060
references: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jun;133(6):603-7
references: 17576912
references: Head Neck. 1991 May-Jun;13(3):191-9
references: 2037470
references: Laryngoscope. 2002 Sep;112(9):1569-73
references: 12352664
references: Am J Surg. 1990 Oct;160(4):387-9
references: 2221239
references: Laryngoscope. 1994 Apr;104(4):433-9
references: 8164482
references: Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;16(1):133-46, vii
references: 18063252
references: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Aug;42(4):354-6
references: 15225958
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Mar;58(3):349-51
references: 10716123
references: Ann Plast Surg. 1993 Aug;31(2):128-33
references: 8215127
references: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jul;47(5):399-400
references: 19027999
references: J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998 Dec;26(6):360-2
references: 10036651
references: Laryngoscope. 1998 Mar;108(3):448-51
references: 9504624