title: Rare gene capture in predominantly androgenetic species.
abstract: The long-term persistence of completely asexual species is unexpected. Although asexuality has short-term evolutionary advantages, a lack of genetic recombination leads to the accumulation over time of deleterious mutations. The loss of individual fitness as a result of accumulated deleterious mutations is expected to lead to reduced population fitness and possible lineage extinction. Persistent lineages of asexual, all-female clones (parthenogenetic and gynogenetic species) avoid the negative effects of asexual reproduction through the production of rare males, or otherwise exhibit some degree of genetic recombination. Another form of asexuality, known as androgenesis, results in offspring that are clones of the male parent. Several species of the Asian clam genus Corbicula reproduce via androgenesis. We compared gene trees of mitochondrial and nuclear loci from multiple sexual and androgenetic species across the global distribution of Corbicula to test the hypothesis of long-term clonality of the androgenetic species. Our results indicate that low levels of genetic capture of maternal nuclear DNA from other species occur within otherwise androgenetic lineages of Corbicula. The rare capture of genetic material from other species may allow androgenetic lineages of Corbicula to mitigate the effects of deleterious mutation accumulation and increase potentially adaptive variation. Models comparing the relative advantages and disadvantages of sexual and asexual reproduction should consider the possibility of rare genetic recombination, because such events seem to be nearly ubiquitous among otherwise asexual species.
authors: Section of Integrative Biology and Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. shannon.hedtke@gmail.com
authors: Shannon M
authors: SM
authors: Hedtke
authors: Matthias
authors: M
authors: Glaubrecht
authors: David M
authors: DM
authors: Hillis
references: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jan;23(1):140-59
references: 20065328
references: Nature. 2006 Sep 7;443(7107):89-92
references: 16957730
references: Evolution. 2005 Apr;59(4):800-13
references: 15926690
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Feb;11(2):46-52
references: 21237760
references: Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;106(2-4):189-94
references: 15292590
references: Biol Bull. 1997 Dec;193(3):320-323
references: 28574770
references: Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):427-37
references: 8878706
references: Genetics. 2005 Apr;169(4):2353-70
references: 15687279
references: Science. 2000 May 19;288(5469):1211-5
references: 10817991
references: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references: 12912839
references: Syst Biol. 2006 Jun;55(3):522-9
references: 16861214
references: Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998;80(1-4):193-8
references: 9678357
references: Science. 2007 Oct 12;318(5848):268-71
references: 17932297
references: Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):1986-90
references: 9748151
references: Genet Res. 1987 Apr;49(2):135-46
references: 3596234
references: Mol Ecol. 1992 Aug;1(2):131-2
references: 1344987
references: Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19(6):1227-38
references: 20163549
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Feb;11(2):41-6
references: 21237759
references: Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):879-906
references: 9335621
references: Biochemistry. 1988 Aug 9;27(16):6008-13
references: 2847780
references: Evolution. 1999 Oct;53(5):1458-1469
references: 28565550
references: Genet Res. 1997 Aug;70(1):63-73
references: 9369098
references: Science. 2008 May 30;320(5880):1210-3
references: 18511688
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Jul;11(7):296
references: 21237848
references: Syst Biol. 2011 Jan;60(1):87-96
references: 21060067
references: Zoolog Sci. 2003 Jun;20(6):727-32
references: 12832823
references: Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737-56
references: 4448362
references: Genetics. 2007 Oct;177(2):917-26
references: 17720916
references: Evolution. 2008 May;62(5):1119-36
references: 18266987
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Apr;24(4):208-17
references: 19282047
references: Dev Genes Evol. 2000 May;210(5):263-9
references: 11180831
references: Biochem Genet. 1999 Oct;37(9-10):317-21
references: 10626039
references: Mutat Res. 1964 May;106:2-9
references: 14195748
references: Am Nat. 2003 Apr;161(4):641-56
references: 12776890
references: Zoolog Sci. 2006 Jun;23(6):529-32
references: 16849840
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Feb;54(2):542-52
references: 19703573
references: J Hered. 2010 Mar-Apr;101 Suppl 1:S34-41
references: 20212007
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 10;101(6):1622-5
references: 14747660
references: Dev Genes Evol. 1998 Mar;208(1):46-50
references: 9518524
references: Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2002 Sep;4(4):347-55
references: 14961246
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Mar 19;8:88
references: 18366680