title: Development of a high-dynamic range, GFP-based FRET probe sensitive to oxidative microenvironments.
abstract: We report the optimization of a novel redox-sensitive probe with enhanced dynamic range and an exceptionally well-positioned oxidative midpoint redox potential. The present work characterizes factors that contribute to the improved Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) performance of this green fluorescent protein (GFP)-based redox sensor. The α-helical linker, which separates the FRET donor and acceptor, has been extended in the new probe and leads to a decreased FRET efficiency in the linker's reduced, 'FRET-off' state. Unexpectedly, the FRET efficiency is increased in the new linker's oxidized, 'FRET-on' state compared with the parent probe, in spite of the longer linker sequence. The combination of a lowered baseline 'FRET-off' and an increased 'FRET-on' signal significantly improves the dynamic range of the probe for a more robust discrimination of its reduced and oxidized linker states. Mutagenesis of the cysteine residues within the α-helix linker reveals the importance of the fourth, C-terminal cysteine and the relative insignificance of the second cysteine in forming the disulfide bridge to clamp the linker into the high-FRET, oxidized state. To further optimize the performance of the redox probe, various cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)/yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) FRET pairs, placed at opposite ends of the improved redox linker (RL7), were quantitatively compared and exchanged. We found that the CyPet/YPet and ECFP/YPet FRET pairs when attached to RL7 do not function well as sensitive redox probes due to a strong tendency to form heterodimers, which disrupt the α-helix. However, monomeric versions of CyPet and YPet (mCyPet and mYPet) eliminate dimerization and restore redox sensitivity of the probe. The best performing probe, ECFP-RL7-EYFP, exhibits an approximately six-fold increase in FRET efficiency in vitro when passing from the oxidized to the reduced state. We determined the midpoint redox potential of the probe to be -143 ± 6 mV, which is ideal for measuring glutathione (GSH/GSSG) redox potentials in oxidative compartments of mammalian cells (e.g. the endoplasmic reticulum).
authors: Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. viadimer@illinois.edu
authors: Vladimir L
authors: VL
authors: Kolossov
authors: Bryan Q
authors: BQ
authors: Spring
authors: Robert M
authors: RM
authors: Clegg
authors: Jennifer J
authors: JJ
authors: Henry
authors: Anna
authors: A
authors: Sokolowski
authors: Paul J A
authors: PJ
authors: Kenis
authors: H Rex
authors: HR
authors: Gaskins
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Mar;23(3):355-60
references: 15696158
references: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005 Jun;288(6):C1273-8
references: 15659713
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):8898-902
references: 3122208
references: Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2008 Feb;233(2):238-48
references: 18222979
references: Protein Sci. 2007 Jul;16(7):1429-38
references: 17586775
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 20;101(29):10554-9
references: 15247428
references: Biochemistry. 2005 Apr 19;44(15):5899-906
references: 15823049
references: J Biol Chem. 2004 May 21;279(21):22284-93
references: 14985369
references: Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2006;43(2):143-81
references: 16517421
references: Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006 Sep-Oct;8(9-10):1865-79
references: 16987039
references: Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008;10:1-38
references: 18647110
references: Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009 May;11(5):1047-58
references: 19014315
references: Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010 Feb;14(1):30-6
references: 19913453
references: Protein Eng. 2001 Aug;14(8):529-32
references: 11579220
references: J Biol Chem. 1995 Nov 3;270(44):26178-83
references: 7592822
references: Methods Enzymol. 1992;211:353-88
references: 1406315
references: Free Radic Biol Med. 2001 Jun 1;30(11):1191-212
references: 11368918
references: Anal Biochem. 2000 Sep 10;284(2):438-40
references: 10964438
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 May;306(1):61-6
references: 20337710
references: Free Radic Biol Med. 2008 Mar 15;44(6):921-37
references: 18155672
references: Trends Biochem Sci. 2007 Sep;32(9):407-14
references: 17764955
references: Nat Methods. 2008 Jun;5(6):553-9
references: 18469822
references: Biol Chem. 2009 Mar;390(3):191-214
references: 19166318
references: Nature. 1990 Mar 15;344(6263):268-70
references: 2314462
references: Science. 2002 May 3;296(5569):913-6
references: 11988576
references: EMBO J. 2001 Nov 1;20(21):5853-62
references: 11689426
references: Antioxid Redox Signal. 2010 Sep 1;13(5):621-50
references: 20088706
references: Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006 Mar-Apr;8(3-4):354-61
references: 16677081
references: J Comput Chem. 2010 May;31(7):1478-85
references: 20127740
references: Cell Death Differ. 2009 Oct;16(10):1303-14
references: 19662025
references: Pharm Res. 2006 Sep;23(9):2116-21
references: 16952003
references: J Biol Chem. 2003 Aug 29;278(35):33408-15
references: 12816947
references: Integr Biol (Camb). 2011 Mar;3(3):208-17
references: 21183971
references: Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Aug;30(15):3758-66
references: 20498274
references: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006 Feb 17;832(1):67-74
references: 16434243
references: Protein Sci. 2006 Jan;15(1):45-57
references: 16322566
references: J Biol Chem. 2004 Mar 26;279(13):13044-53
references: 14722062
references: Protein Sci. 2005 Sep;14(9):2304-14
references: 16131659
references: J Mol Biol. 2005 Oct 21;353(2):397-409
references: 16171814
references: Biochemistry. 2008 Aug 19;47(33):8678-88
references: 18652491
references: PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4391
references: 19194514
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 1;90(7):2994-8
references: 8464916