title: Determining activity monitor wear time: an influential decision rule.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Accurately measuring physical activity (PA) with activity monitors requires sufficient monitor wear time which can be difficult to assess. Monitor sensitivity to movement and population characteristics (eg, children vs. adults) may dictate the duration of monitor inactivity indicative of nonwear. A standardized method for determining appropriate decision rules to identify wear time is needed.
  
  
  METHODS
  Several decision rules based on minimum durations of monitor inactivity (ie, 60, 90, 120, 150 minutes) to identify nonwear were applied to Stepwatch Activity Monitor data from 1064 adult bariatric surgical candidates. The frequency, pattern, and duration of resulting nonwear and wear periods were examined. Generalized Estimating Equations tested the effect of these decision rules on PA measures.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A 60-minute duration resulted in unreasonably large percentages of subjects with unlikely wear patterns [eg, ≥3 nonwear periods in a day (29.9%); ≥2 wear periods of less than an hour in a day (28.7%)]; 120 minutes appeared most reasonable. Wear time decision rules impacted PA measures.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The methods described in this paper can be used to determine appropriate instrument and population specific wear time decision rules. Recognizing monitor wear time is estimated, PA measures least affected by wear time are preferable.
authors: Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
authors: Wendy C
authors: WC
authors: King
authors: Jia
authors: J
authors: Li
authors: Kira
authors: K
authors: Leishear
authors: James E
authors: JE
authors: Mitchell
authors: Steven H
authors: SH
authors: Belle
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Mar;35(3):532-9
references: 12618587
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Jan;36(1):86-92
references: 14707773
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S555-62
references: 16294118
references: Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Sep-Oct;3(5):526-30
references: 17903772
references: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Nov;28(11):1503-8
references: 15326467
references: Diabetes Care. 2004 Sep;27(9):2141-8
references: 15333475
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Mar;36(3):525-32
references: 15076797
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S544-54
references: 16294117
references: Prev Med. 2004 May;38 Suppl:S43-9
references: 15072858
references: World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253
references: 11234459
references: Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008 Feb;18(1):95-101
references: 17355323
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May;79(5):851-6
references: 15113725
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Sep;35(9):1605-11
references: 12972884
references: Phys Ther. 2006 Aug;86(8):1137-45
references: 16879047
references: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jun 09;8:38
references: 18541038
references: Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):116-26
references: 17386392
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Jan;39(1):52-8
references: 17218884
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S582-8
references: 16294121
references: Diabetes. 2008 Mar;57(3):548-54
references: 18003759
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8
references: 18091006
references: J Phys Act Health. 2008;5 Suppl 1:S112-25
references: 18364516
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Aug;34(8):1376-81
references: 12165695
references: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Jun;15(6):1496-512
references: 17557987
references: Am Surg. 2004 Sep;70(9):811-4
references: 15481300
references: Diabetes Care. 2007 Jun;30(6):1384-9
references: 17473059
references: Nutrition. 1996 Jun;12(6):403-4
references: 8875533
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Sep;39(9):1502-8
references: 17805081
references: Can J Public Health. 2007;98 Suppl 2:S195-207
references: 18213949
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992 Oct;24(10):1167-72
references: 1435166
references: Ann Epidemiol. 1999 Nov;9(8):481-8
references: 10549881
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 May;32(5):1018-23
references: 10795795