title: Comparison of UTCI to selected thermal indices.
abstract: Over the past century more than 100 indices have been developed and used to assess bioclimatic conditions for human beings. The majority of these indices are used sporadically or for specific purposes. Some are based on generalized results of measurements (wind chill, cooling power, wet bulb temperature) and some on the empirically observed reactions of the human body to thermal stress (physiological strain, effective temperature). Those indices that are based on human heat balance considerations are referred to as "rational indices". Several simple human heat balance models are known and are used in research and practice. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the newly developed Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI), and some of the more prevalent thermal indices. The analysis is based on three groups of data: global data-set, synoptic datasets from Europe, and local scale data from special measurement campaigns of COST Action 730. We found the present indices to express bioclimatic conditions reasonably only under specific meteorological situations, while the UTCI represents specific climates, weather, and locations much better. Furthermore, similar to the human body, the UTCI is very sensitive to changes in ambient stimuli: temperature, solar radiation, wind and humidity. UTCI depicts temporal variability of thermal conditions better than other indices. The UTCI scale is able to express even slight differences in the intensity of meteorological stimuli.
authors: Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, Warsaw, 00-818, Poland. k.blaz@twarda.pan.pl
authors: Krzysztof
authors: K
authors: Blazejczyk
authors: Yoram
authors: Y
authors: Epstein
authors: Gerd
authors: G
authors: Jendritzky
authors: Henning
authors: H
authors: Staiger
authors: Birger
authors: B
authors: Tinz
references: Am J Physiol. 1998 Jul;275(1):R129-34
references: 9688970
references: Int J Biometeorol. 1995 Aug;39(1):46-52
references: 7558408
references: Int J Biometeorol. 2012 Jan;56(1):165-76
references: 21336880
references: J Biomech Eng. 1998 Apr;120(2):255-8
references: 10412387
references: AMA Arch Ind Health. 1957 Oct;16(4):302-16
references: 13457450
references: Int J Biometeorol. 1999 Oct;43(2):71-5
references: 10552310
references: Int J Biometeorol. 2012 May;56(3):537-55
references: 21347585
references: Int J Biometeorol. 2001 Sep;45(3):143-59
references: 11594634
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Dec;28(12):i-x
references: 8970149
references: Int J Biometeorol. 1981 Jun;25(2):123-6
references: 7251218
references: Int J Biometeorol. 1999 Oct;43(2):76-84
references: 10552311
references: Int J Biometeorol. 2006 Mar;50(4):224-32
references: 16397760
references: Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 May;70(5):480-4
references: 10332944
references: J Hyg (Lond). 1932 Jul;32(3):431-63
references: 20475150
references: Appl Human Sci. 1998 Nov;17(6):267-73
references: 10052225
references: Int J Biometeorol. 2012 May;56(3):495-503
references: 20852897
references: Ind Health. 2006 Jul;44(3):388-98
references: 16922182