title: Missing clinical information in NHS hospital outpatient clinics: prevalence, causes and effects on patient care.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In Britain over 39,000 reports were received by the National Patient Safety Agency relating to failures in documentation in 2007 and the UK Health Services Journal estimated in 2008 that over a million hospital outpatient visits each year might take place without the full record available. Despite these high numbers, the impact of missing clinical information has not been investigated for hospital outpatients in the UK.Studies in primary care in the USA have found 13.6% of patient consultations have missing clinical information, with this adversely affecting care in about half of cases, and in Australia 1.8% of medical errors were found to be due to the unavailability of clinical information.Our objectives were to assess the frequency, nature and potential impact on patient care of missing clinical information in NHS hospital outpatients and to assess the principal causes. This is the first study to present such figures for the UK and the first to look at how clinicians respond, including the associated impact on patient care.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective descriptive study of missing information reported by surgeons, supplemented by interviews on the causes.Data were collected by surgeons in general, gastrointestinal, colorectal and vascular surgical clinics in three teaching hospitals across the UK for over a thousand outpatient appointments. Fifteen interviews were conducted with those involved in collating clinical information for these clinics.The study had ethics approval (Hammersmith and Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Research Ethics Committee), reference number (09/H0707/27). Participants involved in the interviews signed a consent form and were offered the opportunity to review and agree the transcript of their interview before analysis. No patients were involved in this research.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In 15% of outpatient consultations key items of clinical information were missing. Of these patients, 32% experienced a delay or disruption to their care and 20% had a risk of harm. In over half of cases the doctor relied on the patient for the information, making a clinical decision despite the information being missing in 20% of cases. Hospital mergers, temporary staff and non-integrated IT systems were contributing factors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  If these findings are replicated across the NHS then almost 10 million outpatients are seen each year without key clinical information, creating over a million unnecessary appointments, and putting nearly 2 million patients at risk of harm. There is a need for a systematic, regular audit of the prevalence of missing clinical information. Only then will we know the impact on clinical decision making and patient care of new technology, service reorganisations and, crucially given the present financial climate, temporary or reduced staffing levels. Further research is needed to assess the relationship between missing clinical information and diagnostic errors; to examine the issue in primary care; and to consider the patients perspective.
authors: Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College London, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, UK. s.burnett@imperial.ac.uk
authors: Susan J
authors: SJ
authors: Burnett
authors: Vashist
authors: V
authors: Deelchand
authors: Bryony Dean
authors: BD
authors: Franklin
authors: Krishna
authors: K
authors: Moorthy
authors: Charles
authors: C
authors: Vincent
references: BMJ. 1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1154-7
references: 9552960
references: JAMA. 2005 Feb 2;293(5):565-71
references: 15687311
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):104-12
references: 14633936
references: Med J Aust. 1999 May 3;170(9):411-5
references: 10341771
references: Health Serv J. 2008 May 22;:5
references: 18561436
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):233-8
references: 12486987