title: Visual short-term memory compared in rhesus monkeys and humans.
abstract: Change detection is a popular task to study visual short-term memory (STM) in humans [1-4]. Much of this work suggests that STM has a fixed capacity of 4 ± 1 items [1-6]. Here we report the first comparison of change-detection memory between humans and a species closely related to humans, the rhesus monkey. Monkeys and humans were tested in nearly identical procedures with overlapping display sizes. Although the monkeys' STM was well fit by a one-item fixed-capacity memory model, other monkey memory tests with four-item lists have shown performance impossible to obtain with a one-item capacity [7]. We suggest that this contradiction can be resolved using a continuous-resource approach more closely tied to the neural basis of memory [8, 9]. In this view, items have a noisy memory representation whose noise level depends on display size as a result of the distributed allocation of a continuous resource. In accord with this theory, we show that performance depends on the perceptual distance between items before and after the change, and d' depends on display size in an approximately power-law fashion. Our results open the door to combining the power of psychophysics, computation, and physiology to better understand the neural basis of STM.
authors: Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. lauren.c.elmore@uth.tmc.edu
authors: L Caitlin
authors: LC
authors: Elmore
authors: Wei Ji
authors: WJ
authors: Ma
authors: John F
authors: JF
authors: Magnotti
authors: Kenneth J
authors: KJ
authors: Leising
authors: Antony D
authors: AD
authors: Passaro
authors: Jeffrey S
authors: JS
authors: Katz
authors: Anthony A
authors: AA
authors: Wright
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303
references: 18319728
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85
references: 11515286
references: J Vis. 2004 Dec 29;4(12):1120-35
references: 15669916
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Aug;16(4):408-14
references: 16828279
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 22;105(16):5975-9
references: 18420818
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):217-22
references: 18678253
references: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1432-8
references: 17057707
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Nov;88(3):405-33
references: 18047230
references: Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):851-4
references: 18687968
references: J Vis. 2011 Mar 14;11(3):
references: 21402883
references: Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):106-11
references: 14738517
references: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Oct;44(4):369-78
references: 3226885
references: Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
references: 9384378
references: Neuron. 2008 Dec 26;60(6):1142-52
references: 19109917
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1127-33
references: 16615339
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 19;28(12):2991-3007
references: 18354003