title: Sampling strategies for accurate computational inferences of gametic phase across highly polymorphic major histocompatibility complex loci.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Genes of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) are very popular genetic markers among evolutionary biologists because of their potential role in pathogen confrontation and sexual selection. However, MHC genotyping still remains challenging and time-consuming in spite of substantial methodological advances. Although computational haplotype inference has brought into focus interesting alternatives, high heterozygosity, extensive genetic variation and population admixture are known to cause inaccuracies. We have investigated the role of sample size, genetic polymorphism and genetic structuring on the performance of the popular Bayesian PHASE algorithm. To cover this aim, we took advantage of a large database of known genotypes (using traditional laboratory-based techniques) at single MHC class I (N = 56 individuals and 50 alleles) and MHC class II B (N = 103 individuals and 62 alleles) loci in the lesser kestrel Falco naumanni.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Analyses carried out over real MHC genotypes showed that the accuracy of gametic phase reconstruction improved with sample size as a result of the reduction in the allele to individual ratio. We then simulated different data sets introducing variations in this parameter to define an optimal ratio.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results demonstrate a critical influence of the allele to individual ratio on PHASE performance. We found that a minimum allele to individual ratio (1:2) yielded 100% accuracy for both MHC loci. Sampling effort is therefore a crucial step to obtain reliable MHC haplotype reconstructions and must be accomplished accordingly to the degree of MHC polymorphism. We expect our findings provide a foothold into the design of straightforward and cost-effective genotyping strategies of those MHC loci from which locus-specific primers are available.
authors: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. malcaide@oeb.harvard.edu.
authors: Miguel
authors: M
authors: Alcaide
authors: Airam
authors: A
authors: Rodríguez
authors: Juan J
authors: JJ
authors: Negro
references: Electrophoresis. 2010 Apr;31(8):1353-6
references: 20358545
references: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Mar;78(2):468-75
references: 19054221
references: J Mol Evol. 2007 Nov;65(5):541-54
references: 17925996
references: Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1451-2
references: 19346325
references: Front Zool. 2005 Oct 20;2:16
references: 16242022
references: Immunogenetics. 2011 Jun;63(6):377-94
references: 21327606
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 29;9:68
references: 18230173
references: J Immunol Methods. 2003 Aug;279(1-2):143-8
references: 12969555
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Apr 30;10:118
references: 20429950
references: Immunogenetics. 2008 May;60(5):233-47
references: 18389232
references: Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Nov;73(5):1162-9
references: 14574645
references: Immunogenetics. 2008 May;60(5):219-31
references: 18431567
references: Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Jan;70(1):157-69
references: 11741196
references: Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Apr;68(4):978-89
references: 11254454
references: Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Nov;8(6):1239-48
references: 21586011
references: Mol Ecol. 2008 Jun;17(11):2652-65
references: 18489548
references: Hereditas. 2007 Dec;144(6):228-34
references: 18215245
references: Heredity (Edinb). 2006 Jan;96(1):7-21
references: 16094301
references: Mol Ecol. 2010 Feb;19(4):691-705
references: 20074317
references: Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 Mar;10(2):237-51
references: 21565019