title: Apple skin patterning is associated with differential expression of MYB10.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Some apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) varieties have attractive striping patterns, a quality attribute that is important for determining apple fruit market acceptance. Most apple cultivars (e.g. 'Royal Gala') produce fruit with a defined fruit pigment pattern, but in the case of 'Honeycrisp' apple, trees can produce fruits of two different kinds: striped and blushed. The causes of this phenomenon are unknown.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Here we show that striped areas of 'Honeycrisp' and 'Royal Gala' are due to sectorial increases in anthocyanin concentration. Transcript levels of the major biosynthetic genes and MYB10, a transcription factor that upregulates apple anthocyanin production, correlated with increased anthocyanin concentration in stripes. However, nucleotide changes in the promoter and coding sequence of MYB10 do not correlate with skin pattern in 'Honeycrisp' and other cultivars differing in peel pigmentation patterns. A survey of methylation levels throughout the coding region of MYB10 and a 2.5 Kb region 5' of the ATG translation start site indicated that an area 900 bp long, starting 1400 bp upstream of the translation start site, is highly methylated. Cytosine methylation was present in all three contexts, with higher methylation levels observed for CHH and CHG (where H is A, C or T) than for CG. Comparisons of methylation levels of the MYB10 promoter in 'Honeycrisp' red and green stripes indicated that they correlate with peel phenotypes, with an enrichment of methylation observed in green stripes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Differences in anthocyanin levels between red and green stripes can be explained by differential transcript accumulation of MYB10. Different levels of MYB10 transcript in red versus green stripes are inversely associated with methylation levels in the promoter region. Although observed methylation differences are modest, trends are consistent across years and differences are statistically significant. Methylation may be associated with the presence of a TRIM retrotransposon within the promoter region, but the presence of the TRIM element alone cannot explain the phenotypic variability observed in 'Honeycrisp'. We suggest that methylation in the MYB10 promoter is more variable in 'Honeycrisp' than in 'Royal Gala', leading to more variable color patterns in the peel of this cultivar.
authors: Plant Science and Landscape Architecture Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 21201, USA. atelias@umd.edu
authors: Adriana
authors: A
authors: Telias
authors: Kui
authors: K
authors: Lin-Wang
authors: David E
authors: DE
authors: Stevenson
authors: Janine M
authors: JM
authors: Cooney
authors: Roger P
authors: RP
authors: Hellens
authors: Andrew C
authors: AC
authors: Allan
authors: Emily E
authors: EE
authors: Hoover
authors: James M
authors: JM
authors: Bradeen
references: Plant J. 2001 Nov;28(3):319-32
references: 11722774
references: Genetics. 2009 Jan;181(1):81-91
references: 19001287
references: EMBO J. 2000 Nov 15;19(22):6150-61
references: 11080161
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 13;94(10):5172-6
references: 9144210
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Mar;13(3):99-102
references: 18280199
references: Plant J. 2007 Feb;49(3):414-27
references: 17181777
references: Genomics. 2007 Aug;90(2):195-200
references: 17513085
references: Plant Cell. 2002 Sep;14(9):2121-35
references: 12215510
references: Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Jul;48(7):958-70
references: 17526919
references: Plant Cell. 2009 Jan;21(1):168-83
references: 19151225
references: Nutr J. 2004 May 12;3:5
references: 15140261
references: Nature. 2000 Jun 22;405(6789):903-4
references: 10879522
references: New Phytol. 2009;182(1):102-115
references: 19192188
references: Plant J. 2008 Mar;53(5):814-27
references: 18036197
references: Genetics. 2002 Jun;161(2):793-801
references: 12072474
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2008 May;9(5):397-405
references: 18368054
references: Plant J. 2005 Apr;42(2):218-35
references: 15807784
references: Nature. 2004 Jul 22;430(6998):471-6
references: 15269773
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8689-94
references: 20395551
references: Genetics. 1993 Oct;135(2):575-88
references: 7694886
references: Plant J. 2008 Sep;55(6):940-53
references: 18532978
references: Plant Cell. 2007 Nov;19(11):3805-18
references: 17993626
references: Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Feb;112(3):440-4
references: 16328231
references: BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Mar 21;10:50
references: 20302676
references: Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Apr;112(6):999-1008
references: 16404583
references: BMC Genomics. 2007 Jul 03;8:212
references: 17608951
references: Nat Genet. 2010 Oct;42(10):833-9
references: 20802477
references: Nature. 2008 Mar 13;452(7184):215-9
references: 18278030
references: Plant Physiol. 2006 May;141(1):147-66
references: 16531485
references: Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov;142(3):1216-32
references: 17012405
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2003 May;20(5):735-47
references: 12679534
references: Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Jul;34(7):1176-90
references: 21410713
references: Cell. 2006 Sep 22;126(6):1189-201
references: 16949657
references: Plant J. 2008 Sep;55(6):954-67
references: 18532977
references: Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2007 Sep;39(9):675-83
references: 17805462
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 30;98(3):1306-11
references: 11158635
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Feb 7;55(3):663-71
references: 17263458