title: Flexible categorization of relative stimulus strength by the optic tectum.
abstract: Categorization is the process by which the brain segregates continuously variable stimuli into discrete groups. We report that patterns of neural population activity in the owl optic tectum (OT) categorize stimuli based on their relative strengths into "strongest" versus "other." The category boundary shifts adaptively to track changes in the absolute strength of the strongest stimulus. This population-wide categorization is mediated by the responses of a small subset of neurons. Our data constitute the first direct demonstration of explicit categorization of stimuli by a neural network based on relative stimulus strength or salience. The finding of categorization by the population code relaxes constraints on the properties of downstream decoders that might read out the location of the strongest stimulus. These results indicate that the ensemble neural code in the OT could mediate bottom-up stimulus selection for gaze and attention, a form of stimulus categorization in which the category boundary often shifts within hundreds of milliseconds.
authors: Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA. shreesh@stanford.edu
authors: Shreesh P
authors: SP
authors: Mysore
authors: Eric I
authors: EI
authors: Knudsen
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Mar;2(3):194-203
references: 11256080
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Jul;3(7):254-264
references: 10377540
references: Neuron. 2004 Aug 19;43(4):575-83
references: 15312655
references: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Feb;14(2):143-6
references: 21270782
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Sep;100(3):1407-19
references: 18562555
references: Science. 2001 Jan 12;291(5502):312-6
references: 11209083
references: Neuron. 2008 Oct 23;60(2):215-34
references: 18957215
references: J Neurosci Methods. 1996 Nov;69(2):175-88
references: 8946321
references: Nature. 2010 May 6;465(7294):47-52
references: 20393466
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Jun;33(11):1961-72
references: 21645092
references: Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):81-6
references: 12511644
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 18;102(3):524-9
references: 15601760
references: Neuron. 2010 Jan 28;65(2):150-64
references: 20152123
references: Nature. 2006 Sep 7;443(7107):85-8
references: 16936716
references: Hum Neurobiol. 1985;4(4):219-27
references: 3836989
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1980;3:189-226
references: 6774653
references: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Feb;13(2):261-6
references: 20023651
references: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Feb;12(2):221-8
references: 19136972
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 3;30(5):1727-38
references: 20130182
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 6;31(14):5186-96
references: 21471353
references: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Nov;12(11):1458-62
references: 19855389
references: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Sep;104(3):1538-48
references: 20660420
references: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jul;7(7):757-63
references: 15195099
references: Neuron. 2008 Oct 9;60(1):137-48
references: 18940594
references: Trends Neurosci. 2001 Nov;24(11):654-9
references: 11672810
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Aug;21(4):653-60
references: 21696945