title: Tailored, iterative, printed dietary feedback is as effective as group education in improving dietary behaviours: results from a randomised control trial in middle-aged adults with cardiovascular risk factors.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Tailored nutrition interventions have been shown to be more effective than non-tailored materials in changing dietary behaviours, particularly fat intake and fruit and vegetable intake. But further research examining efficacy of tailored nutrition education in comparison to other nutrition education methods and across a wider range of dietary behaviours is needed. The Stages to Healthy Eating Patterns Study (STEPs) was an intervention study, in middle-aged adults with cardiovascular risk factors, to examine the effectiveness of printed, tailored, iterative dietary feedback delivered by mail in improving short-term dietary behaviour in the areas of saturated fat, fruit, vegetable and grain and cereal intake.
  
  
  METHODS
  STEPs was a 3-month randomised controlled trial with a pre and post-test design. There were three experimental conditions: 1) tailored, iterative, printed dietary feedback (TF) with three instalments mail-delivered over a 3-month period that were re-tailored to most recent assessment of dietary intake, intention to change and assessment of self-adequacy of dietary intake. Tailoring for dietary intake was performed on data from a validated 63-item combination FFQ designed for the purpose 2) small group nutrition education sessions (GE): consisting of two 90-minute dietitian-led small group nutrition education sessions and 3) and a wait-listed control (C) group who completed the dietary measures and socio-demographic questionnaires at baseline and 3-months later. Dietary outcome measures in the areas of saturated fat intake (g), and the intake of fruit (serves), vegetables (serves), grain and cereals as total and wholegrain (serves) were collected using 7-day estimated dietary records. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests and general linear models adjusted for baseline dietary intake, age and gender were used to examine the effectiveness of different nutrition interventions.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The TF group reported a significantly greater increase in fruit intake (0.3 serves/d P = 0.031) in comparison to GE and the C group. All three intervention groups showed a reduction in total saturated fat intake. GE also had a within-group increase in mean vegetable intake after 3 months, but this increase was not different from changes in the other groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this study, printed, tailored, iterative dietary feedback was more effective than small group nutrition education in improving the short-term fruit intake behaviour, and as effective in improving saturated fat intake of middle-aged adults with cardiovascular risk factors. This showed that a low-level dietary intervention could achieve modest dietary behaviour changes that are of public health significance.
authors: School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
authors: Janine L
authors: JL
authors: Wright
authors: Jillian L
authors: JL
authors: Sherriff
authors: Satvinder S
authors: SS
authors: Dhaliwal
authors: John C L
authors: JC
authors: Mamo
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Apr;77(4 Suppl):1028S-1034S
references: 12663313
references: Health Educ Res. 2009 Aug;24(4):699-720
references: 19286893
references: Prev Med. 2002 Jul;35(1):25-41
references: 12079438
references: J Nutr. 2005 Oct;135(10):2486-95
references: 16177217
references: J Fam Pract. 2002 Nov;51(11):969-71
references: 12485553
references: Med J Aust. 2001 Nov 5;175(S2):S62-85
references: 11758552
references: Health Educ Res. 1999 Apr;14(2):249-56
references: 10387504
references: Health Educ Res. 2000 Feb;15(1):1-4
references: 10788196
references: Health Psychol. 1988;7(4):355-86
references: 3049068
references: Diabetes Self Manag. 2002 May-Jun;19(3):54-5, 58-60, 65
references: 12091970
references: Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Jun;37(2):177-89
references: 14528544
references: Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):205-23
references: 16700634
references: JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):536-8
references: 19190319
references: World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;916:i-viii, 1-149, backcover
references: 12768890
references: J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Jun;99(6):679-84
references: 10361529
references: J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Aug;100(8):898-904
references: 10955047
references: Am J Public Health. 2009 Feb;99(2):355-61
references: 19059859
references: Prev Med. 1996 May-Jun;25(3):236-42
references: 8781000
references: Public Health Nutr. 2005 Oct;8(7A):1100-7
references: 16277822
references: Proc Nutr Soc. 2004 Nov;63(4):537-47
references: 15831125
references: Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Dec;24(6):576-83
references: 11215004
references: Appetite. 2000 Jun;34(3):285-93
references: 10888292
references: Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102-14
references: 1329589
references: Public Health Nutr. 2008 Mar;11(3):314-20
references: 17612423
references: Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):783-7
references: 8179049