title: Will early reconstruction prevent abnormal kinematics after ACL injury? Two-year follow-up using dynamic radiostereometry in 14 patients operated with hamstring autografts.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Previous studies have reported that Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction does not restore normal tibial rotation in patients with chronic instability and repeated episodes of giving way. We hypothesised that early ACL reconstruction, using quadruple hamstring autografts, before the pivoting episodes had occurred, would protect the knee joint from developing abnormal kinematics with increased external tibial rotation during flexion.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fourteen consecutive patients (8 men, 6 women) with a median age of 24 years (18-43), with a complete, isolated unilateral ACL rupture and an intact contralateral knee, were studied. The operations were performed by one experienced surgeon, using quadruple hamstring autografts. We used dynamic radiostereometry (RSA) with tantalum markers inserted in both the injured and the intact contralateral knee to study the pattern of knee motion during active and weight-bearing knee extension. The patients were evaluated pre-operatively and followed for 2 years after the ACL reconstruction. The anterior-posterior laxity was measured using the KT-1000.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Before surgical repair of the ACL, the internal/external tibial rotation or abduction/adduction did not differ significantly between the injured and intact knees (P = 0.27-0.91). Separate studies of the anterior-posterior translation of the medial and lateral femoral flexion facet centres (MFC and LFC) relative to a fixed tibia did not reveal any significant differences between the injured and intact knees (P = 0.21-0.59). Pre-operatively, the KT-1000 laxity measurements showed a side-to-side difference of 2.5 (1.0-5.5) mm. At 2 years, the laxity side-to-side difference was 0.5 (0-3.0) mm (P = 0.001), and there were still no significant differences between the injured and intact knees in terms of internal/external tibial rotation and abduction/adduction (P = 0.13-0.60). Nor did the anterior-posterior translation of the flexion facet centres differs (P = 0.27-0.97).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  During the first 6-8 weeks after the ACL injury, before pivoting episodes had occurred, the kinematics of the injured knee were normal and did not differ from those of the intact contralateral knee. Reconstruction of the ACL within 10 weeks after injury using quadruple hamstring autografts resulted in unchanged knee kinematics for 2 years and no difference compared with the intact contralateral knee. Surgical repair during the early phase after the injury appears to protect the knee from developing abnormal knee motion after an ACL rupture.
  
  
  METHODS
  III.
authors: Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal, 413 80, Mölndal, Sweden. Jonas.isberg@vgregion.se
authors: Jonas
authors: J
authors: Isberg
authors: Eva
authors: E
authors: Faxén
authors: Gauti
authors: G
authors: Laxdal
authors: Bengt I
authors: BI
authors: Eriksson
authors: Johan
authors: J
authors: Kärrholm
authors: Jon
authors: J
authors: Karlsson
references: J Orthop Res. 1994 Nov;12(6):769-79
references: 7983552
references: Arthroscopy. 2005 Nov;21(11):1323-9
references: 16325082
references: Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct;50(10):3145-52
references: 15476248
references: J Biomech. 2000 Aug;33(8):1029-34
references: 10828334
references: Am J Sports Med. 2002 May-Jun;30(3):361-7
references: 12016076
references: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1108-15
references: 16955299
references: Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):1751-67
references: 16230470
references: J Orthop Res. 2002 Jul;20(4):688-95
references: 12168656
references: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-34
references: 8536037
references: Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):240-6
references: 15701610
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 1989 Aug;60(4):491-503
references: 2683567
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):521-6
references: 20357328
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Nov;(344):94-110
references: 9372762
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Nov;82(8):1189-95
references: 11132285
references: J Orthop Res. 2000 Nov;18(6):856-64
references: 11192244
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jul;448:10-21
references: 16826090
references: Arthroscopy. 1996 Dec;12(6):667-74
references: 9115553
references: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3(3):148-56
references: 8821270
references: Am J Sports Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):189-96
references: 17251174
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Mar;63(3):269-73
references: 14962961
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 1991 Oct;62(5):440-6
references: 1950487
references: Am J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):2006-12
references: 16885514
references: Am J Sports Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;17(4):555-63
references: 2782540
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 May;82(4):499-505
references: 10855870
references: Am J Sports Med. 1986 Mar-Apr;14(2):156-9
references: 3717488
references: J Biomech. 1979;12(9):727-31
references: 489639
references: J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):293-8
references: 15598456
references: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Oct;124(8):518-22
references: 15480713
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 1988 Apr;59(2):158-64
references: 3364185
references: Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72
references: 16195075
references: Arthroscopy. 2005 Jan;21(1):34-42
references: 15650664
references: J Biomech. 2001 Oct;34(10):1355-9
references: 11522316
references: J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):285-92
references: 15598455
references: Clin J Sport Med. 2006 Mar;16(2):111-6
references: 16603879
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Nov;70(5):777-83
references: 3192579
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Aug;72(4):372-8
references: 11580126
references: Am J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;33(10):1579-602
references: 16199611
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Nov;82(8):1201-3
references: 11132288
references: Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;232:1-51
references: 2686344
references: Am J Sports Med. 1989 Nov-Dec;17(6):796-802
references: 2624292
references: J Orthop Res. 2001 Nov;19(6):1162-7
references: 11781019