title: A systematic review of effect of prenatal zinc supplementation on birthweight: meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials.
abstract: The effect of prenatal zinc supplementation on birthweight is controversial as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report conflicting conclusions. A systematic review which includes meta-analysis was done on 17 RCTs conducted worldwide since 1984 to assess the effect of prenatal zinc supplementation on birthweight. The studies were identified through web-based search. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochrane Q test statistic. Effect-size was measured based on standardized mean difference. Pooled effect-size was computed using a variant of random effect model. Thirteen of the 17 RCTs found no association, three reported positive association, and one reported negative association. Based on fixed and random effect models, the pooled effect-sizes were 0.0268 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0764, -0.0229) and 0.0712 (95% CI 0.1619, -0.0194) respectively. The effect-size estimate remains insignificant after stratification was made based on the dose of supplementation (optimal vs high dose), type of study (community vs institution-based), and type of source country (developed vs developing). The meta-analysis did not witness any association between birthweight and prenatal zinc supplementation.
authors: Awassa College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, Ethiopia. samsongmgs@yahoo.com
authors: Samson G
authors: SG
authors: Gebreselassie
authors: Fikre E
authors: FE
authors: Gashe
references: Am J Physiol. 1968 Jul;215(1):160-3
references: 5659329
references: BMJ. 1989 Sep 30;299(6703):826-30
references: 2510845
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 May;71(5 Suppl):1334S-43S
references: 10799411
references: J Trop Pediatr. 2006 Apr;52(2):118-25
references: 16183626
references: Br J Nutr. 2001 May;85 Suppl 2:S101-8
references: 11509097
references: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 May;23(5):403-8
references: 19658043
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Apr;51(4):678-84
references: 2321574
references: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Sep;92(9):886-91
references: 4041395
references: Early Hum Dev. 1985 Jan;10(3-4):295-302
references: 2985353
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1983 Apr;37(4):572-82
references: 6837492
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Feb;53(2):403-12
references: 1989405
references: Proc Nutr Soc. 2006 Feb;65(1):51-60
references: 16441944
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1989 Nov;50(5):945-54
references: 2816802
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1985 Nov;42(5):815-28
references: 4061343
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May;79(5):826-30
references: 15113721
references: J Public Health Med. 1991 Aug;13(3):227-9
references: 1958415
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD000230
references: 17443499
references: Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1986;21(3):117-23
references: 3710284
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Mar 15;678:178-92
references: 8494261
references: J Nutr. 1999 Aug;129(8):1563-8
references: 10419991
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jan;71(1):114-9
references: 10617955
references: Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1993 Oct;37(4):276-84
references: 8112803
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Mar;45(3):139-44
references: 2065637
references: J Health Popul Nutr. 2009 Oct;27(5):619-31
references: 19902797
references: JAMA. 1995 Aug 9;274(6):463-8
references: 7629954
references: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Mar;90(2):F170-1
references: 15724045
references: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 Sep;75(8):725-9
references: 8906006
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1984 Sep;40(3):508-21
references: 6475822
references: Lancet. 1975 Mar 8;1(7906):577-8
references: 47054
references: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988 May-Jun;7(3):430-3
references: 3385557