title: The advantage of standing up to fight and the evolution of habitual bipedalism in hominins.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Many quadrupedal species stand bipedally on their hindlimbs to fight. This posture may provide a performance advantage by allowing the forelimbs to strike an opponent with the range of motion that is intrinsic to high-speed running, jumping, rapid braking and turning; the range of motion over which peak force and power can be produced.
  
  
  RESULTS
  To test the hypothesis that bipedal (i.e., orthograde) posture provides a performance advantage when striking with the forelimbs, I measured the force and energy produced when human subjects struck from "quadrupedal" (i.e., pronograde) and bipedal postures. Downward and upward directed striking energy was measured with a custom designed pendulum transducer. Side and forward strikes were measured with a punching bag instrumented with an accelerometer. When subjects struck downward from a bipedal posture the work was 43.70±12.59% (mean ± S.E.) greater than when they struck from a quadrupedal posture. Similarly, 47.49±17.95% more work was produced when subjects struck upward from a bipedal stance compared to a quadrupedal stance. Importantly, subjects did 229.69±44.19% more work in downward than upward directed strikes. During side and forward strikes the force impulses were 30.12±3.68 and 43.04±9.00% greater from a bipedal posture than a quadrupedal posture, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results indicate that bipedal posture does provide a performance advantage for striking with the forelimbs. The mating systems of great apes are characterized by intense male-male competition in which conflict is resolved through force or the threat of force. Great apes often fight from bipedal posture, striking with both the fore- and hindlimbs. These observations, plus the findings of this study, suggest that sexual selection contributed to the evolution of habitual bipedalism in hominins.
authors: Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America. carrier@biology.utah.edu
authors: David R
authors: DR
authors: Carrier
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001;Suppl 33:70-105
references: 11786992
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 1999;Suppl 29:1-30
references: 10601982
references: Am J Primatol. 2006 Feb;68(2):161-80
references: 16429415
references: Violence Vict. 1993 Fall;8(3):271-94
references: 8186185
references: J Hum Evol. 2009 Jan;56(1):43-54
references: 18986682
references: J Anat. 2008 Oct;213(4):361-72
references: 18657259
references: Nature. 2000 Jan 13;403(6766):156
references: 10646589
references: J Physiol. 1939 Jun 14;96(1):45-64
references: 16995114
references: Anim Behav. 2000 Jan;59(1):221-230
references: 10640384
references: J Anat. 2007 Apr;210(4):491-505
references: 17428206
references: J Biomech. 1996 Aug;29(8):1039-51
references: 8817371
references: J Anat. 2006 Dec;209(6):765-79
references: 17118064
references: Science. 1981 Jan 23;211(4480):341-50
references: 17748254
references: Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;28(5):911-8
references: 10597991
references: J Exp Biol. 2009 Apr;212(Pt 7):1036-52
references: 19282501
references: J Hum Evol. 2000 Sep;39(3):327-44
references: 10964532
references: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Jan;28(1):39-48
references: 14610529
references: Evolution. 2007 Mar;61(3):596-605
references: 17348922
references: Z Tierpsychol. 1978 Dec;48(4):401-20
references: 570781
references: J Polit Econ. 2008;116(3):499-532
references: 19603086
references: J Appl Psychol. 2004 Jun;89(3):428-41
references: 15161403
references: Science. 1989 Sep 15;245(4923):1209-10
references: 2675307
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 22;269(1503):1919-23
references: 12350254
references: J Theor Biol. 1974 Sep;47(1):223-43
references: 4477626
references: Am J Primatol. 2008 Jun;70(6):519-32
references: 18214941
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 1980 Jan;52(1):103-6
references: 6768300
references: J Exp Biol. 2008 Jan;211(Pt 1):150-62
references: 18083743
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007 Jun;133(2):841-6
references: 17427923
references: J Exp Biol. 2006 Nov;209(Pt 21):4389-97
references: 17050854
references: Science. 2007 Jun 1;316(5829):1328-31
references: 17540902
references: Hum Nat. 2002 Dec;13(4):473-91
references: 26193091
references: Biol Psychol. 2005 Sep;70(1):38-43
references: 16038772
references: Ann Biomed Eng. 2003 Feb;31(2):207-20
references: 12627828
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Mar;97(3):241-63
references: 20127307
references: J Hum Evol. 2008 May;54(5):675-83
references: 18023469
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001;Suppl 33:25-53
references: 11786990