title: Kinetic modeling of hyperpolarized 13C label exchange between pyruvate and lactate in tumor cells.
abstract: Measurements of the kinetics of hyperpolarized (13)C label exchange between [1-(13)C]pyruvate and lactate in suspensions of intact and lysed murine lymphoma cells, and in cells in which lactate dehydrogenase expression had been modulated by inhibition of the PI3K pathway, were used to determine quantitatively the role of enzyme activity and membrane transport in controlling isotope flux. Both steps were shown to share in the control of isotope flux in these cells. The kinetics of label exchange were well described by a kinetic model that employed rate constants for the lactate dehydrogenase reaction that had been determined previously from steady state kinetic studies. The enzyme showed pyruvate inhibition in steady state kinetic measurements, which the kinetic model predicted should also be observed in the isotope exchange measurements. However, no such pyruvate inhibition was observed in either intact cells or cell lysates and this could be explained by the much higher enzyme concentrations present in the isotope exchange experiments. The kinetic analysis presented here shows how lactate dehydrogenase activity can be determined from the isotope exchange measurements. The kinetic model should be useful for modeling the exchange reaction in vivo, particularly as this technique progresses to the clinic.
authors: Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom.
authors: Timothy H
authors: TH
authors: Witney
authors: Mikko I
authors: MI
authors: Kettunen
authors: Kevin M
authors: KM
authors: Brindle
references: Magn Reson Med. 2008 Nov;60(5):1029-36
references: 18956454
references: J Biol Chem. 1962 May;237:1668-75
references: 14010189
references: Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
references: 942051
references: Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005;7:287-326
references: 16004573
references: Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;70(4):1296-305
references: 20145128
references: Biochemistry. 1969 Jan;8(1):352-60
references: 4304988
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6324-8
references: 6450416
references: AAPS J. 2008 Jun;10(2):311-21
references: 18523892
references: Neoplasia. 2011 Feb;13(2):81-97
references: 21403835
references: Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2010 May;10(4):417-34
references: 20465497
references: Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 Nov-Dec;18(6):1272-8
references: 18284453
references: Nat Med. 2007 Nov;13(11):1382-7
references: 17965722
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):12051-6
references: 18689683
references: Cancer Res. 2006 Nov 15;66(22):10855-60
references: 17108122
references: Biochem J. 1992 Sep 1;286 ( Pt 2):313-30
references: 1530563
references: Science. 1970 Jan 2;167(3914):63-5
references: 5409479
references: J Magn Reson. 2010 Jan;202(1):85-92
references: 19884027
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 27;106(43):18131-6
references: 19826085
references: Biochem J. 1973 Apr;131(4):719-28
references: 4352912
references: Br J Cancer. 2010 Oct 26;103(9):1400-6
references: 20924379
references: Biochem J. 1994 Dec 15;304 ( Pt 3):751-60
references: 7818477
references: Biochem J. 1982 Dec 15;208(3):583-92
references: 7165719
references: Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr;63(4):872-80
references: 20373388
references: Biochemistry. 1974 Dec 3;13(25):5152-8
references: 4373032
references: J Histochem Cytochem. 1979 Jan;27(1):36-43
references: 220325
references: Eur J Biochem. 1986 Jul 15;158(2):299-305
references: 3732272
references: Magn Reson Med. 2005 Jul;54(1):43-50
references: 15968678
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10158-63
references: 12930897
references: Biochemistry. 1978 May 2;17(9):1646-53
references: 207313
references: Annu Rev Med. 1999;50:277-90
references: 10073278
references: Am J Physiol. 1993 Apr;264(4 Pt 1):C761-82
references: 8476015
references: Neoplasia. 2009 Jun;11(6):574-82, 1 p following 582
references: 19484146
references: Science. 1970 Jul 31;169(3944):480-1
references: 4316548