title: Cracking the code of oscillatory activity.
abstract: Neural oscillations are ubiquitous measurements of cognitive processes and dynamic routing and gating of information. The fundamental and so far unresolved problem for neuroscience remains to understand how oscillatory activity in the brain codes information for human cognition. In a biologically relevant cognitive task, we instructed six human observers to categorize facial expressions of emotion while we measured the observers' EEG. We combined state-of-the-art stimulus control with statistical information theory analysis to quantify how the three parameters of oscillations (i.e., power, phase, and frequency) code the visual information relevant for behavior in a cognitive task. We make three points: First, we demonstrate that phase codes considerably more information (2.4 times) relating to the cognitive task than power. Second, we show that the conjunction of power and phase coding reflects detailed visual features relevant for behavioral response--that is, features of facial expressions predicted by behavior. Third, we demonstrate, in analogy to communication technology, that oscillatory frequencies in the brain multiplex the coding of visual features, increasing coding capacity. Together, our findings about the fundamental coding properties of neural oscillations will redirect the research agenda in neuroscience by establishing the differential role of frequency, phase, and amplitude in coding behaviorally relevant information in the brain.
authors: Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. philippe.schyns@glasgow.ac.uk
authors: Philippe G
authors: PG
authors: Schyns
authors: Gregor
authors: G
authors: Thut
authors: Joachim
authors: J
authors: Gross
references: BMC Neurosci. 2007 Apr 17;8:27
references: 17439642
references: Vision Res. 2001 Aug;41(17):2261-71
references: 11448718
references: Trends Neurosci. 2009 Jan;32(1):9-18
references: 19012975
references: Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):184-9
references: 15733197
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 14;107(37):16048-53
references: 20805482
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Apr;6(4):285-96
references: 15803160
references: BMC Neurosci. 2009 Jul 16;10:81
references: 19607698
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Nov;5(11):e1000561
references: 19911045
references: Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 22;21(4):334-7
references: 21315592
references: Trends Neurosci. 2007 Jul;30(7):309-16
references: 17555828
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-25
references: 11747097
references: Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1626-8
references: 16973878
references: Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1465-73
references: 17706433
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Aug;2(8):539-50
references: 11483997
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul;11(7):267-9
references: 17548233
references: Curr Biol. 2008 Mar 11;18(5):375-80
references: 18328702
references: Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Apr;64(1):24-30
references: 16956685
references: Nature. 2002 Jun 13;417(6890):741-6
references: 12066185
references: Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):828-32
references: 14574410
references: Science. 2004 Jun 25;304(5679):1926-9
references: 15218136
references: Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):49-65, 111-25
references: 10677026
references: J Neurosci. 2008 May 28;28(22):5696-709
references: 18509031
references: Trends Neurosci. 2010 Mar;33(3):111-20
references: 20045201
references: Science. 2008 Apr 4;320(5872):110-3
references: 18388295
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 4;103(14):5626-31
references: 16567643
references: Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 18;17(18):1580-5
references: 17869111