title: The evolution of concepts of color vision.
abstract: The evolution of ideas about the way we see color was closely linked to physical theories of light. Proponents of both corpuscular and wave theories viewed light as a continuous spectrum. This was not easily reconciled with the fact that, for the human eye, all colors can be matched by mixture of three primaries. Physicists such as Mayer who described trichromatic color matching often assumed that there were just three types of rays in the spectrum. This argument was finally resolved by Thomas Young, who noted that trichromatic color matching was consistent with a continuous spectrum if there were just three receptors in the eye. This kind of conceptual mistake, in this case the confusion of the properties of the visual system with physical properties of light, has been common in the history of color science. As another example, the idea of trichromacy was disputed by those who viewed color sensations as opponent processes, red-green, blue-yellow and black-white. The discovery of color-opponent neurons in the visual pathway has partly resolved this dilemma. Much of the physiological substrate of the way we detect and distinguish colors is now established, but the link between the signals leaving the retina and the way we name and order colors is still poorly defined.
authors: SUNY College of Optometry, New York, U.S.A. and Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
authors: Barry B
authors: BB
authors: Lee
references: J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1956 Jan;11(1):66-96
references: 13295579
references: Psychol Rev. 1957 Nov;64, Part 1(6):384-404
references: 13505974
references: Vision Res. 2002 Feb;42(3):281-92
references: 11809481
references: J Physiol. 1968 Dec;199(3):533-47
references: 4974745
references: J Physiol. 1987 Sep;390:145-60
references: 3443931
references: J Opt Soc Am. 1966 Jul;56(7):966-77
references: 4959282
references: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1993 Dec;10(12):2491-521
references: 8301403
references: J Physiol. 1963 Sep;168:345-59
references: 14062681
references: J Opt Soc Am. 1952 Aug;42(8):509-21
references: 14946611
references: J Physiol. 1980 Jan;298:501-11
references: 7359434
references: J Physiol. 1965 Jan;176:24-37
references: 14281404
references: Vision Res. 1975 Feb;15(2):161-71
references: 1129973
references: Physiol Rev. 1991 Apr;71(2):447-80
references: 2006220
references: Clin Exp Optom. 2004 Jul;87(4-5):239-48
references: 15312028
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 1;101(22):8461-6
references: 15148406
references: Science. 1995 Feb 17;267(5200):984-8
references: 7863342