title: Comparison of the sensitivity of imprint and scraping techniques in the diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis in a referral centre in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
abstract: American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) is an infectious disease that presents a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations making parasitological tests important for its diagnosis. Direct examination, although considered of low sensitivity is still employed mainly in areas with poor laboratory infrastructure. The aim of this study was to standardize the method of collecting and reading the scraping procedure and to then compare sensitivity of this procedure on two sites of the lesion (outer edge-OE and inner edge-IE) and of the imprint against the reference method (isolation in culture) in a group of 110 patients treated at a Referral Center in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ATL diagnosis was confirmed in 40 patients (36.4%), 39 cases were caused by L. braziliensis and 1 by L. amazonensis. Imprint was positive in 28 patients and scraping in OE in 17 and in IE in 25 patients, resulting in sensitivity of 70%, 42.5%, and 62.5% respectively. When the three direct examinations were combined, sensitivity value attained 77.5%. Aspects related to ease and quality of the collected material, pain intensity and frequency of bleeding in the scraping procedure were also broached and discussed in this study. The parameters of accuracy presented indicate that the direct methods can be safely used in ATL diagnosis, principally in IE scraping, as it is easy to produce and the examination is not costly, which allows the procedure to be repeated at different moments which, in turn, increases the possibility of finding the parasite. Despite that the direct methods are technically widespread, they are not standardized and the parameters of accuracy are unknown. If we consider the high incidence of leishmaniasis in low-income areas, the implantation of standardized and selective methods would provide advances in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis.
authors: Laboratório de Vigilância em Leishmanioses, Instituto de Pesquisa Clinica Evandro Chagas-IPEC, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Avenida Brasil, 4365, 21040-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. cintia.mello@ipec.fiocruz.br
authors: Cintia Xavier
authors: CX
authors: de Mello
authors: Armando
authors: A
authors: de Oliveira Schubach
authors: Raquel Vasconcellos Carvalho
authors: RV
authors: de Oliveira
authors: Fátima
authors: F
authors: Conceição-Silva
authors: Maria Inês Fernandes
authors: MI
authors: Pimentel
authors: Marcelo Rosandiski
authors: MR
authors: Lyra
authors: Erica Camargo Ferreira
authors: EC
authors: E Vasconcellos
authors: Maria
authors: M
authors: de Fátima Madeira
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Apr;44(4):1435-9
references: 16597873
references: Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;7(9):581-96
references: 17714672
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006 May;100(5):442-5
references: 16257024
references: Cad Saude Publica. 1994;10 Suppl 2:359-75
references: 15042226
references: Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2006 Jan-Feb;72(1):28-32
references: 16481706
references: Biometrics. 1977 Jun;33(2):363-74
references: 884196
references: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Jul;49(1):70-4
references: 12833011
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994 Mar;50(3):296-311
references: 8147488
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Oct;38(10):3768-73
references: 11015400
references: Am Fam Physician. 2004 Mar 15;69(6):1455-60
references: 15053410
references: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Sep;61(3):441-50
references: 19700014
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002 Apr;96 Suppl 1:S169-71
references: 12055833
references: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2000 Nov-Dec;42(6):321-5
references: 11136518
references: Braz J Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;11(1):106-9
references: 17625737
references: Acta Cytol. 1995 Jan-Feb;39(1):82-4
references: 7847014
references: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1997 Jan-Feb;92(1):87
references: 9302416
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987 May;36(3):489-96
references: 2437815
references: Ann Saudi Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):93-7
references: 15323268
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990 Jan;42(1):36-42
references: 2301704
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Jul;101(7):735-7
references: 17368698
references: Br J Dermatol. 1975 Jul;93(1):43-5
references: 1103933
references: Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008 Apr;21(2):129-33
references: 18317034
references: Braz J Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;13(1):47-52
references: 19578630
references: Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011 Jan-Feb;44(1):127
references: 21340427