title: Age and receipt of guideline-recommended medications for heart failure: a nationwide study of veterans.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Older patients often receive less guideline-concordant care for heart failure than younger patients.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether age differences in heart failure care are explained by patient, provider, and health system characteristics and/or by chart-documented reasons for non-adherence to guidelines.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective cohort study of 2,772 ambulatory veterans with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% from a 2004 nationwide medical record review program (the VA External Peer Review Program).
  
  
  METHODS
  Ambulatory use of ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta blockers.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Among 2,772 patients, mean age was 73 +/- 10 years, 87% received an ACE inhibitor or ARB, and 82% received a beta blocker. When patients with explicit chart-documented reasons for not receiving these drugs were excluded, 95% received an ACE inhibitor or ARB and 89% received a beta blocker. In multivariable analyses controlling for a variety of patient and health system characteristics, the adjusted odds ratio for ACE-inhibitor and ARB use was 0.43 (95% CI 0.24-0.78) for patients age 80 and over vs. those age 50-64 years, and the adjusted odds ratio for beta blocker use was 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.93) between the two age groups. The magnitude of these associations was similar but not statistically significant after excluding patients with chart-documented reasons for not prescribing ACE inhibitors or ARBs and beta blockers.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A high proportion of veterans receive guideline-recommended medications for heart failure. Older veterans are consistently less likely to receive these drugs, although these differences were no longer significant when accounting for patients with chart-documented reasons for not prescribing these drugs. Closely evaluating reasons for non-prescribing in older adults is essential to assessing whether non-treatment represents good clinical judgment or missed opportunities to improve care.
authors: San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA. mike.steinman@ucsf.edu
authors: Michael A
authors: MA
authors: Steinman
authors: John B
authors: JB
authors: Harlow
authors: Barry M
authors: BM
authors: Massie
authors: Peter J
authors: PJ
authors: Kaboli
authors: Kathy Z
authors: KZ
authors: Fung
authors: Paul A
authors: PA
authors: Heidenreich
references: N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 1;325(5):293-302
references: 2057034
references: Eur J Heart Fail. 2007 Dec;9(12):1205-11
references: 18023249
references: Am Heart J. 2009 Jun;157(6):1010-7
references: 19464411
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Dec;58(557):862-9
references: 19068160
references: Am J Med Qual. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):201-6
references: 15532912
references: JAMA. 2002 Feb 20;287(7):883-9
references: 11851582
references: N Engl J Med. 2001 May 31;344(22):1651-8
references: 11386263
references: Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;63(2):226-32
references: 19196361
references: Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jul 1;104(1):107-15
references: 19576329
references: Am J Cardiol. 1997 Apr 15;79(8):1118-20
references: 9114778
references: Ann Intern Med. 2001 Oct 16;135(8 Pt 2):694-702
references: 11601952
references: Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010 Dec;8(6):583-94
references: 21356507
references: BMJ. 2003 Jan 25;326(7382):196
references: 12543836
references: Am Heart J. 2005 May;149(5):921-6
references: 15894978
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jan 15;41(2):217-23
references: 12535812
references: Am Heart J. 2005 Oct;150(4):717-24
references: 16209973
references: Eur Heart J. 2004 Aug;25(15):1300-9
references: 15288157
references: Med J Aust. 2004 Jul 19;181(2):78-81
references: 15257642
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613-9
references: 1607900
references: Circulation. 2004 Aug 10;110(6):724-31
references: 15289383
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jul;53(7):1214-6
references: 16108941
references: Circ Heart Fail. 2008 Jul;1(2):98-106
references: 19808279
references: Eur J Heart Fail. 2004 Aug;6(5):663-8
references: 15302016
references: N Engl J Med. 1999 Sep 2;341(10):709-17
references: 10471456
references: Am Heart J. 2004 Oct;148(4):710-7
references: 15459605
references: N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2218-27
references: 12773650
references: Eur J Heart Fail. 2005 Jun;7(4):657-61
references: 15921808
references: JAMA. 2005 Aug 10;294(6):716-24
references: 16091574
references: Eur Heart J. 2005 Feb;26(3):215-25
references: 15642700
references: Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):270-7
references: 17310051
references: Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):717-27
references: 18490685
references: Am J Cardiol. 2004 Mar 15;93(6):714-8
references: 15019875
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Dec;21(12):1306-9
references: 17105526
references: Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1174-83
references: 18035092
references: Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):461-5
references: 15838410
references: JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1240-7
references: 16160132
references: Arch Intern Med. 2005 Oct 10;165(18):2069-76
references: 16216996
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Jul;50(456):559-63
references: 10954938
references: Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Aug;3(4):469-79
references: 11511434
references: Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 12;170(7):587-95
references: 20386001
references: Age Ageing. 2004 Sep;33(5):467-72
references: 15217777
references: Circulation. 2005 Sep 20;112(12):e154-235
references: 16160202
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Aug;52(8):781-90
references: 10465323
references: Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006 Jul;21(4):393-9
references: 16755210