title: Development of modelling method selection tool for health services management: from problem structuring methods to modelling and simulation methods.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is an increasing recognition that modelling and simulation can assist in the process of designing health care policies, strategies and operations. However, the current use is limited and answers to questions such as what methods to use and when remain somewhat underdeveloped.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this study is to provide a mechanism for decision makers in health services planning and management to compare a broad range of modelling and simulation methods so that they can better select and use them or better commission relevant modelling and simulation work.
  
  
  METHODS
  This paper proposes a modelling and simulation method comparison and selection tool developed from a comprehensive literature review, the research team's extensive expertise and inputs from potential users. Twenty-eight different methods were identified, characterised by their relevance to different application areas, project life cycle stages, types of output and levels of insight, and four input resources required (time, money, knowledge and data).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The characterisation is presented in matrix forms to allow quick comparison and selection. This paper also highlights significant knowledge gaps in the existing literature when assessing the applicability of particular approaches to health services management, where modelling and simulation skills are scarce let alone money and time.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A modelling and simulation method comparison and selection tool is developed to assist with the selection of methods appropriate to supporting specific decision making processes. In particular it addresses the issue of which method is most appropriate to which specific health services management problem, what the user might expect to be obtained from the method, and what is required to use the method. In summary, we believe the tool adds value to the scarce existing literature on methods comparison and selection.
authors: Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
authors: Gyuchan T
authors: GT
authors: Jun
authors: Zoe
authors: Z
authors: Morris
authors: Tillal
authors: T
authors: Eldabi
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Harper
authors: Aisha
authors: A
authors: Naseer
authors: Brijesh
authors: B
authors: Patel
authors: John P
authors: JP
authors: Clarkson
references: J Biomed Inform. 2006 Dec;39(6):648-55
references: 16442853
references: BMC Public Health. 2008 Dec 18;8:415
references: 19094194
references: Emerg Med J. 2004 Nov;21(6):685-91
references: 15496694
references: J Public Health Med. 2003 Dec;25(4):325-35
references: 14747592
references: Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jul-Sep;34(3):206-13
references: 19625822
references: Health Care Manag Sci. 2003 May;6(2):105-16
references: 12733614
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:3
references: 11882257
references: Milbank Q. 2001;79(3):429-57, IV-V
references: 11565163
references: Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jul-Sep;34(3):214-5
references: 19625823
references: Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Jun;21(3):214-24
references: 19363123