title: Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the best approach? Frame the issue.
abstract: Surgical resection continues to be the gold standard treatment approach for early invasive and locoregional esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy has historically had a reputation as a complex operation with high mortality and morbidity. Increasingly, results from high-volume specialized centers have demonstrated that mortality rates of below 4% should be expected and that patients can potentially demonstrate excellent levels of quality of life following surgical resection. Up until recently, virtually all surgical resections were done utilizing an open approach utilizing either a transthoracic or a transhiatal operation. Over the past several years, however, a variety of fully minimally invasive or hybrid procedures have been advocated with a view of improving mortality and morbidity outcomes. In the absence of either randomized or controlled prospective comparisons, this series of papers will review current perceptions of the advantages of both minimally invasive and open surgery for the treatment of esophageal cancer.
authors: Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. gtsdel@vmmc.org
authors: Donald E
authors: DE
authors: Low
references: Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(3):195-202
references: 19191856
references: J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Nov;13(11):1900-10; discussion 1910-2
references: 19760305
references: Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):135-46
references: 19365314
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1319-26
references: 20338377
references: Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):495-8
references: 19623479
references: Arch Surg. 2008 Dec;143(12):1198-203; discussion 1203
references: 19075172
references: Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):121-33
references: 19365313
references: Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct;103(10):2589-97
references: 18785950
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Mar 15;64(4):1106-11
references: 16504758
references: J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):851-6
references: 19139439
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Mar;210(3):306-13
references: 20193893
references: Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005 May;29(5):551-6
references: 15980749