title: Residual heat of laparoscopic energy devices: how long must the surgeon wait to touch additional tissue?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Energy devices are essential laparoscopic tools. Residual heat is defined as the increased instrument temperature after energy activation is completed. This study aimed to determine the length of time a surgeon needs to wait before touching other tissue using four common laparoscopic energy sources.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thermal imaging quantified instrument and tissue temperature ex vivo using monopolar coagulation, argon beam coagulation, ultrasonic dissection, and bipolar tissue fusion devices. To simulate realistic operative usage, each instrument was activated for 5 s four consecutive times with 5 s pauses between fires. Thermal conductivity to bovine liver tissue was measured 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 s after final activation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The maximum increase in instrument tip temperature was 172 ± 63°C for the ultrasonic dissection, 81 ± 18°C for the monopolar coagulation, 46 ± 19°C for the bipolar tissue fusion, and 1 ± 1°C for the argon beam coagulation (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Touching the instrument tip to tissue at four intervals after the final activation (2.5, 5, 10, and 20 s) found that ultrasonic energy raised the tissue temperature higher (maximum change, 58°C) than the other three energy devices at all four time points (P < 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Ultrasonic energy instruments have greater residual heat than monopolar electrosurgery, bipolar tissue fusion, and argon beam. The ultrasonic energy instrument tips heated tissue more than 20°C from baseline even 20 s after activation; whereas all the other energy sources raised the tissue temperature less than 20°C by 5 s. These practical findings may alter a surgeon's usage of these common energy devices.
authors: Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Ave., MS C313, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
authors: Henry R
authors: HR
authors: Govekar
authors: Thomas N
authors: TN
authors: Robinson
authors: Greg V
authors: GV
authors: Stiegmann
authors: Francis T
authors: FT
authors: McGreevy
references: J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1995 Aug;40(4):249-59
references: 7674209
references: Brain. 1994 Apr;117 ( Pt 2):375-84
references: 8186963
references: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 Feb;4(2):167-71
references: 9050724
references: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Oct;20(5):317-20
references: 20975502
references: Am J Surg. 2000 Jan;179(1):67-73
references: 10737583
references: Surg Today. 2006;36(10):908-13
references: 16998685
references: J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Aug;179(2):161-70
references: 8044385
references: Endoscopy. 2002 Jul;34(7):575-9
references: 12170413
references: Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):462-5
references: 19572175
references: Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):186-91
references: 12560776
references: Surg Endosc. 2008 Jun;22(6):1464-9
references: 18027042