title: Fine frequency tuning in monkey auditory cortex and thalamus.
abstract: The frequency resolution of neurons throughout the ascending auditory pathway is important for understanding how sounds are processed. In many animal studies, the frequency tuning widths are about 1/5th octave wide in auditory nerve fibers and much wider in auditory cortex neurons. Psychophysical studies show that humans are capable of discriminating far finer frequency differences. A recent study suggested that this is perhaps attributable to fine frequency tuning of neurons in human auditory cortex (Bitterman Y, Mukamel R, Malach R, Fried I, Nelken I. Nature 451: 197-201, 2008). We investigated whether such fine frequency tuning was restricted to human auditory cortex by examining the frequency tuning width in the awake common marmoset monkey. We show that 27% of neurons in the primary auditory cortex exhibit frequency tuning that is finer than the typical frequency tuning of the auditory nerve and substantially finer than previously reported cortical data obtained from anesthetized animals. Fine frequency tuning is also present in 76% of neurons of the auditory thalamus in awake marmosets. Frequency tuning was narrower during the sustained response compared to the onset response in auditory cortex neurons but not in thalamic neurons, suggesting that thalamocortical or intracortical dynamics shape time-dependent frequency tuning in cortex. These findings challenge the notion that the fine frequency tuning of auditory cortex is unique to human auditory cortex and that it is a de novo cortical property, suggesting that the broader tuning observed in previous animal studies may arise from the use of anesthesia during physiological recordings or from species differences.
authors: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 720 Rutland Ave., Traylor 410, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
authors: Edward L
authors: EL
authors: Bartlett
authors: Srivatsun
authors: S
authors: Sadagopan
authors: Xiaoqin
authors: X
authors: Wang
references: Exp Brain Res. 1989;74(2):353-64
references: 2924855
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 May;69(5):1374-85
references: 7240567
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1979 Dec;66(6):1725-32
references: 521557
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1997 Dec;181(6):635-50
references: 9449823
references: Hear Res. 1999 May;131(1-2):135-52
references: 10355611
references: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1475-88
references: 17652420
references: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2501-12
references: 16394068
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):22-34
references: 15342713
references: J Comp Neurol. 1988 Mar 8;269(2):235-48
references: 3128585
references: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;95(6):3756-69
references: 16554513
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1999 Apr;184(4):371-85
references: 10377974
references: Exp Brain Res. 1978 Jul 14;32(3):389-407
references: 98341
references: J Exp Biol. 1977 Aug;69:207-32
references: 908910
references: J Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;85(4):1732-49
references: 11287495
references: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;11(4):709-24
references: 20658165
references: J Comp Neurol. 2005 Jul 11;487(4):391-406
references: 15906314
references: Science. 2003 Feb 14;299(5609):1073-5
references: 12586943
references: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Dec;4(4):541-54
references: 14716510
references: Hear Res. 2010 Jan;259(1-2):1-15
references: 19531377
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1994 Jun;174(6):671-83
references: 8014918
references: J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3621-38
references: 17376842
references: J Neurophysiol. 1981 Sep;46(3):605-20
references: 7299436
references: Eur J Neurosci. 1996 May;8(5):1001-17
references: 8743748
references: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec;88(6):3409-20
references: 12466457
references: J Neurophysiol. 1988 May;59(5):1627-38
references: 3385476
references: J Neurosci. 2010 May 26;30(21):7314-25
references: 20505098
references: J Physiol. 1972 Oct;226(1):263-87
references: 5083170
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 29;336(1278):347-55
references: 1354374
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2889-98
references: 18701751
references: J Neurophysiol. 2001 Jun;85(6):2364-80
references: 11387383
references: J Neurophysiol. 1985 Apr;53(4):1109-45
references: 3998795
references: J Neurosci. 1983 Nov;3(11):2350-64
references: 6631485
references: Neuron. 2008 Apr 10;58(1):132-43
references: 18400169
references: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Apr;77(4):2098-114
references: 9114258
references: J Neurosci. 1993 Jan;13(1):87-103
references: 8423485
references: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Oct;15(10):1637-53
references: 15703254
references: Exp Brain Res. 1981;41(3-4):222-32
references: 7215486
references: Cereb Cortex. 2004 Sep;14(9):952-65
references: 15115736
references: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jan;87(1):516-27
references: 11784767
references: J Comp Neurol. 1997 May 26;382(1):89-103
references: 9136813
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;100(4):2312-27
references: 18701761
references: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Oct;90(4):2660-75
references: 12815016
references: J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):1062-6
references: 11495976
references: J Comp Neurol. 1999 Dec 27;415(4):460-81
references: 10570456
references: J Comp Neurol. 2002 Nov 25;453(4):345-60
references: 12389207
references: J Neurophysiol. 1975 Sep;38(5):1196-1207
references: 1177012
references: J Comp Neurol. 1995 Nov 13;362(2):171-94
references: 8576432
references: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1005-17
references: 17050830
references: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Sep;15(9):1371-83
references: 15616127
references: J Neurophysiol. 2000 Apr;83(4):2315-31
references: 10758136
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 26;28(13):3415-26
references: 18367608
references: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Jul;82(1):152-63
references: 10400944
references: J Comp Neurol. 2006 May 1;496(1):72-96
references: 16528728
references: Nature. 2008 Jan 10;451(7175):197-201
references: 18185589
references: J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(4):671-700
references: 5881249
references: Exp Brain Res. 2001 Sep;140(2):145-61
references: 11521147