title: Depressive symptoms and psychosocial functioning in preadolescent children.
abstract: The current study was designed to determine the percentage of children "at-risk" of depression or evidencing clinical levels of depression. In addition, the study examined how the "at-risk" and the clinical groups differed from children who demonstrated no depressive symptoms on positive and negative affect, four aspects of self-concept, and peer ratings of popularity. Respondents were 510 children (270 boys 240 girls) who ranged in age from 7 to 13 years (mean = 9.39). The results demonstrated that 23% of children were either in the "at-risk" or clinical range of depression. Children in both the clinical and the "at-risk" range demonstrated higher negative affect but lower positive affect and lower self-concepts than children in the normal range. However, children's peers only differentiated between the "clinical" and "normal" groups. It is harder for peers, and other informants such as teachers and parents, to detect the problems of children with elevated depressive symptoms but who do not meet the diagnostic criteria. It is important to implement intervention programs for children who evidence depression symptoms, as well as "at-risk" children. "At-risk" children with elevated levels of depressive symptoms may be more disadvantaged, as their problems are less likely to be detected and treated.
authors: School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
authors: Marita
authors: M
authors: McCabe
authors: Lina
authors: L
authors: Ricciardelli
authors: Sophie
authors: S
authors: Banfield
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71
references: 13688369
references: Ceylon Med J. 2008 Jun;53(2):65-7
references: 18678127
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1984 Dec;12(4):605-20
references: 6491065
references: Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;151(7):979-86
references: 8010383
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1996 Nov;105(4):530-40
references: 8952186
references: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;33(2):208-16
references: 8150792
references: Psychol Bull. 1987 Mar;101(2):213-32
references: 3562706
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990 May;47(5):465-73
references: 2184797
references: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999 Feb;38(2):129-37
references: 9951211
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Aug;107(3):481-96
references: 9715583
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1996 Jun;24(3):241-55
references: 8836800
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1994 Jun;22(3):355-71
references: 8064038
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Dec;35(6):913-27
references: 17549619
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;56(9):794-801
references: 12884885
references: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Apr;36(4):458-65
references: 9100419
references: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002 Dec;31(4):465-79
references: 12402566
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2001 Feb;29(1):41-56
references: 11316334
references: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;32(4):714-22
references: 8340290
references: Br J Psychiatry. 1990 May;156:689-98
references: 2095946
references: Res Nurs Health. 2010 Jun;33(3):179-91
references: 20229520
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Nov;38(8):1069-81
references: 20607385
references: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;43(1):63-70
references: 14691361
references: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Nov;35(11):1427-39
references: 8936909
references: Adolescence. 2008 Winter;43(172):847-59
references: 19149149
references: J Affect Disord. 2005 Dec;89(1-3):35-44
references: 16219362
references: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Feb;63(1):90-100
references: 7896995