title: Visualisation and subsets of the chemical universe database GDB-13 for virtual screening.
abstract: The chemical universe database GDB-13, which enumerates 977 million organic molecules up to 13 atoms of C, N, O, S and Cl following simple chemical stability and synthetic feasibility rules, represents a vast reservoir for new fragments. GDB-13 was classified using the MQN-system discussed in the preceding paper for the analysis of PubChem fragments. Two hundred and fifty-five subsets of GDB-13 were generated by the combinatorial use of eight restrictive criteria, including fragment-like ("rule of three") and scaffold-like (no acyclic carbon atoms) filters. Virtual screening for analogs of 15 commercial drugs of 13 non-hydrogen atoms or less shows that retrieving MQN-neighbors of a query molecule from GDB-13 or its subsets provides on average a 38-fold enrichment in structural analogs (Daylight-type substructure fingerprint Tanimoto T (SF) > 0.7), and a 75-fold enrichment in shape-similar analogs (ROCS TanimotoCombo score > 1.4). An MQN-searchable version of GDB-13 is provided at www.gdb.unibe.ch .
authors: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Berne, Freiestrasse 3, 3012, Berne, Switzerland.
authors: Lorenz C
authors: LC
authors: Blum
authors: Ruud
authors: R
authors: van Deursen
authors: Jean-Louis
authors: JL
authors: Reymond
references: ACS Med Chem Lett. 2010 Sep 03;1(9):499-503
references: 24900238
references: J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Mar-Apr;47(2):342-53
references: 17260980
references: J Med Chem. 2010 Oct 14;53(19):7236-50
references: 20812729
references: J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Feb 22;50(2):205-16
references: 20088575
references: Methods Mol Biol. 2011;672:299-323
references: 20838974
references: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1999 Oct 4;38(19):2894-2896
references: 10540384
references: Drug Discov Today. 2003 Oct 1;8(19):876-7
references: 14554012
references: J Med Chem. 2006 Nov 16;49(23):6789-801
references: 17154509
references: Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Aug;3(8):660-72
references: 15286733
references: ACS Med Chem Lett. 2010 Jul 20;1(8):422-6
references: 24900227
references: J Med Chem. 2007 Jan 11;50(1):74-82
references: 17201411
references: J Med Chem. 2010 May 27;53(10):3862-86
references: 20158188
references: ChemMedChem. 2008 Oct;3(10):1520-4
references: 18792895
references: Drug Discov Today. 2006 Dec;11(23-24):1046-53
references: 17129822
references: Drug Discov Today Technol. 2010 Autumn;7(3):e147-202
references: 24103769
references: Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009 Oct;9(5):615-21
references: 19477685
references: ChemMedChem. 2009 Nov;4(11):1803-5
references: 19774591
references: J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Nov 22;50(11):1924-34
references: 20945869
references: J Med Chem. 2005 Mar 10;48(5):1489-95
references: 15743191
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jul;37(Web Server issue):W623-33
references: 19498078
references: J Chem Inf Model. 2009 May;49(5):1193-201
references: 19405526
references: J Chem Inf Model. 2005 Jan-Feb;45(1):177-82
references: 15667143
references: J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Jul 1;131(25):8732-3
references: 19505099
references: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009 Jul 15;19(14):3832-5
references: 19394821
references: Drug Discov Today. 2005 Jul 15;10(14):987-92
references: 16023057
references: J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2011 Jul;25(7):649-62
references: 21618008
references: Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010 Jun;14(3):325-30
references: 20457001
references: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009 Aug;20(4):429-36
references: 19733475
references: J Cheminform. 2009 Jun 10;1(1):8
references: 20298526
references: Nat Prod Rep. 2004 Aug;21(4):512-8
references: 15282633
references: Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010 Jun;14(3):299-307
references: 20223699
references: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2005 Feb 25;44(10):1504-8
references: 15674983
references: Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007 Mar;6(3):211-9
references: 17290284