title: Clinical effectiveness of a one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 2 years.
abstract: A 2-year randomized, controlled prospective study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of a one-step self-etch adhesive and a "gold-standard" three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious Class-V lesions. The null hypothesis tested was that the one-step self-etch adhesive does perform clinically equally well as the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. A total of 161 lesions in 26 patients were restored with Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray). The restorations were bonded either with the "all-in-one" adhesive Clearfil S3 Bond (Kuraray) or with the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Optibond FL (Kerr). The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months, 1 and 2 years, regarding their retention, marginal adapation, marginal discoloration, caries occurrence, preservation of tooth vitality and post-operative sensivity. Retention loss, severe marginal defects and/or discoloration that needed intervention (repair or replacement) and the occurrence of caries were considered as clinical failures. The recall rate at 2 years was 93.8%. Only one Clearfil S3 Bond restoration was lost at the 2-year recall. All other restorations were clinically acceptable. The number of restorations with defect-free margins decreased severely during the 2-year study period (to 6.7% and 25.3% for Clearfil S3 Bond and Optibond FL, respectively). The Clearfil S3 Bond restorations presented significantly more small marginal defects at the enamel side than the Optibond FL restorations (Clearfil S3 Bond: 93.3%; Optibond FL: 73.3%; p = 0.000). Superficial marginal discoloration increased in both groups (to 53.3% and 36% for Clearfil S3 Bond and Optibond FL, respectively) and was also more pronounced in the Clearfil S3 Bond group (p = 0.007). After 2 years, the simplified one-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil S3 Bond and the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Optibond FL were clinically equally successful, even though both adhesives were characterized by progressive degradation in marginal integrity. Clearfil S3 Bond exhibited more small enamel marginal defects and superficial marginal discolorations.
authors: Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
authors: R Banu
authors: RB
authors: Ermis
authors: Kirsten L
authors: KL
authors: Van Landuyt
authors: Marcio Vivan
authors: MV
authors: Cardoso
authors: Jan
authors: J
authors: De Munck
authors: Bart
authors: B
authors: Van Meerbeek
authors: Marleen
authors: M
authors: Peumans
references: Oper Dent. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):456-60
references: 18666505
references: Dent Mater. 2010 Dec;26(12):1176-84
references: 20947155
references: J Dent. 2009 Feb;37(2):149-55
references: 19058889
references: Oper Dent. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):94-104
references: 20166416
references: Dent Mater. 2008 Jul;24(7):978-85
references: 18199476
references: J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):183-8
references: 15668338
references: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007 Feb;80(2):297-303
references: 16767724
references: J Dent Res. 2004 Jun;83(6):454-8
references: 15153451
references: J Dent Res. 2007 Aug;86(8):739-44
references: 17652202
references: J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(1):32-41; discussion 42
references: 12638771
references: J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Apr;97(4):216-22
references: 17499091
references: Dent Mater. 2008 Jan;24(1):90-101
references: 17442386
references: Oper Dent. 2008 Sep-Oct;33(5):534-49
references: 18833860
references: Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):430-44
references: 11445211
references: Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e100-21
references: 20006379
references: J Dent Res. 2000 Feb;79(2):709-14
references: 10728971
references: J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Feb;55(2):157-63
references: 2937914
references: J Oral Sci. 2007 Sep;49(3):183-9
references: 17928723
references: J Adhes Dent. 2009 Jun;11(3):175-90
references: 19603581
references: J Adhes Dent. 2007;9 Suppl 2:231-40
references: 18340978
references: Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):864-81
references: 16009415
references: Aust Dent J. 2008 Sep;53(3):235-8
references: 18782367
references: J Dent. 2008 Oct;36(10):847-55
references: 18656295
references: Oper Dent. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):217-22
references: 19363978
references: J Adhes Dent. 2006 Dec;8(6):367-73
references: 17243593
references: Biomaterials. 2007 Sep;28(26):3757-85
references: 17543382
references: Dent Mater. 2008 Oct;24(10):1412-9
references: 18433860
references: J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):118-32
references: 15668328
references: Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Dec;113(6):525-30
references: 16324144
references: J Adhes Dent. 2007;9 Suppl 1:117-20
references: 18341238
references: Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Mar;11(1):5-33
references: 17262225
references: Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1066-72
references: 17109951
references: Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):215-35
references: 12760693
references: J Dent. 2008 Feb;36(2):163-9
references: 18248872
references: J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Mar;34(3):213-21
references: 17302950
references: Oper Dent. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):273-8
references: 20533626
references: Dent Mater. 2007 Jun;23(6):749-54
references: 16949661
references: Dent Mater. 2008 Oct;24(10):1316-23
references: 18423839
references: J Dent. 2010 Mar;38(3):191-200
references: 19840829
references: Dent Mater. 2008 Sep;24(9):1258-67
references: 18394694