title: Evaluation of methods for one-dimensional spatial analysis of two-dimensional patterns in mouse chimaeras.
abstract: The relative extent of cell mixing in tissues of mouse chimaeras or mosaics can be studied by comparing the distributions of the two cell populations in the tissues. However, the mean patch size is misleading because it is affected by both the extent of cell mixing and the relative contributions of the two cell populations. Previous work suggested that effects attributable to differences in tissue composition among chimaeras can be factored out either by correcting the mean patch size or by using the median patch size for the minority cell population and restricting the analysis to grossly unbalanced chimaeras. In the present study, computer simulations of two-dimensional mosaic arrays of black and white squares (representing cells) were used to simulate chimaeric tissues. Random arrays simulated tissues with extensive cell mixing, arrays of cell clumps (representing coherent clones) simulated less mixed tissues, and striped arrays simulated tissues with elongated but fragmented descendent clones. The computer simulations predicted that (i) the median patch length (minority cell population) and the corrected mean patch length would both distinguish between random and clumped patterns and (ii) differences in the variation of the composition of two perpendicular series of one-dimensional transects would distinguished between stripes and randomly orientated patches. Both predictions were confirmed by analysis of histological sections of the retinal pigment epithelium from fetal and adult mouse chimaeras. This study demonstrates that two types of non-random two-dimensional variegated patterns (clumps and stripes) can be identified in chimaeras without two-dimensional reconstruction of serial sections.
authors: Division of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, Genes and Development Group, University of Edinburgh, George Square, Edinburgh, UK.
authors: Benjamin A
authors: BA
authors: Hodson
authors: Mathieu
authors: M
authors: Unbekandt
authors: Margaret A
authors: MA
authors: Keighren
authors: Anthea
authors: A
authors: Springbett
authors: John D
authors: JD
authors: West
references: Nature. 1977 Feb 24;265(5596):731-3
references: 859579
references: Cell Tissue Res. 1985;239(2):405-15
references: 3919952
references: Dev Biol. 1971 Oct;26(2):252-63
references: 5158534
references: J Cell Sci. 1986 Mar;81:143-62
references: 3733894
references: Biometrics. 2003 Mar;59(1):186-8; discussion 188
references: 12762456
references: Dev Growth Differ. 1997 Jun;39(3):305-17
references: 9227897
references: J Theor Biol. 1975 Mar;50(1):153-60
references: 1127954
references: J Anat. 2009 Dec;215(6):698-704
references: 19840025
references: Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1971;25:345-70
references: 4940552
references: BMC Dev Biol. 2009 Jan 07;9:4
references: 19128502
references: Curr Top Dev Biol. 1999;44:21-66
references: 9891876
references: Cell Differ. 1986 Jul;19(1):19-33
references: 3755380
references: J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1976 Aug;36(1):151-61
references: 978124
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Apr;45(4):1101-8
references: 15037575
references: Nature. 1961 Jun 3;190:857-60
references: 13775333
references: Dev Biol. 1973 Mar;31(1):195-9
references: 4787188
references: J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985 Aug;88:219-30
references: 3841146
references: J Reprod Fertil. 1994 Jan;100(1):203-10
references: 8182590
references: J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1986 Feb;91:197-208
references: 3711786
references: Dev Biol. 1981 Jul 15;85(1):199-208
references: 7018958
references: J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1964 Dec;12:575-85
references: 14251470
references: Genet Res. 1994 Apr;63(2):87-99
references: 8026741
references: Dev Dyn. 2002 Aug;224(4):432-40
references: 12203735
references: Dev Biol. 1987 May;121(1):205-19
references: 3569659
references: Nature. 1977 Nov 17;270(5634):245-7
references: 593342
references: Dev Biol. 1987 May;121(1):192-204
references: 3569658