title: Preferential feeding by the ciliates Chilodonella and Tetrahymena spp. and effects of these protozoa on bacterial biofilm structure and composition.
abstract: Protozoa are important components of microbial food webs, but protozoan feeding preferences and their effects in the context of bacterial biofilms are not well understood. The feeding interactions of two contrasting ciliates, the free-swimming filter feeder Tetrahymena sp. and the surface-associated predator Chilodonella sp., were investigated using biofilm-forming bacteria genetically modified to express fluorescent proteins. According to microscopy, both ciliates readily consumed cells from both Pseudomonas costantinii and Serratia plymuthica biofilms. When offered a choice between spatially separated biofilms, each ciliate showed a preference for P. costantinii biofilms. Experiments with bacterial cell extracts indicated that both ciliates used dissolved chemical cues to locate biofilms. Chilodonella sp. evidently used bacterial chemical cues as a basis for preferential feeding decisions, but it was unclear whether Tetrahymena sp. did also. Confocal microscopy of live biofilms revealed that Tetrahymena sp. had a major impact on biofilm morphology, forming holes and channels throughout S. plymuthica biofilms and reducing P. costantinii biofilms to isolated, grazing-resistant microcolonies. Grazing by Chilodonella sp. resulted in the development of less-defined trails through S. plymuthica biofilms and caused P. costantinii biofilms to become homogeneous scatterings of cells. It was not clear whether the observed feeding preferences for spatially separated P. costantinii biofilms over S. plymuthica biofilms resulted in selective targeting of P. costantinii cells in mixed biofilms. Grazing of mixed biofilms resulted in the depletion of both types of bacteria, with Tetrahymena sp. having a larger impact than Chilodonella sp., and effects similar to those seen in grazed single-species biofilms.
authors: School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
authors: Andrew
authors: A
authors: Dopheide
authors: Gavin
authors: G
authors: Lear
authors: Rebecca
authors: R
authors: Stott
authors: Gillian
authors: G
authors: Lewis
references: Nature. 2003 Nov 27;426(6965):439-42
references: 14647381
references: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001 Apr;35(2):113-121
references: 11295449
references: Int Rev Cytol. 1978;53:145-210
references: 97241
references: Microb Ecol. 2003 May;45(4):384-98
references: 12704556
references: Microb Ecol. 1999 Feb;37(2):95-106
references: 9929398
references: Annu Rev Physiol. 1992;54:639-63
references: 1562186
references: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2009 Mar-Apr;56(2):188-93
references: 21462552
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Nov;72(11):7294-300
references: 16997989
references: Environ Microbiol. 2004 Mar;6(3):218-26
references: 14871206
references: Microb Ecol. 2001 Oct;42(3):217-227
references: 12024247
references: Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jun;8(6):1017-25
references: 16689722
references: Microb Ecol. 1992 May;23(3):211-25
references: 24192932
references: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Jul;3(7):537-46
references: 15953930
references: PLoS One. 2008 Jul 23;3(7):e2744
references: 18648491
references: Adv Appl Microbiol. 2004;54:167-96
references: 15251281
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jan;72(1):78-86
references: 16391028
references: Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct;7(10):1593-601
references: 16156732
references: J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2001 Mar 15;257(2):281-296
references: 11245881
references: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;56(5):466-71
references: 19737200
references: Protist. 1999 Oct;150(3):325-36
references: 10575704
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Apr;64(4):1264-9
references: 9546161
references: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Aug;69(2):158-69
references: 19519785
references: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2007 May-Jun;54(3):271-4
references: 17552982
references: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002;56:187-209
references: 12142477
references: Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jul;6(7):726-32
references: 15186351
references: Protist. 2010 Oct;161(4):577-88
references: 20471910
references: Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 1996;43(1):83-91
references: 8806947
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Feb;71(2):921-9
references: 15691949
references: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54:49-79
references: 11018124
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jun;64(6):2240-6
references: 9603842
references: Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;8(2):200-13
references: 16423009
references: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;81(1-4):293-308
references: 12448728
references: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005 Apr;8(2):222-7
references: 15802256
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar;74(6):1740-7
references: 18223112
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;71(5):2663-76
references: 15870358
references: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;81(1-4):465-80
references: 12448743
references: Microb Ecol. 2007 Jan;53(1):66-73
references: 17186152
references: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Dec;4(12):887-99
references: 17109029
references: J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98(1):238-44
references: 15610437
references: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;81(1-4):413-34
references: 12448740
references: Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007 Oct;45(4):364-70
references: 17897377
references: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 May 1;52(3):351-63
references: 16329920
references: J Microbiol Methods. 2001 Jul;45(3):187-95
references: 11348676