title: The effects of massage on pain, stiffness, and fatigue levels associated with ankylosing spondylitis: a case study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To study the effects of massage on pain, stiffness, and fatigue in a patient recently diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
  
  
  METHODS
  A 47-year-old woman with AS diagnosed 11 months earlier received 7 massages across a 28-day period. Her pain, stiffness, and fatigue were recorded using visual analogue scales daily during the study period. Spinal mobility was measured at each massage session with finger-to-floor measurements for both forward and lateral flexion. The client also used a daily journal to supply pertinent information on quality of life.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Improvement was recorded in all dependent variables, with stiffness intensity showing the greatest improvement, to a final value of 0.75 from an initial value of 5. Duration of stiffness also showed improvement, to a final value of 1.2 from an initial value of 3.5. Improvement was also found in general pain (final value: 1; initial value: 4), fatigue (final value: 1.5; initial value 5), and forward and lateral flexion (forward flexion distance-final: 4 inches; initial: 6 inches; lateral flexion, left distance: final, 16.5 inches; initial, 21 inches; right distance: final, 16.5 inches; initial, 20.5 inches).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Massage shows promise as a treatment for symptoms associated with AS. Further study is needed to validate these effects and to determine the feasibility of massage as an adjunct to standard care for AS patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms of AS.
authors: Shamrock Therapeutics LLC, Plano, Texas, USA.
authors: Rosemary
authors: R
authors: Chunco
references: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S47-58
references: 22588768
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jul;66(7):910-5
references: 17329306
references: Joint Bone Spine. 2009 Jul;76(4):378-82
references: 19525138
references: Scand J Rheumatol. 2006 Jul-Aug;35(4):283-9
references: 16882592
references: J Rheumatol. 2005 Oct;32(10):1899-906
references: 16206344
references: Psychol Bull. 2004 Jan;130(1):3-18
references: 14717648
references: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Jan;49(1):73-81
references: 19605374
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Dec;61 Suppl 3:iii8-18
references: 12381506
references: J Rheumatol. 2010 Jun;37(6):1211-3
references: 20395642
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD001929
references: 18843627
references: Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Sep;28(9):1045-51
references: 19504231
references: Immunol Today. 1990 Apr;11(4):137-42
references: 2187471