title: United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards for high-quality mammography, including standards for mammographic X-ray equipment, patient dose, clinical image quality, and related technical parameters. The MQSA also requires minimum qualifications for radiologic technologists, interpreting physicians and medical physicists, mandates acceptable practices for quality-control, quality-assurance, and requires processes to audit medical outcomes. This paper presents the findings of MQSA inspections of facilities, which characterize significant factors affecting mammography quality in the United States.
  
  
  METHODS
  Trained inspectors collected data regarding X-ray technical factors, made exposure measurements for the determination of mean glandular dose (MGD), evaluated image quality, and inspected the quality of the film-processing environment. The average annual facility and total U.S. screening exam workloads were computed using workload data reported by facilities.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mammography facilities have made technical improvements as evidenced by a narrower distribution of doses, higher phantom-film background optical densities associated with higher phantom image-quality scores, and better film processing. It is estimated that approximately 36 million screening mammography exams were conducted in 2006, a rate that is almost triple the exam volume estimated for 1997. Digital mammography (DM) is now in use at approximately 14% (1,191 of 8,834) of MQSA-certified mammography facilities. The results indicate that DM can offer lower dose to the patient while providing comparable or better image quality.
authors: Division of Mammography Quality and Radiation Programs, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, United States.
authors: Dc
authors: D
authors: Spelic
authors: Rv
authors: R
authors: Kaczmarek
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Hilohi
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Belella
references: Br J Radiol. 2005 Mar;78(927):207-18
references: 15730985
references: Radiology. 1991 Apr;179(1):143-8
references: 2006265
references: Lancet. 2000 Jan 8;355(9198):129-34
references: 10675181
references: Radiology. 1999 Feb;210(2):345-51
references: 10207413
references: Radiol Clin North Am. 2004 Sep;42(5):807-19, v
references: 15337417
references: Med Phys. 2000 May;27(5):854-60
references: 10841387
references: Radiology. 1994 May;191(2):323-30
references: 8153301
references: Eur Radiol. 2006 Nov;16(11):2559-66
references: 16733678
references: Med Phys. 2002 May;29(5):830-4
references: 12033579
references: N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1784-92
references: 16251534
references: Br J Radiol. 2003 Apr;76(904):238-45
references: 12711643
references: N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83
references: 16169887
references: Med Phys. 2001 Nov;28(11):2297-301
references: 11764036
references: Radiology. 1979 Jul;132(1):197-200
references: 451199
references: Phys Med Biol. 2006 Apr 7;51(7):1807-17
references: 16552106