title: Allocating logging rights in Peruvian Amazonia--does it matter to be local?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The fate of tropical forests is a global concern, yet many far-reaching decisions affecting forest resources are made locally. We explore allocation of logging rights using a case study from Loreto, Peruvian Amazonia, where millions of hectares of tropical rainforest were offered for concession in a competitive tendering process that addressed issues related to locality.
  
  
  RESULTS
  After briefly presenting the study area and the tendering process, we identify and define local and non-local actors taking part in the concession process. We then analyse their tenders, results of the tendering, and attributes of the concession areas. Our results show that there was more offer than demand for concession land in the tendering. The number of tenders the concession areas received was related to their size and geographic location in relation to the major cities, but not to their estimated timber volumes or median distances from transport routes. Small and Loreto-based actors offered lower yearly area-based fees compared to larger ones, but the offers did not significantly affect the results of the tenders. Local experience in the form of logging history or residence near the solicited concession areas, as well as being registered in the region of Loreto, improved the success of the tenders.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The allocation process left a considerable number of forest areas under the management of small and local actors, and if Peru is to reach its goal of zero deforestation rate by safeguarding 75 per cent of its forests by 2020, the small and the local actors need to be integrated to the forest regime as important constituents of its legitimacy.
authors: Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. mattsal@utu.fi
authors: Matti
authors: M
authors: Salo
authors: Samuli
authors: S
authors: Helle
authors: Tuuli
authors: T
authors: Toivonen
references: PLoS One. 2010 Jan 19;5(1):e8767
references: 20098736
references: Science. 2008 Jan 11;319(5860):169-72
references: 18048654
references: Stat Med. 2009 Jan 30;28(2):205-20
references: 18991332
references: Environ Manage. 2009 Oct;44(4):609-23
references: 19669830
references: Environ Manage. 2008 Aug;42(2):327-43
references: 18521660
references: Science. 2011 Mar 25;331(6024):1606-8
references: 21436453
references: Am Nat. 2009 Jan;173(1):119-23
references: 19049440
references: Ecol Appl. 2007 Mar;17(2):323-30
references: 17489241
references: Science. 2007 Aug 31;317(5842):1233-6
references: 17690260
references: J Environ Manage. 2009 Feb;90(2):1145-53
references: 18614273