title: Medical physics aspects of cancer care in the Asia Pacific region.
abstract: Medical physics plays an essential role in modern medicine. This is particularly evident in cancer care where medical physicists are involved in radiotherapy treatment planning and quality assurance as well as in imaging and radiation protection. Due to the large variety of tasks and interests, medical physics is often subdivided into specialties such as radiology, nuclear medicine and radiation oncology medical physics. However, even within their specialty, the role of radiation oncology medical physicists (ROMPs) is diverse and varies between different societies. Therefore, a questionnaire was sent to leading medical physicists in most countries/areas in the Asia/Pacific region to determine the education, role and status of medical physicists.Answers were received from 17 countries/areas representing nearly 2800 radiation oncology medical physicists. There was general agreement that medical physicists should have both academic (typically at MSc level) and clinical (typically at least 2 years) training. ROMPs spent most of their time working in radiotherapy treatment planning (average 17 hours per week); however radiation protection and engineering tasks were also common. Typically, only physicists in large centres are involved in research and teaching. Most respondents thought that the workload of physicists was high, with more than 500 patients per year per physicist, less than one ROMP per two oncologists being the norm, and on average, one megavoltage treatment unit per medical physicist.There was also a clear indication of increased complexity of technology in the region with many countries/areas reporting to have installed helical tomotherapy, IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy), IGRT (Image Guided Radiation Therapy), Gamma-knife and Cyber-knife units. This and the continued workload from brachytherapy will require growing expertise and numbers in the medical physics workforce. Addressing these needs will be an important challenge for the future.
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Kron
authors: Ky
authors: K
authors: Cheung
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Dai
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Ravindran
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Soejoko
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Inamura
authors: Jy
authors: J
authors: Song
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Bold
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Srivastava
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Rodriguez
authors: Tj
authors: T
authors: Wong
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Kumara
authors: Cc
authors: C
authors: Lee
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Krisanachinda
authors: Xc
authors: X
authors: Nguyen
authors: Kh
authors: Kh
authors: Ng
references: Radiother Oncol. 2004 Oct;73(1):97-100
references: 15465152
references: Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2007 Apr;3(2):e27
references: 21614274
references: Med Phys. 1999 Sep;26(9):1847-70
references: 10505874
references: Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2007 Mar;30(1):13-24
references: 17508597
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Apr;1(4):280-2
references: 17411581
references: Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 1997 Sep;20(3 Suppl):1-35
references: 9485606
references: Ann ICRP. 2000;30(3):7-70
references: 11711147
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):795-8
references: 18262091
references: Med Phys. 1998 Oct;25(10):1773-829
references: 9800687
references: Radiother Oncol. 2004 Feb;70(2):125-35
references: 15028400
references: Z Med Phys. 2008;18(1):1-3
references: 18524382
references: Med Phys. 1994 Apr;21(4):581-618
references: 8058027
references: Med Phys. 2005 Jan;32(1):263-7
references: 15719977