title: The SmartHand transradial prosthesis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Prosthetic components and control interfaces for upper limb amputees have barely changed in the past 40 years. Many transradial prostheses have been developed in the past, nonetheless most of them would be inappropriate if/when a large bandwidth human-machine interface for control and perception would be available, due to either their limited (or inexistent) sensorization or limited dexterity. SmartHand tackles this issue as is meant to be clinically experimented in amputees employing different neuro-interfaces, in order to investigate their effectiveness. This paper presents the design and on bench evaluation of the SmartHand.
  
  
  METHODS
  SmartHand design was bio-inspired in terms of its physical appearance, kinematics, sensorization, and its multilevel control system. Underactuated fingers and differential mechanisms were designed and exploited in order to fit all mechatronic components in the size and weight of a natural human hand. Its sensory system was designed with the aim of delivering significant afferent information to the user through adequate interfaces.
  
  
  RESULTS
  SmartHand is a five fingered self-contained robotic hand, with 16 degrees of freedom, actuated by 4 motors. It integrates a bio-inspired sensory system composed of 40 proprioceptive and exteroceptive sensors and a customized embedded controller both employed for implementing automatic grasp control and for potentially delivering sensory feedback to the amputee. It is able to perform everyday grasps, count and independently point the index. The weight (530 g) and speed (closing time: 1.5 seconds) are comparable to actual commercial prostheses. It is able to lift a 10 kg suitcase; slippage tests showed that within particular friction and geometric conditions the hand is able to stably grasp up to 3.6 kg cylindrical objects.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Due to its unique embedded features and human-size, the SmartHand holds the promise to be experimentally fitted on transradial amputees and employed as a bi-directional instrument for investigating -during realistic experiments- different interfaces, control and feedback strategies in neuro-engineering studies.
authors: The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera (PI), Italy. ch.cipriani@sssup.it
authors: Christian
authors: C
authors: Cipriani
authors: Marco
authors: M
authors: Controzzi
authors: Maria Chiara
authors: MC
authors: Carrozza
references: Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Dec;31(4):362-70
references: 18050007
references: Technol Health Care. 1999;7(6):401-9
references: 10665673
references: Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993 Apr;17(1):56-64
references: 8337101
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009 Nov;56(11 Pt 2):2739-43
references: 19758852
references: Med Eng Phys. 2000 Dec;22(10):679-84
references: 11334753
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 1973;44(4):389-409
references: 4771275
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):20061-6
references: 18048339
references: Ergonomics. 1992 Mar;35(3):261-73
references: 1572336
references: Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995 Jun;29(2):167-76
references: 7569815
references: Brain. 2008 Dec;131(Pt 12):3443-52
references: 19074189
references: Artif Organs. 2004 Nov;28(11):980-6
references: 15504113
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 May;121(5):777-83
references: 20110193
references: Biol Cybern. 2006 Dec;95(6):629-44
references: 17149592
references: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Dec;90(6):3702-10
references: 12954607
references: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 Dec;13(4):468-72
references: 16425828
references: Neurosurg Focus. 2006 May 15;20(5):E3
references: 16711660
references: South Med J. 2002 Aug;95(8):875-83
references: 12190225
references: Hand Clin. 2001 Aug;17(3):481-8, ix-x
references: 11599215
references: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;2004:4260-3
references: 17271245