title: Porcine ex vivo liver phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography: development and initial results.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  : To demonstrate the feasibility of developing a fixed, dual-input, biologic liver phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging and to report initial results of use of the phantom for quantitative CT perfusion imaging.
  
  
  METHODS
  : Porcine livers were obtained from completed surgical studies and perfused with saline and fixative. The phantom was placed in a body-shaped, CT-compatible acrylic container and connected to a perfusion circuit fitted with a contrast injection port. Flow-controlled contrast-enhanced imaging experiments were performed using 128-slice and 64-slice dual-source multidetector CT scanners. CT angiography protocols were used to obtain portal venous and hepatic arterial vascular enhancement, reproduced over a period of 4 to 6 months. CT perfusion protocols were used at different input flow rates to correlate input flow with calculated tissue perfusion, to test reproducibility, and to determine the feasibility of simultaneous dual-input liver perfusion. Histologic analysis of the liver phantom was also performed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  : CT angiogram 3-dimensional reconstructions demonstrated homogenous tertiary and quaternary branching of the portal venous system to the periphery of all lobes of the liver as well as enhancement of the hepatic arterial system to all lobes of the liver and gallbladder throughout the study period. For perfusion CT, the correlation between the calculated mean tissue perfusion in a volume of interest and input pump flow rate was excellent (R = 0.996) and color blood flow maps demonstrated variations in regional perfusion in a narrow range. Repeat perfusion CT experiments demonstrated reproducible time-attenuation curves, and dual-input perfusion CT experiments demonstrated that simultaneous dual input liver perfusion is feasible. Histologic analysis demonstrated that the hepatic microvasculature and architecture appeared intact and well preserved at the completion of 4 to 6 months of laboratory experiments and contrast-enhanced imaging.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  : We have demonstrated successful development of a porcine liver phantom using a flow-controlled extracorporeal perfusion circuit. This phantom exhibited reproducible dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the hepatic arterial and portal venous system over a 4- to 6-month period.
authors: Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP), College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. thompson.scott@mayo.edu
authors: Scott M
authors: SM
authors: Thompson
authors: Juan C
authors: JC
authors: Ramirez-Giraldo
authors: Bruce
authors: B
authors: Knudsen
authors: Joseph P
authors: JP
authors: Grande
authors: Jodie A
authors: JA
authors: Christner
authors: Man
authors: M
authors: Xu
authors: David A
authors: DA
authors: Woodrum
authors: Cynthia H
authors: CH
authors: McCollough
authors: Matthew R
authors: MR
authors: Callstrom
references: Int Rev Physiol. 1980;21:1-63
references: 6993392
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Jan;31(1):2-3
references: 19892810
references: Rofo. 2010 Oct;182(10):883-90
references: 20563961
references: Invest Radiol. 2011 Jan;46(1):64-70
references: 20881865
references: Eur J Cancer. 2002 Nov;38(16):2079-84
references: 12387833
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Dec;191(6):W288-92
references: 19020217
references: Phys Med Biol. 1991 Oct;36(10):1407-13
references: 1745664
references: Br J Radiol. 2009 Jul;82(979):561-70
references: 19221186
references: Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):250-5
references: 12511698
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):691-5
references: 19942712
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Nov;57(11):
references: 20601306
references: World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec 28;16(48):6046-57
references: 21182219
references: Invest Radiol. 2010 Jul;45(7):419-26
references: 20498611
references: Surg Endosc. 2007 Oct;21(10):1745-9
references: 17332954
references: NMR Biomed. 2009 Oct;22(8):843-51
references: 19562728
references: Radiology. 1980 Dec;137(3):679-86
references: 7003648
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Jun-Jul;22(6):1077-80
references: 11415901
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998 Sep;24(7):1033-43
references: 9809637
references: Invest Radiol. 2010 Jul;45(7):378-86
references: 20440213
references: Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):32-61
references: 20574084
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jul;185(1):225-31
references: 15972428
references: Z Med Phys. 2007;17(3):205-11
references: 17879818
references: Fed Proc. 1982 Apr;41(6):2111-6
references: 6804268
references: Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 Jan;47(1):161-78
references: 19195541
references: J Neuroradiol. 2008 Dec;35(5):253-60
references: 18466974
references: Radiology. 2004 Jun;231(3):632-44
references: 15118110
references: Radiology. 2010 Jan;254(1):200-9
references: 20032153
references: Invest Radiol. 2011 Apr;46(4):271-6
references: 21368589
references: J Surg Res. 2011 Nov;171(1):87-93
references: 20462596
references: Radiology. 2009 Oct;253(1):98-105
references: 19789255
references: Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):897-906
references: 20229899
references: Invest Radiol. 2010 Jul;45(7):427-36
references: 20440211
references: Invest Radiol. 2010 Sep;45(9):529-37
references: 20661143
references: J Surg Res. 2011 Jun 1;168(1):56-61
references: 20031170
references: Invest Radiol. 2009 Oct;44(10):676-82
references: 19724231
references: Eur J Radiol. 1999 Jun;30(3):170-84
references: 10452715
references: Magn Reson Med Sci. 2007;6(2):91-7
references: 17690539
references: Br J Radiol. 1991 May;64(761):409-12
references: 2036562
references: Imaging Med. 2009 Oct;1(1):65-84
references: 22308169
references: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):59-63
references: 15665684
references: Br J Radiol. 2004 Sep;77(921):728-34
references: 15447957
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994;20(3):309-14
references: 8059492
references: Am J Physiol. 1992 Nov;263(5 Pt 2):F963-73
references: 1443185