title: Evaluation of sexual communication message strategies.
abstract: Parent-child communication about sex is an important proximal reproductive health outcome. But while campaigns to promote it such as the Parents Speak Up National Campaign (PSUNC) have been effective, little is known about how messages influence parental cognitions and behavior. This study examines which message features explain responses to sexual communication messages. We content analyzed 4 PSUNC ads to identify specific, measurable message and advertising execution features. We then develop quantitative measures of those features, including message strategies, marketing strategies, and voice and other stylistic features, and merged the resulting data into a dataset drawn from a national media tracking survey of the campaign. Finally, we conducted multivariable logistic regression models to identify relationships between message content and ad reactions/receptivity, and between ad reactions/receptivity and parents' cognitions related to sexual communication included in the campaign's conceptual model. We found that overall parents were highly receptive to the PSUNC ads. We did not find significant associations between message content and ad reactions/receptivity. However, we found that reactions/receptivity to specific PSUNC ads were associated with increased norms, self-efficacy, short- and long-term expectations about parent-child sexual communication, as theorized in the conceptual model. This study extends previous research and methods to analyze message content and reactions/receptivity. The results confirm and extend previous PSUNC campaign evaluation and provide further evidence for the conceptual model. Future research should examine additional message content features and the effects of reactions/receptivity.
authors: The George Washington University, School of Public Health and Health Services, Department of Prevention and Community Health, 2175 K Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20037, USA. wdevans@gwu.edu
authors: W Douglas
authors: WD
authors: Evans
authors: Kevin C
authors: KC
authors: Davis
authors: Cindy
authors: C
authors: Umanzor
authors: Kajal
authors: K
authors: Patel
authors: Munziba
authors: M
authors: Khan
references: J Health Commun. 2002 Oct-Dec;7(5):445-53
references: 12455763
references: J Health Commun. 2004;9 Suppl 1:71-96
references: 14960405
references: Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):143-64
references: 15090118
references: Am J Public Health. 2007 Sep;97(9):1644-9
references: 17395843
references: J Adolesc Health. 2002 Dec;31(6 Suppl):264-79
references: 12470924
references: New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2002 Fall;(97):9-41
references: 14964942
references: J Health Commun. 2005 Mar;10(2):127-43
references: 15804904
references: Reprod Health. 2010 Jul 21;7:17
references: 20663160
references: J Fam Issues. 1998 May;19(3):315-33
references: 12295941
references: Child Abuse Negl. 1998 Nov;22(11):1167-75
references: 9827320
references: J Sex Res. 2003 Aug;40(3):256-65
references: 14533020
references: J Adolesc Health. 2009 Oct;45(4):409-16
references: 19766947
references: Tob Control. 2000 Dec;9(4):401-7
references: 11106710
references: Am J Health Behav. 2011 Jul;35(4):428-37
references: 22040589
references: Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;27(6):760-9
references: 19025272
references: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Dec;161(12):1123-9
references: 18056556
references: Tob Control. 2011 Jan;20(1):26-33
references: 20852323
references: J Pediatr Psychol. 2006 Oct;31(9):917-27
references: 16452645
references: Hum Commun Res. 1998 Mar;24(3):454-68
references: 12293438