title: Optimizing cost-efficiency in mean exposure assessment--cost functions reconsidered.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Reliable exposure data is a vital concern in medical epidemiology and intervention studies. The present study addresses the needs of the medical researcher to spend monetary resources devoted to exposure assessment with an optimal cost-efficiency, i.e. obtain the best possible statistical performance at a specified budget. A few previous studies have suggested mathematical optimization procedures based on very simple cost models; this study extends the methodology to cover even non-linear cost scenarios.
  
  
  METHODS
  Statistical performance, i.e. efficiency, was assessed in terms of the precision of an exposure mean value, as determined in a hierarchical, nested measurement model with three stages. Total costs were assessed using a corresponding three-stage cost model, allowing costs at each stage to vary non-linearly with the number of measurements according to a power function. Using these models, procedures for identifying the optimally cost-efficient allocation of measurements under a constrained budget were developed, and applied on 225 scenarios combining different sizes of unit costs, cost function exponents, and exposure variance components.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Explicit mathematical rules for identifying optimal allocation could be developed when cost functions were linear, while non-linear cost functions implied that parts of or the entire optimization procedure had to be carried out using numerical methods.For many of the 225 scenarios, the optimal strategy consisted in measuring on only one occasion from each of as many subjects as allowed by the budget. Significant deviations from this principle occurred if costs for recruiting subjects were large compared to costs for setting up measurement occasions, and, at the same time, the between-subjects to within-subject variance ratio was small. In these cases, non-linearities had a profound influence on the optimal allocation and on the eventual size of the exposure data set.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The analysis procedures developed in the present study can be used for informed design of exposure assessment strategies, provided that data are available on exposure variability and the costs of collecting and processing data. The present shortage of empirical evidence on costs and appropriate cost functions however impedes general conclusions on optimal exposure measurement strategies in different epidemiologic scenarios.
authors: Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, University of Gävle, Sweden. smn@hig.se
authors: Svend Erik
authors: SE
authors: Mathiassen
authors: Kristian
authors: K
authors: Bolin
references: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004 Aug;14(4):443-54
references: 15165594
references: Occup Environ Med. 2005 May;62(5):344-50
references: 15837857
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 1993 Jun;37(3):253-70
references: 8346874
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 1997 Jan;41(1):63-76
references: 9072951
references: J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1997 Oct-Dec;7(4):439-70
references: 9306231
references: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 04;8:43
references: 18601730
references: Ergonomics. 2001 Feb 20;44(3):339-53
references: 11219764
references: Ergonomics. 2003 Jun 20;46(8):800-24
references: 12745980
references: J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2005 Nov;15(6):464-72
references: 15886716
references: Am J Ind Med. 2004 Jan;45(1):113-22
references: 14691975
references: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006 Apr;16(2):125-36
references: 16102977
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2003 Mar;47(2):95-9
references: 12581994
references: AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002 Jan-Feb;63(1):29-33
references: 11843422
references: Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1985 Aug;46(8):427-33
references: 4050679
references: Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jan;62(1):18-27
references: 15613604
references: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009 Feb;6(2):113-20
references: 19085603
references: Biometrics. 2003 Dec;59(4):1107-12
references: 14969491
references: Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993 May;54(5):211-20
references: 8498356
references: J Occup Environ Med. 1996 Jan;38(1):39-45
references: 8871330
references: Risk Anal. 1997 Jun;17(3):279-92
references: 9232013
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Jun;50(4):343-57
references: 16513810
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2001 Jan;45(1):71-81
references: 11137701
references: Ergonomics. 2005 Jul 15;48(9):1200-19
references: 16251156
references: Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1994 Nov;55(11):1021-9
references: 7992794
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Nov;54(8):858-68
references: 20926518
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 May;55(4):436-49
references: 21486917
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2001 Jun;45(4):257-73
references: 11378147
references: Ergonomics. 1994 Jun;37(6):979-88
references: 8026455
references: Sci Total Environ. 1995 Jun 16;168(2):187-94
references: 7481737
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 1998 Feb;42(2):115-9
references: 9559571
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 1999 Oct;43(7):457-69
references: 10582029
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Jul;54(5):584-94
references: 20385661
references: Ergonomics. 2001 May 15;44(6):588-613
references: 11373023
references: Stat Med. 1987 Sep;6(6):647-55
references: 3685720
references: Am J Ind Med. 2007 Sep;50(9):687-96
references: 17680639
references: Epidemiology. 2004 May;15(3):293-9
references: 15097009
references: Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Apr;22(2):94-101
references: 8738886
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 1994 Aug;38(4):361-72
references: 7978960
references: Health Econ. 1997 Jul-Aug;6(4):327-40
references: 9285227
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Aug 1;142(3):353-62
references: 7631639
references: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002 Feb;12(1):45-57
references: 11804811
references: Occup Environ Med. 2002 May;59(5):349-54; quiz 354,286
references: 11983852
references: Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Feb;21(1):15-23
references: 7784859
references: J Environ Monit. 2005 Jun;7(6):603-7
references: 15931422
references: Ergonomics. 2004 Jan 15;47(1):19-40
references: 14660216
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Jun;50(4):371-7
references: 16467435
references: AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2003 Mar-Apr;64(2):196-211
references: 12688844
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jun;55(5):537-47
references: 21467124
references: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Oct;19(5):1005-12
references: 18760937
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Jul;53(5):509-21
references: 19460758
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Jul 15;144(2):192-7
references: 8678052
references: Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1996 Jan;57(1):6-15
references: 8588553
references: AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2003 Nov-Dec;64(6):823-9
references: 14674795
references: Am J Ind Med. 1995 Feb;27(2):171-85
references: 7755008
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Oct 1;166(7):832-40
references: 17670910
references: Biometrics. 1991 Sep;47(3):851-69
references: 1789885
references: Clin Chim Acta. 2001 Dec;314(1-2):55-66
references: 11718679
references: Ergonomics. 2009 Sep;52(9):1067-78
references: 19787510
references: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Oct;29(5):347-53
references: 14584515
references: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001 Apr;27(2):125-32
references: 11409595
references: Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2157-77
references: 9802176
references: Ergonomics. 2009 Dec;52(12):1540-55
references: 19941186
references: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005 Apr;31(2):138-51
references: 15864908
references: Occup Environ Med. 1998 May;55(5):291-9
references: 9764106
references: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Jun;19(3):416-27
references: 18155593
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 2002 Jan;46(1):69-77
references: 12005135
references: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007 Oct;33(5):358-67
references: 17973062
references: Appl Ergon. 2010 Mar;41(2):295-304
references: 19793578
references: Ann Occup Hyg. 1995 Aug;39(4):469-95
references: 7661513