title: The minimum legal drinking age and public health.
abstract: The Amethyst Initiative, signed by more than 100 college presidents and other higher education officials calls for a reexamination of the minimum legal drinking age in the United States. A central argument of the initiative is that the U.S. minimum legal drinking age policy results in more dangerous drinking than would occur if the legal drinking age were lower. A companion organization called Choose Responsibility explicitly proposes "a series of changes that will allow 18-20 year-olds to purchase, possess and consume alcoholic beverages." Does the age-21 drinking limit in the United States reduce alcohol consumption by young adults and its harms, or as the signatories of the Amethyst Initiative contend, is it "not working"? In this paper, we summarize a large and compelling body of empirical evidence which shows that one of the central claims of the signatories of the Amethyst Initiative is incorrect: setting the minimum legal drinking age at 21 clearly reduces alcohol consumption and its major harms. We use a panel fixed effects approach and a regression discontinuity approach to estimate the effects of the minimum legal drinking age on mortality, and we also discuss what is known about the relationship between the minimum legal drinking age and other adverse outcomes such as nonfatal injury and crime. We document the effect of the minimum legal drinking age on alcohol consumption and estimate the costs of adverse alcohol-related events on a per-drink basis. Finally we consider implications for the correct choice of a minimum legal drinking age.
authors: Paul Merage School of Business, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. kittc@uci.edu
authors: Christopher
authors: C
authors: Carpenter
authors: Carlos
authors: C
authors: Dobkin
references: J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002 Mar;(14):206-25
references: 12022726
references: Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Jul;35(4):579-87
references: 12729821
references: Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1365-8
references: 10474554
references: Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2009 Jan 1;1(1):164-182
references: 20351794
references: J Health Econ. 1996 Aug;15(4):435-54
references: 10164038
references: J Health Econ. 2005 May;24(3):613-28
references: 15811546
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jan-Feb;25(1):57-69
references: 16403745
references: J Health Econ. 2004 Jan;23(1):61-83
references: 15154688
references: Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1988 Jun;9(2):149-50
references: 3381794
references: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Apr;22(2 Suppl):4S-14S
references: 9603301
references: J Health Econ. 1988 Mar;7(1):1-24
references: 10288441
references: J Health Econ. 2009 May;28(3):737-47
references: 19345434
references: J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;29(1):62-77
references: 19945186