title: Patient discomfort associated with the use of intra-arterial iodinated contrast media: a meta-analysis of comparative randomized controlled trials.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Discomfort characterized by pain and warmth are common adverse effects associated with the use of intra-arterial iodinated contrast media (CM). The objective of this review was to pool patient-reported outcomes available from head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to compare the discomfort rates associated with iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM; i.e., iodixanol) to those reported with various low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM).
  
  
  METHODS
  A review of the literature published between 1990 and 2009 available through Medline, Medline Preprints, Embase, Biological Abstracts, BioBase, Cab Abstracts, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Life Sciences Collection, Inside Conferences, Energy Database, Engineering Index and Technology Collection was performed to compare rates of discomfort associated with the use of the IOCM (iodixanol) vs. various LOCM agents in head-to-head RCTs. All trials with a Jadad score ≥2 that reported patient discomfort data following intra-arterial administration of CM were reviewed, coded, and extracted.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 22 RCTs (n = 8087) were included. Overall discomfort (regardless of severity) was significantly different between patients receiving IOCM and various LOCMs (risk difference [RD] -0.049; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.076, -0.021; p = 0.001). IOCM was favored over all LOCMs combined with a summary RD value of -0.188 (95% CI: -0.265, -0.112; p < 0.001) for incidence of pain, regardless of severity. A greater reduction in the magnitude of pain was observed with IOCM (iodixanol), particularly with selective limb and carotid/intracerebral procedures. Similarly, the meta-analysis of warmth sensation, regardless of severity, favored IOCM over LOCMs with an RD of -0.043 (95% CI: -0.074, -0.011; p = 0.008). A positive linear relationship was observed between the discomfort effect size and age and a negative relationship with increasing proportion of women. The opposite trends were observed with warmth sensation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  IOCM was associated with less frequent and severe patient discomfort during intra-arterial administration. These data support differences in osmolality as a possible determinant of CM discomfort.
authors: St, John Providence Health System, Department of Medicine, Cardiology Section, Providence Park Heart Institute, Novi, MI, USA. peteramccullough@gmail.com
authors: Peter A
authors: PA
authors: McCullough
authors: Patrizio
authors: P
authors: Capasso
references: Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
references: 3802833
references: Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jul 1;74(1):57-63
references: 8017308
references: Int J Cardiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;76(2-3):173-80
references: 11104872
references: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1997 Jul-Aug;20(4):251-6
references: 9211770
references: Invest Radiol. 1999 May;34(5):374-80
references: 10226851
references: Eur J Radiol. 1993 Nov;17(3):203-9
references: 8293750
references: BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
references: 9310563
references: Acta Radiol. 1994 Nov;35(6):614-8
references: 7946687
references: Invest Radiol. 2006 Aug;41(8):651-60
references: 16829749
references: J Intensive Care Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;20(2):63-75
references: 15855219
references: J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Mar;15(3):133-8
references: 12612387
references: Br J Radiol. 1995 Sep;68(813):973-8
references: 7496696
references: Clin Pharm. 1986 Nov;5(11):877-91
references: 3780159
references: Clin Radiol. 1993 Feb;47(2):96-9
references: 8435972
references: Acta Radiol. 2003 Nov;44(6):590-6
references: 14616202
references: Acta Radiol. 1994 Nov;35(6):629-31
references: 7946690
references: Am Heart J. 2001 Apr;141(4):677-83
references: 11275937
references: Clin Radiol. 1993 Oct;48(4):268-72
references: 8243006
references: Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101
references: 7786990
references: Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
references: 8721797
references: Acta Radiol. 1999 May;40(3):291-5
references: 10335967
references: Neuroradiology. 1995 Oct;37(7):512-4
references: 8570043
references: Kidney Int. 2005 Nov;68(5):2256-63
references: 16221227
references: Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2006 Sep;4(5):655-61
references: 17081087
references: Invest Radiol. 1994 Jun;29 Suppl 2:S43-4
references: 7928268
references: Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov;13(11):1394-404
references: 17070458
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 1;54(23):2205-41
references: 19942100
references: Eur Radiol. 1996;6 Suppl 2:S20-4
references: 8798052
references: Invest Radiol. 1985 Jan-Feb;20(1 Suppl):S108-11
references: 3882612
references: J Radiol. 1999 Jul;80(7):727-32
references: 10431273
references: Acta Radiol. 1993 Jan;34(1):72-7
references: 8427753
references: Neuroradiology. 1995 Jan;37(1):48-50
references: 7708189
references: Acta Radiol. 1993 May;34(3):242-5
references: 8489836
references: Acad Radiol. 1996 Sep;3 Suppl 3:S507-13
references: 8883529
references: Acad Radiol. 1996 Sep;3 Suppl 3:S514-8
references: 8883530
references: Eur Radiol. 2007 Dec;17 Suppl 6:F33-7
references: 18376455