title: Clinical vocabulary as a boundary object in multidisciplinary care management of multiple chemical sensitivity, a complex and chronic condition.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Research has shown that accurate and timely communication between multidisciplinary clinicians involved in the care of complex and chronic health conditions is often challenging. The domain knowledge for these conditions is heterogeneous, with poorly categorized, unstructured, and inconsistent clinical vocabulary. The potential of boundary object as a technique to bridge communication gaps is explored in this study.
  
  
  METHODS
  A standardized and controlled clinical vocabulary was developed as a boundary object in the domain of a complex and chronic health condition, namely, multiple chemical sensitivity, to improve communication among multidisciplinary clinicians. A convenience sample of 100 patients with a diagnosis of multiple chemical sensitivity, nine multidisciplinary clinicians involved in the care of patients with multiple chemical sensitivity, and 36 clinicians in the community participated in the study.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eighty-two percent of the multidisciplinary and inconsistent vocabulary was standardized using the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms (SNOMED(®) CT as a reference terminology. Over 80% of the multidisciplinary clinicians agreed on the overall usefulness of having a controlled vocabulary as a boundary object. Over 65% of clinicians in the community agreed on the overall usefulness of the vocabulary.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results from this study are promising and will be further evaluated in the domain of another complex chronic condition, ie, chronic pain. The study was conducted as a preliminary analysis for developing a boundary object in a heterogeneous domain of knowledge.
authors: Capital District Health Authority.
authors: Tara
authors: T
authors: Sampalli
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Shepherd
authors: Jack
authors: J
authors: Duffy
references: Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Jun;81(6):741-8
references: 16770974
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:833-8
references: 18487835
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):765-9
references: 17911820
references: Fam Pract. 2006 Aug;23(4):414-20
references: 16632487
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:228-32
references: 19745302
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;116:199-204
references: 16160259
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):w1-16
references: 19008253
references: AANA J. 2005 Oct;73(5):361-6
references: 16261852
references: Eur J Cancer. 2006 Oct;42(15):2459-62
references: 16934974
references: Neurologist. 2004 Jan;10(1):18-30
references: 14720312
references: Med J Aust. 2003 Sep 1;179(5):260-2
references: 12924975
references: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2000 Jul;13(3):240-3
references: 16389389
references: JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1242-52
references: 19318652
references: BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1184-7
references: 15142929
references: Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Mar 13;168(11):1116-9
references: 16545215
references: Arch Environ Health. 1999 May-Jun;54(3):147-9
references: 10444033
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):536-46
references: 16799121
references: J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Mar;14(2 Suppl):S3-11
references: 18331114
references: Health Serv Manage Res. 2008 Nov;21(4):228-35
references: 18957400
references: Psychosom Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;65(4):528-33
references: 12883101
references: Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008 May 1;5(4):567-71
references: 18453373
references: Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20
references: 19673146
references: Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):411-7
references: 15506572
references: Int J Med Inform. 2002 Nov 12;65(3):193-211
references: 12414018
references: Rehabil Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):198-206
references: 16175925