title: Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning: towards a global synthesis.
abstract: Encroachment of woody plants into grasslands has generated considerable interest among ecologists. Syntheses of encroachment effects on ecosystem processes have been limited in extent and confined largely to pastoral land uses or particular geographical regions. We used univariate analyses, meta-analysis and structural equation modelling to test the propositions that (1) shrub encroachment does not necessarily lead to declines in ecosystem functions and (2) shrub traits influence the functional outcome of encroachment. Analyses of 43 ecosystem attributes from 244 case studies worldwide showed that some attributes consistently increased with encroachment (e.g. soil C, N), and others declined (e.g. grass cover, pH), but most exhibited variable responses. Traits of shrubs were associated with significant, though weak, structural and functional outcomes of encroachment. Our review revealed that encroachment had mixed effects on ecosystem structure and functioning at global scales, and that shrub traits influence the functional outcome of encroachment. Thus, a simple designation of encroachment as a process leading to functionally, structurally or contextually degraded ecosystems is not supported by a critical analysis of existing literature. Our results highlight that the commonly established link between shrub encroachment and degradation is not universal.
authors: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water c/- Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. d.eldridge@unsw.edu.au
authors: David J
authors: DJ
authors: Eldridge
authors: Matthew A
authors: MA
authors: Bowker
authors: Fernando T
authors: FT
authors: Maestre
authors: Erin
authors: E
authors: Roger
authors: James F
authors: JF
authors: Reynolds
authors: Walter G
authors: WG
authors: Whitford
references: Science. 2007 May 11;316(5826):847-51
references: 17495163
references: Environ Monit Assess. 1995 Jan;37(1-3):231-7
references: 24197851
references: Environ Monit Assess. 1995 Jan;37(1-3):211-30
references: 24197850
references: PLoS One. 2008 Jun 04;3(6):e2332
references: 18523686
references: Ecol Appl. 1991 Feb;1(1):66-84
references: 27755684
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Nov;63(11):4408-12
references: 16535730
references: Science. 1990 Mar 2;247(4946):1043-8
references: 17800060
references: Science. 2001 Jun 22;292(5525):2316-20
references: 11423659
references: Oecologia. 2002 Aug;132(3):402-410
references: 28547418
references: Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):623-6
references: 12167857
references: Ecol Lett. 2009 Sep;12(9):930-41
references: 19638041
references: Ecol Appl. 1992 Feb;2(1):95-101
references: 27759193
references: Nature. 2005 Dec 8;438(7069):846-9
references: 16341012
references: Oecologia. 1989 Mar;80(1):19-26
references: 23494340
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 19;101(42):15130-5
references: 15469919
references: J Environ Manage. 2009 Jul;90(10):2931-42
references: 19501450