title: Assessment of genome integrity with array CGH in cattle transgenic cell lines produced by homologous recombination and somatic cell cloning.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Transgenic cattle carrying multiple genomic modifications have been produced by serial rounds of somatic cell chromatin transfer (cloning) of sequentially genetically targeted somatic cells. However, cloning efficiency tends to decline with the increase of rounds of cloning. It is possible that multiple rounds of cloning compromise the genome integrity or/and introduce epigenetic errors in the resulting cell lines, rendering a decline in cloning. To test these possibilities, we performed 9 high density array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) experiments to test the genome integrity in 3 independent bovine transgenic cell lineages generated from genetic modification and cloning. Our plan included the control hybridizations (self to self) of the 3 founder cell lines and 6 comparative hybridizations between these founders and their derived cell lines with either high or low cloning efficiencies.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We detected similar amounts of differences between the control hybridizations (8, 13 and 39 differences) and the comparative analyses of both "high" and "low" cell lines (ranging from 7 to 57 with a mean of ~20). Almost 75% of the large differences (>10 kb) and about 45% of all differences shared the same type (loss or gain) and were located in nearby genomic regions across hybridizations. Therefore, it is likely that they were not true differences but caused by systematic factors associated with local genomic features (e.g. GC contents).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our findings reveal that large copy number variations are less likely to arise during genetic targeting and serial rounds of cloning, fortifying the notion that epigenetic errors introduced from serial cloning may be responsible for the cloning efficiency decline.
authors: Hematech Inc, Sioux Falls, SD, 57106, USA. yoshi@hematech.com.
authors: George E
authors: GE
authors: Liu
authors: Yali
authors: Y
authors: Hou
authors: James M
authors: JM
authors: Robl
authors: Yoshimi
authors: Y
authors: Kuroiwa
authors: Zhongde
authors: Z
authors: Wang
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Feb;27(2):173-81
references: 19151699
references: BMC Genomics. 2009 Apr 24;10:190
references: 19393066
references: Genome Biol. 2007;8(10):R228
references: 17961237
references: Genome Biol. 2009;10(4):R42
references: 19393038
references: Biostatistics. 2004 Oct;5(4):557-72
references: 15475419
references: Genome Res. 2010 May;20(5):693-703
references: 20212021
references: Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005 Nov;44(3):305-19
references: 16075461
references: Nat Genet. 2004 Jul;36(7):775-80
references: 15184897
references: Anim Reprod Sci. 2010 Apr;118(2-4):388-93
references: 19632072