title: The (paper) work of medicine: understanding international medical costs.
abstract: This paper draws on international evidence on medical spending to examine what the United States can learn about making its healthcare system more efficient. We focus primarily on understanding contemporaneous differences in the level of spending, generally from the 2000s. Medical spending differs across countries either because the price of services differs (for example, a coronary bypass surgery operation may cost more in the United States than in other countries) or because people receive more services in some countries than in others (for example, more bypass surgery operations). Within the price category, there are two further issues: whether factors earn different returns across countries and whether more clinical or administrative personnel are required to deliver the same care in different countries. We first present the results of a decomposition of healthcare spending along these lines in the United States and in Canada. We then delve into each component in more detail—administrative costs, factor prices, and the provision of care received—bringing in a broader range of international evidence when possible. Finally, we touch upon the organization of primary and chronic disease care and discuss possible gains in that area.
authors: Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. dcutler@fas.harvard.edu
authors: David M
authors: DM
authors: Cutler
authors: Dan P
authors: DP
authors: Ly
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1569-77
references: 20820010
references: JAMA. 1990 Oct 17;264(15):1989-94
references: 2120478
references: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):273-87
references: 12585825
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec;28(6):1838-47
references: 19887425
references: J Econ Perspect. 1992 Summer;6(3):3-21
references: 10128078
references: Perm J. 2008 Summer;12(3):25-34
references: 21331207
references: Open Med. 2007 Apr 14;1(1):e27-36
references: 20101287
references: Inquiry. 2010 Summer;47(2):124-34
references: 20812461
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec;28(6):w1171-83
references: 19884491
references: JAMA. 1999 Feb 3;281(5):432-7
references: 9952203
references: Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 1):996-1002
references: 15968014
references: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):288-98
references: 12585826
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Sep-Oct;20(5):216-20
references: 11558706
references: J Health Econ. 2008 Dec;27(6):1407-17
references: 18760850
references: J Health Econ. 2000 Mar;19(2):259-70
references: 10947579
references: Circulation. 2007 Jan 16;115(2):196-203
references: 17190861
references: N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1810-8
references: 16251537
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-521-36
references: 15506157
references: BMJ. 2007 Feb 3;334(7587):236-7
references: 17272564
references: J Econ Perspect. 2008 Fall;22(4):27-50
references: 19305645
references: N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 20;336(8):551-7
references: 9023093
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug;29(8):1461-8
references: 20679648
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 May-Jun;22(3):89-105
references: 12757275
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Sep-Oct;20(5):11-29
references: 11558696
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1248-54
references: 20430822
references: Inquiry. 2000 Fall;37(3):304-16
references: 11111287
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):w1-16
references: 19008253
references: N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2224-32
references: 14657430
references: N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 21;349(8):768-75
references: 12930930