title: The ethics of pacemaker deactivation in terminally ill patients.
abstract: A core principle of American medical ethics holds that an informed and capacitated patient has the right to have treatments withdrawn or withheld. Nevertheless, many clinicians remain reluctant to honor a request to deactivate a patient's pacemaker. This article describes a case in which a patient was denied her request for pacemaker deactivation. Several reasons for this reluctance are discussed, including historical, practical, and ethical considerations for opposing pacemaker deactivation. Ultimately, however, from an ethical standpoint, pacemaker deactivation is similar to withdrawal of other therapies. Fortunately, a recent expert consensus statement supports a patient's right to have her pacemaker deactivated. Pacemaker deactivation should only be performed after robust informed consent, which must include discussion of risks, benefits, and all viable alternatives based on the patient's values and goals.
authors.affiliation: Central Texas Palliative Care Associates, Hospice Austin, Austin, Texas 78759, USA. mbevins@hospiceaustin.org
authors.forename: Michael B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Bevins
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006333:Heart Failure / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial / Q000941:ethics*; D010166:Palliative Care; D013727:Terminal Care; D019452:Terminally Ill; D016312:Treatment Refusal / Q000941:ethics*; D014481:United States; D028761:Withholding Treatment / Q000941:ethics*