title: Comparison of dental measurement systems for taxonomic assignment of Neanderthal and modern human lower second deciduous molars.
abstract: Traditional morphometric approaches for taxonomic assignment of Neanderthal and modern human dental remains are mainly characterized by caliper measurements of tooth crowns. Several studies have recently described differences in dental tissue proportions and enamel thickness between Neanderthal and modern human teeth. At least for the lower second deciduous molar (dm(2)), a three-dimensional lateral relative enamel thickness index has been proposed for separating the two taxa. This index has the advantage over other measurements of being applicable to worn teeth because it ignores the occlusal aspect of the crown. Nevertheless, a comparative evaluation of traditional crown dimensions and lateral dental tissue proportion measurements for taxonomic assignment of Neanderthal and modern human dm(2)s has not yet been performed. In this study, we compare various parameters gathered from the lateral aspects of the crown. These parameters include crown diameters, height of the lateral wall of the crown (lateral crown height = LCH), lateral enamel thickness, and dentine volume of the lateral wall, including the volume of the coronal pulp chamber (lateral dentine plus pulp volume = LDPV), in a 3D digital sample of Neanderthal and modern human dm(2)s to evaluate their utility in separating the two taxa. The LDPV and the LCH allow us to discriminate between Neanderthals and modern humans with 88.5% and 92.3% accuracy, respectively. Though our results confirm that Neanderthal dm(2)s have lower relative enamel thickness (RET) index compared with modern humans (p = 0.005), only 70% of the specimens were correctly classified on the basis of the RET index. We also emphasize that results of the lateral enamel thickness method depend on the magnitude of the interproximal wear. Accordingly, we suggest using the LCH or the LDPV to discriminate between Neanderthal and modern human dm(2)s. These parameters are more independent of interproximal wear and loss of lateral enamel.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria. stefano.benazzi@univie.ac.at
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Benazzi
authors.forename: Cinzia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Fornai
authors.forename: Priscilla
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bayle
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Coquerelle
authors.forename: Ottmar
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Kullmer
authors.forename: Francesco
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Mallegni
authors.forename: Gerhard W
authors.initials: GW
authors.lastname: Weber
mesh_terms: D005060:Europe; D005580:Fossils; D006801:Humans; D008963:Molar / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D059125:Neanderthals / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000145:classification; D009811:Odontometry / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods*; D010161:Paleodontology / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods*; D019228:Tooth Crown / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D014094:Tooth, Deciduous / Q000033:anatomy & histology*