title: Bigrams and the richness of the stimulus.
abstract: Recent challenges to Chomsky's poverty of the stimulus thesis for language acquisition suggest that children's primary data may carry "indirect evidence" about linguistic constructions despite containing no instances of them. Indirect evidence is claimed to suffice for grammar acquisition, without need for innate knowledge. This article reports experiments based on those of Reali and Christiansen (2005), who demonstrated that a simple bigram language model can induce the correct form of auxiliary inversion in certain complex questions. This article investigates the nature of the indirect evidence that supports this learning, and assesses how reliably it is available. Results confirm the original finding for one specific sentence type but show that the model's success is highly circumscribed. It performs poorly on inversion in related constructions in English and Dutch. Because other, more powerful statistical models have so far been shown to succeed only on the same limited subset of cases as the bigram model, it remains to be seen whether stimulus richness can be substantiated more generally.
authors.affiliation: PhD Program in Linguistics, The Graduate Center, City University of New YorkDepartment of Computer Science, Hunter College, The Graduate Center, City University of New YorkPhD Program in Computer Science and Linguistics, The Graduate Center, City University of New York.
authors.forename: Xuân-Nga Cao
authors.initials: XN
authors.lastname: Kam
authors.forename: Iglika
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Stoyneshka
authors.forename: Lidiya
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Tornyova
authors.forename: Janet D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Fodor
authors.forename: William G
authors.initials: WG
authors.lastname: Sakas