title: Effect of breeding strategy and feeding system on the within-herd variation of lean meat percents in Danish slaughter pigs.
abstract: In several countries slaughter pigs are paid for individually, according to slaughter weight and lean meat percent (LMP). Production of uniform batches of pigs within the optimal weight and LMP limits will obtain the best price. Therefore, all pigs should have a similar growth rate (average daily gain, ADG) and reach an appropriate slaughter weight within the same time period. LMP may serve as a proxy for ADG since pigs with low LMP have significantly higher ADG than pigs with high LMP and vice versa. Both breeding strategy and feeding system may influence the range of variation among pigs. The aim of this study was to test the two following hypotheses: (1) Herds purchasing breeding gilts have a higher mean value and a lower variation (standard deviation) in LMP than herds producing their own breeding gilts and (2) Herds using restricted feeding of finishers have a higher mean value and a lower variation (standard deviation) in LMP than herds with ad libitum feeding of finishers. The study included 72 herds and a total of 345,132 pigs slaughtered during one year. Among the 72 herds, 40 were home-breeders and 32 purchased breeding gilts from a breeding company. Nineteen herds used restricted feeding, of which 8 (42%) were home-breeders. Fifty-three herds used ad libitum feeding, of which 32 (60%) were home-breeders. Breeding strategy had a significant effect on SDLMP (p=0.003), where purchase of breeding gilts resulted in a significantly lower standard deviation of the monthly LMP compared to home-bred gilts (a difference in median SDLMP of 0.2 percentage points or 8% difference between groups). Feeding system had a significant effect on the meanLMP (p<0.001), with a significantly higher meanLMP in herds using restrictive feeding compared to ad libitum feeding (60.7% versus 60.0%). Restrictive feeding also resulted in a significantly lower SDLMP (p<0.001) compared to ad libitum feeding (2.2% versus 2.5% or a 12% difference between groups).
authors.affiliation: Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Life Science, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegaardsvej 2, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. hst@life.ku.dk
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Stege
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bagger
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Nielsen
authors.forename: A K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Ersbøll
mesh_terms: D000003:Abattoirs; D000821:Animal Feed; D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000818:Animals; D001835:Body Weight / Q000502:physiology*; D001947:Breeding; D003718:Denmark; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008460:Meat / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013552:Swine