title: Commentary: Female forensic worker sexual misconduct--who is the captive?
abstract: The risk of sexual misconduct by forensic professionals appears at first glance to be far less than the risk of sexual misconduct by other clinical professionals. Yet, Faulkner and Regehr's article draws our attention to the unique and intriguing situation of females working in forensic settings and the very real risk of their engaging in sexual misconduct with male prisoners. The female workers described are professionals: nurses, prison staff, and security officers. Analogies are made between Gabbard's proposed categories of professionals who commit sexual boundary violations and groups of female forensic workers' sexual misconduct with male prisoners. Faulkner and Regehr detail the characteristics of prisoners and the prison setting and how they relate to detrimental interpersonal behavior by female forensic workers. The role of security officers is discussed along with the need for policy-makers to minimize the risks inherent in working with incarcerated populations. The potential for gender-biased explanations of misconduct among female forensic workers is also considered.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55402, USA. hackett@maureenhackettmd.com
authors.forename: Maureen
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hackett
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D011329:Prisoners; D028743:Professional Misconduct; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics*; D012725:Sexual Behavior