title: Emotional inhibition: a discourse analysis of disclosure.
abstract: Evidence generated within the emotional disclosure paradigm (EDP) suggests that talking or writing about emotional experiences produces health benefits, but recent meta-analyses have questioned its efficacy. Studies within the EDP typically rely upon a unidimensional and relatively unsophisticated notion of emotional inhibition, and tend to use quantitative forms of content analysis to identify associations between percentages of word types and positive or negative health outcomes. In this article, we use a case study to show how a qualitative discourse analysis has the potential to identify more of the complexity linking the disclosure practices and styles that may be associated with emotional inhibition. This may illuminate the apparent lack of evidence for efficacy of the EDP by enabling more comprehensive theorisations of the variations within it.
authors.affiliation: School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of East London, London E16 2RD, UK. d.ellis@uel.ac.uk
authors.forename: Darren
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Ellis
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Cromby
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000342:Affective Symptoms / Q000523:psychology; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D033262:Narration; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011582:Psychological Theory; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D012650:Self Disclosure; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom; D014705:Verbal Behavior; D014956:Writing