title: Objectivity, abstraction, and the individual: the influence of Søren Kierkegaard on Paul Feyerabend.
abstract: This paper explores the influence of Søren Kierkegaard upon Paul Feyerabend by examining their common criticisms of totalising accounts of human nature. Both complained that philosophical and scientific theories of human nature which were methodologically committed to objectivity and abstraction failed to capture the richness of human experience. Kierkegaard and Feyerabend argued that philosophy and the science were threatening to become obstacles to human development by imposing abstract theories of human nature and reality which denied the complexities of both. In both cases, this took the form of asserting an 'existential' criterion for the assessment of philosophical and scientific theories. Kierkegaard also made remarks upon the inappropriateness of applying natural scientific methods to human beings which Feyerabend later expanded and developed in his criticisms of the inability of the 'scientific world-view' to accommodate the values necessary to a flourishing human life. I conclude by noting some differences between Kierkegaard and Feyerabend's positions and by affirming the value of existential criticisms of scientific knowledge.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, Durham University, 50 Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HN, UK. i.j.kidd@durham.ac.uk
authors.forename: Ian James
authors.initials: IJ
authors.lastname: Kidd
mesh_terms: D003718:Denmark; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D040821:Human Characteristics; D006808:Humanism / Q000266:history*; D006801:Humans; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history*; D012586:Science / Q000266:history*