title: Comment on 'the case of Melanie' by Joseph Cambray.
abstract: The discussion comments firstly on the role of synchronicity which seems so natural and significant for Jungians but which Freudians would think no more than interesting coincidences. This gives an idea of how different the two schools' approach to the psyche can be. Some theoretical elaboration is made regarding archetypes and primal phantasies: primal phantasies are much related to sexuality, but sexuality understood as intimately linked to the great mysteries of life. The discussion of the clinical work shows more similarities than differences. This suggests that for both perspectives the clinical is sovereign. As we know, respect and care for the patient's evolution, true concern for the patient and skilful use of technique remain the most important indicators of successful therapeutic work in the different psychotherapeutic approaches.
authors.affiliation: cambrayj@earthlink.net
authors.forename: Eduardo
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Gastelumendi
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007602:Jungian Theory; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy