title: Spatial working memory load affects counting but not subitizing in enumeration.
abstract: The present study investigated whether subitizing reflects capacity limitations associated with two types of working memory tasks. Under a dual-task situation, participants performed an enumeration task in conjunction with either a spatial (Experiment 1) or a nonspatial visual (Experiment 2) working memory task. Experiment 1 showed that spatial working memory load affected the slope of a counting function but did not affect subitizing performance or subitizing range. Experiment 2 showed that nonspatial visual working memory load affected neither enumeration efficiency nor subitizing range. Furthermore, in both spatial and nonspatial memory tasks, neither subitizing efficiency nor subitizing range was affected by amount of imposed memory load. In all the experiments, working memory load failed to influence slope, subitizing range, or overall reaction time. These findings suggest that subitizing is performed without either spatial or nonspatial working memory. A possible mechanism of subitizing with independent capacity of working memory is discussed.
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Japan. to.shimomura@aist.go.jp
authors.forename: Tomonari
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Shimomura
authors.forename: Takatsune
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kumada
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003210:Concept Formation; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time; D055815:Young Adult