title: Framing matters: contextual influences on interracial interaction outcomes.
abstract: Previous studies indicate that interracial interactions frequently have negative outcomes but have typically focused on social contexts. The current studies examined the effect of manipulating interaction context. In Study 1, Black and White participants worked together with instructions that created either a social focus or a task focus. With a task focus, interracial pairs were more consistently synchronized, Black participants showed less executive function depletion, and White participants generally showed reduced implicit bias. Follow-up studies suggested that prejudice concerns help explain these findings: White participants reported fewer concerns about appearing prejudiced when they imagined an interracial interaction with a task focus rather than a social focus (Study 2a), and Black participants reported less vigilance against prejudice in an imagined interracial interaction with a task focus rather than a social focus (Study 2b). Taken together, these studies illustrate the importance of interaction context for the experiences of both Blacks and Whites.
authors.affiliation: Tufts University, Department of Psychology, Medford, MA 02155, USA. Laura.Babbitt@tufts.edu
authors.forename: Laura G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Babbitt
authors.forename: Samuel R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Sommers
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D044383:Black People / Q000523:psychology; D056344:Executive Function; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011287:Prejudice; D011340:Problem Solving; D011822:Race Relations / Q000523:psychology*; D057566:Self Report; D012919:Social Behavior; D057190:Stroop Test; D044465:White People / Q000523:psychology; D055815:Young Adult