title: [Comparison of the depth predictability of intra corneal ring segment implantation by mechanical versus femtosecond laser-assisted techniques using optical coherence tomography (OCT Visante(®))].
abstract: Comparison of the depth predictability of intracorneal ring segment implantation by mechanical versus femtosecond laser-assisted techniques using optical coherence tomography (OCT Visante(®)).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare the depth predictability of intracorneal ring segment implantation by mechanical versus femtosecond laser-assisted techniques using OCT Visante(®).
  
  
  METHODS
  This observational prospective study included, after patients' consent, 76 keratoconic eyes, of which 31 eyes (group 1) were operated using the mechanical technique and 45 eyes (group 2) with the femtosecond laser-assisted technique. The target depth was two-thirds of the peripheral corneal thickness, ranging from 5 to 7 mm in diameter. Every patient underwent high-resolution anterior segment OCT (OCT Visante(®)) measurement preoperatively and for the implant depth, 1 month postoperatively. Then two different sites were used to determine the segment depth, at the segment site and tangentially, at a distance of 700 μm central to the segment's inner edge.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both measurement techniques demonstrated that targeted implantation depth of 66% of the corneal thickness was not observed in either group. The mean difference between the preoperative expected depth and final segment implantation was 76.64 ± 48.76 μm in the manual technique and 85.85 ± 33.02 μm in the femtosecond-assisted technique, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. Comparison between the measurement sites showed implantation depth to be shallower, 54.93±6.03%, at the tangential site compared to 55.14 ± 8.08% at the implant site in group 1 and 56.17 ± 5.82% versus 58.88 ± 6.06%, respectively, in group 2.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both mechanical and femtosecond laser-assisted techniques showed a more superficial Intacs(®) placement than predicted. No statistically significant difference was observed in implantation depth between the two groups.
authors.affiliation: Service d'ophtalmologie, CHU Pellegrin, place Amélie-Rabat-Léon, 33000 Bordeaux, France. xavkouassi@yahoo.fr
authors.forename: F-X
authors.initials: FX
authors.lastname: Kouassi
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Buestel
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Raman
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Melinte
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Touboul
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gallois
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Colin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003315:Cornea / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007640:Keratoconus / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D053685:Laser Therapy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D007834:Lasers; D008297:Male; D019563:Mechanics; D008875:Middle Aged; D009929:Organ Size; D011184:Postoperative Period; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D019919:Prosthesis Implantation / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D013524:Surgical Flaps / Q000502:physiology; D041623:Tomography, Optical Coherence / Q000379:methods*; D055815:Young Adult