title: [Meeting the needs of the European working time directive in german medical profession].
abstract: The legal obligation of the European Working Time Directive with its implementation into a German Working Hours Act requires German hospitals to give up old structures and requires the implementation of new working time models. The failure of the revision of the European Working Time Directive in April 2009 prevented that any changes of status quo might happen in the near future. Fundamental terms of the working law for the medical area have been elucidated and have been implemented into concrete calculation formulas. The planned working time has been clearly determined. Particularly, on-call duties and a signed "OptOut-declaration" have huge effects on the upper limit of the working time that is to be determined. Shift duty leads to the greatest limitations of the upper limit of the working time. The Working Hours Act defines the maximal, available, individual working time budget and thus the working time budget of a hospital and it limits the maximal availability of the service providers of a hospital as well as defining the maximal personnel costs. Transparency in this area lays the foundation for an effective time management and the creation of new working time models in accordance with the European Working Time Directive as well as the Working Hours Act and the "TVÄ" (labour contract for doctors at municipal hospitals). It is possible, with the knowledge of the maximal working time budget and the thereof resulting personnel costs, to calculate the economical revenues better. The reallocation of the working time of doctors enables efficiency enhancement. It is necessary to demand a clear definition of the tasks of doctors with the consequential discharge of tasks that should not/do not belong to the responsibilities of a doctor. This would lead to a more attractive working environment for doctors at hospitals and thus to an improvement of the care of the patients. The implementation of the European Time Directive is not to be seen as unrealizable, as has been generally heard; instead, it enables the urgently necessary structural reform at German hospitals.
authors.affiliation: Klinik und Poliklinik für Thorax-, Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen. m.friedrich@med.uni-goettingen.de
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Friedrich
authors.forename: A F
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Popov
authors.forename: J D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Schmitto
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bireta
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Emmert
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Tirilomis
mesh_terms: D003284:Contract Services / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005060:Europe; D005062:European Union; D005858:Germany; D006284:Health Plan Implementation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006773:Hospitals, Municipal / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010561:Personnel Staffing and Scheduling / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014940:Work Schedule Tolerance