title: Developing community partner training: regulations and relationships.
abstract: While funders increasingly support research that partners with communities, community partners still must submit to a regulatory oversight structure that does not reflect their unique research ethics challenges and needs. In recognition of the importance of collaborative research endeavors, the authors engaged in a process of reconnaissance and negotiations with local community partners and research ethics boards (REBs) at the University of Michigan to begin to address the mismatch between regulatory demands and community-based research realities. This preliminary process yielded both changes in the REB oversight structure and training required of community partnered research. While the ultimate impact of these changes remains to be seen, the process itself yielded insights and materials of use to both our local REBs, and hopefully those at other institutions as well. This article will present those insights and provide links to those materials.
authors.affiliation: Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO 63104-1314, USA. stesolom@gmail.com
authors.forename: Stephanie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Solomon
authors.forename: Patricia J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Piechowski
mesh_terms: D055812:Community-Based Participatory Research / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research; D032984:Ethics, Research / Q000193:education*; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D008824:Michigan; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D014481:United States; D014495:Universities