title: Ecological assembly rules in plant communities--approaches, patterns and prospects.
abstract: Understanding how communities of living organisms assemble has been a central question in ecology since the early days of the discipline. Disentangling the different processes involved in community assembly is not only interesting in itself but also crucial for an understanding of how communities will behave under future environmental scenarios. The traditional concept of assembly rules reflects the notion that species do not co-occur randomly but are restricted in their co-occurrence by interspecific competition. This concept can be redefined in a more general framework where the co-occurrence of species is a product of chance, historical patterns of speciation and migration, dispersal, abiotic environmental factors, and biotic interactions, with none of these processes being mutually exclusive. Here we present a survey and meta-analyses of 59 papers that compare observed patterns in plant communities with null models simulating random patterns of species assembly. According to the type of data under study and the different methods that are applied to detect community assembly, we distinguish four main types of approach in the published literature: species co-occurrence, niche limitation, guild proportionality and limiting similarity. Results from our meta-analyses suggest that non-random co-occurrence of plant species is not a widespread phenomenon. However, whether this finding reflects the individualistic nature of plant communities or is caused by methodological shortcomings associated with the studies considered cannot be discerned from the available metadata. We advocate that more thorough surveys be conducted using a set of standardized methods to test for the existence of assembly rules in data sets spanning larger biological and geographical scales than have been considered until now. We underpin this general advice with guidelines that should be considered in future assembly rules research. This will enable us to draw more accurate and general conclusions about the non-random aspect of assembly in plant communities.
authors.affiliation: Department of Botany, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. lars@ut.ee
authors.forename: Lars
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Götzenberger
authors.forename: Francesco
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: de Bello
authors.forename: Kari Anne
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Bråthen
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Davison
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dubuis
authors.forename: Antoine
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Guisan
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lepš
authors.forename: Regina
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lindborg
authors.forename: Mari
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Moora
authors.forename: Meelis
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pärtel
authors.forename: Loic
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pellissier
authors.forename: Julien
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pottier
authors.forename: Pascal
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Vittoz
authors.forename: Kristjan
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Zobel
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Zobel
mesh_terms: D017753:Ecosystem; D008954:Models, Biological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D010944:Plants / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics; D013045:Species Specificity