title: Toxicity testing in the 21 century: defining new risk assessment approaches based on perturbation of intracellular toxicity pathways.
abstract: The approaches to quantitatively assessing the health risks of chemical exposure have not changed appreciably in the past 50 to 80 years, the focus remaining on high-dose studies that measure adverse outcomes in homogeneous animal populations. This expensive, low-throughput approach relies on conservative extrapolations to relate animal studies to much lower-dose human exposures and is of questionable relevance to predicting risks to humans at their typical low exposures. It makes little use of a mechanistic understanding of the mode of action by which chemicals perturb biological processes in human cells and tissues. An alternative vision, proposed by the U.S. National Research Council (NRC) report Toxicity Testing in the 21(st) Century: A Vision and a Strategy, called for moving away from traditional high-dose animal studies to an approach based on perturbation of cellular responses using well-designed in vitro assays. Central to this vision are (a) "toxicity pathways" (the innate cellular pathways that may be perturbed by chemicals) and (b) the determination of chemical concentration ranges where those perturbations are likely to be excessive, thereby leading to adverse health effects if present for a prolonged duration in an intact organism. In this paper we briefly review the original NRC report and responses to that report over the past 3 years, and discuss how the change in testing might be achieved in the U.S. and in the European Union (EU). EU initiatives in developing alternatives to animal testing of cosmetic ingredients have run very much in parallel with the NRC report. Moving from current practice to the NRC vision would require using prototype toxicity pathways to develop case studies showing the new vision in action. In this vein, we also discuss how the proposed strategy for toxicity testing might be applied to the toxicity pathways associated with DNA damage and repair.
authors.affiliation: Program in Chemical Safety Sciences, The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
authors.forename: Sudin
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Bhattacharya
authors.forename: Qiang
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Paul L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Carmichael
authors.forename: Kim
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Boekelheide
authors.forename: Melvin E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Andersen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005062:European Union; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D018570:Risk Assessment; D015398:Signal Transduction; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends