title: Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purposes of this study were to investigate the frequency and clinical relevance of the incidental finding of renal masses at low-dose unenhanced CT and to analyze the results for features that can be used to guide evaluation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Images from unenhanced CT colonographic examinations of 3001 consecutively registered adults without symptoms (1667 women, 1334 men; mean age, 57 years) were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of cystic and solid renal masses 1 cm in diameter or larger. An index mass, that is, the most complex or concerning, in each patient was assessed for size, mean attenuation, and morphologic features. Masses containing fat or with attenuation less than 20 HU or greater than 70 HU were considered benign if they did not contain thickened walls or septations, three or more septations, mural nodules, or thick calcifications. Masses with attenuation between 20 and 70 HU or any of these features were considered indeterminate. The performance of CT colonography in the detection of renal cell carcinoma was calculated for masses with 2 or more years of follow-up.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At least one renal mass was identified in 433 (14.4%) patients. The mean size of the index masses was 25 ± 16 mm; 376 (86.8%) masses were classified as benign and 57 (13.2%) as indeterminate. The 20- to 70-HU attenuation criterion alone was used for classification of 53 indeterminate lesions. Follow-up data (mean follow-up period, 4.4 years; range, 2-6.3 years) were available for 353 (81.5%) patients with masses (41 indeterminate, 312 benign). Four of the 41 indeterminate masses were diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma. The sensitivity and specificity for renal cell carcinoma on the basis of the indeterminate criteria were 100% and 89.4%. The positive and negative predictive values were 9.8% and 100%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The incidental finding of a renal mass is relatively common at unenhanced CT, but imaging criteria can be used for reliable identification of most of these lesions as benign without further workup. Mean attenuation alone appears reliable for determining which renal masses need further evaluation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, 53792-3252, USA.
authors.forename: Stacy D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: O'Connor
authors.forename: Perry J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Pickhardt
authors.forename: David H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: M Raquel
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Oliva
authors.forename: Stuart G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Silverman
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033162:Incidental Findings; D007680:Kidney Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015995:Prevalence; D011379:Prognosis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014922:Wisconsin / Q000453:epidemiology