title: Utilization of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States before and after the clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the utilization of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) in the United States before and after prospective data supported its use for the treatment of colon cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2001-2003 [before Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST)] and 2005-2007 (after COST) was queried for elective colectomies for both benign and malignant disease. The COST trial was published in 2004; therefore, 2004 data were excluded. Univariate analyses including patient-specific, hospital-specific, and outcome variables were performed. Multivariate logistic regression models and subset analyses were used to evaluate these variables and operative approach by time frame.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The query yielded 741,817 elective colectomies (684,969 open and 56,848 laparoscopic). The percentage of elective colectomies performed laparoscopically has increased over time. Laparoscopic colectomy for benign disease increased from 6.2% in 2001-2003 to 11.8% in 2005-2007, while those for colon cancer have increased by a larger percentage, 2.3% to 8.9%. In a multivariate model of patients with colon cancer, the odds ratio (OR) for having a laparoscopic approach after COST was 4.55 (confidence interval 3.81-5.44) compared with before COST. In contrast, for benign disease, the OR was 2.10 (confidence interval 1.79-2.46). Factors predictive of having a laparoscopic approach for cancer have changed very little over time: Patients are more likely to be male, insured, live in areas with the highest incomes, and undergo resection at urban teaching hospitals.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Within 3 years after publication of the COST trial, the use of laparoscopic resection for colon cancer approached that of benign disease. However, almost 90% of cases are still performed open and utilization remains influenced by socioeconomic factors.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
authors.forename: Jennifer D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Rea
authors.forename: Molly M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Cone
authors.forename: Brian S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Diggs
authors.forename: Karen E
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Deveney
authors.forename: Kim C
authors.initials: KC
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.forename: Daniel O
authors.initials: DO
authors.lastname: Herzig
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003082:Colectomy / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003110:Colonic Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000191:economics; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D017048:Health Care Costs / Q000639:trends; D017722:Hospital Charges / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000191:economics; D008297:Male; D008432:Mathematical Computing; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States; D014600:Utilization Review / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D055815:Young Adult