title: Gastric band erosion in 63 cases: endoscopic removal and rebanding evaluated.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) remains the most popular bariatric procedure performed in Australia and Europe. Gastric band erosion is a significant complication that results in band removal. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of band erosion and its subsequent management with a particular focus on rebanding results.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients who underwent LAGB in a prospective cohort study from August 1996 to October 2010 were evaluated. Patients that developed band erosion were identified and clinical presentations, band characteristics and subsequent management were evaluated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One thousand eight hundred seventy-four morbidly obese patients underwent LAGB. Band erosion developed in 63 patients (3.4%). Median preoperative BMI was 41.5 kg/m(2) (range 30-61 kg/m(2)). Median time from operation to diagnosis was 39 months (range 6-132 months). Twenty nine patients (46%) were asymptomatic (sudden loss of restriction, weight gain, turbid fluid, or absence of fluid). Symptoms included abdominal pain in 24 (38%), obstruction in 7 (11%), recurrent port infection in 5 (8%), reflux symptoms in 2 (3%) and sepsis in 2 (3%). Fourteen patients (22%) had discolouration of the fluid in their band. Endoscopic removal was attempted in 50 patients with successful removal in 46 (92%). Median number of endoscopies prior to removal was 1.0 (range 1-5). The median duration of the procedure was 46 min (range 17-118 min). Rebanding was performed in 29 patients and 5 (17%) experienced a second erosion. Mean percentage excess weight loss was 54% in the remaining 22 patients with at least 3 months follow-up.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Band erosion prevalence was 3.4%. Endoscopic removal of eroded gastric bands was proven safe and effective. Band erosion is now preferably managed endoscopically in our institution. Rebanding following erosion results in acceptable weight loss but an unacceptable reerosion rate.
authors.affiliation: Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Circle of Care, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia. jacob.chisholm@health.sa.gov.au
authors.forename: Jacob
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chisholm
authors.forename: Normayah
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kitan
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Toouli
authors.forename: Lilian
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Kow
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D020878:Device Removal / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D015391:Gastroplasty / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009767:Obesity, Morbid / Q000601:surgery*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012086:Reoperation; D055815:Young Adult