title: Acceptance of shared decision making with reference to an electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) and its association to decision making in patients: an evaluation study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Decision aids based on the philosophy of shared decision making are designed to help patients make informed choices among diagnostic or treatment options by delivering evidence-based information on options and outcomes. A patient decision aid can be regarded as a complex intervention because it consists of several presumably relevant components. Decision aids have rarely been field tested to assess patients' and physicians' attitudes towards them. It is also unclear what effect decision aids have on the adherence to chosen options.
  
  
  METHODS
  The electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) to be used within the clinical encounter has a modular structure and contains evidence-based decision aids for the following topics: cardiovascular prevention, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, oral antidiabetics, conventional and intensified insulin therapy, and unipolar depression. We conducted an evaluation study in which 29 primary care physicians included 192 patients. After the consultation, patients filled in questionnaires and were interviewed via telephone two months later. We used generalised estimation equations to measure associations within patient variables and traditional crosstab analyses.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Patients were highly satisfied with arriba-lib and the process of shared decision making. Two-thirds of patients reached in the telephone interview wanted to be counselled again with arriba-lib. There was a high congruence between preferred and perceived decision making. Of those patients reached in the telephone interview, 80.7% said that they implemented the decision, independent of gender and education. Elderly patients were more likely to say that they implemented the decision.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Shared decision making with our multi-modular electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) was accepted by a high number of patients. It has positive associations to general aspects of decision making in patients. It can be used for patient groups with a wide range of individual characteristics.
authors: Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. oliver.hirsch@staff.uni-marburg.de
authors: Oliver
authors: O
authors: Hirsch
authors: Heidemarie
authors: H
authors: Keller
authors: Tanja
authors: T
authors: Krones
authors: Norbert
authors: N
authors: Donner-Banzhoff
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003657:Decision Making; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D046609:Libraries, Digital; D007993:Libraries, Medical; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000523:psychology*; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D058007:Physicians, Primary Care / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014584:User-Computer Interface