title: The role of observer strategy in the single-target AB paradigm.
abstract: Identification of the second of two targets (T1, T2) inserted in a stream of distractors is impaired when presented 200-500 ms after the first (attentional blink, AB). An AB-like effect has been reported by Nieuwenstein, Potter, and Theeuwes, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 159-169, (2009, Experiment 2), with a distractor stream that contained only one target and a gap just before the target. Nieuwenstein et al. hypothesized that the gap enhanced the salience of the last distractor, causing it to be processed much like T1 in conventional AB studies. This hypothesis can also account for Lag-1 sparing (enhanced target performance when presented directly after the last distractor, without an intervening gap). We propose an alternative account of the Lag-1 sparing in the single-target paradigm based on observer strategy, and test it by presenting the single-target and dual-target conditions to separate groups (Experiment 2) instead of mixed across trials (Experiment 1 and Nieuwenstein et al.'s study). The single-target condition exhibited Lag-1 sparing when it was mixed with the dual-target condition, but Lag-1 deficit when it was done in isolation. This outcome is consistent with an observer-strategy account but not with an enhanced salience account of the Lag-1 sparing effect in the single-target condition.
authors: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
authors: Hayley E P
authors: HE
authors: Lagroix
authors: Thomas M
authors: TM
authors: Spalek
authors: Vincent
authors: V
authors: Di Lollo
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D054518:Attentional Blink; D056344:Executive Function; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance