title: Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Given the increasing demand for tissue-sparing surgery, the surgical approach is the subject of lively debate in total hip replacement. The aim of this paper is to compare the efficacy of the minimally invasive direct anterior approach and the standard lateral approach to total hip replacement surgery by observing intra- and perioperative outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  The authors conducted a retrospective study on a group of 419 consecutive patients undergoing total hip replacement for coxarthrosis. The patients were divided into a first group (A) of 198 patients who had surgery with the standard lateral approach, and a second control group (B) of 221 patients who had the same procedure via the minimally invasive direct anterior approach. Assessment of the two groups considered the following perioperative parameters: length of the surgical procedure, intraoperative complications, intra- and postoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of stay, and type of discharge.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The two groups were homogeneous when compared in relation to mean age, sex and body weight. The minimally invasive direct anterior approach was performed within an acceptable time (89 ± 19 min vs. 81 ± 15 min) and with modest blood loss (3.1 ± 0.9 g/dL vs. 3,5 ± 1 g/dL). Patients experienced less pain (1.4 ± 1.5 NRS score vs. 2.5 ± 2 NRS score), and PONV affected only 5% versus 10% of cases. Times to discharge were shorter (7 ± 2 days vs. 10 ± 3.5 days), and 58.4% versus 11.6% of patients were discharged to home.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In our study, patients treated with a minimally invasive direct anterior approach had a better perioperative outcome than patients treated with the lateral approach. The longer time of surgery for the minimally invasive direct anterior approach may be attributed to the learning curve. Further studies are necessary to investigate the advantages of a minimally invasive direct anterior approach in terms of clinical results in the short and long run.
authors: Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Polo Hospital, via Galvani, 1, 34074 Monfalcone, GO, Italy.
authors: Vincenzo
authors: V
authors: Alecci
authors: Maurizio
authors: M
authors: Valente
authors: Marina
authors: M
authors: Crucil
authors: Matteo
authors: M
authors: Minerva
authors: Chiara-Martina
authors: CM
authors: Pellegrino
authors: Dario Davide
authors: DD
authors: Sabbadini
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007431:Intraoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control*; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D010027:Osteotomy / Q000379:methods* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D010351:Patient Discharge; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012189:Retrospective Studies