title: How 'do's' and 'dont's' can be of significant importance in radiation protection: a case report.
abstract: The Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA) was contacted by a cardiology department because of a suspicious radiation burn on a patient. The patient had undergone two bi-ventricular pacemaker implantations and the lesion was recognised as radiation dermatitis. The NRPA sent sets of thermoluminescense dosemeters to the department to measure the skin dose on eight successive patients undergoing bi-ventricular pacemaker implantations. The average maximum entrance surface dose for the eight patients was 5.3 Gy, ranging from 2.0 to 13.1 Gy. A site audit was performed during a procedure, with the aim to observe the general skills in radiation protection. Based on the findings in the audit, a few very simple 'Do's' and 'Don'ts' were highlighted in a meeting directly after the audit. After the audit, dose measurements were performed on six new patients showing an average maximum entrance surface dose of 0.4 Gy, ranging from 0.2 to 0.8 Gy. The aim of this work was to illustrate the dose reductions that are possible to achieve with a very few basic advices, especially when the operator has suboptimal competence.
authors: Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Section for Dosimetry and Medical Applications, PO Box 55, NO-1332 Oesteraas, Norway. anders.widmark@nrpa.no
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Widmark
authors: E G
authors: EG
authors: Friberg
mesh_terms: D002056:Burns / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D005471:Fluoroscopy; D006801:Humans; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011835:Radiation Protection; D011855:Radiodermatitis / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012867:Skin / Q000293:injuries / Q000528:radiation effects; D013819:Thermoluminescent Dosimetry