title: Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall.
abstract: When people recall together in a collaborative group they recall less than their potential. This phenomenon of collaborative inhibition is explained in terms of retrieval disruption. However, collaborative recall also re-exposes individuals to items recalled by others that they themselves might otherwise have forgotten. This re-exposure produces post-collaborative benefits in individual recall. The current study examined whether reduced retrieval disruption during group recall is related not only to less collaborative inhibition, but also to greater post-collaborative recall benefits. To test this we devised a paradigm to calculate the extent to which each individual experienced retrieval disruption during group recall. We also included two types of collaborative groups, one of which was expected to experience greater retrieval disruption than the other. Results suggest that the relationship between retrieval disruption and recall performance depends on the level at which retrieval disruption is measured. When retrieval disruption was assessed at the individual level, then minimising retrieval disruption was associated with higher recall (i.e., less collaborative inhibition and greater post-collaborative individual recall). However, when retrieval disruption was assessed at the group level there was no relationship with recall. Furthermore, the findings from this design suggest a role of cross-cueing in modulating group recall levels.
authors: Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
authors: Sarah J
authors: SJ
authors: Barber
authors: Suparna
authors: S
authors: Rajaram
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D011939:Mental Recall; D011597:Psychomotor Performance