title: Day care versus in-patient surgery for age-related cataract.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Age-related cataract accounts for more than 40% of cases of blindness in the world with the majority of people who are blind from cataract found in the developing world. With the increased number of people with cataract there is an urgent need for cataract surgery to be made available as a day care procedure.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To provide reliable evidence for the safety, feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cataract extraction performed as day care versus in-patient procedure.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 5), MEDLINE (January 1950 to May 2011), EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2011), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to May 2011), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com) and ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 23 May 2011.
  
  
  METHODS
  We included randomised controlled trials comparing day care and in-patient surgery for age-related cataract. The primary outcome was the achievement of a satisfactory visual acuity six weeks after the operation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We included two trials (conducted in Spain and USA), involving 1284 people. One trial reported statistically significant differences in early postoperative complication rates in the day care group, with an increased risk of increased intraocular pressure, which had no clinical relevance to visual outcomes four months postoperatively. The mean change in visual acuity (Snellen lines) of the operated eye four months postoperatively was 4.1 (standard deviation (SD) 2.3) for the day care group and 4.1 (SD 2.2) for the in-patient group and not statistically significant. The four-month postoperative mean change in quality of life score measured using the VF14 showed minimal differences between the two groups. Costs were 20% more for the in-patient group and this was attributed to higher costs for overnight stay. One study only reported hotel costs for the non-hospitalised participants making aggregation of data on costs impossible.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This review provides some evidence that there is a cost saving but no significant difference in outcome or risk of postoperative complications between day care and in-patient cataract surgery. This is based on one detailed and methodologically sound trial conducted in the developed world. The success, safety and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery as a day care procedure appear to be acceptable. Future research may well focus on evidence provided by high quality clinical databases and registers which would enable clinicians and healthcare planners to agree clinical and social indications for in-patient care and so make better use of resources, by selecting day case surgery unless these criteria are met.
authors: UKCC (Bahrain Branch), Ministry of Health, Bahrain, Box 25438, Awali, Bahrain.
authors: Zbys
authors: Z
authors: Fedorowicz
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Lawrence
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Gutierrez
authors: Esther J
authors: EJ
authors: van Zuuren
mesh_terms: D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures / Q000191:economics; D002387:Cataract Extraction / Q000191:economics; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D006760:Hospitalization / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic