title: What does not work? Expert consensus on discredited treatments in the addictions.
abstract: Evidence-based practice promotes those research-supported treatments that have proven effective, but it rarely identifies discredited treatments that are to be avoided. We sought to establish a professional consensus on discredited addiction treatments using Delphi methodology. A panel of 75 experts participated in a 2-stage study, reporting familiarity with 65 treatments and rating these on a continuum from "not at all discredited" to "certainly discredited." We report their composite opinions and significant differences that occurred as a function of the panelists' theoretical orientation. The results require careful interpretation, but do offer a cogent first step in identifying a professional consensus of discredited treatments for addictions.
authors.affiliation: From the Department of Psychology, University of Scranton (JCN, NCF), Scranton, PA; Dean's Office, Simmons College (GPK), Boston, MA; and National Development and Research Institutes (HKW), New York, NY.
authors.forename: John C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Norcross
authors.forename: Gerald P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Koocher
authors.forename: Natalie C
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Fala
authors.forename: Harry K
authors.initials: HK
authors.lastname: Wexler