title: Discussion: 'Tumor diameter as a predictor in endometrial cancer surgery' by Yanazume et al.
abstract: In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed: Yanazume S, Saito T, Eto T, et al. Reassessment of the utility of frozen sections in endometrial cancer surgery using tumor diameter as an additional factor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:531.e1-7.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
authors.forename: Linda
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Van Le
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Ko
authors.forename: Paola
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Gehrig
authors.forename: Megan
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: DiFurio
authors.forename: Vicki
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Bae-Jump
authors.forename: Emma
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Rossi
mesh_terms: D016889:Endometrial Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests