title: Biobanks and the phantom public.
abstract: This paper surveys the current state of knowledge about the relationship between different national publics and biobanks, how different publics perceive biobanks, and which issues are identified as important by various stakeholders. We discuss existing studies and emerging governance strategies dealing with the biobank-publics interface and argue that the search for phantom (biobank) public(s) is on, but still much needs to be done. We argue that the existing data originate in a relatively few regions, among them Northern Europe, the United Kingdom, and in certain U.S. states and are often based on survey research with small samples and short questionnaires. Combined usage of qualitative and quantitative methodology in studies is still rare though of great importance in order to investigate distributions of public opinion and also to be able to explain these patterns. Many important questions in the relationship between publics and biobanks are unexplored, or the existing data are inconsistent.
authors.affiliation: University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. herbert.gottweis@univie.ac.at
authors.forename: Herbert
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Gottweis
authors.forename: Haidan
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Johannes
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Starkbaum
mesh_terms: D018070:Biological Specimen Banks; D002681:China; D003159:Community-Institutional Relations; D005060:Europe; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007055:Iceland; D011639:Public Opinion; D012935:Social Justice; D006113:United Kingdom