title: The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making.
abstract: In the current study, we report on an experiment examining whether functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) lie detection evidence would influence potential jurors' assessment of guilt in a criminal trial. Potential jurors (N = 330) read a vignette summarizing a trial, with some versions of the vignette including lie detection evidence indicating that the defendant was lying about having committed the crime. Lie detector evidence was based on evidence from the polygraph, fMRI (functional brain imaging), or thermal facial imaging. Results showed that fMRI lie detection evidence led to more guilty verdicts than lie detection evidence based on polygraph evidence, thermal facial imaging, or a control condition that did not include lie detection evidence. However, when the validity of the fMRI lie detection evidence was called into question on cross-examination, guilty verdicts were reduced to the level of the control condition. These results provide important information about the influence of lie detection evidence in legal settings.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, USA.
authors.forename: David P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: McCabe
authors.forename: Alan D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Castel
authors.forename: Matthew G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Rhodes
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D003416:Criminal Law / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D008014:Lie Detection; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D059906:Neuroimaging; D055815:Young Adult