title: Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.
abstract: Conditioned reinforcer effects may be due to the stimulus' discriminative rather than its strengthening properties. While this was demonstrated in a frequently-changing choice procedure, a single attempt to replicate in a relatively static choice environment failed. We contend that this was because the information provided by the stimuli was nonredundant in the frequently-changing preparation, and redundant in the steady-state arrangement. In the present experiments, 6 pigeons worked in a steady-state concurrent schedule procedure with nonredundant informative stimuli (red keylight illuminations). When a response-contingent red keylight signaled that the next food delivery was more likely on one of the two alternatives, postkeylight choice responding was reliably for that alternative. This effect was enhanced after a history of extended informative red keylight presentation (Experiment 2). These results lend support to recent characterizations of conditioned reinforcer effects as reflective of a discriminative, rather than a reinforcing, property of the stimulus.
authors.affiliation: The University of Auckland. ntboutros@ucsd.edu
authors.forename: Nathalie
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Boutros
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Davison
authors.forename: Douglas
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Elliffe
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002755:Choice Behavior; D010856:Columbidae; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D003463:Cues; D005502:Food; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011930:Reaction Time; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology