title: Strategies for capacity building for health research in Bangladesh: Role of core funding and a common monitoring and evaluation framework.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is increasing interest in building the capacity of researchers in low and middle income countries (LMIC) to address their national priority health and health policy problems. However, the number and variety of partnerships and funding arrangements can create management problems for LMIC research institutes. This paper aims to identify problems faced by a health research institute in Bangladesh, describe two strategies developed to address these problems, and identify the results after three years of implementation.
  
  
  METHODS
  This paper uses a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data collected during independent annual reviews of the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B) between 2006 and 2010. Quantitative data includes the number of research activities according to strategic priority areas, revenues collected and expenditure. Qualitative data includes interviews of researchers and management of ICDDR,B, and of research users and key donors. Data in a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (MEF) were assessed against agreed indicators.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The key problems faced by ICDDR,B in 2006 were insufficient core funds to build research capacity and supporting infrastructure, and an inability to direct research funds towards the identified research priorities in its strategic plan. Two strategies were developed to address these problems: a group of donors agreed to provide unearmarked pooled core funding, and accept a single common report based on an agreed MEF. On review after three years, there had been significant increases in total revenue, and the ability to allocate greater amounts of money on capacity building and infrastructure. The MEF demonstrated progress against strategic objectives, and better alignment of research against strategic priorities. There had also been changes in the sense of ownership and collaboration between ICDDR,B's management and its core donors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The changes made to funding relationships supported and monitored by an effective MEF enabled the organisation to better align funding with research priorities and to invest in capacity building. This paper identified key issues for capacity building for health research in low and middle income countries. The findings have relevance to other research institutes in similar contexts to advocate and support research capacity strengthening efforts.
authors.affiliation: Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 161 Barry Street, Carlton, Victoria 3010, Australia. shakila@unimelb.edu.au.
authors.forename: Shakeel
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Mahmood
authors.forename: Krishna
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hort
authors.forename: Shakil
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ahmed
authors.forename: Mohammed
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Salam
authors.forename: Alejandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cravioto