title: Teleradiology: friend or foe? What imaging's now indispensable partner means for radiology's future and for the quality of care.
abstract: Over the past half decade, teleradiology companies have served as invaluable business partners to local radiology providers grappling with declining reimbursements, shrinking budgets, and an imaging utilization explosion that has rendered workloads unmanageable. The teleradiology business model has helped to stabilize local imaging groups through economies of scale to control costs, by facilitating rapid workflow and report turnaround times, and offering a broad range of subspecialty expertise. Teleradiology has landed radiology at an important crossroads and market forces are actively shaping its future. This article examines the role of technological innovation in teleradiology's success, and suggests that persistent technological and operational limitations raise important questions regarding quality of care. This article also joins the imaging industry's discussion as to whether radiology can be (or has been) commoditized, and explores the feasibility of the commoditization of imaging and its impact on traditional radiology practice. There appears to be an important role for teleradiology in the provision of radiology services going forward, and yet boundaries must be thoughtfully drawn in order to achieve best practices for the specialty's future. tion, commoditization.
authors.affiliation: Loyola University Chicago, USA. hawk.pollybeth@gmail.com
authors.forename: PollyBeth
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Hawk
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008507:Medically Underserved Area; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D019114:Remote Consultation / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D018511:Systems Integration; D019112:Teleradiology / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends