title: Shifts of criteria or neural timing? The assumptions underlying timing perception studies.
abstract: In timing perception studies, the timing of one event is usually manipulated relative to another, and participants are asked to judge if the two events were synchronous, or to judge which of the two events occurred first. Responses are analyzed to determine a measure of central tendency, which is taken as an estimate of the timing at which the two events are perceptually synchronous. When these estimates do not coincide with physical synchrony, it is often assumed that the sensory signals are asynchronous, as though the transfer of information concerning one input has been accelerated or decelerated relative to the other. Here we show that, while this is a viable interpretation, it is equally plausible that such effects are driven by shifts in the criteria used to differentiate simultaneous from asynchronous inputs. Our analyses expose important ambiguities concerning the interpretation of simultaneity judgement data, which have hitherto been underappreciated.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, City University London, UK. kielan.yarrow.1@city.ac.uk
authors.forename: Kielan
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Yarrow
authors.forename: Nina
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Jahn
authors.forename: Szonya
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Durant
authors.forename: Derek H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Arnold
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D001307:Auditory Perception; D035841:Behavioral Research / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013998:Time Perception; D014796:Visual Perception; D055815:Young Adult