title: Feasibility study of performing IGRT system daily QA using a commercial QA device.
abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using a single QA device for comprehensive, efficient daily QA of a linear accelerator (Linac) and three image-guided stereotactic positioning systems (IGSPSs). The Sun Nuclear Daily QA 3 (DQA3) device was used to perform daily dosimetry and mechanical accuracy tests for an Elekta Linac, as well as daily image geometric and isocenter coincidence accuracy tests for three IGSPSs: the AlignRT surface imaging system; the frameless SonArray optical tracking System (FSA) and the Elekta kV CBCT. The DQA3 can also be used for couch positioning, repositioning, and rotational tests during the monthly QA. Based on phantom imaging, the Linac coordinate system determined using AlignRT was within 0.7 mm/0.6° of that of the CBCT system. The difference is attributable to the different calibration methods that are utilized for these two systems. The laser alignment was within 0.5 mm of the isocenter location determined with the three IGSPSs. The ODI constancy was ± 0.5 mm. For gantry and table angles of 0°, the mean isocenter displacement vectors determined using the three systems were within 0.7 mm and 0.6° of one another. Isocenter rotational offsets measured with the systems were all ≤ 0.5°. For photon and electron beams tested over a period of eight months, the output was verified to remain within 2%, energy variations were within 2%, and the symmetry and flatness were within 1%. The field size and light-radiation coincidence were within 1mm ± 1 mm. For dosimetry reproducibility, the standard deviation was within 0.2% for all tests and all energies, except for photon energy variation which was 0.6%. The total measurement time for all tasks took less than 15 minutes per QA session compared to 40 minutes with our previous procedure, which utilized an individual QA device for each IGSPS. The DQA3 can be used for accurate and efficient Linac and IGSPS daily QA. It shortens QA device setup time, eliminates errors introduced by changing phantoms to perform different tests, and streamlines the task of performing dosimetric checks.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
authors.forename: Jean L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Peng
authors.forename: Darren
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kahler
authors.forename: Jonathan G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Amdur
authors.forename: Kenneth N
authors.initials: KN
authors.lastname: Vanek
authors.forename: Chihray
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Liu
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D004867:Equipment Design; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005373:Film Dosimetry / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D010315:Particle Accelerators; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D061089:Radiotherapy, Image-Guided / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D013997:Time Factors