title: CRT or CRT-D devices? The case for 'high energy' devices.
abstract: The decision to implant a CRT or CRT-D device is an important one that requires a careful look at the patient and discussion with the patient as to the benefits and risks associated with each approach. The good news is that CRT provided in any device is a robust therapy that improves many measures of heart failure outcome in very high-risk patients. We argue that in most circumstances, it is much easier to turn a tachycardia device off than not to have the benefit of prompt defibrillation should a tachycardia event occur. While cost is always a consideration, the responsibility of the physician is to individualize patient care and advocate for each patient, based upon the best available therapies.
authors.affiliation: Cardiovascular Thoracic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, Suite 322, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. saxon@usc.edu
authors.forename: Leslie A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Saxon
authors.forename: Bruce L
authors.initials: BL
authors.lastname: Wilkoff
mesh_terms: D058409:Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003657:Decision Making; D017147:Defibrillators, Implantable / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006333:Heart Failure / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans