title: Nonclinical use of online social networking sites: new and old challenges to medical professionalism.
abstract: The AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA) has written a position paper on how social medical use challenges medical professionalism. The report offers persuasive ethical and practical guidelines for nonclinical internet use, specifically for social networking. This commentary provides a framework from which to apply these guidelines, but adds that there may be important situations in which physicians are not able to act in accordance. The guidelines call for professional reporting of questionable online portrayals or behaviors, but this commentary argues that this may be not only cumbersome to implement, but may violate aspects of constitutional rights. While online social networking may in many ways be a new application of old challenges, there may be other aspects that require novel approaches to medical professionalism.
authors.affiliation: College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA. lathompson@peds.ufl.edu
authors.forename: Lindsay A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.forename: Erik W
authors.initials: EW
authors.lastname: Black
mesh_terms: D026683:Advisory Committees; D000574:American Medical Association; D002140:California; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet / Q000941:ethics*; D016365:Liability, Legal; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics; D010820:Physicians / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000941:ethics*; D018907:Privacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012931:Social Environment; D014481:United States