title: Measuring the approximate number system.
abstract: Recent theories in numerical cognition propose the existence of an approximate number system (ANS) that supports the representation and processing of quantity information without symbols. It has been claimed that this system is present in infants, children, and adults, that it supports learning of symbolic mathematics, and that correctly harnessing the system during tuition will lead to educational benefits. Various experimental tasks have been used to investigate individuals' ANSs, and it has been assumed that these tasks measure the same system. We tested the relationship across six measures of the ANS. Surprisingly, despite typical performance on each task, adult participants' performances across the tasks were not correlated, and estimates of the acuity of individuals' ANSs from different tasks were unrelated. These results highlight methodological issues with tasks typically used to measure the ANS and call into question claims that individuals use a single system to complete all these tasks.
authors.affiliation: Learning Sciences Research Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. C.Gilmore@lboro.ac.uk
authors.forename: Camilla
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gilmore
authors.forename: Nina
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Attridge
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Inglis
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D013561:Symbolism; D055815:Young Adult