title: Theory of mind in dogs: is the perspective-taking task a good test?
abstract: Udell, Dorey, and Wynne (in press) have reported an experiment in which wolves, shelter dogs, and pet dogs all showed a significant preference for begging from a person who faced them (seer) over a person whose back was turned to them (blind experimenter). On tests with the blind person's eyes covered with a bucket, a book, or a camera, pet dogs showed more preference for the seer than did wolves and shelter dogs. We agree with the authors' position that most of these findings are best explained by preexperimental learning experienced by the subjects. We argue, however, that the perspective-taking task is not a good test of the domestication theory or of the theory of mind in dogs. The problem we see is that use of the perspective-taking task, combined with preexperimental learning in all the subjects, strongly biases the outcome in favor of a behavioral learning interpretation. Tasks less influenced by preexperimental training would provide less confounded tests of domestication and theory of mind.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. roberts@uwo.ca
authors.forename: William A
authors.initials: WA
authors.lastname: Roberts
authors.forename: Krista
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Macpherson
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D056345:Theory of Mind; D019596:Wolves / Q000523:psychology*