title: Collaborative prescribing: a qualitative exploration of a role for pharmacists in mental health.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Collaborative prescribing has been proposed as an extension of practice for advanced pharmacist practitioners. A lack of research investigating how pharmacists might be most effective as prescribers in mental health was identified.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To explore health professionals' and consumers' attitudes and beliefs that relate to the role of specialist mental health pharmacists working as collaborative prescribers within their advanced scope of practice in secondary care.
  
  
  METHODS
  Semistructured interviews were conducted with key informants in the New Zealand mental health sector. Participants were selected via a purposive sampling method, including health professionals (n=9) and consumers (n=3). NVivo software was used to analyze data, using a thematic analysis approach to develop a series of key themes from the interviews. Common themes were extracted, which were used to gather results and draw conclusions.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The key findings include a widespread acknowledgment of the role of specialist pharmacists as collaborative prescribers in mental health and as integral members of the multidisciplinary team; however, consumers were unaware of pharmacists' role in secondary care. The role was seen to extend current practice particularly in medication management after assessment and diagnosis by a medical practitioner. Concerns regarding demonstrating competence, practitioner role/boundary confusion, insufficient training and workforce development, hesitancy by pharmacists to extend role, consumer awareness, and public perception of the traditional pharmacist role were identified. Solutions discussed included education by the profession; relationship building, training, and robust competency assessments; and a structured framework for implementing a collaborative prescribing model.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study suggests there was recognition and acceptance of the role that specialist pharmacist practitioners could play in contributing to the care of mental health consumers as collaborative prescribers; their medication expertise being regarded highly. Further research is necessary to investigate how current resource constraints will allow for collaborative prescribing to be implemented within the context of mental health practice.
authors.affiliation: School of Human Services, Griffith Health, Griffith University, Australia. a.wheeler@grifith.edu.au
authors.forename: Amanda
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Wheeler
authors.forename: Keith
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Crump
authors.forename: Monica
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Leigh
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Ashna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Patel
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.forename: Jenny
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Zhao
authors.forename: Maree
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Jensen
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001364:Awareness; D003156:Community Mental Health Services; D003157:Community Pharmacy Services; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D011307:Drug Prescriptions; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D009520:New Zealand; D009722:Nurse Practitioners / Q000523:psychology; D010348:Patient Care Team; D010465:Perception; D010595:Pharmacists / Q000523:psychology; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology; D024382:Professional Role; D011639:Public Opinion; D036301:Qualitative Research; D021641:Recognition, Psychology