title: Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
abstract: The object of this study was to compare of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in image quality and diagnostic performance. We assembled 80 masses and 80 microcalcifications. Images were displayed on workstation, 5M, and 3M PACS monitors. The image quality for mammograms on workstation was significantly better than that for mammograms on PACS monitors. The sensitivity and NPV for microcalcifications on workstation were higher than those on PACS monitors. The conventional PACS cannot substitute for a FFDM workstation for mammographic evaluation.
authors.affiliation: Departments of Radiology, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, South Korea.
authors.forename: Bong Joo
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Kang
authors.forename: Sung Hun
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Byung Gil
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Choi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D019540:Area Under Curve; D001707:Biopsy, Needle; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D002114:Calcinosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D016288:Computer Terminals / Q000592:standards; D003626:Data Display / Q000592:standards; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography / Q000295:instrumentation*; D008875:Middle Aged; D012372:ROC Curve; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation*; D011873:Radiology Information Systems; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014584:User-Computer Interface