title: Context effects and observer bias--implications for forensic odontology.
abstract: Psychologists have long recognized the effects of contextual and extraneous information on decision making. Such information renders the subject susceptible to both motivational and cognitive bias; yet, it is difficult to assess the extent to which these influence forensic odontologists opinions as there have been no studies to date on this subject. This article explores the various types of contextual effects and biasing influences that potentially impact on the analysis of bitemarks in forensic odontology. It appears that the current practice of bitemark analysis is rich in sources of potentially biasing influences. In addition to the fundamental recognition that some form of bias is likely to exist, ways in which these should be minimized include: separation of the collection and analysis phases; limiting the amount of contextual information available to the odontologist responsible for the analysis; and ensuring that evidence that is ambiguous or of poor quality is identified as such prior to analysis.
authors.affiliation: University of Newcastle, School of Health Sciences, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, Australia.
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Page
authors.forename: Jane
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Matt
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Blenkin
mesh_terms: D001734:Bites, Human; D003071:Cognition; D003657:Decision Making; D004644:Emotions; D005553:Forensic Dentistry; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D035846:Law Enforcement; D015588:Observer Variation