title: Dissociative identity disorder: Medicolegal challenges.
abstract: Persons with dissociative identity disorder (DID) often present in the criminal justice system rather than the mental health system and perplex experts in both professions. DID is a controversial diagnosis with important medicolegal implications. Defendants have claimed that they committed serious crimes, including rape or murder, while they were in a dissociated state. Asserting that their alter personality committed the bad act, defendants have pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI). In such instances, forensic experts are asked to assess the defendant for DID and provide testimony in court. Debate continues over whether DID truly exists, whether expert testimony should be allowed into evidence, and whether it should exculpate defendants for their criminal acts. This article reviews historical and theoretical perspectives on DID, presents cases that illustrate the legal implications and controversies of raising an insanity defense based on multiple personalities, and examines the role of forensic experts asked to comment on DID with the goal of assisting clinicians in the medicolegal assessment of DID in relation to crimes.
authors: Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. hfarrell@bidmc.harvard.edu
authors: Helen M
authors: HM
authors: Farrell
mesh_terms: D009105:Dissociative Identity Disorder / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry; D006801:Humans; D007298:Insanity Defense