title: On euthanasia, resistance, and redemption: the moralities and politics of a hospice.
abstract: Euthanasia/assisted dying, the desire to hasten death, and religious supportive care at the end of life are controversial issues that have been heavily debated within the academic and medical communities. Little research has been done on hospice patients' views, despite hospices being political spaces, espousing a range of perspectives on assisted dying, religiosity, and "good deaths." In this article I document the presence, articulation, and significance of these issues as perceived and experienced by 20 hospice inpatients in the last 4 weeks of their lives. Key themes to emerge included polarization in desire for hastened death and assisted dying in the hospice; the hospice as a morally bound space situated within particular notions of "dying well"; and the divisive character of religion as part of formalized hospice care. Theoretically, the participants' perspectives on euthanasia/assisted dying and religiosity in the hospice provide a means of unpacking and revealing the moral economy of modern dying practices and the institutional governance and production of "timely deaths."
authors: School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. a.broom@uq.edu.au
authors: Alex
authors: A
authors: Broom
mesh_terms: D017028:Caregivers / Q000523:psychology; D028601:Euthanasia, Active / Q000941:ethics* / Q000523:psychology; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D006738:Hospices / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D007297:Inpatients / Q000523:psychology*; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D009014:Morals; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011057:Politics; D012067:Religion; D012297:Right to Die / Q000941:ethics; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000941:ethics