title: Comparison of McAuley/fasting insulin indices with ATP III clinical criteria for the diagnosis of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To estimate the prevalence of insulin resistant syndrome (IRS) among newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes and to test their validity against two indices of insulin resistance (IR).
  
  
  METHODS
  Prevalence of IRS was estimated according to the criteria used by ATP III in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the ACE criteria were calculated against two indices of IR namely fasting insulin (FI) level > 12 mU/l and McAuley index (McA) < 5.8. [McA= exp [2.63--0.28 ln(insulin in mU/l) -- 0.31 ln(triglycerides in mmol/l)].
  
  
  RESULTS
  35.7% of patients had IRS by ATP III criteria. 64.3% of patients were insulin resistant by FI and McA in each index. In patients who had IRS with ATP criteria, 80% and 86.6% were found to have McA and FI in the insulin resistant range. Out of the patients who were resistant by McA, only 40.6% had IR by ACE criteria and 93% had shown IR by FI. Out of all patients who did not fulfill the ATP III for IR, 74% and 59% were detected as having IR by fasting insulin and McA respectively. Sensitivity of the ACE criteria when tested against the FI and McA were 37.5% and 40.6%, specificity were 70% and 80%, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  IRS was common among the newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. ACE criteria showed an acceptable specificity but lack adequate sensitivity when compared with the two Indices of insulin resistance. More valid and clinically useful criteria should be available for the accurate diagnosis of IRS in clinical practice.
authors: Departments of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka.
authors: L M
authors: LM
authors: Hettihewa
authors: T P
authors: TP
authors: Weerarathna