title: Micropapillary pattern in serous borderline ovarian tumors: does it matter?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the clinical and prognostic impact of micropapillary pattern in patients with serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOT).
  
  
  METHODS
  We retrospectively assessed 130 consecutive patients with typical (n=97, 74.6%) or micropapillary (n=33, 25.4%) SBOT. Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes were compared between these two groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no significant between-group differences in age, menopausal status, parity, body mass index, cancer antigen 125 concentration, tumor size, tumor rupture, positive cytology, ovarian surface involvement, retrieved lymph nodes, use of laparoscopy, fertility-sparing and ovary-sparing procedures, complete staging and restaging, and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the incidences of advanced stage (II-III) tumors (10.3% vs 36.4%, P=0.001), microinvasion (2.1% vs 15.2%, P=0.012), peritoneal implants (8.3% vs 33.4%, P<0.001), and lymph node involvement (0% vs 21.2%, P<0.001) were significantly higher in patients with micropapillary than with typical SBOT. Five patients with typical (5.2%) and three with micropapillary (9.1%) SBOT had recurrent disease (P=0.418), and one patient (3%) in micropapillary SBOT group died due to the disease (P=0.254). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for patients with typical and micropapillary SBOT were 96% and 86%, respectively (P=0.148). All three patients with micropapillary SBOT who had recurrence had peritoneal implants (one noninvasive and two invasive). Multivariate analysis showed that peritoneal implant was the only significant factor related to DFS (P=0.002).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Because micropapillary SBOT was significantly associated with peritoneal implants, especially invasive implants, and lymph node involvement, complete staging procedures, including lymph node dissection, are recommended. However, micropapillary SBOT itself was not significantly associated with DFS. Peritoneal implant was the only factor independently associated with tumor recurrence.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
authors.forename: Jeong-Yeol
authors.initials: JY
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Dae-Yeon
authors.initials: DY
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Jong-Hyeok
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Yong-Man
authors.initials: YM
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Kyu-Rae
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Young-Tak
authors.initials: YT
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Joo-Hyun
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Nam
mesh_terms: D000236:Adenoma / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D017024:Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; D018293:Cystadenoma, Serous / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D010051:Ovarian Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D011379:Prognosis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D055815:Young Adult