title: Evaluating the impact of a substance use intervention program on the peer status and influence of adolescent peer leaders.
abstract: The current study involved an examination of the impact of a peer-led substance use intervention program on the peer leaders beyond the substance use-related goals of the intervention. Specifically, unintended consequences of an adult-sanctioned intervention on the targeted peer leader change agents were investigated, including whether their participation affected their peer status, social influence, or self perceptions. Twenty-two 7th grade peer-identified intervention leaders were compared to 22 control leaders (who did not experience the intervention) and 146 cohort peers. Three groups of measures were employed: sociometric and behavioral nominations, social cognitive mapping, and leadership self-perceptions. Results indicated that unintended consequences appear to be a legitimate concern for females. Female intervention leaders declined in perceived popularity and liked most nominations over time, whereas males increased in total leader nominations. Explanations for these results are discussed and further directions suggested.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Box 90086, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
authors.forename: Christopher S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Sheppard
authors.forename: Megan
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Golonka
authors.forename: Philip R
authors.initials: PR
authors.lastname: Costanzo
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000294:Adolescent Behavior; D000367:Age Factors; D005260:Female; D006266:Health Education / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007857:Leadership; D008297:Male; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010379:Peer Group; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011594:Psychometrics; D012649:Self Concept; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*