title: Validation of core competencies during residency training in anaesthesiology.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Curriculum development for residency training is increasingly challenging in times of financial restrictions and time limitations. Several countries have adopted the CanMEDS framework for medical education as a model into their curricula of specialty training. The purpose of the present study was to validate the competency goals, as derived from CanMEDS, of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine of the Berlin Charité University Medical Centre, by conducting a staff survey. These goals for the qualification of specialists stipulate demonstrable competencies in seven areas: expert medical action, efficient collaboration in a team, communications with patients and family, management and organisation, lifelong learning, professional behaviour, and advocacy of good health. We had previously developed a catalogue of curriculum items based on these seven core competencies. In order to evaluate the validity of this catalogue, we surveyed anaesthetists at our department in regard to their perception of the importance of each of these items. In addition to the descriptive acquisition of data, it was intended to assess the results of the survey to ascertain whether there were differences in the evaluation of these objectives by specialists and registrars.
  
  
  METHODS
  The questionnaire with the seven adapted CanMEDS Roles included items describing each of their underlying competencies. Each anaesthetist (registrars and specialists) working at our institution in May of 2007 was asked to participate in the survey. Individual perception of relevance was rated for each item on a scale similar to the Likert system, ranging from 1 (highly relevant) to 5 (not at all relevant), from which ratings means were calculated. For determination of reliability, we calculated Cronbach's alpha. To assess differences between subgroups, we performed analysis of variance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All seven roles were rated as relevant. Three of the seven competency goals (expert medical action, efficient collaboration in a team, and communication with patients and family) achieved especially high ratings. Only a few items differed significantly in their average rating between specialists and registrars.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We succeeded in validating the relevance of the adapted seven CanMEDS competencies for residency training within our institution. So far, many countries have adopted the Canadian Model, which indicates the great practicability of this competency-based model in curriculum planning. Roles with higher acceptance should be prioritised in existing curricula. It would be desirable to develop and validate a competency-based curriculum for specialty training in anaesthesiology throughout Germany by conducting a national survey to include specialists as well as registrars in curriculum development.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany. heiderose.ortwein@charite.de
authors.forename: Heiderose
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ortwein
authors.forename: Michel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Knigge
authors.forename: Benno
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Rehberg
authors.forename: Ortrud Vargas
authors.initials: OV
authors.lastname: Hein
authors.forename: Claudia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Spies
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000776:Anesthesiology / Q000193:education*; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards*; D003142:Communication; D004502:Education, Medical, Continuing / Q000592:standards; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000592:standards*; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008297:Male; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires