title: Third International Summit: Current status of sleeve gastrectomy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been performed for morbid obesity in the past 10 years. LSG was originally intended as a first-stage procedure in high-risk patients but has become a stand-alone operation for many bariatric surgeons. Ongoing review is necessary regarding the durability of the weight loss, complications, and need for second-stage operations.
  
  
  METHODS
  The first International Summit for LSG was held in October 2007, the second in March 2009, and this third in December 2010. There were presentations by experts, and, to provide a consensus, a questionnaire was completed by 88 attendees who had >1 year (mean 3.6 ± 1.5, range 1-8) of experience with LSG.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The results of the questionnaire were based on 19,605 LSGs performed within 3.6 ± 1.5 years (228.8 ± 275.0 LSGs/surgeon). LSG had been intended as the sole operation in 86.4% of the cases; in these, a second-second stage became necessary in 2.2%. LSG was completed laparoscopically in 99.7% of the cases. The mean percentage of excess weight loss at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 62.7%, 64.7%, 64.0%, 57.3%, and 60.0%, respectively. The bougie size was 28-60F (mean 36F, 70% blunt tip). Resection began 1.5-7.0 cm (mean 4.8) proximal to the pylorus. Of the surgeons, 67.1% reinforced the staple line, 57% with buttress material and 43% with oversewing. The respondents excised an estimated 92.9% ± 8.0% (median 95.0%) of fundus (i.e., a tiny portion is maintained lateral to the angle of His). A drain is left by 57.6%, usually closed suction. High leaks occurred in 1.3% of cases (range 0-10%); lower leaks occurred in .5%. Intraluminal bleeding occurred in 2.0% of cases. The mortality rate was .1% ± .3%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  According to the questionnaire, presentations, and debates, the weight loss and improvement in diabetes appear to be better than with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and on par with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. High leaks are infrequent but problematic.
authors.affiliation: book@obesitysurgery.com
authors.forename: Mervyn
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Deitel
authors.forename: Michel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gagner
authors.forename: Ann L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Erickson
authors.forename: Ross D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Crosby
mesh_terms: D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; D032921:Consensus; D048909:Diabetes Complications / Q000601:surgery; D005743:Gastrectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D015390:Gastric Bypass / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D005764:Gastroesophageal Reflux / Q000209:etiology; D005773:Gastroscopy / Q000379:methods; D006551:Hernia, Hiatal / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D007902:Length of Stay; D009519:New York City; D009767:Obesity, Morbid / Q000601:surgery*; D012008:Recurrence; D012086:Reoperation; D013529:Surgical Wound Dehiscence / Q000209:etiology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D015431:Weight Loss / Q000502:physiology*