title: Critically engaging: integrating the social and the biomedical in international microbicides research.
abstract: Randomized controlled trials and critical social theory are known not to be happy bedfellows. Such trials are embedded in a positivist view of the world, seeking definitive answers to testable questions; critical social theory questions the methods by which we deem the world knowable and may consider experiments in the biomedical sciences as social artifacts. Yet both of these epistemologically and methodologically divergent fields offer potentially important advances in HIV research. In this paper, we describe collaboration between social and biomedical researchers on a large, publicly funded programme to develop vaginal microbicides for HIV prevention. In terms of critical engagement, having integrated and qualitative social science components in the protocol meant potentially nesting alternative epistemologies at the heart of the randomized controlled trial. The social science research highlighted the fallibility and fragility of trial data by demonstrating inconsistencies in key behavioural measurements. It also foregrounded the disjuncture between biomedical conceptions of microbicides and the meanings and uses of the study gel in the context of users' everyday lives. These findings were communicated to the clinical and epidemiological members of the team on an ongoing basis via a feedback loop, through which new issues of concern could also be debated and, in theory, data collection adjusted to the changing needs of the programme. Although critical findings were taken on board by the trialists, a hierarchy of evidence nonetheless remained that limited the utility of some social science findings. This was in spite of mutual respect between clinical epidemiologists and social scientists, equal representation in management and coordination bodies, and equity in funding for the different disciplines. We discuss the positive role that social science integrated into an HIV prevention trial can play, but nonetheless highlight tensions that remain where a hierarchy of epistemologies exists alongside competing paradigms and priorities.
authors.affiliation: Department of Sociology, University of York, UK. montgomery@york.ac.uk
authors.forename: Catherine M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Montgomery
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pool
mesh_terms: D000890:Anti-Infective Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D035843:Biomedical Research; D017326:Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; D005260:Female; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D019359:Knowledge; D009282:Naphthalenesulfonates / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D011108:Polymers / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012942:Social Sciences; D014622:Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies / Q000627:therapeutic use
chemical_list: D000890:Anti-Infective Agents; D009282:Naphthalenesulfonates; C120231:PRO 2000; D011108:Polymers; D014622:Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies