title: Development and psychometric testing of an instrument to evaluate cognitive skills of evidence based practice in student health professionals.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Health educators need rigorously developed instruments to evaluate cognitive skills relating to evidence based practice (EBP). Previous EBP evaluation instruments have focused on the acquisition and appraisal of the evidence and are largely based in the medical profession. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an EBP evaluation instrument to assess EBP cognitive skills for entry-level health professional disciplines.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine was considered in the development of the 'Knowledge of Research Evidence Competencies' instrument (K-REC). The K-REC was reviewed for content validity. Two cohorts of entry-level students were recruited for the pilot study, those who had been exposed to EBP training (physiotherapy students, n = 24), and who had not been exposed to EBP training (human movement students, n = 76). The K-REC was administered to one cohort of students (n = 24) on two testing occasions to evaluate test-retest reliability. Two raters independently scored the first test occasion (n = 24) to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the marking guidelines. Construct validity was assessed by comparison of the two groups, 'exposed' and 'non-exposed', and the percentage of students achieving a 'pass' score in each of these groups. Item difficulty was established.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Among the 100 participants (24 EBP 'exposed', and 76 EBP 'non-exposed' students), there was a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) difference in the total K-REC scores. The test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the individual items and total scores ranged from moderate to excellent (measured by Cohen's Kappa and ICC, range: 0.62 to perfect agreement).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The K-REC instrument is a valid and reliable evaluation instrument of cognitive skills of EBP in entry-level student health professionals. The instrument is quick to disseminate and easy to score, making it a suitable instrument for health educators to employ to evaluate students' knowledge of EBP or in the evaluation of entry-level EBP training.
authors.affiliation: School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. lucy.lewis@unisa.edu.au
authors.forename: Lucy K
authors.initials: LK
authors.lastname: Lewis
authors.forename: Marie T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: Timothy S
authors.initials: TS
authors.lastname: Olds
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods; D055317:Evidence-Based Practice / Q000193:education* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013336:Students, Health Occupations / Q000523:psychology*