title: Directional movement of entomopathogenic nematodes in response to electrical field: effects of species, magnitude of voltage, and infective juvenile age.
abstract: Entomopathogenic nematodes respond to a variety of stimuli when foraging. Previously, we reported a directional response to electrical fields for two entomopathogenic nematode species; specifically, when electrical fields were generated on agar plates Steinernema glaseri (a nematode that utilizes a cruiser-type foraging strategy) moved to a higher electric potential, whereas Steinernema carpocapsae, an ambush-type forager, moved to a lower potential. Thus, we hypothesized that entomopathogenic nematode directional response to electrical fields varies among species, and may be related to foraging strategy. In this study, we tested the hypothesis by comparing directional response among seven additional nematode species: Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, Heterorhabditis georgiana, Heterorhabditis indica, Heterorhabditis megidis, Steinernema feltiae, Steinernema riobrave, and Steinernema siamkayai. S. carpocapsae and S. glaseri were also included as positive controls. Heterorhabditids tend toward cruiser foraging approaches whereas S. siamkayai is an ambusher and S. feltiae and S. riobrave are intermediate. Additionally, we determined the lowest voltage that would elicit a directional response (tested in S. feltiae and S. carpocapsae), and we investigated the impact of nematode age on response to electrical field in S. carpocapsae. In the experiment measuring diversity of response among species, we did not detect any response to electrical fields among the heterorhabditids except for H. georgiana, which moved to a higher electrical potential; S. glaseri and S. riobrave also moved to a higher potential, whereas S. carpocapsae, S. feltiae, and S. siamkayai moved to a lower potential. Overall our hypothesis that foraging strategy can predict directional response was supported (in the nematodes that exhibited a response). The lowest electric potential that elicited a response was 0.1 V, which is comparable to electrical potential associated with some insects and plant roots. The level of response to electrical potential diminished with nematode age. These results expand our knowledge of electrical fields as cues that may be used by entomopathogenic nematodes for host-finding or other aspects of navigation in the soil.
authors.affiliation: USDA-ARS, Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Lab, 21 Dunbar Road, Byron, GA 31008, United States. David.Shapiro@ars.usda.gov
authors.forename: David I
authors.initials: DI
authors.lastname: Shapiro-Ilan
authors.forename: Edwin E
authors.initials: EE
authors.lastname: Lewis
authors.forename: James F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: Daniel B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Kim-Shapiro
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D006790:Host-Parasite Interactions; D008018:Life Cycle Stages / Q000502:physiology; D009068:Movement; D010572:Pest Control, Biological / Q000379:methods*; D011930:Reaction Time; D017172:Rhabditoidea / Q000502:physiology*; D012684:Sensory Thresholds; D013045:Species Specificity