title: In vitro rumen fermentation and methane production are influenced by active components of essential oils combined with fumarate.
abstract: Two trials were conducted to identify the optimal levels of essential oil active components (EOAC) and their combination with fumarate on in vitro rumen fermentation. In trial 1, eugenol, carvacrol, citral and cinnamaldehyde were mixed at ratios of 1:2:3:4, 2:1:4:3, 3:4:1:2, 4:3:2:1 and 1:1:1:1 to make up five combinations (EOAC1, EOAC2, EOAC3, EOAC4 and EOAC5 respectively). The mixtures were supplied at levels of 0, 50, 200 or 500 mg/l to identify the optimal combination for methane reduction. Methane production and ammonia nitrogen were decreased by adding EOAC, irrespective of component compounds, but the production of gas and total volatile fatty acids (VFA) were also decreased. Hydrogen balance analysis indicated that the ratio of hydrogen consumed via methane to hydrogen consumed via VFA was lowest at 200 mg/l of EOAC5 treatment, from which the proportional change in methane was more than the change in VFA, with 31.5% of methane reduction and 12.9% of VFA reduction. In trial 2, 200 mg/l of EOAC5 was added with 0, 5, 10 and 15 mm monosodium fumarate to see whether fumarate had a further effect on rumen fermentation. The addition of fumarate had no influence on gas production, but it further decreased methane and increased the total VFA in comparison with EOAC added solely, with the greatest decrease occurring in methane (78.1%) from 10 mm of fumarate. Quantification of the microbial populations in rumen fluids by RT-PCR showed that methanogen, protozoa, fungi, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens populations were significantly decreased by EOAC5, but were not influenced by fumarate. In summary, the addition of EOAC had consistent effects on rumen fermentation parameters, but high levels of EOAC would induce the inhibition of rumen fermentation. Adding fumarate can enhance the methane-inhibiting effect of EOAC, and the decrease was higher than that calculated stoichiometrically.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Dairy Science, MoE Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lin
authors.forename: J H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.forename: Q
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Liang
authors.forename: J X
authors.initials: JX
authors.lastname: Liu
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005285:Fermentation; D005650:Fumarates / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D008697:Methane / Q000378:metabolism*; D008954:Models, Biological; D009822:Oils, Volatile / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012417:Rumen / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D005650:Fumarates; D009822:Oils, Volatile; C032005:fumaric acid; D008697:Methane