title: Corn silage versus corn silage:alfalfa hay mixtures for dairy cows: effects of dietary potassium, calcium, and cation-anion difference.
abstract: Corn silage (CS) has replaced alfalfa hay (AH) and haylage as the major forage fed to lactating dairy cows, yet many dairy producers believe that inclusion of small amounts of alfalfa hay or haylage improves feed intake and milk production. Alfalfa contains greater concentrations of K and Ca than corn silage and has an inherently higher dietary cation-anion difference (DCAD). Supplemental dietary buffers such as NaHCO(3) and K(2)CO(3) increase DCAD and summaries of studies with these buffers showed improved performance in CS-based diets but not in AH-based diets. We speculated that improvements in performance with AH addition to CS-based diets could be due to differences in mineral and DCAD concentrations between the 2 forages. The objective of this experiment was to test the effects of forage (CS vs. AH) and mineral supplementation on production responses using 45 lactating Holstein cows during the first 20 wk postpartum. Dietary treatments included (1) 50:50 mixture of AH and CS as the forage (AHCS); (2) CS as the sole forage; and (3) CS fortified with mineral supplements (CaCO(3) and K(2)CO(3)) to match the Ca and K content of the AHCS diet (CS-DCAD). Feed intake and milk production were equivalent or greater for cows fed the CS and CS-DCAD diets compared with those fed the AHCS diet. Fat percentage was greater in cows fed the CS compared with the AHCS diet. Fat-corrected milk (FCM; 3.5%) tended to be greater in cows fed the CS and CS-DCAD diets compared with the AHCS diet. Feed efficiencies measured as FCM/dry matter intake were 1.76, 1.80, and 1.94 for the AHCS, CS, and CS-DCAD diets, respectively. The combined effects of reduced feed intake and increased FCM contributed to increased feed efficiency with the CS-DCAD diet, which contained 1.41% K compared with 1.18% K in the CS diet, and we speculate that this might be the result of added dietary K and DCAD effects on digestive efficiency. These results indicate no advantage to including AH in CS-based diets, but suggest that improving mineral supplementation in CS-based diets may increase feed efficiency.
authors.affiliation: Animal and Avian Sciences Department, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA. erdman@umd.edu
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Erdman
authors.forename: L S
authors.initials: LS
authors.lastname: Piperova
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Kohn
mesh_terms: D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D000838:Anions / Q000378:metabolism; D001835:Body Weight / Q000502:physiology; D002118:Calcium / Q000378:metabolism*; D002412:Cations / Q000378:metabolism; D002417:Cattle / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D003612:Dairying; D004032:Diet / Q000662:veterinary*; D004435:Eating / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D007774:Lactation / Q000502:physiology; D000455:Medicago sativa / Q000378:metabolism*; D017419:Potassium, Dietary / Q000378:metabolism*; D011897:Random Allocation; D012820:Silage; D003313:Zea mays / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D000838:Anions; D002412:Cations; D017419:Potassium, Dietary; D002118:Calcium