title: Red state, blue state, flu state: media self-selection and partisan gaps in Swine flu vaccinations.
abstract: This study assesses the relationship between political partisanship and attitudes and behavior with respect to the H1N1 virus (swine flu) crisis of 2009 in general, and the U.S. mass vaccination program in particular. I argue that even seemingly nonpartisan political issues like public health are increasingly characterized by partisan polarization in public attitudes and that such polarization is attributable, at least partly, to the breakdown of the information commons that characterized the U.S. mass media from roughly the 1950s until the early 1990s. In its place has arisen an increasingly fragmented and niche-oriented media marketplace in which individuals are better able to limit their information exposure to attitudes and opinions that reinforce, rather than challenge, their preexisting beliefs. I test my argument against a variety of data sources, including opinion surveys and state-level swine flu vaccination rate data.
authors.affiliation: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Department of Government, Harvard University, USA.
authors.forename: Matthew A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Baum
mesh_terms: D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D017589:Immunization Programs; D053118:Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype; D007252:Influenza Vaccines / Q000008:administration & dosage; D007251:Influenza, Human / Q000517:prevention & control*; D008402:Mass Media / Q000639:trends; D032541:Mass Vaccination; D011057:Politics; D011639:Public Opinion; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D007252:Influenza Vaccines