title: Comparison of the validity of four fall-related psychological measures in a community-based falls risk screening.
abstract: We examined the measurement properties offall-related psychological instruments with a sample of 133 older adults (M age = 74.4 years, SD = 9.4). Measures included the Comprehensive Falls Risk Screening Instrument, Falls-efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC), modified Survey ofActivities and Fear ofFalling in the Elderly (mSAFFE), Consequences of Falling (CoF), Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The FES-I, ABC, mSAFFE, and CoF were significantly correlated with each othe, with SF-36, and with mobility. The ABC and mSAFFE were significantly correlated with PASE. The ABC differentiated between fallers and nonfallers and predicted total falls risk. Findings can assist with the selection of psychological instruments in a falls risk screening context.
authors.affiliation: Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, USA.
authors.forename: Delilah S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: Rebecca
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ellis
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kosma
authors.forename: Jennifer M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Fabre
authors.forename: Kevin S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: McCarter
authors.forename: Robert H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Wood
mesh_terms: D000058:Accidental Falls / Q000517:prevention & control*; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D018570:Risk Assessment