title: Evaluating the link between self-assembled mesophase structure and drug release.
abstract: Lipid-based liquid crystalline materials are of increasing interest for use as drug delivery systems. The intricate nanostructure of the reversed bicontinuous cubic (V(2)) and inverse hexagonal (H(2)) liquid crystal matrices have been shown to provide diffusion controlled release of actives of varying size and polarity. In this study, we extend the understanding of release to other self-assembled phases, the micellar cubic phase (I(2)) and inverse micelles (L(2)). The systems are comparable as they were all prepared from the one lipid, glyceryl monooleate (GMO), which sequentially forms all four phases with increasing hexadecane (HD) content in excess water. Phase identity was confirmed by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). SAXS data indicated that four mesophases were formed with increasing HD content at 25°C: V(2) phase (Pn3m space group) formed at 0-4% (w/w) HD, H(2) phase formed at 4-25% (w/w) HD, I(2) phase (Fd3m space group) formed at 25-40% (w/w) HD and finally L(2) phase formed at >40% (w/w) HD. Analogous compositions using phytantriol rather than GMO as the core lipid did not produce the I(2) phase, with only V(2) to H(2) to L(2) transitions being apparent with increasing HD concentration. In order to relate the liquid crystal phase structure to drug release rate, in vitro release tests were conducted by incorporating radio-labelled glucose as a model hydrophilic drug into the four GMO-based mesophases. It was found that the drug release followed first-order diffusion kinetics and was fastest from V(2) followed by L(2), H(2), and I(2). Drug release was shown to be significantly faster from bicontinuous cubic phase than the other mesophases, indicating that the state of the water compartments, whether open or closed, has a great influence on the rate of drug release. It is envisioned that liquid crystalline mesophases with slower release characteristics will more likely have potential applications as sustained release drug delivery systems, and hence that the bicontinuous cubic phase is not necessarily the best choice for a sustained release matrix.
authors.affiliation: Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville Campus), 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
authors.forename: Stephanie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Phan
authors.forename: Wye-Khay
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Fong
authors.forename: Nigel
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kirby
authors.forename: Tracey
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hanley
authors.forename: Ben J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Boyd
mesh_terms: D000473:Alkanes / Q000737:chemistry; D004058:Diffusion; D016503:Drug Delivery Systems; D005233:Fatty Alcohols / Q000737:chemistry; D005947:Glucose / Q000737:chemistry; D005989:Glycerides / Q000737:chemistry*; D050866:Liquid Crystals / Q000737:chemistry*; D008823:Micelles; D053838:Scattering, Small Angle; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry; D014961:X-Ray Diffraction
chemical_list: D000473:Alkanes; D005233:Fatty Alcohols; D005989:Glycerides; D008823:Micelles; D014867:Water; C508873:3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-1,2,3-hexadecanetriol; C005953:monoolein; C007932:n-hexadecane; D005947:Glucose