title: Bonded molar tubes associated with higher failure rate than molar bands.
abstract: METHODS
  The Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, and Conference proceedings and abstracts from the British Orthodontic Conference, European Orthodontic Conference and the International Association of Dental Research were searched.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCT) including those that use a split-mouth design were included. There were no restrictions regarding the language.
  
  
  METHODS
  The selection of papers, decisions about eligibility and data extraction were carried out independently and in duplicate without blinding to the authors, adhesives used or results obtained. All disagreements were resolved by discussion. Comparisons were to be made firstly between any of the five main types of adhesive. If possible, comparisons were to be made within groups and, where appropriate, between chemical- and light-cured adhesives.Meta-analysis was to be undertaken only on studies of similar comparisons reporting the same outcome measures.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Two trials (n = 190), at low risk of bias, were included in the review and both presented data on first time failure at the tooth level. Pooling of the data showed a statistically significant difference in favour of molar bands, with a hazard ratio of 2.92 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.80 to 4.72). No statistically significant heterogeneity was shown between the two studies. Data on first time failure at the patient level were also available and showed a statistically different difference in favour of molar bands (risk ratio 2.30; 95% CI 1.56 to 3.41) (risk of event for molar tubes = 57%; risk of event for molar bands 25%). One trial presented data on decalcification, again showing a statistically significant difference in favour of molar bands. No other adverse events were identified.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  From the two well-designed and low risk of bias trials included in this review it was shown that the failure of molar tubes bonded with either a chemically-cured or light-cured adhesive was considerably higher than that of molar bands cemented with glass ionomer cement. One trial indicated that there was less decalcification with molar bands cemented with glass ionomer cement than with bonded molar tubes cemented with a light-cured adhesive. However, given there are limited data for this outcome, further evidence is required to draw more robust conclusions.
authors: Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
authors: Carlos
authors: C
authors: Flores-Mir