title: The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Joint rehabilitation goals are an important component for effective teamwork in the rehabilitation field. The activities and participation domain of the ICF provides a common language for professionals when setting these goals. Involving clients in the formulation of rehabilitation goals is gaining momentum as part of a person-centred approach to rehabilitation. However, this is particularly difficult when clients have an acquired communication disability. The expressive communication difficulties negatively affect the consensus building process. As a result, obtaining information regarding rehabilitation goals from professionals and their clients warrants further investigation for this particular population.
  
  
  METHODS
  This comparative study investigated clients and their assigned rehabilitation professionals' perception of the importance of ICF activities and participation domains for inclusion in their rehabilitation program. Twelve clients in an acute rehabilitation centre and twenty of their corresponding rehabilitation professionals participated in an activity using the Talking Mats™ visual framework for goal setting. Each participant rated the importance of the nine activities and participation domains of the ICF for inclusion in their current rehabilitation program.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The ICF domains which consistently appear as very important across these groups are mobility, self-care and communication. Domains which consistently appear in the lower third of the rankings include spare time, learning and thinking and domestic life. Results indicate however that no statistical significant differences exist in terms of the individual domains across each of the participant groups. Within group differences however indicated that amongst the speech-language therapists and physiotherapists there was a statistical significant difference between spare time activities and communication and mobility.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Findings indicate that consensus is possible amongst professionals and clients even within an acute-rehabilitation setting. In addition, the Talking Mats™ visual framework appears to be a valid protocol for including clients with acquired communication disabilities in the process of obtaining consensus during goal-setting.
authors: Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, University of Pretoria, Corner of Lynwood and Roper Streets, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa. michal.harty@up.ac.za
authors: Michal
authors: M
authors: Harty
authors: Maryka
authors: M
authors: Griesel
authors: Aletia
authors: A
authors: van der Merwe
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000488:Allied Health Personnel; D003143:Communication Devices for People with Disabilities; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000145:classification* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D005260:Female; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011788:Quality of Life; D012649:Self Concept; D013019:South Africa