title: Where's Waldo? The 'decapitation gambit' and the definition of death.
abstract: The 'decapitation gambit' holds that, if physical decapitation normally entails the death of the human being, then physiological decapitation, evident in cases of total brain failure, entails the death of the human being. This argument has been challenged by Franklin Miller and Robert Truog, who argue that physical decapitation does not necessarily entail the death of human beings and that therefore, by analogy, artificially sustained human bodies with total brain failure are living human beings. They thus challenge the current neurological criterion for determining death and argue for a return to the traditional criterion of the irreversible loss of circulation and respiration. In this paper, I defend the decapitation gambit and total brain failure as a criterion for determining death against Miller and Truog's criticism.
authors: Department of Philosophy, Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, Kutztown, PA 19530, USA. lizza@kutztown.edu
authors: John P
authors: JP
authors: Lizza
mesh_terms: D001293:Attitude to Death; D001926:Brain Death / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D003643:Death; D049248:Decapitation; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D018594:Human Body; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D012119:Respiration; D009626:Terminology as Topic