title: "Can it read my mind?" - What do the public and experts think of the current (mis)uses of neuroimaging?
abstract: Emerging applications of neuroimaging outside medicine and science have received intense public exposure through the media. Media misrepresentations can create a gulf between public and scientific understanding of the capabilities of neuroimaging and raise false expectations. To determine the extent of this effect and determine public opinions on acceptable uses and the need for regulation, we designed an electronic survey to obtain anonymous opinions from as wide a range of members of the public and neuroimaging experts as possible. The surveys ran from 1(st) June to 30 September 2010, asked 10 and 21 questions, respectively, about uses of neuroimaging outside traditional medical diagnosis, data storage, science communication and potential methods of regulation. We analysed the responses using descriptive statistics; 660 individuals responded to the public and 303 individuals responded to the expert survey. We found evidence of public skepticism about the use of neuroimaging for applications such as lie detection or to determine consumer preferences and considerable disquiet about use by employers or government and about how their data would be stored and used. While also somewhat skeptical about new applications of neuroimaging, experts grossly underestimated how often neuroimaging had been used as evidence in court. Although both the public and the experts rated highly the importance of a better informed public in limiting the inappropriate uses to which neuroimaging might be put, opinions differed on the need for, and mechanism of, actual regulation. Neuroscientists recognized the risks of inaccurate reporting of neuroimaging capabilities in the media but showed little motivation to engage with the public. The present study also emphasizes the need for better frameworks for scientific engagement with media and public education.
authors: Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. joanna.wardlaw@ed.ac.uk
authors: Joanna M
authors: JM
authors: Wardlaw
authors: Garret
authors: G
authors: O'Connell
authors: Kirsten
authors: K
authors: Shuler
authors: Janet
authors: J
authors: DeWilde
authors: Jane
authors: J
authors: Haley
authors: Oliver
authors: O
authors: Escobar
authors: Shaun
authors: S
authors: Murray
authors: Robert
authors: R
authors: Rae
authors: Donald
authors: D
authors: Jarvie
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Sandercock
authors: Burkhard
authors: B
authors: Schafer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D003625:Data Collection; D004868:Equipment Failure; D005104:Expert Testimony; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D059906:Neuroimaging / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D011639:Public Opinion; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires