title: Reading is believing: the truth effect and source credibility.
abstract: Five experiments explored how source reliability influences people's tendency to rate statements as more credible when they were encountered earlier (the truth effect). Undergraduates read statements from one reliable source and one unreliable source. Statements read multiple times were perceived as more valid and were more often correctly identified on a general knowledge test than statements read once or not at all. This occurred at varying retention intervals whether the statements originated from a reliable or unreliable source, when people had little memory for the statements themselves or their source, and when the discrediting information about the sources came either before or after reading the facts. While repetition aided recognition and source accuracy, both were unaffected by the reliability of the source. Consistent with the source monitoring framework, familiarity may create an illusion of truth for statements when people lack source-specifying cues, especially cues regarding the reliability of the source.
authors: Department of Psychology, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT 06824, USA. lhenkel@fairfield.edu
authors: Linda A
authors: LA
authors: Henkel
authors: Mark E
authors: ME
authors: Mattson
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D003469:Culture; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D011932:Reading; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D035502:Trust; D055815:Young Adult