title: Dual vs. single computer monitor in a Canadian hospital Archiving Department: a study of efficiency and satisfaction.
abstract: This paper describes a comparative study of clinical coding by Archivists (also known as Clinical Coders in some other countries) using single and dual computer monitors. In the present context, processing a record corresponds to checking the available information; searching for the missing physician information; and finally, performing clinical coding. We collected data for each Archivist during her use of the single monitor for 40 hours and during her use of the dual monitor for 20 hours. During the experimental periods, Archivists did not perform other related duties, so we were able to measure the real-time processing of records. To control for the type of records and their impact on the process time required, we categorised the cases as major or minor, based on whether acute care or day surgery was involved. Overall results show that 1,234 records were processed using a single monitor and 647 records using a dual monitor. The time required to process a record was significantly higher (p= .071) with a single monitor compared to a dual monitor (19.83 vs.18.73 minutes). However, the percentage of major cases was significantly higher (p= .000) in the single monitor group compared to the dual monitor group (78% vs. 69%). As a consequence, we adjusted our results, which reduced the difference in time required to process a record between the two systems from 1.1 to 0.61 minutes. Thus, the net real-time difference was only 37 seconds in favour of the dual monitor system. Extrapolated over a 5-year period, this would represent a time savings of 3.1% and generate a net cost savings of $7,729 CAD (Canadian dollars) for each workstation that devoted 35 hours per week to the processing of records. Finally, satisfaction questionnaire responses indicated a high level of satisfaction and support for the dual-monitor system. The implementation of a dual-monitor system in a hospital archiving department is an efficient option in the context of scarce human resources and has the strong support of Archivists.
authors: Sherbrooke University Hospital Centre UETMIS-CHUS, GREDI-Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. tpoder.chus@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
authors: Thomas G
authors: TG
authors: Poder
authors: Sylvie T
authors: ST
authors: Godbout
authors: Christian
authors: C
authors: Bellemare
mesh_terms: D002170:Canada; D059019:Clinical Coding / Q000458:organization & administration*; D016288:Computer Terminals; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D057286:Electronic Health Records; D005260:Female; D006751:Hospital Information Systems; D006801:Humans; D008497:Medical Record Administrators; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors