title: Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
abstract: The current study examined the degree to which predictions of memory performance made immediately or at a delay are sensitive to confidently held memory illusions. Participants studied unrelated pairs of words and made judgements of learning (JOLs) for each item, either immediately or after a delay. Half of the unrelated pairs (deceptive items; e.g., nurse-dollar) had a semantically related competitor (e.g., doctor) that was easily accessible when given a test cue (e.g., nurse-do_ _ _r) and half had no semantically related competitor (control items; e.g., subject-dollar). Following the study phase, participants were administered a cued recall test. Results from Experiment 1 showed that memory performance was less accurate for deceptive compared with control items. In addition, delaying judgement improved the relative accuracy of JOLs for control items but not for deceptive items. Subsequent experiments explored the degree to which the relative accuracy of delayed JOLs for deceptive items improved as a result of a warning to ensure that retrieved memories were accurate (Experiment 2) and corrective feedback regarding the veracity of information retrieved prior to making a JOL (Experiment 3). In all, these data suggest that delayed JOLs may be largely insensitive to memory errors unless participants are provided with feedback regarding memory accuracy.
authors: Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876, USA. matthew.rhodes@colostate.edu
authors: Matthew G
authors: MG
authors: Rhodes
authors: Sarah K
authors: SK
authors: Tauber
mesh_terms: D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D013997:Time Factors