title: [Impact of magnetic resonance therapy on sickness absence of patients with nerve root irritation following a lumbar disc problem].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The prevalence of spinal symptoms in Western industrialised countries ranges up to 80 %. Back pain ranks second among the most common reasons to seek medical advice. The resulting financial burden on the health-care system is proportional to the subjectively experienced pain. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the use of magnetic resonance therapy alters the duration of sickness absence in patients with discogenic radiculopathy.
  
  
  METHODS
  In a double-blind prospective randomised study, the use of magnetic resonance therapy for back pain in patients with discogenic radiculopathy was evaluated in the context of health economics. Patients aged 20 to 55 years with lumboischialgia and no indication for surgery were included in the study. The primary variable was the number of days of sickness absence in a study group before and after magnetic field therapy, and in a control group. The number of days of sickness absence was determined on the basis of a pain diary and by telephone inquiry.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Patients who were treated with an activated magnetic resonance therapy device had significantly fewer days of sickness absence (p = 0.009) when evaluated by personal telephone calls. The duration of sickness absence before therapy was 14.7 days and that after therapy 5.8 days. In contrast, the days of sickness absence in the control group were 7.6 days before therapy and 13.8 days after therapy. The duration of symptoms was negatively correlated with the days of sickness absence. Patients who reported a burden at work had more days of sickness absence (8.3 days) than those with no burden at work (3.2 days). This correlation does not apply to familial burden. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed different degrees of compensation of the cost of magnetic resonance therapy, depending on the occupational group. Direct and indirect costs of magnetic resonance therapy were compensated by 16.9 fewer days of sickness absence among workers, 11.4 fewer days of sickness absence among employees, and 9.1 fewer days of sickness absence among civil servants.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Based on the number of days of sickness absence, the study confirmed that a relatively economical alternative technique is able to provide pain relief as well as benefit the health economy. Unemployed patients or patients who have submitted an application for a pension may be problematic because they may not wish to be pronounced healthy by their doctors.
authors: Radiologietechnologie, FH-Campus Wien, Österreich. gabriele.salomonowitz@fh-campuswien.ac.at
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Salomonowitz
authors: H
authors: H
authors: Salfinger
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Hahne
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Friedrich
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001317:Austria; D000529:Complementary Therapies / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000150:complications* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000191:economics / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D009682:Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011843:Radiculopathy / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000191:economics / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D012050:Rehabilitation, Vocational / Q000191:economics; D018582:Sick Leave; D055815:Young Adult