title: A multi-compartment model for interneurons in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.
abstract: GABAergic interneurons (INs) in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) shape the information flow from retina to cortex, presumably by controlling the number of visually evoked spikes in geniculate thalamocortical (TC) neurons, and refining their receptive field. The INs exhibit a rich variety of firing patterns: Depolarizing current injections to the soma may induce tonic firing, periodic bursting or an initial burst followed by tonic spiking, sometimes with prominent spike-time adaptation. When released from hyperpolarization, some INs elicit rebound bursts, while others return more passively to the resting potential. A full mechanistic understanding that explains the function of the dLGN on the basis of neuronal morphology, physiology and circuitry is currently lacking. One way to approach such an understanding is by developing a detailed mathematical model of the involved cells and their interactions. Limitations of the previous models for the INs of the dLGN region prevent an accurate representation of the conceptual framework needed to understand the computational properties of this region. We here present a detailed compartmental model of INs using, for the first time, a morphological reconstruction and a set of active dendritic conductances constrained by experimental somatic recordings from INs under several different current-clamp conditions. The model makes a number of experimentally testable predictions about the role of specific mechanisms for the firing properties observed in these neurons. In addition to accounting for the significant features of all experimental traces, it quantitatively reproduces the experimental recordings of the action-potential- firing frequency as a function of injected current. We show how and why relative differences in conductance values, rather than differences in ion channel composition, could account for the distinct differences between the responses observed in two different neurons, suggesting that INs may be individually tuned to optimize network operation under different input conditions.
authors: IMT, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway. geir.halnes@umb.no
authors: Geir
authors: G
authors: Halnes
authors: Sigita
authors: S
authors: Augustinaite
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Heggelund
authors: Gaute T
authors: GT
authors: Einevoll
authors: Michele
authors: M
authors: Migliore
mesh_terms: D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D002118:Calcium / Q000378:metabolism; D019295:Computational Biology; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003712:Dendrites / Q000502:physiology; D055724:Electrophysiological Phenomena; D005829:Geniculate Bodies / Q000166:cytology* / Q000502:physiology*; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D007395:Interneurons / Q000502:physiology*; D007473:Ion Channels / Q000378:metabolism; D007700:Kinetics; D051379:Mice; D008822:Mice, Transgenic; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000166:cytology / Q000502:physiology; D018408:Patch-Clamp Techniques; D013569:Synapses / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D007473:Ion Channels; D002118:Calcium