Identifying and prioritizing greater sage-grouse nesting and brood-rearing habitat for conservation in human-modified landscapes.
BACKGROUND
Balancing animal conservation and human use of the landscape is an ongoing scientific and practical challenge throughout the world. We investigated reproductive success in female greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) relative to seasonal patterns of resource selection, with the larger goal of developing a spatially-explicit framework for managing human activity and sage-grouse conservation at the landscape level.


RESULTS
We integrated field-observation, Global Positioning Systems telemetry, and statistical modeling to quantify the spatial pattern of occurrence and risk during nesting and brood-rearing. We linked occurrence and risk models to provide spatially-explicit indices of habitat-performance relationships. As part of the analysis, we offer novel biological information on resource selection during egg-laying, incubation, and night. The spatial pattern of occurrence during all reproductive phases was driven largely by selection or avoidance of terrain features and vegetation, with little variation explained by anthropogenic features. Specifically, sage-grouse consistently avoided rough terrain, selected for moderate shrub cover at the patch level (within 90 m(2)), and selected for mesic habitat in mid and late brood-rearing phases. In contrast, risk of nest and brood failure was structured by proximity to anthropogenic features including natural gas wells and human-created mesic areas, as well as vegetation features such as shrub cover.


CONCLUSIONS
Risk in this and perhaps other human-modified landscapes is a top-down (i.e., human-mediated) process that would most effectively be minimized by developing a better understanding of specific mechanisms (e.g., predator subsidization) driving observed patterns, and using habitat-performance indices such as those developed herein for spatially-explicit guidance of conservation intervention. Working under the hypothesis that industrial activity structures risk by enhancing predator abundance or effectiveness, we offer specific recommendations for maintaining high-performance habitat and reducing low-performance habitat, particularly relative to the nesting phase, by managing key high-risk anthropogenic features such as industrial infrastructure and water developments.
Hayden-Wing Associates LLC, Natural Resource Consultants, Laramie, Wyoming, United States of America. matt@haydenwing.com
Matthew R
MR
Dzialak
Chad V
CV
Olson
Seth M
SM
Harju
Stephen L
SL
Webb
James P
JP
Mudd
Jeffrey B
JB
Winstead
L D
LD
Hayden-Wing
D000818:Animals; D001717:Birds / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D003624:Darkness; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D005843:Geography; D006801:Humans; D008018:Life Cycle Stages; D008954:Models, Biological; D009425:Nesting Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D010058:Oviposition / Q000502:physiology; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012307:Risk Factors