Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
OBJECTIVE
The effectiveness of hearing protection devices (HPDs), when used in workplace conditions, has been shown over the years to be usually lower than the labeled values obtained under well-controlled laboratory conditions. Causes for such discrepancies have been listed and discussed by many authors. This study is an attempt to understand the issues in greater details and quantify some of these factors by looking at the performance of hearing protectors as a function of time during full work shift conditions.


METHODS
A non-invasive field microphone in the real ear (F-MIRE)-based method has been developed for measuring the effectiveness of different HPDs as a function of time in the workplace. Details of the test procedures, the equipment used, and the post-processing operations are presented and discussed. The methodology was developed in such a way that a complete time and frequency representation are possible. The system was used on a total of 24 workers in eight different companies. Work shifts of up to 9-h long were recorded. Various types of earmuffs and one type of molded earplugs were tested.


RESULTS
Attenuation data reported as a function of time showed, for most workers tested, considerable fluctuations over entire work shift periods. Parts of these fluctuations are attributed to variations in the low-frequency content in the noise (in particular for earmuffs) as well as poor insertion and/or fitting of earplugs. Lower performances than laboratory-based ones were once again observed for most cases tested but also, important left and right ear differences were obtained for many individuals. When reported as a function of frequency, the attenuation results suggested that the few approximations used to relate the measurements to subjective real-ear-attenuation-at-threshold (REAT) data were realistic.


CONCLUSIONS
The use of individualized attenuation data and performance ratings for HPDs as well as a good knowledge of the ambient noise in the workplace are key ingredients when evaluating the performance of hearing protectors in field conditions.
Service de la recherche, Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et Sécurité au Travail, 505, Boulevard de Maisonneuve Ouest, Montréal, Québec H3A 3C2, Canada. nelisse.hugues@irsst.qc.ca
Hugues
H
Nélisse
Marc-André
MA
Gaudreau
Jérôme
J
Boutin
Jérémie
J
Voix
Frédéric
F
Laville
D000328:Adult; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D004430:Ear Protective Devices / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006317:Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009623:Noise, Occupational / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000517:prevention & control; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000032:analysis / Q000517:prevention & control; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D017132:Workplace; D055815:Young Adult