Correlations between the surface ECG and the intracavitary electrocardiogram in typical atrial flutter.
Typical atrial flutter (cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent) has as an electrophysiological substrate a macro-reentry circuit localized in the right atrium. Depending on the right atrial depolarization sequence, the rotation of the macro-reentry circuit can be counterclockwise (with an inferior to superior activation of the right atrium free wall and superior to inferior activation of the interatrial septum), characterized by negative F waves in inferior leads (DII, DIII, aVF) and V6, and positive in V1 on the surface electrogram (ECG), or clockwise (with a superior to inferior activation of the right atrium free wall and inferior to superior activation of the interatrial septum) characterized by positive F waves in inferior leads (DII, DIII, aVF) and V6, and negative in V1. Nevertheless, it is considered that for the diagnosis of the typical or atypical nature of this arrhythmia, the surface ECG has limited value. The purpose of this study was to compare the relationship between the flutter rotation sequence determined by the intracavitary electrogram and the morphology of the F waves on the surface ECG.


METHODS
The study included 387 patients admitted to the Cardiology - Rehabilitation Hospital from Cluj-Napoca between January 2007 and May 2010, diagnosed with typical atrial flutter during an electrophysiological study. Using the intracavitary electrograms the flutter rotation sequence was determined (clockwise or counterclockwise). The F waves' aspect on the surface ECG in leads DII, DIII, aVF, aVL, V1 and V6 was then analyzed.


RESULTS
One hundred and fifty two patients (39.3%) were diagnosed with clockwise atrial flutter and 235 patients (60.7%) with counterclockwise atrial flutter. The positive predictive value (PPV) of negative F waves in inferior leads and positive in V1 was, in the case of counterclockwise atrial flutter 98%; the negative predictive value (NPV) was 79%; sensitivity (Se) was 83% and specificity (Sp) was 97%. For typical clockwise atrial flutter, the PPV of the positive F waves in the inferior leads and negative in V1 was 94% (p < 0.001); the NPV was 85%; Se was 73% and Sp was 97%.


CONCLUSIONS
The surface ECG has a high value in determining the macroreentry circuit rotation sequence in the case of typical atrial flutter.
SCU Cluj-Napoca, Cardiology - Rehabilitation Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
R
R
Roşu
L
L
Mureşan
M
M
Andronache
Dana
D
Pop
C
C
Pop
Maria
M
Puşchiţă
Adina
A
Mălai
G
G
Guşeţu
D
D
Zdrenghea
D001282:Atrial Flutter / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology; D004562:Electrocardiography / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D006325:Heart Atria / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests