The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control.
BACKGROUND
It is widely believed that both feed-forward and feed-back mechanisms are required for successful object manipulation. Open-loop upper-limb prosthesis wearers receive no tactile feedback, which may be the cause of their limited dexterity and compromised grip force control. In this paper we ask whether observed prosthesis control impairments are due to lack of feedback or due to inadequate feed-forward control.


METHODS
Healthy subjects were fitted with a closed-loop robotic hand and instructed to grasp and lift objects of different weights as we recorded trajectories and force profiles. We conducted three experiments under different feed-forward and feed-back configurations to elucidate the role of tactile feedback (i) in ideal conditions, (ii) under sensory deprivation, and (iii) under feed-forward uncertainty.


RESULTS
(i) We found that subjects formed economical grasps in ideal conditions. (ii) To our surprise, this ability was preserved even when visual and tactile feedback were removed. (iii) When we introduced uncertainty into the hand controller performance degraded significantly in the absence of either visual or tactile feedback. Greatest performance was achieved when both sources of feedback were present.


CONCLUSIONS
We have introduced a novel method to understand the cognitive processes underlying grasping and lifting. We have shown quantitatively that tactile feedback can significantly improve performance in the presence of feed-forward uncertainty. However, our results indicate that feed-forward and feed-back mechanisms serve complementary roles, suggesting that to improve on the state-of-the-art in prosthetic hands we must develop prostheses that empower users to correct for the inevitable uncertainty in their feed-forward control.
Institute of Perception, Action and Behaviour, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, UK. i.saunders@sms.ed.ac.uk
Ian
I
Saunders
Sethu
S
Vijayakumar
D000328:Adult; D001186:Artificial Limbs / Q000592:standards*; D056228:Feedback, Sensory / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand / Q000503:physiopathology; D018737:Hand Strength / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010291:Paresis / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D012371:Robotics / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D055698:Touch Perception / Q000502:physiology; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult