Biosecurity and yield improvement technologies are strategic complements in the fight against food insecurity.
The delivery of food security via continued crop yield improvement alone is not an effective food security strategy, and must be supported by pre- and post-border biosecurity policies to guard against perverse outcomes. In the wake of the green revolution, yield gains have been in steady decline, while post-harvest crop losses have increased as a result of insufficiently resourced and uncoordinated efforts to control spoilage throughout global transport and storage networks. This paper focuses on the role that biosecurity is set to play in future food security by preventing both pre- and post-harvest losses, thereby protecting crop yield. We model biosecurity as a food security technology that may complement conventional yield improvement policies if the gains in global farm profits are sufficient to offset the costs of implementation and maintenance. Using phytosanitary measures that slow global spread of the Ug99 strain of wheat stem rust as an example of pre-border biosecurity risk mitigation and combining it with post-border surveillance and invasive alien species control efforts, we estimate global farm profitability may be improved by over US$4.5 billion per annum.
Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, Bunbury, Western Australia, Australia. david.cook@agric.wa.gov.au
David C
DC
Cook
Rob W
RW
Fraser
Dean R
DR
Paini
Andrew C
AC
Warden
W Mark
WM
Lonsdale
Paul J
PJ
De Barro
D000383:Agriculture / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D018556:Crops, Agricultural / Q000254:growth & development*; D005523:Food Supply / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D005524:Food Technology / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D038622:Internationality; D008954:Models, Biological; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D014908:Triticum / Q000191:economics / Q000254:growth & development