Evaluating research mentors working in the area of clinical translational science: a review of the literature.
The goal of this paper is to review the evaluation of mentors with a focus on training new investigators in clinical translational science. These scholars include physicians and Ph.D. scientists who are generally assistant professors in clinical departments. This white paper is one of a series of articles focused on the programmatic elements of effective mentoring practices and the "current state of the art." Evaluating mentor performance and providing formative feedback can lead to stronger mentoring and ultimately lead to increased success of new clinical and translational investigators. While there is general agreement that mentor evaluation can be helpful, the process is difficult. Trainees are reluctant to share negative experiences and to rate their mentors. Mentors are not sure they want to be evaluated. Program leaders are not sure how to effectively use the information. This white paper provides mentees, mentors, and program leaders with new perspectives on mentor evaluation and ideas for future research.
Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. emma@exchange.upenn.edu
Emma
E
Meagher
Lauren
L
Taylor
Jeff
J
Probsfield
Mike
M
Fleming
D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D008611:Mentors / Q000193:education*; D017145:Models, Educational; D057170:Translational Research, Biomedical / Q000193:education*