title: Energetic consequences of thermal and nonthermal food processing.
abstract: Processing food extensively by thermal and nonthermal techniques is a unique and universal human practice. Food processing increases palatability and edibility and has been argued to increase energy gain. Although energy gain is a well-known effect from cooking starch-rich foods, the idea that cooking meat increases energy gain has never been tested. Moreover, the relative energetic advantages of cooking and nonthermal processing have not been assessed, whether for meat or starch-rich foods. Here, we describe a system for characterizing the energetic effects of cooking and nonthermal food processing. Using mice as a model, we show that cooking substantially increases the energy gained from meat, leading to elevations in body mass that are not attributable to differences in food intake or activity levels. The positive energetic effects of cooking were found to be superior to the effects of pounding in both meat and starch-rich tubers, a conclusion further supported by food preferences in fasted animals. Our results indicate significant contributions from cooking to both modern and ancestral human energy budgets. They also illuminate a weakness in current food labeling practices, which systematically overestimate the caloric potential of poorly processed foods.
authors: Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. carmody@fas.harvard.edu
authors: Rachel N
authors: RN
authors: Carmody
authors: Gil S
authors: GS
authors: Weintraub
authors: Richard W
authors: RW
authors: Wrangham
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D001835:Body Weight; D003296:Cooking / Q000379:methods; D002149:Energy Intake / Q000502:physiology*; D005511:Food Handling / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008460:Meat; D051379:Mice; D008817:Mice, Mutant Strains; D035281:Plant Tubers / Q000737:chemistry