title: Stunning and shackling influences on quality of porcine Longissimus dorsi and Semimembranosus muscles.
abstract: Seventy-one barrows of three porcine genotypes (nn, Nn and NN genotypes with respect to halothane) were electrically stunned on the right side and randomly assigned to one of three treatments during the bleeding process (prone, PR; shackled left, SL; or shackled right, SR) to investigate the influence of both shackling and stunning on ultimate meat quality. PR carcasses had less side-to-side variation in 40 min pH than either SL or SR carcasses. Shackling contributed to a decreased 40 min pH in the semimembranosus (SM) and posterior longissimus dorsi (PL). The effects of stunning appeared to be additive when combined with shackling, tending to lower pH in the mid-longissimus dorsi (ML; P <- 0·10). The 'free' side of the shackled carcass also had significantly lower 40 min pH in the ML, PL and SM locations when compared to PR sides. Genotype had no influence on shackling since there was no treatment by genotype interactions. Despite significant effects on post-mortem metabolism (indicated by the differences in 40 min pH) shackling alone had little influence on overall ultimate meat quality of the carcass. Depending on the sampling location, soluble protein and L (∗) and b (∗) values varied among treatments. Shear force and a (∗) values were similar among treatments, but PR and SL carcasses had significantly lower expressible juice and drip loss compared to SR carcasses. These results suggest that, although shackling alone has little effect on meat quality, in combination with electrical stunning, shackling can lead to a decrease in meat quality.
authors: Red Meat and Beef Production Section, Agriculture Canada Research Station, Bag 5000, Lacombe, Alberta T0C 1S0, Canada.
authors: J L
authors: JL
authors: Aalhus
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Gariepy
authors: A C
authors: AC
authors: Murray
authors: S D
authors: SD
authors: Jones
authors: A K
authors: AK
authors: Tong