title: [Retraction of papers in bioethics: proposal for a paradigmatic case].
abstract: The phenomenon of ethically deficient publication in the field of bioethics is practically unknown. In contrast to the numerous articles and regulations on the ethics of biomedical publications, there is a practical absence of articles devoted to consider the nature, types and prevalence of ethically defective publications in the bioethical literature. No regulatory framework for misbehavior in this field has been proposed until now. Certainly, this is a difficult subject. On one side, it is not easy to draw the ethical limits of the freedoms of thought and expression in bioethics, a discipline that flourishes in the open debate of principles, norms, cases, and imaginary scenarios, where the boundaries between rhetoric and misrepresentation are frequently blurred. After showing some examples of minor violations taken from the literature, the author deals with the moral duty to retract fraudulent bioethical articles, especially when they include deliberate distortions of the data or conclusions from published biomedical research. A detailed analysis of a fraudulent article is made (Haring B. ″New Dimensions of Responsible Parenthood. ″ Theological Studies 37, (1976), 120-132), in which an almost systematic distortion of data and opinions of the cited literature has been made. The article, published in a time of intense and critical protest against the encyclical Humanae vitae, pretends to condemn the methods of natural family planning, the only acceptable means to the Pope, on the allegation that those methods were harmful for the embryo and fetus. According to the author, the retraction of Haring's article is necessary.
authors: Departamento de Humanidades Biomédicas. Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona. gherranz@unav.es
authors: Gonzalo
authors: G
authors: Herranz Rodríguez
mesh_terms: D000022:Abortion, Spontaneous; D001634:Bibliographies as Topic; D001675:Bioethics; D002869:Chromosome Aberrations; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D012252:Natural Family Planning Methods / Q000941:ethics; D011643:Publishing / Q000941:ethics*; D012180:Retraction of Publication as Topic; D015871:Scientific Misconduct; D015053:Zygote