title: The structure of cross-cultural musical diversity.
abstract: Human cultural traits, such as languages, musics, rituals and material objects, vary widely across cultures. However, the majority of comparative analyses of human cultural diversity focus on between-culture variation without consideration for within-culture variation. In contrast, biological approaches to genetic diversity, such as the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) framework, partition genetic diversity into both within- and between-population components. We attempt here for the first time to quantify both components of cultural diversity by applying the AMOVA model to music. By employing this approach with 421 traditional songs from 16 Austronesian-speaking populations, we show that the vast majority of musical variability is due to differences within populations rather than differences between. This demonstrates a striking parallel to the structure of genetic diversity in humans. A neighbour-net analysis of pairwise population musical divergence shows a large amount of reticulation, indicating the pervasive occurrence of borrowing and/or convergent evolution of musical features across populations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. rzeszut@mcmaster.ca
authors.forename: Tom
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Rzeszutek
authors.forename: Patrick E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Savage
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Brown
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D044466:Asian People; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D014644:Genetic Variation; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D009146:Music; D010679:Philippines; D013624:Taiwan
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2299-306
references.pmid: 19324763
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Oct 14;467(7317):801-4
references.pmid: 20944739
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2010 Oct 23;6(5):589-92
references.pmid: 20392717
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb;23(2):254-67
references.pmid: 16221896
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2006 Aug;29(4):329-47; discussion 347-83
references.pmid: 17094820
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Feb;21(2):255-65
references.pmid: 14660700
references.citation: Science. 2009 Jan 23;323(5913):479-83
references.pmid: 19164742
references.citation: Nature. 2003 May 15;423(6937):276-9
references.pmid: 12748639
references.citation: Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479-91
references.pmid: 1644282
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2009 Nov;7(11):e1000241
references.pmid: 19918360
references.citation: Monogr Popul Biol. 1981;16:1-388
references.pmid: 7300842
references.citation: Evol Bioinform Online. 2008 Nov 03;4:271-83
references.pmid: 19204825
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 12;365(1559):3923-33
references.pmid: 21041216
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 22;271(1547):1443-50
references.pmid: 15306315
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 20;106(42):17671-4
references.pmid: 19822753
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 Nov;60(11):2399-402
references.pmid: 17236430
references.citation: Bioessays. 2003 Aug;25(8):798-801
references.pmid: 12879450
references.citation: Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
references.pmid: 19325852
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):1080-9
references.pmid: 21357230
references.citation: Science. 2002 Dec 20;298(5602):2381-5
references.pmid: 12493913
references.citation: Genetics. 1996 Mar;142(3):1061-4
references.pmid: 8849912
references.citation: Science. 1982 Oct 1;218(4567):19-27
references.pmid: 7123211
references.citation: Hum Nat. 2008 Jun;19(2):119-37
references.pmid: 26181460