title: An evaluation of the performance and acceptability of three LED fluorescent microscopes in Zambia: lessons learnt for scale-up.
abstract: The World Health Organization recommends the roll-out of light-emitting diode (LED) fluorescent microscopes (FM) as an alternative to light microscopes in resource-limited settings. We evaluated the acceptability and performance of three LED FMs after a short orientation among laboratory technicians from government health centers in Zambia. Sixteen technicians with varied light microscopy experience were oriented to FMs and divided into groups; each group read a different set of 40 slides on each LED FM (Primo Star iLED™, Lumin™, FluoLED™) and on a reference mercury-vapor FM (Olympus BX41TF). Slide reading times were recorded. An experienced FM technician examined each slide on the Olympus BX41TF. Sensitivity and specificity compared to TB culture were calculated. Misclassification compared to the experienced technician and inter-rater reliability between trainees was assessed. Trainees rated microscopes on technical aspects. Primo Star iLED™, FluoLED™ and Olympus BX41TF had comparable sensitivities (67%, 65% and 65% respectively), with the Lumin™ significantly worse (56%; p<0.05). Specificity was low for trainees on all microscopes (75.9%) compared to the experienced technician on Olympus BX41TF (100%). Primo Star iLED™ had significantly less misclassification (21.1% p<0.05) than FluoLED™ (26.5%) and Lumin™ (26.8%) and significantly higher inter-rater reliability (0.611; p<0.05), compared to FluoLED™ (0.523) and Lumin™ (0.492). Slide reading times for LED FMs were slower than the reference, but not significantly different from each other. Primo Star iLED™ rated highest in acceptability measures, followed by FluoLED™ then Lumin™. Primo Star iLED™ was consistently better than FluoLED™ and Lumin™, and performed comparably to the Olympus BX41TF in all analyses, except reading times. The Lumin™ compared least favorably and was thought unacceptable for use. Specificity and inter-rater reliability were low for all microscopes suggesting that a brief orientation was insufficient in this setting. These results provide important data for resource-limited settings to consider as they scale-up LED FMs.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. eleanor.turnbull@cidrz.org
authors.forename: Eleanor R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Turnbull
authors.forename: Kaunda
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kaunda
authors.forename: Jennifer B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Harris
authors.forename: Nathan
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kapata
authors.forename: Mweemba W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Muvwimi
authors.forename: Annika
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kruuner
authors.forename: German
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Henostroza
authors.forename: Stewart E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Reid
mesh_terms: D008856:Microscopy, Fluorescence / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D013048:Specimen Handling; D015024:Zambia
references.citation: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Jun;102(6):520-1
references.pmid: 18405928
references.citation: AIDS. 2001 Jan 26;15(2):143-52
references.pmid: 11216921
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Dec 28;5(12):e15206
references.pmid: 21203398
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008 Sep;12(9):1009-14
references.pmid: 18713497
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Jul;13(7):836-41
references.pmid: 19555532
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999 Dec;3(12):1101-5
references.pmid: 10599014
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006 Jun;10(6):663-9
references.pmid: 16776454
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 15;183(4):547-51
references.pmid: 20851925
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Aug 04;5(8):e11890
references.pmid: 20694194
references.citation: Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005 Jul;23(3):179-81
references.pmid: 16100425
references.citation: Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;7(4):238-9; author reply 239-40
references.pmid: 17376375
references.citation: Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;7(4):236-7
references.pmid: 17376374
references.citation: Kekkaku. 2009 Sep;84(9):627-9
references.pmid: 19860265
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010 Feb;14(2):160-4
references.pmid: 20074406
references.citation: Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009 Jul;6(4):341-5
references.pmid: 19572787
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Sep;13(9):1130-6
references.pmid: 19723403
references.citation: Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Sep;6(9):570-81
references.pmid: 16931408
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008 Jul;12(7):773-9
references.pmid: 18544203
references.citation: Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 15;47(2):203-7
references.pmid: 18532893
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Feb 18;6(2):e17214
references.pmid: 21364757