title: Evolutionary origins of transcription factor binding site clusters.
abstract: Empirical studies have revealed that regulatory DNA sequences such as enhancers or promoters often harbor multiple binding sites for the same transcription factor. Such "homotypic site clustering" has been hypothesized as arising out of functional requirements of the sequences. Here, we propose an alternative explanation of this phenomenon that multisite enhancers are common because they are favored by evolutionary sampling of the genotype-phenotype landscape. To test this hypothesis, we developed a new computational framework specialized for population genetic simulations of enhancer evolution. It uses a thermodynamics-based model of enhancer function, integrating information from strong as well as weak binding sites, to determine the strength of selection. Using this framework, we found that even when simpler genotypes exist for a desired strength of regulation, relatively complex genotypes (enhancers with more sites) are more readily reached by the simulated evolutionary process. We show that there are more ways to "build" a fit genotype with many weak sites than with a few strong sites, and this is why evolution finds complex genotypes more often. Our claims are consistent with an empirical analysis of binding site content in enhancers characterized in Drosophila melanogaster and their orthologs in other Drosophila species. We also characterized a subtle but significant difference between genotypes likely to be sampled by evolution and equally fit genotypes one would obtain by uniform sampling of the fitness landscape, that is, an "evolutionary signature" in enhancer sequences. Finally, we investigated potential effects of other factors, such as rugged fitness landscapes, short local duplications, and noise characteristics of enhancers, on the emergence of homotypic site clustering. Homotypic site clustering is an important contributor to the complexity and function of cis-regulatory sequences. This work provides a simple null hypothesis for its origin, against which alternative adaptationist explanations may be evaluated, and cautions against "evolutionary mirages" present in common features of genomic sequence. The quantitative framework we develop here can be used more generally to understand how mechanisms of enhancer action influence their composition and evolution.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biochemistry, University of California at San Francisco, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Xin
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: He
authors.forename: Thyago S P C
authors.initials: TS
authors.lastname: Duque
authors.forename: Saurabh
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sinha
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001665:Binding Sites / Q000235:genetics*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004330:Drosophila / Q000235:genetics*; D004742:Enhancer Elements, Genetic / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005838:Genotype; D008957:Models, Genetic; D059645:Mutation Rate; D011156:Population Density; D013045:Species Specificity; D014157:Transcription Factors / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D014157:Transcription Factors
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2000 Jan;16(1):16-23
references.pmid: 10812473
references.citation: Genome Res. 2003 Apr;13(4):579-88
references.pmid: 12670999
references.citation: Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1811-4
references.pmid: 15166317
references.citation: Science. 2007 Sep 14;317(5844):1557-60
references.pmid: 17872446
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106(24):9564-9
references.pmid: 19497876
references.citation: J Cell Biochem. 2005 Apr 1;94(5):890-8
references.pmid: 15696541
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D594-8
references.pmid: 18039705
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 11;16(13):1358-65
references.pmid: 16750631
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9541-6
references.pmid: 15980155
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1995 Jun 9;270(23):13850-9
references.pmid: 7775443
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 26;105(34):12376-81
references.pmid: 18723669
references.citation: Evol Comput. 2002 Spring;10(1):1-34
references.pmid: 11911781
references.citation: Cell Biochem Biophys. 2003;39(1):45-59
references.pmid: 12835528
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1985 Jan 20;181(2):211-30
references.pmid: 3157005
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 15;23(2):134-41
references.pmid: 17098775
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5136-41
references.pmid: 12702751
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Apr;11(4):1935-43
references.pmid: 2005889
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Jun;6(6):451-64
references.pmid: 15883588
references.citation: Dev Biol. 2009 Mar 15;327(2):578-89
references.pmid: 19135437
references.citation: Phys Rev A. 1991 Nov 15;44(10):6399-6413
references.pmid: 9905770
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2007;8(6):R101
references.pmid: 17550599
references.citation: Genetics. 2007 Nov;177(3):1725-31
references.pmid: 17947444
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2010 Jan 22;6(1):e1000829
references.pmid: 20107516
references.citation: Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997 Jun;9(3):350-7
references.pmid: 9159075
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jul 08;6(7):e1000848
references.pmid: 20628617
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 22;99(2):763-8
references.pmid: 11752406
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Sep 16;6(9):
references.pmid: 20862354
references.citation: Science. 1995 Dec 15;270(5243):1825-8
references.pmid: 8525377
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 5;102(14):4960-5
references.pmid: 15793007
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Apr;22(4):874-85
references.pmid: 15659554
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 15;21(8):1747-9
references.pmid: 15572468
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1987 Jul 5;196(1):149-58
references.pmid: 2958636
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2010 Aug 17;8(8):
references.pmid: 20808951
references.citation: Genome Res. 2008 Mar;18(3):477-88
references.pmid: 18256240
references.citation: Genetics. 2006 Mar;172(3):1607-19
references.pmid: 16299396
references.citation: Genome Res. 2010 May;20(5):565-77
references.pmid: 20363979
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(2):382-6
references.pmid: 3124106
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2009 Jan;5(1):e1000330
references.pmid: 19132088
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Jan 8;457(7226):215-8
references.pmid: 19029883
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 31;103(44):16337-42
references.pmid: 17060629
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2010 Jul 29;6(7):e1001042
references.pmid: 20686658
references.citation: Nature. 1990 May 24;345(6273):359-61
references.pmid: 2188137
references.citation: Genetics. 1998 Apr;148(4):1667-86
references.pmid: 9560386
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104 Suppl 1:8597-604
references.pmid: 17494740
references.citation: Development. 1998 Mar;125(5):949-58
references.pmid: 9449677
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 22;99(2):757-62
references.pmid: 11805330
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Dec 01;4(12):e8155
references.pmid: 19956545
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2010 Mar 9;20(5):R249-54
references.pmid: 20219179
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Jan 31;451(7178):535-40
references.pmid: 18172436
references.citation: Nat Commun. 2010 Oct 19;1:99
references.pmid: 20981027
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Feb 03;7(2):e1001069
references.pmid: 21304932