title: Frameshift mutagenesis: the roles of primer-template misalignment and the nonhomologous end-joining pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
abstract: Small insertions or deletions that alter the reading frame of a gene typically occur in simple repeats such as mononucleotide runs and are thought to reflect spontaneous primer-template misalignment during DNA replication. The resulting extrahelical repeat is efficiently recognized by the mismatch repair machinery, which specifically replaces the newly replicated strand to restore the original sequence. Frameshift mutagenesis is most easily studied using reversion assays, and previous studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggested that the length threshold for polymerase slippage in mononucleotide runs is 4N. Because the probability of slippage is strongly correlated with run length, however, it was not clear whether shorter runs were unable to support slippage or whether the resulting frameshifts were obscured by the presence of longer runs. To address this issue, we removed all mononucleotide runs >3N from the yeast lys2ΔBgl and lys2ΔA746 frameshift reversion assays, which detect net 1-bp deletions and insertions, respectively. Analyses demonstrate that 2N and 3N runs can support primer-template misalignment, but there is striking run-specific variation in the frequency of slippage, in the accumulation of +1 vs. -1 frameshifts and in the apparent efficiency of mismatch repair. We suggest that some of this variation reflects the role of flanking sequence in initiating primer-template misalignment and that some reflects replication-independent frameshifts generated by the nonhomologous end-joining pathway. Finally, we demonstrate that nonhomologous end joining is uniquely required for the de novo creation of tandem duplications from noniterated sequence.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
authors.forename: Kevin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lehner
authors.forename: Sarah V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: Mudrak
authors.forename: Brenda K
authors.initials: BK
authors.lastname: Minesinger
authors.forename: Sue
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Jinks-Robertson
mesh_terms: D000483:Alleles; D020137:Base Pair Mismatch; D001483:Base Sequence; D059766:DNA End-Joining Repair; D053843:DNA Mismatch Repair; D004261:DNA Replication; D016368:Frameshift Mutation; D020440:Gene Duplication; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D016296:Mutagenesis; D011995:Recombination, Genetic; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000235:genetics*
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 1997 May;17(5):2844-50
references.pmid: 9111356
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 1997 May;17(5):2859-65
references.pmid: 9111358
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Mar 15;30(6):e23
references.pmid: 11884642
references.citation: Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966;31:77-84
references.pmid: 5237214
references.citation: Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):9-21
references.pmid: 1398066
references.citation: DNA Repair (Amst). 2007 Sep 1;6(9):1307-18
references.pmid: 17442629
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 24;272(4):2559-69
references.pmid: 8999973
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2010 Mar 26;37(6):843-53
references.pmid: 20347426
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1990 Sep 4;29(35):8003-11
references.pmid: 1702019
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 2006 Apr;31(4):206-14
references.pmid: 16545956
references.citation: Genet Res. 2000 Dec;76(3):227-36
references.pmid: 11204970
references.citation: Math Biosci. 2005 Aug;196(2):198-214
references.pmid: 15950991
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 7;106(14):5749-54
references.pmid: 19307574
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Feb;39(3):970-8
references.pmid: 20935051
references.citation: Science. 1996 Jun 14;272(5268):1646-9
references.pmid: 8658138
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 1996 May;16(5):2164-73
references.pmid: 8628283
references.citation: Annu Rev Genet. 2005;39:431-51
references.pmid: 16285867
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002 Dec;66(4):630-70, table of contents
references.pmid: 12456786
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Jul;19(7):4766-73
references.pmid: 10373526
references.citation: Yeast. 1998 Jul;14(10):953-61
references.pmid: 9717241
references.citation: EMBO J. 1997 Aug 1;16(15):4788-95
references.pmid: 9303323
references.citation: Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:681-710
references.pmid: 15952900
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2000 Feb 10;10(3):145-8
references.pmid: 10679328
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jul;87(13):4946-50
references.pmid: 2195542
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1999 Mar;48(3):313-6
references.pmid: 10093220
references.citation: Genetics. 2001 Sep;159(1):65-75
references.pmid: 11560887
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281-301
references.pmid: 2005793
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 2;107(9):4057-62
references.pmid: 20160111
references.citation: Genes Dev. 1996 Feb 15;10(4):407-20
references.pmid: 8600025
references.citation: EMBO J. 2003 May 1;22(9):2274-83
references.pmid: 12727893
references.citation: Genome Biol Evol. 2010 Jul 12;2:325-35
references.pmid: 20624737
references.citation: Cancer Res. 2010 Jan 15;70(2):431-5
references.pmid: 20068152