title: Signalling plasticity and energy saving in a tropical bushcricket.
abstract: Males of the tropical bushcricket Mecopoda elongata synchronize their acoustic advertisement signals (chirps) in interactions with other males. However, synchrony is not perfect and distinct leader and follower roles are often maintained. In entrainment experiments in which conspecific signals were presented at various rates, chirps displayed as follower showed notable signal plasticity. Follower chirps were shortened by reducing the number and duration of syllables, especially those of low and medium amplitude. The degree of shortening depended on the time delay between leader and follower signals and the sound level of the entraining stimulus. The same signal plasticity was evident in male duets, with the effect that the last syllables of highest amplitude overlapped more strongly. Respiratory measurements showed that solo singing males producing higher chirp rates suffered from higher metabolic costs compared to males singing at lower rates. In contrast, respiratory rate was rather constant during a synchronous entrainment to a conspecific signal repeated at various rates. This allowed males to maintain a steady duty cycle, associated with a constant metabolic rate. Results are discussed with respect to the preference for leader signals in females and the possible benefits males may gain by overlapping their follower signals in a chorus.
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology, Karl-Franzens Universität Graz, Graz, Austria. manfred.hartbauer@uni-graz.at
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hartbauer
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Stabentheiner
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Römer
mesh_terms: D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D006135:Gryllidae / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male
references.citation: Science. 1969 Nov 14;166(3907):891-4
references.pmid: 17815755
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 2007 Dec;53(12):1250-61
references.pmid: 17707395
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Jan 29;5(1):e8967
references.pmid: 20126462
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Nov;56(5):1091-1098
references.pmid: 9819323
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 2010 Dec;56(12):1834-45
references.pmid: 20705071
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2005 Apr;208(Pt 8):1495-512
references.pmid: 15802674
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Feb;191(2):175-88
references.pmid: 15614532
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 1999 Feb;45(2):183-190
references.pmid: 12770387
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Apr;55(4):905-13
references.pmid: 9632477
references.citation: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2008;63(2):195-208
references.pmid: 19789730
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 1977;23(8):993-1008
references.pmid: 20187306
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 2006 Mar;52(3):221-30
references.pmid: 16289569
references.citation: Science. 1990 Jul 6;249(4964):55-8
references.pmid: 17787627
references.citation: Science. 2010 Jul 9;329(5988):181
references.pmid: 20616271
references.citation: Evolution. 1998 Feb;52(1):166-171
references.pmid: 28568142
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 Jan;204(Pt 1):69-80
references.pmid: 11104712
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2007 Feb;210(Pt 3):465-76
references.pmid: 17234616
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2005 Apr;208(Pt 7):1219-37
references.pmid: 15781883
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1999 Jan;57(1):89-95
references.pmid: 10053075
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 1986;29(3-4):196-206
references.pmid: 3594203
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009 Jan;195(1):31-7
references.pmid: 18982278
references.citation: Sci Prog. 1975 Summer;62(246):263-83
references.pmid: 810885
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 14;106(15):6357-62
references.pmid: 19332794
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205-14
references.pmid: 1195756