title: Comparison of Learning Curves and Clinical Outcomes between Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Open Distal Gastrectomy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Most stomach surgeons have been educated sufficiently in conventional open distal gastrectomy (ODG) but insufficiently in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). We compared learning curves and clinical outcomes between ODG and LADG by a single surgeon who had sufficient education of ODG and insufficient education of LADG.
  
  
  METHODS
  ODG (90 patients, January through September, 2004) and LADG groups (90 patients, June 2006 to June 2007) were compared. The learning curve was assessed with the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes, operation time, and postoperative morbidity/mortality.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean operation time was 168.3 minutes for ODG and 183.6 minutes for LADG. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 37.9. Up to about the 20th to 25th cases, the slope decrease in the learning curve for LADG was more apparent than for ODG, although they both reached plateaus after the 50th cases. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes reached the overall mean after the 30th and 40th cases for ODG and LADG, respectively. For ODG, complications were evenly distributed throughout the subgroups, whereas for LADG, complications occurred in 10 (33.3%) of the first 30 cases.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compared with conventional ODG, LADG is feasible, in particular for a surgeon who has had much experience with conventional ODG, although LADG required more operative time, slightly more time to get adequately retrieved lymph nodes and more complications. However, there were more minor problems in the first 30 LADG than ODG cases. The unfavorable results for LADG can be overcome easily through an adequate training program for LADG.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.
authors.forename: Sang Yull
authors.initials: SY
authors.lastname: Kang
authors.forename: Se Youl
authors.initials: SY
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Chan Young
authors.initials: CY
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Doo Hyun
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Yang
references.citation: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2001 Jul;10(4):215-9
references.pmid: 16754017
references.citation: Surgery. 2002 Jan;131(1 Suppl):S306-11
references.pmid: 11821829
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2007 Jan;21(1):28-33
references.pmid: 16960676
references.citation: World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec 21;11(47):7508-11
references.pmid: 16437724
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Oct;46(10):1371-8; discussion 1378-9
references.pmid: 14530677
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2000 Jul;135(7):806-10
references.pmid: 10896374
references.citation: World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan 21;12(3):354-62
references.pmid: 16489633
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2005 Apr;189(4):469-73
references.pmid: 15820464
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 1997 Jun;11(6):650-2
references.pmid: 9171126
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2250-7
references.pmid: 19172352
references.citation: Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2007 Jan;16(1):101-14
references.pmid: 17336239
references.citation: Dig Dis. 2005;23(2):113-8
references.pmid: 16352890