title: Automated time activity classification based on global positioning system (GPS) tracking data.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Air pollution epidemiological studies are increasingly using global positioning system (GPS) to collect time-location data because they offer continuous tracking, high temporal resolution, and minimum reporting burden for participants. However, substantial uncertainties in the processing and classifying of raw GPS data create challenges for reliably characterizing time activity patterns. We developed and evaluated models to classify people's major time activity patterns from continuous GPS tracking data.
  
  
  METHODS
  We developed and evaluated two automated models to classify major time activity patterns (i.e., indoor, outdoor static, outdoor walking, and in-vehicle travel) based on GPS time activity data collected under free living conditions for 47 participants (N = 131 person-days) from the Harbor Communities Time Location Study (HCTLS) in 2008 and supplemental GPS data collected from three UC-Irvine research staff (N = 21 person-days) in 2010. Time activity patterns used for model development were manually classified by research staff using information from participant GPS recordings, activity logs, and follow-up interviews. We evaluated two models: (a) a rule-based model that developed user-defined rules based on time, speed, and spatial location, and (b) a random forest decision tree model.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Indoor, outdoor static, outdoor walking and in-vehicle travel activities accounted for 82.7%, 6.1%, 3.2% and 7.2% of manually-classified time activities in the HCTLS dataset, respectively. The rule-based model classified indoor and in-vehicle travel periods reasonably well (Indoor: sensitivity > 91%, specificity > 80%, and precision > 96%; in-vehicle travel: sensitivity > 71%, specificity > 99%, and precision > 88%), but the performance was moderate for outdoor static and outdoor walking predictions. No striking differences in performance were observed between the rule-based and the random forest models. The random forest model was fast and easy to execute, but was likely less robust than the rule-based model under the condition of biased or poor quality training data.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our models can successfully identify indoor and in-vehicle travel points from the raw GPS data, but challenges remain in developing models to distinguish outdoor static points and walking. Accurate training data are essential in developing reliable models in classifying time-activity patterns.
authors.affiliation: Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, USA. junwu@uci.edu
authors.forename: Jun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: Chengsheng
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Jiang
authors.forename: Douglas
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Houston
authors.forename: Dean
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Baker
authors.forename: Ralph
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Delfino
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living / Q000145:classification*; D000465:Algorithms; D001185:Artificial Intelligence; D002140:California; D002947:Cities; D002965:Classification / Q000379:methods*; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D003663:Decision Trees; D040362:Geographic Information Systems / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D015141:Los Angeles; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009043:Motor Activity; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 08;9:453
references.pmid: 19995424
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Feb;41(2):472-8
references.pmid: 19151593
references.citation: Rev Environ Health. 2008 Oct-Dec;23(4):243-97
references.pmid: 19235364
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Feb;43(2):365-72
references.pmid: 20581721
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 2006;411:422-32
references.pmid: 16939804
references.citation: J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1991 Apr;1(2):157-92
references.pmid: 1824315
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Nov;33(11):1919-24
references.pmid: 11689744
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):178-83
references.pmid: 20117574
references.citation: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;17(2):196-206
references.pmid: 16773123
references.citation: J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Sep;12(5):583-5
references.pmid: 19036637
references.citation: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Jul 29;11:51
references.pmid: 21801360
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2007 Jul;33(1):51-3
references.pmid: 17572312
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Apr 1;41(7):2138-45
references.pmid: 17438754
references.citation: Reprod Sci. 2008 Sep;15(7):631-50
references.pmid: 18836129
references.citation: J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2001 May-Jun;11(3):231-52
references.pmid: 11477521
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(5):668-76
references.pmid: 19963310
references.citation: Toxicol Lett. 2004 Apr 1;149(1-3):235-42
references.pmid: 15093269
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 1;43(13):4737-43
references.pmid: 19673259
references.citation: Environ Health Insights. 2010 Nov 23;4:93-108
references.pmid: 21151593
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jan;111(1):115-22
references.pmid: 12515689
references.citation: Environ Int. 2011 May;37(4):766-77
references.pmid: 21419493
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Aug;108 Suppl 4:625-33
references.pmid: 10940240
references.citation: J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2001 May-Jun;11(3):207-15
references.pmid: 11477518
references.citation: Occup Environ Med. 2008 Sep;65(9):579-86
references.pmid: 18070798
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Oct;39(10):1851-7
references.pmid: 17909415
references.citation: J Environ Monit. 2009 Jul;11(7):1331-9
references.pmid: 20449221
references.citation: Rev Environ Health. 2007 Apr-Jun;22(2):115-37
references.pmid: 17894203
references.citation: Int J Health Geogr. 2008 Nov 25;7:59
references.pmid: 19032783
references.citation: Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2005 Nov;(130 Pt 1):1-107; discussion 109-27
references.pmid: 16454009
references.citation: Environ Int. 2008 Jan;34(1):12-22
references.pmid: 17688949