title: Differences among major taxa in the extent of ecological knowledge across four major ecosystems.
abstract: Existing knowledge shapes our understanding of ecosystems and is critical for ecosystem-based management of the world's natural resources. Typically this knowledge is biased among taxa, with some taxa far better studied than others, but the extent of this bias is poorly known. In conjunction with the publically available World Registry of Marine Species database (WoRMS) and one of the world's premier electronic scientific literature databases (Web of Science®), a text mining approach is used to examine the distribution of existing ecological knowledge among taxa in coral reef, mangrove, seagrass and kelp bed ecosystems. We found that for each of these ecosystems, most research has been limited to a few groups of organisms. While this bias clearly reflects the perceived importance of some taxa as commercially or ecologically valuable, the relative lack of research of other taxonomic groups highlights the problem that some key taxa and associated ecosystem processes they affect may be poorly understood or completely ignored. The approach outlined here could be applied to any type of ecosystem for analyzing previous research effort and identifying knowledge gaps in order to improve ecosystem-based conservation and management.
authors.affiliation: Australian Institute of Marine Science, UWA Oceans Institute, Crawley, Australia. r.fisher@aims.gov.au
authors.forename: Rebecca
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Fisher
authors.forename: Nancy
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Knowlton
authors.forename: Russell E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Brainard
authors.forename: M Julian
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Caley
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D017753:Ecosystem; D008386:Marine Biology; D010944:Plants / Q000145:classification*
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jul 29;345(1311):75-9
references.pmid: 7972358
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Jul 20;442(7100):245-6
references.pmid: 16855567
references.citation: Biometrics. 1987 Dec;43(4):783-91
references.pmid: 3427163
references.citation: Science. 1994 Sep 9;265(5178):1547-51
references.pmid: 17801530
references.citation: Science. 1989 Jul 14;245(4914):170-3
references.pmid: 17787876
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20141
references.pmid: 21695119
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2021 Oct 11;31(19):R1174-R1177
references.pmid: 34637726
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Jul;20(7):380-6
references.pmid: 16701400
references.citation: Adv Mar Biol. 2006;50:57-189
references.pmid: 16782451
references.citation: Science. 2008 Feb 15;319(5865):948-52
references.pmid: 18276889
references.citation: Science. 1991 Aug 16;253(5021):758-62
references.pmid: 17835492
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1584-93
references.pmid: 18173482
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jan 22;275(1631):149-55
references.pmid: 17999950
references.citation: Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):955-8
references.pmid: 12920296
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 30;103(22):8425-9
references.pmid: 16709673