title: Eclecticism as the foundation of meta-theoretical, mixed methods and interdisciplinary research in social sciences.
abstract: This article examines the value of "eclecticism" as the foundation of meta-theoretical, mixed methods and interdisciplinary research in social sciences. On the basis of the analysis of the historical background of the concept, it is first suggested that eclecticism-based theoretical scholarship in social sciences could benefit from the more systematic research method that has been developed for synthesizing theoretical works under the name metatheorizing. Second, it is suggested that the mixed methods community could base its research approach on philosophical eclecticism instead of pragmatism because the basic idea of eclecticism is much more in sync with the nature of the combined research tradition. Finally, the Kuhnian frame is used to support the argument for interdisciplinary research and, hence, eclecticism in social sciences (rather than making an argument against multiple paradigms). More particularly, it is suggested that integrating the different (inter)disciplinary traditions and schools into one is not necessarily desirable at all in social sciences because of the complexity and openness of the research field. If it is nevertheless attempted, experience in economics suggests that paradigmatic unification comes at a high price.
authors.affiliation: Department of Economics, Estonian Business School, A. Lauteri 3, Tallinn, 10114, Estonia. karmo.kroos@ebs.ee
authors.forename: Karmo
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kroos
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D019359:Knowledge; D010684:Philosophy; D012107:Research Design; D012942:Social Sciences / Q000379:methods*; D013598:Systems Theory
references.citation: Analyst. 2004 Oct;129(10):865
references.pmid: 15457312
references.citation: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Mar;46(1):1-19
references.pmid: 21695392