title: Revisiting backward recall and benchmark memory effects: a reply to Bireta et al. (2010).
abstract: When participants are asked to recall lists of items in the reverse order, known as backward recall, several benchmark memory phenomena, such as the word length effect, are abolished (Bireta et al. Memory & Cognition 38:279-291, 2010). Bireta et al. (Memory & Cognition 38:279-291, 2010) suggested that in backward recall, reliance on order retention is increased at the expense of item retention, leading to the abolition of item-based phenomena. In a subsequent study, however, Guérard and Saint-Aubin (in press) showed that four lexical factors known to modulate item retention were unaffected by recall direction. In a series of five experiments, we examined the source of the discrepancy between the two studies. We revisited the effects of phonological similarity, word length, articulatory suppression, and irrelevant speech, using open and closed pools of words in backward and forward recall. The results are unequivocal in showing that none of these effects are influenced by recall direction, suggesting that Bireta et al.'s (Memory & Cognition 38:279-291, 2010) results are the consequence of their particular stimuli.
authors.affiliation: École de Psychologie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick E1A 3E9, Canada. katherine.guerard@umoncton.ca
authors.forename: Katherine
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Guérard
authors.forename: Jean
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Saint-Aubin
authors.forename: Samantha C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Burns
authors.forename: Cindy
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Chamberland
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking; D006801:Humans; D008570:Memory, Short-Term
references.citation: Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1997;12(1):29-40
references.pmid: 14588432
references.citation: Memory. 2000 Mar;8(2):71-8
references.pmid: 10829124
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):112-20
references.pmid: 24214812
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):338-53
references.pmid: 21171805
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):434-8
references.pmid: 17048727
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Sep;22(5):1154-65
references.pmid: 8805820
references.citation: Memory. 2009 Nov;17(8):874-91
references.pmid: 19882438
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):312-24
references.pmid: 21928932
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Mar;16(2):258-69
references.pmid: 2137865
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 2011 Spring;124(1):75-86
references.pmid: 21506452
references.citation: Scand J Psychol. 1992 Sep;33(3):212-29
references.pmid: 1488646
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Sep;23(5):1217-32
references.pmid: 9293631
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 2008 Sep;62(3):141-9
references.pmid: 18778142
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2010 Apr;38(3):279-91
references.pmid: 20234018
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):539-76
references.pmid: 17638496
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2005 Sep;33(6):1001-16
references.pmid: 16496721
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995 May;48(2):384-404
references.pmid: 7610273
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):171-7
references.pmid: 15945210
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):850-65
references.pmid: 19679864