title: Direct comparison of nanoindentation and macroscopic measurements of bone viscoelasticity.
abstract: Nanoindentation has become a standard method for measuring mechanical properties of bone, especially within microstructural units such as individual osteons or trabeculae. The use of nanoindentation to measure elastic properties has been thoroughly studied and validated. However, it is also possible to assess time dependent properties of bone by nanoindentation. The goal of this study was to compare time dependent mechanical properties of bone measured at the macroscopic level with those measured by nanoindentation. Twelve samples were prepared from the posterior distal femoral cortex of young cows. Initially, dogbone samples were prepared and subjected to torsional stress relaxation in a saline bath at 37 °C. A 5 mm thick disk was subsequently sectioned from the gage length, and subjected to nanoindentation. Nanoindentation was performed on hydrated samples using a standard protocol with 20 indents performed in 20 different osteons in each sample. Creep and stress relaxation data were fit to a Burgers four parameter rheological model, a five parameter generalized Maxwell model, and a three parameter standard linear solid. For Burgers viscoelastic model, the time constants measured by nanoindentation and torsion were weakly negatively correlated, while for the other two models the time constants were uncorrelated. The results support the notion that the viscoelastic behavior of bone at the macroscopic scale is primarily due to microstructural features, interfaces, or fluid flow, rather than viscous behavior of the bone tissue. As viscoelasticity affects the fatigue behavior of materials, the microscale properties may provide a measure of bone quality associated with initial damage formation.
authors.affiliation: Tissue Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
authors.forename: Tara N
authors.initials: TN
authors.lastname: Shepherd
authors.forename: Jingzhou
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Timothy C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Ovaert
authors.forename: Ryan K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Roeder
authors.forename: Glen L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Niebur
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002417:Cattle; D004548:Elasticity; D006245:Hardness Tests / Q000379:methods*; D036103:Nanotechnology / Q000379:methods*; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013977:Tibia; D013997:Time Factors; D014783:Viscosity
references.citation: J Biomech. 2008;41(2):267-75
references.pmid: 17961578
references.citation: Eur J Morphol. 2005 Feb-Apr;42(1-2):31-41
references.pmid: 16123022
references.citation: J Biomech. 1995 Jul;28(7):809-15
references.pmid: 7657679
references.citation: J Biomech. 2010 Aug 26;43(12):2410-7
references.pmid: 20478559
references.citation: J Biomech. 1976;9(7):459-64
references.pmid: 939768
references.citation: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2010 Feb;3(2):189-202
references.pmid: 20129418
references.citation: J Biomech. 1993 Dec;26(12):1369-76
references.pmid: 8308042
references.citation: Bone. 1999 Sep;25(3):295-300
references.pmid: 10495133
references.citation: Biomaterials. 1997 Oct;18(20):1325-30
references.pmid: 9363331
references.citation: Bone. 2010 Dec;47(6):1030-8
references.pmid: 20813215
references.citation: Calcif Tissue Int. 2006 Jun;78(6):392-7
references.pmid: 16830198
references.citation: J Biomech Eng. 2005 Dec;127(7):1046-53
references.pmid: 16502646
references.citation: J Biomech. 1997 Sep;30(9):891-4
references.pmid: 9302611
references.citation: J Biomech. 1979;12(9):679-87
references.pmid: 489635
references.citation: J Biomech. 1979;12(9):657-78
references.pmid: 489634
references.citation: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009 Oct;2(5):460-70
references.pmid: 19627852
references.citation: J Biomech. 2011 Apr 7;44(6):1066-72
references.pmid: 21353675
references.citation: J Biomech. 1993 Jan;26(1):77-83
references.pmid: 8423171
references.citation: J Biomech. 2003 Oct;36(10):1503-9
references.pmid: 14499299
references.citation: J Biomed Mater Res. 1999 Apr;45(1):48-54
references.pmid: 10397957
references.citation: J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Apr;18(4):623-8
references.pmid: 17546423
references.citation: Bone. 2002 Jan;30(1):178-84
references.pmid: 11792582
references.citation: J Biomech. 1999 Oct;32(10):1005-12
references.pmid: 10476838
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 May;204(Pt 10):1775-81
references.pmid: 11316498
references.citation: J Struct Biol. 2005 Feb;149(2):138-48
references.pmid: 15681230
references.citation: J Biomech. 1999 Apr;32(4):437-41
references.pmid: 10213035
references.citation: J Biomech. 1979;12(9):689-98
references.pmid: 489636
references.citation: J Biomech. 1984;17(5):349-61
references.pmid: 6736070