title: Effects of auditory recognition learning on the perception of vocal features in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).
abstract: Learning to recognize complex sensory signals can change the way they are perceived. European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) recognize other starlings by their song, which consists of a series of complex, stereotyped motifs. Song recognition learning is accompanied by plasticity in secondary auditory areas, suggesting that perceptual learning is involved. Here, to investigate whether perceptual learning can be observed behaviorally, a same-different operant task was used to measure how starlings perceived small differences in motif structure. Birds trained to recognize conspecific songs were better at detecting variations in motifs from the songs they learned, even though this variation was not directly necessary to learn the associative task. Discrimination also improved as the reference stimulus was repeated multiple times. Perception of the much larger differences between different motifs was unaffected by training. These results indicate that sensory representations of motifs are enhanced when starlings learn to recognize songs.
authors.affiliation: Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60622, USA. dmeliza@uchicago.edu
authors.forename: C Daniel
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Meliza
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning; D001306:Auditory Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D001307:Auditory Perception; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D046709:Pattern Recognition, Physiological; D011571:Psychoacoustics; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D046749:Starlings / Q000502:physiology*; D014828:Vocalization, Animal
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Jun;123(2):178-200
references.pmid: 8014612
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1985;59(3):587-99
references.pmid: 2993015
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:585-612
references.pmid: 9496632
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1350-9
references.pmid: 18681620
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Jun 24;4(6):e5974
references.pmid: 19551146
references.citation: Nature. 1997 May 22;387(6631):401-6
references.pmid: 9163425
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Apr;83(4):1690-3
references.pmid: 3372876
references.citation: Science. 2008 Sep 12;321(5895):1502-7
references.pmid: 18787171
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Sep;76(3):722-31
references.pmid: 6491044
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2006 Aug;120(3):239-51
references.pmid: 16893261
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1446-8
references.pmid: 17028582
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Jan;78(1):27-43
references.pmid: 11062321
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Oct 25;413(6858):844-8
references.pmid: 11677607
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):443-458
references.pmid: 10675267
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Aug 7;424(6949):669-74
references.pmid: 12904792
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):579-594
references.pmid: 9784206
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 May;121(5 Pt1):2842-51
references.pmid: 17550183
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 12;364(1515):285-99
references.pmid: 18986968
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;103(4):1785-97
references.pmid: 20107117
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Mar;103(3):1195-208
references.pmid: 20032245
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1949 Dec;39(6):770-84
references.pmid: 15398590
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jun;107(6):3369-81
references.pmid: 10875382
references.citation: Hear Res. 2007 Jul;229(1-2):54-68
references.pmid: 17344002
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Nov;106(5):2900-12
references.pmid: 10573904