title: Short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a less invasive method to treat acute cholecystitis in patients who are critically ill or have serious medical comorbidities precluding the use of general anesthesia. It remains controversial whether interval cholecystectomy is warranted. The objectives of the study were to determine the success rate and complications of percutaneous cholecystostomy and the proportion of patients without recurrent attacks in whom interval cholecystectomy was not needed.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a retrospective review to determine the outcomes after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute calculous cholecystitis between 1995 and 2007. Administrative data were used to better capture recurrent symptoms requiring treatment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sixty-eight patients with a mean age of 74 years were identified. Sixty-seven (98.5%) underwent successful insertion of the cholecystostomy tubes. Eleven patients suffered tube-related complications, including tube dislodgment (9), tube blockage (1), and bleeding that was controlled with conservative management (1). The initial episode of cholecystitis was treated successfully in 58 patients (85%). The overall in-hospital and 30-day mortality were both 15% (10 patients). A total of 7 patients (10%) underwent cholecystectomy while still in hospital. There were 39 patients at risk for recurrent disease who survived the initial episode and did not receive an interval cholecystectomy. Of these 39 patients, 16 (41%) suffered recurrent gallbladder-related disease.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an alternative to cholecystectomy in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis who are at high risk for surgical mortality and morbidity. It appears to have a low complication rate and good clinical success. Because a significant number of patients suffer recurrent attacks, elective cholecystectomy should be considered routinely. Unfortunately, firm criteria for selecting percutaneous cholecystostomy over cholecystectomy are lacking, and the surgeon's clinical judgment is critically important.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, GF-431, 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada. amckay3@exchange.hsc.mb.ca
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: McKay
authors.forename: Moaz
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Abulfaraj
authors.forename: Jeremy
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lipschitz
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D041881:Cholecystitis, Acute / Q000601:surgery*; D002767:Cholecystostomy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D042882:Gallstones / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(5):593-6
references.pmid: 18415753
references.citation: Am Surg. 2000 Jan;66(1):33-7
references.pmid: 10651344
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1256-9
references.pmid: 16132331
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1999 Dec;86(12):1521-5
references.pmid: 10594498
references.citation: World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov 28;12(44):7179-82
references.pmid: 17131483
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1994 Jan;81(1):116-9
references.pmid: 8313084
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2000 Nov;14(11):1067-9
references.pmid: 11116421
references.citation: J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
references.pmid: 3558716
references.citation: Radiology. 1992 Apr;183(1):167-70
references.pmid: 1549666
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Aug;197(2):206-11
references.pmid: 12892798
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
references.pmid: 15273542
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2002 Jan;183(1):62-6
references.pmid: 11869705
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2000 Sep;180(3):198-202
references.pmid: 11084129
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1978 Oct;113(10):1149-52
references.pmid: 708235
references.citation: Int Surg. 1998 Oct-Dec;83(4):299-302
references.pmid: 10096746
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1985 Mar;72(3):220-2
references.pmid: 3978383
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Oct;85(10):1363-9
references.pmid: 2220730
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 May;168(5):1247-51
references.pmid: 9129421
references.citation: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001 Apr;386(3):212-7
references.pmid: 11382324
references.citation: World J Surg. 1998 May;22(5):459-63
references.pmid: 9564288
references.citation: HPB (Oxford). 2009 May;11(3):183-93
references.pmid: 19590646
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2002 Jul;12(7):1778-84
references.pmid: 12111069
references.citation: South Med J. 2008 Jun;101(6):586-90
references.pmid: 18475218
references.citation: ANZ J Surg. 2010 Apr;80(4):280-3
references.pmid: 20575957
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):334-9
references.pmid: 18716529
references.citation: Am Surg. 2010 Jul;76(7):708-12
references.pmid: 20698375
references.citation: Health Econ. 1997 Sep-Oct;6(5):505-10
references.pmid: 9353651
references.citation: Hong Kong Med J. 2004 Dec;10(6):389-93
references.pmid: 15591597
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1989 Jul;124(7):782-5; discussion 785-6
references.pmid: 2742479
references.citation: Nihon Geka Hokan. 1997 Mar 1;66(1):3-13
references.pmid: 9642986
references.citation: Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1993;82(4):241-4
references.pmid: 8122871
references.citation: Dig Surg. 2010;27(5):417-21
references.pmid: 20948216
references.citation: South Med J. 2008 Jun;101(6):577
references.pmid: 18475222
references.citation: J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008 Sep;17(3):309-13
references.pmid: 18836625
references.citation: Surgery. 1997 Apr;121(4):398-401
references.pmid: 9122869
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1995 Sep;82(9):1274-7
references.pmid: 7552017