title: Bone mineral density changes in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Osteoporosis and related fragility fractures are one of the most common complications seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and dramatically affect quality of life.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate changes in bone mineral density in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (<1 year) and its correlation if any with a modified DAS-28 score and simple erosion narrowing score (SENS).
  
  
  METHODS
  This study included 30 patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis fulfilling the new American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and 20 healthy volunteers as controls. All were subjected to a complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, liver function tests, renal function tests, rheumatoid factor, and plain x-rays of the hands and feet. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry DEXA was used to measure bone mineral density (BMD) of the left proximal femur, lumbar spine (L1-L4), and lower distal radius at the time of recruitment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the RA patients, 13.3% had osteoporosis, 50% had osteopenia, and 36.7% had normal BMD. The most common site of osteoporosis was the lumbar spine (four patients, 13.3%) followed by the femur (two patients, 6.6%), and forearm (only one patient, 3.3%). There was a significantly higher percentage of osteoporosis among RA males than females and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.009). Osteoporosis was more common in patients treated with corticosteroids and disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) than in patients treated with only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (P = 0.004). Higher disease activity (DAS-28) was found in RA patients with osteoporosis compared to RA patients with normal BMD or osteopenia, but the difference was not statistically significant. Osteoporotic RA patients were found to have a higher SENS score for radiological damage than nonosteoporotic ones.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  BMD changes do occur in patients with early RA, and are not necessarily correlated with disease activity (DAS-28). However, a significant negative correlation was found between BMD and the score of radiological damage (SENS). Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry is an important investigation to assess BMD in early RA patients.
authors.affiliation: Departments of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology.
authors.forename: Eman A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Hafez
authors.forename: Howaida E
authors.initials: HE
authors.lastname: Mansour
authors.forename: Sherin H
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Hamza
authors.forename: Sherine George
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Moftah
authors.forename: Takwa Badr
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Younes
authors.forename: Mona Ahmed
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Ismail
references.citation: Rheumatol Int. 2009 Jun;29(8):897-905
references.pmid: 19104820
references.citation: Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(4):R154
references.pmid: 20682035
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Nov;66(11):1508-12
references.pmid: 17456523
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Mar;68(3):373-6
references.pmid: 18408246
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan;38(1):44-8
references.pmid: 7818570
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2000 Nov;27(11):2582-9
references.pmid: 11093437
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Apr;48(4):342-6
references.pmid: 19151030
references.citation: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jan 29;9:13
references.pmid: 18230132
references.citation: Yonsei Med J. 2008 Jun 30;49(3):436-42
references.pmid: 18581594
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2007 Oct;34(10):1971-5
references.pmid: 17896806
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Feb;92(2):497-503
references.pmid: 17077132
references.citation: Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(5):R106
references.pmid: 18771585
references.citation: Korean J Intern Med. 2010 Dec;25(4):436-46
references.pmid: 21179283
references.citation: J Clin Densitom. 2009 Oct-Dec;12(4):434-40
references.pmid: 19775920
references.citation: J Clin Densitom. 2004 Spring;7(1):1-6
references.pmid: 14742881
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 1999 Mar;26(3):743-5
references.pmid: 10090194
references.citation: Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1997 Jul-Sep;64(7-9):451-8
references.pmid: 9338926
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Dec;63(12):1576-80
references.pmid: 15547081
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Aug;62(8):2219-26
references.pmid: 20506234
references.citation: Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S100-8
references.pmid: 16273793
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Oct 15;61(10):1379-86
references.pmid: 19790118
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Jan;29(1):1-9
references.pmid: 3947405
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315-24
references.pmid: 3358796
references.citation: Yonsei Med J. 2011 Jan;52(1):113-20
references.pmid: 21155043
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jun;60(6):1624-31
references.pmid: 19479876
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Sep;67(9):1267-70
references.pmid: 18203764
references.citation: Joint Bone Spine. 2003 Jun;70(3):195-202
references.pmid: 12814762
references.citation: Pharmacology. 2009;83(1):1-9
references.pmid: 18957873
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2569-81
references.pmid: 20872595