title: Evaluation of clinical outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery in clinical practice: still a controversial issue.
abstract: Background. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery has shown to be effective in controlling gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Yet, a universally accepted definition and evaluation for treatment success/failure in GERD is still controversial. The purpose of this paper is to assess if and how the outcome variables used in the different studies could possibly lead to an homogeneous appraisal of the limits and indications of LARS. Methods. We analyzed papers focusing on the efficacy and outcome of LARS and published in English literature over the last 10 years. Results. Symptoms scores and outcome variables reported are dissimilar and not uniform. The most consistent parameter was patient's satisfaction (mean satisfaction rate: 88.9%). Antireflux medications are not a trustworthy outcome index. Endoscopy and esophageal manometry do not appear very helpful. Twenty-four hours pH metry is recommended in patients difficult to manage for recurrent typical symptoms. Conclusions. More uniform symptoms scales and quality of life tools are needed for assessing the clinical outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. In an era of cost containment, objective evaluation tests should be more specifically addressed. Relying on patient's satisfaction may be ambiguous, yet from this study it can be considered a practical and simple tool.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.
authors.forename: Sandro
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Contini
authors.forename: Carmelo
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Scarpignato
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1999 Jul;86(7):956-60
references.pmid: 10417573
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 1996 Mar 11;156(5):477-84
references.pmid: 8604953
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2006 Mar;141(3):271-5
references.pmid: 16549692
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2003 May;138(5):514-8; discussion 518-9
references.pmid: 12742955
references.citation: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Mar;4(3):299-305
references.pmid: 16527692
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb;103(2):280-7; quiz 288
references.pmid: 17970835
references.citation: JSLS. 2003 Jul-Sep;7(3):211-8
references.pmid: 14558708
references.citation: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jul;28(1):107-26
references.pmid: 18384662
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jan;196(1):51-7; discussion 57-8; author reply 58-9
references.pmid: 12517549
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2001 Feb;136(2):180-4
references.pmid: 11177138
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2002 Apr;89(4):476-81
references.pmid: 11952591
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2006 Apr;191(4):470-8
references.pmid: 16531138
references.citation: South Med J. 2005 Apr;98(4):441-3
references.pmid: 15898520
references.citation: JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2331-8
references.pmid: 11343480
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Jun;11(6):693-700
references.pmid: 17562117
references.citation: Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar;40(3):264-74
references.pmid: 15932167
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jan;13(1):54-60
references.pmid: 18712573
references.citation: Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;25(4):342-51
references.pmid: 19417644
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Mar;12(3):510-7
references.pmid: 18071830
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Nov;12(11):1893-9
references.pmid: 18766417
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2008 May;143(5):482-7
references.pmid: 18490558
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Feb;192(2):172-9; discussion 179-81
references.pmid: 11220717
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):395-400
references.pmid: 11928015
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2003 Aug;186(2):143-7
references.pmid: 12885606
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1298-302
references.pmid: 17972135
references.citation: Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):267-72
references.pmid: 17151804
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2001 Jul;136(7):745-51
references.pmid: 11448383
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):266-71
references.pmid: 14691693
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):159-65
references.pmid: 16333553
references.citation: Gut. 2011 Apr;60(4):435-41
references.pmid: 21193452
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2004 Nov;91(11):1460-5
references.pmid: 15386326
references.citation: Am J Med. 2003 Jan;114(1):1-5
references.pmid: 12543281
references.citation: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Nov;393(6):979-84
references.pmid: 18286301
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;10(7):934-9
references.pmid: 16843863
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003 Jun;13(3):161-4
references.pmid: 12819498
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1037-43
references.pmid: 15180722
references.citation: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Mar 1;23(5):601-5
references.pmid: 16480399
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2007 Feb;94(2):198-203
references.pmid: 17256807
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2002 Sep;137(9):1008-13; discussion 1013-4
references.pmid: 12215150
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2001 Jan-Feb;5(1):42-8
references.pmid: 11309647
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;6(1):3-9; discussion 10
references.pmid: 11986011
references.citation: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;7(12):1292-8; quiz 1260
references.pmid: 19490952
references.citation: Dig Dis Sci. 1998 May;43(5):1001-8
references.pmid: 9590414
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Sep;11(9):1138-45
references.pmid: 17619938
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2006 Jul;244(1):34-41
references.pmid: 16794387
references.citation: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Aug 15;24(4):621-32
references.pmid: 16907894
references.citation: Dis Esophagus. 1999;12(1):22-7
references.pmid: 10941856
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2003 Aug;17(8):1200-5
references.pmid: 12739117