title: Evolution of spur-length diversity in Aquilegia petals is achieved solely through cell-shape anisotropy.
abstract: The role of petal spurs and specialized pollinator interactions has been studied since Darwin. Aquilegia petal spurs exhibit striking size and shape diversity, correlated with specialized pollinators ranging from bees to hawkmoths in a textbook example of adaptive radiation. Despite the evolutionary significance of spur length, remarkably little is known about Aquilegia spur morphogenesis and its evolution. Using experimental measurements, both at tissue and cellular levels, combined with numerical modelling, we have investigated the relative roles of cell divisions and cell shape in determining the morphology of the Aquilegia petal spur. Contrary to decades-old hypotheses implicating a discrete meristematic zone as the driver of spur growth, we find that Aquilegia petal spurs develop via anisotropic cell expansion. Furthermore, changes in cell anisotropy account for 99 per cent of the spur-length variation in the genus, suggesting that the true evolutionary innovation underlying the rapid radiation of Aquilegia was the mechanism of tuning cell shape.
authors.affiliation: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
authors.forename: Joshua R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Puzey
authors.forename: Sharon J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Gerbode
authors.forename: Scott A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Hodges
authors.forename: Elena M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Kramer
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Mahadevan
mesh_terms: D016880:Anisotropy; D031884:Aquilegia / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000166:cytology / Q000254:growth & development; D005075:Biological Evolution; D048430:Cell Shape; D035264:Flowers / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000166:cytology / Q000254:growth & development; D018519:Meristem / Q000166:cytology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology; D054817:Pollination
references.citation: EMBO J. 2002 Mar 15;21(6):1267-79
references.pmid: 11889033
references.citation: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:203-22
references.pmid: 16212493
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):706-9
references.pmid: 17554306
references.citation: Science. 2008 Dec 12;322(5908):1650-5
references.pmid: 19074340
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:65-87
references.pmid: 20192756
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2009 Jun;6(6):458-64
references.pmid: 19412170
references.citation: Development. 2006 Nov;133(21):4305-14
references.pmid: 17038516
references.citation: Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):367-82
references.pmid: 9584110
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):4728-35
references.pmid: 14960734
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 2005;395:617-36
references.pmid: 15865987
references.citation: Plant J. 2011 Nov;68(4):703-14
references.pmid: 21790812
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Jul 29;355(1399):897-922
references.pmid: 11128984
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 12;365(1539):461-8
references.pmid: 20047872
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 1994 Sep;35(6):935-42
references.pmid: 7981964