title: Calculating the peak skin dose resulting from fluoroscopically guided interventions. Part I: Methods.
abstract: While direct measurement of the peak skin dose resulting from a fluoroscopically-guided procedure is possible, the decision must be made a priori at additional cost and time. It is most often the case that the need for accurate knowledge of the peak skin dose is realized only after a procedure has been completed, or after a suspected reaction has been discovered. Part I of this review article discusses methods for calculating the peak skin dose across a range of clinical scenarios. In some cases, a wealth of data are available, while in other cases few data are available and additional data must be measured in order to estimate the peak skin dose. Data may be gathered from a dose report, the DICOM headers of images, or from staff and physician interviews. After data are gathered, specific steps must be followed to convert dose metrics, such as the reference point air kerma (K(a,r)) or the kerma area product (KAP), into peak skin dose. These steps require knowledge of other related factors, such as the f-factor and the backscatter factor, tables of which are provided in this manuscript. Sources of error and the impact of these errors on the accuracy of the final estimate of the peak skin dose are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. kyle.jones@mdanderson.org
authors.forename: A Kyle
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Alexander S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Pasciak
mesh_terms: D005471:Fluoroscopy / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D015641:Radiography, Interventional / Q000379:methods*; D012867:Skin / Q000528:radiation effects*
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 2003 Jun;76(906):406-13
references.pmid: 12814927
references.citation: Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Sep;36 Suppl 2:136-40
references.pmid: 16862416
references.citation: Radiology. 2010 Feb;254(2):326-41
references.pmid: 20093507
references.citation: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Apr;22(4):443-52; quiz 453
references.pmid: 21367618
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1998 Aug;43(8):2237-50
references.pmid: 9725601
references.citation: Med Phys. 1997 Mar;24(3):377-82
references.pmid: 9089590
references.citation: Radiology. 2002 Nov;225(2):329-36
references.pmid: 12409563
references.citation: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Aug;14(8):977-90
references.pmid: 12902555
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Oct 6;44(7):1420-8
references.pmid: 15464322