title: Effects of early developmental conditions on innate immunity are only evident under favourable adult conditions in zebra finches.
abstract: Long-term effects of unfavourable conditions during development can be expected to depend on the quality of the environment experienced by the same individuals during adulthood. Yet, in the majority of studies, long-term effects of early developmental conditions have been assessed under favourable adult conditions only. The immune system might be particularly vulnerable to early environmental conditions as its development, maintenance and use are thought to be energetically costly. Here, we studied the interactive effects of favourable and unfavourable conditions during nestling and adult stages on innate immunity (lysis and agglutination scores) of captive male and female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Nestling environmental conditions were manipulated by a brood size experiment, while a foraging cost treatment was imposed on the same individuals during adulthood. This combined treatment showed that innate immunity of adult zebra finches is affected by their early developmental conditions and varies between both sexes. Lysis scores, but not agglutination scores, were higher in individuals raised in small broods and in males. However, these effects were only present in birds that experienced low foraging costs. This study shows that the quality of the adult environment may shape the long-term consequences of early developmental conditions on innate immunity, as long-term effects of nestling environment were only evident under favourable adult conditions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. greet.decoster@ugent.be
authors.forename: Greet
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: De Coster
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Verhulst
authors.forename: Egbert
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Koetsier
authors.forename: Liesbeth
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: De Neve
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Briga
authors.forename: Luc
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lens
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D052284:Clutch Size / Q000276:immunology; D005260:Female; D046369:Finches / Q000276:immunology*; D007113:Immunity, Innate; D008297:Male; D013312:Stress, Physiological / Q000276:immunology*
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2007 Jan;76(1):201-9
references.pmid: 17184369
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2003 Nov;16(6):1270-9
references.pmid: 14640418
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2011 Apr 15;214(Pt 8):1225-9
references.pmid: 21430197
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Aug;11(8):317-21
references.pmid: 21237861
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2010 Nov 15;213(Pt 22):3810-8
references.pmid: 21037060
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2008 Aug;54(2):238-43
references.pmid: 18190915
references.citation: Am Nat. 2008 Sep;172(3):E99-112
references.pmid: 18665797
references.citation: Oecologia. 1999 Nov;121(3):316-322
references.pmid: 28308319
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2010 Feb;23(2):282-92
references.pmid: 20002246
references.citation: PLoS One. 2007 Sep 19;2(9):e901
references.pmid: 17878936
references.citation: J Comp Physiol B. 2011 May;181(4):551-63
references.pmid: 21140156
references.citation: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2009 Sep-Oct;82(5):561-71
references.pmid: 19650727
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Sep;14(9):343-348
references.pmid: 10441307
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2005 Nov;208(Pt 21):4091-8
references.pmid: 16244168
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2008 Dec 23;4(6):741-4
references.pmid: 18700197
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2010 Sep;213(Pt 17):3012-8
references.pmid: 20709930
references.citation: Dev Comp Immunol. 2005;29(3):275-86
references.pmid: 15572075
references.citation: Immunol Today. 2000 Dec;21(12):624-30
references.pmid: 11114423
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2009 Feb;22(2):387-95
references.pmid: 19196386
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 22;271(1541):833-8
references.pmid: 15255102
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 Sep;60(9):1913-24
references.pmid: 17089975
references.citation: Mol Immunol. 2000 Dec;37(18):1141-9
references.pmid: 11451419
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 May 1;16(5):254-260
references.pmid: 11301155
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):478-80
references.pmid: 17148435
references.citation: Biometrics. 1997 Sep;53(3):983-97
references.pmid: 9333350
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2006 Jan;209(Pt 2):284-91
references.pmid: 16391350
references.citation: Science. 2004 Sep 17;305(5691):1733-6
references.pmid: 15375258
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2005 Nov;208(Pt 21):4099-108
references.pmid: 16244169
references.citation: Int Rev Immunol. 1988 Mar;3(1-2):47-58
references.pmid: 3073179
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 May 12;363(1497):1635-45
references.pmid: 18048301
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):155-64
references.pmid: 9710473
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2009 Jul;212(Pt 13):2085-91
references.pmid: 19525435
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2008 Mar;77(2):356-63
references.pmid: 18194261