title: Relational discrimination by pigeons in a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli: a methodological note.
abstract: A go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli typically establishes emergent behavior that parallels in structure and typical outcome that of conventional tests for symmetric, transitive, and equivalence relations in normally capable adults. The present study employed a go/no-go compound stimulus procedure with pigeons. During training, pecks to two-component compounds A1B1, A2B2, B1C1, and B2C2 were followed by food. Pecks to compounds A1B2, A2B1, B1C2, and B2C1 re-started the 30-s stimulus presentation interval. The absence of pecking to those compounds for 30 s ended the trial. Subsequent tests presented these components in new spatial arrangements and/or in recombinative compounds that together corresponded to conventional tests of symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence: B1A1, B2A2, C1B1, C2B2, A1C1, A2C2, C1A1, C2A2 vs. B1A2, B2A1, C1B2, C2B1, A1C2, A2C1, C1A2, C2A1 (positive vs. negative instances of symmetric, transitive, and equivalence relations). On tests for symmetric relations, all pigeons behaved in a manner consistent with training on both positive instances (i.e., by responding) and on negative instances (i.e., by not responding). By contrast, the pigeons' behavior on tests for transitivity and equivalence was inconsistent with baseline training, thus failing to show the recombinative discrimination performance that is typical of normally capable humans when trained and tested using the go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli.
authors.affiliation: Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, CogniÇão e Ensino, São Paulo, Brazil. heloccisa@yahoo.com.br
authors.forename: Heloísa Cursi
authors.initials: HC
authors.lastname: Campos
authors.forename: Paula
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Debert
authors.forename: Romariz
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: da Silva Barros
authors.forename: William J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: McIlvane
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D010856:Columbidae; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):35-47
references.pmid: 16812425
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jul;92(1):57-84
references.pmid: 20119522
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):565-601
references.pmid: 16812079
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):297-313
references.pmid: 21541173
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):117-37
references.pmid: 10418157
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):173-82
references.pmid: 1645099
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22
references.pmid: 7057129
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):349-65
references.pmid: 17575901
references.citation: Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):188-203
references.pmid: 19380896
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45
references.pmid: 16812849
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82
references.pmid: 19070336
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Sep;92(2):233-43
references.pmid: 20354601
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Jan;87(1):89-96
references.pmid: 17345953
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):147-65
references.pmid: 16262184
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):297-304
references.pmid: 3711776
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23-44
references.pmid: 7057127
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Mar;63(2):165-74
references.pmid: 16812755