title: Static prehension of a horizontally oriented object in three dimensions.
abstract: We studied static prehension of a horizontally oriented object. Specific hypotheses were explored addressing such issues as the sharing patterns of the total moment of force across the digits, presence of mechanically unnecessary digit forces, and trade-off between multi-digit synergies at the two levels of the assumed control hierarchy. Within the assumed hierarchy, at the upper level, the task is shared between the thumb and virtual finger (an imagined finger producing a wrench equal to the sum of the wrenches of individual fingers). At the lower level, action of the virtual finger is shared among the four actual fingers. The subjects held statically a horizontally oriented handle instrumented with six-component force/torque sensors with different loads and torques acting about the long axis of the handle. The thumb acted from above while the four fingers supported the weight of the object. When the external torque was zero, the thumb produced mechanically unnecessary force of about 2.8 N, which did not depend on the external load magnitude. When the external torque was not zero, tangential forces produced over 80% of the total moment of force. The normal forces by the middle and ring fingers produced consistent moments against the external torque, while the normal forces of the index and little fingers did not. Force and moment variables at both hierarchical levels were stabilized by covaried across trials adjustments of forces/moments produced by individual digits with the exception of the normal force analyzed at the lower level of the hierarchy. There was a trade-off between synergy indices computed at the two levels of the hierarchy for the three components of the total force vector, but not for the moment of force components. Overall, the results have shown that task mechanics are only one factor that defines forces produced by individual digits. Other factors, such as loading sensory receptors may lead to mechanically unnecessary forces. There seems to be no single rule (for example, ensuring similar safety margin values) that would describe sharing of the normal and tangential forces and be valid across tasks. Fingers that are traditionally viewed as less accurate (e.g., the ring finger) may perform more consistently in certain tasks. The observations of the trade-off between the synergy indices computed at two levels for the force variables but not for the moment of force variables suggest that the degree of redundancy (the number of excessive elemental variables) at the higher level is an important factor.
authors.affiliation: Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, Rec.Hall-267, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
authors.forename: Yen-Hsun
authors.initials: YH
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: Vladimir M
authors.initials: VM
authors.lastname: Zatsiorsky
authors.forename: Mark L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Latash
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D005260:Female; D005385:Fingers / Q000502:physiology; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology*; D018737:Hand Strength / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D017770:Lifting; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D011312:Pressure; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012449:Safety; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D019415:Torque; D014892:Weight Perception / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Ergonomics. 2009 Jan;52(1):121-35
references.pmid: 19308825
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;194(1):1-15
references.pmid: 19048236
references.citation: Ergonomics. 2004 Jun 22;47(8):876-89
references.pmid: 15204280
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Apr;209(4):571-85
references.pmid: 21331525
references.citation: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;629:597-618
references.pmid: 19227523
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jan;148(1):77-87
references.pmid: 12478398
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2000 Mar;131(2):187-95
references.pmid: 10766271
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Nov;82(5):2393-405
references.pmid: 10561413
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1995;105(3):455-64
references.pmid: 7498399
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1998 Apr;119(3):276-86
references.pmid: 9551828
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2007;165:267-81
references.pmid: 17925252
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):500-13
references.pmid: 18046000
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1993;95(1):131-43
references.pmid: 8405245
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Nov;183(2):259-70
references.pmid: 17703288
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 2008 Sep;40(5):446-76
references.pmid: 18782719
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1997 Oct;117(1):67-79
references.pmid: 9386005
references.citation: Motor Control. 2010 Jul;14(3):294-322
references.pmid: 20702893
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;194(1):79-90
references.pmid: 19096834
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Apr;178(4):565-70
references.pmid: 17380323
references.citation: J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006 Feb;22(2):73-8
references.pmid: 16456766
references.citation: Motor Control. 2008 Apr;12(2):151-72
references.pmid: 18483449
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Sep;78(3):1619-30
references.pmid: 9310447
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jun;93(6):3649-58
references.pmid: 15728759
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 2004 Sep;91(3):148-58
references.pmid: 15378373
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 2007 Jul;39(4):276-90
references.pmid: 17664170
references.citation: Motor Control. 2007 Jul;11(3):276-308
references.pmid: 17715460
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 2002 Jul;87(1):50-7
references.pmid: 12111268
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2004 Mar;155(2):145-55
references.pmid: 14661118
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Feb;93(2):766-76
references.pmid: 15456799
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 May;179(2):167-80
references.pmid: 17103206
references.citation: J Biomech. 2003 Nov;36(11):1745-9
references.pmid: 14522218
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1984;56(3):550-64
references.pmid: 6499981
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Apr;149(3):351-60
references.pmid: 12632237
references.citation: J Appl Biomech. 2008 Feb;24(1):43-50
references.pmid: 18309182
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):604-15
references.pmid: 11495936
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Jun;96(6):2293-300
references.pmid: 15133016