title: Control of social monogamy through aggression in a hermaphroditic shrimp.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Sex allocation theory predicts that in small mating groups simultaneous hermaphroditism is the optimal form of gender expression. Under these conditions, male allocation is predicted to be very low and overall per-capita reproductive output maximal. This is particularly true for individuals that live in pairs, but monogamy is highly susceptible to cheating by both partners. However, certain conditions favour social monogamy in hermaphrodites. This study addresses the influence of group size on group stability and moulting cycles in singles, pairs, triplets and quartets of the socially monogamous shrimp Lysmata amboinensis, a protandric simultaneous hermaphrodite.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The effect of group size was very strong: Exactly one individual in each triplet and exactly two individuals in each quartet were killed in aggressive interactions, resulting in group sizes of two individuals. All killed individuals had just moulted. No mortality occurred in single and pair treatments. The number of moults in the surviving shrimp increased significantly after changing from triplets and quartets to pairs.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Social monogamy in L. amboinensis is reinforced by aggressive expulsion of supernumerous individuals. We suggest that the high risk of mortality in triplets and quartets results in suppression of moulting in groups larger than two individuals and that the feeding ecology of L. amboinensis favours social monogamy.
authors.affiliation: Animal Evolutionary Ecology, Department for Biology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. janine.wong@unibas.ch.
authors.forename: Janine Wy
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.forename: Nico K
authors.initials: NK
authors.lastname: Michiels
references.citation: Integr Comp Biol. 2006 Aug;46(4):430-8
references.pmid: 21672755
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2003 Jun;12(6):1425-33
references.pmid: 12755872
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Aug;97(8):729-41
references.pmid: 20552156
references.citation: Integr Comp Biol. 2006 Aug;46(4):381-9
references.pmid: 21672750
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2009 Feb;22(2):405-15
references.pmid: 19196388
references.citation: Evolution. 2009 Jun;63(6):1377-405
references.pmid: 19245397
references.citation: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002 Nov;129(2):127-33
references.pmid: 12441123
references.citation: Evolution. 2010 May;64(5):1331-45
references.pmid: 20002168
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 May 7;270(1518):935-41
references.pmid: 12803908
references.citation: J Exp Zool. 2002 Feb 15;292(3):287-92
references.pmid: 11857462
references.citation: Sex Dev. 2010;4(1-2):110-8
references.pmid: 20051672
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2005 Sep;18(5):1341-7
references.pmid: 16135129
references.citation: Monogr Popul Biol. 1982;18:1-355
references.pmid: 7144766