title: Polymer physics of the cytoskeleton.
abstract: The cytoskeleton is generally visualized by light or electron microscopy as a meshwork of protein filaments that spans the space between the nuclear envelope and the plasma membrane. In most cell types, this meshwork is formed by a three dimensional composite network of actin filaments, microtubules (MT), and intermediate filaments (IF) together with the host of proteins that bind to the sides or ends of these linear polymers. Cytoskeletal binding proteins regulate filament length, crosslink filaments to each other, and apply forces to the filaments. One approach to modeling the mechanical properties of the cytoskeleton and of cell in general is to consider the elements of the cytoskeleton as polymers, using experimental methods and theoretical models developed for traditional polymers but modified for the much larger, stiffer, and fragile biopolymers comprising the cytoskeleton. The presence of motor proteins that move actin filaments and microtubules also creates a new class of active materials that are out of thermodynamic equilibrium, and unconstrained by limitations of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. These active materials create rich opportunities for experimental design and theoretical developments. The degree to which the mechanics of live cells can usefully be modeled as highly complex polymer networks is by no means certain, and this article will discuss recent progress in quantitatively measuring cytoskeletal polymer systems and relating them to the properties of the cell.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 1010 Vagelos Laboratories, 3340 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
authors.forename: Qi
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Wen
authors.forename: Paul A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Janmey
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Jun;79(6 Pt 1):061914
references.pmid: 19658531
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 8;106(36):15192-7
references.pmid: 19667200
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 5;103(27):10248-10253
references.pmid: 16801537
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(4):923-34
references.pmid: 8432732
references.citation: Biochem J. 1987 Jul 1;245(1):93-101
references.pmid: 3663160
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 5;103(27):10259-10264
references.pmid: 16793927
references.citation: Nat Mater. 2007 Jan;6(1):48-51
references.pmid: 17187066
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Jan 8;104(1):018101
references.pmid: 20366396
references.citation: J Cell Sci. 2011 Jan 1;124(Pt 1):9-18
references.pmid: 21172819
references.citation: Biophys J. 2010 Sep 22;99(6):1852-60
references.pmid: 20858430
references.citation: Pflugers Arch. 2008 Apr;456(1):3-12
references.pmid: 18064487
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 19;315(5810):370-3
references.pmid: 17234946
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2009 Mar 26;113(12):3799-805
references.pmid: 19243107
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000439
references.pmid: 19609348
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Sep;76(3 Pt 1):031906
references.pmid: 17930270
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Sep 12;101(11):118103
references.pmid: 18851336
references.citation: J Biomech. 2010 Jan 5;43(1):15-22
references.pmid: 19811783
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Sep 24;105(13):138102
references.pmid: 21230814
references.citation: J Clin Invest. 2009 Jul;119(7):1772-83
references.pmid: 19587452
references.citation: Biophys J. 2010 May 19;98(10):2147-53
references.pmid: 20483322
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2010 Jun 18;399(4):637-44
references.pmid: 20447406
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10632-7
references.pmid: 19520830
references.citation: Biophys J. 2009 Jun 3;96(11):4725-32
references.pmid: 19486695
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Sep 5;101(10):108101
references.pmid: 18851260
references.citation: Biophys J. 2010 Aug 4;99(3):862-8
references.pmid: 20682264
references.citation: J Biomech. 2010 Jan 5;43(1):9-14
references.pmid: 19913792
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Feb 27;102(8):088102
references.pmid: 19257793
references.citation: Langmuir. 2010 Dec 21;26(24):18595-9
references.pmid: 21082794
references.citation: Nature. 2005 May 12;435(7039):191-4
references.pmid: 15889088
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2009 May 8;102(18):188303
references.pmid: 19518917
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Oct 06;4(10):e7294
references.pmid: 19806221
references.citation: Biophys J. 2006 May 15;90(10):3762-73
references.pmid: 16500961
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Feb;81(2 Pt 1):021904
references.pmid: 20365592
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Nov 16;99(20):208103
references.pmid: 18233190
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1968 Sep;38(3):538-55
references.pmid: 5664223
references.citation: Acta Biomater. 2010 Apr;6(4):1207-18
references.pmid: 19883801
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Mar 21;100(11):118104
references.pmid: 18517833
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Mar 24;96(11):118104
references.pmid: 16605878
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Jan 28;463(7280):485-92
references.pmid: 20110992
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2009 Apr 24;388(1):133-43
references.pmid: 19281820
references.citation: Nat Mater. 2010 Jan;9(1):40-6
references.pmid: 19915555
references.citation: J Struct Biol. 2010 May;170(2):369-76
references.pmid: 20176112
references.citation: Math Biosci Eng. 2009 Jan;6(1):117-34
references.pmid: 19292511
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Jul;82(1 Pt 1):011919
references.pmid: 20866660
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Apr;79(4 Pt 1):041928
references.pmid: 19518277
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Feb 5;104(5):058101
references.pmid: 20366795