title: Evidence-based history taking under "time constraint".
abstract: Physicians all through the world visit patients under time limitations. The most important troubled clinical skill under "time constraint" is the diagnostic approach. In this situation, clinicians need some diagnostic approaches to reduce both diagnostic time and errors. It seems that highly experienced physicians utilize some special tactics in this regard. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) as a relatively new paradigm for clinical practice stresses on using research evidences in diagnostic evaluations. The authors aimed to evaluate experts' strategies and assess what EBM can add to these tactics. They reviewed diagnostic strategies of some veteran internists in their busy outpatient clinics and proposed an evidence-based diagnostic model engaging clinical experience and research evidence. It appears that every clinician utilizes a set of "key pointer" questions for decision-making. In addition to use of evidence-based resources for making differential diagnosis and estimating utility of various diseases, clinicians should use "key pointers" with significant likelihood ratios and from independent systems to reduce time and errors of history taking. Clinical trainees can improve their practice by constructing their own set of pointers from valid research evidences. Using this diagnostic model, EBM can help physicians to struggle against their "time constraint".
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Alireza
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Moayyeri
authors.forename: Akbar
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Soltani
authors.forename: Hamideh
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Moosapour
authors.forename: Mohsin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Raza
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1997 Sep 15;127(6):483-5
references.pmid: 9313007
references.citation: Acad Med. 1995 Mar;70(3):186-93
references.pmid: 7873005
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Sep;12(9):544-50
references.pmid: 9294788
references.citation: Med Educ. 2003 Aug;37(8):695-703
references.pmid: 12895249
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Nov 15;327(7424):1144-6
references.pmid: 14615341
references.citation: Med Educ. 2000 Jun;34(6):437-42
references.pmid: 10792683
references.citation: Acad Med. 2000 Oct;75(10 Suppl):S134-6
references.pmid: 11031198
references.citation: JAMA. 1999 Apr 7;281(13):1214-9
references.pmid: 10199432
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Mar 23;324(7339):729-32
references.pmid: 11909793
references.citation: Acad Med. 2000 Oct;75(10 Suppl):S127-35
references.pmid: 11031197
references.citation: J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 May;7(2):97-107
references.pmid: 11489035
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Mar;18(3):203-8
references.pmid: 12648252
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Dec;88(12):5593-602
references.pmid: 14671138
references.citation: Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):775-80
references.pmid: 12915363
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):335-42
references.pmid: 12795731
references.citation: Acad Med. 1992 Oct;67(10 Suppl):S78-83
references.pmid: 1388563
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jan;14 Suppl 1:S34-40
references.pmid: 9933493
references.citation: J Fam Pract. 1998 Aug;47(2):133-7
references.pmid: 9722801
references.citation: Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2001 Sep;30(3):729-47
references.pmid: 11571938