title: Altruism in clinical research: coordinators' orientation to their professional roles.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Research coordinators have significant responsibilities in clinical trials that often require them to find unique ways to manage their jobs, thus reshaping their professional identities. The purpose of this study was to identify how research coordinators manage role and ethical conflicts within clinical research trials.
  
  
  METHODS
  A qualitative study combining observation and 63 semistructured interviews at 25 research organizations was used.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Altruism is a recurring theme in how research coordinators define and view their work.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Altruism is adopted by research coordinators to: (1) Teach patient-subjects the appropriate reasons to participate in clinical research, (2) minimize the conflict between research and care, and (3) contest the undervaluation of coordinating. Altruism is a strategy used to handle the various conflicts they experience in a difficult job, and it has become part of the professional identity of clinical research coordinators.
authors.affiliation: Center for Biomedical Ethics & Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. jill.fisher@vanderbilt.edu
authors.forename: Jill A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Fisher
authors.forename: Corey A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Kalbaugh
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000533:Altruism; D015400:Clinical Nursing Research / Q000458:organization & administration*; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000941:ethics; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D024802:Nurse's Role / Q000523:psychology*; D009723:Nurse-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics; D015404:Nursing Methodology Research; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000523:psychology*
references.citation: ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1998 Jun;20(4):1-12
references.pmid: 9595170
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(9):1689-97
references.pmid: 14990370
references.citation: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 1998 Jan-Feb;9(1):39-48
references.pmid: 9436166
references.citation: Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug;39(4):3
references.pmid: 19711622
references.citation: Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005 Nov 03;32(6):1123-30
references.pmid: 16270108
references.citation: Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jul;12(3):481-9
references.pmid: 16909150
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 1997 Mar;25(3):434-41
references.pmid: 9080267
references.citation: IRB. 2004 Mar-Apr;26(2):1-8
references.pmid: 15069970
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Sep;28(6):678-94
references.pmid: 17184412
references.citation: J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Fall;30(3):411-9
references.pmid: 12497701
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(4):549-57
references.pmid: 17419791
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jun;66(6):1401-8
references.pmid: 20384639
references.citation: Contemp Nurse. 1992 Apr;1(1):44-7
references.pmid: 1596617
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 1995 Oct;22(4):785-90
references.pmid: 8708200
references.citation: Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2002 Spring;16(1):33-42
references.pmid: 12371467
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Apr;66(7):1451-6
references.pmid: 18222579
references.citation: Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug;39(4):26-36
references.pmid: 19711632
references.citation: Aust J Adv Nurs. 1986 Dec-1987 Feb;4(2):20-8
references.pmid: 3647783
references.citation: Nurs Clin North Am. 2009 Dec;44(4):471-81
references.pmid: 19850183
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 1994 Sep;20(3):444-9
references.pmid: 7963048
references.citation: Urol Nurs. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):55-63, 77
references.pmid: 20359145
references.citation: Nurs Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;59(1):51-7
references.pmid: 20010045
references.citation: Nurs Ethics. 2006 Mar;13(2):180-6
references.pmid: 16526151
references.citation: Gend Work Organ. 2010 Mar 1;17(2):150-173
references.pmid: 21394219