title: Stable small animal ventilation for dynamic lung imaging to support computational fluid dynamics models.
abstract: Pulmonary computational fluid dynamics models require that three-dimensional images be acquired over multiple points in the dynamic breathing cycle without breath holds or changes in ventilatory mechanics. With small animals, these requirements can result in long imaging times (∼90 minutes), over which lung mechanics, such as compliance, may gradually change if not carefully monitored and controlled. These changes, caused by derecruitment of parenchymal tissue, are manifested as an upward drift in peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) or by changes in the pressure waveform and/or lung volume over the course of the experiment. We demonstrate highly repeatable mechanical ventilation in anesthetized rats over a long duration for dynamic lung x-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging. We describe significant updates to a basic commercial ventilator that was acquired for these experiments. Key to achieving consistent results was the implementation of periodic deep breaths, or sighs, of extended duration to maintain lung recruitment. In addition, continuous monitoring of breath-to-breath pressure and volume waveforms and long-term trends in PIP and flow provide diagnostics of changes in breathing mechanics.
authors.affiliation: Biological Monitoring and Modeling, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States of America. Richard.jacob@pnnl.gov
authors.forename: Richard E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Jacob
authors.forename: Wayne J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Lamm
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D057446:Hydrodynamics; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D008168:Lung / Q000502:physiology*; D008954:Models, Biological; D051381:Rats; D012119:Respiration; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;157(1):294-323
references.pmid: 9445314
references.citation: J Comput Phys. 2009 Feb 20;228(3):619-640
references.pmid: 19784397
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Dec;109(6):1960-8
references.pmid: 20671036
references.citation: Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Jul;18(6):753-9
references.pmid: 10930785
references.citation: J Appl Physiol. 1962 May;17:576-8
references.pmid: 13900763
references.citation: J Pediatr Surg. 1993 Mar;28(3):488-93; discussion 494-5
references.pmid: 8468667
references.citation: Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008 Dec;291(12):1628-48
references.pmid: 18951511
references.citation: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2010 Apr;9(2):187-201
references.pmid: 19727874
references.citation: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Jul;57(7):1745-9
references.pmid: 20176535
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2005 Apr;53(4):858-65
references.pmid: 15799053
references.citation: Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008 Nov 30;163(1-3):54-63
references.pmid: 18463006
references.citation: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2010 Oct;34(7):572-8
references.pmid: 20382502
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2004 Sep;11(9):961-70
references.pmid: 15350577
references.citation: ILAR J. 2002;43(3):159-74
references.pmid: 12105383
references.citation: Respir Physiol. 1982 Sep;49(3):315-24
references.pmid: 7146654
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Aug 21;53(16):4285-301
references.pmid: 18653926
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 May;102(5):2046-55
references.pmid: 17255374
references.citation: Respiration. 2011;81(4):333-42
references.pmid: 21311175