title: Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.
abstract: Previous studies have shown that social comparison influences individual's fairness consideration and other-regarding behavior. However, it is not clear how social comparison affects the brain activity in evaluating fairness during asset distribution. In this study, participants, acting as recipients in the ultimatum game, were informed not only of offers to themselves but also of the average amount of offers in other allocator-recipient dyads. Behavioral results showed that the participants were more likely to reject division schemes when they were offered less than the other recipients, especially when the offers were highly unequal. Event-related brain potentials recorded from the participants showed that highly unequal offers elicited more negative-going medial frontal negativity than moderately unequal offers in an early time window (270-360 ms) and this effect was not significantly modulated by social comparison. In a later time window (450-650 ms), however, the late positive potential (LPP) was more positive for moderately unequal offers than for highly unequal offers when the other recipients were offered less than the participants, whereas this distinction disappeared when the other recipients were offered the same as or more than the participants. These findings suggest that the brain activity in evaluating fairness in asset division entails both an earlier (semi-) automatic process in which the brain responds to fairness at an abstract level and a later appraisal process in which factors related to social comparison and fairness norms come into play.
authors.affiliation: Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science (Ministry of Education), Southeast University Nanjing, China.
authors.forename: Yin
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: Yuqin
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Zhou
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: van Dijk
authors.forename: Marijke C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Leliveld
authors.forename: Xiaolin
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Zhou
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2011 Dec;88(2-3):253-62
references.pmid: 21889968
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2011 Jul;48(7):973-9
references.pmid: 21175673
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec;11(4):516-25
references.pmid: 21786030
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Nov;31(11):1741-50
references.pmid: 20205244
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 May;7(5):225-231
references.pmid: 12757825
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jul 19;190(2):218-23
references.pmid: 18406476
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Jun;72(3):299-306
references.pmid: 19232373
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):507-14
references.pmid: 20667034
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2472-80
references.pmid: 20974264
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):477-85
references.pmid: 20601424
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2005 Dec;11(6):563-76
references.pmid: 16282597
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Feb;13(2):160-1
references.pmid: 20023652
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Oct 4;56(1):14-8
references.pmid: 17920011
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):956-62
references.pmid: 19695331
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2005 Mar;42(2):161-70
references.pmid: 15787853
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1767-70
references.pmid: 16794075
references.citation: Dev Neuropsychol. 2010;35(2):129-55
references.pmid: 20390599
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 Aug 25;1286:114-22
references.pmid: 19539614
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Feb 25;463(7284):1089-91
references.pmid: 20182511
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40
references.pmid: 11805825
references.citation: Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1305-8
references.pmid: 18033886
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):448-55
references.pmid: 19822163
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2005 Jul;131(4):510-32
references.pmid: 16060800
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):639-49
references.pmid: 14561118
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):905-12
references.pmid: 17666029
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1986 Nov;23(6):695-703
references.pmid: 3823345
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(1):76-91
references.pmid: 20119878
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(1):118-28
references.pmid: 19851940
references.citation: Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1755-8
references.pmid: 12805551
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Dec;5(4):414-23
references.pmid: 20350933
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 May;15(5):535-44
references.pmid: 15319308
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):339-47
references.pmid: 18399886
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2005 Mar 15;16(4):407-11
references.pmid: 15729147
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Oct;75(4):887-900
references.pmid: 9825526
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 Jul 14;24(28):6258-64
references.pmid: 15254080
references.citation: Science. 2009 Feb 13;323(5916):937-9
references.pmid: 19213918