title: Metacommunity theory explains the emergence of food web complexity.
abstract: Food webs are highly complex ecological networks, dynamic in both space and time. Metacommunity models are now at the core of unified theories of biodiversity, but to date they have not addressed food web complexity. Here we show that metacommunity theory can explain the emergence of species-rich food webs with complex network topologies. Our analysis shows that network branching in the food web is maximized at intermediate colonization rates and limited dispersal scales, which also leads to concomitant peaks in species diversity. Increased food web complexity and species diversity are made possible by the structural role played by network branches that are supported by omnivore and generalist feeding links. Thus, in contrast to traditional food web theory, which emphasizes the destabilizing effect of omnivory feeding in closed systems, metacommunity theory predicts that these feeding links, which are commonly observed in empirical food webs, play a critical structural role as food webs assemble in space. As this mechanism functions at the metacommunity level, evidence for its operation in nature will be obtained through multiscale surveys of food web structure. Finally, we apply our theory to reveal the effects of habitat destruction on network complexity and metacommunity diversity.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1B1. pradeep.research@gmail.com
authors.forename: Pradeep
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pillai
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gonzalez
authors.forename: Michel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Loreau
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D003198:Computer Simulation; D017753:Ecosystem; D020387:Food Chain; D008954:Models, Biological; D011157:Population Dynamics
references.citation: Am Nat. 2003 Nov;162(5):544-57
references.pmid: 14618534
references.citation: Science. 2009 Jul 24;325(5939):416-9
references.pmid: 19628856
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Aug;11(8):867-81
references.pmid: 18445027
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jan 11;445(7124):202-5
references.pmid: 17215842
references.citation: Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):2045-7
references.pmid: 9748167
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2010 May;13(5):543-52
references.pmid: 20236160
references.citation: Am Nat. 2002 Apr;159(4):420-6
references.pmid: 18707425
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):513-23
references.pmid: 21352455
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2011 Mar;98(3):503-16
references.pmid: 21613142
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jun;68(6):1246-8
references.pmid: 16591932