title: Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.
abstract: We tested two explanations for why the slope of the z-transformed receiver operating characteristic (zROC) is less than 1 in recognition memory: the unequal-variance account (target evidence is more variable than lure evidence) and the dual-process account (responding reflects both a continuous familiarity process and a threshold recollection process). These accounts are typically implemented in signal detection models that do not make predictions for response time (RT) data. We tested them using RT data and the diffusion model. Participants completed multiple study/test blocks of an "old"/"new" recognition task with the proportion of targets and the test varying from block to block (.21, .32, .50, .68, or .79 targets). The same participants completed sessions with both speed-emphasis and accuracy-emphasis instructions. zROC slopes were below one for both speed and accuracy sessions, and they were slightly lower for speed. The extremely fast pace of the speed sessions (mean RT=526) should have severely limited the role of the slower recollection process relative to the fast familiarity process. Thus, the slope results are not consistent with the idea that recollection is responsible for slopes below 1. The diffusion model was able to match the empirical zROC slopes and RT distributions when between-trial variability in memory evidence was greater for targets than for lures, but missed the zROC slopes when target and lure variability were constrained to be equal. Therefore, unequal variability in continuous evidence is supported by RT modeling in addition to signal detection modeling. Finally, we found that a two-choice version of the RTCON model could not accommodate the RT distributions as successfully as the diffusion model.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, 441 Tobin Hall, University of Massachusetts – Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. jstarns@psych.umass.edu
authors.forename: Jeffrey J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Starns
authors.forename: Roger
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ratcliff
authors.forename: Gail
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: McKoon
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012372:ROC Curve; D011930:Reaction Time; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 7;107(36):15916-20
references.pmid: 20733082
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jul;34(4):752-68
references.pmid: 18605866
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1992 Jul;99(3):518-35
references.pmid: 1502275
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2009 Jan;116(1):59-83
references.pmid: 19159148
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Sep;15(5):846-58
references.pmid: 2528605
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):464-87
references.pmid: 21707207
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):906-26
references.pmid: 18926982
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1979 May;86(3):446-61
references.pmid: 451109
references.citation: Neural Comput. 2008 Apr;20(4):873-922
references.pmid: 18085991
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):37-60
references.pmid: 24214802
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):452-78
references.pmid: 11381837
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):427-35
references.pmid: 20551370
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):484-99
references.pmid: 20192544
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Feb;139(1):70-94
references.pmid: 20121313
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 May;25(3):563-82
references.pmid: 10368927
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):370-92
references.pmid: 11381834
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):314-34
references.pmid: 16634673
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):763-85
references.pmid: 8064246
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):377-90
references.pmid: 20545422
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):490-7
references.pmid: 21394547
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1210-30
references.pmid: 14622056
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2008 Jan;58(1):140-159
references.pmid: 19122740
references.citation: J Math Psychol. 2010 Feb 1;54(1):39-52
references.pmid: 20431690
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2000 Mar;28(2):161-6
references.pmid: 10790971
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1985 Apr;92(2):212-25
references.pmid: 3991839
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Nov;20(6):1341-54
references.pmid: 7983467
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):864-901
references.pmid: 20658856
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):800-32
references.pmid: 17723031
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):907-22
references.pmid: 11105517
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Mar 23;404(6776):390-4
references.pmid: 10746726
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):438-81
references.pmid: 12412886
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Mar;26(2):294-320
references.pmid: 10764098
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Sep;20(5):1088-98
references.pmid: 7931096
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Sep;90(3):1392-407
references.pmid: 12761282
references.citation: J Math Psychol. 2000 Sep;44(3):408-463
references.pmid: 10973778
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65
references.pmid: 17014301
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):414-35
references.pmid: 11294441
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2002 Oct;109(4):710-21
references.pmid: 12374325
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2003 Oct;110(4):611-46
references.pmid: 14599236
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):152-76
references.pmid: 17227185
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2006 Mar;15(1):147-62
references.pmid: 16019226
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):333-67
references.pmid: 15065913
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):261-82
references.pmid: 15149253
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2008 Aug;59(2):169-182
references.pmid: 19649141
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2004 Jun;19(2):278-89
references.pmid: 15222821
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 May;26(3):582-600
references.pmid: 10855419
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):858-65
references.pmid: 18087950
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1147-66
references.pmid: 15521795
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):825-32
references.pmid: 18792511
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1984 Jan;91(1):1-67
references.pmid: 6571421
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1985 Jan;13(1):8-20
references.pmid: 4010518
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):145-66
references.pmid: 21331823
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2008 Dec;57(4):335-84
references.pmid: 18485339
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1983 May;11(3):307-15
references.pmid: 6621346
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1998 Oct;105(4):724-60
references.pmid: 9830377
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 May;139(2):341-64
references.pmid: 20438255
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2010 May;60(3):127-57
references.pmid: 19962693
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92
references.pmid: 11488378
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Aug;6(8):891-8
references.pmid: 12858179
references.citation: Child Dev. 2012 Jan-Feb;83(1):367-81
references.pmid: 22188547
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jan;72(1):246-73
references.pmid: 20045893
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1999 Apr;106(2):261-300
references.pmid: 10378014
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1756-74
references.pmid: 17122324