title: Is there still any role for minilaparoscopic-cholecystectomy? A general surgeons' last five years experience over 932 cases.
abstract: Laparoscopy has rapidly emerged as the preferred surgical approach in a number of different diseases because it ensures correct diagnoses and appropriate treatment. The use of mini-instruments (5 mm or less in diameter) and, when possible, the reduction of the number of trocars used might be its natural evolution. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a gold standard technique. The aim of the present work is to illustrate the results of the prospective experience of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (5 mm MLC) performed at our institution. Between August 2005 and July 2010 a total of 932 patients (mean age 45 years) underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Amongst them, 887 (95.1%) were operated on with a 5 mm-three trocar approach and in the remaining 45 cases (4.8%) a 3 mm trocar was used. The primary endpoint was the feasibility rate of the techniques. Secondary endpoints were safety and the impact of the techniques on duration of laparoscopy. In two cases conversion to laparotomy was necessary. We needed to add a fourth-5 mm trocar in the 10.7% of the cases (95 patients) in the 5 mm MLC. There were two cases of redo-laparoscopy in this group due to bile leakage from the cystic duct in one case, and to bleeding from the gallbladder bed in the other. Minor occurrence ranged as high as 2.1% in the 5 mm-MLC group, while it was nil in the 3 mm-MLC patients. The present experience shows that the 5 mm-three trocars MLC is a safe, easy, effective and reproducible approach to gallbladder diseases. Such features make the technique a challenging alternative to conventional laparoscopy both in the acute and the scheduled setting. We consider the 3 mm-MLC approach suitable only in selected cases, young and thin patients, due to the fragility of the smaller instruments.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Civile, Vittorio Veneto, Italy. fagresta@libero.it
authors.forename: Ferdinando
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Agresta
authors.forename: Natalino
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Bedin
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D023381:Endpoint Determination; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1255-62
references.pmid: 17943358
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1854-60
references.pmid: 20135180
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2005 Dec;140(12):1178-83
references.pmid: 16365239
references.citation: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001 Apr;11(2):85-8
references.pmid: 11327132
references.citation: J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001 Jun;46(3):138-42
references.pmid: 11478009
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2001 Mar;15(3):293-6
references.pmid: 11344432
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2005 Jan;19(1):153
references.pmid: 15531970
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 1999 Mar;13(3):211-7
references.pmid: 10064748
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Feb;20(1):30-5
references.pmid: 20173618
references.citation: Chir Ital. 2003 Sep-Oct;55(5):699-705
references.pmid: 14587115
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1842-8
references.pmid: 20174950
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2002 Feb;16(2):323-6
references.pmid: 11967689
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1746-51
references.pmid: 20054565
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Jun;8(3):171-9
references.pmid: 9649038
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2003 May;17(5):766-72
references.pmid: 12618946
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2002 Apr;16(4):589-91
references.pmid: 11972194
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2003 Nov;90(11):1345-8
references.pmid: 14598412
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2003 Sep;17(9):1434-6
references.pmid: 12799892
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1248-54
references.pmid: 17943359
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2000 Apr;14(4):345-8
references.pmid: 10790552
references.citation: Acta Cir Bras. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):543-50
references.pmid: 19030754
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Mar;14(3):506-10
references.pmid: 19967564
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):336-7
references.pmid: 20419323
references.citation: Chir Ital. 2007 May-Jun;59(3):371-7
references.pmid: 17663379
references.citation: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005 Jun;15(3):294-7
references.pmid: 15954832
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Aug;11(4):248-51
references.pmid: 11525369
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2001 Jan;88(1):45-7
references.pmid: 11136308
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):379-82
references.pmid: 14716538
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):458-64
references.pmid: 11928028
references.citation: World J Surg. 2002 Dec;26(12):1437-40
references.pmid: 12297935
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 1998 Mar;12(3):197
references.pmid: 9502693
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Aug;12(4):301-2; author reply 302-4
references.pmid: 12193832
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1624-7
references.pmid: 12874694
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Jun;19(3):267-71
references.pmid: 19542860
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2003 May;17(5):811-3
references.pmid: 12584599
references.citation: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Apr;17(2):191-9
references.pmid: 17484646
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2001 Oct;15(10):1208-12
references.pmid: 11727102
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Jun;14(3):141-4
references.pmid: 15471020
references.citation: Hong Kong Med J. 2005 Feb;11(1):30-5
references.pmid: 15687513
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2541-53
references.pmid: 18810546