title: The electric field near human skin wounds declines with age and provides a noninvasive indicator of wound healing.
abstract: Due to the transepidermal potential of 15-50 mV, inside positive, an injury current is driven out of all human skin wounds. The flow of this current generates a lateral electric field within the epidermis that is more negative at the wound edge than at regions more lateral from the wound edge. Electric fields in this region could be as large as 40 mV/mm, and electric fields of this magnitude have been shown to stimulate human keratinocyte migration toward the wounded region. After flowing out of the wound, the current returns through the space between the epidermis and stratum corneum, generating a lateral field above the epidermis in the opposite direction. Here, we report the results from the first clinical trial designed to measure this lateral electric field adjacent to human skin wounds noninvasively. Using a new instrument, the Dermacorder®, we found that the mean lateral electric field in the space between the epidermis and stratum corneum adjacent to a lancet wound in 18-25-year-olds is 107-148 mV/mm, 48% larger on average than that in 65-80-year-olds. We also conducted extensive measurements of the lateral electric field adjacent to mouse wounds as they healed and compared this field with histological sections through the wound to determine the correlation between the electric field and the rate of epithelial wound closure. Immediately after wounding, the average lateral electric field was 122 ± 9 mV/mm. When the wound is filled in with a thick, disorganized epidermal layer, the mean field falls to 79 ± 4 mV/mm. Once this epidermis forms a compact structure with only three cell layers, the mean field is 59 ± 5 mV/mm. Thus, the peak-to-peak spatial variation in surface potential is largest in fresh wounds and slowly declines as the wound closes. The rate of wound healing is slightly greater when wounds are kept moist as expected, but we could find no correlation between the amplitude of the electric field and the rate of wound healing.
authors.affiliation: BioElectroMed Corp., Burlingame, California 94010, USA. rich@bioelectromed.com
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Nuccitelli
authors.forename: Pamela
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Nuccitelli
authors.forename: Changyi
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Suman
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Narsing
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Pariser
authors.forename: Kaying
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lui
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D055724:Electrophysiological Phenomena; D004817:Epidermis / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D008812:Mice, Hairless; D012867:Skin / Q000293:injuries*; D012879:Skin Physiological Phenomena; D014945:Wound Healing / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2004 Mar-Apr;9(2):274-81
references.pmid: 15065891
references.citation: J Cell Sci. 1996 Jan;109 ( Pt 1):199-207
references.pmid: 8834804
references.citation: Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009 Aug;20(6):674-82
references.pmid: 19146969
references.citation: Nature. 1963 Oct 26;200:377-8
references.pmid: 14087904
references.citation: Int J Cosmet Sci. 2001 Dec;23(6):353-62
references.pmid: 18498486
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 1981 Jun;104(6):627-33
references.pmid: 6166309
references.citation: Wound Repair Regen. 2008 May-Jun;16(3):432-41
references.pmid: 18471262
references.citation: J Cell Physiol. 2011 Jun;226(6):1544-53
references.pmid: 20945376
references.citation: Am J Surg. 1994 Jan;167(1A):2S-6S
references.pmid: 8109679
references.citation: J Exp Zool. 1996 Jan 1;274(1):56-62
references.pmid: 8583208
references.citation: Nature. 1962 Jan 20;193:293-4
references.pmid: 14007593
references.citation: Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004 Jan-Feb;6(1):21-5
references.pmid: 14732640
references.citation: Med Sci Monit. 2009 Jun;15(6):CR261-8
references.pmid: 19478695
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 1983 Nov;109(5):515-22
references.pmid: 6639877
references.citation: Skin Res Technol. 2002 Feb;8(1):52-6
references.pmid: 12005120
references.citation: Exp Eye Res. 1992 Jun;54(6):999-1003
references.pmid: 1521590
references.citation: Am J Physiol. 1982 Mar;242(3):R358-66
references.pmid: 7065232
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1974 Nov;63(2 Pt 1):614-28
references.pmid: 4421919
references.citation: Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003;58:1-26
references.pmid: 14711011