title: Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Using De-epithelialized Dermal Flap: A New Technique.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although autogenous materials have been used in abdominal wall hernioplasty for a long time, the introduction of prosthetic materials diminished their popularity. However, these materials may be expensive, inappropriate or unavailable. The aim of this study is to determine the place of de-epithelialized dermal flap in the reconstruction of abdominal wall hernias.
  
  
  METHODS
  A five-year prospective, descriptive analysis of eligible patients with difficult abdominal wall hernias closed with de-epithelialized dermal flap in a Nigerian Tertiary Health Institution, from January 2001 to December 2005.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Over the five-year period, 37 patients were recruited into the study. There were 11 males and 26 females, giving a male: female ratio of 1: 2.4. The ages ranged from 8 months to 47 years (mean = 12.6 years). The defects consisted of 15 incisional hernias, 12 intermuscular/inferior lumbar hernias, nine healed exomphalos major and two giant umbilical hernias. The size of the hernia defects ranged from 4.5 cm to13cm (mean = 6.4 cm). Three patients had bowel resection and end-to-end anastomosis, in addition to the flap reconstruction. Morbidity was minimal and included skin dimpling in 11 patients, seroma in three, and wound infection in two patients. Neither recurrence of herniation nor mortality was recorded during the period of follow-up, which ranged from three months to 4.5 years (mean = nine months).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results suggest that this is a useful technique that can easily be applied in many centers with minimal resources. It is cheap, effective and associated with minimal morbidity.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria.
authors.forename: J N
authors.initials: JN
authors.lastname: Legbo
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Legbo
references.citation: Biomaterials. 1998 Dec;19(24):2235-46
references.pmid: 9884036
references.citation: J Pediatr Surg. 1979 Dec;14(6):733-4
references.pmid: 551152
references.citation: Eur J Surg. 1997 Mar;163(3):191-8
references.pmid: 9085061
references.citation: J Pediatr Surg. 1988 Nov;23(11):1018-20
references.pmid: 3244076
references.citation: Hernia. 2003 Sep;7(3):118-24
references.pmid: 12942345
references.citation: Surg Clin North Am. 1984 Apr;64(2):315-33
references.pmid: 6233735
references.citation: Hernia. 2003 Dec;7(4):191-6
references.pmid: 12811619
references.citation: J Pediatr Surg. 1980 Aug;15(4):543-8
references.pmid: 7411367
references.citation: Br J Plast Surg. 1990 Mar;43(2):241-3
references.pmid: 2328387
references.citation: West Afr J Med. 2001 Jul-Sep;20(3):231-3
references.pmid: 11922157
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2001 Oct;88(10):1321-3
references.pmid: 11578284
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 1999 Mar;13(3):250-2
references.pmid: 10064757
references.citation: Surgeon. 2006 Feb;4(1):33-8, 62
references.pmid: 16459498
references.citation: Pediatr Pulmonol. 1992 Mar;12(3):174-80
references.pmid: 1386420
references.citation: Hernia. 2001 Sep;5(3):142-7
references.pmid: 11759800
references.citation: Surgery. 1996 Oct;120(4):738-43; discussion 743-4
references.pmid: 8862386
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 10;343(6):392-8
references.pmid: 10933738