title: Prevalence and Impact of Dysmenorrhoea among Omani High School Students.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of dysmenorrhoea in Omani high schoolgirls, its impact and the treatment used.
  
  
  METHODS
  A cross-sectional survey was carried out in May 2010 on 404 girls from two public high schools in the Muscat region. Data were collected by self-administered questionnaire including information on demographics, prevalence of dysmenorrhoea, severity, its impact, and the treatment used.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, 94% (n = 380) of the participants had dysmenorrhoea. It was mild in 27% (n = 104), moderate in 41% (n = 155), and severe in 32% (n = 121). Dysmenorrhoea was the cause of limited sports activities in 81%, decreased class concentration in 75%, restricted homework in 59%, school absenteeism in 45%, limited social activities in 25%, and decreased academic performance in 8% of the affected students. Only 3% (n = 10) had consulted a physician; 21% (n = 80) self-medicated, and 55% (n = 210) took no action. The commonest drugs used were paracetamol (n = 60, 16%), ibuprofen (n = 29, 8%) and mefenemic acid (n = 12, 3%). There was no statistically significant correlation between dysmenorrhoea, demographics and menstrual characteristics.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Dysmenorrhoea is a prevalent and yet undertreated menstrual disorder among Omani adolescent schoolgirls. The pain suffered can be severe and disabling. Doctors should therefore be prepared to discuss this more freely with schoolgirls. In addition, there is a need for education regarding dysmenorrhoea and treatment options to minimise the impact on school, sports, social and daily activities.
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Medicine & Public Health, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman;
authors.forename: Rahma
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Al-Kindi
authors.forename: Anbarin
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Al-Bulushi
references.citation: Drugs. 1988 Oct;36(4):475-90
references.pmid: 3069437
references.citation: J Adolesc Health Care. 1988 Sep;9(5):398-402
references.pmid: 3170307
references.citation: East Mediterr Health J. 2005 Jan-Mar;11(1-2):155-63
references.pmid: 16532684
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;87(1):55-8
references.pmid: 8532266
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Dec;107(3):240-3
references.pmid: 19716130
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Jul;97(7):588-94
references.pmid: 2390501
references.citation: Tanzan J Health Res. 2009 Oct;11(4):181-8
references.pmid: 20734697
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Nov;103(11):1134-42
references.pmid: 8917003
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Nov 15;144(6):655-60
references.pmid: 7137249
references.citation: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010 Dec;23(6):358-63
references.pmid: 21056354
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 May;37(5):442-51
references.pmid: 21208343
references.citation: Clin J Pain. 1999 Dec;15(4):313-20
references.pmid: 10617260
references.citation: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Dec;154(12):1226-9
references.pmid: 11115307
references.citation: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010 Oct;23(5):267-72
references.pmid: 20493741
references.citation: J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Oct;87 Suppl 3:S69-73
references.pmid: 21218593
references.citation: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2001 Feb;14(1):3-8
references.pmid: 11358700
references.citation: Indian J Community Med. 2010 Jan;35(1):159-64
references.pmid: 20606943
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Feb;108(2):139-42
references.pmid: 19944416
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Nov 15;144(10):980-8
references.pmid: 8916509
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Jan;100(1):13-7
references.pmid: 17888923
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Aug;97(8):734-9
references.pmid: 2400752
references.citation: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009 Dec;22(6):365-71
references.pmid: 19647453