title: Intraoperative neurocytology of primary central nervous system neoplasia: A simplified and practical diagnostic approach.
abstract: Intraoperative consultations may pose considerable diagnostic challenge to the neuropathologist in diagnosing primary and metastatic neoplasms of the central nervous system (CNS). Cytological preparations in the form of squash, touch, imprint or smears are few of the available modalities in addition to the frozen section (FS). Although the latter is superior in providing both histologic patterns and cytomorphologic details yet smears are of vital importance when tissue available is limited (stereotactic biopsy), scrutinisation of intercellular matrix (astrocytoma versus oligodendroglioma) and evaluation of discohesive cells (lymphoma, pituitary adenoma) and in inflammatory lesions. This review is intended to emphasize the value, applicability and limitations of neurocytology aiming to expedite the intraoperative smear-based diagnoses of CNS neoplasia as per the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We recommend that whenever possible, both smears and FS should be examined concomitantly and in a correlative manner. In the unlikely event of a mismatch between the findings on smear and FS, intraoperative diagnosis is primarily based on FS, if adequate tissue is available. However, each case must be evaluated on its own merit and in difficult cases relevant differential diagnoses should be offered to facilitate surgical decisions and optimally triage patient management.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Georgia Health Sciences University Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, United States.
authors.forename: Suash
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sharma
authors.forename: Prabal
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Deb
references.citation: Trop Doct. 2004 Oct;34(4):223-5
references.pmid: 15510948
references.citation: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007 Oct;131(10):1532-40
references.pmid: 17922589
references.citation: Am J Surg Pathol. 1989 Mar;13(3):237-43
references.pmid: 2919721
references.citation: Acta Cytol. 2004 Mar-Apr;48(2):194-8
references.pmid: 15085751
references.citation: Pathology. 1994 Oct;26(4):410-3
references.pmid: 7892040
references.citation: Cancer. 2005 Apr 25;105(2):65-70
references.pmid: 15690353
references.citation: Acta Cytol. 2002 Jul-Aug;46(4):667-74
references.pmid: 12146028
references.citation: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Dec;129(12):1635-52
references.pmid: 16329736
references.citation: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 May;121(5):477-80
references.pmid: 9167600
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1999 Sep;91(3):454-8
references.pmid: 10470821
references.citation: Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;121(3-4):196-8
references.pmid: 8390137
references.citation: Neurochirurgie. 2003 May;49(2-3 Pt 1):67-72
references.pmid: 12746721
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1993 Dec;79(6):859-66
references.pmid: 8246054
references.citation: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Dec;129(12):1653-60
references.pmid: 16329737
references.citation: Acta Neurol Scand. 2003 Sep;108(3):153-6
references.pmid: 12911456
references.citation: Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1994 Jan;5(1):1-18
references.pmid: 8124086
references.citation: Acta Cytol. 1995 Jul-Aug;39(4):693-7
references.pmid: 7543235
references.citation: Mod Pathol. 1988 Sep;1(5):378-84
references.pmid: 3237713
references.citation: Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1984;33:171-81
references.pmid: 6375290
references.citation: Acta Cytol. 1994 May-Jun;38(3):331-4
references.pmid: 8191821
references.citation: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1995;65(1-4):187-93
references.pmid: 8916352
references.citation: Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2001 Apr;31(2):133-9
references.pmid: 11337901
references.citation: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 May;121(5):481-4
references.pmid: 9167601