title: Estimation of absolute protein quantities of unlabeled samples by selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry.
abstract: For many research questions in modern molecular and systems biology, information about absolute protein quantities is imperative. This information includes, for example, kinetic modeling of processes, protein turnover determinations, stoichiometric investigations of protein complexes, or quantitative comparisons of different proteins within one sample or across samples. To date, the vast majority of proteomic studies are limited to providing relative quantitative comparisons of protein levels between limited numbers of samples. Here we describe and demonstrate the utility of a targeting MS technique for the estimation of absolute protein abundance in unlabeled and nonfractionated cell lysates. The method is based on selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry and the "best flyer" hypothesis, which assumes that the specific MS signal intensity of the most intense tryptic peptides per protein is approximately constant throughout a whole proteome. SRM-targeted best flyer peptides were selected for each protein from the peptide precursor ion signal intensities from directed MS data. The most intense transitions per peptide were selected from full MS/MS scans of crude synthetic analogs. We used Monte Carlo cross-validation to systematically investigate the accuracy of the technique as a function of the number of measured best flyer peptides and the number of SRM transitions per peptide. We found that a linear model based on the two most intense transitions of the three best flying peptides per proteins (TopPep3/TopTra2) generated optimal results with a cross-correlated mean fold error of 1.8 and a squared Pearson coefficient R(2) of 0.88. Applying the optimized model to lysates of the microbe Leptospira interrogans, we detected significant protein abundance changes of 39 target proteins upon antibiotic treatment, which correlate well with literature values. The described method is generally applicable and exploits the inherent performance advantages of SRM, such as high sensitivity, selectivity, reproducibility, and dynamic range, and estimates absolute protein concentrations of selected proteins at minimized costs.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Christina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ludwig
authors.forename: Manfred
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Claassen
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Schmidt
authors.forename: Ruedi
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Aebersold
mesh_terms: D000890:Anti-Infective Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D001426:Bacterial Proteins / Q000032:analysis* / Q000378:metabolism*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D002939:Ciprofloxacin / Q000494:pharmacology; D007553:Isotope Labeling; D007921:Leptospira interrogans / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism*; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D010446:Peptide Fragments / Q000378:metabolism*; D040901:Proteomics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D049490:Systems Biology; D053719:Tandem Mass Spectrometry
chemical_list: D000890:Anti-Infective Agents; D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D010446:Peptide Fragments; D002939:Ciprofloxacin
references.citation: Cell. 2009 Aug 21;138(4):795-806
references.pmid: 19664813
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Oct 30;455(7217):1251-4
references.pmid: 18820680
references.citation: Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4:222
references.pmid: 18854821
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Feb;27(2):190-8
references.pmid: 19169245
references.citation: J Proteome Res. 2009 Jun;8(6):2733-9
references.pmid: 19326923
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Jun;10(6):M110.006593
references.pmid: 21357624
references.citation: Cell. 2010 Dec 10;143(6):951-65
references.pmid: 21145461
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007 Dec;6(12):2139-49
references.pmid: 17848587
references.citation: Curr Genomics. 2008 Jun;9(4):263-74
references.pmid: 19452043
references.citation: Sci Signal. 2010 Jan 12;3(104):ra3
references.pmid: 20068231
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2009 Mar;6(3):203-5
references.pmid: 19198594
references.citation: Biotechniques. 2008 Apr;44(5):649-54
references.pmid: 18474040
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2010 Dec 15;82(24):10116-24
references.pmid: 21090646
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Jul;27(7):633-41
references.pmid: 19561596
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2008 Oct;5(10):873-5
references.pmid: 18806791
references.citation: J Proteome Res. 2011 Jan 7;10(1):231-40
references.pmid: 20968307
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2010 Apr 1;82(7):2784-96
references.pmid: 20225856
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008 Feb;7(2):442-7
references.pmid: 18029347
references.citation: J Immunol Methods. 2002 Sep 1;267(1):13-26
references.pmid: 12135797
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Sep;10(9):M110.006353
references.pmid: 21632744
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 10;100(12):6940-5
references.pmid: 12771378
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Nov;22(11):1459-66
references.pmid: 15529173
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Jan;25(1):125-31
references.pmid: 17195840
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Aug;21(8):927-31
references.pmid: 12858183
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2008 Jun 10;5(6):e123
references.pmid: 18547137
references.citation: Mol Syst Biol. 2011 Jul 19;7:510
references.pmid: 21772258
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007 Aug;6(8):1416-27
references.pmid: 17510050
references.citation: Proteomics. 2012 Apr;12(8):1170-5
references.pmid: 22318887
references.citation: Biomed Mass Spectrom. 1983 Aug;10(8):471-9
references.pmid: 6616023
references.citation: Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2008 Sep;7(5):340-54
references.pmid: 18579614
references.citation: Proteomics. 2010 Mar;10(6):1150-9
references.pmid: 20101611
references.citation: J Proteomics. 2010 Aug 5;73(9):1740-6
references.pmid: 20576481
references.citation: Proteomics. 2005 Aug;5(13):3537-45
references.pmid: 16041671
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 1;26(7):966-8
references.pmid: 20147306
references.citation: Anal Biochem. 1985 Oct;150(1):76-85
references.pmid: 3843705
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2010 Jan;7(1):43-6
references.pmid: 19966807
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 22;108(8):3342-7
references.pmid: 21300890
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2011 May;8(5):430-5
references.pmid: 21423193
references.citation: Nature. 2011 May 19;473(7347):337-42
references.pmid: 21593866
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Aug 6;460(7256):762-5
references.pmid: 19606093
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Apr 24;422(6934):888-93
references.pmid: 12712204
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006 Jan;5(1):144-56
references.pmid: 16219938
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008 Apr;7(4):813-23
references.pmid: 18089551
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005 Sep;4(9):1265-72
references.pmid: 15958392
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Sep;25(9):1001-6
references.pmid: 17846631
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Jul;28(7):710-21
references.pmid: 20622845
references.citation: EMBO Rep. 2008 May;9(5):429-34
references.pmid: 18451766
references.citation: J Proteome Res. 2009 Feb;8(2):787-97
references.pmid: 19105742
references.citation: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007 Oct;389(4):1017-31
references.pmid: 17668192
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Jan;25(1):117-24
references.pmid: 17187058