title: On the validity of the likelihood ratio test and consistency of resulting parameter estimates in joint linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis under improperly specified parametric models.
abstract: It has been shown that parametric analysis of linkage disequilibrium conditional on linkage using an overly deterministic model can be optimal for family-based association analysis. However, if one applies this strategy carelessly, there is a risk of false inference. We analyse properties of such likelihood ratio tests when the assumed disease mode of inheritance is inaccurate. Under some conditions, problems result if one is not careful to consider what null hypothesis is being tested. We show that: (a) tests for which the null hypothesis assumes the absence of both linkage and association are independent of the true mode of inheritance; (b) likelihood ratio tests assuming either linkage or association under the null hypothesis may depend on the true mode of inheritance, leading to inconsistent parameter estimates, in particular under extremely deterministic models; (c) this problem cannot be eliminated by increasing sample size or adding population controls--as sample size increases, the chance of false positive inference goes to 100%; (d) this issue can lead to systematic false positive inference of association in regions of linkage. This is important because highly deterministic models are often used intentionally in model-based analyses because they can have more power than the true model, and are implicit in many model-free analysis methods.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, University of Helsinki, Finland. tero.hiekkalinna@helsinki.fi
authors.forename: Tero
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hiekkalinna
authors.forename: Harald H H
authors.initials: HH
authors.lastname: Göring
authors.forename: Joseph D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Terwilliger
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005190:Family; D008040:Genetic Linkage; D005838:Genotype; D006801:Humans; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D015810:Linkage Disequilibrium; D008957:Models, Genetic; D015233:Models, Statistical; D010641:Phenotype
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 1986;3(1):39-52
references.pmid: 3957003
references.citation: Hum Biol. 2000 Feb;72(1):63-132
references.pmid: 10721614
references.citation: Hum Hered. 2008;66(2):87-98
references.pmid: 18382088
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Mar;52(3):506-16
references.pmid: 8447318
references.citation: Hum Hered. 2000 Jul-Aug;50(4):211-23
references.pmid: 10782012
references.citation: Ann Med. 2003;35(7):532-44
references.pmid: 14649335
references.citation: Hum Hered. 1994 Jul-Aug;44(4):225-37
references.pmid: 8056435
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;20(2):217-23
references.pmid: 21934707
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1984 Mar;36(2):460-5
references.pmid: 6585139
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1347-63
references.pmid: 8651312
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jul;67(1):170-81
references.pmid: 10827107
references.citation: Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):997-1004
references.pmid: 11315092
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2000;19 Suppl 1:S36-42
references.pmid: 11055368
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
references.pmid: 17701901
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9
references.pmid: 16862161
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Apr;66(4):1310-27
references.pmid: 10731466
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2006 May;78(5):778-792
references.pmid: 16642434
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1996 Oct;14(2):199-202
references.pmid: 8841195
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(11):3443-6
references.pmid: 6587361
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jun;86(11):4175-8
references.pmid: 2726769
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1996 Aug;13(4):477-80
references.pmid: 8696346
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Oct;65(4):1170-7
references.pmid: 10486336
references.citation: Adv Genet. 2001;42:351-91
references.pmid: 11037331
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 1990;7(5):309-18
references.pmid: 2253866
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Aug;51(2):283-90
references.pmid: 1642229
references.citation: Hum Hered. 1992;42(6):337-46
references.pmid: 1493912
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Jul;53(1):252-63
references.pmid: 8317490
references.citation: Biometrics. 1986 Jun;42(2):393-9
references.pmid: 3741977
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Mar;66(3):1095-106
references.pmid: 10712220
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Jun;76(6):934-49
references.pmid: 15877278
references.citation: Hum Hered. 2011;71(4):256-66
references.pmid: 21811076
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2000 Oct;26(2):151-7
references.pmid: 11017069