title: A non-verbal Turing test: differentiating mind from machine in gaze-based social interaction.
abstract: In social interaction, gaze behavior provides important signals that have a significant impact on our perception of others. Previous investigations, however, have relied on paradigms in which participants are passive observers of other persons' gazes and do not adjust their gaze behavior as is the case in real-life social encounters. We used an interactive eye-tracking paradigm that allows participants to interact with an anthropomorphic virtual character whose gaze behavior is responsive to where the participant looks on the stimulus screen in real time. The character's gaze reactions were systematically varied along a continuum from a maximal probability of gaze aversion to a maximal probability of gaze-following during brief interactions, thereby varying contingency and congruency of the reactions. We investigated how these variations influenced whether participants believed that the character was controlled by another person (i.e., a confederate) or a computer program. In a series of experiments, the human confederate was either introduced as naïve to the task, cooperative, or competitive. Results demonstrate that the ascription of humanness increases with higher congruency of gaze reactions when participants are interacting with a naïve partner. In contrast, humanness ascription is driven by the degree of contingency irrespective of congruency when the confederate was introduced as cooperative. Conversely, during interaction with a competitive confederate, judgments were neither based on congruency nor on contingency. These results offer important insights into what renders the experience of an interaction truly social: Humans appear to have a default expectation of reciprocation that can be influenced drastically by the presumed disposition of the interactor to either cooperate or compete.
authors.affiliation: Neuroimaging Group, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. ulrich.pfeiffer@uk-koeln.de
authors.forename: Ulrich J
authors.initials: UJ
authors.lastname: Pfeiffer
authors.forename: Bert
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Timmermans
authors.forename: Gary
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Bente
authors.forename: Kai
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Vogeley
authors.forename: Leonhard
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Schilbach
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D012919:Social Behavior; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):2046-56
references.pmid: 19524043
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Jul;14(4):334-9
references.pmid: 12807406
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):407-13
references.pmid: 17576280
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):639-48
references.pmid: 17296598
references.citation: Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1305-8
references.pmid: 18033886
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jun;76(6):893-910
references.pmid: 10402679
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Sep;7(9):397-402
references.pmid: 12963470
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 May 18;50(4):531-4
references.pmid: 16701204
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Aug;24(6):581-604
references.pmid: 10940436
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):127-34
references.pmid: 19217822
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1963 Sep;76:386-94
references.pmid: 13947729
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):864-86
references.pmid: 17907867
references.citation: Front Integr Neurosci. 2010 Mar 19;4:5
references.pmid: 20428494
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):455-61
references.pmid: 17049884
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):451-62
references.pmid: 19733618
references.citation: Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;15(1):1-4
references.pmid: 18568084
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Apr;7(4):268-77
references.pmid: 16552413
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2699-710
references.pmid: 20679113
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):236-9
references.pmid: 15733205
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2007 Oct;76(2):95-9
references.pmid: 17804178
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Mar;1191:42-61
references.pmid: 20392275
references.citation: Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007 Oct 1;16(5):269-274
references.pmid: 19343102
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2702-15
references.pmid: 19929761
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Jun;11(6):449
references.pmid: 20485366
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):535-42; discussion 543-50
references.pmid: 19091603
references.citation: Front Behav Neurosci. 2010 May 28;4:22
references.pmid: 20577590
references.citation: Autism. 2012 Mar;16(2):151-62
references.pmid: 21810910
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 12;363(1499):2021-31
references.pmid: 18292061
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(9):2423-30
references.pmid: 18402988
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):784-90
references.pmid: 15582384
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Mar;5(1):98-107
references.pmid: 20223797
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;180(2):333-43
references.pmid: 17256158
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735
references.pmid: 16262930
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Apr 25;27(17):4587-97
references.pmid: 17460071
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:259-89
references.pmid: 17002553
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1639-47
references.pmid: 20096792