title: Automated detection and cell density assessment of keratocytes in the human corneal stroma from ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomograms.
abstract: Keratocytes are fibroblast-like cells that maintain the optical clarity and the overall health of the cornea. The ability to measure precisely their density and spatial distribution in the cornea is important for the understanding of corneal healing processes and the diagnostics of some corneal disorders. A novel computerized approach to detection and counting of keratocyte cells from ultra high resolution optical coherence tomography (UHR-OCT) images of the human corneal stroma is presented. The corneal OCT data is first processed using a state-of-the-art despeckling algorithm to reduce the effect of speckle on detection accuracy. A thresholding strategy is then employed to allow for improved delineation of keratocyte cells by suppressing similarly shaped features in the data, followed by a second-order moment analysis to identify potential cell nuclei candidates. Finally, a local extrema strategy is used to refine the candidates to determine the locations and the number of keratocyte cells. Cell density distribution analysis was carried in 3D UHR-OCT images of the human corneal stroma, acquired in-vivo. The cell density results obtained using the proposed novel approach correlate well with previous work on computerized keratocyte cell counting from confocal microscopy images of human cornea.
authors.forename: Amir-Hossein
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Karimi
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.forename: Kostadinka
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Bizheva
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Feb;40(2):320-6
references.pmid: 9950589
references.citation: Opt Express. 2009 Aug 17;17(17):14880-94
references.pmid: 19687967
references.citation: IEEE Trans Image Process. 2002;11(11):1260-70
references.pmid: 18249696
references.citation: Biomed Opt Express. 2011 Jun 1;2(6):1524-38
references.pmid: 21698016
references.citation: Opt Express. 2010 Apr 12;18(8):8338-52
references.pmid: 20588679
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Dec;36(13):2557-67
references.pmid: 7499078
references.citation: IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1986 Jun;8(6):679-98
references.pmid: 21869365
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2003 Apr;8(2):260-3
references.pmid: 12683852
references.citation: Science. 1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1178-81
references.pmid: 1957169
references.citation: Opt Express. 2009 Mar 16;17(6):4842-58
references.pmid: 19293916
references.citation: Opt Express. 2009 Jan 19;17(2):733-46
references.pmid: 19158887
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2004 Jan-Feb;9(1):47-74
references.pmid: 14715057
references.citation: Opt Express. 2007 May 14;15(10):6200-9
references.pmid: 19546925
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2005 Nov-Dec;10(6):064034
references.pmid: 16409099
references.citation: J Am Optom Assoc. 1998 Mar;69(3):180-7
references.pmid: 9553332
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 1999 Jan;4(1):95-105
references.pmid: 23015175
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;125(8):1027-35
references.pmid: 17698748
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Aug;51(8):4054-9
references.pmid: 20237244
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2004 Jan-Feb;9(1):94-102
references.pmid: 14715060
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Apr;51(4):1918-26
references.pmid: 19892869
references.citation: J Microsc. 2008 Jan;229(Pt 1):21-31
references.pmid: 18173641
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2003 Jul;8(3):565-9
references.pmid: 12880365
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 1996 Apr;1(2):157-73
references.pmid: 23014682
references.citation: Exp Eye Res. 2010 Sep;91(3):326-35
references.pmid: 20599432
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Dec;112(12):1584-9
references.pmid: 7993214
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Mar;22(3):323-31
references.pmid: 12760550
references.citation: Ophthalmic Res. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):270-6
references.pmid: 15583433