title: Antiscatter grid use in pediatric digital tomosynthesis imaging.
abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of antiscatter grid use on tomosynthesis image quality. We performed an observer study that rated the image quality of digital tomosynthesis scout radiographs and slice images of a Leeds TO.20 contrast-detail test object embedded in acrylic with and without a grid. We considered 10, 15, 20 and 25 cm of acrylic to represent the wide range of patient thicknesses encountered in pediatric imaging. We also acquired and rated images without a grid at an increased patient dose. The readers counted the total number of visible details in each image as a measure of relative image quality. We observed that the antiscatter grid improves tomosynthesis image quality compared to the grid-out case, which received image quality scores similar to grid-in radiography. Our results suggest that, in order to achieve the best image quality in exchange for the increase in patient dose, it may often be appropriate to include an antiscatter grid for pediatric tomosynthesis imaging, particularly if the patient thickness is greater than 10 cm.
authors.affiliation: Division of Medical Physics, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
authors.forename: Jenna M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: King
authors.forename: Idris A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Elbakri
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Reed
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D012542:Scattering, Radiation; D014056:Tomography, X-Ray / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul;195(1):161-7
references.pmid: 20566811
references.citation: Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4425-32
references.pmid: 19928073
references.citation: Med Phys. 1992 Mar-Apr;19(2):475-81
references.pmid: 1584148
references.citation: Med Phys. 2006 Jan;33(1):187-97
references.pmid: 16485425
references.citation: Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4298-306
references.pmid: 20879590
references.citation: Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5480-7
references.pmid: 20095260
references.citation: Pediatr Radiol. 2009 Feb;39 Suppl 1:S4-26
references.pmid: 19083224
references.citation: Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008 Jun;20(3):243-7
references.pmid: 18475090
references.citation: Med Phys. 1990 Jul-Aug;17(4):655-64
references.pmid: 2215411
references.citation: Med Phys. 2003 Jul;30(7):1712-8
references.pmid: 12906188
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84
references.pmid: 18046031
references.citation: Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):153-8
references.pmid: 20233755
references.citation: Med Phys. 2009 Jun;36(6):1956-67
references.pmid: 19610284
references.citation: Med Phys. 2007 Feb;34(2):547-55
references.pmid: 17388172