title: Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction.
abstract: Ideal free distribution (IFD) models predict that animals distribute themselves such that no individual can increase its fitness by moving to another patch. Many empirical tests assume that the interference among animals is independent of density and do not quantify the effects of density on fitness traits. Using two species of predatory mites, we measured oviposition as a function of conspecific density. Subsequently, we used these functions to calculate expected distributions on two connected patches. We performed an experimental test of the distributions of mites on two such connected patches, among which one had a food accessibility rate that was twice as high as on the other. For one of the two species, Iphiseius degenerans, the distribution matched the expected distribution. The distribution also coincided with the ratio of food accessibility. The other species, Neoseiulus cucumeris, distributed itself differently than expected. However, the oviposition rates of both species did not differ significantly from the expected oviposition rates based on experiments on single patches. This suggests that the oviposition rate of N. cucumeris was not negatively affected by the observed distribution, despite the fact that N. cucumeris did not match the predicted distributions. Thus, the distribution of one mite species, I. degenerans, was in agreement with IFD theory, whereas for the other mite species, N. cucumeris, unknown factors may have influenced the distribution of the mites. We conclude that density-dependent fitness traits provide essential information for explaining animal distributions.
authors.affiliation: University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. tessa.vanderhammen@wur.nl
authors.forename: Tessa
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: van der Hammen
authors.forename: Marta
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Montserrat
authors.forename: Maurice W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Sabelis
authors.forename: André M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: de Roos
authors.forename: Arne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Janssen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017753:Ecosystem; D005716:Game Theory; D008925:Mites / Q000502:physiology*; D008954:Models, Biological; D010058:Oviposition; D011156:Population Density; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012098:Reproduction; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal
references.citation: Oecologia. 2002 Mar;131(1):20-26
references.pmid: 28547506
references.citation: Oecologia. 2010 Jun;163(2):335-40
references.pmid: 20354730
references.citation: Monogr Popul Biol. 1972;5:1-217
references.pmid: 4680650
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 7;273(1604):2917-24
references.pmid: 17015363
references.citation: Nature. 1969 Sep 13;223(5211):1133-7
references.pmid: 5810684
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Feb;7(2):50-5
references.pmid: 21235950
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Apr;9(2):129-36
references.pmid: 1273796
references.citation: Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):446-449
references.pmid: 28307860