title: Adaptive behaviour, tri-trophic food-web stability and damping of chaos.
abstract: We examine the effect of adaptive foraging behaviour within a tri-trophic food web with intra-guild predation. The intra-guild prey is allowed to adjust its foraging effort so as to achieve an optimal per capita growth rate in the face of realized feeding, predation risk and foraging cost. Adaptive fitness-seeking behaviour of the intra-guild prey has a stabilizing effect on the tri-trophic food-web dynamics provided that (i) a finite optimal foraging effort exists and (ii) the trophic transfer efficiency from resource to predator via the intra-guild prey is greater than that from the resource directly. The latter condition is a general criterion for the feasibility of intra-guild predation as a trophic mode. Under these conditions, we demonstrate rigorously that adaptive behaviour will always promote stability of community dynamics in the sense that the region of parameter space in which stability is achieved is larger than for the non-adaptive counterpart of the system.
authors.affiliation: Department of Marine Ecology and Aquaculture, National Institute for Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kavalergaarden 6, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark. awv@aqua.dtu.dk
authors.forename: André W
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Visser
authors.forename: Patrizio
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mariani
authors.forename: Simone
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Pigolotti
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003198:Computer Simulation; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D020387:Food Chain; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Science. 1971 Jan 29;171(3969):385-7
references.pmid: 5538935
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Sep;89(9):2436-45
references.pmid: 18831165
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2005 Sep;18(5):1162-5
references.pmid: 16135105
references.citation: Am Nat. 2000 Feb;155(2):200-218
references.pmid: 10686161
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 May;7(5):151-4
references.pmid: 21235990
references.citation: Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):747-50
references.pmid: 19661430
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 2003 Jun;63(4):269-79
references.pmid: 12742173
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Mar;88(3):612-7
references.pmid: 17503589
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Sep 1;13(9):350-5
references.pmid: 21238339
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 2005 Mar;67(2):85-99
references.pmid: 15713322
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 2007 Sep;72(2):264-73
references.pmid: 17573086
references.citation: Am Nat. 2001 Sep;158(3):259-76
references.pmid: 18707323
references.citation: Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1388-91
references.pmid: 12610303
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jan;78(1):253-69
references.pmid: 19120606