title: Use of the Twin Design to Examine Evocative Gene-Environment Effects within a Conversational Context.
abstract: The purpose of this study was to highlight the role of twin designs in understanding children's conversational interactions. Specifically, we (a) attempted to replicate the findings of genetic effects on children's conversational language use reported in DeThorne et al. (2008), and (b) examined whether the language used by examiners in their conversation with twins reflected differences in the children's genetic similarity. Behavioral genetic analyses included intraclass correlations and model fitting procedures applied to 514 same-sex twins (202 MZ, 294 DZ, 10 unknown zygosity) from the Western Reserve Reading Project (Petrill, Deater-Deckard, Thompson, DeThorne, & Schatschneider, 2006). Analyses focused on child and examiner measures of talkativeness, average utterance length, vocabulary diversity, and grammatical complexity from a fifteen-minute conversational exchange. Substantial genetic effects on children's conversational language measures replicated results from DeThorne et al. (2008) using an expanded sample. However, no familiality was reflected in the examiner language measures. Modest phenotypic correlations between child and examiner language measures suggested that differences in examiner language use may elicit differences in child language use, but evidence of evocative rGE in which genetic differences across children evoke differences in examiner language use, was not found. The discussion focuses on a comparison of findings to previous studies and implications for future research.
authors.affiliation: Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign;
authors.forename: Laura Segebart
authors.initials: LS
authors.lastname: Dethorne
authors.forename: Sara Ann
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Hart
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 12;335(11):783-9
references.pmid: 8703183
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 May;108(2):315-325
references.pmid: 10369042
references.citation: J Learn Disabil. 2006 Jan-Feb;39(1):48-55
references.pmid: 16512082
references.citation: J Reprod Med. 1992 Aug;37(8):661-6
references.pmid: 1432978
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr;51(2):423-35
references.pmid: 18367687
references.citation: Cognition. 2006 Sep;101(2):333-84
references.pmid: 16797523
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1977 Mar;84(2):309-22
references.pmid: 557211
references.citation: J Speech Hear Disord. 1977 Nov;42(4):474-82
references.pmid: 916640
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Oct;34(5):982-8
references.pmid: 1749252
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Mar;143(3):279-89
references.pmid: 3953861
references.citation: Brain. 2003 Jan;126(Pt 1):5-19
references.pmid: 12477693
references.citation: Child Dev. 1992 Feb;63(1):1-19
references.pmid: 1343618
references.citation: Child Dev. 1999 Sep-Oct;70(5):1151-62
references.pmid: 10546338
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Dec;39(6):1258-62
references.pmid: 8959610
references.citation: Behav Genet. 1984 Jul;14(4):325-43
references.pmid: 6542356
references.citation: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;44(3):326-41
references.pmid: 12635964
references.citation: Child Dev. 1983 Apr;54(2):424-35
references.pmid: 6683622
references.citation: Twin Res. 1999 Dec;2(4):291-292
references.pmid: 10808244
references.citation: Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 May;16(2):119-27
references.pmid: 17456890
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 20;104(47):18860-5
references.pmid: 17984066
references.citation: Behav Genet. 1997 Mar;27(2):113-20
references.pmid: 9145549
references.citation: Twin Res. 2002 Dec;5(6):554-71
references.pmid: 12573187
references.citation: Child Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;71(2):468-84
references.pmid: 10834478
references.citation: J Pediatr. 2002 Jan;140(1):48-56
references.pmid: 11815763