title: Generation of tactile maps for artificial skin.
abstract: Prior research has shown that representations of retinal surfaces can be learned from the intrinsic structure of visual sensory data in neural simulations, in robots, as well as by animals. Furthermore, representations of cochlear (frequency) surfaces can be learned from auditory data in neural simulations. Advances in hardware technology have allowed the development of artificial skin for robots, realising a new sensory modality which differs in important respects from vision and audition in its sensorimotor characteristics. This provides an opportunity to further investigate ordered sensory map formation using computational tools. We show that it is possible to learn representations of non-trivial tactile surfaces, which require topologically and geometrically involved three-dimensional embeddings. Our method automatically constructs a somatotopic map corresponding to the configuration of tactile sensors on a rigid body, using only intrinsic properties of the tactile data. The additional complexities involved in processing the tactile modality require the development of a novel multi-dimensional scaling algorithm. This algorithm, ANISOMAP, extends previous methods and outperforms them, producing high-quality reconstructions of tactile surfaces in both simulation and hardware tests. In addition, the reconstruction turns out to be robust to unanticipated hardware failure.
authors.affiliation: University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: McGregor
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Polani
authors.forename: Kerstin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Dautenhahn
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D003198:Computer Simulation; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology; D012879:Skin Physiological Phenomena; D017768:Skin, Artificial; D014110:Touch / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 06;10:6
references.pmid: 19126227
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004 Oct;23(2):462-72
references.pmid: 15488396
references.citation: J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1963 Oct;56:872-6
references.pmid: 14050177
references.citation: Science. 1990 Nov 9;250(4982):818-20
references.pmid: 2237432
references.citation: Neural Comput. 1998 Nov 15;10(8):1983-5
references.pmid: 9804668
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 14;27(7):1746-55
references.pmid: 17301182
references.citation: Science. 2000 Dec 22;290(5500):2319-23
references.pmid: 11125149
references.citation: Neural Comput. 2003 Sep;15(9):2029-49
references.pmid: 12959664
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2007;164:425-45
references.pmid: 17920445
references.citation: Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1118-21
references.pmid: 17110570