title: Behavioral plasticity in an invaded system: non-native whelks recognize risk from native crabs.
abstract: Inducible defenses have the potential to affect both invasion success and the structure of invaded communities. However, little is known about the cues used for risk-recognition that influence the expression of inducible defenses in invasive prey, because they involve a novel threat. In laboratory experiments, we investigated behavioral defenses induced by a native crab on two invasive oyster drills (marine whelks Urosalpinx cinerea and Ocinebrina inornata). Both drills hid more often and reduced their feeding rates when they detected predators consuming conspecific prey. Examination of the responses of U. cinerea to specific cue sources (predator kairomones, conspecific alarm cues) indicated that this species had the strongest responses to cues from injured conspecifics, but that it did recognize the novel crab predator. Our observation of native predator (per se) recognition by an invasive marine prey is novel. In addition, we observed that neither species of drill reduced their defensive behavior to reflect predation risk shared by a group of prey. The lack of density dependence in risk-assessment could cause populations of invasive prey to transmit both quantitatively and qualitatively different community effects over the course of an invasion as abundance changes. Together, these findings demonstrate several ways that the risk-assessment strategies could be important in establishment and post-establishment dynamics of invasive prey.
authors.affiliation: Biology Department, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA. egrason@u.washington.edu
authors.forename: Emily W
authors.initials: EW
authors.lastname: Grason
authors.forename: Benjamin G
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Miner
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000187:drug effects; D003386:Brachyura / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D049851:Gastropoda / Q000502:physiology*; D058865:Introduced Species; D010675:Pheromones / Q000494:pharmacology; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D012306:Risk
chemical_list: D010675:Pheromones
references.citation: Q Rev Biol. 1990 Sep;65(3):323-40
references.pmid: 2236483
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2008 Nov;77(6):1092-8
references.pmid: 18624744
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Feb;88(2):402-12
references.pmid: 17479758
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1999 Aug;58(2):443-451
references.pmid: 10458896
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 May 22;276(1663):1865-73
references.pmid: 19324783
references.citation: Oecologia. 2006 Jul;148(4):593-601
references.pmid: 16532333
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Oct;88(10):2555-62
references.pmid: 18027758
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2006 Mar;32(3):605-19
references.pmid: 16586040
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 Jun;90(6):1659-69
references.pmid: 19569380
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):505-12
references.pmid: 21352454
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 Oct;153(4):871-8
references.pmid: 17636335
references.citation: Oecologia. 2009 Jun;160(3):563-75
references.pmid: 19352719
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Dec;87(12):2979-84
references.pmid: 17249221
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Nov;9(11):1245-52
references.pmid: 17040327
references.citation: Oecologia. 2004 Sep;141(1):139-47
references.pmid: 15338267
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1973 Feb;38(2):419-22
references.pmid: 4734745
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(12):4387-91
references.pmid: 16593946
references.citation: Oecologia. 1999 May;119(2):159-165
references.pmid: 28307964
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Sep 1;13(9):350-5
references.pmid: 21238339