title: Quantitative evaluation of scintillation camera imaging characteristics of isotopes used in liver radioembolization.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Scintillation camera imaging is used for treatment planning and post-treatment dosimetry in liver radioembolization (RE). In yttrium-90 (90Y) RE, scintigraphic images of technetium-99m (99mTc) are used for treatment planning, while 90Y Bremsstrahlung images are used for post-treatment dosimetry. In holmium-166 (166Ho) RE, scintigraphic images of 166Ho can be used for both treatment planning and post-treatment dosimetry. The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate and compare the imaging characteristics of these three isotopes, in order that imaging protocols can be optimized and RE studies with varying isotopes can be compared.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Phantom experiments were performed in line with NEMA guidelines to assess the spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate linearity, and contrast recovery of 99mTc, 90Y and 166Ho. In addition, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to obtain detailed information about the history of detected photons. The results showed that the use of a broad energy window and the high-energy collimator gave optimal combination of sensitivity, spatial resolution, and primary photon fraction for 90Y Bremsstrahlung imaging, although differences with the medium-energy collimator were small. For 166Ho, the high-energy collimator also slightly outperformed the medium-energy collimator. In comparison with 99mTc, the image quality of both 90Y and 166Ho is degraded by a lower spatial resolution, a lower sensitivity, and larger scatter and collimator penetration fractions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The quantitative evaluation of the scintillation camera characteristics presented in this study helps to optimize acquisition parameters and supports future analysis of clinical comparisons between RE studies.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.elschot@umcutrecht.nl
authors.forename: Mattijs
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Elschot
authors.forename: Johannes Franciscus Wilhelmus
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Nijsen
authors.forename: Alida Johanna
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Dam
authors.forename: Hugo Wilhelmus Antonius Maria
authors.initials: HW
authors.lastname: de Jong
mesh_terms: D004621:Embolization, Therapeutic; D015902:Gamma Cameras; D006801:Humans; D007554:Isotopes; D008099:Liver / Q000378:metabolism*; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D007554:Isotopes; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals
references.citation: Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2009 Feb;24(1):145-54
references.pmid: 19243257
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 1997 Aug;70(836):823-8
references.pmid: 9486047
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Nov 21;53(22):6591-603
references.pmid: 18978442
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1992 Jan;33(1):161-6
references.pmid: 1730984
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Oct 21;53(20):5689-703
references.pmid: 18812648
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2005 Jan;53(1):76-84
references.pmid: 15690505
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2010 Dec;51(12):1969-73
references.pmid: 21078802
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Nov;34(11):1887
references.pmid: 17846767
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):951-9
references.pmid: 18989675
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2010 Jun;51(6):921-8
references.pmid: 20484423
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar 7;52(5):1527-45
references.pmid: 17301469
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Jul;35(7):1259-71
references.pmid: 18330569
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Oct 7;54(19):5873-83
references.pmid: 19759410
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med. 1997 Mar;24(3):293-8
references.pmid: 9143467
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Aug;37(9):1654-62
references.pmid: 20422185
references.citation: Am J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct;31(5):431-8
references.pmid: 18838878
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Oct;36(10):1696
references.pmid: 19618182
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2011 Jan;52(1):72-6
references.pmid: 21149493
references.citation: J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Jun 15;29:70
references.pmid: 20550679
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2006 Oct 7;51(19):4773-87
references.pmid: 16985270
references.citation: Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jun;9(3):253-62
references.pmid: 20441235
references.citation: Ann Nucl Med. 2009 May;23(3):257-67
references.pmid: 19326187
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):491-9
references.pmid: 15031432
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2008 Dec;60(6):1466-76
references.pmid: 19026005
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1994 Feb;39(2):265-79
references.pmid: 15552124
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med. 1999 Jul;26(7):699-704
references.pmid: 10398817
references.citation: Cancer J. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):163-75
references.pmid: 20404614
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2001 May;42(5):772-9
references.pmid: 11337575
references.citation: Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Jun;53(3):325-35
references.pmid: 19521312
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 7;53(17):4595-604
references.pmid: 18678930
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2010 Apr;20(4):862-9
references.pmid: 19789880
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1994 Aug;35(8):1381-9
references.pmid: 8046498
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2011 Jul;52(7):1063-7
references.pmid: 21680693
references.citation: Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2943-50
references.pmid: 20632606
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1975 Apr;16(4):284-8
references.pmid: 1113185
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2007 Jul;142(7):675-82
references.pmid: 17638807