title: Composition and hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification performance of grasses and legumes from a mixed-species prairie.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Mixtures of prairie species (mixed prairie species; MPS) have been proposed to offer important advantages as a feedstock for sustainable production of fuels and chemicals. Therefore, understanding the performance in hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of select species harvested from a mixed prairie is valuable in selecting these components for such applications. This study examined composition and sugar release from the most abundant components of a plot of MPS: a C3 grass (Poa pratensis), a C4 grass (Schizachyrium scoparium), and a legume (Lupinus perennis). Results from this study provide a platform to evaluate differences between grass and leguminous species, and the factors controlling their recalcitrance to pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Significant differences were found between the grass and leguminous species, and between the individual anatomical components that influence the recalcitrance of MPS. We found that both grasses contained higher levels of sugars than did the legume, and also exhibited higher sugar yields as a percentage of the maximum possible from combined pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Furthermore, particle size, acid-insoluble residue (AcIR), and xylose removal were not found to have a direct significant effect on glucan digestibility for any of the species tested, whereas anatomical composition was a key factor in both grass and legume recalcitrance, with the stems consistently exhibiting higher recalcitrance than the other anatomical fractions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The prairie species tested in this study responded well to hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification. Information from this study supports recommendations as to which plant types and species are more desirable for biological conversion in a mixture of prairie species, in addition to identifying fractions of the plants that would most benefit from genetic modification or targeted growth.
authors.affiliation: Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92507, USA. charles.wyman@ucr.edu.
authors.forename: Jaclyn D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Demartini
authors.forename: Charles E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Wyman
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 Feb;108(2):306-12
references.pmid: 20830680
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jun 1;97(2):265-78
references.pmid: 17163513
references.citation: Science. 1991 Mar 15;251(4999):1318-23
references.pmid: 17816186
references.citation: J Nutr. 1997 May;127(5 Suppl):814S-818S
references.pmid: 9164243
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Jul;25(7):759-61
references.pmid: 17572667
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1598-600
references.pmid: 17158327
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008 Mar;145(1-3):13-21
references.pmid: 18425607
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Apr 5;86(1):88-95
references.pmid: 15007845
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000 Spring;84-86:5-37
references.pmid: 10849776
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Feb 1;96(2):219-31
references.pmid: 16903002
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010 Feb 1;105(2):231-8
references.pmid: 19731251
references.citation: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009 Nov 24;2(1):29
references.pmid: 19930679
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2004 May;92(3):269-74
references.pmid: 14766160
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2005 Spring;121-124:163-70
references.pmid: 15917596
references.citation: Biotechnol Prog. 1999 Oct 1;15(5):804-816
references.pmid: 10514250
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jan 27;311(5760):506-8
references.pmid: 16439656