title: Hydrothermal pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse using response surface methodology improves digestibility and ethanol production by SSF.
abstract: Sugarcane bagasse was characterized as a feedstock for the production of ethanol using hydrothermal pretreatment. Reaction temperature and time were varied between 160 and 200°C and 5-20 min, respectively, using a response surface experimental design. The liquid fraction was analyzed for soluble carbohydrates and furan aldehydes. The solid fraction was analyzed for structural carbohydrates and Klason lignin. Pretreatment conditions were evaluated based on enzymatic extraction of glucose and xylose and conversion to ethanol using a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation scheme. SSF experiments were conducted with the washed pretreated biomass. The severity of the pretreatment should be sufficient to drive enzymatic digestion and ethanol yields, however, sugars losses and especially sugar conversion into furans needs to be minimized. As expected, furfural production increased with pretreatment severity and specifically xylose release. However, provided that the severity was kept below a general severity factor of 4.0, production of furfural was below an inhibitory concentration and carbohydrate contents were preserved in the pretreated whole hydrolysate. There were significant interactions between time and temperature for all the responses except cellulose digestion. The models were highly predictive for cellulose digestibility (R                         (2) = 0.8861) and for ethanol production (R                         (2) = 0.9581), but less so for xylose extraction. Both cellulose digestion and ethanol production increased with severity, however, high levels of furfural generated under more severe pretreatment conditions favor lower severity pretreatments. The optimal pretreatment condition that gave the highest conversion yield of ethanol, while minimizing furfural production, was judged to be 190°C and 17.2 min. The whole hydrolysate was also converted to ethanol using SSF. To reduce the concentration of inhibitors, the liquid fraction was conditioned prior to fermentation by removing inhibitory chemicals using the fungus Coniochaeta ligniaria.
authors.affiliation: Department of Agri-food Industry, Food and Nutrition, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil. shcruz@usp.br
authors.forename: Sandra Helena
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: da Cruz
authors.forename: Bruce S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Dien
authors.forename: Nancy N
authors.initials: NN
authors.lastname: Nichols
authors.forename: Badal C
authors.initials: BC
authors.lastname: Saha
authors.forename: Michael A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Cotta
mesh_terms: D018533:Biomass; D019149:Bioreactors; D001709:Biotechnology; D002241:Carbohydrates; D002482:Cellulose / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism; D000431:Ethanol / Q000378:metabolism*; D005285:Fermentation; D005662:Furaldehyde / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism; D005947:Glucose / Q000378:metabolism; D008031:Lignin / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D031786:Saccharum / Q000737:chemistry*; D013696:Temperature; D014994:Xylose / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D002241:Carbohydrates; D000431:Ethanol; D002482:Cellulose; D008031:Lignin; C027433:bagasse; D014994:Xylose; D005662:Furaldehyde; D005947:Glucose
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Sep;38(9):1193-202
references.pmid: 21107642
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(13):4820-5
references.pmid: 20022746
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2004 Spring;113-116:937-49
references.pmid: 15054243
references.citation: Trends Biotechnol. 2005 Jan;23(1):22-7
references.pmid: 15629854
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2011 Feb;102(3):2651-8
references.pmid: 21109425
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2002 Jan;81(1):33-44
references.pmid: 11708754
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2005 Spring;121-124:379-90
references.pmid: 15917615
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(13):4851-61
references.pmid: 20042329
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2010 Oct;101(19):7545-50
references.pmid: 20510606
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Jul;38(7):809-17
references.pmid: 20740373
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Mar;64(1):125-31
references.pmid: 12908085
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2003 Spring;105 -108:69-85
references.pmid: 12721476
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Sep;38(9):1467-75
references.pmid: 21210180
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(13):4754-66
references.pmid: 19945863