title: The role of magnocellular signals in oculomotor attentional capture.
abstract: While it is known that salient distractors often capture covert and overt attention, it is unclear whether salience signals that stem from magnocellular visual input have a more dominant role in oculomotor capture than those that result from parvocellular input. Because of the direct anatomical connections between the magnocellular pathway and the superior colliculus, salience signals generated from the magnocellular pathway may produce greater oculomotor capture than those from the parvocellular pathway, which could be potentially harder to overcome with "top-down," goal-directed guidance. Although previous research has addressed this with regard to magnocellular transients, in the current research, we investigated whether a static singleton distractor defined along a dimension visible to the magnocellular pathway would also produce enhanced oculomotor capture. In two experiments, we addressed this possibility by comparing a parvo-biased singleton condition, in which the distractor was defined by isoluminant chromatic color contrast, with a magno + parvo singleton condition, in which the distractor also differed in luminance from the surrounding objects. In both experiments, magno + parvo singletons elicited faster eye movements than parvo-only singletons, presumably reflecting faster information transmission in the magnocellular pathway, but magno + parvo singletons were not significantly more likely to produce oculomotor capture. Thus, although magnocellular salience signals are available more rapidly, they have no sizable advantage over parvocellular salience signals in controlling oculomotor orienting when all stimuli have a common onset.
authors.affiliation: Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. cjleonard@ucdavis.edu
authors.forename: Carly J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Leonard
authors.forename: Steven J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Luck
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D013477:Superior Colliculi / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):910-28
references.pmid: 16334062
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Dec;25(6):1595-608
references.pmid: 10641312
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1997 Jun;33(1):64-87
references.pmid: 9212722
references.citation: Vision Res. 1990;30(7):1069-75
references.pmid: 2392835
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Aug;10(8):382-90
references.pmid: 16843702
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Apr;43(4):346-54
references.pmid: 3362663
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):485-96
references.pmid: 8008550
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):180-4
references.pmid: 11934005
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:127-53
references.pmid: 10845061
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
references.pmid: 11994752
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):371-84
references.pmid: 7786857
references.citation: Vision Res. 1991;31(1):119-30
references.pmid: 2006545
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):601-21
references.pmid: 6238122
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Oct;5(10):995-1002
references.pmid: 12219097
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(6):433-41
references.pmid: 1944854
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):1050-67
references.pmid: 14585022
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jul;57(5):637-44
references.pmid: 7644324
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):427-32
references.pmid: 12930472
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1980;3:189-226
references.pmid: 6774653
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Feb;13(2):261-6
references.pmid: 20023651
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2002 Jun 1;22(11):4675-85
references.pmid: 12040074
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2003 Jul;65(5):735-46
references.pmid: 12956581
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;79(6):3272-8
references.pmid: 9636126
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1443-58
references.pmid: 10788651
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 2;31(5):1570-8
references.pmid: 21289164
references.citation: Science. 1988 May 6;240(4853):740-9
references.pmid: 3283936
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):132-8
references.pmid: 16724780
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Aug;20(4):799-806
references.pmid: 8083635
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Mar;9(2):238-53
references.pmid: 23962014
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Feb;20(1):95-107
references.pmid: 8133227
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Aug 29;357(1424):1073-82
references.pmid: 12217175
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1993 Dec 8;338(2):289-303
references.pmid: 8308173