title: Bacterial community profiles from sediments of the Anacostia River using metabolic and molecular analyses.
abstract: BACKGROUND AIM AND SCOPE: Though the tidal Anacostia River, a highly polluted riverine system, has been well characterized with regard to contaminants, its overall resident bacterial populations have remained largely unknown. Improving the health of this system will rely upon enhanced understanding of the diversity and functions of these communities. Bacterial DNA was extracted from archived (AR, year 2000) and fresh sediments (RE, year 2006) collected from various locations within the Anacostia River. Using a combination of metabolic and molecular techniques, community snapshots of sediment bacterial diversity and activity were produced.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Employing Biolog EcoPlates, metabolic analysis of RE sediments from July revealed similar utilization of amines, amino acids, carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, and polymers at all sites. Normalized optical density measurements demonstrated that for most compounds, utilizations were similar though when differences did occur, the downstream site was enhanced compared to one or both of the upstream sites. Using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, bacterial diversity fingerprints of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained. Dendograms of the banding patterns revealed qualitative relationships as well as differences between replicate samples from similar sites. Replicates from the AR sites shared several common OTUs, while RE sites were more varied. Species richness and Shannon diversity indices generally increased with increasingly downstream locations, and were significant for the AR sediments (analysis of variance, P < 0.0001). Carbon and nitrogen content and concentration of fine grain sediment (<63 μm) were positively correlated with OTU richness (r (2) = 0.37, P = 0.0008; r (2) = 0.45, P < 0.0001; r (2) = 0.48, P = 0.001, respectively).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study demonstrated that the bacterial communities from all regions sampled were not only metabolically active with the capacity to utilize several different compounds as energy sources but also were genetically diverse. This study is the first to focus on the overall bacterial community, providing insight into this vital component of stream ecosystems. Understanding the bacterial components of aquatic systems such as the Anacostia River will increase our knowledge of the overall structure and function of the ecological communities in polluted systems, subsequently enhancing our ability to improve the health of this important tidal river.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology and Natural Sciences, Northern Virginia Community College, 8333 Little River Turnpike, Annandale, VA 22003, USA. kbushaw@nvcc.edu
authors.forename: Karen L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Bushaw-Newton
authors.forename: Evan C
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: Ewers
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Velinsky
authors.forename: Jeffrey T F
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Ashley
authors.forename: Stephen E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Macavoy
mesh_terms: D001419:Bacteria / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification* / Q000378:metabolism*; D044822:Biodiversity; D002244:Carbon / Q000378:metabolism; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000032:analysis / Q000235:genetics; D058645:Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis; D004219:District of Columbia; D014644:Genetic Variation; D019015:Geologic Sediments / Q000737:chemistry / Q000382:microbiology*; D008396:Maryland; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000378:metabolism; D010802:Phylogeny; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000032:analysis / Q000235:genetics; D045483:Rivers / Q000737:chemistry / Q000382:microbiology*
chemical_list: D004269:DNA, Bacterial; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; D002244:Carbon; D009584:Nitrogen
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Aug;70(8):4800-6
references.pmid: 15294817
references.citation: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1993 Oct;51(4):582-7
references.pmid: 8400662
references.citation: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010 Apr;58(3):551-61
references.pmid: 20098984
references.citation: J Environ Monit. 2009 Sep;11(9):1622-8
references.pmid: 19724831
references.citation: Can J Microbiol. 2009 Mar;55(3):333-46
references.pmid: 19370077
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Feb;62(2):340-6
references.pmid: 8593039
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1999 Dec 1;30(4):333-343
references.pmid: 10568842
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Mar;59(3):695-700
references.pmid: 7683183
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Feb;59(2):466-75
references.pmid: 17313586
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Sep;65(3):494-503
references.pmid: 18616580
references.citation: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008 Jan;54(1):114-22
references.pmid: 17763889
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Sep;156(1-4):51-67
references.pmid: 18677546
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;2(3):317-22
references.pmid: 10383868
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2008 May;10(5):1296-309
references.pmid: 18312399
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;10(4):942-9
references.pmid: 18218033
references.citation: J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2008 May;43(6):567-75
references.pmid: 18393063
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004 Mar;23(3):638-47
references.pmid: 15285357
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Dec;183(1-4):307-28
references.pmid: 21404015
references.citation: J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2006;41(7):1327-46
references.pmid: 16854806
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Aug;57(8):2351-9
references.pmid: 16348543
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Apr;64(4):1220-5
references.pmid: 16349535