title: State of malaria diagnostic testing at clinical laboratories in the United States, 2010: a nationwide survey.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The diagnosis of malaria can be difficult in non-endemic areas, such as the United States, and delays in diagnosis and errors in treatment occur too often.
  
  
  METHODS
  A nationwide survey of laboratories in the United States and its nine dependent territories was conducted in 2010 to determine factors that may contribute to shortcomings in the diagnosis of malaria. This survey explored the availability of malaria diagnostic tests, techniques used, and reporting practices.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The survey was completed by 201 participants. Ninety percent reported that their laboratories had at least one type of malaria diagnostic test available on-site. Nearly all of the respondents' laboratories performed thick and thin smears on-site; approximately 50% had access to molecular testing; and only 17% had access to rapid diagnostic tests on-site. Seventy-three percent reported fewer than five confirmed cases of malaria in their laboratory during the 12-month period preceding the survey. Twenty-eight percent stated that results of species identification took more than 24 hours to report. Only five of 149 respondents that performed testing 24 hours a day, 7 days a week complied with all of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines for analysis and reporting of results.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although malaria diagnostic testing services were available to a majority of U.S. laboratories surveyed, very few were in complete compliance with all of the CLSI guidelines for analysis and reporting of results, and most respondents reported very few cases of malaria annually. Laboratories' difficulty in adhering to the rigorous CLSI guidelines and their personnel's lack of practice and proficiency may account for delays and errors in diagnosis. It is recommended that laboratories that infrequently process samples for malaria seek opportunities for practice and proficiency training annually and take advantage of available resources to assist in species identification.
authors.affiliation: Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston, 2015 Uppergate Drive NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. fabanyi@emory.edu
authors.forename: Francisca A
authors.initials: FA
authors.lastname: Abanyie
authors.forename: Paul M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Arguin
authors.forename: Julie
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gutman
mesh_terms: D019411:Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D003955:Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Q000379:methods*; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D008288:Malaria / Q000175:diagnosis*; D010274:Parasitology / Q000379:methods*; D014481:United States
references.citation: MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 May 26;55(4):23-37
references.pmid: 16723971
references.citation: Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;27(1):142-9
references.pmid: 9675468
references.citation: MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008 Jun 20;57(5):24-39
references.pmid: 18566568
references.citation: Mol Diagn Ther. 2008;12(5):299-306
references.pmid: 18803428
references.citation: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993 Apr;58(2):283-92
references.pmid: 8479452
references.citation: Parasitol Int. 2007 Mar;56(1):61-4
references.pmid: 17257891
references.citation: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000 Jan;124(1):57-60
references.pmid: 10629133
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 12;354(2):119-30
references.pmid: 16407507
references.citation: Malar J. 2007 Feb 21;6:19
references.pmid: 17313669
references.citation: MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Jun 8;56(6):23-40
references.pmid: 17557074
references.citation: Malar J. 2010 Dec 13;9:359
references.pmid: 21144034
references.citation: J Clin Pathol. 1994 Aug;47(8):740-2
references.pmid: 7962629
references.citation: MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010 Jun 25;59(7):1-15
references.pmid: 20577158