title: Global trends in milk quality: implications for the Irish dairy industry.
abstract: The quality of Irish agricultural product will become increasingly important with the ongoing liberalisation of international trade. This paper presents a review of the global and Irish dairy industries; considers the impact of milk quality on farm profitability, food processing and human health, examines global trends in quality; and explores several models that are successfully being used to tackle milk quality concerns. There is a growing global demand for dairy products, fuelled in part by growing consumer wealth in developing countries. Global dairy trade represents only 6.2% of global production and demand currently outstrips supply. Although the Irish dairy industry is small by global standards, approximately 85% of annual production is exported annually. It is also the world's largest producer of powdered infant formula. Milk quality has an impact on human health, milk processing and on-farm profitability. Somatic cell count (SCC) is a key measure of milk quality, with a SCC not exceeding 400,000 cells/ml (the EU milk quality standard) generally accepted as the international export standard. There have been ongoing improvements in milk quality among both established and emerging international suppliers. A number of countries have developed successful industry-led models to tackle milk quality concerns. Based on international experiences, it is likely that problems with effective translation of knowledge to practice, rather than incomplete knowledge per se, are the more important constraints to national progress towards improved milk quality.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, UCD School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. simon.more@ucd.ie.
authors.forename: Sj
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: More
references.citation: Ir Vet J. 2007 Sep 01;60(9):540-5
references.pmid: 21851699
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2000 Dec;83(12):2782-8
references.pmid: 11132847
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2006 Apr;89(4):1207-21
references.pmid: 16537954
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Oct 01;337:a1890
references.pmid: 18829644
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2000 Feb;83(2):264-74
references.pmid: 10714859
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 1998 May;81(5):1205-13
references.pmid: 9621221
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2006 Oct;89(10):4083-93
references.pmid: 16960086
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Oct 25;372(9648):1444-5
references.pmid: 18970965
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2007 Sep;90(9):4466-77
references.pmid: 17699068
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2001 Feb;84(2):370-4
references.pmid: 11233021
references.citation: Vet Q. 2007 Mar;29(1):18-31
references.pmid: 17471788
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2002 Apr;85(4):782-9
references.pmid: 12018423
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2000 Dec;83(12):2805-9
references.pmid: 11132850
references.citation: Vet Rec. 2007 Mar 3;160(9):287-93
references.pmid: 17337605
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2008 Mar;91(3):1236-44
references.pmid: 18292282
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2006 Apr;89(4):1179-88
references.pmid: 16537951
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 2006 Sep 15;76(1-2):74-89
references.pmid: 16780974
references.citation: Vet Res. 1998 Nov-Dec;29(6):497-510
references.pmid: 9851006
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2003 Aug;86(8):2491-503
references.pmid: 12939072
references.citation: Vet Rec. 1966 Apr 9;78(15):521-3
references.pmid: 6006045
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 1998 Jun;81(6):1545-54
references.pmid: 9684160
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 2003 Apr 30;58(1-2):15-24
references.pmid: 12628768
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2006 Mar;89 Suppl 1:E15-9
references.pmid: 16527874
references.citation: Can Vet J. 1982 Apr;23(4):119-25
references.pmid: 17422127