title: The effectiveness of updating metacognitive knowledge in the elderly: evidence from metamnemonic judgments of word frequency.
abstract: Accurate metacognitive knowledge is vital for optimal performance in self-regulated learning. Yet older adults have deficiencies in implementing effective learning strategies and knowledge updating and consequently may not learn as effectively from task experience as younger adults. Here we assess the ability of older adults to update metacognitive knowledge about the effects of word frequency on recognition. Young adults have been shown to correct their misconceptions through experience with the task, but the greater difficulty older adults have with knowledge updating makes it unclear whether task experience will be sufficient for older adults. The performance of older adults in this experiment qualitatively replicates the results of a comparison group of younger subjects, indicating that both groups are able to correct their metacognitive knowledge through task experience. Older adults seem to possess more effective and flexible metacognition than sometimes suggested.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. jtullis2@illinois.edu
authors.forename: Jonathan G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Tullis
authors.forename: Aaron S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Benjamin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology / Q000523:psychology*; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D019359:Knowledge; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D021641:Recognition, Psychology
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1170-87
references.pmid: 11009251
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2000 Sep;15(3):462-74
references.pmid: 11014709
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):174-9
references.pmid: 18605499
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Jul;18(4):681-90
references.pmid: 1385609
references.citation: Memory. 2008 Feb;16(2):125-36
references.pmid: 18286417
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):155-73
references.pmid: 18609379
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2011 Feb 1;64(2):109-118
references.pmid: 21516194
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2002 Dec;17(4):589-97
references.pmid: 12507356
references.citation: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2008 Sep;15(5):601-26
references.pmid: 18608048
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2011 Feb;39(2):196-203
references.pmid: 21264631
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1994 Jun;9(2):287-302
references.pmid: 8054177
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):469-86
references.pmid: 19883131
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):429-42
references.pmid: 23242770
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1988 Sep;3(3):249-57
references.pmid: 3268266
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):429-37
references.pmid: 18426071
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):632-52
references.pmid: 22103783
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2003 Mar;31(2):297-305
references.pmid: 12749471
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1998 Sep;26(5):951-8
references.pmid: 9796228
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1961 Jan;61:23-9
references.pmid: 13707272