title: Plasticity of preferred body temperatures as means of coping with climate change?
abstract: Thermoregulatory behaviour represents an important component of ectotherm non-genetic adaptive capacity that mitigates the impact of ongoing climate change. The buffering role of behavioural thermoregulation has been attributed solely to the ability to maintain near optimal body temperature for sufficiently extended periods under altered thermal conditions. The widespread occurrence of plastic modification of target temperatures that an ectotherm aims to achieve (preferred body temperatures) has been largely overlooked. I argue that plasticity of target temperatures may significantly contribute to an ectotherm's adaptive capacity. Its contribution to population persistence depends on both the effectiveness of acute thermoregulatory adjustments (reactivity) in buffering selection pressures in a changing thermal environment, and the total costs of thermoregulation (i.e. reactivity and plasticity) in a given environment. The direction and magnitude of plastic shifts in preferred body temperatures can be incorporated into mechanistic models, to improve predictions of the impact of global climate change on ectotherm populations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Population Biology, Institute of Vertebrate Biology AS CR, Koněšín, Czech Republic. gvozdik@brno.cas.cz
authors.forename: Lumír
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Gvozdík
mesh_terms: D000064:Acclimatization; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D001833:Body Temperature Regulation; D057231:Climate Change; D004777:Environment; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D013696:Temperature
references.citation: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2011 Mar-Apr;84(2):166-74
references.pmid: 21460527
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 22;277(1681):503-11
references.pmid: 19846457
references.citation: Evolution. 2002 Sep;56(9):1863-6
references.pmid: 12389732
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1387-96
references.pmid: 9632521
references.citation: Science. 1960 Feb 26;131(3400):610-1
references.pmid: 17775548
references.citation: J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2007 Aug 1;307(8):439-48
references.pmid: 17577200
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 10;106(10):3835-40
references.pmid: 19234117
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Feb 1;13(2):77-81
references.pmid: 21238209
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):1041-54
references.pmid: 20482574
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2002 Sep;205(Pt 18):2777-84
references.pmid: 12177143
references.citation: Science. 2010 May 14;328(5980):832-3
references.pmid: 20466909
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 7;276(1664):1939-48
references.pmid: 19324762
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Feb;155(1):1-10
references.pmid: 17985159
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2010 Apr 27;8(4):e1000357
references.pmid: 20463950
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1133:44-66
references.pmid: 18559815
references.citation: Science. 2010 May 14;328(5980):894-9
references.pmid: 20466932
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2008 Dec 23;6(12):2621-6
references.pmid: 19108608
references.citation: Am Nat. 2008 Jan;171(1):E1-E19
references.pmid: 18171140
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1975 Jan 1;50(1A):91-8
references.pmid: 234066