title: Dehydratase mediated 1-propanol production in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  With the increasing consumption of fossil fuels, the question of meeting the global energy demand is of great importance in the near future. As an effective solution, production of higher alcohols from renewable sources by microorganisms has been proposed to address both energy crisis and environmental concerns. Higher alcohols contain more than two carbon atoms and have better physiochemical properties than ethanol as fuel substitutes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We designed a novel 1-propanol metabolic pathway by expanding the well-known 1,2-propanediol pathway with two more enzymatic steps catalyzed by a 1,2-propanediol dehydratase and an alcohol dehydrogenase. In order to engineer the pathway into E. coli, we evaluated the activities of eight different methylglyoxal synthases which play crucial roles in shunting carbon flux from glycolysis towards 1-propanol biosynthesis, as well as two secondary alcohol dehydrogenases of different origins that reduce both methylglyoxal and hydroxyacetone. It is evident from our results that the most active enzymes are the methylglyoxal synthase from Bacillus subtilis and the secondary alcohol dehydrogenase from Klebsiella pneumoniae, encoded by mgsA and budC respectively. With the expression of these two genes and the E. coli ydjG encoding methylglyoxal reductase, we achieved the production of 1,2-propanediol at 0.8 g/L in shake flask experiments. We then characterized the catalytic efficiency of three different diol dehydratases on 1,2-propanediol and identified the optimal one as the 1,2-propanediol dehydratase from Klebsiella oxytoca, encoded by the operon ppdABC. Co-expressing this enzyme with the above 1,2-propanediol pathway in wild type E. coli resulted in the production of 1-propanol at a titer of 0.25 g/L.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We have successfully established a new pathway for 1-propanol production by shunting the carbon flux from glycolysis. To our knowledge, it is the first time that this pathway has been utilized to produce 1-propanol in E. coli. The work presented here forms a basis for further improvement in production. We speculate that dragging more carbon flux towards methylglyoxal by manipulating glycolytic pathway and eliminating competing pathways such as lactate generation can further enhance the production of 1-propanol.
authors.affiliation: Biochemical Engineering Program, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
authors.forename: Rachit
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Jain
authors.forename: Yajun
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Yan
mesh_terms: D000433:1-Propanol / Q000378:metabolism*; D001412:Bacillus subtilis / Q000201:enzymology* / Q000235:genetics; D053898:Biosynthetic Pathways; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000201:enzymology / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism*; D006836:Hydro-Lyases / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D007711:Klebsiella pneumoniae / Q000201:enzymology* / Q000235:genetics; D060847:Metabolic Engineering; D015202:Protein Engineering
chemical_list: D000433:1-Propanol; D006836:Hydro-Lyases
references.citation: J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:
references.pmid: 20827393
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Jan 3;451(7174):86-9
references.pmid: 18172501
references.citation: J Gen Microbiol. 1990 May;136(5):887-96
references.pmid: 2166132
references.citation: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008 Oct;19(5):414-9
references.pmid: 18761088
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Dec;74(24):7802-8
references.pmid: 18952866
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Jan;30(1):34-40
references.pmid: 12545384
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1996 Sep 13;271(37):22352-7
references.pmid: 8798396
references.citation: J Biosci Bioeng. 2010 Dec;110(6):696-701
references.pmid: 20696614
references.citation: J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Nov;18(11):1797-802
references.pmid: 19047824
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:137-81
references.pmid: 8905078
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1998 Jun 16;37(24):8754-63
references.pmid: 9628737
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Mar;65(3):1180-5
references.pmid: 10049880
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 2001 Sep;147(Pt 9):2437-2446
references.pmid: 11535784
references.citation: Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997 Nov 1;347(1):132-40
references.pmid: 9344474
references.citation: Biochemistry. 2004 Apr 27;43(16):4635-45
references.pmid: 15096031
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2008 Nov;10(6):305-11
references.pmid: 17942358
references.citation: Biochem J. 2006 Nov 15;400(1):105-14
references.pmid: 16813561
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 1971 Mar 16;13(4):213-216
references.pmid: 11945670
references.citation: Biotechnol Prog. 2000 Nov-Dec;16(6):940-6
references.pmid: 11101319
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5010-5
references.pmid: 12704244
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Jun;6(3):236-46
references.pmid: 12753973
references.citation: Biochem J. 1972 Jun;128(2):321-9
references.pmid: 4563643
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1980 Sep;143(3):1458-65
references.pmid: 6997273
references.citation: Biochem J. 1973 Apr;131(4):833-41
references.pmid: 4198624
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2008 Nov;10(6):312-20
references.pmid: 18775501
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Mar 15;25(6):1203-10
references.pmid: 9092630
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1974 Aug;119(2):357-62
references.pmid: 4604054