title: Attitudes of medical students to medical leadership and management: a systematic review to inform curriculum development.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is a growing acknowledgement that doctors need to develop leadership and management competences to become more actively involved in the planning, delivery and transformation of patient services. We undertook a systematic review of what is known concerning the knowledge, skills and attitudes of medical students regarding leadership and management. Here we report the results pertaining to the attitudes of students to provide evidence to inform curriculum development in this developing field of medical education.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched major electronic databases and citation indexes within the disciplines of medicine, education, social science and management. We undertook hand searching of major journals, and reference and citation tracking. We accessed websites of UK medical institutions and contacted individuals working within the field.
  
  
  RESULTS
  26 studies were included. Most were conducted in the USA, using mainly quantitative methods. We used inductive analysis of the topics addressed by each study to identity five main content areas: Quality Improvement; Managed Care, Use of Resources and Costs; General Leadership and Management; Role of the Doctor, and Patient Safety. Students have positive attitudes to clinical practice guidelines, quality improvement techniques and multidisciplinary teamwork, but mixed attitudes to managed care, cost containment and medical error. Education interventions had variable effects on students' attitudes. Medical students perceive a need for leadership and management education but identified lack of curriculum time and disinterest in some activities as potential barriers to implementation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The findings from our review may reflect the relatively little emphasis given to leadership and management in medical curricula. However, students recognise a need to develop leadership and management competences. Although further work needs to be undertaken, using rigorous methods, to identify the most effective and cost-effective curriculum innovations, this review offers the only currently available summary of work examining the attitudes of students to this important area of development for future doctors.
authors.affiliation: General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge, UK. mark.abbas@nhs.net
authors.forename: Mark R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Abbas
authors.forename: Thelma A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Quince
authors.forename: Diana F
authors.initials: DF
authors.lastname: Wood
authors.forename: John A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Benson
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002321:Career Choice; D003479:Curriculum; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007857:Leadership; D010819:Physician's Role; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology*
references.citation: Med Teach. 2009 Mar;31(3):244-50
references.pmid: 18825566
references.citation: Acad Med. 2005 Jun;80(6):600-6
references.pmid: 15917366
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Sep 5;298(9):1023-37
references.pmid: 17785647
references.citation: Acad Med. 2005 May;80(5):484-8
references.pmid: 15851463
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1998 Oct;47(8):1043-9
references.pmid: 9723850
references.citation: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9(1):5-14
references.pmid: 14739757
references.citation: Public Health. 1985 May;99(3):178-82
references.pmid: 4034914
references.citation: Acad Med. 2006 Jan;81(1):94-101
references.pmid: 16377828
references.citation: Harefuah. 2007 Jan;146(1):22-5, 79
references.pmid: 17294843
references.citation: Med Educ. 2003 Apr;37(4):368-75
references.pmid: 12654122
references.citation: Med Teach. 2005 Sep;27(6):493-8
references.pmid: 16261667
references.citation: Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36 Suppl:S93-7
references.pmid: 14961410
references.citation: J Community Health. 1994 Aug;19(4):253-69
references.pmid: 7929886
references.citation: Med Care. 1984 Jun;22(6):535-42
references.pmid: 6429455
references.citation: Acad Med. 1994 Apr;69(4):307-9
references.pmid: 8155241
references.citation: Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Jan;28(1):42-8
references.pmid: 11787239
references.citation: Med Health R I. 1997 Feb;80(2):57-60
references.pmid: 9046776
references.citation: Acad Med. 1998 Oct;73(10):1107-13
references.pmid: 9795630
references.citation: Med Educ. 1993 Nov;27(6):495-502
references.pmid: 8208157
references.citation: Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10):1011-8
references.pmid: 12377677
references.citation: Med Educ. 2001 Feb;35(2):148-53
references.pmid: 11169088
references.citation: Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36 Suppl:S99-104
references.pmid: 14961411
references.citation: Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1128-33
references.pmid: 12431927
references.citation: Acad Med. 2006 Mar;81(3):257-61
references.pmid: 16501269
references.citation: Physician Exec. 1996 Sep;22(9):31-4
references.pmid: 10161951
references.citation: Fam Med. 2007 May;39(5):320-5
references.pmid: 17476604