title: Ecosystem development in roadside grasslands: biotic control, plant-soil interactions, and dispersal limitations.
abstract: Roadside grasslands undergoing secondary succession are abundant, and represent ecologically meaningful examples of novel, human-created ecosystems. Interactions between plant and soil communities (hereafter plant-soil interactions) are of major importance in understanding the role of biotic control in ecosystem functioning, but little is known about these links in the context of ecosystem restoration and succession. The assessment of the key biotic communities and interactions driving ecosystem development will help practitioners to better allocate the limited resources devoted to roadside grassland restoration. We surveyed roadside grasslands from three successional stages (0-2, 7-9, and >20 years) in two Mediterranean regions of Spain. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate how interactions between plants, biological soil crusts (BSCs), and soil microbial functional diversity (soil microorganisms) affect indicators of ecosystem development and restoration: plant similarity to the reference ecosystem, erosion control, and soil C storage and N accumulation. Changes in plant community composition along the successional gradient exerted the strongest influence on these indicators. High BSC cover was associated with high soil stability, and high soil microbial functional diversity from late-successional stages was associated with high soil fertility. Contrary to our expectations, the indirect effects of plants, mediated by either BSCs or soil microorganisms, were very weak in both regions, suggesting a minor role for plant-soil interactions upon ecosystem development indicators over long periods. Our results suggest that natural vegetation dynamics effectively improved ecosystem development within a time frame of 20 years in the grasslands evaluated. They also indicate that this time could be shortened if management actions focus on: (1) maintaining well-conserved natural areas close to roadsides to enhance plant compositional changes towards late-successional stages, (2) increasing BSC cover in areas under strong erosion risk, to avoid soil loss, and (3) enhancing soil microbial functional diversity in resource-limited areas, to enhance soil C and N accumulation.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Biología y Geología, Area de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Spain. pablo.palacios@urjc.es
authors.forename: Pablo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: García-Palacios
authors.forename: Matthew A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Bowker
authors.forename: Fernando T
authors.initials: FT
authors.lastname: Maestre
authors.forename: Santiago
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Soliveres
authors.forename: Fernando
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Valladares
authors.forename: Jorge
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Papadopoulos
authors.forename: Adrián
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Escudero
mesh_terms: D003710:Demography; D017753:Ecosystem; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D008954:Models, Biological; D006109:Poaceae / Q000502:physiology*; D012987:Soil / Q000737:chemistry*; D013030:Spain; D014186:Transportation
chemical_list: D012987:Soil
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jun;69(6):3593-9
references.pmid: 12788767
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2007 May;10(5):394-400
references.pmid: 17498138
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2009 Jan;19(1):110-22
references.pmid: 19323176
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Feb;70(2):973-83
references.pmid: 14766579
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Oct 22;3(5):487-90
references.pmid: 17609172
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2006 Oct;52(3):365-77
references.pmid: 16710791
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Sep;9(9):1080-8
references.pmid: 16925657
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 12;365(1549):2057-70
references.pmid: 20513714
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Apr 17;422(6933):711-3
references.pmid: 12700759
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Nov;25(11):670-9
references.pmid: 20888063
references.citation: Oecologia. 2005 Jun;144(1):137-47
references.pmid: 15791426
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 22;272(1577):2105-15
references.pmid: 16191623
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 May;11(5):516-31
references.pmid: 18279352
references.citation: Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(1):1-14
references.pmid: 19412705
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Feb;23(2):104-12
references.pmid: 18191278
references.citation: J Ecol. 2011 Mar 1;99(2):551-562
references.pmid: 25914424
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Sep;11(9):980-92
references.pmid: 18522641
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Aug;25(8):468-78
references.pmid: 20557974