title: The logic layout of the TOL network of Pseudomonas putida pWW0 plasmid stems from a metabolic amplifier motif (MAM) that optimizes biodegradation of m-xylene.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The genetic network of the TOL plasmid pWW0 of the soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida mt-2 for catabolism of m-xylene is an archetypal model for environmental biodegradation of aromatic pollutants. Although nearly every metabolic and transcriptional component of this regulatory system is known to an extraordinary molecular detail, the complexity of its architecture is still perplexing. To gain an insight into the inner layout of this network a logic model of the TOL system was implemented, simulated and experimentally validated. This analysis made sense of the specific regulatory topology out on the basis of an unprecedented network motif around which the entire genetic circuit for m-xylene catabolism gravitates.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The most salient feature of the whole TOL regulatory network is the control exerted by two distinct but still intertwined regulators (XylR and XylS) on expression of two separated catabolic operons (upper and lower) for catabolism of m-xylene. Following model reduction, a minimal modular circuit composed by five basic variables appeared to suffice for fully describing the operation of the entire system. In silico simulation of the effect of various perturbations were compared with experimental data in which specific portions of the network were activated with selected inducers: m-xylene, o-xylene, 3-methylbenzylalcohol and 3-methylbenzoate. The results accredited the ability of the model to faithfully describe network dynamics. This analysis revealed that the entire regulatory structure of the TOL system enables the action an unprecedented metabolic amplifier motif (MAM). This motif synchronizes expression of the upper and lower portions of a very long metabolic system when cells face the head pathway substrate, m-xylene.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Logic modeling of the TOL circuit accounted for the intricate regulatory topology of this otherwise simple metabolic device. The found MAM appears to ensure a simultaneous expression of the upper and lower segments of the m-xylene catabolic route that would be difficult to bring about with a standard substrate-responsive single promoter. Furthermore, it is plausible that the MAM helps to avoid biochemical conflicts between competing plasmid-encoded and chromosomally-encoded pathways in this bacterium.
authors.affiliation: Systems Biology Program, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología CSIC Cantoblanco-Madrid, 28049, Spain.
authors.forename: Rafael
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Silva-Rocha
authors.forename: Hidde
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: de Jong
authors.forename: Javier
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Tamames
authors.forename: Víctor
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: de Lorenzo
mesh_terms: D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D053263:Gene Regulatory Networks; D008954:Models, Biological; D010957:Plasmids / Q000235:genetics; D016958:Pseudomonas putida / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D012989:Soil Pollutants / Q000378:metabolism*; D014992:Xylenes / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D012989:Soil Pollutants; D014992:Xylenes; C031285:3-xylene
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2004 Feb 27;279(9):7777-84
references.pmid: 14672954
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Feb 12;19(3):336-44
references.pmid: 12584118
references.citation: Science. 2001 Jun 15;292(5524):2080-3
references.pmid: 11408658
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2010 Aug 6;285(32):24412-9
references.pmid: 20529863
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2002 May;31(1):64-8
references.pmid: 11967538
references.citation: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003 Jun;14(3):248-54
references.pmid: 12849776
references.citation: Mol Gen Genet. 1987 May;207(2-3):349-54
references.pmid: 3475526
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 May;57(5):1546-53
references.pmid: 16348493
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2004 Mar;186(6):1898-901
references.pmid: 14996822
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2000 Nov;182(22):6339-46
references.pmid: 11053377
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2005 Jun;2(6):443-8
references.pmid: 15908923
references.citation: Bull Math Biol. 2004 Mar;66(2):301-40
references.pmid: 14871568
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Apr;64(2):154-74
references.pmid: 14689248
references.citation: Science. 1987 Dec 4;238(4832):1395-8
references.pmid: 3479842
references.citation: ISME J. 2009 Jul;3(7):761-9
references.pmid: 19340086
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2001 Oct;183(19):5571-9
references.pmid: 11544219
references.citation: J Comput Biol. 2002;9(1):67-103
references.pmid: 11911796
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jun;12(6):1705-18
references.pmid: 20553551
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2008 May;190(9):3118-28
references.pmid: 18296514
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2000 Aug;37(3):485-91
references.pmid: 10931342
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2011 Sep;13(9):2389-402
references.pmid: 21410625
references.citation: Trends Microbiol. 2000 Mar;8(3):128-33
references.pmid: 10707066
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1973 Apr;39(1):103-29
references.pmid: 4741704
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Dec;78(12):7458-62
references.pmid: 6950388
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1975 Oct;124(1):7-13
references.pmid: 1176436
references.citation: IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2011 Jan-Mar;8(1):166-81
references.pmid: 21071805
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1998 Jun;180(11):2889-94
references.pmid: 9603877
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jun 10;6(6):e1000812
references.pmid: 20548959
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Apr 11;20(7):1755-62
references.pmid: 1579469
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 25;266(24):15832-8
references.pmid: 1874736
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5182-6
references.pmid: 2440045
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Sep;34(5):658-84
references.pmid: 20412307
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 14;100(21):11980-5
references.pmid: 14530388
references.citation: Mol Biosyst. 2011 Nov;7(11):2982-90
references.pmid: 21853168
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Jun;63(6):2330-7
references.pmid: 9172352
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Apr;61(4):1352-6
references.pmid: 7538275
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 1994;235:386-405
references.pmid: 8057911
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr;2(4):268-79
references.pmid: 11283699
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Nov 1;42(2):199-208
references.pmid: 19709279
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6;99(16):10555-60
references.pmid: 12145321
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1999 Mar;181(5):1585-602
references.pmid: 10049392
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2008 Aug;69(3):698-713
references.pmid: 19138193
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003 Oct;6(5):482-9
references.pmid: 14572541
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1989 Dec;171(12):6782-90
references.pmid: 2687253
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1997;51:341-73
references.pmid: 9343354
references.citation: Dev Biol. 2007 Oct 15;310(2):187-95
references.pmid: 17822690
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Feb;3(2):105-18
references.pmid: 15685222
references.citation: Nature. 2000 May 18;405(6784):299-304
references.pmid: 10830951
references.citation: Science. 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):824-7
references.pmid: 12399590