title: Prospective power calculations for the Four Lab study of a multigenerational reproductive/developmental toxicity rodent bioassay using a complex mixture of disinfection by-products in the low-response region.
abstract: In complex mixture toxicology, there is growing emphasis on testing environmentally representative doses that improve the relevance of results for health risk assessment, but are typically much lower than those used in traditional toxicology studies. Traditional experimental designs with typical sample sizes may have insufficient statistical power to detect effects caused by environmentally relevant doses. Proper study design, with adequate statistical power, is critical to ensuring that experimental results are useful for environmental health risk assessment. Studies with environmentally realistic complex mixtures have practical constraints on sample concentration factor and sample volume as well as the number of animals that can be accommodated. This article describes methodology for calculation of statistical power for non-independent observations for a multigenerational rodent reproductive/developmental bioassay. The use of the methodology is illustrated using the U.S. EPA's Four Lab study in which rodents were exposed to chlorinated water concentrates containing complex mixtures of drinking water disinfection by-products. Possible experimental designs included two single-block designs and a two-block design. Considering the possible study designs and constraints, a design of two blocks of 100 females with a 40:60 ratio of control:treated animals and a significance level of 0.05 yielded maximum prospective power (~90%) to detect pup weight decreases, while providing the most power to detect increased prenatal loss.
authors.affiliation: Statistics and Information Analysis, Battelle Memorial Institute, 505 King Ave., Columbus, OH 43201, USA. DingusC@battelle.org
authors.forename: Cheryl A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Dingus
authors.forename: Linda K
authors.initials: LK
authors.lastname: Teuschler
authors.forename: Glenn E
authors.initials: GE
authors.lastname: Rice
authors.forename: Jane Ellen
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Simmons
authors.forename: Michael G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Narotsky
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001681:Biological Assay / Q000379:methods*; D045424:Complex Mixtures / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity; D004202:Disinfectants / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity*; D060766:Drinking Water / Q000032:analysis; D005260:Female; D054879:Halogenation; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D051381:Rats; D018570:Risk Assessment; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000379:methods*; D014481:United States; D014484:United States Environmental Protection Agency; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity*; D018508:Water Purification
chemical_list: D045424:Complex Mixtures; D004202:Disinfectants; D060766:Drinking Water; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical
references.citation: Epidemiology. 1998 Sep;9(5):484-9
references.pmid: 9730025
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2004 Apr 23-May 28;67(8-10):741-54
references.pmid: 15192866
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(8):920-5
references.pmid: 15175183
references.citation: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011 Jul 15;254(2):100-26
references.pmid: 21296098
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(17):1149-64
references.pmid: 18636389
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(17):1222-34
references.pmid: 18636394
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2009;72(7):429-36
references.pmid: 19267305
references.citation: J Nutr. 2003 May;133(5 Suppl 2):1592S-1596S
references.pmid: 12730473
references.citation: Teratology. 1979 Apr;19(2):165-9
references.pmid: 473070
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Feb;113(2):225-32
references.pmid: 15687062
references.citation: Stat Med. 1998 Jul 30;17(14):1643-58
references.pmid: 9699236
references.citation: Future Child. 1995 Spring;5(1):176-96
references.pmid: 7543353
references.citation: Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1979 Aug;17(4):343-7
references.pmid: 520968
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(17):1133-48
references.pmid: 18636388
references.citation: Toxicology. 1995 Dec 28;105(2-3):111-9
references.pmid: 8571350
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(17):1216-21
references.pmid: 18636393
references.citation: Epidemiology. 1998 Mar;9(2):134-40
references.pmid: 9504280
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(17):1195-215
references.pmid: 18636392
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Oct 1;44(19):7184-92
references.pmid: 20496936
references.citation: Toxicol Sci. 2004 Oct;81(2):419-29
references.pmid: 15254335
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2004 Mar;15(2):179-86
references.pmid: 15127910
references.citation: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007 Sep 1;223(2):99-103
references.pmid: 17434550
references.citation: Reprod Toxicol. 2009 Sep;28(2):180-7
references.pmid: 19409482
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(17):1187-94
references.pmid: 18636391
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(17):1125-32
references.pmid: 18636387
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Dec 1;40(23):7175-85
references.pmid: 17180964
references.citation: Reprod Toxicol. 1995 Nov-Dec;9(6):549-61
references.pmid: 8597651
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(17):1165-86
references.pmid: 18636390
references.citation: Toxicol Sci. 2008 Oct;105(2):235-59
references.pmid: 18281716
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Dec;110 Suppl 6:1013-24
references.pmid: 12634133
references.citation: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Aug;36(1):34-9
references.pmid: 12383716