title: Comparison of Generalized Estimating Equations and Quadratic Inference Functions in superior versus inferior Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The celebrated generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach is often used in longitudinal data analysis While this method behaves robustly against misspecification of the working correlation structure, it has some limitations on efficacy of estimators, goodness-of-fit tests and model selection criteria The quadratic inference functions (QIF) is a new statistical methodology that overcomes these limitations.
  
  
  METHODS
  We administered the use of QIF and GEE in comparing the superior and inferior Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation, while our focus was on the efficiency of estimation and using model selection criteria, we compared the effect of implant location on intraocular pressure (IOP) in refractory glaucoma patients We modeled the relationship between IOP and implant location, patient's sex and age, best corrected visual acuity, history of cataract surgery, preoperative IOP and months after surgery with assuming unstructured working correlation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  63 eyes of 63 patients were included in this study, 28 eyes in inferior group and 35 eyes in superior group The GEE analysis revealed that preoperative IOP has a significant effect on IOP (p = 0 011) However, QIF showed that preoperative IOP, months after surgery and squared months are significantly associated with IOP after surgery (p < 0 05) Overall, estimates from QIF are more efficient than GEE (RE = 1 272).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In the case of unstructured working correlation, the QIF is more efficient than GEE There were no considerable difference between these locations, our results confirmed previously published works which mentioned it is better that glaucoma patients undergo superior AGV implantation.
authors.affiliation: MSc Student of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
authors.forename: Razieh
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Khajeh-Kazemi
authors.forename: Banafsheh
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Golestan
authors.forename: Kazem
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Mohammad
authors.forename: Mahmoud
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mahmoudi
authors.forename: Saharnaz
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Nedjat
authors.forename: Mohammad
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pakravan
references.citation: Biometrics. 1999 Jun;55(2):574-9
references.pmid: 11318216
references.citation: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 May 09;8:28
references.pmid: 18466627
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2009 Feb;116(2):208-13
references.pmid: 19062098
references.citation: Biometrics. 2002 Dec;58(4):727-34
references.pmid: 12495126
references.citation: Lancet. 1999 Nov 20;354(9192):1803-10
references.pmid: 10577657
references.citation: Biometrics. 1998 Jun;54(2):720-9
references.pmid: 9629652
references.citation: Addict Behav. 2007 Jan;32(1):187-93
references.pmid: 16650625
references.citation: Stat Med. 2009 Dec 20;28(29):3683-96
references.pmid: 19757486
references.citation: Biometrics. 2001 Jun;57(2):529-34
references.pmid: 11414579