title: Striatal topography of probability and magnitude information for decisions under uncertainty.
abstract: Most decisions involve some element of uncertainty. When the outcomes of these decisions have different likelihoods of occurrence, the decision-maker must consider both the magnitude of each outcome and the probability of its occurrence, but how do individual decision makers combine the two dimensions of magnitude and probability? Here, we approach the problem by separating in time the presentation of magnitude and probability information, and focus the analysis of fMRI activations on the first piece of information only. Thus, we are able to identify distinct neural circuits for the two dimensions without the confounding effect of divided attention or the cognitive operation of combining them. We find that magnitude information correlates with the size of the response of the ventral striatum while probability information correlates with the response in the dorsal striatum. The relative responsiveness of these two striatal regions correlates with the behavioral tendency to weight one more than the other. The results are consistent with a second-order process of information aggregation in which individuals make separate judgments for magnitude and probability and then integrate those judgments.
authors.affiliation: Economics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States. gberns@emory.edu
authors.forename: Gregory S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Berns
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bell
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001479:Basal Ganglia / Q000502:physiology*; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D035501:Uncertainty; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Jan;13(1):91-100
references.pmid: 11133312
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:473-500
references.pmid: 10845072
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Jun 26;58(6):967-73
references.pmid: 18579085
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 7;29(40):12574-83
references.pmid: 19812332
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 1;29(3):977-83
references.pmid: 16153860
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Apr 08;5:38
references.pmid: 21519392
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Aug 15;21(16):RC159
references.pmid: 11459880
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 1;30(2):668-77
references.pmid: 16321546
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 Mar 2;49(5):765-75
references.pmid: 16504951
references.citation: Science. 2005 Dec 9;310(5754):1680-3
references.pmid: 16339445
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 15;39(4):2047-57
references.pmid: 18060809
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):274-90
references.pmid: 26158964
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 1;27(31):8161-5
references.pmid: 17670959
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):95-108
references.pmid: 15110000
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 1;44(1):51-61
references.pmid: 18805493
references.citation: Games Econ Behav. 2005 Aug;52(2):213-256
references.pmid: 16845435
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):538-47
references.pmid: 17904386
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 May 13;42(3):509-17
references.pmid: 15134646
references.citation: Science. 2004 Apr 16;304(5669):452-4
references.pmid: 15087550
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 May 8;58(3):451-63
references.pmid: 18466754
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 May 11;25(19):4806-12
references.pmid: 15888656
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;86(4):1916-36
references.pmid: 11600651
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 26;315(5811):515-8
references.pmid: 17255512
references.citation: Science. 2005 Nov 25;310(5752):1337-40
references.pmid: 16311337
references.citation: Neuron. 2009 May 28;62(4):593-602
references.pmid: 19477159
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2000;96(4):651-6
references.pmid: 10727783
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Jul 9;28(28):7143-52
references.pmid: 18614684
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Dec;10(12):1625-33
references.pmid: 17982449
references.citation: Science. 2005 Mar 11;307(5715):1642-5
references.pmid: 15761155
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Sep 3;23(22):8092-7
references.pmid: 12954871
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Oct 10;36(2):265-84
references.pmid: 12383781
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 1;24(3):862-73
references.pmid: 15652321
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):545-56
references.pmid: 18545266
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 Aug 3;51(3):381-90
references.pmid: 16880132
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 18;29(7):2231-7
references.pmid: 19228976
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1621-32
references.pmid: 17122317
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Dec;8(12):1704-11
references.pmid: 16286932
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15;44(2):600-9
references.pmid: 18804540
references.citation: Science. 2003 Mar 21;299(5614):1898-902
references.pmid: 12649484
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 6;31(14):5504-11
references.pmid: 21471387
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Apr;4(4):437-41
references.pmid: 11276236
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 27;31(17):6296-304
references.pmid: 21525269
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 3;30(9):3210-9
references.pmid: 20203180
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 13;26(37):9530-7
references.pmid: 16971537
references.citation: Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1993 Sep-Dec;18(3):247-91
references.pmid: 8401595
references.citation: Science. 1997 Mar 14;275(5306):1593-9
references.pmid: 9054347
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Jul 15;400(6741):233-8
references.pmid: 10421364