title: Fiber angle and aspect ratio influence the shear mechanics of oriented electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds.
abstract: Fibrocartilages, including the knee meniscus and the annulus fibrosus (AF) of the intervertebral disc, play critical mechanical roles in load transmission across joints and their function is dependent upon well-defined structural hierarchies, organization, and composition. All, however, are compromised in the pathologic transformations associated with tissue degeneration. Tissue engineering strategies that address these key features, for example, aligned nanofibrous scaffolds seeded with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), represent a promising approach for the regeneration of these fibrous structures. While such engineered constructs can replicate native tissue structure and uniaxial tensile properties, the multidirectional loading encountered by these tissues in vivo necessitates that they function adequately in other loading modalities as well, including shear. As previous findings have shown that native tissue tensile and shear properties are dependent on fiber angle and sample aspect ratio, respectively, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a changing fiber angle and sample aspect ratio on the shear properties of aligned electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds, and to determine how extracellular matrix deposition by resident MSCs modulates the measured shear response. Results show that fiber orientation and sample aspect ratio significantly influence the response of scaffolds in shear, and that measured shear strains can be predicted by finite element models. Furthermore, acellular PCL scaffolds possessed a relatively high shear modulus, 2-4 fold greater than native tissue, independent of fiber angle and aspect ratio. It was further noted that under testing conditions that engendered significant fiber stretch, the aggregate resistance to shear was higher, indicating a role for fiber stretch in the overall shear response. Finally, with time in culture, the shear modulus of MSC laden constructs increased, suggesting that deposited ECM contributes to the construct shear properties. Collectively, these findings show that aligned electrospun PCL scaffolds are a promising tool for engineering fibrocartilage tissues, and that the shear properties of both acellular and cell-seeded formulations can match or exceed native tissue benchmarks.
authors.affiliation: McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
authors.forename: Tristan P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Driscoll
authors.forename: Nandan L
authors.initials: NL
authors.lastname: Nerurkar
authors.forename: Nathan T
authors.initials: NT
authors.lastname: Jacobs
authors.forename: Dawn M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Elliott
authors.forename: Robert L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Mauck
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D049109:Cell Proliferation; D005109:Extracellular Matrix / Q000378:metabolism; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000166:cytology; D008422:Materials Testing; D055595:Mechanical Phenomena; D059630:Mesenchymal Stem Cells / Q000166:cytology; D057139:Nanofibers / Q000737:chemistry*; D036103:Nanotechnology / Q000379:methods*; D011091:Polyesters / Q000737:chemistry; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013997:Time Factors; D054457:Tissue Scaffolds / Q000737:chemistry*
chemical_list: D011091:Polyesters; C016240:polycaprolactone
references.citation: Anat Embryol (Berl). 1998 Apr;197(4):317-24
references.pmid: 9565324
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2005 Feb;26(6):599-609
references.pmid: 15282138
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2691-701
references.pmid: 19018251
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 1;33(15):1701-7
references.pmid: 18594464
references.citation: J Biomech. 2010 Apr 19;43(6):1017-30
references.pmid: 20080239
references.citation: J Anat. 1980 Aug;131(Pt 1):81-90
references.pmid: 7440405
references.citation: Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):43-52
references.pmid: 16957008
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Feb;14(2):179-89
references.pmid: 16257243
references.citation: Tissue Eng Part A. 2008 Sep;14(9):1527-37
references.pmid: 18707229
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Sep;16(9):1074-82
references.pmid: 18353693
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2006 Oct;27(30):5220-9
references.pmid: 16814857
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Oct;17(10):1377-84
references.pmid: 19427928
references.citation: J Biomech Eng. 2001 Apr;123(2):170-5
references.pmid: 11340878
references.citation: Tissue Eng Part A. 2008 Jul;14(7):1195-202
references.pmid: 18593357
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Oct;14(10):1056-65
references.pmid: 16731009
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 1999 Sep;17(5):732-7
references.pmid: 10569484
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 15;35(8):867-73
references.pmid: 20354467
references.citation: Anat Rec. 1988 Apr;220(4):337-56
references.pmid: 3289416
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 1;34(1):4-9
references.pmid: 19127155
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 1991 Jul;9(4):550-8
references.pmid: 2045982
references.citation: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:787-90
references.pmid: 17946860
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Oct;(367 Suppl):S254-72
references.pmid: 10546651
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2005 Jan;26(1):37-46
references.pmid: 15193879
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2008 May;29(15):2348-58
references.pmid: 18313138
references.citation: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Nov;4(8):1611-9
references.pmid: 22098863
references.citation: Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 Sep;16(9):2699-708
references.pmid: 20367254
references.citation: J Biomech Eng. 2009 Oct;131(10):101012
references.pmid: 19831482
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2010 Aug;31(24):6190-200
references.pmid: 20494438
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Mar;(252):19-31
references.pmid: 2406069
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 2007 Aug;25(8):1018-28
references.pmid: 17457824
references.citation: Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2009 Jun;15(2):171-93
references.pmid: 19207040
references.citation: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Dec 15;91(4):1089-99
references.pmid: 19107787
references.citation: J Biomech. 2005 Aug;38(8):1674-84
references.pmid: 15958225
references.citation: Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007;65(1):29-36
references.pmid: 17539759
references.citation: Nat Mater. 2009 Dec;8(12):986-92
references.pmid: 19855383
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 1989;7(6):771-82
references.pmid: 2677284
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 2001 Jan;19(1):2-10
references.pmid: 11332616
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2011 Jan;32(2):461-8
references.pmid: 20880577
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2007 Apr;28(11):1967-77
references.pmid: 17250888
references.citation: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:2098-101
references.pmid: 17946937
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Sep;(306):34-45
references.pmid: 8070209
references.citation: Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003 May;41(3):365-71
references.pmid: 12803304
references.citation: Connect Tissue Res. 1989;23(1):75-88
references.pmid: 2632144
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 2009 Mar;27(3):416-20
references.pmid: 18924143
references.citation: Med Eng Phys. 2000 Jun;22(5):349-57
references.pmid: 11121768
references.citation: J Biomech. 2007;40(8):1686-1693
references.pmid: 17056048
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2006 Jan;27(3):362-70
references.pmid: 16165204