title: Do Research Intermediaries Reduce Perceived Coercion to Enter Research Trials Among Criminally Involved Substance Abusers?
abstract: We examined the efficacy of including a research intermediary (RI) during the consent process in reducing participants' perceptions of coercion to enroll in a research study. Eighty-four drug court clients being recruited into an ongoing study were randomized to receive a standard informed consent process alone (standard condition) or with an RI (intermediary condition). Before obtaining consent, RIs met with clients individually to discuss remaining concerns. Findings provided preliminary evidence that RIs reduced client perceptions that their participation might influence how clinical and judicial staff view them. This suggests that using RIs may improve participant autonomy in clinical studies.
authors.affiliation: Treatment Research Institute.
authors.forename: David S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Festinger
authors.forename: Karen L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Dugosh
authors.forename: Jason R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Croft
authors.forename: Patricia L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Arabia
authors.forename: Douglas B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Marlowe
references.citation: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jan 12;86(2-3):95-105
references.pmid: 16930856
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 1988 Dec;12(4):455-75
references.pmid: 11659248
references.citation: Addiction. 2000 Jul;95(7):1043-53
references.pmid: 10962769
references.citation: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2000 Fall;13(3):141-9
references.pmid: 11001137
references.citation: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Oct;24(10):1510-6
references.pmid: 11045859
references.citation: IRB. 1994 Nov-Dec;16(6):7-9, 11
references.pmid: 11659990
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jun;52(6):780-5
references.pmid: 11376225
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Dec;52(12):1034-9
references.pmid: 7492255
references.citation: J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5
references.pmid: 19886379
references.citation: IRB. 1993 Mar-Apr;15(2):10-1
references.pmid: 11651567
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Apr;67(2):186-93
references.pmid: 10224728
references.citation: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar;5(1):93-102
references.pmid: 20235867