title: Socioeconomic-related health inequality in South Africa: evidence from General Household Surveys.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Inequalities in health have received considerable attention from health scientists and economists. In South Africa, inequalities exist in socio-economic status (SES) and in access to basic social services and are exacerbated by inequalities in health. While health systems, together with the wider social determinants of health, are relevant in seeking to improve health status and health inequalities, those that need good quality health care too seldom get it. Studies on the burden of ill-health in South Africa have shown consistently that, relative to the wealthy, the poor suffer more from more disease and violence. However, these studies are based on selected disease conditions and only consider a single point in time. Trend analyses have yet to be produced. This paper specifically investigates socio-economic related health inequality in South Africa and seeks to understand how the burden of self-reported illness and disability is distributed and whether this has changed since the early 2000s.
  
  
  METHODS
  Several rounds (2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008) of the South African General Household Surveys (GHS) data were used, with standardized and normalized self-reported illness and disability concentration indices to assess the distribution of illness and disability across socio-economic groups. Composite indices of socio-economic status were created using a set of common assets and household characteristics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  This study demonstrates the existence of socio-economic gradients in self-reported ill-health in South Africa. The burden of the major categories of ill-health and disability is greater among lower than higher socio-economic groups. Even non-communicable diseases, which are frequently seen as diseases of affluence, are increasingly being reported by lower socio-economic groups. For instance, the concentration index of flu (and diabetes) declined from about 0.17 (0.10) in 2002 to 0.05 (0.01) in 2008. These results have also been confirmed internationally.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The current burden and distribution of ill-health indicates how critical it is for the South African health system to strive for access to and use of health services that is in line with need for such care. Concerted government efforts, within both the health sector and other social and economic sectors are therefore needed to address the significant health inequalities in South Africa.
authors.affiliation: Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, South Africa. John.Ataguba@uct.ac.za.
authors.forename: John E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Ataguba
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Akazili
authors.forename: Di
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: McIntyre
references.citation: Lancet. 2002 Jul 20;360(9328):252-4
references.pmid: 12133675
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2007 May 15;7:78
references.pmid: 17504530
references.citation: Health Econ. 2005 Apr;14(4):429-32
references.pmid: 15495147
references.citation: Health Econ. 2004 Jul;13(7):629-47
references.pmid: 15259043
references.citation: Health Econ. 2014 Jun;23(6):706-18
references.pmid: 23765700
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Apr;66(8):1828-40
references.pmid: 18299167
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(5):545-57
references.pmid: 1962226
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1684-9
references.pmid: 18994667
references.citation: Int J Equity Health. 2005 Jan 14;4(1):2
references.pmid: 15651987
references.citation: Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003 Feb-May;15(1-2):91-6
references.pmid: 12745315
references.citation: Lancet. 1997 Jun 7;349(9066):1655-9
references.pmid: 9186383
references.citation: J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):504-15
references.pmid: 18367273
references.citation: Br J Nurs. 2008 Nov 27-Dec 10;17(21):1320-5
references.pmid: 19060813
references.citation: Lancet. 2009 Sep 5;374(9692):817-34
references.pmid: 19709728
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;35(2):492-4
references.pmid: 16446351
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1996 Aug;43(3):291-301
references.pmid: 8844932
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):97-105
references.pmid: 11953787
references.citation: Epidemiol Rev. 2004;26:53-62
references.pmid: 15234947
references.citation: Lancet. 1971 Feb 27;1(7696):405-12
references.pmid: 4100731
references.citation: Ann Fam Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;5(6):503-10
references.pmid: 18025487
references.citation: Public Health Rep. 2003 May-Jun;118(3):240-60
references.pmid: 12766219
references.citation: J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):516-20, author reply 521-4
references.pmid: 19167117
references.citation: Demography. 2001 Feb;38(1):115-32
references.pmid: 11227840
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):3-18
references.pmid: 10686729
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1992 Feb;34(3):213-26
references.pmid: 1557663
references.citation: Int J Health Serv. 2007;37(4):673-91
references.pmid: 18072315
references.citation: Int J Equity Health. 2003 Sep 11;2(1):7
references.pmid: 14514357
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2009 Mar;24(2):83-93
references.pmid: 19218332
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(6):553-60
references.pmid: 11436478
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(2):492-505
references.pmid: 17920743
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):42-54
references.pmid: 10686732
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Sep 13;372(9642):940-9
references.pmid: 18790317
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9
references.pmid: 18994664
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2002 Dec;55(11):1989-2004
references.pmid: 12406466
references.citation: Health Policy. 2011 Mar;99(3):261-6
references.pmid: 21075470
references.citation: PLoS One. 2007 Dec 12;2(12):e1290
references.pmid: 18074015
references.citation: Age Ageing. 2000 Mar;29(2):149-57
references.pmid: 10791450