title: The two Caenorhabditis elegans UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase homologues have distinct biological functions.
abstract: The UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (UGGT) is the sensor of glycoprotein conformations in the glycoprotein folding quality control as it exclusively glucosylates glycoproteins not displaying their native conformations. Monoglucosylated glycoproteins thus formed may interact with the lectin-chaperones calnexin (CNX) and calreticulin (CRT). This interaction prevents premature exit of folding intermediates to the Golgi and enhances folding efficiency. Bioinformatic analysis showed that in C. elegans there are two open reading frames (F48E3.3 and F26H9.8 to be referred as uggt-1 and uggt-2, respectively) coding for UGGT homologues. Expression of both genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutants devoid of UGGT activity showed that uggt-1 codes for an active UGGT protein (CeUGGT-1). On the other hand, uggt-2 coded for a protein (CeUGGT-2) apparently not displaying a canonical UGGT activity. This protein was essential for viability, although cnx/crt null worms were viable. We constructed transgenic worms carrying the uggt-1 promoter linked to the green fluorescent protein (GFP) coding sequence and found that CeUGGT-1 is expressed in cells of the nervous system. uggt-1 is upregulated under ER stress through the ire-1 arm of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Real-time PCR analysis showed that both uggt-1 and uggt-2 genes are expressed during the entire C. elegans life cycle. RNAi-mediated depletion of CeUGGT-1 but not of CeUGGT-2 resulted in a reduced lifespan and that of CeUGGT-1 and CeUGGT-2 in a developmental delay. We found that both CeUGGT1 and CeUGGT2 play a protective role under ER stress conditions, since 10 µg/ml tunicamycin arrested development at the L2/L3 stage of both uggt-1(RNAi) and uggt-2(RNAi) but not of control worms. Furthermore, we found that the role of CeUGGT-2 but not CeUGGT-1 is significant in relieving low ER stress levels in the absence of the ire-1 unfolding protein response signaling pathway. Our results indicate that both C. elegans UGGT homologues have distinct biological functions.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Glycobiology, Fundación Instituto Leloir, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
authors.forename: Lucila I
authors.initials: LI
authors.lastname: Buzzi
authors.forename: Sergio H
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Simonetta
authors.forename: Armando J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Parodi
authors.forename: Olga A
authors.initials: OA
authors.lastname: Castro
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D030801:Animals, Genetically Modified; D001483:Base Sequence; D017173:Caenorhabditis elegans / Q000201:enzymology* / Q000235:genetics; D003001:Cloning, Molecular; D017931:DNA Primers; D004721:Endoplasmic Reticulum / Q000378:metabolism; D004789:Enzyme Activation; D005964:Glucosyltransferases / Q000378:metabolism*; D049452:Green Fluorescent Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D007527:Isoenzymes / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D016366:Open Reading Frames; D034622:RNA Interference; D060888:Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012568:Schizosaccharomyces / Q000235:genetics
chemical_list: D017931:DNA Primers; D007527:Isoenzymes; D049452:Green Fluorescent Proteins; D005964:Glucosyltransferases; C072423:mannosylglycoprotein 1,3-glucosyltransferase
references.citation: Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007 Dec;18(6):732-42
references.pmid: 17997334
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 31;278(44):43320-8
references.pmid: 12913004
references.citation: J Biochem. 2004 Sep;136(3):343-50
references.pmid: 15598891
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1989 Oct 3;28(20):8108-16
references.pmid: 2532539
references.citation: Gene Expr Patterns. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1-2):135-43
references.pmid: 21044701
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2005 Sep;1(3):e37
references.pmid: 16184190
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 Sep 27;31(6):957-71
references.pmid: 11580896
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;10(6):3013-9
references.pmid: 2188106
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2007 Sep 14;372(2):331-40
references.pmid: 17651753
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1998 Nov 2;143(3):625-35
references.pmid: 9813085
references.citation: Exp Cell Res. 2000 Apr 10;256(1):105-11
references.pmid: 10739657
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Oct 29;395(6705):854
references.pmid: 9804418
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:795-823
references.pmid: 2005825
references.citation: Methods Cell Biol. 1995;48:451-82
references.pmid: 8531738
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Nov;22(21):7398-404
references.pmid: 12370287
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Jul;28(13):4261-74
references.pmid: 18458060
references.citation: EMBO J. 1995 Apr 3;14(7):1294-303
references.pmid: 7729408
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Dec 16;338(2):1018-30
references.pmid: 16256074
references.citation: Biochemistry. 2000 Mar 7;39(9):2149-63
references.pmid: 10694380
references.citation: Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2007;72:489-97
references.pmid: 18419309
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1992 May 5;267(13):9236-40
references.pmid: 1533626
references.citation: Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):71-94
references.pmid: 4366476
references.citation: Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Sep;12(9):2835-45
references.pmid: 11553721
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2007 Nov 23;282(47):34525-34
references.pmid: 17890727
references.citation: Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010 Jun;42(6):796-9
references.pmid: 20079872
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 6;278(23):20540-6
references.pmid: 12649273
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1994 Dec 2;269(48):30701-6
references.pmid: 7982990
references.citation: EMBO J. 1996 Feb 15;15(4):705-13
references.pmid: 8631292
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Jan 3;415(6867):92-6
references.pmid: 11780124
references.citation: Cell. 2001 Dec 28;107(7):893-903
references.pmid: 11779465
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2002 Aug 19;158(4):639-46
references.pmid: 12186849
references.citation: FASEB J. 2003 Oct;17(13):1960-2
references.pmid: 12897069
references.citation: Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Sep;14(9):3529-40
references.pmid: 12972544