title: Conjunctival reconstruction with progenitor cell-derived autologous epidermal sheets in rhesus monkey.
abstract: Severe ocular surface diseases are some of the most challenging problems that the clinician faces today. Conventional management is generally unsatisfactory, and the long-term ocular consequences of these conditions are devastating. It is significantly important to find a substitute for conjunctival epithelial cells. This study was to explore the possibility of progenitor cell-derived epidermal sheets on denuded amniotic membrane to reconstruct ocular surface of conjunctiva damaged monkeys. We isolated epidermal progenitor cells of rhesus monkeys by type IV collagen adhesion, and then expanded progenitor cell-derived epidermal sheets on denuded amniotic membrane ex vivo. At 3 weeks after the conjunctiva injury, the damaged ocular surface of four monkeys was surgically reconstructed by transplanting the autologous cultivated epidermal progenitor cells. At 2 weeks after surgery, transplants were removed and examined with Hematoxylin-eosin staining, Periodic acid Schiff staining, immunofluorescent staining, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Histological examination of transplanted sheets revealed that the cell sheets were healthy alive, adhered well to the denuded amniotic membrane, and had several layers of epithelial cells. Electron microscopy showed that the epithelial cells were very similar in appearance to those of normal conjunctival epithelium, even without goblet cell detected. Epithelial cells of transplants had numerous desmosomal junctions and were attached to the amniotic membrane with hemidesmosomes. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of the conjunctival specific markers, mucin 4 and keratin 4, in the transplanted epidermal progenitor cells. In conclusion, our present study successfully reconstructed conjunctiva with autologous transplantation of progenitor cell-derived epidermal sheets on denuded AM in conjunctival damaged monkeys, which is the first step toward assessing the use of autologous transplantation of progenitor cells of nonocular surface origin. Epidermal progenitor cells could be provided as a new substitute for conjunctival epithelial cells to overcome the problems of autologous conjunctiva shortage.
authors.affiliation: State Key laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
authors.forename: Rong
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.forename: Xinchun
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Danping
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: Bing
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: Nan
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Gao
authors.forename: Zhichong
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Jian
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ge
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D003228:Conjunctiva / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism; D004847:Epithelial Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D053527:Keratin-4 / Q000378:metabolism; D008253:Macaca mulatta; D055264:Mucin-4 / Q000378:metabolism; D013234:Stem Cells / Q000166:cytology*; D014182:Transplantation, Autologous
chemical_list: D053527:Keratin-4; D055264:Mucin-4
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31;95(7):3902-7
references.pmid: 9520465
references.citation: Cell Res. 2008 Mar;18(3):360-71
references.pmid: 18071365
references.citation: Surv Ophthalmol. 1998 Jul-Aug;43(1):19-46
references.pmid: 9716191
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;47(6):2381-9
references.pmid: 16723447
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 1992 Mar;99(3):383-95
references.pmid: 1565450
references.citation: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1999 Apr;20(4):595-604
references.pmid: 10100990
references.citation: Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Oct;7(5):450-3
references.pmid: 17873588
references.citation: Cell Biol Int. 2004;28(7):523-9
references.pmid: 15261160
references.citation: Gastroenterology. 1994 Apr;106(4):1054-61
references.pmid: 8143972
references.citation: Cancer Res. 1987 Nov 1;47(21):5616-9
references.pmid: 3664468
references.citation: Cornea. 1999 Jan;18(1):73-9
references.pmid: 9894941
references.citation: Cell Prolif. 2007 Oct;40(5):685-705
references.pmid: 17877610
references.citation: Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2003 Jul;78(7):375-81
references.pmid: 12898407
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Nov;103(11):1736-40
references.pmid: 3904687
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Mar;42(3):549-56
references.pmid: 11222510
references.citation: Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011 May;43(5):751-9
references.pmid: 21292023
references.citation: Eye (Lond). 2005 Mar;19(3):273-8
references.pmid: 15286672
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2000 Feb;114(2):321-7
references.pmid: 10651993
references.citation: J Immunol Methods. 2002 Sep 15;267(2):109-17
references.pmid: 12165432
references.citation: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Sep 21;85(36):2554-8
references.pmid: 16321302
references.citation: Transplantation. 2004 Jun 15;77(11):1729-34
references.pmid: 15201674
references.citation: Wound Repair Regen. 2001 Nov-Dec;9(6):483-94
references.pmid: 11896990
references.citation: J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 1999 Dec;4(3):296-301
references.pmid: 10674385
references.citation: Mol Biol Cell. 2000 Feb;11(2):453-66
references.pmid: 10679006
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Dec;37(13):2559-71
references.pmid: 8977470
references.citation: J Pathol. 2002 Jul;197(4):479-91
references.pmid: 12115864
references.citation: Int J Dermatol. 2008 Jun;47(6):551-6
references.pmid: 18477142
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Mar;82(3):235-40
references.pmid: 9602618
references.citation: Eur J Dermatol. 2007 Jul-Aug;17(4):302-8
references.pmid: 17540636
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Jan;33(1):218-27
references.pmid: 1370440
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jun;45(6):1789-95
references.pmid: 15161841
references.citation: Oncology. 1996 Mar-Apr;53(2):118-26
references.pmid: 8604237
references.citation: Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011 Sep;43(9):1383-91
references.pmid: 21684348
references.citation: Biosci Rep. 2001 Aug;21(4):481-9
references.pmid: 11900323
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Dec;124(6):765-74
references.pmid: 9402822
references.citation: Exp Cell Res. 1998 Oct 10;244(1):184-95
references.pmid: 9770361
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 May;41(6):1316-26
references.pmid: 10798646
references.citation: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 May 17;84(10):838-42
references.pmid: 15200889
references.citation: Adv Dermatol. 2000;16:159-83; discussion 184
references.pmid: 11094627
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Jan;38(1):142-52
references.pmid: 9008639
references.citation: Cell Tissue Bank. 2004;5(3):161-75
references.pmid: 15509905
references.citation: Clin Sci (Lond). 1996 Aug;91(2):141-6
references.pmid: 8795436
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 5;97(25):13473-5
references.pmid: 11087834
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2000 Mar;114(3):408-12
references.pmid: 10692097
references.citation: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2010 Jan;46(1):54-9
references.pmid: 19915936
references.citation: Surv Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar-Apr;44(5):415-25
references.pmid: 10734241
references.citation: Sci China C Life Sci. 2007 Feb;50(1):101-10
references.pmid: 17393090
references.citation: Eye (Lond). 2006 Mar;20(3):351-7
references.pmid: 15877097
references.citation: Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;3(2):99-103
references.pmid: 3154588
references.citation: Curr Eye Res. 2003 Nov;27(5):323-8
references.pmid: 14562169