title: Enhancing clinical learning in the workplace: a qualitative study.
abstract: Workplace learning (WPL) is seen as an essential component of clinical veterinary education by the veterinary profession. This study sought to understand this type of learning experience more deeply. This was done utilising observations of students on intramural rotations (IMR) and interviews with students and clinical staff. WPL was seen as an opportunity for students to apply knowledge and develop clinical and professional skills in what is generally regarded as a safe, authentic environment. Clinical staff had clear ideas of what they expected from students in terms of interest, engagement, professionalism, and active participation, where this was appropriate. In contrast, students often did not know what to expect and sometimes felt under-prepared when entering the workplace, particularly in a new species area. With the support of staff acting as mentors, students learned to identify gaps in their knowledge and skills, which could then be addressed during specific IMR work placements. Findings such as these illustrate both the complexities of WPL and the diversity of different workplace settings encountered by the students.
authors.affiliation: Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK. kmagnier@rvc.ac.uk
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Magnier
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: V H M
authors.initials: VH
authors.lastname: Dale
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Murphy
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Hammond
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Mossop
authors.forename: S L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Freeman
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Pead
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002982:Clinical Clerkship / Q000379:methods*; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003625:Data Collection; D004520:Education, Veterinary / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D007858:Learning; D017145:Models, Educational; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D017132:Workplace
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Mar 15;326(7389):591-4
references.pmid: 12637408
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2010 Apr 05;10:28
references.pmid: 20367885
references.citation: Med Educ. 2010 May;44(5):449-58
references.pmid: 20518984
references.citation: Med Educ. 2005 Jul;39(7):704-12
references.pmid: 15960791
references.citation: Nurse Educ Today. 2004 May;24(4):248-55
references.pmid: 15110433
references.citation: J Vet Med Educ. 2008 Spring;35(1):11-3
references.pmid: 18339949
references.citation: Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10):970-8
references.pmid: 17895662
references.citation: Med Educ. 1979 Sep;13(5):336-41
references.pmid: 522684
references.citation: Med Educ. 2010 Jun;44(6):559-69
references.pmid: 20604852
references.citation: J Vet Med Educ. 2008 Fall;35(3):397-406
references.pmid: 19066357
references.citation: Med Educ. 2003 Jan;37(1):32-8
references.pmid: 12535113
references.citation: Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):830-7
references.pmid: 18564098
references.citation: Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(7):496-501
references.pmid: 15988643
references.citation: Med Educ. 2011 Jan;45(1):51-9
references.pmid: 21155868
references.citation: Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7:Article39
references.pmid: 21044039
references.citation: Vet Rec. 2011 Jul 2;169(1):13
references.pmid: 21697188