title: Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania.
abstract: Health care systems are faced with the challenge of resource scarcity and have insufficient resources to respond to all health problems and target groups simultaneously. Hence, priority setting is an inevitable aspect of every health system. However, priority setting is complex and difficult because the process is frequently influenced by political, institutional and managerial factors that are not considered by conventional priority-setting tools. In a five-year EU-supported project, which started in 2006, ways of strengthening fairness and accountability in priority setting in district health management were studied. This review is based on a PhD thesis that aimed to analyse health care organisation and management systems, and explore the potential and challenges of implementing Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R) approach to priority setting in Tanzania. A qualitative case study in Mbarali district formed the basis of exploring the sociopolitical and institutional contexts within which health care decision making takes place. The study also explores how the A4R intervention was shaped, enabled and constrained by the contexts. Key informant interviews were conducted. Relevant documents were also gathered and group priority-setting processes in the district were observed. The study revealed that, despite the obvious national rhetoric on decentralisation, actual practice in the district involved little community participation. The assumption that devolution to local government promotes transparency, accountability and community participation, is far from reality. The study also found that while the A4R approach was perceived to be helpful in strengthening transparency, accountability and stakeholder engagement, integrating the innovation into the district health system was challenging. This study underscores the idea that greater involvement and accountability among local actors may increase the legitimacy and fairness of priority-setting decisions. A broader and more detailed analysis of health system elements, and socio-cultural context is imperative in fostering sustainability. Additionally, the study stresses the need to deal with power asymmetries among various actors in priority-setting contexts.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Development Studies, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. stephenmaluka@yahoo.co.uk
authors.forename: Stephen Oswald
authors.initials: SO
authors.lastname: Maluka
mesh_terms: D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006292:Health Priorities; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D011057:Politics; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013636:Tanzania
references.citation: Health Policy. 1995 Apr-Jun;32(1-3):215-43
references.pmid: 10156640
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Spring;21(1):69-98
references.pmid: 8708343
references.citation: Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 Jul-Aug;24(4):27-9
references.pmid: 7960702
references.citation: CMAJ. 1997 Jul 15;157(2):163-7
references.pmid: 9238146
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(11):2355-62
references.pmid: 15950347
references.citation: BMJ. 1993 Jul 31;307(6899):309-11
references.pmid: 8374382
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jun;56(12):2433-41
references.pmid: 12742606
references.citation: Health Care Anal. 1996 May;4(2):146-56
references.pmid: 10162767
references.citation: Health Care Anal. 2007 Sep;15(3):159-67
references.pmid: 17922194
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(4):751-9
references.pmid: 20554365
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Oct 24;7:23
references.pmid: 19852834