title: Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy (DP) for benign and malignant diseases appears to offer advantages and is replacing open surgery in some centers. This review examined the evidence from published data of comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open DP.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Medline and PubMed databases were searched and relevant English language publications were systematically retrieved. Data were pooled by two independent reviewers. The results shown represent mean.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Up to December 2010, 13 comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open DP were identified of which two were excluded, leaving 503 and 588 patients respectively for analysis. The conversion rate was 9.5%. The groups were comparable for age and sex, whilst open surgery was associated with significantly higher incidence of malignant pathology (20.1 vs. 15.0%) and larger tumors (3.9 vs. 3.5 cm) compared with laparoscopic surgery. There were no differences between the two approaches with regard to the operative time (220 vs. 208 min), rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (16.1 vs. 19.5%), and mortality (0.6 vs. 0.5%). However, the laparoscopic approach was associated with significantly lower operative blood loss (237 vs. 562 ml), higher spleen preservation rate (37.8 vs. 8%), lower morbidity (30.5 vs. 38.4%), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (9.1 vs. 14.7 days).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The laparoscopic approach to DP offers advantages over open surgery with lower operative morbidity, higher spleen preservation rate, and shorter hospital stay; these benefits are particularly observed in patients with benign disease and borderline malignancy. The experience with laparoscopic DP for malignant disease remains limited, and long-term follow-up data are required to clearly define this role.
authors.affiliation: Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays Road, Crumpsall, Manchester, M8 5RB, UK.
authors.forename: Asri C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Jusoh
authors.forename: Basil J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Ammori
mesh_terms: D000700:Analgesics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D016063:Blood Loss, Surgical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D007902:Length of Stay; D059351:Organ Sparing Treatments / Q000379:methods; D010180:Pancreatectomy / Q000379:methods*; D010185:Pancreatic Fistula / Q000209:etiology; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000700:Analgesics
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Dec;11(12):1607-21; discussion 1621-2
references.pmid: 17896167
references.citation: Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):635-43; discussion 643-5
references.pmid: 19789022
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2005 May;92(5):539-46
references.pmid: 15852419
references.citation: Surgery. 2005 Jun;137(6):597-605
references.pmid: 15962401
references.citation: Am Surg. 2009 Aug;75(8):671-9; discussion 679-80
references.pmid: 19725289
references.citation: Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13
references.pmid: 16003309
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2002 Nov;236(5):612-8
references.pmid: 12409667
references.citation: Surgery. 2007 May;141(5):619-25
references.pmid: 17462461
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Sep;11(9):1120-5
references.pmid: 17623260
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;20(11):1729-32
references.pmid: 17024533
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2743-7
references.pmid: 19462202
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2010 Jul;145(7):616-21
references.pmid: 20644122
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2002 Feb;137(2):164-8
references.pmid: 11822953
references.citation: Chest. 1989 Feb;95(2 Suppl):2S-4S
references.pmid: 2914516
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jun;36(6):602-6
references.pmid: 7684667
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2261-8
references.pmid: 18528619
references.citation: HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(1):38-42
references.pmid: 18695757
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Jan;10(1):95-8
references.pmid: 16368497
references.citation: Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jan-Feb;54(73):265-71
references.pmid: 17419274
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Apr;196(4):556-64; discussion 564-5; author reply 565
references.pmid: 12691930
references.citation: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Jun;20(5):435-40
references.pmid: 20518689
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2008 Sep;248(3):438-46
references.pmid: 18791364
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):340-3
references.pmid: 18716530
references.citation: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(1):35-41
references.pmid: 19083146
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1991 Mar;126(3):359-64
references.pmid: 1998479
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):779-85, 786-7
references.pmid: 20421049
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Jul;12(7):1202-6
references.pmid: 18437500
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1334-8
references.pmid: 18027035
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2007 Jul;246(1):77-82
references.pmid: 17592294
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2003 Feb;90(2):190-6
references.pmid: 12555295