title: The roles of dimensionality, canopies and complexity in ecosystem monitoring.
abstract: Canopies are common among autotrophs, increasing their access to light and thereby increasing competitive abilities. If viewed from above canopies may conceal objects beneath them creating a 'canopy effect'. Due to complexities in collecting 3-dimensional data, most ecosystem monitoring programmes reduce dimensionality when sampling, resorting to planar views. The resultant 'canopy effects' may bias data interpretation, particularly following disturbances. Canopy effects are especially relevant on coral reefs where coral cover is often used to evaluate and communicate ecosystem health. We show that canopies hide benthic components including massive corals and algal turfs, and as planar views are almost ubiquitously used to monitor disturbances, the loss of vulnerable canopy-forming corals may bias findings by presenting pre-existing benthic components as an altered system. Our reliance on planar views in monitoring ecosystems, especially coral cover on reefs, needs to be reassessed if we are to better understand the ecological consequences of ever more frequent disturbances.
authors.affiliation: Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, and School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. christopher.goatley@jcu.edu.au
authors.forename: Christopher H R
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Goatley
authors.forename: David R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Bellwood
mesh_terms: D017753:Ecosystem; D004784:Environmental Monitoring
references.citation: Oecologia. 1976 Sep;25(3):199-210
references.pmid: 28308866
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Oct 1;15(10):413-417
references.pmid: 10998519
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Apr;14(4):341-8
references.pmid: 21320260
references.citation: Science. 1994 Sep 9;265(5178):1547-51
references.pmid: 17801530
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Mar 17;5(3):e9733
references.pmid: 20305808
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2008 Oct 23;4(5):490-3
references.pmid: 18628114
references.citation: Science. 2007 Dec 14;318(5857):1737-42
references.pmid: 18079392
references.citation: J Fish Biol. 2010 Jun;76(10):2578-83
references.pmid: 20557610
references.citation: Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1302-10
references.pmid: 17840770
references.citation: Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):243-53
references.pmid: 10821285
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep;5(9):e223
references.pmid: 17713985
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):5160-3
references.pmid: 16592298
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Nov 23;444(7118):477-80
references.pmid: 17122855
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2006 May;37(5):703-11
references.pmid: 16485162
references.citation: Oecologia. 1991 Feb;85(4):504-512
references.pmid: 28312497
references.citation: Mar Pollut Bull. 2003 Aug;46(8):1024-31
references.pmid: 12907196
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5239
references.pmid: 19384423
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jun 24;429(6994):827-33
references.pmid: 15215854
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2008 Dec;42(6):1091-100
references.pmid: 18446407
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 30;103(22):8425-9
references.pmid: 16709673