title: Variation in annual and lifetime reproductive success of lance-tailed manakins: alpha experience mitigates effects of senescence on siring success.
abstract: The causes of variation in individual reproductive success over a lifetime are not well understood. In long-lived vertebrates, reproductive output usually increases during early adulthood, but it is difficult to disentangle the roles of development and learning on this gain of reproductive success. Lekking lance-tailed manakins provide an opportunity to separate these processes, as the vast majority of male reproduction occurs after a bird obtains alpha status and maintains a display area in the lek, but the age at which males achieve alpha status varies widely. Using 11 years of longitudinal data on age, social status and genetic siring success, I assessed the factors influencing variation in siring success by individuals over their lifetimes. The data show increases in annual reproductive success with both age and alpha experience. At advanced ages, these gains were offset by senescence in fecundity. Individual ontogeny, rather than compositional change of the population, generated a nonlinear relationship of breeding tenure with lifetime success; age of assuming alpha status was unrelated to tenure as a breeder, or success in the alpha role. Importantly, these findings suggest that social experience can mitigate the negative effects of senescence in older breeders.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, 319 Stadium Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA. ehduval@bio.fsu.edu
authors.forename: Emily H
authors.initials: EH
authors.lastname: DuVal
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D000375:Aging; D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D046109:Passeriformes / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D012098:Reproduction; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal; D012930:Social Dominance
references.citation: Am Stat. 1985 Aug;39(3):176-85
references.pmid: 12267300
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Sep;14(10):3147-55
references.pmid: 16101780
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 11;108(2):674-9
references.pmid: 21199941
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2011 Mar;24(3):693-7
references.pmid: 21332857
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7841-6
references.pmid: 20378836
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Oct;14(10):1017-24
references.pmid: 21806745
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Sep;10(9):374-8
references.pmid: 21237076
references.citation: Evolution. 2004 Apr;58(4):880-5
references.pmid: 15154562
references.citation: Am Nat. 2006 May;167(5):766-73
references.pmid: 16671020
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2008 May;17(9):2287-99
references.pmid: 18410290
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
references.pmid: 19185386
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Sep 7;275(1646):1995-2003
references.pmid: 18495620
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Jan 17;415(6869):279-80
references.pmid: 11796996
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2009 May;22(5):983-96
references.pmid: 19298495
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 22;273(1591):1239-44
references.pmid: 16720397