title: Colour-grapheme synesthesia affects binocular vision.
abstract: In colour-grapheme synesthesia, non-coloured graphemes are perceived as being inherently coloured. In recent years, it is debated whether visual processing of synesthesia-inducing achromatic graphemes is similar to that of chromatic graphemes. Here, we exploit the phenomenon of binocular rivalry in which incompatible images presented dichoptically compete for conscious expression. Importantly, the competition only arises if the two images are sufficiently different; if the difference between the images is small, the images will fuse into a single mixed percept. We show that achromatic digits that induce synesthetic colour percepts increase the incidence of binocular rivalry compared to achromatic non-digits that do not evoke such percepts. That is, compared to achromatically perceived non-digits, synesthesia-inducing digits increase the predominance of binocular rivalry over binocular fusion. This finding shows that the synesthetic colour experience can provide the conditions for promoting binocular rivalry, much like stimulus features that induce rivalry in normal vision.
authors.affiliation: Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Chris L E
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Paffen
authors.forename: Maarten J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: van der Smagt
authors.forename: Tanja C W
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Nijboer
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2009;56(3):180-7
references.pmid: 19289360
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1158-73
references.pmid: 1431750
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Jun;119(3):468-75
references.pmid: 21316649
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004;44(14):1635-9
references.pmid: 15136000
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):752-6
references.pmid: 16984290
references.citation: Cortex. 2006 Feb;42(2):195-203
references.pmid: 16683493
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Mar;48(8):1018-26
references.pmid: 18316107
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):14499-503
references.pmid: 14612564
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 9;17(19):R834-5
references.pmid: 17925208
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 Sep 16;43(6):907-14
references.pmid: 15363400
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Apr;29(8):1703-10
references.pmid: 19419432
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Apr 18;380(6575):621-4
references.pmid: 8602261
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 7;268(1470):979-83
references.pmid: 11370973
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jan;3(1):13-21
references.pmid: 11823801
references.citation: Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):43-7
references.pmid: 20888854
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Mar 24;45(6):821-3
references.pmid: 15797543
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 24;93(26):15508-11
references.pmid: 8986842
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jan;96(1):145-67
references.pmid: 2648445
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2006 Feb;16(2):183-91
references.pmid: 15858161
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jun;10(6):792-7
references.pmid: 17515901
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Mar 29;410(6828):580-2
references.pmid: 11279495