title: Metastatic lymph nodes in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does size matter?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the diagnostic efficacy of the size criteria for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  LN metastasis is one of the most significant independent prognostic factors in patients with HCCA. Presently, in spite of the well known lack of sensitivity and specificity, one of the most used clinical criteria for nodal metastases is LN size.
  
  
  METHODS
  Pathological slides of 147 patients who had undergone exploration for HCCA were assessed. The size (maximum and short axis diameter) of each single node was retrieved from the pathology report or measured from a section on the glass slide using a stereo microscope and a calibrated ruler integrated in the software. When a metastatic lesion was detected, the proportion of the lesion in relation to LN size was estimated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Out of 147 patients, 645 LN were retrieved and measured. In all, 106 nodes (16%) showed evidence of metastasis. The proportion of positive nodes was 8% in nodes <5 mm and 37% in nodes >30 mm. Ten per cent of LN smaller than 10 mm were positive, whereas only 23% of LN larger than 10 mm were metastastically involved. No clear cut-off point could be found. Similar results were found for the short axis diameter. In 50% of positive LN, the metastatic lesion accounted for 10% or less of the LN size.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  No cut-off point could be determined for accurately predicting nodal involvement. Therefore, imaging studies should not rely on LN size when assessing nodal involvement.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Anthony T
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Ruys
authors.forename: Fiebo J W Ten
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Kate
authors.forename: Olivier R
authors.initials: OR
authors.lastname: Busch
authors.forename: Marc R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Engelbrecht
authors.forename: Dirk J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Gouma
authors.forename: Thomas M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: van Gulik
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001650:Bile Duct Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D001653:Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D018281:Cholangiocarcinoma / Q000556:secondary* / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008197:Lymph Node Excision; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D009426:Netherlands; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1999 Jan;229(1):76-83
references.pmid: 9923803
references.citation: Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Sep-Oct;16(5):1880-4
references.pmid: 17009986
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2003 Nov;238(5):720-7
references.pmid: 14578735
references.citation: J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul;40(7):739-43
references.pmid: 16082591
references.citation: J Surg Oncol. 1993 Dec;54(4):252-4
references.pmid: 8255087
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2008 Jan;95(1):92-6
references.pmid: 17853509
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1999 Mar;86(3):327-31
references.pmid: 10201773
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jul;52(7):1278-84
references.pmid: 19571705
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1996 Oct;224(4):463-73; discussion 473-5
references.pmid: 8857851
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1998 Jun;85(6):831-4
references.pmid: 9667718
references.citation: Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan;37(1):65-71
references.pmid: 21115233
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Feb;190(2):396-405
references.pmid: 18212225
references.citation: Surgery. 1994 Apr;115(4):445-51
references.pmid: 8165536
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2001 Mar;233(3):385-92
references.pmid: 11224627
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):675-81
references.pmid: 20224368
references.citation: Abdom Imaging. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):444-51
references.pmid: 17638040
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2491-9
references.pmid: 12815134
references.citation: Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar;67(3):438-43
references.pmid: 18061597
references.citation: Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep;18(9):2647-53
references.pmid: 21347792
references.citation: World J Surg. 2000 May;24(5):546-50
references.pmid: 10787074
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1999 Nov;230(5):663-71
references.pmid: 10561090
references.citation: Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Mar-Apr;46(26):977-80
references.pmid: 10370649
references.citation: Ann Surg Oncol. 1999 Sep;6(6):579-81
references.pmid: 10493627
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Aug;173(2):365-7
references.pmid: 10430138
references.citation: Surgery. 2002 Oct;132(4):555-63; discission 563-4
references.pmid: 12407338
references.citation: J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;45(5):560-6
references.pmid: 20035356
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Apr;168(4):985-9
references.pmid: 9124155
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):507-17; discussion 517-9
references.pmid: 11573044