title: Imaging in gout--what can we learn from MRI, CT, DECT and US?
abstract: There are many exciting new applications for advanced imaging in gout. These modalities employ multiplanar imaging and allow computerized three-dimensional rendering of bone and joints (including tophi) and have the advantage of electronic data storage for later retrieval. High-resolution computed tomography has been particularly helpful in exploring the pathology of gout by investigating the relationship between bone erosions and tophi. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography can image the inflammatory nature of gouty arthropathy, revealing synovial and soft tissue inflammation, and can provide information about the composition and vascularity of tophi. Dual-energy computerized tomography is a new modality that is able to identify tophi by their chemical composition and reveal even small occult tophaceous deposits. All modalities are being investigated for their potential roles in diagnosis and could have important clinical applications in the patient for whom aspiration of monosodium urate crystals from the joint is not possible. Imaging can also provide outcome measures, such as change in tophus volume, for monitoring the response to urate-lowering therapy and this is an important application in the clinical trial setting.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand. f.mcqueen@auckland.ac.nz
authors.forename: Fiona M
authors.initials: FM
authors.lastname: McQueen
authors.forename: Anthony
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Doyle
authors.forename: Nicola
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Dalbeth
mesh_terms: D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D006073:Gout / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods
references.citation: JAMA. 1979 Nov 30;242(22):2440-2
references.pmid: 490862
references.citation: Invest Radiol. 2008 Feb;43(2):112-9
references.pmid: 18197063
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):1072-8
references.pmid: 20308513
references.citation: Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2006 Jun;8(3):231-5
references.pmid: 16901082
references.citation: Eur J Radiol. 2007 Jun;62(3):437-43
references.pmid: 17234377
references.citation: Foot Ankle. 1982 May;2(6):325-31
references.pmid: 7047326
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Nov;69(11):1971-5
references.pmid: 20472589
references.citation: Rheumatol Int. 1987;7(5):187-93
references.pmid: 3321380
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Aug 15;57(6):1067-73
references.pmid: 17665492
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2011 Nov;38(11):2475-81
references.pmid: 21965640
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Jul;63(7):767-8
references.pmid: 15194569
references.citation: Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;21(2):124-31
references.pmid: 19339922
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Apr;70(4):597-604
references.pmid: 21216814
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Jan;61(1):52-4
references.pmid: 11779759
references.citation: Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Feb;25(4):282-9
references.pmid: 8834016
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Oct;68(10):1609-12
references.pmid: 19066180
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr 15;57(3):461-5
references.pmid: 17394233
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Nov;48(11):1442-6
references.pmid: 19745028
references.citation: Skeletal Radiol. 1984;11(1):1-8
references.pmid: 6710175
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug;36(8):1816-24
references.pmid: 19671819
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;36(10):2342-5
references.pmid: 19820223
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Sep;66(9):1216-20
references.pmid: 17392347
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 1998 Feb;25(2):198-9
references.pmid: 9489805
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug;36(8):1829-32
references.pmid: 19671821
references.citation: Neurology. 2009 Aug 4;73(5):404
references.pmid: 19652147
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 1983 May;26(5):696
references.pmid: 6847739
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jun;58(6):1854-65
references.pmid: 18512794
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2010 May;62(5):1549-56
references.pmid: 20131281
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Dec;34(12):1489-94
references.pmid: 1747133
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug;36(8):1811-5
references.pmid: 19671818
references.citation: Invest Radiol. 2007 Mar;42(3):196-203
references.pmid: 17287650
references.citation: Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;60(4):408-14
references.pmid: 16620352
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2003 Jun;30(6):1385-6
references.pmid: 12784422
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Feb;168(2):523-7
references.pmid: 9016240
references.citation: Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Mar;40(3):309-15
references.pmid: 20676636
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 May;63(5):473-7
references.pmid: 15082474
references.citation: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Feb;19(1):91-116
references.pmid: 15588973
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Jul;46(7):1116-21
references.pmid: 17468505
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2007 Sep;34(9):1888-93
references.pmid: 17659752
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Oct;65(10):1301-11
references.pmid: 16707533