title: Colorectal stents for the management of malignant colonic obstructions.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancer in the western world. Acute colonic obstruction is one of the common presentations of colon cancer. Emergency surgical decompression is the traditional treatment of choice but is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent years colonic stents have been used to relieve the obstruction.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The aim was to compare the colonic stenting versus emergency surgical decompression with regards to benefits and risks.
  
  
  METHODS
  Searches were carried out May 2010 in the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE and Ovid CINAHL.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised clinical trials comparing colonic stenting versus surgical decompression for obstructing colorectal cancers were considered for inclusion.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data on the characteristics of the trial, methodological quality of the trials, mortality, morbidity, technical and clinical success rate, operating time, hospital stay and other measured secondary outcomes from each trial were collected. And the data were analysed with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using RevMan Analysis. For each outcome, odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on available data analysis was calculated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Five randomised trials were identified with a total of 207 participants, 102 to colorectal stenting and 105 to emergency surgery. There was statistically significant higher clinical success rate in the emergency surgery group. The average time of clinical relief of obstruction was 0.66 day in the colonic stent group and was 3.55 days in the emergency surgery group. The stent insertion was successful in 86.02% of attempted stent placements. There was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day mortality between two groups. The 30 day mortality rate was similar, 2.3% in both groups. The stent related perforation rate was 5.88%. The stent migration rate was 2.13%. The stent obstruction rate was 2.13%. There was no statistically significant difference in overall complication rate in both groups. The complication rate was 39.22% in the colonic stent group and was 45.71% in the emergency surgery group. The mean hospital stay was 11.53 days in the colonic stent group and was 17.15 days in the emergency surgery group. The mean procedure/operating time was 113.93 minutes in the colonic stent group compared to 143.85 minutes in the emergency surgery group. The median blood loss was 50 ml in the colonic stent group and 350 ml in the emergency surgery group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of colonic stent in malignant colorectal obstruction seems to have no advantage over emergency surgery. The clinical success rate was statistically higher in emergency surgery group. However, use of colorectal stents seems to be as safe in the malignant colorectal obstruction as the emergency surgery with no statistically significant difference in the mortality and morbidity. Colorectal stents are associated with acceptable stent perforation, migration and obstruction rates. The advantages of colorectal stent includes shorter hospital stay and procedure time and less blood loss. However, due to the variability in the sample size and trial designs in the included studies, further randomised trials with bigger sample size and well defined trial design are needed to achieve the robust evidence.
authors.affiliation: 1Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Jsagar_2001@yahoo.com.
authors.forename: Jayesh
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sagar
mesh_terms: D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000150:complications*; D004630:Emergencies; D006801:Humans; D007415:Intestinal Obstruction / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D015607:Stents; D015996:Survival Rate
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
references.pmid: 3802833
references.citation: Lancet Oncol. 2011 Apr;12(4):344-52
references.pmid: 21398178
references.citation: Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jan;7(1):22-6
references.pmid: 15606580
references.citation: Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):184-91
references.pmid: 18322873
references.citation: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011 May;20(3):133-40
references.pmid: 20929424
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2009 Dec;144(12):1127-32
references.pmid: 20026830
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Mar;45(3):401-6
references.pmid: 12068202
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):421-6
references.pmid: 14735348
references.citation: World J Surg. 2009 Jun;33(6):1281-6
references.pmid: 19363580
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Jun;10(6):798-803
references.pmid: 16769535
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Oct;46(10 Suppl):S44-9
references.pmid: 14530657
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):670-4
references.pmid: 10480822
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2002 Sep;89(9):1096-102
references.pmid: 12190673
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct;99(10):2051-7
references.pmid: 15447772
references.citation: Ann Chir. 2005 Jun;130(5):331-5
references.pmid: 15935790
references.citation: Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):341-50
references.pmid: 3616287
references.citation: Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar;67(3):478-88
references.pmid: 18294511
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Nov;37(11):1158-9
references.pmid: 7956588
references.citation: BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
references.pmid: 9310563
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1994 Sep;81(9):1270-6
references.pmid: 7953385
references.citation: Colorectal Dis. 2000 Jul;2(4):233-7
references.pmid: 23578083
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2007 Feb;21(2):225-33
references.pmid: 17160651
references.citation: Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Dec;60(6):865-74
references.pmid: 15604999
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Aug;53(8):1190-6
references.pmid: 20628284
references.citation: Anticancer Res. 2004 Jan-Feb;24(1):269-71
references.pmid: 15015607
references.citation: Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jan;7(1):70-3
references.pmid: 15606589
references.citation: Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;20(12):779-85
references.pmid: 17171197