title: Facial attractiveness ratings from video-clips and static images tell the same story.
abstract: Most of what we know about what makes a face attractive and why we have the preferences we do is based on attractiveness ratings of static images of faces, usually photographs. However, several reports that such ratings fail to correlate significantly with ratings made to dynamic video clips, which provide richer samples of appearance, challenge the validity of this literature. Here, we tested the validity of attractiveness ratings made to static images, using a substantial sample of male faces. We found that these ratings agreed very strongly with ratings made to videos of these men, despite the presence of much more information in the videos (multiple views, neutral and smiling expressions and speech-related movements). Not surprisingly, given this high agreement, the components of video-attractiveness were also very similar to those reported previously for static-attractiveness. Specifically, averageness, symmetry and masculinity were all significant components of attractiveness rated from videos. Finally, regression analyses yielded very similar effects of attractiveness on success in obtaining sexual partners, whether attractiveness was rated from videos or static images. These results validate the widespread use of attractiveness ratings made to static images in evolutionary and social psychological research. We speculate that this validity may stem from our tendency to make rapid and robust judgements of attractiveness.
authors.affiliation: ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders & School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. gillian.rhodes@uwa.edu.au
authors.forename: Gillian
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Rhodes
authors.forename: Hanne C
authors.initials: HC
authors.lastname: Lie
authors.forename: Nishta
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Thevaraja
authors.forename: Libby
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Natasha
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Iredell
authors.forename: Christine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Curran
authors.forename: Shi Qin Claire
authors.initials: SQ
authors.lastname: Tan
authors.forename: Pia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Carnemolla
authors.forename: Leigh W
authors.initials: LW
authors.lastname: Simmons
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001504:Beauty; D004954:Esthetics; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D014743:Videotape Recording; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Oct;62(10):2473-86
references.pmid: 18691260
references.citation: Emotion. 2011 Dec;11(6):1379-87
references.pmid: 21604870
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1638-59
references.pmid: 21536551
references.citation: Emotion. 2005 Dec;5(4):498-502
references.pmid: 16366753
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;90(3):468-89
references.pmid: 16594832
references.citation: Vision Res. 2006 Apr;46(8-9):1282-91
references.pmid: 16356527
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Oct;16(10):759-62
references.pmid: 16181436
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226
references.pmid: 16318594
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):592-8
references.pmid: 16866745
references.citation: J Fam Psychol. 2007 Dec;21(4):726-35
references.pmid: 18179344
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jul;59(1):61-72
references.pmid: 2213490