title: Relevance of evolutionary history for food web structure.
abstract: Explaining the structure of ecosystems is one of the great challenges of ecology. Simple models for food web structure aim at disentangling the complexity of ecological interaction networks and detect the main forces that are responsible for their shape. Trophic interactions are influenced by species traits, which in turn are largely determined by evolutionary history. Closely related species are more likely to share similar traits, such as body size, feeding mode and habitat preference than distant ones. Here, we present a theoretical framework for analysing whether evolutionary history--represented by taxonomic classification--provides valuable information on food web structure. In doing so, we measure which taxonomic ranks better explain species interactions. Our analysis is based on partitioning of the species into taxonomic units. For each partition, we compute the likelihood that a probabilistic model for food web structure reproduces the data using this information. We find that taxonomic partitions produce significantly higher likelihoods than expected at random. Marginal likelihoods (Bayes factors) are used to perform model selection among taxonomic ranks. We show that food webs are best explained by the coarser taxonomic ranks (kingdom to class). Our methods provide a way to explicitly include evolutionary history in models for food web structure.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. aeklof@uchicago.edu
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Eklöf
authors.forename: Matthew R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Helmus
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Allesina
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017691:Caribbean Region; D005399:Fishes / Q000145:classification; D020387:Food Chain; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010802:Phylogeny
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Feb 26;427(6977):835-9
references.pmid: 14985761
references.citation: Science. 2008 May 2;320(5876):658-61
references.pmid: 18451301
references.citation: Evolution. 2003 Apr;57(4):717-45
references.pmid: 12778543
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1998 Jul 21;193(2):345-358
references.pmid: 9735264
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2011 Jun 21;279(1):161-8
references.pmid: 20633565
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Aug;12(8):779-88
references.pmid: 19490028
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2002 May 7;216(1):73-84
references.pmid: 12076129
references.citation: Am Nat. 2006 Jul;168(1):E1-14
references.pmid: 16874610
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Oct;11(10):995-1003
references.pmid: 18673385
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 2006 Jun;62(6):772-84
references.pmid: 16752215
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Dec;7(12):e1002321
references.pmid: 22219719
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 12;103(50):19015-20
references.pmid: 17146055
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Jul;12(7):652-62
references.pmid: 19453619
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 15;24(18):2098-100
references.pmid: 18678590
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Mar 9;404(6774):180-3
references.pmid: 10724169
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2011 Feb 21;271(1):106-13
references.pmid: 21144853
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Feb;89(2):567-80
references.pmid: 18409445
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 29;354(1392):1951-9
references.pmid: 10670015
references.citation: Am Nat. 2007 Mar;169(3):E68-83
references.pmid: 17230400
references.citation: J R Soc Interface. 2010 Dec 6;7(53):1735-43
references.pmid: 20462875
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Aug 23;448(7156):925-8
references.pmid: 17713534
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 18;105(11):4191-6
references.pmid: 18337512
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2006 Aug 7;241(3):552-63
references.pmid: 16466654