title: Patient-doctor depth-of-relationship scale: development and validation.
abstract: PURPOSE Because patient-doctor continuity has been measured in its longitudinal rather than its personal dimension, evidence to show that seeing the same doctor leads to better patient care is weak. Existing relational measures of patient-doctor continuity are limited, so we developed a new patient self-completion instrument designed to specifically measure patient-doctor depth of relationship. METHODS Draft versions of the questionnaire were tested with patients in face-to-face interviews and 2 rounds of pilot testing. The final instrument was completed by patients attending routine appointments with their general practitioner, and some were sent a follow-up questionnaire. Scale structure, validity, and reliability were assessed. RESULTS Face validity of candidate items was confirmed in interviews with 11 patients. Data from the pilot rounds 1 (n = 375) and 2 (n = 154) were used to refine and shorten the questionnaire. The final instrument comprised a single scale of 8 items and had good internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .93). In the main study (N = 490), seeing the same doctor was associated with deep patient-doctor relationships, but the relationship appeared to be nonlinear (overall adjusted odds ratio = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8). Test-retest reliability in a sample of participants (n = 154) was good (intracluster correlation coefficient 0.87; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97). CONCLUSIONS The Patient-Doctor Depth-of-Relationship Scale is a novel, conceptually grounded questionnaire that is easy for patients to complete and is psychometrically robust. Future research will further establish its validity and answer whether patient-doctor depth of relationship is associated with improved patient care.
authors.affiliation: School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, England, UK. m.ridd@bristol.ac.uk
authors.forename: Matthew J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Ridd
authors.forename: Glyn
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lewis
authors.forename: Tim J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Peters
authors.forename: Chris
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Salisbury
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D016015:Logistic Models; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016017:Odds Ratio; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
references.pmid: 2868172
references.citation: Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):445-51
references.pmid: 15506579
references.citation: Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36(1):22-7
references.pmid: 14710325
references.citation: Fam Med. 2001 Jan;33(1):22-7
references.pmid: 11199905
references.citation: Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-66
references.pmid: 15798043
references.citation: Fam Pract. 2005 Feb;22(1):15-9
references.pmid: 15640289
references.citation: BMJ. 1996 Oct 5;313(7061):841-4
references.pmid: 8870568
references.citation: Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;50(2):115-28
references.pmid: 15293429
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21
references.pmid: 14630762
references.citation: BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Feb 20;9:13
references.pmid: 18289385
references.citation: Fam Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;20(5):333-7
references.pmid: 3266158
references.citation: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 Mar-Apr;26(2):115-20
references.pmid: 15038928
references.citation: BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1870-3
references.pmid: 9224130
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):787-93
references.pmid: 17431698
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Sep;44(386):395-9
references.pmid: 8790651
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):738-43
references.pmid: 10487999
references.citation: Fam Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;22(5):361-4
references.pmid: 2227171
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;32(5):840-6
references.pmid: 14559762
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):i-iv, 1-74
references.pmid: 9812244
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Dec;40(341):487-90
references.pmid: 2282225
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Apr;59(561):e116-33
references.pmid: 19341547