title: Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness practices among women in rural Uganda.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Improving knowledge of obstetric danger signs and promoting birth preparedness practices are strategies aimed at enhancing utilization of skilled care in low-income countries. The aim of the study was to explore the association between knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness among recently delivered women in south-western Uganda.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study included 764 recently delivered women from 112 villages in Mbarara district. Community survey methods were used and 764 recently delivered women from 112 villages in Mbarara district were included in study. Interviewer administered questionnaire were used to collect data. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between knowledge of key danger signs and birth preparedness.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty two percent of women knew at least one key danger sign during pregnancy, 72% during delivery and 72% during postpartum. Only 19% had knowledge of 3 or more key danger signs during the three periods. Of the four birth preparedness practices; 91% had saved money, 71% had bought birth materials, 61% identified a health professional and 61% identified means of transport. Overall 35% of the respondents were birth prepared. The relationship between knowledge of at least one key danger sign during pregnancy or during postpartum and birth preparedness showed statistical significance which persisted after adjusting for probable confounders (OR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.6) and (OR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2-3.0) respectively. Young age and high levels of education had synergistic effect on the relationship between knowledge and birth preparedness. The associations between knowledge of at least one key danger sign during childbirth or knowledge that prolonged labour was a key danger sign and birth preparedness were not statistically significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The prevalence of recently delivered women who had knowledge of key danger signs or those who were birth prepared was very low. Since the majority of women attend antenatal care sessions, the quality and methods of delivery of antenatal care education require review so as to improve its effectiveness. Universal primary and secondary education programmes ought to be promoted so as to enhance the impact of knowledge of key danger signs on birth preparedness practices.
authors.affiliation: Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, CRC, Entrance 72, 205 02 Malmo, Sweden. jerome.kabakyenga@med.lu.se
authors.forename: Jerome K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Kabakyenga
authors.forename: Per-Olof
authors.initials: PO
authors.lastname: Östergren
authors.forename: Eleanor
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Turyakira
authors.forename: Karen O
authors.initials: KO
authors.lastname: Pettersson
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D036861:Delivery, Obstetric / Q000523:psychology; D003906:Developing Countries; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007744:Obstetric Labor Complications / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D011247:Pregnancy; D011295:Prenatal Care / Q000523:psychology; D012423:Rural Health / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014454:Uganda; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 Mar 07;8:9
references.pmid: 18325122
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21432
references.pmid: 21731747
references.citation: AIDS Behav. 2010 Dec;14(6):1347-52
references.pmid: 20700644
references.citation: East Afr Med J. 2000 Oct;77(10):558-61
references.pmid: 12862125
references.citation: Lancet. 2010 May 8;375(9726):1609-23
references.pmid: 20382417
references.citation: Plan Parent Chall. 1998;(1):13-4
references.pmid: 12293647
references.citation: Health Millions. 2000 May-Jun;26(3):34-7
references.pmid: 12296216
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Mar 26;9:12
references.pmid: 19323836
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(5):399-406
references.pmid: 10361757
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Oct 14;11:73
references.pmid: 21995340
references.citation: J Health Popul Nutr. 2010 Aug;28(4):383-91
references.pmid: 20824982
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 Sep 30;368(9542):1130-2
references.pmid: 17011924
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(8):1091-110
references.pmid: 8042057
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Oct 13;370(9595):1311-9
references.pmid: 17933645
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jan;50(2):203-13
references.pmid: 10619690
references.citation: J Health Popul Nutr. 2006 Dec;24(4):489-97
references.pmid: 17591346
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Jul;13 Suppl 1:6-13
references.pmid: 18578807
references.citation: East Afr Med J. 2008 Jun;85(6):275-83
references.pmid: 18817024
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD002869
references.pmid: 17636711
references.citation: Birth. 2003 Dec;30(4):227-34
references.pmid: 14992153
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Feb;88(2):181-93
references.pmid: 15694106
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Jun;11(6):951-4
references.pmid: 16772018