title: The importance of a multifaceted approach to characterizing the microbial flora of chronic wounds.
abstract: Chronic wounds contain complex polymicrobial communities of sessile organisms that have been underappreciated because of limitations of standard culture techniques. The aim of this work was to combine recently developed next-generation investigative techniques to comprehensively describe the microbial characteristics of chronic wounds. Tissue samples were obtained from 15 patients with chronic wounds presenting to the Johns Hopkins Wound Center. Standard bacteriological cultures demonstrated an average of three common bacterial species in wound samples. By contrast, high-throughput pyrosequencing revealed increased bacterial diversity with an average of 17 genera in each wound. Data from microbial community profiling of chronic wounds were compared with published sequenced analyses of bacteria from normal skin. Increased proportions of anaerobes, Gram-negative rods and Gram-positive cocci were found in chronic wounds. In addition, chronic wounds had significantly lower populations of Propionibacterium compared with normal skin. Using epifluorescence microscopy, wound bacteria were visualized in highly organized thick confluent biofilms or as scattered individual bacterial cells. Fluorescent in situ hybridization allowed for the visualization of Staphylococcus aureus cells in a wound sample. Quorum-sensing molecules were measured by bioassay to evaluate signaling patterns among bacteria in the wounds. A range of autoinducer-2 activities was detected in the wound samples. Collectively, these data provide new insights into the identity, organization, and behavior of bacteria in chronic wounds. Such information may provide important clues to effective future strategies in wound healing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ahan3@jhmi.edu
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Han
authors.forename: Jonathan M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Zenilman
authors.forename: Johan H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Melendez
authors.forename: Mark E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Shirtliff
authors.forename: Alessandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Agostinho
authors.forename: Garth
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: James
authors.forename: Philip S
authors.initials: PS
authors.lastname: Stewart
authors.forename: Emmanuel F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Mongodin
authors.forename: Dhana
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Rao
authors.forename: Alexander H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Rickard
authors.forename: Gerald S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Lazarus
mesh_terms: D001419:Bacteria / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D001431:Bacteriological Techniques; D018441:Biofilms / Q000254:growth & development; D002908:Chronic Disease; D006801:Humans; D017404:In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; D018613:Microscopy, Confocal; D008856:Microscopy, Fluorescence; D053038:Quorum Sensing; D014945:Wound Healing; D014946:Wound Infection / Q000382:microbiology; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000382:microbiology*
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 2005 Jul 4;579(17):3713-7
references.pmid: 15963993
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2010 May;108(5):1509-22
references.pmid: 19840177
references.citation: Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Jan;49(1):44-53
references.pmid: 12532033
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
references.pmid: 17586664
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4680-7
references.pmid: 20534435
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 20;104(8):2927-32
references.pmid: 17293459
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 2010 Aug;156(Pt 8):2271-2282
references.pmid: 20488878
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2009 Aug 1;81(15):6374-81
references.pmid: 19594136
references.citation: Clin Dermatol. 2010 Sep-Oct;28(5):519-26
references.pmid: 20797512
references.citation: Nat Prod Rep. 2010 Mar;27(3):343-69
references.pmid: 20179876
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49:711-45
references.pmid: 8561477
references.citation: Adv Microb Physiol. 2002;46:202-56
references.pmid: 12073654
references.citation: Science. 2009 May 29;324(5931):1190-2
references.pmid: 19478181
references.citation: Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):763-71
references.pmid: 19903300
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Mar 15;244(2):297-304
references.pmid: 15766782
references.citation: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:319-46
references.pmid: 16212498
references.citation: Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004 Apr;17(2):91-6
references.pmid: 15021046
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Feb;2(2):95-108
references.pmid: 15040259
references.citation: Wound Repair Regen. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):30-6
references.pmid: 18211577
references.citation: Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009 Jul 14;54(2):65-84
references.pmid: 19594442
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2008 Mar;5(3):235-7
references.pmid: 18264105
references.citation: Contrib Microbiol. 2009;16:18-32
references.pmid: 19494577
references.citation: BMC Microbiol. 2008 Jan 08;8:4
references.pmid: 18182108
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Dec;16(12):1762-9
references.pmid: 21077984
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2003 Aug;185(16):4851-60
references.pmid: 12897005
references.citation: BMC Microbiol. 2008 Mar 06;8:43
references.pmid: 18325110
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2005 Jan;187(1):238-48
references.pmid: 15601708
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2010 Dec 1;24(23):2603-14
references.pmid: 21123647
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1997 Jun;179(12):4043-5
references.pmid: 9190823
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Feb;39(2):485-93
references.pmid: 11158094
references.citation: Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jan;61(1):20-4
references.pmid: 4588085
references.citation: J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Feb;55(2):143-9
references.pmid: 15649989
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Apr;15(2):167-93
references.pmid: 11932229
references.citation: Infect Immun. 2006 Mar;74(3):1673-82
references.pmid: 16495538
references.citation: Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Mar-Apr;17(2):163-72
references.pmid: 19320883