title: Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: the extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry.
abstract: Performance in visual tasks is limited by the low-level mechanisms that sample the visual field. It is well documented that contrast sensitivity and spatial resolution decrease as a function of eccentricity and that those factors impair performance in "higher level" tasks, such as visual search. Performance also varies consistently at isoeccentric locations in the visual field. Specifically, at a fixed eccentricity, performance is better along the horizontal meridian than the vertical meridian, and along the lower than the upper vertical meridian. Whether these asymmetries in visual performance fields are confined to the vertical meridian or extend across the whole upper versus lower visual hemifield has been a matter of debate. Here, we measure the extent of the upper versus lower asymmetry. Results reveal that this asymmetry is most pronounced at the vertical meridian and that it decreases gradually as the angular distance (polar angle) from the vertical meridian increases, with eccentricity held constant. Beyond 30° of polar angle from the vertical meridian, the upper to lower asymmetry is no longer reliable. Thus, the vertical meridian is uniquely asymmetric and uniquely insensitive. This pattern of results is consistent with early anatomical properties of the visual system and reflects constraints that are critical to our understanding of visual information processing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA. jared.abrams@nyu.edu
authors.forename: Jared
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Abrams
authors.forename: Aaron
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Nizam
authors.forename: Marisa
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Carrasco
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011594:Psychometrics; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Science. 1996 Feb 2;271(5249):651-3
references.pmid: 8571128
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1989;4(1):45-62
references.pmid: 2486925
references.citation: Science. 1962 Dec 21;138(3547):1327-8
references.pmid: 14019856
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1988 May;8(5):1531-68
references.pmid: 3367210
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Oct;9(10):1243-5
references.pmid: 16964254
references.citation: Vision Res. 1994 Sep;34(18):2453-67
references.pmid: 7975284
references.citation: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1983 Apr;61(2):171-82
references.pmid: 6880630
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):356-78
references.pmid: 7740093
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1539-47
references.pmid: 10788657
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1997 Dec;35(12):1513-7
references.pmid: 9460720
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1979;37(3):475-94
references.pmid: 520438
references.citation: Spat Vis. 2004;17(4-5):269-93
references.pmid: 15559106
references.citation: Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8
references.pmid: 5437004
references.citation: Spat Vis. 2004;17(4-5):295-325
references.pmid: 15559107
references.citation: Hum Neurobiol. 1985;4(2):97-9
references.pmid: 4030428
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Jan;48(1):127-35
references.pmid: 18067943
references.citation: Vision Res. 1989;29(9):1133-51
references.pmid: 2617861
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Jun;131(2):194-205
references.pmid: 12049239
references.citation: J Vis. 2006 Nov 08;6(11):1294-306
references.pmid: 17209736
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1351-65
references.pmid: 15066395
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1314-29
references.pmid: 11800459
references.citation: Science. 1943 Jun 25;97(2530):586-7
references.pmid: 17734284
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216
references.pmid: 11689021
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Nov;71(8):1782-92
references.pmid: 19933562
references.citation: Vision Res. 2005 Oct;45(21):2820-30
references.pmid: 16051308
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983 Jun;24(6):754-9
references.pmid: 6853102
references.citation: Vision Res. 1998 Feb;38(3):347-74
references.pmid: 9536360
references.citation: Vision Res. 1992 Apr;32(4):771-7
references.pmid: 1413560
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):387-91
references.pmid: 15772663
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5363-7
references.pmid: 11309485
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Aug;47(17):2327-36
references.pmid: 17662333
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
references.pmid: 5541744
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Jun;22(3):738-57
references.pmid: 8666961
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 9;29(36):11149-52
references.pmid: 19741121
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24470
references.pmid: 21931727
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Apr 17;9(4):13.1-17
references.pmid: 19757922
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):699-700
references.pmid: 12819786
references.citation: Vision Res. 1974 Dec;14(12):1497-8
references.pmid: 4446384
references.citation: Vision Res. 1997 Jan;37(1):63-82
references.pmid: 9068831
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Oct;26(5):1534-48
references.pmid: 11039483
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 Jun 01;10(6):26
references.pmid: 20884575
references.citation: J Vis. 2004 Feb 02;4(1):22-31
references.pmid: 14995896
references.citation: Hum Factors. 2006 Winter;48(4):774-84
references.pmid: 17240724
references.citation: J Vis. 2002;2(6):467-79
references.pmid: 12678645
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1995 Nov;57(8):1241-61
references.pmid: 8539099
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Sep;43(19):2029-38
references.pmid: 12842156
references.citation: Science. 1987 May 1;236(4801):579-82
references.pmid: 3576186
references.citation: Vision Res. 1999 Mar;39(6):1171-5
references.pmid: 10343833
references.citation: Vision Res. 1992 Jul;32(7):1349-57
references.pmid: 1455707
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004;44(13):1589-600
references.pmid: 15126067
references.citation: Vision Res. 1985;25(12):1795-810
references.pmid: 3832605
references.citation: Perception. 1990;19(6):759-66
references.pmid: 2130373
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982 Nov;23(5):666-70
references.pmid: 7129811
references.citation: J Vis. 2004 Dec 30;4(12):1136-69
references.pmid: 15669917
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1987 Dec 22;266(4):535-55
references.pmid: 2449473
references.citation: J Vis. 2011 Jan 21;11(1):18
references.pmid: 21257707
references.citation: Perception. 2008;37(5):747-64
references.pmid: 18605148
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references.pmid: 9176953
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1990 Feb 22;292(4):497-523
references.pmid: 2324310
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1293-313
references.pmid: 11800458
references.citation: Am J Physiol. 1946 Apr;146:21-5
references.pmid: 21023291
references.citation: Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Mar;69(3):171-4
references.pmid: 1565412
references.citation: Vision Res. 1984;24(5):429-48
references.pmid: 6740964
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1984 Jul 10;226(4):544-64
references.pmid: 6747034
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):714-22
references.pmid: 12613674
references.citation: Vision Res. 1980;20(3):235-41
references.pmid: 7385597
references.citation: Vision Res. 2002 Apr;42(8):949-67
references.pmid: 11934448
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 May 30;7(7):9.1-12
references.pmid: 17685805
references.citation: Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(7):735-45
references.pmid: 19385088
references.citation: Vision Res. 1989;29(11):1607-19
references.pmid: 2635484
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1227-68
references.pmid: 10788638
references.citation: J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 May;41(3A):359-72
references.pmid: 15543452
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 May 1;23(9):3771-89
references.pmid: 12736348
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Vision Res. 1971 Jun;11(6):563-76
references.pmid: 5558576
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 Jan 24;8(1):16.1-16
references.pmid: 18318619
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Sep 26;383(6598):334-7
references.pmid: 8848045
references.citation: Vision Res. 1990;30(3):497-501
references.pmid: 2336807
references.citation: Vision Res. 1981;21(3):409-18
references.pmid: 7269319
references.citation: Perception. 2005;34(1):87-107
references.pmid: 15773609
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1990 Oct 1;300(1):5-25
references.pmid: 2229487
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):897-903
references.pmid: 21691926
references.citation: Spat Vis. 2001;15(1):61-75
references.pmid: 11893125
references.citation: Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1286-94
references.pmid: 19138697
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1999;12(1):51-72
references.pmid: 10195388
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 Mar 07;8(3):4.1-14
references.pmid: 18484810
references.citation: J Vis. 2002;2(1):25-45
references.pmid: 12678595