title: A mechanism for reducing delay discounting by altering temporal attention.
abstract: Rewards that are not immediately available are discounted compared to rewards that are immediately available. The more a person discounts a delayed reward, the more likely that person is to have a range of behavioral problems, including clinical disorders. This latter observation has motivated the search for interventions that reduce discounting. One surprisingly simple method to reduce discounting is an "explicit-zero" reframing that states default or null outcomes. Reframing a classical discounting choice as "something now but nothing later" versus "nothing now but more later" decreases discount rates. However, it is not clear how this "explicit-zero" framing intervention works. The present studies delineate and test two possible mechanisms to explain the phenomenon. One mechanism proposes that the explicit-zero framing creates the impression of an improving sequence, thereby enhancing the present value of the delayed reward. A second possible mechanism posits an increase in attention allocation to temporally distant reward representations. In four experiments, we distinguish between these two hypothesized mechanisms and conclude that the temporal attention hypothesis is superior for explaining our results. We propose a model of temporal attention whereby framing affects intertemporal preferences by modifying present bias.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
authors.forename: Peter T
authors.initials: PT
authors.lastname: Radu
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Yi
authors.forename: Warren K
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Bickel
authors.forename: James J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Gross
authors.forename: Samuel M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: McClure
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008960:Models, Psychological; D012201:Reward; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Addiction. 1998 May;93(5):729-38
references.pmid: 9692271
references.citation: Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):503-7
references.pmid: 15486304
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 8;45(7):1363-77
references.pmid: 17126370
references.citation: Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Apr;6(2):349-55
references.pmid: 15203808
references.citation: Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):415-28
references.pmid: 17516818
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2010 Jul 14;100(5):438-45
references.pmid: 20435052
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;19(7):648-9
references.pmid: 18727778
references.citation: NIDA Res Monogr. 1993;137:123-46
references.pmid: 8289917
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;20(7):799-804
references.pmid: 19493322
references.citation: J Dual Diagn. 2009 Apr 1;5(2):131-138
references.pmid: 20182654
references.citation: Arch Neurol. 2007 Nov;64(11):1575-9
references.pmid: 17998440
references.citation: Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;17(8):651-67
references.pmid: 17110792
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1975 Jul;82(4):463-96
references.pmid: 1099599
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;162(8):1414-22
references.pmid: 16055762
references.citation: Addiction. 1994 Mar;89(3):283-93
references.pmid: 8173494
references.citation: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Aug 1;96(3):256-62
references.pmid: 18468814
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Feb 1;69(3):260-5
references.pmid: 20965498
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Mar;128(1):78-87
references.pmid: 10100392
references.citation: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;14(3):311-7
references.pmid: 16893274
references.citation: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jan 1;106(1):52-5
references.pmid: 19748191
references.citation: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;15(2):176-86
references.pmid: 17469941
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1369-80
references.pmid: 12948695
references.citation: J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Summer;42(2):269-75
references.pmid: 19949514
references.citation: J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):101-22
references.pmid: 11317983
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2001 Aug;43(1):1-22
references.pmid: 11487292
references.citation: Psychol Rec. 2008 Spring;58(2):163-174
references.pmid: 23825867
references.citation: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Oct 1;104(3):197-203
references.pmid: 19570621
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1999 Jan;106(1):3-19
references.pmid: 10197361
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Aug;110(3):482-7
references.pmid: 11502091
references.citation: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Sep;90 Suppl 1:S85-91
references.pmid: 17101239
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Mar;190(4):485-96
references.pmid: 17205320
references.citation: Addiction. 2001 Jan;96(1):73-86
references.pmid: 11177521
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 May 23;27(21):5796-804
references.pmid: 17522323
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):233-44
references.pmid: 2037827
references.citation: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2001 Dec;29(6):541-56
references.pmid: 11761287
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Aug;205(2):305-18
references.pmid: 19390842
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1971 Dec;35(6):430-41
references.pmid: 5143310
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):49-57
references.pmid: 17188554
references.citation: Neuron. 2010 Apr 15;66(1):138-48
references.pmid: 20399735