title: Translaminar screws of the axis--an alternative technique for rigid screw fixation in upper cervical spine instability.
abstract: C2 pedicle screws or transarticular atlantoaxial screws are technically demanding and carry an increased risk of vertebral artery injury. In up to 20% of cases, pedicle and transarticular screw placement is not possible due to a high-riding vertebral artery or very small C2 pedicles in addition to other anatomical variations. Translaminar screws have been reported to rigidly capture posterior elements of C2 and therefore appear to be a suitable alternative. We present our first experiences and clinical results with this new method in two neurosurgical spine centers. Twenty-seven adult patients were treated between 2007 and 2010 in two neurosurgical spine departments with C2 translaminar screw fixation for upper cervical spine instability of various origins (e.g., trauma, tumor, dens pseudarthrosis). Eight patients were men and 19 were women. Mean age was 68.9 years. In most cases, translaminar screws were used because of contraindications for pedicle or transarticular screws as a salvage technique. All patients were clinically assessed and had CT scans postoperatively to verify correct screw placement. Follow-up was performed with reexamination on an ambulatory basis. Mean follow-up was 7.6 months for all patients. In 27 patients, 52 translaminar screws were placed. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, we identified four screw malpositions using a new accuracy grading scale. One screw had to be revised because of violation of the spinal canal >4 mm. None of the patients had additional neurological deficits postoperatively, and all showed stable cervical conditions at follow-up. Two patients died due to causes not associated with the stabilization technique. The fusion rate for patients with C1/C2 fixation is 92.9%. Translaminar screws can be used at least as an additional technique for cases of upper cervical spine instability when pedicle screw placement is contraindicated or not possible. The current data suggest comparable biomechanical stability and fusion rates of translaminar screws to other well-known posterior fixation procedures. In addition, translaminar screw placement is technically less demanding and reduces the risk of vertebral artery injury.
authors.affiliation: Neurosurgical Department, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Steinweg 13-17, 26122 Oldenburg, Germany. d.meyer@sjs-del.de
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Meyer
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Meyer
authors.forename: Th
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kretschmer
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Börm
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001368:Axis, Cervical Vertebra / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery*; D001863:Bone Screws; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005592:Fracture Fixation / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011542:Pseudarthrosis / Q000601:surgery; D013122:Spinal Diseases / Q000150:complications; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014711:Vertebral Artery / Q000601:surgery
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Nov;3(5):409-14
references.pmid: 16302639
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1998 Apr;88(4):634-40
references.pmid: 9525707
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 1;30(13):1513-8
references.pmid: 15990665
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Mar;(408):162-6
references.pmid: 12616054
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Oct;5(4):336-42
references.pmid: 17048771
references.citation: Spine J. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):656-60
references.pmid: 17938004
references.citation: Spine J. 2007 Nov-Dec;7(6):682-8
references.pmid: 17434809
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3):516-21; discussion 516-21
references.pmid: 16528192
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Apr;17(2):158-62
references.pmid: 15260101
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2767-71
references.pmid: 17108826
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jul 1;31(15):E513-7
references.pmid: 16816753
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul;59(1 Suppl 1):ONS84-8; discussion ONS84-8
references.pmid: 16888557
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 20;33(9):960-5
references.pmid: 18427316
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2007 Nov;61(5 Suppl 2):311-5; discussion 315-6
references.pmid: 18091245
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2010 Aug;19(8):1312-7
references.pmid: 20524135
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Dec;5(6):554
references.pmid: 17176023
references.citation: Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2004;71(1):6-12
references.pmid: 15069856
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2008 Apr;17(4):610-5
references.pmid: 18034268
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2009 May;64(5 Suppl 2):343-8; discussion 348-9
references.pmid: 19404112
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Nov 15;26(22):2467-71
references.pmid: 11707712
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1997 Jun;86(6):961-8
references.pmid: 9171174
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jan 1;36(1):E33-7
references.pmid: 21192213
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jan 15;24(2):107-13
references.pmid: 9926378
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 15;35(11):1136-43
references.pmid: 20118834