title: Invasive rats and recent colonist birds partially compensate for the loss of endemic New Zealand pollinators.
abstract: Reported declines of pollinator populations around the world have led to increasing concerns about the consequences for pollination as a critical ecosystem function and service. Pollination could be maintained through compensation if remaining pollinators increase their contribution or if novel species are recruited as pollinators, but empirical evidence of this compensation is so far lacking. Using a natural experiment in New Zealand where endemic vertebrate pollinators still occur on one offshore island reserve despite their local extinction on the adjacent North Island, we investigated whether compensation could maintain pollination in the face of pollinator extinctions. We show that two recently arrived species in New Zealand, the invasive ship rat (Rattus rattus) and the recent colonist silvereye (Zosterops lateralis; a passerine bird), at least partly maintain pollination for three forest plant species in northern New Zealand, and without this compensation, these plants would be significantly more pollen-limited. This study provides empirical evidence that widespread non-native species can play an important role in maintaining ecosystem functions, a role that needs to be assessed when planning invasive species control or eradication programmes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. david.pattemore@plantandfood.co.nz
authors.forename: David E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Pattemore
authors.forename: David S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Wilcove
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D053476:Extinction, Biological; D058865:Introduced Species; D027822:Myrtaceae / Q000502:physiology; D009520:New Zealand; D046109:Passeriformes / Q000502:physiology*; D010943:Plantago / Q000502:physiology; D054817:Pollination; D011157:Population Dynamics; D039105:Proteaceae / Q000502:physiology; D051381:Rats
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):468-79
references.pmid: 21352450
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2006 Feb;93(2):271-7
references.pmid: 21646188
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Apr;21(4):208-16
references.pmid: 16701087
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Feb;88(2):271-81
references.pmid: 17479745
references.citation: Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):804-8
references.pmid: 11679658
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 22;271(1557):2605-11
references.pmid: 15615687
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
references.pmid: 17164193
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2000 Sep;87(9):1265-71
references.pmid: 10991897
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Dec;8(12):452-7
references.pmid: 21236227
references.citation: Science. 2011 Feb 25;331(6020):1068-71
references.pmid: 21292938
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2009 Nov;104(6):1017-43
references.pmid: 19789175
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Mar;12(3):104-8
references.pmid: 21237993
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Aug;21(8):464-71
references.pmid: 16762448
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Nov;24(11):599-605
references.pmid: 19683830
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):229-37
references.pmid: 18796401
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Dec;8(12):447-51
references.pmid: 21236226
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2010 Dec;13(12):1459-74
references.pmid: 20955506