title: The risk of radiation exposure to the eyes of the interventional pain physician.
abstract: It is widely accepted that the use of medical imaging continues to grow across the globe as does the concern for radiation safety. The danger of lens opacities and cataract formation related to radiation exposure is well documented in the medical literature. However, there continues to be controversy regarding actual dose thresholds of radiation exposure and whether these thresholds are still relevant to cataract formation. Eye safety and the risk involved for the interventional pain physician is not entirely clear. Given the available literature on measured radiation exposure to the interventionist, and the controversy regarding dose thresholds, it is our current recommendation that the interventional pain physician use shielded eyewear. As the breadth of interventional procedures continues to grow, so does the radiation risk to the interventional pain physician. In this paper, we attempt to outline the risk of cataract formation in the scope of practice of an interventional pain physician and describe techniques that may help reduce them.
authors.affiliation: UCLA Medical Center, 1245 16th Street, Suite 220, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.
authors.forename: David E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Fish
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Christopher
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ornelas
authors.forename: Sungchan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Song
authors.forename: Sanjog
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Pangarkar
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):9836-9
references.pmid: 12119422
references.citation: Pain Physician. 2003 Jul;6(3):295-300
references.pmid: 16880875
references.citation: Pain Physician. 2001 Oct;4(4):343-8
references.pmid: 16902680
references.citation: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 May-Jun;27(3):296-305
references.pmid: 12016604
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 1998 Jul;71(847):728-33
references.pmid: 9771383
references.citation: Ann ICRP. 1991;21(1-3):1-201
references.pmid: 2053748
references.citation: Radiat Res. 2007 Feb;167(2):233-43
references.pmid: 17390731
references.citation: Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332
references.pmid: 18082557
references.citation: Invest Radiol. 1987 Aug;22(8):688-92
references.pmid: 3667176
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1993 Apr;83(4):588-90
references.pmid: 8460743
references.citation: Radiology. 1976 Nov;121(2):357-9
references.pmid: 981613
references.citation: Radiat Res. 2009 Jul;172(1):1-9
references.pmid: 19580502
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 08;10:537
references.pmid: 20825640
references.citation: Pain Physician. 2002 Oct;5(4):385-93
references.pmid: 16886017
references.citation: Int J Radiat Biol. 2004 May;80(5):339-45
references.pmid: 15223766
references.citation: Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):945-53
references.pmid: 18632529
references.citation: Pain Physician. 2004 Jan;7(1):81-92
references.pmid: 16868617
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Sep-Oct;12(5):1003-7
references.pmid: 1719788
references.citation: Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2001;94(1-2):95-8
references.pmid: 11487852
references.citation: Pain Physician. 2005 Jan;8(1):49-53
references.pmid: 16850042
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 May;83(5):697-701
references.pmid: 11994810
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jan;186(1):7-11
references.pmid: 16357370