title: Adolescents' Sexual Initiation: The Interaction of Race/Ethnicity and Immigrant Status.
abstract: This paper provides an in-depth examination of the joint effects of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on adolescents' intercourse risk. We employ a sample of 4,535 females and 3,759 males from the National Education Longitudinal Study (NELS 88/94) who were followed for 6 years beginning in the eighth grade. We use discrete-time logistic regression models to estimate the associations of race/ethnicity and immigrant generational status with first intercourse hazard, and to evaluate the statistical interactions between race/ethnicity and immigrant status. Overall, Asian and Hispanic girls had lower and non-Hispanic Black girls had higher estimated risks relative to non-Hispanic White girls. Hispanic boys and White non-Hispanic boys had similar intercourse risks, but Black boys had higher and Asian boys lower relative risks. However, these patterns are contingent on immigrant status. Among girls, the protective effects of Asian or Hispanic identity are found only among second generation youth. Risk profiles for boys are more complex: being a third-plus generation Hispanic is associated with a higher risk while an Asian identity is associated with a lower risk only among first- and second-generation youth. These findings confirm the importance of accounting for the overlap between race/ethnicity and immigrant status in models of adolescent behavior. As the demographic diversity of the US population grows, researchers must include both race/ethnicity and immigrant status in their models of adolescent behavior.
authors.affiliation: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 W. Franklin St., CB #8120, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-2524, USA.
authors.forename: Naomi J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Spence
authors.forename: Karin L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Brewster
references.citation: Curr Popul Rep Popul Charact. 1986 Sep;(408):1-97
references.pmid: 12158800
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1638-41
references.pmid: 1746662
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 1998 Oct;23(4):221-31
references.pmid: 9763158
references.citation: J Immigr Minor Health. 2007 Apr;9(2):85-94
references.pmid: 17111214
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 2008 Sep;43(3):231-8
references.pmid: 18710677
references.citation: Am Sociol Rev. 2009 Jun 1;74(3):445-464
references.pmid: 20161350
references.citation: Vital Health Stat 23. 2001 Apr;(21):1-79
references.pmid: 11478202
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2001 May;91(5):794-8
references.pmid: 11344890
references.citation: Demography. 2004 Nov;41(4):697-720
references.pmid: 15622950
references.citation: Soc Sci Res. 2008 Mar;37(1):109-137
references.pmid: 19255601
references.citation: Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Mar;38(1):28-36
references.pmid: 16554269
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 1995 Aug;17(2):99-105
references.pmid: 7495832
references.citation: Demography. 2007 May;44(2):373-88
references.pmid: 17583310
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2005 Jan;24(1):88-95
references.pmid: 15631566
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 2000 Nov;27(5):322-30
references.pmid: 11044704
references.citation: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2007 Feb;20(1):29-34
references.pmid: 17289514
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 2008 Jan;42(1):73-80
references.pmid: 18155033
references.citation: Psychol Rep. 1996 Aug;79(1):95-104
references.pmid: 8873793
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 1989 Mar;30(1):56-76
references.pmid: 2723380
references.citation: Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Dec;41(4):202-9
references.pmid: 20444173
references.citation: Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 May-Jun;30(3):121-7
references.pmid: 9635260
references.citation: Fam Plann Perspect. 1972 Oct;4(4):9-18
references.pmid: 4680255
references.citation: J Adolesc. 2000 Oct;23(5):615-27
references.pmid: 11073702