title: Threat and defense as goal regulation: from implicit goal conflict to anxious uncertainty, reactive approach motivation, and ideological extremism.
abstract: Four studies investigated a goal regulation view of anxious uncertainty threat (Gray & McNaughton, 2000) and ideological defense. Participants (N = 444) were randomly assigned to have achievement or relationship goals implicitly primed. The implicit goal primes were followed by randomly assigned achievement or relationship threats that have reliably caused generalized, reactive approach motivation and ideological defense in past research. The threats caused anxious uncertainty (Study 1), reactive approach motivation (Studies 2 and 3), and reactive ideological conviction (Study 4) only when threat-relevant goals had first been primed, but not when threat-irrelevant goals had first been primed. Reactive ideological conviction (Study 4) was eliminated if participants were given an opportunity to attribute their anxiety to a mundane source. Results support a goal regulation view of anxious uncertainty, threat, and defense with potential for integrating theories of defensive compensation.
authors: Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. nashka@yorku.ca
authors: Kyle
authors: K
authors: Nash
authors: Ian
authors: I
authors: McGregor
authors: Mike
authors: M
authors: Prentice
mesh_terms: D000124:Achievement; D000328:Adult; D001007:Anxiety / Q000523:psychology*; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003463:Cues; D003674:Defense Mechanisms; D005260:Female; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D035501:Uncertainty; D055815:Young Adult