title: Comparison of antidepressant effects between brief and ultrabrief pulse unilateral electroconvulsive therapy: brief report of a randomized double-blind trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatments with briefer pulse widths have recently shown promise.
  
  
  METHODS
  Consenting patients with major depression were randomized in a double-blind protocol into 1-millisecond brief pulse (n = 10) or 0.3-millisecond ultrabrief pulse (n = 12) right unilateral at thrice-weekly, 6 times the threshold dose treatments at identical charge rates.
  
  
  RESULTS
  After 8 treatments, the change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale was mean = 22.1 (SE, 4.8) for brief pulse and mean = 24.9 (SE, 4.2) for ultrabrief pulse ECT. The mean difference was 2.8 (95% confidence interval = -10.5 to 16.1; P = 0.7).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although inconclusive because of small sample size (type II error), ultrashort pulse widths appear to be as effective as standard pulse ECT.
authors: Prashanth
authors: P
authors: Mayur
authors: Anthony
authors: A
authors: Harris
mesh_terms: D003865:Major Depressive Disorder / Q000628:therapy*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004565:Electroconvulsive Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome