title: Do family physicians retrieve synopses of clinical research previously read as email alerts?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A synopsis of new clinical research highlights important aspects of one study in a brief structured format. When delivered as email alerts, synopses enable clinicians to become aware of new developments relevant for practice. Once read, a synopsis can become a known item of clinical information. In time-pressured situations, remembering a known item may facilitate information retrieval by the clinician. However, exactly how synopses first delivered as email alerts influence retrieval at some later time is not known.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  We examined searches for clinical information in which a synopsis previously read as an email alert was retrieved (defined as a dyad). Our study objectives were to (1) examine whether family physicians retrieved synopses they previously read as email alerts and then to (2) explore whether family physicians purposefully retrieved these synopses.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a mixed-methods study in which a qualitative multiple case study explored the retrieval of email alerts within a prospective longitudinal cohort of practicing family physicians. Reading of research-based synopses was tracked in two contexts: (1) push, meaning to read on email and (2) pull, meaning to read after retrieval from one electronic knowledge resource. Dyads, defined as synopses first read as email alerts and subsequently retrieved in a search of a knowledge resource, were prospectively identified. Participants were interviewed about all of their dyads. Outcomes were the total number of dyads and their type.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Over a period of 341 days, 194 unique synopses delivered to 41 participants resulted in 4937 synopsis readings. In all, 1205 synopses were retrieved over an average of 320 days. Of the 1205 retrieved synopses, 21 (1.7%) were dyads made by 17 family physicians. Of the 1205 retrieved synopses, 6 (0.5%) were known item type dyads. However, dyads also occurred serendipitously.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In the single knowledge resource we studied, email alerts containing research-based synopses were rarely retrieved. Our findings help us to better understand the effect of push on pull and to improve the integration of research-based information within electronic resources for clinicians.
authors: Information Technology Primary Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. roland.grad@mcgill.ca
authors: Roland
authors: R
authors: Grad
authors: Pierre
authors: P
authors: Pluye
authors: Janique
authors: J
authors: Johnson-Lafleur
authors: Vera
authors: V
authors: Granikov
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Shulha
authors: Gillian
authors: G
authors: Bartlett
authors: Bernard
authors: B
authors: Marlow
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003625:Data Collection; D034742:Electronic Mail; D006801:Humans; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D010821:Physicians, Family; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires