title: [A report of an accident investigation commission as evidence in legal proceedings].
abstract: In practice it happens that both a report of an accident investigation commission and court expert's opinions are under consideration during a civil or criminal case. The authors present three groups of problems that are associated with such situations, attempting to provide answers to the problems. The above-mentioned problems may be presented in the following way: may the body of evidence (inside the range of a court case) incorporate expert opinions, which were prepared for an accident investigation commission (if so--may such opinions replace evidence derived from a court expert's opinion); is it legally admissible to use findings of an accident investigation commission as evidential purpose in crime proceedings (if so--what kind of evidence should such findings represent); how should lawyers decide in case of a contradiction between an expert opinion of an accident investigation commission and a court expert's opinion.
authors: Z Katedry Kryminalistyki Uniwersytetu Slaskiego w Katowicach Katowice.
authors: Tadeusz
authors: T
authors: Widła
authors: Marek
authors: M
authors: Leśniak
mesh_terms: D000062:Accidents, Occupational / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D005554:Forensic Medicine / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D016365:Liability, Legal; D011044:Poland; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D024382:Professional Role