title: Privacy revisited? Old ideals, new realities, and their impact on biobank regimes.
abstract: Biobanks, collecting human specimen, medical records, and lifestyle-related data, face the challenge of having contradictory missions: on the one hand serving the collective welfare through easy access for medical research, on the other hand adhering to restrictive privacy expectations of people in order to maintain their willingness to participate in such research. In this article, ethical frameworks stressing the societal value of low-privacy expectations in order to secure biomedical research are discussed. It will turn out that neither utilitarian nor communitarian or classical libertarian ethics frameworks will help to serve both goals. Instead, John Rawls' differentiation of the "right" and the "good" is presented in order to illustrate the possibility of "serving two masters": individual interests of privacy, and societal interests of scientific progress and intergenerational justice. In order to illustrate this counterbalancing concept with an example, the five-pillar concept of the German Ethics Council will be briefly discussed.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Philosophy and Department of Theology, Systematic Theology II (Ethics), PRIVATE Gen Project, Friedrich Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Kochstraße 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
authors.forename: Arndt
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bialobrzeski
authors.forename: Jens
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ried
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Dabrock