title: A randomized controlled trail comparing the efficacy of 0.5% centbucridine to 2% lignocaine as local anesthetics in dental extractions.
abstract: The development of local anesthesia in dentistry has marked the beginning of a new era in terms of pain control. Lignocaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic (LA) agent even though it has a vasodilative effect and needs to be combined with adrenaline. Centbucridine is a non-ester, non amide group LA and has not been comprehensively studied in the dental setting and the objective was to compare it to Lignocaine. This was a randomized study comparing the onset time, duration, depth and cardiovascular parameters between Centbucridine (0.5%) and Lignocaine (2%). The study was conducted in the dental outpatient department at the Government Dental College in India on patients attending for the extraction of lower molars. A total of 198 patients were included and there were no significant differences between the LAs except those who received Centbucridine reported a significantly longer duration of anesthesia compared to those who received Lignocaine. None of the patients reported any side effects. Centbucridine was well tolerated and its substantial duration of anesthesia could be attributed to its chemical compound. Centbucridine can be used for dental procedures and can confidently be used in patients who cannot tolerate Lignocaine or where adrenaline is contraindicated.
authors.affiliation: Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Hizaam Street, P.O. Box 1263, Madinah Munawarah, Saudi Arabia.
authors.forename: Samir
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Mansuri
authors.forename: Ahmed
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bhayat
authors.forename: Esam
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Omar
authors.forename: Fadi
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Jarab
authors.forename: Mohammad Sami
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Ahmed