title: Is there a role for assisted reproductive technology in recurrent miscarriage?
abstract: Unexplained recurrent miscarriage (RM) is a significant health problem for which no effective treatment is available yet. In only 50% of couples with RM a cause can be found. In clinical practice, a frequently asked question is whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) is a treatment option. The scientific rationale and the chances of success for ART in couples with unexplained RM are still controversial. Presently, there is not enough evidence to justify IVF or intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a treatment option. Research on oocyte donation has been reported in one article. It is questionable whether couples with unexplained RM would undergo the potential risks and emotional aspects of ART. There is insufficient data on whether preimplantation genetic diagnosis improves the live birthrate in carriers of a structural chromosome rearrangement with a history of RM. No randomized controlled trials are available for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for unexplained RM. A recently published review concluded that the live birthrate for IVF/PGS and natural conception groups appears to be quite similar. Because evidence is lacking, we recommend refraining from ART in couples with recurrent miscarriage.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center (Q3-119), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Rosa
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Vissenberg
authors.forename: Mariëtte
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Goddijn
mesh_terms: D000026:Abortion, Habitual / Q000235:genetics / Q000276:immunology / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro; D005820:Genetic Testing; D006801:Humans; D007317:Insemination, Artificial, Homologous; D018587:Oocyte Donation; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D019836:Preimplantation Diagnosis; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted