title: Patients' adherence to hard acrylic interocclusal appliance treatment in general dental practice in Sweden.
abstract: The aims of the present study were to investigate patient adherence to treatment with hard acrylic interocclusal appliance in general dentistry in Sweden and to see if some general factors could predict patient adherence or non-adherence. During the period January - May 2009 a postal questionnaire was sent to all adult patients (> or = 20 years of age) that had received a hard acrylic interocclusal appliance from the public dental health service in the County of Uppsala during 2007 (n=388). The same questionnaire was also sent to all adult patients that had received a hard acrylic interocclusal appliance at a specialist clinic during the same year (n=69). The response rate in general dental practice was 71% and at the specialist clinic the response rate was 91%. In general dental practice, 97% of the hard acrylic interocclusal appliances were stabilisation appliances. At the specialist clinic other types of interocclusal appliances was used to a greater extent. A vast majority of patients in both general dental practice and at the specialist clinic experienced that the interocclusal appliance had a positive treatment effect. In general dental practice, 73% of the patients still used their interocclusal appliances 1 1/2-2 years after they had received them. The corresponding figure at the specialist clinic was 54%. The main reasons for not using the interocclusal appliance, besides disappearance/reduction of TMD symptoms, were different kinds of comfort problems. From the results of this study it is concluded that the patient adherence to hard acrylic stabilisation appliances made in general dental practice in Sweden is good. It can also be concluded that a perceived good treatment effect, as well as treatment of more long-term conditions, predicted a better patient adherence to hard acrylic stabilisation appliances. More studies concerning factors affecting patient adherence in TMD therapy are warranted.
authors.affiliation: Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Public Dental Health Services, Uppsala, Sweden. erik.lindfors@lul.se
authors.forename: Erik
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Lindfors
authors.forename: Martti
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Helkimo
authors.forename: Tomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Magnusson
mesh_terms: D000180:Acrylic Resins; D000328:Adult; D002012:Bruxism / Q000628:therapy; D005792:General Practice, Dental; D006801:Humans; D017090:Occlusal Splints / Q000009:adverse effects; D016382:Orthodontic Appliance Design; D010349:Patient Compliance; D013039:Specialties, Dental; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013705:Temporomandibular Joint Disorders / Q000628:therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000180:Acrylic Resins