title: Alternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluation.
abstract: In this paper we review several novel approaches for research evaluation. We start with a brief overview of the peer review, its controversies, and metrics for assessing efficiency and overall quality of the peer review. We then discuss five approaches, including reputation-based ones, that come out of the research carried out by the LiquidPub project and research groups collaborated with LiquidPub. Those approaches are alternative or complementary to traditional peer review. We discuss pros and cons of the proposed approaches and conclude with a vision for the future of the research evaluation, arguing that no single system can suit all stakeholders in various communities.
authors.affiliation: Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento Trento, Italy.
authors.forename: Aliaksandr
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Birukou
authors.forename: Joseph Rushton
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Wakeling
authors.forename: Claudio
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bartolini
authors.forename: Fabio
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Casati
authors.forename: Maurizio
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Marchese
authors.forename: Katsiaryna
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Mirylenka
authors.forename: Nardine
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Osman
authors.forename: Azzurra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ragone
authors.forename: Carles
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sierra
authors.forename: Aalam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Wassef