title: Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry is a promising indicator in assessing risk of having or developing breast cancer. This study aims to assess the performance improvement of a computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme in detecting masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetrical information.
  
  
  METHODS
  A testing dataset containing 2400 full-field digital mammograms (FFDM) acquired from 600 examination cases was established. Among them, 300 were positive cases with verified cancer associated with malignant masses and 300 were negative cases. Two computerized schemes were applied to process images of each case. The first single-image based CAD scheme detected suspicious mass regions and the second scheme computed average and difference of mammographic tissue density depicted between the left and right breast. A fusion method based on rotation of the CAD scoring projection reference axis was then applied to combine CAD-generated mass detection scores and either the computed average or difference (asymmetry) of bilateral mammographic density scores. The CAD performance levels with and without incorporating mammographic density information were evaluated and compared using a free-response receiver operating characteristic type data analysis method.
  
  
  RESULTS
  CAD achieved a case-based mass detection sensitivity of 0.74 and a region-based sensitivity of 0.56 at a false-positive rate of 0.25 per image. By fusing the CAD and bilateral mammographic density asymmetry scores, the case-based and region-based sensitivity levels of the CAD scheme were increased to 0.84 and 0.69, respectively, at the same false-positive rate. Fusion with average mammographic density only slightly increased CAD sensitivity to 0.75 (case-based) and 0.57 (region-based).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study indicated that 1) bilateral mammographic density asymmetry was a stronger indicator of the case depicting suspicious masses than the average density computed from two breasts and 2) fusion between the conventional CAD scores and bilateral mammographic density asymmetry information could substantially increase CAD performance in mass detection.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
authors.forename: Xingwei
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Lihua
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Weidong
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Xu
authors.forename: Wei
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: Dror
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Lederman
authors.forename: Bin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Zheng
mesh_terms: D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon / Q000379:methods*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000465:Algorithms; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013382:Subtraction Technique