title: Culling-induced changes in badger (Meles meles) behaviour, social organisation and the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis.
abstract: In the UK, attempts since the 1970s to control the incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle by culling a wildlife host, the European badger (Meles meles), have produced equivocal results. Culling-induced social perturbation of badger populations may lead to unexpected outcomes. We test predictions from the 'perturbation hypothesis', determining the impact of culling operations on badger populations, movement of surviving individuals and the influence on the epidemiology of bTB in badgers using data dervied from two study areas within the UK Government's Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT). Culling operations did not remove all individuals from setts, with between 34-43% of badgers removed from targeted social groups. After culling, bTB prevalence increased in badger social groups neighbouring removals, particularly amongst cubs. Seventy individual adult badgers were fitted with radio-collars, yielding 8,311 locational fixes from both sites between November 2001 and December 2003. Home range areas of animals surviving within removed groups increased by 43.5% in response to culling. Overlap between summer ranges of individuals from Neighbouring social groups in the treatment population increased by 73.3% in response to culling. The movement rate of individuals between social groups was low, but increased after culling, in Removed and Neighbouring social groups. Increased bTB prevalence in Neighbouring groups was associated with badger movements both into and out of these groups, although none of the moving individuals themselves tested positive for bTB. Significant increases in both the frequency of individual badger movements between groups and the emergence of bTB were observed in response to culling. However, no direct evidence was found to link the two phenomena. We hypothesise that the social disruption caused by culling may not only increase direct contact and thus disease transmission between surviving badgers, but may also increase social stress within the surviving population, causing immunosuppression and enhancing the expression of disease.
authors.affiliation: Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. philip.riordan@zoo.ox.ac.uk
authors.forename: Philip
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Riordan
authors.forename: Richard John
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Delahay
authors.forename: Chris
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cheeseman
authors.forename: Paul James
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Johnson
authors.forename: David Whyte
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Macdonald
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D002417:Cattle; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D045969:Mustelidae / Q000502:physiology*; D015995:Prevalence; D012919:Social Behavior; D014380:Tuberculosis, Bovine / Q000453:epidemiology*; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000453:epidemiology