title: Incidence and predictors of short- and long-term complications in pacemaker therapy: the FOLLOWPACE study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Today quantitative information about the type of complications and their incidence during long-term pacemaker (PM) follow-up is scarce.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the incidence and determinants of short- and long-term complications after first pacemaker implantation for bradycardia.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective multicenter cohort study (the FOLLOWPACE study) was conducted among 1517 patients receiving a PM between January 2003 and November 2007. The independent association of patient and implantation-procedure characteristics with the incidence of PM complications was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 1517 patients in 23 Dutch PM centers were followed for a mean of 5.8 years (SD 1.1), resulting in 8797 patient-years. Within 2 months, 188 (12.4%) patients developed PM complications. Male gender, age at implantation, body mass index, a history of cerebrovascular accident, congestive heart failure, use of anticoagulant drugs, and passive atrial lead fixation were independent predictors for complications within 2 months, yielding a C-index of 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.66). Annual hospital implanting volume did not additionally contribute to the prediction of short-term complications. Thereafter, 140 (9.2%) patients experienced complications, mostly lead-related complications (n = 84). Independent predictors for long-term complications were age, body mass index, hypertension, and a dual-chamber device, yielding a C-index of 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.67). The occurrence of a short-term PM complication was not predictive of future PM complications.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Complication incidence in modern pacing therapy is still substantial. Most complications occur early after PM implantation. Although various patient- and procedure-related characteristics are independent predictors for early and late complications, their ability to identify the patient at high risk is rather poor. This relatively high incidence of PM complications and their poor prediction underscores the usefulness of current guidelines for regular follow-up of patients with PM.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.o.udo@umcutrecht.nl
authors.forename: Erik O
authors.initials: EO
authors.lastname: Udo
authors.forename: Nicolaas P A
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Zuithoff
authors.forename: Norbert M
authors.initials: NM
authors.lastname: van Hemel
authors.forename: Carel C
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: de Cock
authors.forename: Thijs
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hendriks
authors.forename: Pieter A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Doevendans
authors.forename: Karel G M
authors.initials: KG
authors.lastname: Moons
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008297:Male; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial / Q000009:adverse effects*; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors