Ultrastructural analysis in preclinical safety evaluation.
The first electron microscopic images of biological specimens were made in the 1940s, and the next 30 years comprised an era of descriptive ultrastructure during which transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was integral to an explosion in cellular and molecular biology. However, when questions could no longer be answered by ultrastructural information alone, the use of TEM in biological research declined. Innovative molecular techniques and newer imaging technologies such as confocal fluorescence microscopy filled the gap, providing faster answers with less rigorous training as a prerequisite to data collection. The use of TEM in toxicologic pathology has paralleled the rise and fall of its popularity in other disciplines. However, TEM remains an essential resource that provides direct and unequivocal data to explain and address safety concerns in preclinical toxicity studies. There is still an important place for TEM in preclinical safety evaluation and mechanistic studies, particularly when visualization of subcellular structures provides a link to other endpoints. This review reinforces the value of TEM in preclinical safety testing and model development and encourages best practices for ultrastructural evaluation.
Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA. jane.fagerland@abbott.com
Jane A
JA
Fagerland
Henry G
HG
Wall
Karamjeet
K
Pandher
Bruce E
BE
LeRoy
Gerard D
GD
Gagne
D000818:Animals; D004353:Drug Evaluation, Preclinical / Q000379:methods*; D046529:Microscopy, Electron, Transmission / Q000379:methods*; D014116:Toxicology / Q000379:methods*