Aperture superposition dose model versus pencil beam superposition dose model for a finite size Cobalt-60 source for tomotherapy deliveries.
OBJECTIVE
The finite size pencil beam (FSPB) superposition method is a commonly used dose calculation method in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The FSPB model assumes that dose for a broad intensity modulated beam can be calculated by superposition of dose from small, pencil-like beams. However, this model is limited to point-like radiation sources and is not valid for finite size sources, such as a Cobalt-60 (Co-60) source of 2 cm diameter. In this paper, the authors present results that show the limitation of this model and propose an alternative model, namely the aperture superposition (AS) model, to calculate photon dose for intensity modulated beams arising from finite size radiation sources.


METHODS
The AS model is based on adding beam apertures rather than pencil beams. Each aperture is defined as a series of adjacently opened leaves of a multileaf collimator with no closed leaves in between them. The apertures are calculated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo program. The accuracy of the AS model was tested for dose calculations of fan beams, as encountered in tomotherapy treatment plans. The results were compared with the FSPB model and GafChromic film measurements. The measurements and simulations were performed for a clinical Theratronics T780C Co-60 unit with MIMiC binary multileaf collimator mounted on it.


RESULTS
The comparisons between the AS model and film measurements show agreement better than 1.5% in the high dose regions and 3.7% in the low dose regions. On the contrary, film measurement comparisons to the FSPB model show that the FSPB model underestimates the dose by up to 7% for small field sizes such as 2 × 2 cm(2) and 20% for larger field sizes such as 20 × 2 cm(2).


CONCLUSIONS
The results presented in this paper indicate that the AS model provides better accuracy than the FSPB model when calculating dose for fan beams from large radiation sources. The implementation of this model to the current treatment planning systems has the scope of advancing Co-60 based IMRT and tomotherapy.
Departments of Physics and Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
Sandeep
S
Dhanesar
Johnson
J
Darko
L John
LJ
Schreiner
D003037:Cobalt Radioisotopes / Q000032:analysis / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004867:Equipment Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011867:Radioisotope Teletherapy / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012542:Scattering, Radiation; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
D003037:Cobalt Radioisotopes