The costs of changing an intended action: movement planning, but not execution, interferes with verbal working memory.
How much cognitive effort does it take to change a movement plan? In previous studies, it has been shown that humans plan and represent actions in advance, but it remains unclear whether or not action planning and verbal working memory share cognitive resources. Using a novel experimental paradigm, we combined in two experiments a grasp-to-place task with a verbal working memory task. Participants planned a placing movement toward one of two target positions and subsequently encoded and maintained visually presented letters. Both experiments revealed that re-planning the intended action reduced letter recall performance; execution time, however, was not influenced by action modifications. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that the action's interference with verbal working memory arose during the planning rather than the execution phase of the movement. Together, our results strongly suggest that movement planning and verbal working memory share common cognitive resources.
Neurocognition and Action - Biomechanics Research Group, Bielefeld University, Germany; Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC), Bielefeld University, Germany. marnie ann.spiegel@uni-bielefeld.de
M A
MA
Spiegel
D
D
Koester
M
M
Weigelt
T
T
Schack
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D056344:Executive Function / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009068:Movement; D013850:Thinking / Q000502:physiology*; D014705:Verbal Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult