Population, professional, and client support for different models of managing addictive behaviors.
This study, funded by the Academy of Finland, explores how different stakeholder groups in Finland attribute responsibility for various addictions. A random general population survey and surveys with addiction treatment professionals and clients (n = 1,338) were conducted in 2007-2008. The data were analyzed with analyses of variance and logistic regression analysis. Individual responsibility was emphasized by all groups. The Moral model dominated in behavioral and the Enlightenment model in hard drug addictions, views on other substance addictions varied more. Some signs of the actor-observer asymmetry were observed. Personal addiction experiences and sex were the major predictors of the average response tendencies. The heavy emphasis on individual responsibility may prevent help-seeking.
University of Tampere, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Tampere, Finland. anja.koski-jannes@uta.fi
Anja
A
Koski-Jännes
Tanja
T
Hirschovits-Gerz
Marjo
M
Pennonen
D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D016739:Behavior, Addictive / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D005387:Finland; D005715:Gambling / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009014:Morals; D057545:Social Stigma; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014029:Tobacco Use Disorder / Q000523:psychology