Holding power of three different pin designs in the femur and ulna of the common buzzard (Buteo buteo).
External skeletal fixation is generally considered the best stabilization technique for immobilizing avian long bone fractures, but one of its major complications is the failure of bone-fixation pin interface or the loss of holding power. Consequently, this study is aimed at elucidating which pin design offers more pull-out strength in certain bones of the common buzzard (Buteo buteo). To achieve this objective, three pin designs (a smooth design and two negative profile threaded designs, with different thread pitch) were placed in five positions along the femur and ulna of the common buzzard. The pin pull-out strength was measured with the purpose of comparing medullary and pneumatic bones, insertion sites, and pin designs. Threaded pins with negative profile showed greater holding power than smooth pins (P < 0.05). When comparing holding power between the ulna and femur, no differences were found for smooth pins, whereas threaded pins showed more pull-out strength in the ulna than in the femur (P < 0.05). There were no differences observed related to pin location along the same bone when considering the same pin type. These results suggest that negative profile threaded pins have more holding power than smooth pins and that pneumatic bones provide less pull-out strength to negative profile threaded pins than medullary bones.
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Santiago de Compostela, Av. Carvallo Calero, s/n, ZC 27002, Lugo, Spain. mariano.lopez@usc.es
Mariano
M
López García
Ana M
AM
López Beceiro
Víctor
V
Valcárcel Juárez
Fernando
F
Muñoz Guzón
Antonio
A
González Cantalapiedra
D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001858:Bone Nails / Q000662:veterinary*; D002102:Cadaver; D046093:Falconiformes; D005269:Femur / Q000502:physiology*; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000662:veterinary*; D014457:Ulna / Q000502:physiology*