Do century-specific equations provide better estimates of stature? A test of the 19-20th century boundary for the stature estimation feature in Fordisc 3.0.
A sample (n=28) from the Terry Collection was selected to include only White males who were born and had their entire growth and development period before 1900 to assess the effects year of birth have on accuracy and precision when estimating stature. Using the computer application Fordisc 3.0, stature was estimated using the humerus, radius, femur, and tibia equations developed from White males born in the 19th Century and the 20th Century. The 19th Century White male equations did not consistently provide the most precise and accurate estimates of stature. The 20th Century equations provide results that were as good as or slightly better than the 19th Century equations for the humerus, radius and femur. The 20th Century equations provided notably better results for the tibia. There is a great deal of evidence that there are clear positive secular changes in most of North America in the last 100-125 years, but the division commonly advocated in a forensic context at the year 1900 has no positive effect on accuracy or precision when estimating stature.
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada. albanese@uwindsor.ca
John
J
Albanese
Stephanie E
SE
Osley
Andrew
A
Tuck
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001827:Body Height; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D018732:Forensic Anthropology; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D055641:Mathematical Concepts; D012984:Software; D044465:White People