Primary care as a permanent setting for research.
OBJECTIVE
The critical importance of a closer and structural involvement of primary care in research has been increasingly recognized over the last several years, and has been the object of extensive conceptual and institutional debates and proposals. There is, however, still a gap between the consistency of the recommendations and their translation into practice.


METHODS
Based on the most recent literature on the integration of the paradigm of efficacy (evidence-based medicine) with the one on outcomes-effectiveness, as well as on the experience gained with large collaborative studies performed by Italian general practitioners (GPs), the paper discusses the reasons for giving priority to what could be done to bridge the gap and the conditions of feasibility.


CONCLUSIONS
Specifically, the results obtained most recently in a large-scale, epidemiological and experimental project with a prospective cohort of ∼12,500 subjects included by 860 GPs across the country in the field of cardiovascular risk prevention (the Rischio e Prevenzione Study) provide the concrete framework for an agenda of action proposed as a way forward, which appears to be highly critical for visibility and cultural autonomy of GPs also at the European level.
Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Chieti, Italy. tognoni@negrisud.it
Gianni
G
Tognoni
Vittorio
V
Caimi
Massimo
M
Tombesi
Giorgio
G
Visentin
D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*