title: Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of life research, doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6.
abstract: This article is a brief commentary in response to "Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of life research, doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6 ." The commentary argues that approximate goodness-of-fit indexes cannot be used to salvage confirmatory factor models rejected by the Chi-square test of exact fit. Instead, rigorous diagnostic procedures should be used to identify and resolve the particular sources of model misspecification.
authors.affiliation: National Crime Prevention Centre, Public Safety Canada, 269 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0P8, Canada. cameron.mcintosh@ps-sp.gc.ca
authors.forename: Cameron N
authors.initials: CN
authors.lastname: McIntosh
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis*; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods*; D011788:Quality of Life / Q000523:psychology*