title: [Discussing the resuscitation policy at a geriatric ward: the experience of patients or their representatives].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To identify geriatric patients' and their surrogate decision makers' experience with regard to discussing cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) policy.
  
  
  METHODS
  This is a prospective, observational, explorative survey. During 10 weeks, all patients admitted to a geriatric ward of a general Dutch hospital or their representatives were asked for their experience regarding discussion of the resuscitation policy with the physician in attendance. Discussing this policy is a standard procedure at the first day of admission. We also asked on several factors which could influence their experience and on factors to improve discussing resuscitation policies. The primary outcome was the participant's satisfaction expressed on a scale of 1 to l0 regarding satisfaction with the CPR discussion.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Seventy-six participants were included, of which 29 patients and 47 surrogate decision makers. Discussing the resuscitation policy took an average of 4,5 minutes (SD 3.2) to complete. In 70% (n=53) of cases a do-not-resuscitate decision was made. Discussing the resuscitation policy was experienced positive, with an average rate of 7,8 (SD 1.5). A total of 121 positive comments were made, as opposed to 70 negative comments. When they talked about their resuscitation policy, most patients expressed positive emotional responses. As most important improvements were mentioned: a better introduction to discussing this subject (17%), a better explanation of resuscitation and chances of survival (17%) and providing information prior to admission to the ward, so that patient and surrogate decision maker have been informed that the resuscitation policy will be discussed (12%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most patients and relatives in this study wished to discuss their resuscitation policy with physicians. Still, there is room for improvement in several respects. Patients and surrogate decision makers are in favour of discussing the standard resuscitation policy with the doctor, and evaluate this conversation with a 7.8 / 10. In order to improve both discussing the CPR policy preparing the patient and his representatives and communicating more extensively during the interview are recommended.
authors.affiliation: Afdeling Geriatrie Jeroen Bosh Ziekenhui's-Hertogenbosh. bressersjanneke@hotmail.com
authors.forename: J P A
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Bressers
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Algra
authors.forename: P L J
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Dautzenberg
authors.forename: J J M
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: van Delden
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Q000523:psychology*; D003142:Communication; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D005853:Geriatrics / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009426:Netherlands; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016414:Resuscitation Orders / Q000523:psychology*