title: Contact allergens for armpits--allergenic fragrances specified on deodorants.
abstract: According to the so-called "26 allergens rule" 26 supposedly allergenic fragrances must be specified on the containers of cosmetic products if they are present above 0.001% in leave-on products and, 0.01% in rinse-off products. This declaration is meant to inform the consumers of potential risks of skin sensitizers in the products. As many consumers of deodorants suffer from allergic or irritant contact dermatitis in the axillae, the presence of allergens in deodorants deserves special attention. The objective of this study was to find answers to the following questions: Does compulsory labeling lead to omission of strong allergenic fragrances in deodorants? Is there a difference in the use patterns of strong and weak allergens? What is the quantitative exposure to fragrances by deodorants? Is the situation in Germany different from other European countries? Is there a difference between deodorants for men and for women? I tested the implementation of the "26 allergens rule" and compiled which allergenic fragrances are specified on the containers of deodorants. Three market studies were conducted in Germany in 2008, 2010 and 2011. The labels of a total number of 374 deodorants were analyzed as to whether any of the "26 allergens" were listed. The frequency of each allergen in the deodorants was compared with results from previous studies by other authors. It was found that up to 83% of the deodorants contain at least one of the "26 allergens" and that up to 30% of all products contain strong allergens above the threshold for labeling (0.001% in the product). The most frequently listed allergens are medium or weak allergens. In comparison with other authors, the frequency of the "26 allergens" in products is slightly smaller in these recent studies for the German market. There is no significant difference between deodorants for men and women, as far as the labeling of the "26 allergens" is concerned. The results show that the mandatory labeling procedure as designed in the "26 allergen rule" is not suitable to guarantee consumer safety for deodorants. As long as consumers are not informed about allergens in products in an easy to understand and transparent way, a compulsory pictogram on the container should inform them about possible risks.
authors.affiliation: University of Applied Sciences Ulm, Prittwitzstr. 10, D-89075 Ulm, Germany. Klaschka@hs-ulm.de
authors.forename: Ursula
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Klaschka
mesh_terms: D000485:Allergens / Q000032:analysis*; D003836:Deodorants / Q000032:analysis*; D004348:Drug Labeling; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010476:Perfume / Q000032:analysis*
chemical_list: D000485:Allergens; D003836:Deodorants; D010476:Perfume