title: Comparing pluralities.
abstract: What does it mean to compare sets of objects along a scale, for example by saying "the men are taller than the women"? We explore comparison of pluralities in two experiments, eliciting comparison judgments while varying the properties of the members of each set. We find that a plurality is judged as "bigger" when the mean size of its members is larger than the mean size of the competing plurality. These results are incompatible with previous accounts, in which plural comparison is inferred from many instances of singular comparison between the members of the sets (Matushansky & Ruys, 2006). Our results suggest the need for a type of predication that ascribes properties to plural entities, not just individuals, based on aggregate statistics of their members. More generally, these results support the idea that sets and their properties are actively represented as single units.
authors.affiliation: Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, United States. scontras@fas.harvard.edu
authors.forename: Gregory
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Scontras
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Graff
authors.forename: Noah D
authors.initials: ND
authors.lastname: Goodman
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007802:Language; D007804:Language Development; D008960:Models, Psychological; D012660:Semantics; D012858:Size Perception / Q000502:physiology