title: Is cognitive science usefully cast as complexity science?
abstract: Readers of TopiCS are invited to join a debate about the utility of ideas and methods of complexity science. The topics of debate include empirical instances of qualitative change in cognitive activity and whether this empirical work demonstrates sufficiently the empirical flags of complexity. In addition, new phenomena discovered by complexity scientists, and motivated by complexity theory, call into question some basic assumptions of conventional cognitive science such as stable equilibria and homogeneous variance. The articles and commentaries that appear in this issue also illustrate a new debate style format for topiCS.
authors.affiliation: CAP Center for Cognition, Action & Perception, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221-0376, USA. guy.van.orden@uc.edu
authors.forename: Guy
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Van Orden
authors.forename: Damian G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Stephen
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D019336:Cognitive Science; D036262:Empirical Research; D006801:Humans; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics