title: Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in home care and supportive living.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although considerable evidence exists about the effectiveness of audit coupled with feedback, very few audit-with-feedback interventions have been done in either home care or supportive living settings to date. With little history of audit and feedback in home care or supportive living there is potential for greater effects, at least initially. This study extends the work of an earlier study designed to assess the effects of an audit-with-feedback intervention. It will be delivered quarterly over a one-year period in seven home care offices and 11 supportive living sites. The research questions are the same as in the first study but in a different environment. They are as follows: 1. What effects do feedback reports have on processes and outcomes over time? 2. How do different provider groups in home care and supportive living sites respond to feedback reports based on quality indicator data?
  
  
  METHODS
  The research team conducting this study includes researchers and decision makers in continuing care in the province of Alberta, Canada. The intervention consists of quarterly feedback reports in 19 home care offices and supportive living sites across Alberta. Data for the feedback reports are based on the Resident Assessment Instrument Home Care tool, a standardized instrument mandated for use in home care and supportive living environments throughout Alberta. The feedback reports consist of one page, printed front and back, presenting both graphic and textual information. Reports are delivered to all employees working in each site. The primary evaluation uses a controlled interrupted time-series design, both adjusted and unadjusted for covariates. The concurrent process evaluation includes observation, focus groups, and self-reports to assess uptake of the feedback reports. The project described in this protocol follows a similar intervention conducted in our previous study, Data for Improvement and Clinical Excellence--Long-Term Care. We will offer dissemination strategies and spread of the feedback report approach in several ways suited to various audiences and stakeholders throughout Alberta.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study will generate knowledge about the effects of an audit with feedback intervention in home care and supportive living settings. Our dissemination activities will focus on supporting sites to continue to use the Resident Assessment Instrument data in their quality improvement activities.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. kimberly.fraser@ualberta.ca
authors.forename: Kimberly D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: Fraser
authors.forename: Anne E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Sales
authors.forename: Hannah M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: O'Rourke
authors.forename: Corinne
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Schalm
mesh_terms: D000416:Alberta; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods; D005246:Feedback; D006699:Home Care Services / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008134:Long-Term Care / Q000592:standards*; D008485:Medical Audit; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care; D012944:Social Support