title: Long-term results of iliac aneurysm repair with iliac branched endograft: a 5-year experience on 100 consecutive cases.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Iliac branch device (IBD) technique has been introduced as an appealing and effective solution to avoid complications occurring during repair of aorto-iliac aneurysm with extensive iliac involvement. Nevertheless, no large series with long-term follow-up of IBD are available. The aim of this study was to analyse safety and long-term efficacy of IBD in a consecutive series of patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between 2006 and 2011, 100 consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective database on IBD. Indications included unilateral or bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms combined or not with abdominal aneurysms. Patients were routinely followed up with computed tomography. Data were reported according to the Kaplan-Meier method.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 96 males, mean age 74.1 years. Preoperative median common iliac aneurysm diameter was 40 mm (interquartile range (IQR): 35-44 mm). Sixty-seven patients had abdominal aortic aneurysm >35 mm (IQR: 40-57 mm) associated with iliac aneurysm. Eleven patients presented hypogastric aneurysm. Twelve patients underwent isolated iliac repair with IBD and 88 patients received associated endovascular aortic repair. Periprocedural technical success rate was 95%, with no mortality. Two patients experienced external iliac occlusion in the first month. At a median follow-up of 21 months (range 1-60) aneurysm growth >3 mm was detected in four iliac (4%) arteries. Iliac endoleak (one type III and two distal type I) developed in three patients and buttock claudication in four patients. Estimated patency rate of internal iliac branch was 91.4% at 1 and 5 years. Freedom from any reintervention rate was 90% at 1 year and 81.4% at 5 years. No late ruptures occurred.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Long-term results show that IBD use can ensure persistent iliac aneurysm exclusion at 5 years, with low risk of reintervention. This technique can be considered as a first endovascular option in patients with extensive iliac aneurysm disease and favourable anatomy.
authors.affiliation: Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, S. Andrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Parlani
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Verzini
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: De Rango
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Brambilla
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Coscarella
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ferrer
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Cao
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D017542:Aneurysm, Ruptured / Q000453:epidemiology; D001807:Blood Vessel Prosthesis; D019917:Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; D057867:Endoleak / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology; D057510:Endovascular Procedures; D004868:Equipment Failure / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D017543:Iliac Aneurysm / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D007083:Iliac Artery / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D015994:Incidence; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D012086:Reoperation; D015996:Survival Rate; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014463:Ultrasonography; D014654:Vascular Patency