title: The content of compound conditioning.
abstract: In three experiments using Pavlovian conditioning of magazine approach, rats were trained with a compound stimulus, AB, and were concurrently trained with stimulus B on its own. The reinforcement rate of B, rB, was either 1/2, 2/3, or 2/5 of rAB. After extended training, the conditioning strength of A was assessed using probe trials in which A was presented alone. Responding during A was compared with that during AB, B, and a third stimulus, C, for which rC = rAB - rB. In each experiment, the rats' response rate during A was almost identical to that during C (and during B, when rB = 1/2rAB). This suggests that, during AB conditioning, the rats had learned about rA as being equal to [rAB - rB], and implies that the content of their learning was a linear function of r. The findings provide strong support for rate-based models of conditioning (e.g., Gallistel & Gibbon, 2000). They are also consistent with the associative account of learning defined in the Rescorla and Wagner (1972) model, but only if the learning rate during reinforcement equals that during nonreinforcement.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. justin.harris@sydney.edu.au
authors.forename: Justin A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Harris
authors.forename: Benjamin J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Andrew
authors.forename: Evan J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Livesey
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D003214:Conditioning, Classical / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D013997:Time Factors