title: [Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: do we actually need a robot?].
abstract: Compared to radical prostatectomy robotic surgery is far from becoming the standard of care for radical cystectomy. Concerns about perioperative and oncological safety as well as patient's benefit from this procedure may be a reason.In current publications no differences of perioperative morbidity and mortality were observed between patients undergoing open or robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Interestingly, older patients or patients with impaired health status might even profit from this technique. Though long-term data are missing, oncological results of robot-assisted radical cystectomy are encouraging. Extended lymphadenectomy is possible and positive margins are not seen more frequently. Concerning functional results (continence, potency) only little information is evaluable.In summary, operative and oncological outcomes do not seem to be impaired by robot assistance in radical cystectomy. However, whether patients or patient subgroups truly benefit from robot-assisted cystectomy needs to be elucidated in the future.
authors.affiliation: Urologische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40625 Düsseldorf, Deutschland. Guenter.Niegisch@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Niegisch
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Albers
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Rabenalt
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015653:Cystectomy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008197:Lymph Node Excision / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000379:methods; D012307:Risk Factors; D012371:Robotics / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D001749:Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*