title: Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
abstract: The aim of this research was to evaluate how fingerprint analysts would incorporate information from newly developed tools into their decision making processes. Specifically, we assessed effects using the following: (1) a quality tool to aid in the assessment of the clarity of the friction ridge details, (2) a statistical tool to provide likelihood ratios representing the strength of the corresponding features between compared fingerprints, and (3) consensus information from a group of trained fingerprint experts. The measured variables for the effect on examiner performance were the accuracy and reproducibility of the conclusions against the ground truth (including the impact on error rates) and the analyst accuracy and variation for feature selection and comparison. The results showed that participants using the consensus information from other fingerprint experts demonstrated more consistency and accuracy in minutiae selection. They also demonstrated higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in the decisions reported. The quality tool also affected minutiae selection (which, in turn, had limited influence on the reported decisions); the statistical tool did not appear to influence the reported decisions.
authors.affiliation: Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA), Saint Paul, MN 55106, USA. glenn.langenburg@state.mn.us
authors.forename: Glenn
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Langenburg
authors.forename: Christophe
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Champod
authors.forename: Thibault
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Genessay
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D003878:Dermatoglyphics; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007600:Judgment; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D014584:User-Computer Interface