title: Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for rectal cancer staging. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of phased array MRI for T category (T1-2 vs. T3-4), lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in primary rectal cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched using combinations of keywords relating to rectal cancer and MRI. Reference lists of included articles were also searched by hand. Inclusion criteria were: (1) original article published January 2000-March 2011, (2) use of phased array coil MRI, (3) histopathology used as reference standard, and (4) raw data available to create 2×2 contingency tables. Patients who underwent preoperative long-course radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were excluded. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were estimated for each outcome using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics and bivariate random effects modeling.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-one studies were included in the analysis. There was notable heterogeneity among studies. MRI specificity was significantly higher for CRM involvement [94%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 88-97] than for T category (75%, 95% CI 68-80) and lymph nodes (71%, 95% CI 59-81). There was no significant difference in sensitivity between the three elements as a result of wide overlapping CIs. Diagnostic odds ratio was significantly higher for CRM (56.1, 95% CI 15.3-205.8) than for lymph nodes (8.3, 95% CI 4.6-14.7) but did not differ significantly from T category (20.4, 95% CI 11.1-37.3).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  MRI has good accuracy for both CRM and T category and should be considered for preoperative rectal cancer staging. In contrast, lymph node assessment is poor on MRI.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
authors.forename: Eisar
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Al-Sukhni
authors.forename: Laurent
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Milot
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Fruitman
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Beyene
authors.forename: J Charles
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Victor
authors.forename: Selina
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Schmocker
authors.forename: Gina
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Robin
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: McLeod
authors.forename: Erin
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Kennedy
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D011379:Prognosis; D012372:ROC Curve; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D012196:Review Literature as Topic