title: A fragment-based approach to the SAMPL3 Challenge.
abstract: The success of molecular fragment-based design depends critically on the ability to make predictions of binding poses and of affinity ranking for compounds assembled by linking fragments. The SAMPL3 Challenge provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the performance of a state-of-the-art fragment-based design methodology with respect to these requirements. In this article, we present results derived from linking fragments to predict affinity and pose in the SAMPL3 Challenge. The goal is to demonstrate how incorporating different aspects of modeling protein-ligand interactions impact the accuracy of the predictions, including protein dielectric models, charged versus neutral ligands, ΔΔGs solvation energies, and induced conformational stress. The core method is based on annealing of chemical potential in a Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GC/MC) simulation. By imposing an initially very high chemical potential and then automatically running a sequence of simulations at successively decreasing chemical potentials, the GC/MC simulation efficiently discovers statistical distributions of bound fragment locations and orientations not found reliably without the annealing. This method accounts for configurational entropy, the role of bound water molecules, and results in a prediction of all the locations on the protein that have any affinity for the fragment. Disregarding any of these factors in affinity-rank prediction leads to significantly worse correlation with experimentally-determined free energies of binding. We relate three important conclusions from this challenge as applied to GC/MC: (1) modeling neutral ligands--regardless of the charged state in the active site--produced better affinity ranking than using charged ligands, although, in both cases, the poses were almost exactly overlaid; (2) simulating explicit water molecules in the GC/MC gave better affinity and pose predictions; and (3) applying a ΔΔGs solvation correction further improved the ranking of the neutral ligands. Using the GC/MC method under a variety of parameters in the blinded SAMPL3 Challenge provided important insights to the relevant parameters and boundaries in predicting binding affinities using simulated annealing of chemical potential calculations.
authors.affiliation: BioLeap, Inc., 238 W. Delaware Avenue, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA. jlkiii@bioleap.com
authors.forename: John L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Kulp
authors.forename: Seth N
authors.initials: SN
authors.lastname: Blumenthal
authors.forename: Qiang
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Richard L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Bryan
authors.forename: Frank
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Guarnieri
mesh_terms: D003198:Computer Simulation; D019277:Entropy; D008024:Ligands; D008958:Models, Molecular; D008968:Molecular Conformation; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D011485:Protein Binding; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry*; D013816:Thermodynamics; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry
chemical_list: D008024:Ligands; D011506:Proteins; D014867:Water