title: Automated in-clinic hematology instruments for small animal practitioners: what is available, what can they really do, and how do i make a choice?
abstract: To have an in-clinic hematology instrument in your practice and how it is used are decisions that precede the purchase of an instrument. Advantages and limitations of the various instruments should be considered. Initial purchase cost, reagent/disposable costs, costs of training personnel in the use and care of the instrument, and service/repair contract costs need to be considered. Once the decision is made to have an in-office hematology instrument in your practice you should benefit from having nearly immediate CBC data results that enable you to provide better quality medicine, more rapid clinical decisions, more closely monitor patients for complications of disease or response to treatment. It should also generate revenue and allow some of your staff members to expand and develop their technical skills as they learn the nuances of a new diagnostic tool and how to provide you with the most accurate CBC information. In the final assessment, the addition of an in-office hematology instrument should improve the quality and efficiency of the medical care you provide patients and generate additional practice income.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, 171 Greene Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5519, USA. welleeg@auburn.edu
authors.forename: Elizabeth G
authors.initials: EG
authors.lastname: Welles
mesh_terms: D000820:Animal Diseases / Q000097:blood / Q000175:diagnosis; D000818:Animals; D001331:Automation; D003657:Decision Making; D005434:Flow Cytometry / Q000662:veterinary; D006403:Hematologic Tests / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards / Q000662:veterinary*; D006405:Hematology / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006762:Hospitals, Animal; D007753:Laboratories / Q000592:standards; D014730:Veterinary Medicine / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards