title: The next generation: the value of reminding.
abstract: In two experiments, we investigated the influence of repeated processing in the context of the generation effect. In both experiments, participants studied words once or twice. Once-studied words either were read or were generated from a definition. Twice-studied words were read both times, generated both times, or read once and generated once. Free recall was best (in order of decreasing performance) after generating twice, after generating plus reading, and finally after generating once; any generation was better than purely reading. Recognition showed a similar pattern, except that the benefit of generating twice was not as striking as in recall and that reading plus generating was just as effective as generating twice. The overall pattern of results is accounted for by a simple model in which a second encoding results in a reminding of the first encoding, and this additional encoding supports subsequent recollection. This reminding is, consequently, more effective in recall than in recognition, and it operates in accordance with the principles of transfer-appropriate processing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. cmacleod@uwaterloo.ca
authors.forename: Colin M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: MacLeod
authors.forename: Molly M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Pottruff
authors.forename: Noah D
authors.initials: ND
authors.lastname: Forrin
authors.forename: Michael E J
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Masson
mesh_terms: D001245:Association Learning; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011932:Reading; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D014705:Verbal Behavior; D014706:Verbal Learning