title: Comparative effectiveness research under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: can new bottles accommodate old wine?
abstract: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, initiated comprehensive health reform for the healthcare sector of the United States. PPACA includes strategies to make the American healthcare sector more efficient and effective. PPACA's comparative effectiveness research initiative and the establishment of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute are major strategies in this regard. PPACA's comparative effectiveness research initiative is one in a long line of federal initiatives to address the rising costs of healthcare as well as to obtain better value for healthcare expenditures. The key question is whether the governance and design features of the institute that will oversee the initiative will enable it to succeed where other federal efforts have faltered. This Article analyzes the federal government's quest to ensure value for money expended in publically funded healthcare programs and the health sector generally. This Article will also analyze what factors contribute to the possible success or failure of the comparative effectiveness research initiative. Success can be defined as the use of the findings of comparative effectiveness to make medical practice less costly, more efficient and effective, and ultimately, to bend the cost curve.
authors.affiliation: Hall Center for Law and Health, Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis, USA.
authors.forename: Eleanor D
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Kinney
mesh_terms: D057186:Comparative Effectiveness Research; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D058991:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; D014481:United States