title: Goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions in autism.
abstract: Goal attainment scaling (GAS) holds promise as an idiographic approach for measuring outcomes of psychosocial interventions in community settings. GAS has been criticized for untested assumptions of scaling level (i.e., interval or ordinal), inter-individual equivalence and comparability, and reliability of coding across different behavioral observation methods. We tested assumptions of equality between GAS descriptions for outcome measurement in a randomized trial (i.e., measurability, equidistance, level of difficulty, comparability of behavior samples collected from teachers vs. researchers and live vs. videotape). Results suggest GAS descriptions can be evaluated for equivalency, that teacher collected behavior samples are representative, and that varied sources of behavior samples can be reliably coded. GAS is a promising measurement approach. Recommendations are provided to ensure methodological quality.
authors.affiliation: Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Kentucky, 237 Dickey Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0017, USA. lisa.ruble@uky.edu
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Ruble
authors.forename: John H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: McGrew
authors.forename: Michael D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Toland
mesh_terms: D001321:Autistic Disorder / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D001521:Behavior Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design