Spurring enrollment in Medicare savings programs through a substitute for the asset test focused on investment income.
Fewer than one-third of eligible Medicare beneficiaries enroll in Medicare savings programs, which pay premiums and, in some cases, eliminate out-of-pocket cost sharing for poor and near-poor enrollees. Many beneficiaries don't participate in savings programs because they must complete a cumbersome application process, including a burdensome asset test. We demonstrate that a streamlined alternative to the asset test-allowing seniors to qualify for Medicare savings programs by providing evidence of limited assets or showing a lack of investment income-would permit 78 percent of currently eligible seniors to bypass the asset test entirely. This simplified approach would increase the number of beneficiaries who qualify for Medicare savings programs from the current 3.6 million seniors to 4.6 million. Such an alternative would keep benefits targeted to people with low assets, eliminate costly administrative expenses and obstacles to enrollment associated with the asset test, and avoid the much larger influx of seniors that would occur if the asset test were eliminated entirely.
Urban Institute's Health Policy Center, Washington, DC, USA. sdorn@urban.org
Stan
S
Dorn
Baoping
B
Shang
D017046:Cost Savings; D004608:Eligibility Determination; D005382:Financing, Personal; D006801:Humans; D006278:Medicare / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011203:Poverty; D014481:United States