Indicators of healthy work environments--a systematic review.
The purpose of this study was to systematically review the scientific literature and search for indicators of healthy work environments. A number of major national and international databases for scientific publication were searched for research addressing indicators of healthy work environments. Altogether 19,768 publications were found. After excluding duplicates, non-relevant publications, or publications that did not comply with the inclusion criteria 24 peer-reviewed publications remained to be included in this systematic review. Only one study explicitly addressing indicators of healthy work environments was found. That study suggested that the presence of stress management programs in an organization might serve as indicator of a 'good place to work', as these organizations were more likely to offer programs that encouraged employee well-being, safety and skill development than those without stress management programs. The other 23 studies either investigated employee's views of what constitute a healthy workplace or were guidelines for how to create such a workplace. Summarizing, the nine most pronounced factors considered as important for a healthy workplace that emerged from these studies were, in descending order: collaboration/teamwork: growth and development of the individual; recognition; employee involvement; positive, accessible and fair leader; autonomy and empowerment; appropriate staffing; skilled communication; and safe physical work.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden. per.lindberg@hig.se
Per
P
Lindberg
Eva
E
Vingård
D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006801:Humans; D007857:Leadership; D016272:Occupational Health; D011209:Power, Psychological; D017009:Professional Autonomy; D012056:Reinforcement, Social; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016526:Workload; D017132:Workplace