Variations in constrained retrieval.
Mentally reinstating encoding operations at retrieval might improve access to memories; however, such constrained retrieval is an effortful process that may not always be used. The memory-for-foils procedure (Jacoby, Shimizu, Daniels, & Rhodes, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 852-857, 2005) infers participant-initiated mental reinstatement of encoding operations during attempts at recognition from the differential memory that accrues to foils during a test of deeply processed items versus during a test of shallowly processed items, as indicated by performance on a final recognition memory test for the foils. Experiment 1 tested whether differential memory for foils is due to the evocation of task context during recollection of neighboring old items. Experiment 2 tested whether inducing a set to respond without much effort on a prior recognition test affects the likelihood of constrained retrieval on later tests. Experiment 3 tested whether constrained retrieval is less likely to occur when the deep versus shallow source of test items is intermixed, rather than blocked in separate tests. These experiments provide evidence that people query memory by mentally reinstating encoding operations and identify conditions that affect the probability of constrained retrieval.
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, 1107 W Call Street, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA. alban@psy.fsu.edu
Michael W
MW
Alban
Colleen M
CM
Kelley
D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D011334:Proactive Inhibition; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D014706:Verbal Learning