How to use programme theory to evaluate the effectiveness of schemes designed to improve the work environment in small businesses.
Due to the many constraints that small businesses (SBs) face in meeting legislative requirements, occupational health and safety (OHS) regulatory authorities and other OSH actors have developed programmes which can reach out to SBs and motivate and assist them in improving the work environment. A number of conceptual models help to enhance our understanding of OHS interventions in SBs and their effectiveness. However, they have mainly been evaluated on output rather than the process relating to the change theory underlying the intervention, and hence have seldom been rigorously evaluated. Thus little is known about how particular features of SBs can be taken into account when designing and implementing national programmes. This paper shows how realist analysis and programme theory may be used as a framework for evaluating, developing and improving national intervention programmes for the improvement of the work environment and reducing injuries in SBs. It illustrates this for a specific New Zealand intervention: the Workplace Safety Discount scheme and its implementation in the agriculture sector. In practice, realist analysis should be performed during the planning, implementation and management stages so that ongoing findings can be fed back to the participant social actors to help them make appropriate changes to enhance the likelihood of success.
Centre for Ergonomics, Occupational Safety and Health, School of Management, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. k.b.olsen@massey.ac.nz
Kirsten
K
Olsen
Stephen
S
Legg
Peter
P
Hasle
D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011582:Psychological Theory; D058012:Small Business; D013598:Systems Theory; D017132:Workplace