Revealing barriers and facilitators to use a new genetic test: comparison of three user involvement methods.
We compared three common user involvement methods in revealing barriers and facilitators from intended users that might influence their use of a new genetic test. The study was part of the development of a new genetic test on the susceptibility to hand eczema for nurses. Eighty student nurses participated in five focus groups (n = 33), 15 interviews (n = 15) or questionnaires (n = 32). For each method, data were collected until saturation. We compared the mean number of items and relevant remarks that could influence the use of the genetic test obtained per method, divided by the number of participants in that method. Thematic content analysis was performed using MAXQDA software. The focus groups revealed 30 unique items compared to 29 in the interviews and 21 in the questionnaires. The interviews produced more items and relevant remarks per participant (1.9 and 8.4 pp) than focus groups (0.9 and 4.8 pp) or questionnaires (0.7 and 2.3 pp). All three involvement methods revealed relevant barriers and facilitators to use a new genetic test. Focus groups and interviews revealed substantially more items than questionnaires. Furthermore, this study suggests a preference for the use of interviews because the number of items per participant was higher than for focus groups and questionnaires. This conclusion may be valid for other genetic tests as well.
Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box: 22700, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, m.d.rhebergen@amc.uva.nl.
Martijn D F
MD
Rhebergen
Maaike J
MJ
Visser
Maarten M
MM
Verberk
Annet F
AF
Lenderink
Frank J H
FJ
van Dijk
Sanja
S
Kezic
Carel T J
CT
Hulshof