Age or stage structure? A comparison of dynamic outcomes from discrete age- and stage-structured population models.
Discrete stage-structured density-dependent and discrete age-structured density-dependent population models are considered. Regarding the former, we prove that the model at hand is permanent (i.e., that the population will neither go extinct nor exhibit explosive oscillations) and given density dependent fecundity terms we also show that species with delayed semelparous life histories tend to be more stable than species which possess precocious semelparous life histories. Moreover, our findings together with results obtained from other stage-structured models seem to illustrate a fairly general ecological principle, namely that iteroparous species are more stable than semelparous species. Our analysis of various age-structured models does not necessarily support the conclusions above. In fact, species with precocious life histories now appear to possess better stability properties than species with delayed life histories, especially in the iteroparous case. We also show that there are dynamical outcomes from semelparous age-structured models which we are not able to capture in corresponding stage-structured cases. Finally, both age- and stage-structured population models may generate periodic dynamics of low period (either exact or approximate). The important prerequisite is to assume density-dependent survival probabilities.
Harstad University College, Havnegata 5, 9480 Harstad, Norway. Arild.Wikan@hih.no
Arild
A
Wikan
D000367:Age Factors; D000818:Animals; D050936:Basic Reproduction Number; D003198:Computer Simulation; D008954:Models, Biological; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012098:Reproduction