Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes.
Public reporting of quality information is designed to address information asymmetry in health care markets. Without public reporting, consumers may have little information to help them differentiate quality among providers, giving providers little incentive to compete on quality. Public reporting enables consumers to choose highly ranked providers. Using a four-year (2000-2003) panel dataset, we examine the relationship between report card scores and patient choice of nursing home after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began publicly reporting nursing home quality information on post-acute care in 2002. We find that the relationship between reported quality and nursing home choice is positive and statistically significant suggesting that patients were more likely to choose facilities with higher reported post-acute care quality after public reporting was initiated. However, the magnitude of the effect was small. We conclude that there has been minimal consumer response to information in the post-acute care market.
Philadelphia VA Medical Center and University of Pennsylvania, 1230 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Rachel M
RM
Werner
Edward C
EC
Norton
R Tamara
RT
Konetzka
Daniel
D
Polsky
D014487:Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003256:Community Participation / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D033181:Information Dissemination; D009735:Nursing Homes / Q000592:standards*; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014481:United States