Two approaches to tailoring treatment for cultural minority adolescents.
At this time, compared with mainstream (Caucasian) youth, cultural minority adolescents experience more severe substance-related consequences and are less likely to receive treatment. Although several empirically supported interventions (ESIs), such as motivational interviewing (MI), have been evaluated with mainstream adolescents, fewer published studies have investigated the fit and efficacy of these interventions with cultural minority adolescents. In addition, many empirical evaluations of ESIs have not explicitly attended to issues of culture, race, and socioeconomic background in their analyses. As a result, there is some question about the external validity of ESIs, particularly in disadvantaged cultural minority populations. This review seeks to take a step toward filling this gap, by addressing how to improve the fit and efficacy of ESIs like MI with cultural minority youth. Specifically, this review presents the existing literature on MI with cultural minority groups (adult and adolescent), proposes two approaches for evaluating and adapting this (or other) behavioral interventions, and elucidates the rationale, strengths, and potential liabilities of each tailoring approach.
The Mind Research Network, Pete & Nancy Domenici Hall, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA. swfeld@unm.edu
Sarah W
SW
Feldstein Ewing
Alisha M
AM
Wray
Hilary K
HK
Mead
Sue K
SK
Adams
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003469:Culture; D055317:Evidence-Based Practice; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007406:Interview, Psychological; D008297:Male; D008913:Minority Groups; D062405:Motivational Interviewing; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*