Picturing neuroscience research through a human rights lens: imaging first-episode schizophrenic treatment-naive individuals.
In this paper we examine imaging research involving first-episode schizophrenic treatment-naive individuals (FESTNIs) through a legal human rights lens; in particular, the lens of the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine Concerning Biomedical Research. We identify a number of ethical and legal hot spots highlighted by the Protocol, and offer a series of recommendations designed to ensure the human rights compatibility of this research. Subsequently, we argue that the lack of reporting on design elements related to ethical concerns frustrates commitments at the heart of the human rights approach, namely, transparency and openness to international scrutiny. To redress this problem, we introduce two norms for the first time: ethical transparency, and ethical reproducibility. When concluding, we offer a set of reporting guidelines designed to operationalize these norms in the context of imaging research involving FESTNIs. Though we will not make this case here, we believe that parallel reporting guidelines should be incorporated into other areas of research involving human subjects.
National Core for Neuroethics, Division of Neurology, the University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Koerner S124, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada. marleen.neuroethics@gmail.com
Marleen
M
Eijkholt
James A
JA
Anderson
Judy
J
Illes
D002170:Canada; D006805:Human Experimentation / Q000941:ethics*; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics; D059906:Neuroimaging / Q000941:ethics*; D061214:Patient Safety; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012559:Schizophrenia / Q000473:pathology*