Reactivated memories compete for expression after Pavlovian extinction.
We view the response decrement resulting from extinction treatment as an interference effect, in which the reactivated memory from acquisition competes with the reactivated memory from extinction for behavioral expression. For each of these memories, reactivation is proportional to both the strength of the stimulus-outcome association and the quality of the facilitatory cues for that association which are present at test. Here we review basic extinction and recovery-from-extinction phenomena, showing how these effects are explicable in this associative interference framework. Moreover, this orientation has and continues to dictate efficient manipulations for minimizing recovery from extinction. This in turn suggests procedures that might reduce relapse from exposure therapy for a number of psychological disorders. Some of these manipulations enhance the facilitatory cues from extinction that are present at test, others strengthen the extinction association (i.e., CS-no outcome), and yet others seem to work by a combination of these two processes.
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA.
Mario A
MA
Laborda
Ralph R
RR
Miller
D000818:Animals; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D003463:Cues; D005108:Extinction, Psychological; D008568:Memory; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011582:Psychological Theory