Reliability of standardized patients used in a communication study on international nurses in the United States of America.
As an evaluation method, standardized patients have a long history in medical education and research yet are less established in nursing. This paper explores the reliability of using standardized patients as the evaluative method in a communication competence pilot study with international nurses. Standardized patients and second raters scored the same encounters. We examined the scores by intraclass correlation coefficients. Anecdotal comments by the two types of raters were assessed qualitatively to highlight similarities and areas of difference between them. The results of reliability analysis for standardized patients scores for the composite variables of Establishing Communicative Rapport, Therapeutic Communication, Non-Verbal Communication, and Overall Satisfaction ranged from 0.755 (P < 0.01) to 0.42 (P = 0.09). In this study, the results showed standardized patient evaluation has moderate to substantial reliability when compared to second raters of the same set of clinical encounters. This is similar to the reliability established over many decades of medical research. Greater use of this dynamic and interactive technique may be beneficial to nursing education and research.
University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Nursing, Las Vegas, NV 89154-3018, USA.
Anne L
AL
Bolstad
Yu
Y
Xu
Jay J
JJ
Shen
Margaret
M
Covelli
Miriam
M
Torpey
D000328:Adult; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003142:Communication; D005260:Female; D005551:Foreign Professional Personnel; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research; D015588:Observer Variation; D016544:Patient Simulation; D010865:Pilot Projects; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014481:United States