Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to compare the one-year clinical performance of three restorative systems, which included a novel low-shrinkage composite and two bonding strategies.


METHODS
Twenty-five patients received three Class I (occlusal) or Class II restorations performed with one of three restorative systems: Filtek Silorane Restorative System (FS); Adper Scotchbond 1 XT, a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (XT); and Adper Scotchbond SE, a two-step self-etch adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (SE). All materials were applied following the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent observers evaluated the restorations at baseline, after six months, and after one year, according to the United States Public Health System modified criteria. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were computed to compare the behavior of the restorative systems; Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze the intrasystem data (α=0.05).


RESULTS
All restorations were evaluated at one year. FS and XT performed statistically similarly at one year, but marginal staining for SE was statistically worse. Intrasystem comparisons between baseline and one year also showed deterioration of marginal staining for SE, while a deterioration of the marginal adaptation was recorded for both SE and FS. XT was the only system for which there was no statistical change of the parameters measured in this study.


CONCLUSIONS
Both restorative systems using self-etch adhesives showed a tendency to degradation of marginal adaptation after one year of clinical use, compared to baseline values. Although the clinical performance of FS was deemed acceptable after one year, this study did not find any advantage of the silorane-based composite over the methacrylate-based composite. The low-shrinkage associated with FS may not be a determinant factor for clinical success.
Department of Stomatology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
B
B
Baracco
J
J
Perdigão
E
E
Cabrera
I
I
Giráldez
L
L
Ceballos
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003116:Color; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D001840:Dental Bonding / Q000379:methods; D003736:Dental Cavity Lining / Q000379:methods; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation / Q000145:classification; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry*; D003775:Dental Polishing / Q000295:instrumentation; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000145:classification*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D058105:Polymerization; D019279:Resin Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D062047:Silorane Resins; D012833:Siloxanes / Q000737:chemistry; D013499:Surface Properties; D055815:Young Adult
D003188:Composite Resins; D003764:Dental Materials; C444701:Filtek Z250; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D019279:Resin Cements; D062047:Silorane Resins; D012833:Siloxanes; C555513:silorane composite resin; C067790:Vitrabond; C041330:Scotchbond