title: Discrepant responding across self-report measures of men's coercive and aggressive sexual strategies.
abstract: Researchers have worked to refine the measurement of women's experiences with sexual victimization. Less is known about the validity and reliability of measures that assess men's use of sexual coercion and aggression. These studies explore the consistency of men's responses to two distinct, but similar, measures of sexual coercion and aggression. The two measures both assess historical use of verbal coercion, sexual assault involving drugs or alcohol, and sexual assault through threat or force. Study 1 used college men as participants (N = 398), whereas Study 2 used a mixed sample of college and community men (N = 184). In both studies, participants' responses were largely inconsistent across the two measures. This article explores potential measurement issues that may account for the observed reporting discrepancies and offers suggestions for future research.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Missouri–St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA. emilystrang@umsl.edu
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Strang
authors.forename: Zoë D
authors.initials: ZD
authors.lastname: Peterson
authors.forename: Yvette N
authors.initials: YN
authors.lastname: Hill
authors.forename: Julia R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Heiman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000374:Aggression / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D057566:Self Report / Q000592:standards*; D012742:Sex Offenses / Q000523:psychology*; D012725:Sexual Behavior / Q000523:psychology*; D055815:Young Adult