title: Strategies and tools for preventing neurotoxicity: to test, to predict and how to do it.
abstract: A change in paradigm is needed in the prevention of toxic effects on the nervous system, moving from its present reliance solely on data from animal testing to a prediction model mostly based on in vitro toxicity testing and in silico modeling. According to the report published by the National Research Council (NRC) of the US National Academies of Science, high-throughput in vitro tests will provide evidence for alterations in "toxicity pathways" as the best possible method of large scale toxicity prediction. The challenges to implement this proposal are enormous, and provide much room for debate. While many efforts address the technical aspects of implementing the vision, many questions around it need also to be addressed. Is the overall strategy the only one to be pursued? How can we move from current to future paradigms? Will we ever be able to reliably model for chronic and developmental neurotoxicity in vitro? This paper summarizes four presentations from a symposium held at the International Neurotoxicology Conference held in Xi'an, China, in June 2011. A. Li reviewed the current guidelines for neurotoxicity and developmental neurotoxicity testing, and discussed the major challenges existing to realize the NCR vision for toxicity testing. J. Llorens reviewed the biology of mammalian toxic avoidance in view of present knowledge on the physiology and molecular biology of the chemical senses, taste and smell. This background information supports the hypothesis that relating in vivo toxicity to chemical epitope descriptors that mimic the chemical encoding performed by the olfactory system may provide a way to the long term future of complete in silico toxicity prediction. S. Ceccatelli reviewed the implementation of rodent and human neural stem cells (NSCs) as models for in vitro toxicity testing that measures parameters such as cell proliferation, differentiation and migration. These appear to be sensitive endpoints that can identify substances with developmental neurotoxic potential. C. Suñol reviewed the use of primary neuronal cultures in testing for neurotoxicity of environmental pollutants, including the study of the effects of persistent exposures and/or in differentiating cells, which allow recording of effects that can be extrapolated to human developmental neurotoxicity.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physiological Sciences II, Universitat de Barcelona, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain. jllorens@ub.edu
authors.forename: Jordi
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Llorens
authors.forename: Abby A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Sandra
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ceccatelli
authors.forename: Cristina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Suñol
mesh_terms: D000826:Animal Testing Alternatives; D000818:Animals; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D057166:High-Throughput Screening Assays; D006801:Humans; D023421:Models, Animal; D009420:Nervous System / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000473:pathology; D009474:Neurons / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000473:pathology; D009488:Neurosciences / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D020258:Neurotoxicity Syndromes / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends