title: What differentiates episodic future thinking from complex scene imagery?
abstract: We investigated the contributions of familiarity of setting, self-relevance and self-projection in time to episodic future thinking. The role of familiarity of setting was assessed, in Experiment 1, by comparing episodic future thoughts to autobiographical future events supposed to occur in unfamiliar settings. The role of self-relevance was assessed, in Experiment 2, by comparing episodic future thoughts to future events involving familiar others. The role of self-projection in time was assessed, in both Experiments, by comparing episodic future thoughts to autobiographical events that were not temporal in nature. Results indicated that episodic future thoughts were more clearly represented than autobiographical future events occurring in unfamiliar setting and future events involving familiar others. Our results also revealed that episodic future thoughts were indistinguishable from autobiographical atemporal events with respect to both subjective and objective detail ratings. These results suggest that future and atemporal events are mentally represented in a similar way.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Suor Orsola Benincasa University, Via Suor Orsola, 10, 80135 Naples, Italy.
authors.forename: Stefania
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: de Vito
authors.forename: Nadia
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Gamboz
authors.forename: Maria A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Brandimonte
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D008297:Male; D061212:Memory, Episodic; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D013850:Thinking