title: Ethical dilemmas in journal publication.
abstract: Physicians often face tremendous pressures and incentives to publish, sometimes leading to a compromise of ethical standards, either consciously or unconsciously. From the vantage of ethical authorship, we discuss what constitutes authorship; avoidance of ghost authorship; plagiarism, as well as self-plagiarism and duplicate publication; falsification; and fabrication. Editors also face ethical challenges, including how best to manage peer-review bias, to address reviewer tardiness, and to locate reviewers with appropriate expertise and professionalism. Editors need to deal with authors who fragment their work into multiple publications to enhance their curriculum vitae ("salami factor"), as well as to manage the financial benefits of advertising and to avoid conflicts of interest for the journal. Both authors and editors should be straightforward and principled throughout the publication process.
authors.affiliation: University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
authors.forename: Olubukola
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Babalola
authors.forename: Jane M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Grant-Kels
authors.forename: Lawrence Charles
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Parish
mesh_terms: D000329:Advertising; D001319:Authorship; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics*; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D015713:Duplicate Publications as Topic; D006801:Humans; D010380:Peer Review; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000941:ethics* / Q000592:standards; D015714:Plagiarism; D017594:Publication Bias; D011643:Publishing / Q000941:ethics*; D015871:Scientific Misconduct