title: When will selective lymphadenectomy become standard of care in melanoma?
abstract: In 2006 Meiron Thomas, writing in the British Journal of Surgery, made the following statement about the value of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a staging procedure in cutaneous malignant melanoma (1): "Perhaps a more important concern for those hoping to gain reassurance from accurate nodal staging relates to positive SN(S) that are prognostically inaccurate, information that can be devastating for the patient, leading to unnecessary lymphadenectomy and possibly unnecessary adjuvant therapy". In September 2011 Meyrick Ross and Gershenwald, writing in the Journal of Surgical Oncology, made the following statement about the management of patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma (2): "Sentinel node biopsy has become an important component of the initial management of many of these patients for accurate staging of regional lymph nodes, as well as enhanced regional disease control and improved survival in the patients with microscopically involved nodes." These two extremes have polarized the debate about the proper management of patients with malignant melanoma and have lead to widespread confusion and dismay amongst practicing clinicians, GP's and patient groups. In fact both statements are inaccurate, misleading and result from a false reading of the literature and in the case of Ross and Gershenwald a false interpretation of their own data (3). The following article explains why.
authors.affiliation: Cromwell Hospital, London, UK. robin@russelljones.demon.co.uk
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Russell-Jones
mesh_terms: D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D008197:Lymph Node Excision / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008545:Melanoma / Q000556:secondary / Q000601:surgery*; D021701:Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D012878:Skin Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D059039:Standard of Care