title: Reappraising the surgical approach on the perforated gastroduodenal ulcer: should gastric resection be abandoned?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Advancements in medical care for peptic ulcer disease (PUD) have reduced the need for invasive surgical procedures such as gastric resection (GR). Community-based PUD studies from a large sampling of PUD patients designed to analyze hospital resource use and outcomes after different surgical procedures have been rare. We aimed to exhaustively reappraise the risk factors and patient demographics that affect PUD patient recoveries after GR compared to those after simple closure (SC).
  
  
  METHODS
  We used a Japanese administrative database for 6 consecutive months each year between 2006 and 2010. The database included a total of 68,432 PUD patients; we analyzed 6,334 perforation cases and 3,148 cases of patients who underwent GR or SC. Study variables were demographics, comorbidities, characteristics of PUD, and operative day. Study outcomes that were analyzed included mortality, postoperative complications, ventilation administration, postoperative blood transfusions, length of stay, total charges, operating room (OR) time, and the postoperative fasting period (defined as the day of surgery to the day oral food intake was resumed.) To reduce selection bias in study procedures and to control the variation in hospital practice, a propensity score (PS) matching cohort analysis and a mixed linear regression model were used to assess the effects of GR on the outcomes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In 699 hospitals, 322 GRs and 2,826 SCs were observed. Younger age, duodenal ulcers, preexisting anemia and an operative day no more than 24hours were significant associated with the choice of SCs. No significant differences were observed in study outcomes after either GR or SC; more postoperative blood transfusions and longer OR times but shorter postoperative fasting periods were observed after GR. Longer OR times, ventilation and postoperative blood transfusion were significantly associated with mortality. Not GR but longer OR times use of ventilation and complications were the most significant indicators of increased resource use.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There were no major significant differences in GR when compared to SC with regards to patient recoveries. Surgeons should obtain the skills and establish strategies to optimize either type of surgical procedure including minimizing OR time and establishing the best perioperative critical care.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Peptic ulcer perforation; Simple closure; Gastric resection; Outcome; Resource use.
authors.affiliation: Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Health Care Administration and Management, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
authors.forename: Kazuaki
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kuwabara
authors.forename: Shinya
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Matsuda
authors.forename: Kiyohide
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Fushimi
authors.forename: Koichi B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Ishikawa
authors.forename: Hiromasa
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Horiguchi
authors.forename: Kenji
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Fujimori