title: Felicitometric hermeneutics: interpreting quality of life measurements.
abstract: The use of quality of life (QOL) outcomes in clinical trials is increasing as a number of practical, ethical, methodological, and regulatory reasons for their use have become apparent. It is important, then, that QOL measurements and differences between QOL scores be readily interpretable. We study interpretation in two contexts: when determining QOL and when basing decisions on QOL differences. We consider both clinical situations involving individual patients and research contexts, e.g., randomized clinical trials, involving groups of patients. We note the ethical importance of such understanding: proper interpretation and communication facilitate health care decision making. Communication that facilitates interpretation is of moral significance since better communication can attenuate ethical problems and inform choices. Much of what is communication worthy about QOL assessments is determined by the particular QOL instrument used in the assessment and how it is administered. In practice, these choices will be driven by the purpose of the assessment, but, it is argued, to maximize understanding, we should combine the information garnered from traditional standardized QOL instruments, from individualized QOL assessments, and from a recently proposed dialogic paradigm, where QOL is determined by shared conversation regarding the interpretation of texts. And, while some studies can surely succeed using abbreviated methods of administration (e.g., postal surveys may suffice for certain purposes), we will focus on methods of administration involving interviewer-respondent interaction. We suggest that during the QOL elicitation process, interviewer and respondent should engage in a two-way conversation in order to achieve a shared understanding of the "answers" to QOL "questions" and, finally, to reach a shared interpretation of the individual's QOL.
authors.affiliation: Institutional Review Board, Health Sciences/Behavioral Sciences, University of Michigan, 540 East Liberty, Ste 202, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA. chuckk@umich.edu
authors.forename: Charles J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Kowalski
authors.forename: Jan L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Bernheim
authors.forename: Nancy Adair
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Birk
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Theuns
mesh_terms: D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D006240:Happiness; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D011788:Quality of Life / Q000523:psychology; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States