title: State sovereign standing: often overlooked, but not forgotten.
abstract: Critics of Virginia's challenge to the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act have asserted that Virginia lacked standing to even raise the issue. Such criticism is inconsistent with foundational understandings of the role of states in providing a check on federal power and with the modern standing jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, especially as reflected in the Court's decisions regarding a state's sovereign interest in defending its code of laws. This Article demonstrates that, as a matter of constitutional design and history, as well as under relevant precedents, Virginia clearly had and has standing to bring its challenge.
authors.affiliation: Attorney General of Virginia, USA.
authors.forename: Kenneth T
authors.initials: KT
authors.lastname: Cuccinelli
authors.forename: E Duncan
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Getchell
authors.forename: Wesley G
authors.initials: WG
authors.lastname: Russell
mesh_terms: D035082:Federal Government; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D019458:Insurance Coverage / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D037141:Mandatory Programs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D058991:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013219:State Government; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D014481:United States; D014768:Virginia