title: Strategic laparoscopic surgery for improved cosmesis in general and bariatric surgery: analysis of initial 127 cases.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Strategic laparoscopic surgery for improved cosmesis (SLIC) is a less invasive surgical approach than conventional laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and safety of SLIC for general and bariatric surgical operations. Additionally, we compared the outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with those performed by the SLIC technique.
  
  
  METHODS
  In an academic medical center, from April 2008 to December 2010, 127 patients underwent SLIC procedures: 38 SLIC cholecystectomy, 56 SLIC gastric banding, 26 SLIC sleeve gastrectomy, 1 SLIC gastrojejunostomy, and 6 SLIC appendectomy. SLIC sleeve gastrectomy was initially performed through a single 4.0-cm supraumbilical incision with extraction of the gastric specimen through the same incision. The technique evolved to laparoscopic incisions that were all placed within the umbilicus and suprapubic region.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no 30-day or in-hospital mortalities or 30-day re-admissions or re-operations. For SLIC cholecystectomy, gastric banding, appendectomy, and gastrojejunostomy, conversion to conventional laparoscopy occurred in 5.3%, 5.4%, 0%, and 0%, respectively; there were no major or minor postoperative complications. For SLIC sleeve gastrectomy, there were no significant differences in mean operative time and length of hospital stay compared with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; 1 (3.8%) of 26 SLIC patients required conversion to five-port laparoscopy. There were no major complications. Minor complications occurred in 7.7% in the SLIC sleeve group versus 8.3% in the laparoscopic sleeve group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  SLIC in general and bariatric operations is technically feasible, safe, and associated with a low rate of conversion to conventional laparoscopy. Compared with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, SLIC sleeve gastrectomy can be performed without a prolonged operative time with comparable perioperative outcomes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California 92868, USA. ninhn@uci.edu
authors.forename: Ninh T
authors.initials: NT
authors.lastname: Nguyen
authors.forename: Brian R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Kevin M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Reavis
authors.forename: Xuan-Mai T
authors.initials: XM
authors.lastname: Nguyen
authors.forename: Brian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Nguyen
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Stamos
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001062:Appendectomy / Q000379:methods; D001064:Appendicitis / Q000150:complications; D050110:Bariatric Surgery / Q000379:methods*; D002763:Cholecystectomy / Q000379:methods; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005743:Gastrectomy / Q000379:methods*; D015390:Gastric Bypass / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D009765:Obesity / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome