title: From social network (centralized vs. decentralized) to collective decision-making (unshared vs. shared consensus).
abstract: Relationships we have with our friends, family, or colleagues influence our personal decisions, as well as decisions we make together with others. As in human beings, despotism and egalitarian societies seem to also exist in animals. While studies have shown that social networks constrain many phenomena from amoebae to primates, we still do not know how consensus emerges from the properties of social networks in many biological systems. We created artificial social networks that represent the continuum from centralized to decentralized organization and used an agent-based model to make predictions about the patterns of consensus and collective movements we observed according to the social network. These theoretical results showed that different social networks and especially contrasted ones--star network vs. equal network--led to totally different patterns. Our model showed that, by moving from a centralized network to a decentralized one, the central individual seemed to lose its leadership in the collective movement's decisions. We, therefore, showed a link between the type of social network and the resulting consensus. By comparing our theoretical data with data on five groups of primates, we confirmed that this relationship between social network and consensus also appears to exist in animal societies.
authors.affiliation: Unit of Social Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus Plaine, Bd du Triomphe, Brussels, Belgium. cedric.sueur@iphc.cnrs.fr
authors.forename: Cédric
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sueur
authors.forename: Jean-Louis
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Deneubourg
authors.forename: Odile
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Petit
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D032921:Consensus; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011336:Probability; D012919:Social Behavior; D012944:Social Support