title: Backward versus forward blocking: evidence for performance-based models of human contingency learning.
abstract: Two types of theories are usually invoked to account for cue-interaction effects in human-contingency learning, performance-based theories, such as the comparator hypothesis and statistical models, and learning-based theories, such as associative models. Interestingly, the former models predict two important cue-interaction effects, forward and backward blocking, should affect responding in a similar manner, whereas learning-based models predict the effect of forward blocking should be larger than the effect of backward blocking. Previous experiments involved important methodological problems, and results have been contradictory. The present experiment was designed to explore potential asymmetries between forward and backward blocking. Analyses yielded similar effect sizes, thereby favoring the explanation by performance-based models.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Málaga, Spain. david.luque@gmail.com
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Luque
authors.forename: Miguel A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Vadillo
mesh_terms: D001245:Association Learning; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological