title: [Physical restraint use in critical care units. Perceptions of patients and their families].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The use of physical restraints in Intensive Care Units (ICU) is common although little is known about patients' and relatives' perceptions of this use.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  1) To analyze the prevalence and use of physical restraints in a general adult ICU; 2) to know the perceptions of patients who experienced use of physical restraints and; 3) to know the perceptions of relatives of patients who used physical restraints.
  
  
  METHODS
  This descriptive study, which used both quantitative and qualitative methods, was carried out in an adult ICU. For the first objective, all the patients (101) who had used any kind of physical restraint were analysed. For the second and third objectives, 30 patients and 30 relatives were interviewed using the guidelines of Strumpf & Evans as modified by Hardin (1993). All interviews were recorded, fully transcribed and then submitted to a language content analysis using the method of Hsieh & Shannon.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The only physical restraint used was the wrist restraint with a prevalence of 43.47%. Seventy-two percent of patients wore the restraint ≤12h and 28%>12h. Analysis of the patient interviews revealed 4 main themes: acceptance of the restraint conditioned by beliefs and information provided; feelings and sensations caused by the use of the restraint; alternatives proposed and future repercussions. Three themes emerged from the interviews with relatives: impressions caused by the use of the restrictions; reasons for accepting or rejecting them; alternatives to the use of restraints.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most patients used physical restraints for a short period of time and only the wrist restraint was used. Patients using physical restraints and their relatives expressed a wide range of feelings and sensations, with no negative future repercussions. In general, they agreed with the use of restraints although more precise information would lead to greater acceptance.
authors.affiliation: Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España. anabelp@unav.es
authors.forename: A I
authors.initials: AI
authors.lastname: Pérez de Ciriza Amatriain
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Nicolás Olmedo
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Goñi Viguria
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Regaira Martínez
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Margall Coscojuela
authors.forename: M C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Asiain Erro
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001290:Attitude; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005190:Family / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012149:Restraint, Physical; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires