title: Apparent thixotropic properties of saline/glycerol drops with biotinylated antibodies on streptavidin-coated glass slides: implications for bacterial capture on antibody microarrays.
abstract: The thixotropic-like properties of saline/glycerol drops, containing biotinylated capture antibodies, on streptavidin-coated glass slides have been investigated, along with their implications for bacterial detection in a fluorescent microarray immunoassay. The thixotropic-like nature of 60:40 saline-glycerol semisolid droplets (with differing amounts of antibodies) was observed when bacteria were captured, and their presence detected using a fluorescently-labeled antibody. Semisolid, gel-like drops of biotinylated capture antibody became liquefied and moved, and then returned to semisolid state, during the normal immunoassay procedures for bacterial capture and detection. Streaking patterns were observed that indicated thixotropic-like characteristics, and this appeared to have allowed excess biotinylated capture antibody to participate in bacterial capture and detection. When developing a microarray for bacterial detection, this must be considered for optimization. For example, with the appropriate concentration of antibody (in this study, 0.125 ng/nL), spots with increased diameter at the point of contact printing (and almost no streaking) were produced, resulting in a maximal signal. With capture antibody concentrations greater than 0.125 ng/nL, the excess biotinylated capture antibody (i.e., that which was residing in the three-dimensional, semisolid droplet space above the surface) was utilized to capture more bacteria. Similarly, when the immunoassay was performed within a hydrophobic barrier (i.e., without a coverslip), brighter spots with increased signal were observed. In addition, when higher concentrations of cells (∼10(8) cells/mL) were available for capture, the importance of unbound capture antibody in the semisolid droplets became apparent because washing off the excess, unbound biotinylated capture antibody before the immunoassay was performed reduced the signal intensity by nearly 50%. This reduction in signal was not observed with lower concentrations of cells (∼10(6) cells/mL). With increased volumes of capture antibody, abnormal spots were visualized, along with decreased signal intensity, after bacterial detection, indicating that the increased droplet volume detrimentally affected the immunoassay.
authors.affiliation: Microbial Biophysics and Residue Chemistry Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, PA 19038, USA; E-Mails:  david_m_albin@yahoo.com ;  sue.reed@ars.usda.gov ;  shui.tu@ars.usda.gov.
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Albin
authors.forename: Andrew G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Gehring
authors.forename: Sue A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Reed
authors.forename: Shu-I
authors.initials: SI
authors.lastname: Tu