title: Alternative HbA1c cutoffs to identify high-risk adults for diabetes prevention: a cost-effectiveness perspective.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  New recommendations about the use of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for diagnosing diabetes have stimulated a debate about the optimal HbA1c cutoff to identify prediabetes for preventive intervention.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the cost effectiveness associated with the alternative HbA1c cutoffs for identifying prediabetes.
  
  
  METHODS
  A Markov simulation model was used to examine the cost effectiveness associated with a progressive 0.1% decrease in the HbA1c cutoff from 6.4% to 5.5%. The target population was the U.S. nondiabetic population aged ≥18 years. The simulation sample was created using the data of nondiabetic American adults from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES 1999-2006). People identified as having prediabetes were assumed to receive a preventive intervention, with effectiveness the same as that in the Diabetes Prevention Program study under a high-cost intervention (HCI) scenario and in the Promoting a Lifestyle of Activity and Nutrition for Working to Alter the Risk of Diabetes study under a low-cost intervention (LCI) scenario. The analysis was conducted for a lifetime horizon from a healthcare system perspective.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Lowering the HbA1c cutoff would increase the health benefits of the preventive interventions at higher costs. For the HCI, lowering the HbA1c cutoff from 6.0% to 5.9% and from 5.9% to 5.8% would result in $27,000 and $34,000 per QALY gained, respectively. Continuing to decrease the cutoff from 5.8% to 5.7%, from 5.7% to 5.6%, and from 5.6% to 5.5% would cost $45,000, $58,000, and $96,000 per QALY gained, respectively. For the LCI, lowering the HbA1c cutoff from 6.0% to 5.9% and from 5.9% to 5.8% would result in $24,000 and $27,000 per QALY gained, respectively. Continuing to lower the cutoff from 5.8% to 5.7%, 5.7% to 5.6%, and 5.6% to 5.5% would cost $34,000, $43,000 and $70,000 per QALY gained, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Lowering the HbA1c cutoff for prediabetes leads to less cost-effective preventive interventions. Assuming a conventional $50,000/QALY cost-effectiveness benchmark, the HbA1c cutoffs of 5.7% and higher were found to be cost effective. Lowering the cutoff from 5.7% to 5.6% also may be cost effective, however, if the costs of preventive interventions were to be lowered.
authors.affiliation: Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA. xzhuo@cdc.gov
authors.forename: Xiaohui
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Zhuo
authors.forename: Ping
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Selvin
authors.forename: Thomas J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Hoerger
authors.forename: Ronald T
authors.initials: RT
authors.lastname: Ackermann
authors.forename: Rui
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Kai McKeever
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Bullard
authors.forename: Edward W
authors.initials: EW
authors.lastname: Gregg
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006442:Glycated Hemoglobin / Q000032:analysis*; D006306:Health Surveys / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008390:Markov Chains; D011236:Prediabetic State / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy; D011314:Preventive Health Services / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D012307:Risk Factors; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D006442:Glycated Hemoglobin