title: Debate on the Chernobyl disaster: on the causes of Chernobyl overestimation.
abstract: After the Chernobyl accident, many publications appeared that overestimated its medical consequences. Some of them are discussed in this article. Among the motives for the overestimation were anti-nuclear sentiments, widespread among some adherents of the Green movement; however, their attitude has not been wrong: nuclear facilities should have been prevented from spreading to overpopulated countries governed by unstable regimes and regions where conflicts and terrorism cannot be excluded. The Chernobyl accident has hindered worldwide development of atomic industry. Today, there are no alternatives to nuclear power: nonrenewable fossil fuels will become more and more expensive, contributing to affluence in the oil-producing countries and poverty in the rest of the world. Worldwide introduction of nuclear energy will become possible only after a concentration of authority within an efficient international executive. This will enable construction of nuclear power plants in optimally suitable places, considering all sociopolitical, geographic, geologic, and other preconditions. In this way, accidents such as that in Japan in 2011 will be prevented.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia. sjargin@mail.ru
authors.forename: Sergei V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: Jargin
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D047852:Chernobyl Nuclear Accident; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects; D005060:Europe / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D007390:International Agencies; D055848:Nuclear Power Plants; D011642:Publications; D011832:Radiation Injuries / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology; D013997:Time Factors; D014455:Ukraine / Q000453:epidemiology