title: Quality and safety of bovine clones and their products.
abstract: A multidisciplinary research programme was developed to get a scientific expertise for the quality assessment of products obtained from cloned livestock. Thirty-seven bovine Holstein female clones of five different genotypes and their products were analysed in comparison with 38 control animals obtained by conventional artificial insemination and raised under the same conditions at the same experimental farm. Animal evaluation included over 150 criteria and more than 10 000 measurements to check the physiological status and health over a 3-year period. All the parameters studied were in the normal range for age and breed, but some significant differences were detected between clone and control groups in terms of delayed onset of puberty in clones, higher neutrophil counts in haematology or lower biochemical plasma concentrations of gamma glutamyl transferase. Milk and meat analyses were conformable to expected values. We, however, found some differences in fatty acid (FA) composition of milk and muscle suggesting a possible deviation in lipid metabolism as assessed by higher delta-9 desaturase activity indexes in both milk and muscles from clones compared with controls. Repeated muscle biopsies in the semitendinosus muscle of the same animals demonstrated a higher oxidative activity in muscle of young clones (8 months of age) compared with controls, suggesting a delayed muscle maturation in clones. Nutritional evaluation of milk and meat using the rat feeding trials did not show any difference between clone and control products for food intake, growth rate, body composition of the rats, nor for possible allergenicity. Possible reactivation of bovine endogenous retroviruses (BERVs) was analysed and compared between normal and cloned cattle. As expected, these BERV sequences are not transcribed and no RNA was detected in the blood of clones, donor animals or controls; therefore, it may be assumed that the sanitary risk associated with BERV sequences is not higher in cattle derived from somatic nuclear transfer than in cattle born from conventional reproduction. Our results confirm that the quality and safety of products (milk and meat) from adult and clinically healthy cloned cattle is globally similar to normal animals. However, from a strictly biological point of view, the slightly delayed maturation we observed in the muscle of clones together with some marginal differences identified in FA composition of both muscle and milk, point to the need for more refined analysis to totally exclude any risks from the consumption of those products.
authors.affiliation: 1INRA, UMR 1198; ENVA; CNRS, FRE2857 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78352 Jouy en Josas, France.
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Heyman
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Chavatte-Palmer
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Fromentin
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Berthelot
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Jurie
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bas
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dubarry
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Mialot
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Remy
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Richard
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Martignat
authors.forename: X
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Vignon
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Renard