title: Why do species co-occur? A test of alternative hypotheses describing abiotic differences in sympatry versus allopatry using spadefoot toads.
abstract: Areas of co-occurrence between two species (sympatry) are often thought to arise in regions where abiotic conditions are conducive to both species and are therefore intermediate between regions where either species occurs alone (allopatry). Depending on historical factors or interactions between species, however, sympatry might not differ from allopatry, or, alternatively, sympatry might actually be more extreme in abiotic conditions relative to allopatry. Here, we evaluate these three hypothesized patterns for how sympatry compares to allopatry in abiotic conditions. We use two species of congeneric spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata and S. bombifrons, as our study system. To test these hypotheses, we created ecological niche models (specifically using Maxent) for both species to create a map of the joint probability of occurrence of both species. Using the results of these models, we identified three types of locations: two where either species was predicted to occur alone (i.e., allopatry for S. multiplicata and allopatry for S. bombifrons) and one where both species were predicted to co-occur (i.e., sympatry). We then compared the abiotic environment between these three location types and found that sympatry was significantly hotter and drier than the allopatric regions. Thus, sympatry was not intermediate between the alternative allopatric sites. Instead, sympatry occurred at one extreme of the conditions occupied by both species. We hypothesize that biotic interactions in these extreme environments facilitate co-occurrence. Specifically, hybridization between S. bombifrons females and S. multiplicata males may facilitate co-occurrence by decreasing development time of tadpoles. Additionally, the presence of alternative food resources in more extreme conditions may preclude competitive exclusion of one species by the other. This work has implications for predicting how interacting species will respond to climate change, because species interactions may facilitate survival in extreme habitats.
authors.affiliation: Department of Geography, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America. chunco@email.unc.edu
authors.forename: Amanda J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Chunco
authors.forename: Todd
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Jobe
authors.forename: Karin S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Pfennig
mesh_terms: D000064:Acclimatization; D000818:Animals; D001001:Anura / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development*; D044822:Biodiversity; D057231:Climate Change; D004777:Environment; D049810:Genetic Speciation; D005843:Geography; D008954:Models, Biological; D009656:North America; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D013045:Species Specificity; D061350:Sympatry