title: Too close to home. Factors predicting meat avoidance.
abstract: In most societies, meat is valued more highly, yet tabooed more frequently, than any other type of food. Past research suggests that people avoid eating animals they consider similar to themselves, but what specific factors influence which they eat, and which they avoid? Across an array of samples from the USA, Canada, Hong Kong, and India, perceived animal intelligence and appearance emerged as the chief predictors of disgust at the thought of eating them. Furthermore, reflecting on animals' psychological attributes increased reported disgust, especially among Euro-Canadians and Euro-Americans, suggesting that these factors are more influential in shaping disgust in individualistic cultural contexts. Concordant with past research, disgust was a major predictor of willingness to eat animals, but social influence (frequency of consumption by friends and family) also emerged as a strong predictor, especially among Hong Kong Chinese and Indians, providing evidence that one's friends and family have a stronger influence on one's food choices in collectivistic cultural contexts.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 3126 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. lauren.Williams@mcri.edu.au
authors.forename: Matthew B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Ruby
authors.forename: Steven J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Heine
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D044466:Asian People / Q000523:psychology; D002170:Canada; D002417:Cattle; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D004644:Emotions; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D033062:Friends; D006723:Hong Kong; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D008297:Male; D008460:Meat; D008875:Middle Aged; D011200:Poultry; D012931:Social Environment; D014481:United States; D044465:White People / Q000523:psychology; D055815:Young Adult