title: Structural and functional analysis of the semitendinosus tendon after harvest for soft tissue reconstructive procedures: a dynamic ultrasonographic study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the potential for regeneration of the hamstring tendons after harvesting for various soft tissue reconstructive procedures, this study uses dynamic, high-resolution ultrasound to evaluate the presence of any tissue in the harvest gap and to characterize tissue functionality.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using ipsilateral hamstring autograft were identified in the database of a single surgeon. Dynamic 12-MHz sonographic imaging was used to evaluate the ipsilateral and contralateral (control) semitendinosus tendons from their insertion sites to proximal muscle bellies. The presence or absence and echogenicity of tissue in the harvest defect, tissue appearance, degree of retraction of the proximal tendon stump, thickness of gap tissue, and motion of the proximal tendon stump were recorded. Data were analysed with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, sign or binomial tests, with significance of P < 0.05.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eighteen knees in 15 patients (aged 17-51 years) were studied. The proximal amputated stump was retracted an average of 9.0 ± 7.6 cm (range, 0-18 cm; P = 0.0063). With dynamic testing, 9 of 15 knees demonstrated decreased excursion of the proximal tendon stump when compared to the native, contralateral muscle-tendon unit (P = 0.0039). Tissue was detected in the harvest gap in nine knees, five of which had harvest gap tissue with a disorganized appearance compared to the native tendon (P < 0.0001). Six of these nine knees had tissue in the gap demonstrating either less or no excursion with active knee flexion when compared to the native, contralateral side (P = 0.0313).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The presence of tissue in the harvest gap after ACL reconstruction is variable. When tissue is present, there is proximal retraction of the musculotendinous junction and disorganized appearance of the tissue that does not demonstrate normal excursion or physiological function similar to the native muscle-tendon unit.
  
  
  METHODS
  Case series, Level IV.
authors.affiliation: MedSport, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Lobby C, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA. abedi@med.umich.edu
authors.forename: Asheesh
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bedi
authors.forename: Ramesh C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Srinivasan
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Salata
authors.forename: Brian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Downie
authors.forename: Jon A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Jacobson
authors.forename: Edward M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Wojtys
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D016118:Anterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000601:surgery*; D000070598:Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; D059549:Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013710:Tendons / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000502:physiology / Q000637:transplantation*; D014463:Ultrasonography; D055815:Young Adult