title: Does the integration of haptic and visual cues reduce the effect of a biased visual reference frame on the subjective head orientation?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The selection of appropriate frames of reference (FOR) is a key factor in the elaboration of spatial perception and the production of robust interaction with our environment. The extent to which we perceive the head axis orientation (subjective head orientation, SHO) with both accuracy and precision likely contributes to the efficiency of these spatial interactions. A first goal of this study was to investigate the relative contribution of both the visual and egocentric FOR (centre-of-mass) in the SHO processing. A second goal was to investigate humans' ability to process SHO in various sensory response modalities (visual, haptic and visuo-haptic), and the way they modify the reliance to either the visual or egocentric FORs. A third goal was to question whether subjects combined visual and haptic cues optimally to increase SHO certainty and to decrease the FORs disruption effect.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Thirteen subjects were asked to indicate their SHO while the visual and/or egocentric FORs were deviated. Four results emerged from our study. First, visual rod settings to SHO were altered by the tilted visual frame but not by the egocentric FOR alteration, whereas no haptic settings alteration was observed whether due to the egocentric FOR alteration or the tilted visual frame. These results are modulated by individual analysis. Second, visual and egocentric FOR dependency appear to be negatively correlated. Third, the response modality enrichment appears to improve SHO. Fourth, several combination rules of the visuo-haptic cues such as the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), Winner-Take-All (WTA) or Unweighted Mean (UWM) rule seem to account for SHO improvements. However, the UWM rule seems to best account for the improvement of visuo-haptic estimates, especially in situations with high FOR incongruence. Finally, the data also indicated that FOR reliance resulted from the application of UWM rule. This was observed more particularly, in the visual dependent subject.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Taken together, these findings emphasize the importance of identifying individual spatial FOR preferences to assess the efficiency of our interaction with the environment whilst performing spatial tasks.
authors.affiliation: Univ Paris Sud, URCIAMS-Motor Control & Perception team, Orsay, France. marc.gueguen@u-psud.fr
authors.forename: Marc
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gueguen
authors.forename: Nicolas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Vuillerme
authors.forename: Brice
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Isableu
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003463:Cues; D006257:Head; D006801:Humans; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D013037:Spatial Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D055698:Touch Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*