title: Transcending disciplines: Scientific styles in studies of the brain in mid-twentieth century America.
abstract: Much scholarship in the history of cybernetics has focused on the far-reaching cultural dimensions of the movement. What has garnered less attention are efforts by cyberneticians such as Warren McCulloch and Norbert Wiener to transform scientific practice in an array of disciplines in the biomedical sciences, and the complex ways these efforts were received by members of traditional disciplines. In a quest for scientific unity that had a decidedly imperialistic flavour, cyberneticians sought to apply practices common in the exact sciences-mainly theoretical modeling-to problems in disciplines that were traditionally defined by highly empirical practices, such as neurophysiology and neuroanatomy. Their efforts were met with mixed, often critical responses. This paper attempts to make sense of such dynamics by exploring the notion of a scientific style and its usefulness in accounting for the contrasts in scientific practice in brain research and in cybernetics during the 1940s. Focusing on two key institutional contexts of brain research and the role of the Rockefeller and Macy Foundations in directing brain research and cybernetics, the paper argues that the conflicts between these fields were not simply about experiment vs. theory but turned more closely on the questions that defined each area and the language used to elaborate answers.
authors.affiliation: Department of History, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1. taabraha@uoguelph.ca
authors.forename: Tara H
authors.initials: TH
authors.lastname: Abraham
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000266:history* / Q000379:methods; D001921:Brain; D003491:Cybernetics / Q000266:history* / Q000379:methods; D005582:Foundations / Q000266:history; D049673:History, 20th Century; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009488:Neurosciences / Q000266:history* / Q000379:methods; D012586:Science / Q000266:history* / Q000379:methods