title: Defending the doomed: implicit strategies concerning protection of first-person shooter games.
abstract: Censorship of violent digital games, especially first-person shooter (FPS) games, is broadly discussed between generations. While older people are concerned about possible negative influences of these games, not only players but also nonplayers of the younger net-generation seem to deny any association with real aggressive behavior. Our study aimed at investigating defense mechanisms players and nonplayers use to defend FPS and peers with playing habits. By using a lexical decision task, we found that aggressive concepts are activated by priming the content of FPS but suppressed afterward. Only if participants were instructed to actively suppress aggressive concepts after priming, thought suppression was no longer necessary. Young people still do have negative associations with violent video games. These associations are neglected by implicitly applying defense strategies--independent of own playing habits--to protect this specific hobby, which is common for the net-generation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Social and Media Psychology, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-St. 2, Cologne, Germany. jkneer@uni-koeln.de
authors.forename: Julia
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kneer
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Munko
authors.forename: Sabine
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Glock
authors.forename: Gary
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Bente
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000374:Aggression / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010988:Play and Playthings / Q000523:psychology*; D012919:Social Behavior; D018910:Video Games / Q000523:psychology*; D014754:Violence / Q000523:psychology