title: The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research.
abstract: Humans feel uncertain. They know when they do not know. These feelings and the responses to them ground the research literature on metacognition. It is a natural question whether animals share this cognitive capacity, and thus animal metacognition has become an influential research area within comparative psychology. Researchers have explored this question by testing many species using perception and memory paradigms. There is an emerging consensus that animals share functional parallels with humans' conscious metacognition. Of course, this research area poses difficult issues of scientific inference. How firmly should we hold the line in insisting that animals' performances are low-level and associative? How high should we set the bar for concluding that animals share metacognitive capacities with humans? This area offers a constructive case study for considering theoretical problems that often confront comparative psychologists. The authors present this case study and address diverse issues of scientific judgement and interpretation within comparative psychology.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, The University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-4110, USA. psysmith@buffalo.edu
authors.forename: J David
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Justin J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Couchman
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Beran
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D008251:Macaca / Q000523:psychology*; D008568:Memory; D010465:Perception; D011587:Psychology, Comparative / Q000379:methods