title: Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
abstract: In vivo estimations of the frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation (alpha) and backscatter (eta) coefficients using radiofrequency (rf) echoes acquired with clinical ultrasound systems must be independent of the data acquisition setup and the estimation procedures. In a recent in vivo assessment of these parameters in rodent mammary tumors, overall agreement was observed among alpha and eta estimates using data from four clinical imaging systems. In some cases, particularly in highly-attenuating heterogeneous tumors, multisystem variability was observed. This paper compares alpha and eta estimates of a well-characterized rodent-tumor-mimicking homogeneous phantom scanned using seven transducers with the same four clinical imaging systems: a Siemens Acuson S2000, an Ultrasonix RP, a Zonare Z.one and a VisualSonics Vevo2100. alpha and eta estimates of lesion-mimicking spheres in the phantom were independently assessed by three research groups, who analyzed their system's rf echo signals. Imaging-system-based estimates of alpha and eta of both lesion-mimicking spheres were comparable to through-transmission laboratory estimates and to predictions using Faran's theory, respectively. A few notable variations in results among the clinical systems were observed but the average and maximum percent difference between alpha estimates and laboratory-assessed values was 11% and 29%, respectively. Excluding a single outlier dataset, the average and maximum average difference between eta estimates for the clinical systems and values predicted from scattering theory was 16% and 33%, respectively. These results were an improvement over previous interlaboratory comparisons of attenuation and backscatter estimates. Although the standardization of our estimation methodologies can be further improved, this study validates our results from previous rodent breast-tumor model studies.
authors.affiliation: Department ofMedical Physics, University of Wisconsin, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
authors.forename: Kibo
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Nam
authors.forename: Ivan M
authors.initials: IM
authors.lastname: Rosado-Mendez
authors.forename: Lauren A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Wirtzfeld
authors.forename: Alexander D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Pawlicki
authors.forename: Viksit
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Kumar
authors.forename: Ernest L
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Madsen
authors.forename: Goutam
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ghoshal
authors.forename: Roberto J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Lavarello
authors.forename: Michael L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Oelze
authors.forename: Timothy A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Bigelow
authors.forename: James A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Zagzebski
authors.forename: William D
authors.initials: WD
authors.lastname: O'Brien
authors.forename: Timothy J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Hall
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D019220:High-Energy Shock Waves; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D051381:Rats; D012542:Scattering, Radiation; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation*; D014159:Transducers; D014465:Ultrasonics / Q000379:methods; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*