title: Student ethics in an era of personal entitlement.
abstract: 397 students arriving to take an exam in a junior level Principles of Management course were clearly warned on several occasions to keep cell phones outside the testing area or receive a failing test grade if the policy was violated. Just before the examination was administered, with all students sitting in their assigned seats, the professor made a final announcement that anyone still in possession of a cell phone would have one last opportunity to come forward and place it in a box at the front of the testing room. After eight students accepted this final "opportunity," the professor produced a hand-held metal detector, demonstrated how it could detect cell phones placed inside clothing, and informed the class that random screening of students would be conducted as they handed in their examinations. He then added that, as a special favor, he would allow a two-minute amnesty period during which any student could bring a cell phone to the front of the room for storage during the test. 38 students responded by turning in cell phones they had retained in direct violation of course policy. Implications of this cell phone dishonesty for creating viable business ethics and the role of perceived entitlement in shaping the behavior of these future business leaders were discussed.
authors.affiliation: University of South Florida, USA. mkarlins@aol.com
authors.forename: Marvin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Karlins
authors.forename: Edyth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hargis
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Balfour
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D040421:Cell Phone; D008192:Deception; D004989:Ethics; D040861:Ethics, Business; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology*; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods; D014481:United States; D014505:Urban Population; D055815:Young Adult