title: Pitfalls in the dipolar model for the neocortical EEG sources.
abstract: For about six decades, primary current sources of the electroencephalogram (EEG) have been assumed dipolar in nature. In this study, we used electrophysiological recordings from anesthetized Wistar rats undergoing repeated whisker deflections to revise the biophysical foundations of the EEG dipolar model. In a first experiment, we performed three-dimensional recordings of extracellular potentials from a large portion of the barrel field to estimate intracortical multipolar moments generated either by single spiking neurons (i.e., pyramidal cells, PC; spiny stellate cells, SS) or by populations of them while experiencing synchronized postsynaptic potentials. As expected, backpropagating spikes along PC dendrites caused dipolar field components larger in the direction perpendicular to the cortical surface (49.7 ± 22.0 nA·mm). In agreement with the fact that SS cells have "close-field" configurations, their dipolar moment at any direction was negligible. Surprisingly, monopolar field components were detectable both at the level of single units (i.e., -11.7 ± 3.4 nA for PC) and at the mesoscopic level of mixed neuronal populations receiving extended synaptic inputs within either a cortical column (-0.44 ± 0.20 μA) or a 2.5-m(3)-voxel volume (-3.32 ± 1.20 μA). To evaluate the relationship between the macroscopically defined EEG equivalent dipole and the mesoscopic intracortical multipolar moments, we performed concurrent recordings of high-resolution skull EEG and laminar local field potentials. From this second experiment, we estimated the time-varying EEG equivalent dipole for the entire barrel field using either a multiple dipole fitting or a distributed type of EEG inverse solution. We demonstrated that mesoscopic multipolar components are altogether absorbed by any equivalent dipole in both types of inverse solutions. We conclude that the primary current sources of the EEG in the neocortex of rodents are not precisely represented by a single equivalent dipole and that the existence of monopolar components must be also considered at the mesoscopic level.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. riera@idac.tohoku.ac.jp
authors.forename: Jorge J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Riera
authors.forename: Takeshi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Ogawa
authors.forename: Takakuni
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Goto
authors.forename: Akira
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sumiyoshi
authors.forename: Hiroi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Nonaka
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: Hiroyoshi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Miyakawa
authors.forename: Ryuta
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kawashima
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008839:Microelectrodes; D008959:Models, Neurological; D019579:Neocortex / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D014738:Vibrissae / Q000502:physiology