title: Discussion: 'A new method for assessing uterine activity' by Haran et al.
abstract: In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed: Haran G, Elbaz M, Fejgin MD, et al. A comparison of surface acquired uterine electromyography and intrauterine pressure catheter to assess uterine activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:412.e1-5.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
authors.forename: George A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Macones
authors.forename: Alison
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cahill
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Stamilio
authors.forename: Anthony
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Odibo
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D014590:Uterine Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D018590:Uterine Monitoring / Q000379:methods