title: [Prolapse surgery. With abdominal or vaginal meshes?].
abstract: In prolapse surgery several surgical techniques are available. The different open, laparoscopic and vaginal approaches are distinguished by distinct success and relapse rates and operation-specific complications. A safe and optimal therapeutic pelvic floor surgery should be based on the three support levels according to DeLancy and be individually adjusted for every patient. The vaginal approach may be used for all kinds of female genital prolapse and is a comparatively less invasive technique with a short time of convalescence. Apart from stress incontinence there is no need for synthetic meshes in primary approaches and excellent results with low complication and relapse rates can be achieved. An uncritical application of synthetic material is to be avoided in vaginal repair at all times. Abdominal surgical techniques, both open and laparoscopic, present their strengths in the therapeutic approach to level 1 defects or stress incontinence. They provide excellent functional and anatomical corrections and low relapse rates. Abdominally inserted meshes have lower complication rates than vaginal ones.
authors.affiliation: Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. hagen.loertzer@med.uni-goettingen.de
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Loertzer
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Schneider
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Thelen
authors.forename: R H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Ringert
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Strauß
mesh_terms: D000005:Abdomen / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019919:Prosthesis Implantation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*; D014621:Vagina / Q000601:surgery*