title: Understanding appropriate use criteria in nuclear medicine.
abstract: There has been a significant increase in cardiac radionuclide imaging over the past decade, leading to a corresponding increase in scrutiny from Federal and private health plans questioning the necessity of these tests. In response to efforts by third-party payers to limit all types of cardiovascular imaging studies, the American College of Cardiology Foundation, in conjunction with other professional societies, developed appropriate use criteria. The goal of this article is to explain how the criteria were created and define the 3 categories of indications: appropriate, inappropriate, and uncertain. Tips for using appropriate use criteria and tables, including a definition of several key terms technologists should be familiar with, will be provided. In addition, reimbursement, benchmark data, and practical considerations for implementation will be discussed. Finally, several tools to aid in calculating appropriateness are suggested. With a basic understanding, the appropriate use criteria are relatively easy to apply. It is important for facilities to begin to voluntarily incorporate them into their practice and document levels of appropriateness now as payers are developing 2 trends that are not favorable for nuclear cardiology: preauthorization and denial of payment for inappropriate studies.
authors.affiliation: Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD 21043, USA. farrell@intersocietal.org
authors.forename: Mary Beth
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Farrell
authors.forename: Manuel D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Cerqueira
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D019985:Benchmarking; D057791:Cardiac Imaging Techniques / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009683:Nuclear Medicine / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D012051:Reimbursement Mechanisms