title: Comparison of two ASI-based standardized patient placement approaches.
abstract: This study evaluated the predictive validity of two automated approaches based on the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) to patient placement criteria. Patients (N = 2,429) in 78 substance abuse treatment programs completed an ASI at intake and were assigned a treatment modality based on availability and clinical considerations. Treatment completion and self-reported abstinence 6 months post-discharge were collected. Two placement approaches were developed using ASI summary score cut points or problem-specific algorithms from ASI items. Both approaches showed evidence of predictive validity. Given the ASI's widespread use in community programs, evidence is provided in support of its ability to inform clinical judgment and implementation of standardized placement.
authors.affiliation: Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, USA. acamilleri@tresearch.org
authors.forename: Amy C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Camilleri
authors.forename: John S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Cacciola
authors.forename: Michelle R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Jenson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000553:Ambulatory Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D006760:Hospitalization / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012008:Recurrence; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D016320:Substance Abuse Treatment Centers / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D016896:Treatment Outcome