title: The effect of early initiation of rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study.
abstract: METHODS
  A multicenter randomized clinical trial including 82 patients.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine the effect of early initiation of rehabilitation after instrumented lumbar spinal fusion.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Lumbar spinal fusion has been performed for more than 70 years. Yet, few studies have examined patients' subsequent rehabilitation. Group-based rehabilitation is both efficient and cost-effective in rehabilitation of lumbar spinal fusion patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients with degenerative disc diseases undergoing instrumented lumbar spinal fusion were randomly assigned to initiate their rehabilitation 6 weeks (6-wk group) or 12 weeks after lumbar spinal fusion (12-wk group). Both groups received the same group-based rehabilitation. Primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcome was the Dallas Pain Questionnaire, the Low Back Pain Rating Scale, and absence from work. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the groups in terms of differences from baseline to 6 months and 1-year follow-up. Results are presented in median with 25th and 75th percentiles.
  
  
  RESULTS
  According to the Oswestry Disability Index, at 1-year follow-up, the 6-week-group had a median reduction of -6 (-19; 4) compared with -20 (-30;-7) in the 12-week group (P, 0.05). The Dallas Pain Questionnaire showed overall the same tendency, and within daily activities were significantly reduced in favor of the 12-week group (P, 0.05). For back pain, the 6-week group had a median reduction of -2.2 (-3.0; -0.7) similar with -3.3 (-4.7; -1.7) in the 12-week group (P, 0.05). The results at 6 months of follow-up were similar. No difference was found according to return to work 1 year postsurgery.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Early start of rehabilitation (6 wk vs. 12 wk) after lumbar spinal fusion resulted in inferior outcomes. The improvements in the 12-week group were 4 times better than that in the 6-week group, indicating that the start-up time of rehabilitation is an important contributing factor for the overall outcome.
authors.affiliation: Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade, Aarhus C, Denmark. lisaoest@rm.dk
authors.forename: Lisa G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Oestergaard
authors.forename: Claus V
authors.initials: CV
authors.lastname: Nielsen
authors.forename: Cody E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Bünger
authors.forename: Rikke
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sogaard
authors.forename: Soeren
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Fruensgaard
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Helmig
authors.forename: Finn B
authors.initials: FB
authors.lastname: Christensen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D055959:Intervertebral Disc Degeneration / Q000601:surgery*; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D010147:Pain Measurement; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors