title: Teaching medical ethics and law.
abstract: The teaching of medical ethics is not yet characterised by recognised, standard requirements for formal qualifications, training and experience; this is not surprising as the field is still relatively young and maturing. Under the broad issue of the requirements for teaching medical ethics are numerous more specific questions, one of which concerns whether medical ethics can be taught in isolation from considerations of the law, and vice versa. Ethics and law are cognate, though distinguishable, disciplines. In a practical, professional enterprise such as medicine, they cannot and should not be taught as separate subjects. One way of introducing students to the links and tensions between medical ethics and law is to consider the history of law via its natural and positive traditions. This encourages understanding of how medical practice is placed within the contexts of ethics and law in the pluralist societies in which most students will practise. Four examples of topics from medical ethics teaching are described to support this claim. Australasian medical ethics teachers have paid less attention to the role of law in their curricula than their United Kingdom counterparts. Questions like the one addressed here will help inform future deliberations concerning minimal requirements for teaching medical ethics.
authors.affiliation: University of Queensland. m.parker@uq.edu.au
authors.forename: Malcolm
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Parker
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D026688:Bioethical Issues / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D030881:Disclosure / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004992:Ethics, Medical / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D019221:Mandatory Reporting; D019300:Medical Errors / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D037022:Posthumous Conception / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D013663:Teaching