title: Ethical? Toward whom?
abstract: Comments on the original article, "Nonrational processes in ethical decision making" by M. D. Rogerson et al (see record 2011-19198-001). Among the many insightful points made by Rogerson, Gottlieb, Handelsman, Knapp, and Younggren (October 2011) regarding nonrational processes in ethical decision making, one deserves further explication: Many of psychologists' ethical decisions lead to actions done to someone. Unfortunately, frameworks and models of ethical decision making frequently neglect this fact by implying that the decisions happen in the abstract, but in truth, these decisions often affect a specific recipient. Importantly, the characteristics of that specific recipient, especially as perceived by the psychologist, can have a powerful impact on the process of ethical decision making (Caughron et al., 2011). It would be wise to add such a hypothetical to the list of specific questions that Rogerson et al recommended psychologists ask themselves: Would I make the same ethical decision if the person(s) toward whom the decision is directed had different characteristics?
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, IL 62026, USA. apomera@siue.edu
authors.forename: Andrew M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Pomerantz
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics*; D004644:Emotions / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D019545:Intuition / Q000941:ethics*