title: Disease management projects and the Chronic Care Model in action: baseline qualitative research.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Disease management programs, especially those based on the Chronic Care Model (CCM), are increasingly common in The Netherlands. While disease management programs have been well-researched quantitatively and economically, less qualitative research has been done. The overall aim of the study is to explore how disease management programs are implemented within primary care settings in The Netherlands; this paper focuses on the early development and implementation stages of five disease management programs in the primary care setting, based on interviews with project leadership teams.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted at the five selected sites with sixteen professionals interviewed; all project directors and managers were interviewed. The interviews focused on each project's chosen chronic illness (diabetes, eating disorders, COPD, multi-morbidity, CVRM) and project plan, barriers to development and implementation, the project leaders' action and reactions, as well as their roles and responsibilities, and disease management strategies. Analysis was inductive and interpretive, based on the content of the interviews. After analysis, the results of this research on disease management programs and the Chronic Care Model are viewed from a traveling technology framework.
  
  
  RESULTS
  This analysis uncovered four themes that can be mapped to disease management and the Chronic Care Model: (1) changing the health care system, (2) patient-centered care, (3) technological systems and barriers, and (4) integrating projects into the larger system. Project leaders discussed the paths, both direct and indirect, for transforming the health care system to one that addresses chronic illness. Patient-centered care was highlighted as needed and a paradigm shift for many. Challenges with technological systems were pervasive. Project leaders managed the expenses of a traveling technology, including the social, financial, and administration involved.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  At the sites, project leaders served as travel guides, assisting and overseeing the programs as they traveled from the global plans to local actions. Project leaders, while hypothetically in control of the programs, in fact shared control of the traveling of the programs with patients, clinicians, and outside consultants. From this work, we can learn what roadblocks and expenses occur while a technology travels, from a project leader's point of view.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. walters@bmg.eur.nl
authors.forename: Bethany Hipple
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Walters
authors.forename: Samantha A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Adams
authors.forename: Anna P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Nieboer
authors.forename: Roland
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bal
mesh_terms: D000288:Administrative Personnel / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000628:therapy*; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000379:methods*; D019468:Disease Management; D005260:Female; D006284:Health Plan Implementation; D006801:Humans; D007857:Leadership; D008297:Male; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009426:Netherlands; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D018802:Patient-Centered Care; D010865:Pilot Projects; D016730:Program Development; D036301:Qualitative Research; D017216:Telemedicine / Q000706:statistics & numerical data