title: Response suppression contributes to recency in serial recall.
abstract: Serial recall is often assumed to involve response suppression: the removal or inhibition of items already recalled so that they are not recalled again. Evidence for response suppression includes repetition inhibition and the separation of erroneous repetitions. Some theorists have suggested that response suppression, by eliminating competing responses, also contributes to recency in forward serial recall. We present experiments in which performance on the final item was examined as a function of whether or not the preceding retrievals entailed suppression of potential response competitors. In line with the predictions of response suppression, recency was found to be reduced when the earlier recall errors consisted of intrusion errors (which leave list items unsuppressed) rather than transposition errors (which involve suppression).
authors.affiliation: School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK. simon.farrell@bristol.ac.uk
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Farrell
authors.forename: Stephan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lewandowsky
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011578:Psycholinguistics / Q000379:methods; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult