title: Populism vs. elitism: social consensus and social status as bases of attitude certainty.
abstract: This study examined the effects of social consensus and social status on attitude certainty that is conceptualized multi-dimensionally as perceived clarity and correctness of one's attitude. In a mock opinion exchange about a social issue, participants were either supported (high consensus) or opposed (low consensus) by most of the confederates. They were informed that their opinion (high status) or their opponents' opinion (low status) had the alleged psychological significance indicative of future success. Post-experimental attitude clarity was significantly greater when attitudinal position was associated with high rather than low status. Attitude correctness was interactively affected by social status and social consensus. Supporting the compensatory effect hypothesis, attitude correctness was comparable across the levels of social consensus as long as they were associated with high status, and across the levels of social status as long as they were associated with high social consensus.
authors.affiliation: San Diego State University, Department of Psychology, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182-4611, USA. rprislin@sunstroke.sdsu.edu
authors.forename: Radmila
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Prislin
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Shaffer
authors.forename: Marisa
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Crowder
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D032921:Consensus; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011581:Psychological Tests; D012919:Social Behavior; D012923:Social Class; D055815:Young Adult