title: Looking at CER from Medicare's perspective.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is rapidly adding to the amount of data available to health care coverage and payment decision makers. Medicare's decisions have a large effect on coverage and reimbursement policies throughout the health insurance industry and will likely influence the entire U.S. health care system; thus, examining its role in integrating CER into policy is crucial.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To describe the potential benefits of CER to support payment and coverage decisions in the Medicare program, limitations on its use,the role of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in improving the infrastructure for CER, and to discuss challenges that must be addressed to integrate CER into CMS's decision-making process.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A defining feature of CER is that it provides the type of evidence that will help decision makers, such as patients, clinicians, and payers,make more informed treatment and policy decisions. Because CMS is responsible for more than 47 million elderly and disabled beneficiaries, the way that Medicare uses CER has the potential to have a large impact on public and individual health. Currently many critical payment and coverage decisions within the Medicare program are made on the basis of poor quality evidence, and CER has the potential to greatly improve the quality of decision making. Despite common misconceptions, CMS is not prohibited by law from using CER apart from some reasonable limitations. CMS is,however, required to support the development of the CER infrastructure by making their data more readily available to researchers. While CER has substantial potential to improve the quality of the agency's policy decisions,challenges remain to integrate CER into Medicare's processes. These challenges include statutory ambiguities, lack of sufficient staff and internal resources to take advantage of CER, and the lack of an active voice in setting priorities for CER and study design.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although challenges exist, CER has the potential to greatly enhance CMS's ability to make decisions regarding coverage and payment that will benefit both the agency and their patient population.
authors.affiliation: Center for Medical Technology Policy, 401 E Pratt St, Ste. 631,Baltimore, MD 21202, USA. Penny.Mohr@cmtpnet.org
authors.forename: Penny
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mohr
mesh_terms: D057186:Comparative Effectiveness Research / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D006801:Humans; D019458:Insurance Coverage / Q000191:economics; D006278:Medicare; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012051:Reimbursement Mechanisms / Q000191:economics; D014481:United States