title: Comparison of abdominal computed tomography and abdominal ultrasound in sedated dogs.
abstract: Abdominal ultrasound (US) is used frequently as a first-line screening tool for abdominal disease. Although computed tomography (CT) is superior to US in the diagnosis of some abdominal diseases, a major impediment is the requirement of general anesthesia to prevent motion and for safe restraint. With multidetector helical CT, faster examinations allow general anesthesia to be avoided, while producing diagnostic-quality images. Abdominal US and CT were compared for lesion detection in 27 sedated dogs, divided into three even groups based on body weight. Lesions were categorized further as to subjective clinical relevance. In dogs less than 25 kg, there is no significant difference in lesion detection between CT and US. In dogs weighing greater than 25 kg, more lesions were detected with CT than with US (P = 0.0001), including clinically relevant lesions (P = 0.0277). From these results, it appears that CT has an advantage in lesion detection in dogs greater than 25 kg, making it a better screening test for abdominal disease in these patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
authors.forename: Erica L
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Fields
authors.forename: Ian D
authors.initials: ID
authors.lastname: Robertson
authors.forename: Jason A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Osborne
authors.forename: James C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Brown
mesh_terms: D000005:Abdomen / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D000818:Animals; D016292:Procedural Sedation / Q000662:veterinary; D003287:Contrast Media; D004283:Dog Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D004285:Dogs; D007472:Iohexol; D061330:Multidetector Computed Tomography / Q000662:veterinary*; D011860:Radiography, Abdominal / Q000662:veterinary*; D014463:Ultrasonography
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D007472:Iohexol