title: Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the positive predictive values (PPVs) of Breast Imaging and Reporting Data Systems (BI-RADS) assessment categories for breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to identify the BI-RADS MR imaging lesion features most predictive of cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  This institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant prospective multicenter study was performed with written informed consent. Breast MR imaging studies of the contralateral breast in women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer were prospectively evaluated. Contralateral breast MR imaging BI-RADS assessment categories, morphologic descriptors for foci, masses, non-masslike enhancement (NMLE), and kinetic features were assessed for predictive values for malignancy. PPV of each imaging characteristic of interest was estimated, and logistic regression analysis was used to examine the predictive ability of combinations of characteristics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 969 participants, 71.3% had a BI-RADS category 1 or 2 assessment; 10.9%, a BI-RADS category 3 assessment; 10.0%, a BI-RADS category 4 or 5 assessment; and 7.7%, a BI-RADS category 0 assessment on the basis of initial MR images. Thirty-one cancers were detected with MR imaging. Overall PPV for BI-RADS category 4 and 5 lesions was 0.278, with 17 cancers in patients with a BI-RADS category 4 lesion (PPV, 0.205) and 10 cancers in patients with a BI-RADS category 5 lesion (PPV, 0.714). Of the cancers, one was a focus, 17 were masses, and 13 were NMLEs. For masses, irregular shape, irregular margins, spiculated margins, and marked internal enhancement were most predictive of malignancy. For NMLEs, ductal, clumped, and reticular or dendritic enhancement were the features most frequently seen with malignancy. Kinetic enhancement features were less predictive of malignancy than were morphologic features.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Standardized terminology of the BI-RADS lexicon enables quantification of the likelihood of malignancy for MR imaging-detected lesions through careful evaluation of lesion features. In particular, BI-RADS assessment categories and morphologic descriptors for masses and NMLE were useful in estimating the probability of cancer.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, ML 772, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA. mary.mahoney@uchealth.com
authors.forename: Mary C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Mahoney
authors.forename: Constantine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gatsonis
authors.forename: Lucy
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Hanna
authors.forename: Wendy B
authors.initials: WB
authors.lastname: DeMartini
authors.forename: Constance
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Lehman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001706:Biopsy; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008327:Mammography; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests