title: The hospitalized prisoner with a life-threatening illness: criminal first and patient second?
abstract: It is generally accepted that the Patient's Bill of Rights applies to all patients including prisoners. Yet, a prisoners' incarcerated status generally prohibits inmates from making any decision that may shorten his/her life, and as such, the de facto medical decision maker becomes the medical director of the state correctional facility. This case study highlights the challenges that arise when the ethically appropriate response to a hospitalized prisoner's terminal medical condition warrants decisions that are in conflict with that advocated by the correctional facility.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA. Jbadger@lifespan.org
authors.forename: James M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Badger
authors.forename: Rosalind Ekman
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Ladd
authors.forename: Glenn R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Friedemann
mesh_terms: D017809:Fatal Outcome; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D007822:Laryngeal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy*; D008297:Male; D016743:Mental Competency; D008875:Middle Aged; D028701:Patient Rights / Q000941:ethics*; D011329:Prisoners / Q000523:psychology*; D014139:Tracheostomy