title: Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a minimally conscious state: re: M and its repercussions.
abstract: In 2011 the English Court of Protection ruled that it would be unlawful to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a woman, M, who had been in a minimally conscious state for 8 years. It was reported as the first English legal case concerning withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration from a patient in a minimally conscious state who was otherwise stable. In the absence of a valid and applicable advance decision refusing treatment, of other life-limiting pathology or excessively burdensome suffering, the judgement makes it clear that the obligation on health professionals falls strongly in favour of preserving life. Although the Court sought to limit the judgement as closely as possible to the facts of the case, it is likely to have a significant impact on life-sustaining treatment decisions for people in states of low awareness. This paper outlines the main legal features of the judgement.
authors.affiliation: Ethics Department, British MedicalAssociation, London WC1H 9JP, UK. jsheather@bma.org.uk
authors.forename: Julian C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Sheather
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D016223:Advance Directives; D005190:Family / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D018529:Nutritional Support / Q000941:ethics*; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State / Q000628:therapy; D028723:Personhood; D028761:Withholding Treatment / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*