[Partial nephrectomy. Rationale and limitations of an organ-preserving approach].
The rising incidence of renal cell cancer in recent decades has led to a revision in the therapy of this malignancy. For small renal masses, partial nephrectomy has become the standard surgical treatment instead of radical nephrectomy. This approach can lead to a higher overall survival due to preservation of renal function. Avoiding chronic kidney disease is mandatory for patients with benign or small non-aggressive tumors; however, partial nephrectomy correlates with higher complication rates and is conditioned by operator skills. The role of partial nephrectomy compared to radical nephrectomy is still to be established particularly for larger tumors. The results of studies so far are mostly based on non-randomized retrospective data. This article will present the pros and cons of partial nephrectomy and will focus on the steps required to promulgate the indications of nephron-sparing surgery.
Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
J
J
Casuscelli
C
C
Gratzke
C G
CG
Stief
M
M
Staehler
D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D007680:Kidney Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D009392:Nephrectomy / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends*; D059351:Organ Sparing Treatments / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends*