"They should take time": disclosure of clinical trial results as part of a social relationship.
Disclosing overall scientific results to clinical trial participants has become an ethical obligation. Here we studied how participants understand these results in view of their experience of clinical trials and illness in general and what modes of disclosure they preferred. Interviews were conducted with 29 breast cancer patients in France during 2009, using an in-depth qualitative approach. The findings obtained show that the "results" of research are understood quite differently by various patients depending on their expectations about clinical trials. Most of the women interviewed expected to receive personally tailored results at an individual encounter with their own clinical oncologist. Their preferred mode of disclosure was a consultation with their doctors because personal encounters promote mutual recognition and set up a symbolic process of exchange. The results of this study show that medical interventions should not be regarded solely from the technical point of view, but also in terms of the social relationships involved.
GReCSS, Centre Norbert Elias, UMR8562, Aix-en-Provence, France. aline.sarradon@wanadoo.fr
Aline
A
Sarradon-Eck
Juliette
J
Sakoyan
Alice
A
Desclaux
Julien
J
Mancini
Dominique
D
Genre
Claire
C
Julian-Reynier
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D030881:Disclosure; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D036301:Qualitative Research