Applying econometrics to the carbon dioxide "control knob".
This paper tests various propositions underlying claims that observed global temperature change is mostly attributable to anthropogenic noncondensing greenhouse gases, and that although water vapour is recognized to be a dominant contributor to the overall greenhouse gas (GHG) effect, that effect is merely a "feedback" from rising temperatures initially resulting only from "non-condensing" GHGs and not at all from variations in preexisting naturally caused atmospheric water vapour (i.e., [H(2)O]). However, this paper shows that "initial radiative forcing" is not exclusively attributable to forcings from noncondensing GHG, both because atmospheric water vapour existed before there were any significant increases in GHG concentrations or temperatures and also because there is no evidence that such increases have produced measurably higher [H(2)O]. The paper distinguishes between forcing and feedback impacts of water vapour and contends that it is the primary forcing agent, at much more than 50% of the total GHG gas effect. That means that controlling atmospheric carbon dioxide is unlikely to be an effective "control knob" as claimed by Lacis et al. (2010).
Emeritus Faculty, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. tcurtin@bigblue.net.au
Timothy
T
Curtin
D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry*; D002980:Climate; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004787:Environmental Pollution / Q000032:analysis* / Q000517:prevention & control*; D005246:Feedback; D057232:Global Warming; D017059:Models, Econometric; D018505:Waste Management / Q000379:methods*
D002245:Carbon Dioxide