Avulsion of the auricle in an anticoagulated patient: is leeching contraindicated? A review and a case.
Amputation of the auricle is a periodic occurrence leading to disfigurement if not treated properly. Venous stasis is a common complication in reattachments and requires decongestant and anticoagulant treatment. Today, leech therapy is the treatment of choice. Common problems are that it is not available everywhere and that it is usually contraindicated in anticoagulated patients. The peculiarities of leech therapy and the various aspects of surgical management are reviewed. A case of a partial amputation of the auricle in a patient under concomitant anticoagulation therapy with warfarin is presented. The amputated part was reattached in another hospital without microvascular anastomosis. The patient presented to our department with early signs of venous congestion. Leech therapy was started 35 hours after trauma, and the patient continued his anticoagulation therapy. With this treatment, 90% of the amputated part was rescued. The anticoagulation therapy of the patient may have played an important role in the first hours after reattachment, preventing capillary thrombosis and in consequence facilitating the minimal oxygenation necessary. The claim that anticoagulation therapy is a contraindication to leeching should be questioned in cases of reattachments in well-controllable locations without arterial anastomosis.
Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Cirugía Maxilofacial, Tarragona, Spain.
Jens
J
Mommsen
Javier
J
Rodríguez-Fernández
Mario
M
Mateos-Micas
Olga
O
Vázquez-Bouso
Victor
V
Gumbao-Grau
Gabriel
G
Forteza-Gonzalez