Pay-for-performance programs to reduce racial/ethnic disparities: what might different designs achieve?
Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs may have unintended effects on racial/ethnic disparities. We used patient-level quality scores from the Hospital Quality Alliance and ranked hospitals by overall quality and by racial/ethnic disparities. We then modeled the effects of different P4P designs on national disparity scores. The models using overall quality to rank hospitals resulted in modest reductions in national disparity scores, although these were smaller than the reductions that were found from programs using disparities to rank hospitals. These results suggest that many hospitals treat Whites and minorities equitably. Nevertheless, in order to maximize both improvements in quality and reductions in national disparities, P4P programs should consider an approach that considers both overall quality and reductions in disparities when setting incentives.
Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA. jweissman@partners.org
Joel S
JS
Weissman
Romana
R
Hasnain-Wynia
Robin M
RM
Weinick
Raymond
R
Kang
Christine
C
Vogeli
Lisa
L
Iezzoni
Mary Beth
MB
Landrum
D054625:Healthcare Disparities / Q000208:ethnology*; D006739:Hospital Administration; D006761:Hospitals / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D008913:Minority Groups; D017146:Models, Organizational; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014481:United States