An explanation for camera perspective bias in voluntariness judgment for video-recorded confession: Suggestion of cognitive frame.
Three experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that difference in voluntariness judgment for a custodial confession filmed in different camera focuses ("camera perspective bias") could occur because a particular camera focus conveys a suggestion of a particular cognitive frame. In Experiment 1, 146 juror eligible adults in Korea showed a camera perspective bias in voluntariness judgment with a simulated confession filmed with two cameras of different focuses, one on the suspect and the other on the detective. In Experiment 2, the same bias in voluntariness judgment emerged without cameras when the participants were cognitively framed, prior to listening to the audio track of the videos used in Experiment 1, by instructions to make either a voluntariness judgment for a confession or a coerciveness judgment for an interrogation. In Experiment 3, the camera perspective bias in voluntariness judgment disappeared when the participants viewing the video focused on the suspect were initially framed to make coerciveness judgment for the interrogation and the participants viewing the video focused on the detective were initially framed to make voluntariness judgment for the confession. The results in combination indicated that a particular camera focus may convey a suggestion of a particular cognitive frame in which a video-recorded confession/interrogation is initially represented. Some forensic and policy implications were discussed.
Department of Psychology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju City, Chungbuk, Republic of Korea. kwangbai@chungbuk.ac.kr
Kwangbai
K
Park
Jimin
J
Pyo
D000328:Adult; D003068:Coercion; D003416:Criminal Law; D005260:Female; D044707:Forensic Sciences; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D016495:Police; D056910:Republic of Korea; D012938:Social Perception; D014342:Truth Disclosure; D014741:Video Recording; D014836:Volition