Effect of group means on the probability of consensus.
In this study, groups who could not reach a consensus were investigated using the group polarization paradigm. The purpose was to explore the conditions leading to intragroup disagreement and attitude change following disagreement among 269 participants. Analysis indicated that the probability of consensus was low when the group means differed from the grand mean of the entire sample. When small differences among group members were found, depolarization (reverse direction of polarization) followed disagreement. These results suggested the groups which deviated most from the population tendency were the most likely to cause within-group disagreement, while within-group variances determined the direction of attitude change following disagreement within the group.
Faculty of Human and Cultural Studies, Kyoto Gakuen University, 1-1 Nanjo-ootani, Sogabecho, Kameoka, Kyoto 621-8555, Japan. arima@kyotogakuen.ac.jp
Yoshiko
Y
Arima
D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D002321:Career Choice; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D032921:Consensus; D003469:Culture; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D007857:Leadership; D008393:Marriage; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D011057:Politics; D011336:Probability; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D014931:Women, Working / Q000523:psychology; D055815:Young Adult